Our Century: Spiraling Paths Through Armenian Cinema

City Guide

Oct 19, 2026
Our Century: Spiraling Paths Through Armenian Cinema
Traveling, leaving one’s home and country, has long been part of the Armenian cultural imagination, appearing in folklore, songs, and the work of medieval Armenian poets. Centuries of displacement, the absence of statehood, the Genocide and the formation of one of the largest diasporas in the world, as well as difficult economic conditions, have made movement an enduring part of Armenian life. But leaving is not always only about departure. Journeys can also become ways of searching for oneself, rediscovering a lost connection, negotiating one’s sense of belonging, and sometimes finding a way back home.

The five films in this program, made by Armenian filmmakers from different parts of the world and across different periods, follow characters who are constantly on the move. Their journeys unfold across borders and landscapes, but also through memory, history, identity, and imagination. From a pilgrimage to the pursuit of the American dream, from tracing the image of a homeland through a childhood calendar to crossing the country to escape the truth, the program offers a glimpse into an Armenian cinema in an uncompromising search for answers to its own existential questions. These are journeys that rarely follow a straight line, circling back to questions of home, identity, memory, and belonging.

Film 1: Hello, It’s Me Fri 23 Oct 2026, 6:30 – 8:45 p.m. The first Armenian film to screen at the Cannes Film Festival in 1966, ‘Hello, It’s Me’ is a fictionalized biography of physicist Artem Alikhanyan.

Films 2-3: Calendar + Lebbeus in the Name of Thaddeus Sat 24 Oct 2026, 12:30 – 2:15 p.m. ‘Calendar’ follows a photographer who visits Armenia shortly after the country gains independence from the Soviet Union to photograph twelve Armenian churches for a calendar. Preceded by Arby Ovanessian’s ‘Lebbeus in the Name of Thaddeus’.

Film 4: Last Station Sat 24 Oct 2026, 3:15 – 5 p.m. ‘Last Station’ tells the story of Egyptian-Armenian actors Nora Armani and Gérald Papasian, who travel to Los Angeles in search of the American dream.

Film 5: After Dreaming Sun 25 Oct 2026, 2:15 – 4:30 p.m. The directorial debut of Christine Haroutounian, After Dreaming is set in post-war Armenia and follows a soldier, Atom, who is asked to take Clodette on a road trip so she will be away during her father’s funeral.

Guest curated by Sona Karapoghosyan.

Thank you to the Armenian General Benevolent Union for their support and sponsorship of Our Century: Spiraling Through Armenian Cinema.

Venue: Asia Society

725 Park Avenue Map
212-288-6400

—

UN official declines to comment on Azerbaijan’s destruction of Armenian cultur

News.am, Armenia
Oct 18, 2026

Astrid Schomaker, Executive Secretary of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), has declined to comment on Azerbaijan’s vandalism and destruction of Armenian churches in Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh).

The Armenian News-NEWS.am’s reporter asked Schomaker how she assessed Azerbaijan’s actions toward the Armenian cultural heritage of Artsakh, noting that some churches were destroyed.

“I am the Executive Secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity. I’m not commenting on this issue. Thank you,” the UN official replied.

—

How do you start over in a foreign country with $500, no job, and a cat to fee

Meduza
Oct 19, 2026

How do you start over in a foreign country with $500, no job, and a cat to feed?

Elmira Drau, a Russian émigré who teaches English, tells the story of her flight to Armenia and the life she built.

October 19, 2026, 8:04 amSource: Meduza

Meduza recently launched “The Emigrant Questionnaire,” a series about Russians living abroad. We plan to tell the stories of emigrants both famous and little known. Russian singer Monetochka filled out the first questionnaire. The second respondent is Elmira Drau, a 32-year-old English teacher who volunteered to take part — and we were delighted to take her up on it. Drau left Gelendzhik for Yerevan in May 2022 after someone reported her to the authorities over an antiwar comment in a Telegram chat. The only money she and her husband had came from selling their car. Neither had a remote job, and they didn’t know anyone in the city. At times, things were so hard that they had only enough money to feed their cat. Still, Elmira launched a new project (more than one, in fact!) that earns her an income. She also helps stray animals and is writing a book about emigration.

What’s your name?

Elmira

Where do you live, and how long have you lived there?

I live in Yerevan. My husband and I moved here in 2022, and in March it’ll be five years since we arrived. Like many Russians, we hadn’t planned to move before 2022. In the very first days of the invasion, we looked into where we could move without too much difficulty and chose Armenia because I didn’t have a passport for foreign travel. Honestly, until then I hadn’t even known you could go anywhere with just a Russian domestic passport.

Early in the invasion, someone reported me to the authorities over a comment in one of Gelendzhik’s Telegram chats. People in that chat used to get together to go to various rallies, and when I opened it after the invasion began, I saw people inviting others to a rally in support of the president. I was absolutely outraged, and I wrote a long comment about how much I hated them all. They were saying, “We need to support our heroes,” and I replied that the heroes were the people speaking out against the war. Then I left the chat.

In mid-May, on a Sunday night, the local police officer called me and said there’d been an anonymous complaint. He said, “Come down to the station right now.” I refused: It was nighttime, it was Sunday, and I was scared. The next day, I got another call. I was in the middle of changing my last name on my documents, and someone from the passport office said they’d made some kind of mistake and I needed to come in urgently.

We were planning to leave Russia in just a few days, so I decided to go and check everything. They looked at my documents and said everything was fine. I walked out, and a police officer was right there waiting for me: “Let’s go sign the offense report.” At first I said no, but he said that if I refused, he’d call in detectives and I’d be jailed for 15 days. Well, let’s go, then.

I got into the car and pressed the button in the chatbot run by [the human rights project] OVD-Info, and they sent me instructions. At the station, they asked me all sorts of questions about my views on the “special military operation” and so on. I wouldn’t say they treated me badly, but being at the station was still hard. You feel like you’re all alone in the world, like you’re a minority of one. But then I walked out, turned on my phone, and all these messages of support came flooding in: Earlier, I’d texted a friend that I’d been detained. People offered to help raise money to pay the fine and find a lawyer.

We left 10 days after I found out someone had reported me. I was really worried about whether I’d be able to leave at all, especially because just a day before we left, an acquaintance of mine was detained, cited for the same administrative offense, and threatened with never seeing her child again. But even after I left, law enforcement officers kept coming to [my] relatives’ homes and asking, “Has she come back?”

What do you love most about your new country?

I ended up choosing Armenia by chance. I needed to get out of Russia very quickly, and on Instagram I came across a repost with guides on how to leave quickly. Armenia and Kazakhstan were on the list. Armenia looked more appealing, partly because you could stay for a long time without a visa. Once we arrived in Armenia, I relaxed a little: People are treated completely differently here. You realize your troubles are over and things will only get better from here.

I felt it in the very first minutes after we landed. There was a sign at Zvartnots Airport that said, “Welcome home.” After such a stressful flight, when I hadn’t even known whether they’d let me leave the country, that sign really struck me. Then it turned out our virtual cards on Russia’s Mir payment system didn’t work, and we couldn’t withdraw cash from an ATM — we didn’t know all the workarounds for transferring money yet. We got to the hotel and told the owner, and she said, “Check in, get some sleep, then sort things out and pay.” That won me over, too. I knew right away that we’d be all right here.

What I love most about Armenia is the people. Everyone here is ready to help: If you treat the country with respect, Armenians can sense it. They’re open and always happy to point you in the right direction. Locals would give you the last of what they have because you’re a guest. Second is the scenery. I’m from the Krasnodar region, and it mattered to me to have mountains nearby. Just a little way outside Yerevan, you’re surrounded by beauty.

Yerevan itself is also a beautiful city, at least the center. It’s well laid out, it’s a pleasure to walk around, you can get everywhere on foot, and I love walking. It’s big, with everything a city should have, but it isn’t as noisy or exhausting. You can rent a place in a quiet neighborhood and live in peace. I’m from Gelendzhik, which has about 80,000 people, so having a subway and living in a city of a million was a pleasant surprise.

It’s also easy to find something you enjoy doing here: There are tons of clubs and classes for adults, because so many emigrants came and everyone started something new. Back when there were more emigrants — a lot of them later moved away — something was happening every day: festivals, networking events, workshops. I’d go and think, “Wow, can you really live like this, with so many interesting things happening around you all the time?”

What was hardest to accept in your new country?

I don’t really think in terms of “hard” or “I don’t like it.” I know I have two options: Quickly accept everything that’s happening, or make myself miserable. In 2022, I decided I needed to assimilate quickly. I brushed off the little difficulties of adjusting to everyday life: I’d think, I could be in prison, and I’m not, so everything’s great.

The way people think took a little getting used to. People in Armenia live at a very relaxed pace. If you call a repairman, there’s a good chance he won’t show up that same day. But once I relaxed, I realized I needed to accept that pace: If you live that way, too, everything will be great.

The hardest thing to accept was having been forced to leave in the first place, because I miss home so much. It helped that everyone here was in the same situation, and that Russians stick together.

Armenians always try to support us. In the first year, they didn’t always understand why we were here, and there was a lot of pro-Russian sentiment. Taxi drivers would often tell me they needed a leader like Putin. They were saying it to make a good impression on us. But over time, the conversations changed. It mattered to me that, even though they didn’t always understand why so many of us had come, they still tried to make us feel welcome.

What’s your favorite place in your new city?

I love the Cascade in Yerevan. Before we moved, I decided to google where we were going, because, I’m embarrassed to say, I knew nothing about Armenia or Yerevan. I saw the Cascade and thought, “Wow, we have to go there.”

When we first walked around Yerevan, the Cascade really impressed me. Unfortunately, it’s unfinished. I think they’re planning to finish it, but it’s still a lovely place. You can grab a coffee, sit down, and look at Mount Ararat when it’s visible.

I also go to every coffee shop there is in Yerevan. If a new one opens, I’m there on the first day. Especially if it’s dog-friendly — then I’ll definitely be there.

Outside the city, Lake Sevan really impressed me, and it still does whenever we go. Its sheer size and incredible beauty are amazing. It’s a place where you can really recharge: You can come, sit, think, and watch the water and the seagulls. I really miss the sea, and Sevan helps me miss it a little less.

What’s your favorite local food?

I love zhingyalov hats — it’s a flatbread stuffed with greens, with as many as 20 different kinds of herbs. And, of course, I love dolma. I could eat those two dishes every day. Armenian food is pretty heavy and meat-based overall, but dolma is so good. I don’t make it myself; I only order it.

I don’t like fancy restaurants. I prefer coffee shops and little cafés, often family-run. We mostly get Armenian food delivered; I’m not that keen on going out to eat. Of the small Armenian restaurants, I really like the café Konservatoriya in Dilijan. We go there sometimes. They have dolma, Armenian wines, really good coffee, and desserts.

Have you taken up any new hobbies since moving abroad?

Lots. I always have a lot going on; I need to be doing something all the time, and when you’ve emigrated, it also helps you get back on your feet emotionally. I’ve started writing a book about emigration. It’s about moving and the experiences I think all of us who emigrated in 2022 shared. I’ve already posted a few chapters for anyone to read, and lots of people have written to say it’s hard to read because they’re reliving it all. That means it’s well written.

I also volunteer: I rescue cats and dogs and find homes for them. It helps keep you grounded a little: The news leaves me with this constant background anxiety, and doing something useful makes it easier. Right now, I’m fostering a cat we took home from the forest because we couldn’t bear to leave him there. Sometimes I go to community cleanups. All of that helps you realize that your life is here and now.

When I’m inspired, I paint — whatever comes into my head. I have a blog about English, and I’ve made a lot of friends through it. I study languages: Over these four years, I’ve learned Spanish and started learning Armenian. It took me a long time to get around to it, but now I’m taking it seriously.

Have you managed to make new friends? How?

I have just one friend left in Russia. We’ve been friends since childhood — we’re like sisters. Keeping that friendship was really important to me, and I’m glad we’ve managed it.

My whole social circle has changed here, and I’m really happy about it, because the people who left are just amazing. Most of the people I meet here are really interesting and creative, with tons of projects and ideas. I’m an introvert, but I still managed to push myself to get out and meet people. In Yerevan, it was a bit like being kids in a sandbox: “Want to be friends?” “Sure.” All it took was sharing a couple of fundamental values, and suddenly you were best friends: Tomorrow you’re getting coffee, the day after you’re going somewhere else together. It all came easily because everyone needed people to talk to. I’m still friends with lots of them, people I’ve known almost since our first weeks abroad.

I’ve managed to make local friends, too. I met my first through helping animals, and the second and I bonded over coffee. Armenians are very open people; they’re always happy to meet someone new. I can strike up a conversation with someone in line at a coffee shop, and we’ll exchange contact information and make plans to get coffee. Talk for five minutes, and they might already invite you over. But that happens if you’re a nice, open person yourself: Then people treat you the same way.

Do you have enough money to live in your new country? How do you deal with financial difficulties?

We hadn’t planned to move, and we had no savings. We sold the car, which we still had a loan on, and afterward we had about $1,500 left. We used it to buy tickets, get the cat’s paperwork done, buy suitcases, and book a hotel — and in the end, we had about $500 left, no more.

I don’t know how we would’ve survived without the shelter run by Kovcheg. By sheer luck, I found out about it after we’d arrived, and I applied, but we didn’t hear back for a long time. Our hotel stay was almost over, and rents in Yerevan were high then. And it wasn’t just the prices: There simply weren’t any one-room apartments or studios available — they got snapped up so fast that renting anything was almost impossible. Then Kovcheg contacted us and offered us a place to stay. There, we teamed up with some other people who were looking for housing, too, and rented a big apartment together. It worked out pretty cheap.

Neither my husband nor I worked remotely. In Russia, I taught English in person at children’s centers. After I left, some of my students switched to online lessons with me, and I had to learn how to teach that way. The money barely covered anything: For the first few months, things were so bad that I had to choose between buying food for myself and buying it for the cat. Of course, we chose the cat: We’d brought him with us, and we owed him a good life. It was really hard, honestly. Sometimes I wondered whether we’d eat that day.

But I don’t spend much time dwelling on how hard things are. If it’s hard, I need to do something quickly to make it easier. We needed something to live on while my husband and I looked for work. So I started making videos about English on Instagram, thinking maybe someone would find me there. Gradually, the blog started growing, and since a lot of people had emigrated and needed English, things went pretty well. But that took a few months. Then my husband found a job, and things got a little easier, but for a while we were still on a very tight budget, counting every penny, and the exchange rate was really bad, too. Then the blog grew to a few thousand followers, rents fell, and things got much easier.

The first year and a half to two years were still tough. We rented awful apartments with terrible interiors that I’d never have lived in if we’d had enough money. We really had no luck with apartments. In those first months, I wasn’t thinking about what a great city this was: We didn’t have the chance to walk around and enjoy Yerevan; we were thinking about how to earn a living. Later, we got a taste of how lovely and fun it is here, and how good the food is. But even in those first months, when we were thinking about survival, I never considered giving it all up and going back.

What are you doing to learn the new language?

Not that much yet: I’ve downloaded various apps, and I’m learning how to write and say things. There’s one difficulty: For some reason, everyone speaks Russian to me. I try to say something in Armenian, and they switch to Russian because they want to make me feel comfortable. But I actually want to speak Armenian.

For now, I’m learning through apps, but I want to start lessons with a teacher: Personally, I need quick results, and a teacher gives me motivation — if I’ve paid, I have to study. Besides, Armenian varies a lot from city to city, so it would be important to me to study with a native speaker specifically from Yerevan.

How do you cope when you really miss home?

Writing the book helps me a lot: It helps me think a lot of things through. My main character is from my hometown, too, and I put my own feelings into the book, along with feelings that readers might relate to. It also helps to know that I’m needed here: I’m involved in activism — for example, I privately help LGBTQ people leave Russia, and I find homes for animals.

On my blog, I write about politics as well as English. I used to have a blog devoted entirely to feminism. I still run a low-cost English group for political emigrants who can’t afford lessons — that’s a small act of activism, too. When antiwar rallies were being held, we often went to the embassy with signs. We used to take things to a shelter for Ukrainians. A bit of everything, really: I do what I can.

When I lived in Russia, I felt like I was living under a concrete slab. It’s hanging over you, but it doesn’t crush you all at once — it does it little by little. They pass some law, and it presses down on you a little. Then you think, “Well, life goes on, everything’s fine.” Then it presses down a little more, and again. Here, that slab isn’t hanging over you, and you realize you can do whatever you want.

Sometimes homesickness still hits me. Then I read the news, and it passes pretty quickly. I also realize that I miss a home that no longer exists: It lives on in our memories. It’s great to have those memories, to be able to go back in your mind and spend a little time there. But then you need to be here.

Do you feel you’re losing your connection to your home country? Is it possible to keep it?

I don’t know if I ever had a connection to Russia as such. I miss the Krasnodar region, the sea, my relatives, and my friends, but I always wanted to leave Russia itself — just on my own terms. When I watched “Friends” as a kid, I thought, “Wow, what a great life they have. I want that, too.” I’d look at that New York apartment, while at home I had overhead storage cabinets and a rug on the wall — I wanted to leave so badly.

I keep in touch with my family, but not all of them: Some of my relatives are, let’s say, on the other side. But I have a grandmother I love very much. She supports me in everything I do, including emigrating, and we message each other almost every day. I have a wonderful godmother who always said I should live somewhere else. She’s an amazing woman who values freedom, and I really like her views. We talk from time to time.

I used to have two close friends, but unfortunately, it turned out that one of them and I saw things completely differently, and we couldn’t keep in touch. There are values that are fundamental to me, and in 2022, it became clear that a lot of people didn’t share them. She was one of those people. I decided I’d rather keep our friendship as a happy memory than fight, and we went our separate ways peacefully.

Are you happy living abroad?

I believe being happy is a choice. Here, bombs aren’t exploding over my head, it’s safe, and I can speak my mind. I have sad moments like everyone else, but overall I’m pretty happy, and I think I have a decent life.

I didn’t think I was unhappy even when we were sleeping on a mattress on the floor and had no money for food. First, I didn’t have time to think about it, and second, I was afraid: If I admitted to myself that I was unhappy, I’d fall apart and stop doing anything at all. That’s beating yourself up, and it’s really harmful. So every day, I choose to be a happy person that day, and that’s how I live.

How do you imagine returning home?

I’d definitely like to visit, see my grandmother and grandfather, and just walk around the places I grew up. But I’m not sure I could live in Russia. Even if the government changes and something happens, the people who report others to the authorities — the reason I left — will still be there, and I’d find it hard to live alongside them. So I’m more likely to picture coming back for vacations, maybe once a year, but probably not living in Russia permanently.

—

Armenians held captive in Baku subjected to torture and cruel treatment

Aysor, Armenia
Oct 19, 2026

Armenians held captive in Baku are subjected to torture and cruel treatment, according to findings and assessments by human rights defenders and various reports, writes Tigran Abrahamyan, a former Member of the National Assembly and member of the Republican Party of Armenia (RPA).

He noted that Siranush Sahakyan, who represents the interests of Armenian captives before the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), recently provided further details on the matter.

“The prompt repatriation of these individuals is critical, not only because their detention is entirely unlawful, but also because their lives and health are under constant threat. Given that the current regime in the Republic of Armenia has failed to put this issue on the agenda, the rights of these individuals continue to be completely violated, while official Baku exploits the issue as it sees fit, including using it against the Republic of Armenia,” Abrahamyan added.

—

COP17: The world has a plan to save nature. Is it working? (+Links to similar

Oct 17, 2026


17 October 2026 Climate and Environment

The UN Secretary-General has called for an end to the “war on nature”. On Monday, governments gathering in Yerevan, Armenia, will have to confront a more practical question: are they doing enough to win the peace and put the world’s biodiversity goals back on track?

COP17, the UN Biodiversity Conference, comes at a critical halfway point in the global effort to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. Running from 19 to 30 October, the meeting will take stock of progress, identify where countries are falling behind and, crucially, consider how to accelerate action over the next four years. 

Here’s what you need to know:

First things first: What is the global biodiversity framework?

The big picture: Think of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework as the world’s blueprint for halting and reversing the destruction of nature.

Agreed in 2022, it contains 23 targets for 2030 and four longer-term goals for 2050. It tackles the main drivers of biodiversity loss, including changes in how land and seas are used, unsustainable exploitation of species, climate change, pollution and invasive species. 

Its best known ambition is “30 by 30”: conserving 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030, the deadline for achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). 

But, the framework goes much further, including financing for biodiversity, reforming harmful incentives, encouraging more sustainable production and consumption and addressing businesses’ impacts and dependencies on nature. 

So, how are we doing?

Reality check: We’re not moving fast enough.

There has been movement. Nearly 90 per cent of the 196 parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity have established national biodiversity targets, close to 60 per cent have developed national biodiversity strategies and action plans and more than 70 per cent have submitted national reports. 

But, fewer than half of the national targets assessed by parties are on track. Ambition also remains short of the 30-by-30 goal, while major gaps persist in finance, capacity, cooperation and the data needed to track progress. 

As Secretary-General António Guterres told leaders in Yerevan on Friday: “Halfway to 2030, Yerevan is our moment of accountability.”

What’s actually on the table at COP17?

Why it matters: COP17 is essentially about moving from promises to delivery.

Among the big issues governments will grapple with:

  • Taking stock: Countries will undertake the first global review of collective progress under the framework, examining what has been achieved since 2022 and where faster action is needed. 
  • Closing the implementation gap: The question is how to translate national targets and plans into measurable results on the ground.
  • Finding the money: The framework calls for at least $200 billion annually from all sources by 2030, including at least $30 billion in international biodiversity finance, according to Armenia’s UN Ambassador Paruyr Hovhannisyan.
  • Making the Cali Fund work: Governments will have an opportunity to advance practical arrangements for the fund, designed to support fair and equitable benefit-sharing from commercial use of digital sequence information on genetic resources.
  • Tracking progress: Better monitoring, data, capacity and cooperation are needed so countries can measure whether commitments are actually delivering results. 
  • Changing the economics: Some of the areas furthest behind require action outside environment ministries, including on finance, business, sustainable consumption and harmful incentives.

Yerevan’s test

For host Armenia, success means COP17 becoming both a “review COP” and an “implementation COP”.

“We cannot treat 2030 as a distant deadline,” Ambassador Hovhannisyan told UN News. “Decisions taken in Yerevan must help close the gap between commitments and results on the ground.”

Hambardzum Matevosyan, Armenia’s Environment Minister and incoming COP17 president, puts the progression simply: COP15 produced the framework and COP16 advanced mechanisms to implement it. COP17, he said, must establish “where we stand, what is working, where progress is falling short and what must change”. 

The bottom line

Biodiversity can sound abstract. Its loss is anything but.

As António Guterres reminded leaders on Friday, the food we eat, the water we drink and the air we breathe depend on it. The question in Yerevan is whether countries can turn an ambitious global agreement into action quickly enough.

On Thursday, launching a major UN report evaluating global progress under the landmark Kunming framework, Astrid Schomaker, executive secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity, distilled the challenge: “We know where we stand. We know where the gaps are. Now, we must work together to close them.”


https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/10/1168618


ALSO READ

Protecting Earth’s fragile biodiversity takes spotlight at Armenia talks


COP17 opens in Armenia with global biodiversity goals still off track  

https://sustainabilityonline.net/news/cop17-opens-in-armenia-with-global-biodiversity-goals-still-off-track/

UN biodiversity conference opens in Armenia amid nature reality check
https://streamlinefeed.co.ke/news/un-biodiversity-conference-opens-in-armenia-amid-nature-reality-check
UN Biodiversity Summit Opens in Armenia as Nations Confront Missed Nature Targets
UN Biodiversity Conference in Armenia will negotiate about ways to boost implementation of biodiversity targets
COP17 opens in Armenia for global progress review
Nations meet at COP17 in Armenia in race to salvage global biodiversity targets
UN Biodiversity Conference opens in Armenia as report warns of slow progress towards 2030 targets
CBD COP17: Key issues as UN biodiversity talks kick off in Armenia
Cop17 at a glance: everything you need to know about the UN’s nature summit
What Is COP17? UN Biodiversity Summit Begins in Armenia as Nations Face Key Questions
UN Biodiversity Conference: World gathers in Armenia to ‘save’ nature


—

Azerbaijani exports to Armenia in 2026 reach almost $23.5 million

OC Media
Oct 19, 2026

Azerbaijani exports to Armenia in the first nine months of 2026 amounted to a total value of $23.45 million, the pro-government media outlet APA reported on Monday, citing data from the State Customs Committee. The figure accounted for 0.10% of Azerbaijan’s total exports. Nonetheless, the rather modest total marked a significant increase from the previous year, which was less than $1 million.

The growing trade ties between Armenia and Azerbaijan began in 2025, following the Washington summit, which brought together President Donald Trump, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev.

The summit resulted in an agreement to establish the Trump Route, a proposed transport link connecting Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan through Armenian territory. It also included the initialling, but not the signing, of a peace treaty to end decades of bloody conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The bulk of the Azerbaijani exports has been fuel and grain, much of which came from third-party countries.

Armenian exports to Azerbaijan began in September 2026, with a shipment of aluminum foil. In total, Armenia’s exports to Azerbaijan in 2026 have remained relatively minimal, with APA reporting on Monday that the total value for the first nine months of the year was $96,460.

—

Armenian court rejects Security Council Secretary Simonyan’s defamation suit a

OC Media
Oct 19, 2026

Armenia’s court of appeals dismissed a defamation lawsuit by Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan against opposition Strong Armenia MP Edgar Ghazaryan, according to the Datalex court database.

This is not the first time Simonyan has taken his critiques to the court. Simonyan has filed a series of defamation suits against critics and media outlets when he was parliamentary speaker in the previous parliament. In 2023, he sued the news website MediaHub.am over a report that the government had signed a deal with his brother’s company without a tender. In October 2025, he filed a suit against the Oragir.newswebsite, seeking ֏800,000 ($2,200) in compensation over a street-interview video recalling an incident in which he allegedly ordered security staff to seize a passerby.

The suit concerned a video published on 9 March by the outlet 168.am, titled ‘Family corruption: A thematic conversation with Edgar Ghazaryan’. The reports do not say which statements in the video Simonyan contested. Simonyan had asked the court to order Ghazaryan to post a retraction on Facebook for at least five working days. The text was to be headlined ‘I, Edgar Ghazaryan, slandered Alen Simonyan’. He also sought ֏2 million ($5,500) in compensation and ֏560,000 ($1,500) in legal costs.

Ghazaryan responded to the court decision on Facebook.

‘The Republic of Armenia also benefited from all this, receiving ֏80,000 ($220). I hope that Alen Simonyan exercises his right to appeal the verdict to the Civil Court of Appeal of Armenia — so that he may lose there as well and pay an additional state duty to the state’, he wrote. Simonyan did not respond to the decision or Ghazaryan’s post.

Earlier this year, Simonyan sued former President Robert Kocharyan, seeking over ֏2 million ($5,500)  over an ‘offensive statement’ made at a press briefing on 29 January.

Not all of his suits have failed. In a separate case, a court ordered journalist Ani Gevorgyan to retract her claims about Simonyan and pay him AMD ֏150,000 ($400)

Ghazaryan and Simonyan have crossed paths in court before when in January 2024, Simonyan sued Angela Tovmasyan, editor of the website hayeli.am, after she spoke at a press conference by Ghazaryan. She said that Simonyan had in the past ‘run under the feet’ of businessperson Khachatur Sukiasyan. He demanded an apology and ֏1 million ($2,300)

—

Iran joins two-week biodiversity negotiations at COP17 in Armenia

TEHRAN TIMES, Iran
Oct 19, 2026

Iran joins two-week biodiversity negotiations at COP17 in Armenia

  1. Society
October 19, 2026 – 15:12

TEHRAN – Iran is participating in the 17th Conference of the Parties (COP17) to the Convention on Biological Diversity in Armenia with a delegation of experts and academics led by Hamid Zohrabi, deputy head of the Department of Environment.

The two-week negotiations, which began on Sunday, will be held in two stages: technical-level discussions followed by the ministerial segment.

The leaders’ summit took place last Friday, featuring an address by President Masoud Pezeshkian. It marked the first time a president of the Islamic Republic of Iran had attended a Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Addressing the summit, Pezeshkian called for “peace diplomacy” to protect biodiversity, condemning the devastating environmental impact of wars of aggression as ecocide and urging the international community to establish effective, transparent and enforceable mechanisms to safeguard natural heritage during wartime.

Pezeshkian described environmental cooperation as a bridge between nations, stressing that biodiversity conservation could serve as an important pillar of “peace diplomacy.”

“In a region facing security crises stemming from the illegal and expansionist presence of powers, as well as climate change, water scarcity and ecosystem degradation, environmental cooperation can build bridges between nations,” he said.

Such cooperation, he added, can pave the way for peace and security for all, peace with nature, and a future in which human life is aligned and in harmony with the natural world.

“Today, we stand at a pivotal moment in history when biodiversity is no longer merely a scientific or environmental concern. It is also an issue of peace and security, human health, food and water security, and intergenerational justice for all the inhabitants of our planet,” Pezeshkian stressed.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran was among the first countries to recognize the legal and international significance of this issue and become a party to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). However, Iran’s relationship with biodiversity goes far beyond its membership in an international convention.

With an ancient tradition of living in harmony with nature and an extraordinary diversity of ecosystems, species and genetic resources, Iran is the custodian of an invaluable and irreplaceable natural wealth. This heritage is the result of millions of years of evolution, natural dynamism and adaptation, and is reflected in the culture, customs, livelihoods, indigenous knowledge and historical identity of the people of this land.

Owing to its exceptional geographical location, Iran lies at the intersection of several biogeographical regions. From the Hyrcanian and Arasbaran forests to the Zagros Mountains, and from arid and desert landscapes to the coasts of the Persian Gulf, the Sea of Oman and the Caspian Sea, Iran is home to thousands of plant and animal species, as well as valuable genetic resources. These natural assets underpin the country’s ecological stability and sustainability, provide a vital foundation for water and food security and human health, strengthen resilience to natural hazards, and serve as a cornerstone of sustainable development.

Shina Ansari, the head of the Department of Environment, also addressed the meeting, saying that environmental diplomacy can become an instrument of peace diplomacy, while the relationship between biodiversity, peace, and security should be viewed as a two-way relationship.

Ansari added the link between biodiversity and peace was not merely an ethical or political issue, but a fundamental concern in environmental governance, international law, and human security.

Under the Convention on Biological Diversity, she said, the main drivers of biodiversity loss are generally understood to include land-use change, habitat destruction, pollution, unsustainable exploitation of natural resources, and climate change.

COP17 is being held From 19 to 30 October under the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, alongside the Twelfth meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CP-MOP-12) and the Sixth meeting of the Parties to the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization (NP-MOP-6).

At the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit) in Rio de Janeiro, world leaders agreed on a comprehensive strategy for sustainable development aimed at ensuring a healthy and productive planet for future generations. One of the Summit’s landmark achievements was the adoption of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

Signed by the vast majority of the world’s countries, the Convention establishes commitments to conserve the foundations of the Earth’s ecosystems while pursuing economic development. Its objectives are the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of its components, and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources. These objectives are pursued through appropriate access to genetic resources, the transfer of relevant technologies—taking into account all rights over those resources and technologies—and the provision of adequate financial resources, in accordance with the Convention’s provisions.

—

Opinion | The irony of COP17 host Armenia celebrating gold before biodiversity

OC Media
Oct 18, 2026

Armenia re-opened the controversial Amulsar mine just days before COP17, featuring the tagline ‘taking action for nature’, kicked off in Yerevan.

From 19–30 October, Armenia will host the 17th UN Biodiversity Conference (COP17) in Yerevan. This year, the official slogan is ‘Taking action for nature’.

Yet just nine days before the conference opened, on 10 October, the Armenian government officially launched mining operations at the Amulsar gold mine. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan himself attended the opening ceremony near the spa town of Jermuk, claiming that the absence of protests around the opening proved that public concerns had been resolved.

Civil society organisations and environmental activists, however, have accused the Pashinyan administration of deliberately keeping the ceremony out of public view, arguing that the event had not been announced, so no one could gather to protest.

Controversial Amulsar gold mine opens in Armenia after long delay

At the same time, they have criticised the government’s heightened support for the Amulsar project, especially in the run-up to COP17, arguing that promoting mining in a sensitive ecological region contradicts Armenia’s international biodiversity commitments.

Indeed, while the government promotes a green agenda globally, local communities and environmental experts warn that the mine threatens endangered wildlife and vital water systems.

Removing ‘biodiversity obstacles’ by government decision

In March 2020, a coalition of Armenian and international environmental organisations, including Bankwatch, filed a complaint with the Secretariat of the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. They argued that the Amuslar mine directly threatened endangered wildlife and affects three candidate sites of the Emerald Network (a network of areas of special conservation interest set up under the Convention): Djermuk Area, Gorhajk Area, and Sevan National Park. The complaint notes that the area affected by the mine is home to a number of species listed as ‘strictly protected fauna’ under the Bern Convention, including the Persian leopard, bezoar goat, brown bear, Eurasian otter, and Eurasian lynx, and that mining would lead to habitat destruction and fragmentation of wildlife populations along the Amulsar mountain corridor.

Despite initial promises to abide by the findings of an independent, state-commissioned environmental audit, Pashinyan’s administration has repeatedly and actively promoted the Amulsar mine, disregarding any critical findings which highlighted flawed data on flora and fauna and the lack of biodiversity action and monitoring plans.

By late 2024, the government had acquired a 12.5% stake in Lydian Armenia, the company operating the mine, and in early 2025, it approved a $150 million state guarantee for loans from a local bank. In the meantime, Pashinyan’s administration disregarded the results of a government-commissioned international environmental audit. The 13-point document officially drafted in 2019 by the Ministry of Environment outlined instances of non-compliance and gaps in the Amulsar environmental impact assessment.

Podcast | The Amulsar mine returns

Yet the environmental setbacks began over a decade ago. In one of the most important instances, in July 2014, the Armenian government adopted a decision to allow developers to relocate endangered plant species. Some critics have suggested this was designed to clear the way for the Amulsar gold mine by sidestepping domestic biodiversity conservation law. Although the Armenian Mining Code explicitly prohibits mining on land that is home to plant or animal species listed in Armenia’s Red Book, the decision authorised the relocation of Red Book plants such as Potentilla porphyrantha, which grows in the project area.

The timing of the decision was highly suspicious: it was adopted less than a month before the public hearing on the project’s environmental impact assessment. Without this legal loophole, the Amulsar mine may not have been able to proceed. By allowing endangered species to be moved to artificial ‘plant zoos’, the government undermined its own domestic laws as well as international treaties such as the Bern Convention, which protect the habitats of threatened species, not just individual plants.

Notably, the company itself pointed to the decision as a way around these legal barriers.

During a public hearing in the village Gndevaz in August 2014, the company responded to my question about Red Book plant and animal species by stating that the government had adopted a decision the prior month allowing such plants to be relocated from the Amulsar mining zone. As I argued at the time, I believe the decision was passed specifically to help the company bypass environmental protection laws and clear the area for mining infrastructure.

Offsetting on paper, not in practice

At the same time, both the government and COP’s formal agenda have highlighted biodiversity offsetting and market instruments such as private ‘nature credits’ as a method to protect biodiversity. In reality, however, these efforts risk legitimising efforts by corporations and banks to greenwash the loss of endangered habitats rather than halting ecological destruction at the source. Indeed, Target 19 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Diversity Framework, which calls for more finance from all sources, explicitly encourages ‘innovative schemes’ such as biodiversity offsets and credits. Armenia’s own experience shows how such schemes can play out in practice.

In December 2016, Lydian Armenia and the Ministry of Nature Protection signed a Memorandum of Understanding to establish Jermuk National Park as an offset for permanent ecosystem damage on Amulsar mountain, with the company pledging more than $5 million over five years. But the park’s boundaries were later redrawn to exclude the mine.

In October 2023, the Armenian government reported to the Bern Convention that the initiative to establish Jermuk National Park had been postponed due to ‘prevailing state priorities and regional instability’.

Then there is the Djermuk Area candidate Emerald site, which featured proposals to protect the whole area on the basis of a 2012 World Wildlife Fund-backed feasibility study. Now, once again, the government is proposing to cut Amulsar mountain out of that site too, so that it matches the smaller park.

In the case of the Teghut open-pit copper and molybdenum mine in northern Armenia, compensation for lost nature also failed. The mine required the felling of 357 hectares of rich forest, including 128,000 trees. Under the original project terms, the developer, Vallex Group, pledged to plant twice as many trees in adjacent areas to offset the ecological loss. Rather than carrying out the planting and long-term care itself, its subsidiary Teghout CJSC set up a tender committee to outsource the work. Environmental watchdogs and local groups long contended that the afforestation efforts fell short or failed. In 2019, the Prosecutor General’s Office opened a criminal case after state forest monitoring found that most of the trees planted on 132 hectares had not survived, even though officials of the state forestry agency Hayantar (ArmForest), which was contracted to do the work, had recorded it as complete. The case also found that the responsible ministries had failed to supervise the restoration.

All of these approaches are at odds with Article 9 of the Bern Convention, which sets out the only exceptions allowed from the protection of species — for example, in the interests of public health and safety, air safety, or other overriding public interests — and only where there is no other satisfactory solution. Offsetting the damage done by a gold mine is not one of them.

In April 2025, the Bern Convention’s monitoring committee reiterated its request for a new environmental impact assessment that considers all the species and habitats present in the area and asked the authorities to ‘suspend any permits for the exploitation of subsoil’ until the new assessment had been completed. The Armenian government disregarded the requests, maintaining in its September 2026 report to the Convention that the existing environmental impact assessment’s conclusion and national permits remain legally valid.

Notably, it is only now, on the eve of COP17, that the Jermuk National Park concept has been revived, with the government announcing at the mine’s launch that Lydian would put $5 million towards it — the same sum the company pledged a decade ago.

Armenian opposition questions state’s $51 million spending on COP17

In August 2026, Lydian and the government also signed a community development agreement for the Amulsar project. Under it, the company will pay $7 million or $9 million a year to affected communities, depending on the price of gold, through a new foundation. The arrangement goes beyond the social contributions mining companies are legally required to make, and risks becoming a new instrument that makes communities dependent on the company’s money.

At COP17, several events in the official negotiation venue will focus on the Bern Convention, bringing together country delegates, the Convention Secretariat, and accredited experts to discuss how to protect wild flora and fauna and their natural habitats. It is worth asking the Armenian representatives how they plan to address their persistent disregard for their Bern Convention commitments while simultaneously ‘taking action’ to protect biodiversity during their two-year COP presidency.

—