Belgian PM Bart De Wever offers resignation to King Philippe

Europe14:58, 2 November 2026
Read the article in: ՀայերենРусский

Belgium’s Prime Minister Bart De Wever was at the royal palace on Monday morning to offer his government’s resignation to King Philippe following failed overnight budget talks, Euronews reported.

It comes after overnight negotiations with his core cabinet on the budget failed to reach an agreement.

De Wever left the palace after meeting with King Philippe for around 1.5 hours without addressing the press.

Following the meeting, the king announced he “is taking his decision under consideration and will consult the chairs of the various coalition parties from tomorrow.”

He added that he regrets that no agreement has been reached and that the country cannot afford a prolonged political crisis.

He calls on all parties involved “to put the general interest and a willingness to compromise first”. De Wever is set to meet with the king again on Friday.

According to Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot, there were “too many sticking points”. “If I were to list all the sticking points, it would take an eternity,” he told Belgian media.

The government must save €10 billion to stay within EU spending limits.

The budget deficit amounted to 5% last year, while a deficit of a maximum of 3% is permitted under European rules.

The Belgian national debt amounts to over €735 billion, more than 110% of Belgium’s GDP, while 60% is permitted.

Due to the failure to reach an agreement, interest rates on government bonds have increased, and Belgium has to pay more to meet its debt obligations.

If the King accepts De Wever’s resignation, new elections will be called.

Belgium’s coalition government is made up of De Wever’s conservative N-VA, liberals MR, centrists Les Engagés, socialists Vooruit and Christian Democrats CD&V.

Deputy Prime Minister David Clarinval blamed the socialist Vooruit for the failed talks as they insisted on their position for higher taxes.

Matti Vandemaele of opposition party Groen said “Prime Minister De Wever is failing to get his government on the same page, unless everyone follows his N-VA programme.”

Read the article in: ՀայերենРусский

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Iotova wins Bulgaria’s presidential election runoff

Europe09:51, 2 November 2026
Read the article in: ՀայերենРусский

Iliana Iotova and her running mate Kiril Valchev have won Bulgaria’s November 1 presidential election runoff, receiving 57.66% of the vote.

According to the Bulgarian News Agency (BTA), Iotova, Bulgaria’s acting president, and Valchev, director-general of BTA, secured victory over the other presidential and vice-presidential candidates, Andrey Gurov and Georgi Kandev, who received 39.38% of the vote.

The Central Election Commission (CEC) announced the preliminary results after processing 99.68% of polling station election commission protocols. The data were reported as of 5:00 a.m. on November 2.

A total of 1,091,206 voters cast their ballots for Iotova and Valchev, while 745,303 voted for Gurov and Kandev.

Another 55,938 voters selected the “None of the above” option.

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

COP17’s results to become more evident over the next two years: Simon Papyan

Armenia16:08, 2 November 2026
Read the article in: ՀայերենРусский

An environmental expert has said that Armenia’s hosting of the 17th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP17) to the Convention on Biological Diversity will be of great importance for the country’s environmental policy, public attitudes, and environmental protection efforts, with its actual impact expected to become evident over the next two years, during Armenia’s presidency of the process.

Environmental expert and former Deputy Minister of Nature Protection Simon Papyan made the remarks in an interview with Armenpress, commenting on the organization of COP17, the issues discussed, the significance of the conference for Armenia, and the country’s priority environmental challenges.

“Holding the Conference of the Parties to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity was a very responsible undertaking for us, because an environmental event of this scale had never been held in Armenia before. I can say that we came through this test with honor. I am impressed both by the organizational work and by the way the conference was conducted,” Papyan said.

Addressing the discussions held as part of the conference, Papyan noted that their main topic was biodiversity conservation, but that they also covered numerous other areas related to environmental protection.

“Since biodiversity is one of the components of an ecosystem, issues such as water resources, air pollution, forest conservation, and other matters were naturally also discussed, in terms of their interconnection with biodiversity. The discussions focused not only on biodiversity conservation but also on the sustainable use of natural resources and financing issues,” he said.

Papyan recalled that the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework was adopted in 2022, setting a number of important targets that the world must achieve by 2030.

“One of the most important targets is that at least 30 percent of the planet’s terrestrial and aquatic areas must be under protection by 2030. This refers to specially protected natural areas, including nature reserves and sanctuaries. Another important target is the restoration of at least 30 percent of degraded ecosystems. However, progress remains limited, and there are serious challenges to address in this regard,” he stressed.

In Papyan’s assessment, it is still too early to draw final conclusions about the conference’s results, as implementing the adopted decisions requires ongoing work.

“It is still too early to speak about the overall results of COP17. They will become clearer over the next two years, while Armenia presides over the process, because the decisions adopted at COP17 must be put into practice during that period,” he said.

Speaking about the significance of the conference for Armenia, Papyan singled out changes in environmental attitudes as the foremost priority.

“I believe this conference will have a serious impact on our environmental mindset. This applies not only to decision-makers, most of whom took part in various discussions, delivered speeches, and sought to contribute to biodiversity conservation, but also to society as a whole, starting with schoolchildren. It is very important that our attitude toward the animal and plant worlds changes,” Papyan said.

He stressed that human activity is one of the main causes of negative impacts on nature.

“Animals and plants do not take more from nature than they need. Humans, however, often upset this balance and have a negative impact on the environment through their activities. One of the key objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity is to reduce the negative impact of human activities, including economic activities. This is a very important and, at the same time, difficult challenge to address,” he said.

According to Papyan, another important factor for Armenia is its presidency of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.

“Over the next two years, Armenia will preside over this process, and we must set an example for other countries by showing how we are moving forward with the implementation of the targets set for 2030. Naturally, everyone’s attention will be focused on Armenia. We will be asked: as the presiding country, how are you implementing these commitments in your own country? I hope that, as a result of all this, the overall state of the environment in Armenia will improve,” he stressed.

According to him, the balanced use of natural resources is of particular importance in biodiversity conservation.

Addressing Armenia’s priority environmental challenges, he singled out the restoration and preservation of Lake Sevan’s ecological balance as the foremost issue.

“Our top environmental priority is restoring and preserving Lake Sevan’s ecological balance. This is the most important issue because Lake Sevan is significant to us not only environmentally and socioeconomically but is also a key component of national security. We must protect it as the apple of our eye,” he stressed.

The second important area, according to Papyan, is forest conservation and restoration. “Taking climate change into account as well, we must pay great attention to forest conservation, preventing illegal logging, and reforestation efforts. This is a very important area.”

The expert also highlighted the need for the efficient and prudent use of water resources.

“If we do not use our water resources prudently, we will face serious problems. Prudent use means not only efficiently managing water quantities in households, industry, and other sectors, but also addressing pollution issues. We have serious problems when it comes to wastewater treatment,” Papyan noted.

According to him, certain investments are already being made in this area, and one of the priorities is treating wastewater flowing into Lake Sevan and improving the lake’s water quality. Papyan also addressed air pollution in cities, describing it as one of the important environmental challenges.

He stressed that effectively addressing environmental problems requires not only the work of government bodies but also the active participation of the private sector.

Papyan also emphasized the importance of international cooperation, particularly in the areas of financial assistance, the introduction of new technologies, and technology transfer.

Addressing the conservation of land resources, he stressed that land degradation is also one of Armenia’s major environmental challenges.

“The issue of land is very important because its restoration is a lengthy process. For example, 30 percent of the land in the Ararat Valley is degraded, and there are also serious salinization problems. For this reason, efforts to conserve and restore land must receive special attention,” Papyan said.

Concluding his remarks, he expressed hope that holding COP17 and Armenia’s presidency over the next two years would contribute to the development of the country’s environmental policy, more efficient use of natural resources, and improvement of the state of the environment.

COP17 took place in Yerevan from October 19 to 31, 2026. It was held alongside the 12th meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CP-MOP-12) and the sixth meeting of the Parties to the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing (NP-MOP-6).

COP17 marked the first global review of collective progress toward implementing the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF).

Read the article in: ՀայերենРусский

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

“I hope to send an Armenian into space one day”: Kam Ghaffarian on the future

Science09:00, 2 November 2026
Read the article in: ՀայերենРусскийTürkçe

The nearest star to us beyond the Solar System lies more than four light-years away from Earth. At the speeds achieved by today’s spacecraft, it would take thousands of years to reach it. Yet Kam Ghaffarian, an Iranian-born American engineer and entrepreneur who has devoted much of his career to turning ambitious ideas into technological ventures, envisions a very different timeframe for such a journey: just six months. Such a claim contradicts our current understanding of physics. The assertion that humans could reach Proxima Centauri in just six months should be treated as a proposition that still needs to be substantiated through scientific calculations, independent scientific review and, ultimately, experimentation. Nevertheless, it reflects the scale of Ghaffarian’s ambitions and his determination to push the boundaries of what we consider possible.

Kam Ghaffarian will arrive in Yerevan in the coming days to receive Armenia’s 2026 State Award for Global Contribution to Humanity through High-Tech. His decades-long career spans a wide range of fields, from developing innovative nuclear energy solutions to advancing commercial space exploration.

As the co-founder and executive chairman of X-energy, he is working to advance nuclear technologies that could provide power both on Earth, particularly for the new artificial intelligence data centers under construction, and for spacecraft involved in space exploration.

Another company he co-founded, Axiom Space, aims to build a commercial space station by the end of this decade, ahead of the planned retirement of the International Space Station. Through yet another company he co-founded, Intuitive Machines, Ghaffarian has helped bring commercial lunar exploration into a new era. In February 2024, the company’s Odysseus lunar lander became the first commercial spacecraft to achieve a soft landing on the Moon and the first U.S. spacecraft to reach the lunar surface since Apollo 17 in 1972.

Ghaffarian’s fascination with space began much earlier, during his childhood, when he witnessed the Apollo 11 Moon landing. The event had a profound influence on his choice of career. Decades later, that childhood inspiration has evolved into a far-reaching ambition: to make space more accessible, develop new sources of energy and ultimately take humanity beyond the boundaries of the Solar System.

In an interview with Armenpress on the sidelines of the STARMUS VIII festival, held on the Spanish island of Tenerife, Ghaffarian also spoke about the possibility of sending an Armenian astronaut into space, saying he could help make this ambitious undertaking a reality. In his view, such an achievement would represent not only a significant technological milestone for Armenia but also a source of inspiration for an entire generation.

Armenpress: I couldn’t help noticing your surname, so I have to ask: do you have any Armenian ancestry?

Kam Ghaffarian: I believe that. I was born in Iran, I’m Iranian, of course, but yeah, some of the family members, I believe, have Armenian [roots]. That’s where my name is, Ghaffarian. That’s why I am looking forward to visiting Armenia. 

You’re investing in a future where people can live and work in space. From where we stand today, how realistic is that vision, and how soon could it become a reality?

It’s very realistic that we’re going to create an environment where people will be working and living in space sooner than you believe. I mean, people have been living onboard the space station for the last 26 years, right? I was one of the people who was involved in developing the space station. When the astronauts from space talked to Houston, they would say, “Houston, we have a problem,” or whatever, they were my company employees that responded.

This is growing really, really fast, and I think that there are going to be more people living and working in space on a regular basis.

You mentioned the space station. We know that the International Space Station will end its operations by the end of 2030, and Axiom Space is working on a commercial space station. Who do you envision using this new station? Will it primarily serve governments and researchers, or will there also be room for private individuals who want to experience life in orbit?

All of the above. You know, we’re going to be working with a lot of governments.  So today the International Space Station belongs to, of course, NASA, which is the United States, Russia, European countries, Japan, and Canada, right? So in the future, it’s going to belong to the private industry, like Axiom Space. And then we will have people who will buy services from us. The United States will be one of our anchor tenants, but European countries — hopefully Armenia, many other countries. Hopefully one day I take an Armenian astronaut. I took a Turkish astronaut to space. And, you know, taking the astronaut to space inspires the whole population.

So when I go there, I’m hoping that I will persuade the Armenian government to say ‘we’re going to send an Armenian to space,’ sponsored by the government, and I can help with that.

In the future, all the governments will buy services from us, but also commercial, because we’re going to do manufacturing in space of things that it’s not possible to do on Earth. And then you’re going to have private astronauts that go to space and it’s a platform to go to other places in the solar system.

When do you think commercial space exploration will be able to operate independently of governments? At the moment, most companies in the sector rely on government contracts or partnerships. Do you see a future in which private companies can operate entirely on their own?

I believe so. It’s okay to have government as a customer. I mean, Apple, for example, or Google, they’re commercial companies. Government is just one of their customers. Airlines are commercial airlines, but government can come buy services. So in the future, it will be like that. It’s a commercial entity. One of our customers is going to be government, but it’s not the only one.

Coming back to Axiom Space, are you planning to build a completely new space station from scratch, or will you use existing infrastructure already in orbit?

No, we’re going to start brand new. We are doing it right now.

Have you already started?

Oh, yeah. We’re building everything, but we’ll be launching our space station in 2028 to 2029 timeframe.

And how big is it going to be?

The current space station, the way it was built, it was not modular. The way we’re designing ours is going to be very modular, so that each module is on its own. We can have 50 modules, 60 modules, 100 modules that are connected like Legos together. They’re interconnected. But once one module goes bad, we can deorbit that module and send another one out.

Will you be relying on companies like SpaceX to support your missions?

Yes, of course. We are currently using SpaceX, but we’re going to be working with many other companies.

In your view, what should be humanity’s ultimate destination in space?

The ultimate destiny for humanity I believe it’s to go to other stars. Not our solar system, but beyond our solar. Humanity’s destiny is to become interstellar. The ultimate destiny.

But with current technologies, it is impossible.

It is possible, but we need more time to develop more engineering, more science.

But it’s a one-way direction, right?

No, not necessarily, if we develop technology. Because you see, like, for example, if you want to go to our closest star Proxima Centauri, Proxima Centauri is 4 and a quarter light years. The distance from one part of our galaxy to another is 100,000 light years. So just go 4 and a quarter. If we go with the nuclear technology, it takes 2,000 years? And if you go with the nuclear fusion technology, it might take 100 years. We want to do it such a way you can go in 6 months.

Is it even possible?

Yes. We’re working on it.

What excites you most about space exploration?

What excites me is how it unifies humanity, how it brings us together. I believe that we become so divisive, and tribal. Everything is a separation from religion or country or national birth or political party. What excites me is to bring the whole humanity together, and we realize that we all really are one.

Don’t you think that even in that case politics could still get in the way…

Yeah, but I think if we want to be interstellar, I want you to imagine this. We go outside our solar system, and in our galaxy called Milky Way, there are 400 billion stars. We’re just one star. And there are so many other planets, and it’s 100,000 years across. Let’s say we leave our galaxy behind. There are 2 trillion other galaxies. 2 trillion. Just — just think about this.

When my son was 8 years old, he asked me, “Dad, how vast is the universe?” So I gave him what Carl Sagan said, which is, if you look at all the oceans on Earth, all the deserts everywhere, right, and look at all the grains of sand everywhere, our solar system is just one grain.

Just think how vast the universe is. And I think our destiny is to go and explore that, and go there.

 

The Armenpress coverage of the STARMUS festival is supported by Team Telecom Armenia.

Read the article in: ՀայերենРусскийTürkçe

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Armenia To Retain Full Customs Authority Under TRIPP

Eurasia Review
Nov 2, 2026
  • Armenia’s State Revenue Committee chairman Eduard Hakobyan stated that all customs functions under the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP) project remain fully within Armenian state sovereignty.
  • An international operator may perform limited front-office functions to help build trust, but decisions on inspections and risk analysis will be made exclusively by Armenian customs officers, with the operator’s exact scope still under discussion.
  • Armenia is independently advancing customs digitalization and e-Gate integration to reduce direct contact with officers, while the National Assembly ratified the Armenia-U.S. TRIPP strategic cooperation framework on 28 October.

All customs functions under the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP) project remain entirely within the scope of Armenia’s state sovereignty, Eduard Hakobyan, chairman of the State Revenue Committee (SRC), said when addressing the potential involvement of an operator in customs procedures.

He noted that involving an international operator to perform front-office functions could also help address issues of trust, Sputnik Armenia reports.

“The need for this is not particularly compelling, but it does exist to some extent,” he said.

The SRC chairman added that the precise scope of the operator’s front-office responsibilities is still under discussion and will be established in the relevant agreement and documentation.

“If risks are identified during the customs clearance of cargo and an inspection becomes necessary, the relevant decision will be made exclusively by a customs officer.

“It is the customs officer who makes that decision, and the front office cannot make such a decision. Armenia retains all its customs functions. This means that we will analyze the risks and conduct the inspections ourselves,” he stated.

Asked whether a similar trust-building mechanism was envisaged for Armenian citizens traveling through Azerbaijani territory, Hakobyan replied that he was not familiar with the Azerbaijani side’s model for organizing customs operations.

The SRC chairman added that the digitalization of Armenia’s customs service is continuing independently of the launch of TRIPP.

A new digital platform is being developed for integration with the e-Gate system, with the aim of minimizing direct contact between citizens and customs officers.

On October 28, Armenia’s National Assembly ratified the framework agreement on strategic cooperation between Armenia and the U.S. concerning the TRIPP project.

—

Iran and Armenia: A Bond Beyond Neighborly Ties

Tehran Times, Iran
Nov 2, 2026
By Hessam Heidarzadeh

Iran and Armenia: A Bond Beyond Neighborly Ties

  1. Culture
November 2, 2026 – 21:25

TEHRAN- At first glance, what connects Iran and Armenia may appear to be geographical proximity and the geopolitical considerations that come with it. A closer look at the history and culture of the two countries, however, reveals a relationship that goes far beyond the conventional ties between neighboring states. For centuries, Iran and Armenia have not merely existed side by side; they have been part of each other’s historical, cultural, and social developments. This shared presence can be traced in architecture, language, art, social traditions, and even the collective memory of their peoples. These ties have endured despite changing political borders and shifts in power.

One of the most intriguing examples of this historical interconnection can be found at the Garni Temple, one of Armenia’s most important historical landmarks. As one of the few surviving examples of classical architecture from antiquity in the Caucasus, the temple is more than an ancient monument belonging to Armenian history. Its walls bear traces of different languages and cultures. Epigraphic research has identified inscriptions in Kufic script, as well as an inscription in Persian written in the Naskh script, at the site. Some of these inscriptions date back to the ninth and tenth centuries. Among them is a Persian inscription attributed to Bahram, a stonemason from Tabriz. These details offer a clear indication of the extent to which Iranian language and culture were present in the Armenian lands at different points in history. Naturally, the existence of such traces does not mean that the historical identities of the two countries are identical. Rather, it points to the shared historical layers that have developed between them over the centuries.

Elsewhere in this lush landscape, in the heart of Yerevan, stands a building that may be regarded as one of the most tangible symbols of the historical presence of Iranian culture in Armenia: the Blue Mosque. Commissioned by Hussein Ali Khan, the ruler of Yerevan at the time, the mosque was built in 1765–1766 and is considered a notable example of Iranian mosque architecture of its period. Architecturally similar to, and bearing the same name as, another mosque built in Tabriz around the same period, the Blue Mosque has stood for more than two and a half centuries. Today, it is the only active mosque in Armenia.

The building’s history during the Soviet era is also noteworthy. At a time when the Soviet Union’s strict secularist policies stripped many religious buildings of their original functions and led to the destruction of several historic mosques in Yerevan, the Blue Mosque escaped demolition. Historical accounts and official Armenian tourism sources refer to the role played by Yeghishe Charents, a prominent Armenian poet, and a number of the country’s intellectuals in preventing its destruction. Charents’ place in this account is particularly significant because his connections with Iran went beyond an interest in Persian culture and literature. His family had roots in the city of Maku, and his works later attracted attention in Iran and were translated into Persian. Although the mosque was converted into a history museum and subsequently put to other uses during that period, the original structure survived. Following Armenia’s independence, it was also restored with Iran’s participation and support, eventually resuming its religious function. The significance of this episode lies not simply in the survival of a historic building, but in the fact that intellectuals and cultural figures from one society made efforts to preserve a monument belonging to the religious and architectural tradition of another. Such an experience cannot be explained solely in political terms. It reflects an appreciation of historical and cultural heritage that transcends religious and identity-based boundaries.

This historical connection, however, is not limited to Iranian monuments in Armenia. Looking back toward Iran, we encounter the other side of the same story: the centuries-old presence of the Armenian community in Iran and its contribution to the country’s cultural and social development. The historic relocation of Armenians from Old Julfa to Isfahan under Shah Abbas I and the establishment of New Julfa in the early seventeenth century marked one of the most significant chapters in this history. Taking place against the backdrop of the Safavid–Ottoman wars and Shah Abbas’s population policies, this relocation eventually led to the emergence of one of the region’s most important Armenian commercial and cultural centers. Over time, Armenian merchants from New Julfa expanded their extensive trading networks as far as India and Europe, while also establishing churches, schools, cultural centers, and social institutions. Vank Cathedral in Isfahan, one of the most prominent legacies of this period, remains one of the most important religious and cultural centers of Iran’s Armenian community.

This presence was by no means confined to Isfahan’s New Julfa. Northwestern Iran is also home to some of the most important historical Armenian monuments, including St. Thaddeus Monastery, also known as Qara Kelisa, St. Stepanos Monastery, and the Chapel of Dzordzor. These sites were collectively inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List in 2008. What is particularly interesting about UNESCO’s description of these monuments is its emphasis on the interaction between Armenian architectural traditions and Iranian, Byzantine, and Orthodox cultures. In other words, even from the perspective of international heritage institutions, the history of Armenian architecture in Iran cannot be examined without taking into account its interaction with Iran’s broader cultural and civilizational environment.

Yet perhaps more significant than buildings and historical monuments is the experience of communities that have lived alongside one another for centuries. Iran’s Armenian community is not simply a religious minority with a long historical presence. At many points in the country’s history, it has been an influential part of Iran’s cultural, artistic, scientific, and social developments. A look at some of the individuals who have left a lasting mark on contemporary Iranian culture and history is enough to illustrate this point.

In cinema, Samuel Khachikian stands among the most important figures in the history of Iranian filmmaking. Through his innovations in crime and thriller films, he had a considerable impact on the visual language of Iranian cinema. Loris Tjeknavorian, meanwhile, is a renowned composer and conductor whose work has earned him recognition in Iran and around the world. In sports, Andranik Eskandarian and Andranik Teymourian are among the footballers who have represented Iran’s national team at different times. In science, Alenoush Terian, an Iranian-Armenian physicist and a pioneer of astronomy and solar physics in Iran, holds a special place.

These individuals are merely a few examples from a much longer list. More importantly, their contributions to Iranian culture and society cannot be separated from their Iranian identity. Khachikian’s films form part of the history of Iranian cinema, just as Terian’s scientific achievements are part of the history of science in Iran. In many fields, the Armenian community has been present not on the margins, but at the heart of Iran’s cultural and social developments. This is a form of coexistence in which religious and ethnic differences have not prevented the emergence of a shared social identity and experience.

This historical and social experience appears to have also influenced how the two peoples perceive one another. For many Armenians, Iran is a familiar neighbor with a long history of cultural and historical connections. Likewise, for a considerable number of Iranians, Armenia is more than a neighboring country north of the Aras River. It is associated with names, historical landmarks, neighborhoods, and personalities that have become part of Iran’s cultural memory. Of course, it would be inaccurate to make a single generalization about the views of all people in either country. Nevertheless, these historical and social foundations have created favorable conditions for mutual understanding and the development of trust between the two societies.

The potential of these ties to contribute to the future development of bilateral relations should not be overlooked. Cultural and social relations can become a genuine asset in bilateral affairs only when they move beyond the commemoration of shared history and translate into practical cooperation. Cultural tourism, joint efforts to restore and preserve historical monuments, academic exchanges, joint film and media productions, and the translation and promotion of each country’s literature are just some of the areas in which cooperation could be expanded on the basis of this historical legacy. Under such circumstances, mutual understanding between the two peoples can complement official relations between the two governments, giving them greater depth and durability.

Iran and Armenia do not need to start from scratch in getting to know one another. Parts of each country’s history can be found in the heritage and monuments preserved on the other’s soil. The Blue Mosque in Yerevan and the historic Armenian churches in Iran, the Persian inscriptions at Garni and the Armenian quarter of Isfahan are just a few examples of this reality. Perhaps the most valuable aspect of this relationship is that, despite religious, linguistic, and political differences, the possibility of interaction and coexistence between the two societies has endured over the centuries. If properly recognized and put to use, this historical asset can serve as one of the most important foundations for Iran–Armenia relations in the years ahead.

Photo by Mkhitar Khachatryan / Armenpress News Agency


—

European Court of Human Rights Rules in Favor of Kingdom Hall Construction in

Jehovah’s Witnesses JW.org
Nov 2, 2026

On October 1, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) unanimously ruled in favor of Jehovah’s Witnesses in a case concerning three Kingdom Hall building projects in Yerevan. In its decision, the ECHR found that authorities in Armenia had, without a legal basis, rejected the Witnesses’ applications to build Kingdom Halls and violated their right to freedom of worship.

In 2009, our brothers purchased three plots of land to construct Kingdom Halls in neighborhoods across Armenia’s capital city, Yerevan. Several years later, in December 2012, they applied to the mayor’s office for permission to begin construction on all three sites. Officials cited complaints raised by neighbors and rejected the applications. After several unsuccessful appeals before courts in Armenia, our brothers brought the case before the ECHR in January 2016.

In its judgment, the Court found that the authorities lacked a legal basis for refusing the applications and presented no proof of the alleged complaints. For these reasons, the ECHR ruled that officials had violated our brothers’ right to freedom of worship under the European Convention on Human Rights. As part of its ruling, the Court awarded the Witnesses compensation in the amount of 4,500 euros ($5,060 U.S.) as well as their legal fees.

After the ruling was announced, Brother Artur Ispiryan, who serves at the Armenia branch and assisted with legal matters pertaining to the case, said: “As the number of Witnesses in Armenia continues to grow, so does the need for more suitable places of worship. Currently, there are ten Kingdom Halls in Yerevan, but at least eight more are still needed. We are grateful for this positive decision by the Court, which will undoubtedly help us in obtaining permits for future Kingdom Hall construction.”

We rejoice along with our brothers and sisters in Armenia at this important legal victory. We pray that Jehovah will continue to bless his people worldwide as they build and freely use Kingdom Halls for spiritual education and encouragement.—Hebrews 10:24, 25.

—

‘Certain circles in Russia and Eurasian Economic Union back secret plan by Arm

JAM News
Nov 3, 2026
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Armenia has reached a very important historic turning point, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said during a discussion of the 2027 state budget. He described it as a moment that would have a decisive impact on the country’s political, economic and social development.

However, he said that forces both inside Armenia and abroad were seeking to prevent this historic moment from arriving. According to Pashinyan, similar forces had opposed Armenian statehood in the past, dating back to 2018. That was the year of Armenia’s “Velvet Revolution”, which brought him and his team to power. “But this year, their cards have been laid bare,” Pashinyan stressed.

He singled out the so-called “secret plan”, which opposition circles have been discussing recently.

“The aim of this plan is to prevent Armenia from continuing on its path of economic development. There are not enough resources inside Armenia to implement this secret plan, so its authors must do everything possible to secure resources from abroad,” he said.

The prime minister spoke about this “secret plan” a couple of weeks ago, but did not specify which countries he meant. This time, however, he openly named them:

“I do not want to hide the fact that certain circles within the Eurasian Economic Union, led by Russia, and in the Russian Federation itself support this plan. And there are reasons for this, because people have been sent to Armenia with specific promises and guarantees.”

Samvel Karapetyan, leader of the pro-Russian opposition Strong Armenia party, has repeatedly spoken about a “secret plan” to change the government in Armenia. He made these remarks in response to a question about the steps the opposition intended to take to oust the current authorities.

At his weekly briefing on 22 October, Nikol Pashinyan said that forces both inside Armenia and abroad were taking steps to effectively eliminate the country:

“The aim is to provoke political instability inside Armenia. As a result, they intend to take control of the Armenian state. In other words, they want to strip Armenia of its independence – first de facto, and then de jure.”

The prime minister also said that several similar attempts had taken place over the past three years. He cited, in particular, the events in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2023 and hybrid attacks on Armenia during the parliamentary elections, which took place in June this year. He believes a third attempt is now under way. In particular, he was referring to an expert forecast by the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council, which warned of an allegedly catastrophic economic downturn in Armenia if the country left the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU. “This is part of the ‘secret plan’ that people are actively discussing now,” Pashinyan said.


  • Russian-led EAEU bloc warns Armenia of possible ‘serious blows’ to its economy
  • Russia seeks to retain Armenian railway concession as Yerevan avoids confrontation
  • ‘Whether we should ‘marry’ the EU is question for future’, Armenia’s foreign minister says about EU membership

“Armenia’s political forces must understand that the people are their only guarantee”

The prime minister said that certain opposition figures had “received specific guarantees and been sent to Armenia”. He then asked: “So why are these guarantees not being honoured?” He went on to answer his own question, urging the opposition to look back at the history of the Armenian people. He said that whenever such “guarantors” had emerged, the outcome had invariably been another catastrophe.

“I am essentially doing our opposition colleagues a favour by pointing out that they still have time to avoid a similar catastrophe. I am talking about the political catastrophe facing opposition parties, which you all know about. I hope they will seize this opportunity to avoid it.”

He recalled that he had previously urged the opposition to stop relying on these “guarantors” and instead focus its efforts on strengthening Armenia’s independence and sovereignty. However, his proposal went unanswered.

“In effect, it was rejected through silence. I believe the window of opportunity has not yet closed. Ultimately, our political forces must understand that there is only one guarantee – the people of Armenia,” he stressed.

—

UK: Armenian bishop to take on Battersea half marathon

ICN – Independent Catholic News
Nov 2, 2026
  • John Newton

Armenian Bishop Hovakim Manukyan in training for the race

Source: Aid to the Church in Need

An Armenian Bishop is set to pound the streets of London in a sponsored run for Christians who suffer persecution around the world.

Bishop Hovakim Manukyan – Primate of the Armenian Apostolic Church in the United Kingdom and Ireland – is hoping to raise £5,000 when he takes part in the Battersea Park Half Marathon on 14th November.

Speaking to Catholic charity Aid to the Church in Need (ACN) – the charity he is raising funds for – Bishop Hovakim said his preparation for the 21 km (13.1 miles) course is off to a running start.

He said: “My training is already underway, and I have already completed a 15 km run from Kew Bridge to Hammersmith Bridge and back.”

Bishop Hovakim is an experienced runner. His first major race was in 2024 when he completed the Windsor 5K before going on to tackle the Kingston Half Marathon – both for charity.

Nor will this be his first race of 2026. On 20th September he took part in a 10K run supporting a camp for displaced children from Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) in the Caucuses.

Talking about his next race, he said: “Now I am preparing for the Battersea Park Half Marathon in support of Aid to the Church in Need’s #RedWednesday initiative” – which supports suffering Christians around the world.

He added: “As a bishop, I know that suffering is neither merely historical nor distant.

“Today many Christians suffer around the world… Yet we remain steadfast in prayer, truth and love, trusting that Christ strengthens His people.

Bishop Hovakim expressed his particular appreciation for ACN’s support for communities in Armenia through the Armenian Catholic Church – which has shared roots with his own Armenian Apostolic Church.

He said: “As an Armenian Apostolic bishop, I see this as a meaningful _expression_ of Christian solidarity across our traditions.”

Bishop Hovakim told ACN that he took up running “for health reasons”.

He said: “I was overweight and realised that I needed to make a change. I started by walking, then running short distances, gradually building up my strength and confidence. Clergy, too, need to look after their health.”

He added: “Running has become much more than exercise for me. It is a kind of therapy and, often, a time of prayer.

“I am alone with my thoughts, with God and with the rhythm of my footsteps. The noise and demands of everyday life fall away for a while, creating space to reflect and simply be present.”

Encouraging people to sponsor his run, he said: “Aid to the Church in Need does valuable work supporting vulnerable Christian communities and giving a voice to those who struggle to be heard.

“#RedWednesday reminds us that persecution is a present reality for many of our brothers and sisters. For me, this is deeply connected to our Christian calling. As St James teaches, faith without works is dead [James 2:26].

“From its earliest days, the Church has prayed, proclaimed the Gospel and offered practical help to those in need. Supporting this initiative is one way of putting that faith into action.”

To sponsor Bishop Hovakim visit: https://acnuk.donorsupport.co/p2p/pages/NPJVTATV


—

Metsamor Tomb Reveals Burials From the Bronze Age to Augustus, Excavators Say

Nov 1, 2026
Archaeologists working beside the Metsamor Historical-Archaeological Museum-Reserve in western Armenia have dug down through a single stone tomb and found burials stacked across very different ages. Earlier seasons exposed an upper layer holding gold jewelry and a coin of Octavian Augustus. This year, near the floor, the team reached what the excavators call the main burial, with horse bones, pottery and a bronze dagger of the Lchashen type.

According to Armenpress, the state news agency, the work is run by the Service for the Protection of Historical Environment and Cultural Museum-Reservations, a state non-commercial organization under Armenia’s Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sport. Armenpress reported the results on October 27, 2026. The service’s statement, as quoted in English by Armenpress, describes the site as a burial chamber that was “used over a long period and reused in different periods,” a reading that rests, for now, on a preliminary dating of the finds.

A Stone Chamber Inside a Cromlech

The tomb sits on a plot of land owned by private individuals, right next to the protected reserve. Excavation began there two years ago and continued this year. The service gave Armenpress a short description of the structure itself:

“The archaeological structure under investigation is a stone-built burial chamber surrounded by a cromlech approximately 20 meters in diameter. The structure is built of tuff and basalt stones.”

At the center stands a large stone-cist tomb of the same stone, which the service measured at about 6 by 4 meters on the inside. Panorama, another Armenian outlet, described the cromlech for English readers as a circular stone arrangement around the tomb.

The finds came out in stages over several seasons, since earlier digging exposed the top layer while the 2026 season went deeper and reached the oldest material. This order matters, because the headline objects, the gold earrings and the Augustus coin, were not the discovery of this year at all.

Gold and a Coin of Augustus at the Top

According to the service, earlier excavations “had uncovered a burial from the Classical period in the upper layer of the tomb, accompanied by a rich assemblage of grave goods.” Armenpress reports that these included gold jewelry, a coin and other objects of the Classical period, dating to the first century AD.

News.am, which also carried the service’s announcement, lists the eye-catching pieces as gold earrings, a button, a coin of Octavian Augustus and a bronze dagger. Augustus ruled the Roman Empire from 27 BC to AD 14, as the Armenian outlet 301.am notes, so a coin of his fits the first century date given for the upper burial.

A silver denarius of Octavian, later Augustus, dated by the Metropolitan Museum of Art to about 29 to 27 BC. It is shown for context only. It is not the coin found at Metsamor, which has not been described in detail. Metropolitan Museum of Art, via Wikimedia Commons, released under Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication (CC0).

What the reports do not say is just as important. None of them describe the coin in detail, give its metal, or say how it reached Metsamor. None of them identify the person in the upper burial either. A Roman coin in an Armenian grave is a tempting clue to trade or contact with Rome, but the published statements stop well short of that link.

The same restraint applies to the wording of the announcement itself, where News.am relays the service’s description of the finds as “unique and exclusive,” while Radar Armenia renders it as “unique and exceptional.” Both renderings trace to the service’s announcement, and no outside specialist has yet commented on them in the reports.

An Iron Age Burial in Between

The middle of the sequence is the least described. The service reports that the 2026 work exposed “a burial layer dating to the Iron Age, where the burial of a single individual was found, accompanied by grave goods and a large quantity of pottery.”

No date range more precise than the Iron Age is given, and the grave goods are not listed. It is not yet clear whether this person was buried in the same chamber while it was still visibly a tomb, or whether the builders of the later burials knew what lay beneath them.

Horse Bones and a Lchashen Dagger at the Floor

The deepest layer is where the excavators place the original burial. Armenpress quotes the service:

“The main burial was uncovered in the lower part of the burial chamber, near the floor. Based on the preliminary dating of the materials found, it dates to the Late Bronze Age”

The service places it in the 14th to 13th centuries BC.

That layer contained “substantial accumulations of horse bones,” large quantities of pottery fragments, belt fragments, bell-shaped pendants, fragments of various bronze objects and the dagger. The word preliminary deserves weight here. The service does not say whether the date comes from the style of the objects or from a laboratory method, and no radiocarbon results are mentioned.

The dagger’s type name points to a well-known site. Lchashen lies on the northwest shore of Lake Sevan, and its necropolis lay under the lake until the 1950s and was excavated after the water level was lowered, according to a 2017 study by L. A. Petrosyan in the journal Via in tempore. Petrosyan writes that the Late Bronze Age mounds there held large burial vaults with two-wheeled and four-wheeled wooden vehicles, including the Lchashen wagon.

The History Museum of Armenia holds a bronze dagger with a sheath from Lchashen, which its catalog dates to the 15th to 14th centuries BC. Its sheath bears “the embossed image of a serpent crawling upwards.” The Metsamor reports do not describe their dagger in this kind of detail, so it is not yet clear how closely it matches.

Horse remains in a Late Bronze Age grave are a striking detail, but the reports do not say how many animals are represented, whether they were whole, or how they were placed. Without that, the reports offer no basis for reading the horses as sacrifices or status symbols.

What Was Metsamor?

The Armenian-Polish Archaeological Mission, a joint project with the University of Warsaw, says the settlement began at the end of the fifth or start of the fourth millennium BC and was used, with breaks, until the 17th century AD. In its prime, between the 11th and 9th centuries BC, the mission says it covered nearly 100 hectares and “was a major metallurgical centre.”

Full-scale excavation began in 1965 under Emma Khanzadyan, according to the mission, and work since 2013 has been led jointly by Ashot Piliposyan and Krzysztof Jakubiak. Earlier excavations found kilns, channels for liquid metal and large containers cut into the bedrock, as Jakubiak and his University of Warsaw colleague Kinga Bigoraj summarized in a 2020 paper in the journal Antiquity.

How Metsamor Met Urartu

The later history of the Metsamor settlement is debated among the archaeologists who know it best. The mission’s own website says that early in the eighth century BC the Urartian king Argishti I “laid waste to the city,” after which it was partly rebuilt. Readers can follow the wider story of the Kingdom of Urartu and its expansion.

Jakubiak and Bigoraj, however, argued in Antiquity that the old idea of a forced takeover “cannot be sustained in light of the new evidence.” They found no traces of destruction from the turn of the ninth and eighth centuries and described the change as “a well-planned political and economic expansion.” Both accounts come from people tied to the same Armenian-Polish project, and the website does not say which view it now follows.

None of this bears directly on the new tomb, which lies outside the reserve and has not been tied by the service to any phase of the citadel. Armenia has produced other striking Bronze Age graves in recent years, such as a couple buried in an embrace, but each needs its own full report.

Until the service publishes its plans, dates and the coin itself, the Metsamor tomb remains less a finished story than a stack of promising chapters.

How we label claims

Established: a stone-cist tomb inside a cromlech about 20 meters across, beside the Metsamor reserve, with an upper burial holding gold jewelry and a coin of Augustus, an Iron Age burial of one individual, and a lowest burial with horse bones, pottery, bronze fragments, pendants and a Lchashen-type dagger, all as reported by the excavating service. Unverified: the 14th to 13th century BC date of the main burial, which the service calls preliminary, and the service’s description of the finds as unique. Disputed: whether Argishti I destroyed Metsamor or absorbed it peacefully.

The site of the ancient citadel of Metsamor in Armenia, photographed in 2007. The newly reported tomb lies on private land next to the museum-reserve and does not appear in this photo. Photo by alpolano, via Wikimedia Commons, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0).

By Aris Manus

Sources

  • Excavations in Armenia yield gold jewelry, coin of Octavian Augustus, Armenpress, October 27, 2026
  • Gold earrings, Roman coin and bronze dagger unearthed at Armenia’s Metsamor site, Panorama.am, October 27, 2026
  • Gold earrings, button, coin of Octavian Augustus, bronze dagger: Exclusive finds discovered at Armenia’s Metsamor archaeological site, News.am, October 27, 2026
  • Gold Earrings and Coin of Roman Emperor Augustus Discovered at Metsamor, Armenia, 301.am, October 27, 2026
  • Exceptional finds have been discovered in Metsamor, Radar Armenia, undated
  • Our History, Armenian-Polish Archaeological Mission Metsamor
  • Krzysztof Jakubiak and Kinga Bigoraj, Metsamor: the Early Iron Age/Urartian settlement in the Aras Valley, Armenia, Antiquity 94 (378), 2020
  • L. A. Petrosyan, Wheeled vehicles from the Late Bronze Age cemetery of Lchashen, Via in tempore, 2017 (in Russian, English abstract)
  • Dagger with a sheath, History Museum of Armenia
https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/metsamor-tomb-armenia-bronze-age-augustus-coin-00128339

—