The beginning of the end of the EAEU or the end of illusions: Armenia’s choice

Eurasia Daily
July 30, 2026
July 30th, 2026
21:44

Nikol Pashinyan’s telephone conversation with Vladimir Putin on July 27 did not solve the main problem, for which the Armenian prime minister actually turned to the Russian president. Restrictions on the supply of Armenian products to Russia’s sanctions remain in force, specific dates for their cancellation have not been named, and manufacturers continue to incur losses. Two days after the conversation, Pashinyan tried to present it as a political dialogue that had taken place, but his own statements confirmed that there was no practical result on the export issue yet.

On July 29, after a meeting of the Civil Contract board, Pashinyan said that the conversation with Putin “turned out” because the leaders talked for a long time and allegedly came to a common understanding on a number of issues. According to him, Russia recognizes Armenia’s “legitimate right” to form foreign policy and economic alternatives. Pashinyan also said that he told Putin: Armenia has announced a move to the side The EU will continue to follow this path, especially since voters supported the relevant program of the ruling party.

However, the duration of the conversation by itself does not mean that agreements have been reached. The official communications of the parties do not contain a decision to lift restrictions, nor an agreed mechanism for the return of Armenian goods to the Russian market, nor a specific time frame for resolving the crisis.

According to the Armenian government, Pashinyan told Putin that restrictions on the export of goods of Armenian origin contradict the Armenian-Russian legal framework and regulations of the EAEU, and then asked to take measures to solve the problem. The Kremlin, for its part, said that the conversation took place precisely on the initiative of the Armenian side. In other words, it was Pashinyan who called Putin with a request to intervene in the situation, and not the Russian president who called the Armenian prime minister with a proposal to lift restrictions.

Instead of promising to restore the previous trade regime, Putin again emphasized the need to hold a referendum on joining the EU or staying in the EAEU in Armenia as soon as possible. It is this difference in official accents that best shows the real outcome of the conversation: Yerevan was talking about goods and losses, Moscow was talking about Armenia’s geopolitical choice.

The story of Putin’s lack of congratulations on the results of the parliamentary elections is also indicative. To a direct question from journalists, Pashinyan replied: “If he didn’t want to, he didn’t congratulate,” and then added: “He didn’t congratulate, but then who was he talking to?” Thus, the prime minister tried to present the very fact of the telephone conversation as an indirect recognition of his status and election results. But such an argument looks strained. Moreover, according to the Kremlin’s official statement, the initiator of the call was not Putin, but the Armenian side. Moreover, Pashinyan said that the parties agreed to meet in the future, but there is also no specific date for the meeting yet.

More details: https://www.eadaily.com/en/news/2026/07/30/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-eaeu-or-the-end-of-illusions-armenias-choice-after-putins-conversation-with-pashinyan

Armenpress: Kazakhstan views hosting of Games of the Future 2026 as historic m

Sports12:07, 31 July 2026
Read the article in: Armenian:

Kazakhstan has described its hosting of the 2026 Games of the Future as a historic milestone, emphasizing the event’s role in preparing for future challenges in sports and technology.

Astana is currently hosting the third edition of the Games of the Future, bringing together traditional sports and modern digital technologies.

Speaking at a press briefing, Meiram Sapargali, an official representative of Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Tourism and Sports, emphasized the significance of holding this international tournament in Kazakhstan, noting that the country is using the event to elevate both traditional and phygital sports to a new level.

“In previous editions of the Games of the Future, national teams participated. This year, however, the format has changed. Clubs from different countries now take part, and their squads may include athletes from various nations. Another important change concerns the competition system. Each host country selects the disciplines itself. This year, eight disciplines have been chosen: football, basketball, several Counter-Strike formats, and, for the first time, sport dancing has been included in the program,” he said.

According to Sapargali, Kazakhstan’s main goal is to develop phygital sports in the country, and Kazakh athletes are already achieving strong results on the international stage. Next year, Kazakhstan is also expected to host the World Esports Championship.

“Previously, the Games of the Future were hosted by Russia and Abu Dhabi. Experience shows that the tournament format is gradually shifting toward club-based competitions. First, this makes the event more interesting, and second, esports athletes are already accustomed to competing as part of clubs rather than national teams. Since phygital sports are not equally developed in all countries, the club format is probably the most practical solution.

Kazakhstan is consistently working to develop technologies, including digital technologies. This is a historic moment, as Kazakhstan is hosting the Games of the Future for the first time. If previously they were held in countries with highly developed infrastructure, Kazakhstan has now become the first country in Central Asia to host this prestigious competition,” he emphasized.

More than 800 athletes and esports representatives from over 30 countries will compete in Astana.

Read the article in: Armenian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Trump says Board of Peace reaches Gaza disarmament deal

U. S.12:16, 31 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

U.S. President Donald Trump said that the “Board of Peace” reached an agreement for the complete disarmament ‌of Palestinian Hamas militants and other armed groups in Gaza, Reuters reports.

Trump cast it as a “major milestone in the implementation of the Trump 20-Point Plan” to end Israel’s war in ⁠Gaza.

Trump said on social media that the deal would be carried out in phases, with Israeli forces withdrawing as disarmament proceeds and an International Stabilization Force working with a new Palestinian police force to secure the area.

He thanked mediators Egypt, Qatar and Türkiye.

“This agreement is a critical step towards Gaza finally being governed by a new Palestinian ‌government ⁠that will work closely with the Board of Peace to help the Palestinian people,” Trump said.

“At the same time, Israel will have the security it deserves,” Trump added.

Earlier in ⁠the day, Reuters cited sources as saying that talks between mediators and Hamas leaders in Cairo on implementing a U.S.-brokered Gaza peace plan made ⁠rare progress although an Israeli official said proposed terms were not satisfactory.

Israeli strikes killed at least ⁠six Palestinians in Gaza on Thursday, including two children, medics said.

A senior Hamas official has told the BBC the group has agreed to the Board of Peace’s plan to completely disarm in Gaza and that an official statement would be released soon. Israel has yet to comment.

The board, created and led by Trump, said in a statement that the agreement concludes months of “intensive, good faith negotiations”, and that its focus is now on implementation.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Verelq: Diversification as the new addiction

Even foreigners, including Muslims, know that it is impossible to diversify energy sources through Azerbaijan. Through Azerbaijan, not diversification, but dependence is possible.


Unlike many countries, Azerbaijan has been able to successfully convert its energy resources into political influence.


This is a fact, and it is impossible not to take this fact into account, moreover, it is a betrayal of the national interest.


And I constantly think, what name to give to those who, realizing that Azerbaijan will not contribute to Armenia’s energy independence and diversification, but will create dependence, but still preach dependence on Azerbaijan…


Political scientist Ara Poghosyan




Alik Aleksanyan’s detention was extended for another 2 months

The detention of “Strong Armenia” co-founder Alik Aleksanyan was extended for another 2 months. Lawyer Eduard Hovhannisyan informed journalists about this in the courtyard of the court.


“This decision is not acceptable to us, we will appeal to the Court of Appeal,” he said.


Let’s remind that Alik Aleksanyan is accused of money laundering and taking financial advantage of people to participate in the gatherings.

A statement about suicides requires evidence

31.07.2026

Yesterday, Nikol Pashinyan announced three reasons for suicides in the army, including getting into debt by betting.


I wonder if there is any clear, exact, proven statistic that x percent of suicide cases were the result of betting. Are there concrete proven cases, or is it just a peculiar “hint” to investigative bodies to attribute possible cases to gambling? Probably the next statement will be that “suicide is in the heads of these people”.


Analyst Hakob Badalyan



The forces are searching the house of Narek Karapetyan

Early this morning, the security forces entered the house of Narek Karapetyan, who received the mandate of the “Strong Armenia” bloc deputy, and are conducting searches.


Marianna Ghahramanyan, spokesperson of the “Strong Armenia” party, who received a mandate as a member of parliament, reports this.


“Illegal persecution of “Strong Armenia” continues,” he wrote.


“Investigative operations are being carried out at Narek Karapetyan’s house within the framework of the criminal proceedings related to Alik Aleksanyan,” the Investigative Committee informed Sputnik Armenia.

The delegation of border guard troops of the RA NSS visited Georgia

On July 27-30, at the invitation of the head of the border guard police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia, Davit Tamazashvili, the delegation led by the commander of the border guard troops of the Republic of Armenia, colonel Garik Muradyan, was on an official visit to Georgia.


This is reported by the National Security Service.

Within the framework of the visit, a meeting was held with Davit Tamazashvili, head of the border guard police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia, during which the Georgian side presented the structure, main functions and priority directions of the border guard police. During the meeting, issues related to ensuring border security and cooperation between border agencies were discussed, as well as the willingness to continuously develop cooperation was reaffirmed.

The delegation also had a meeting with Levan Maisuradze, director of the Patrol Police Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia. During the meeting, the main directions of patrol police activities were presented, as well as the problems related to queues at the border crossing points of the Republic of Armenia and Georgia were discussed.

The delegation also visited the Public Security and Police Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia, the structure of the academy, the features of the organization of the educational process, modern educational infrastructures and training opportunities were presented, where border guards are also trained.

During the visit, the delegation of border guard troops of the RA NSS also visited the 112 Public Security Management Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia.

At the end of the visit, the commander of the border guard troops of the RA NSS, colonel Garik Muradyan, thanked Davit Tamazashvili, the head of the border guard police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia, for the invitation, warm reception, productive meetings and constructive discussions aimed at the further development of bilateral cooperation.

Pashinyan presented only the positive factors of Moody’s decision, but not everything

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, referring to Moody’s Ratings international rating agency’s assessment of Armenia’s sovereign rating at the government meeting on July 30, stated: “Moody’s revised Armenia’s rating outlook from “stable” to “positive” and reconfirmed the long-term sovereign rating at Ba3 level.”


Referring to the improvement of the rating perspective and the maintenance of the sovereign rating at the Ba3 level, the Prime Minister presented the positive changes recorded in the agency’s assessment, pointing out the reduction of political and geopolitical risks, the improvement of economic growth prospects and the strengthening of the structural potential of the economy.


The “Fact Checking Platform” compared the statements made at the government meeting with the full decision of Moody’s Ratings and noted that the prime minister’s official presentation did not include a number of key risks and reservations pointed out by the agency. FIP writes about this.


Risks not presented at the Cabinet meeting


The uncertainty of concluding a peace treaty


Among the reasons for the improvement of the outlook, Moody’s indeed mentions the weakening of geopolitical and political risks caused by the decrease in the probability of a large-scale military conflict with Azerbaijan. At the same time, however, the agency warns that the conclusion of a full peace agreement is still unlikely.


“Conclusion of a full peace treaty is unlikely in the foreseeable future, as Azerbaijan continues to demand that Armenia change its Constitution, which remains a politically sensitive and domestically difficult issue for Yerevan,” the decision states.


Economic risks arising from relations with Russia


The agency also referred to the changing foreign policy orientation of Armenia and the ongoing uncertainty surrounding relations with Russia. According to Moody’s assessment, in the conditions of close economic relations between the two countries, this uncertainty may affect the economic security of Armenia.


“Although geopolitical risks have decreased, uncertainties surrounding Armenia’s changing foreign orientation and relations with Russia continue to create risks for Armenia’s economic security, given the two countries’ close economic ties,” the decision states.

Economic risks and double-digit unemployment


Looking at the structure, the positive impact of high economic growth indicators on the large-scale improvement of economic fundamentals is not yet evident. The impact on labor market indicators is apparently weak. The unemployment rate has declined but remains in double digits, partly reflecting a narrow base of growth, concentrated in a few sectors, as well as structural constraints such as skills mismatches and high shadowing.


Domestic savings have also remained low, hampered by underdeveloped domestic capital markets and shadowing, which limits the mobilization of household savings.


As a result, Armenia continues to run a significant current account deficit, largely financed by foreign capital inflows, and foreign direct investment (FDI) contributions remain modest at around 2% of GDP. The low level of domestic savings in turn leads to a relatively high cost of domestic borrowing.



Demographic challenges and emigration of highly qualified professionals


In its assessment, Moody’s also highlights Armenia’s socio-demographic risks, which may limit the country’s long-term economic growth potential.


Among the main challenges, the agency mentions the small number and aging of the population, the high level of unemployment among young people and the emigration of highly educated Armenians.


According to Moody’s assessment, emigration contributes to the inflow of remittances, mitigating its negative consequences to some extent, but on the other hand, it exacerbates demographic problems.


According to the agency, a shift to higher productivity service sectors, including information technology, can help mitigate these risks.


The structure also referred to the points that can contribute to the further increase of Armenia’s rating.


Moody’s noted that consistent reforms in the directions of promoting exports, improving the business environment and expanding employment can contribute to the improvement of Armenia’s rating. The strengthening of regional stability, the progress of normalization of relations with Azerbaijan and Turkey, the implementation of projects expanding Armenia’s connectivity and trade opportunities with the support of the EU and the US, and greater clarity regarding relations with Russia can also have a positive impact.


The agency also emphasized the improvement of labor market indicators and the development of domestic capital markets, which can reduce the cost of borrowing and strengthen the ability to service public debt.


Thus, at the government meeting, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan presented to the public only the positive factors behind Moody’s decision. Meanwhile, the agency’s report also points out a number of risks: the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the peace treaty, economic risks arising from relations with Russia, double-digit unemployment, low levels of foreign direct investment and demographic challenges.