Adoption of Armenian Genocide Bill in France Correct Step by Friend

PanARMENIAN.Net

Adoption of Armenian Genocide Bill in France – Correct
Step by Good Friend
13.10.2006 16:33 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The bill penalizing the denial of
the Armenian Genocide in France is of great importance
for Armenia, since our two states enjoy very warm
relations, RA NA ex-Speaker Artur Baghdassarian said.
`We always stand for the development of the
French-Armenian relations and think it’s a correct
step made by a good friend,’ he said. At that Artur
Baghdassarian added he is not surprised at Turkey’s
reaction. `We should not forget that besides France
many other states have condemned the Armenian
Genocide. If we do not condemn genocides we will have
to face this evil in future. We should recognize what
happened in the past in order to prevent its
repetition tomorrow,’ he said, reports Golos Rossii.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

"Days of Armenia in Siberia" finished in Krasnoyarsk

Siberian News Online, Russia
Oct 13 2006

"Days of Armenia in Siberia" finished in Krasnoyarsk 10/13/2006
6:36:45 PM

"Days of Armenia in Siberia" were closed in Krasnoyarsk in
International Exhibition Business Center "Siberia" officially on
October, 13. Yerevan Champagne Plant, Gent Group (facing ceramics),
Vedi Alko Ltd (vintage wine) and Lamag Ltd (decorative goods) were
awarded with medals of Krasexpocenter Ltd.

It is worth reminding that Armenian and Krasnoyarsk businessmen had
meetings as part of "Days of Armenia in Siberia", participated in a
panel discussion with members of Central Siberian Commerce and
Industrial Chamber, The Union of Industrialists and Businessmen of
Krasnoyarsk Territory and the Union of Commodity Manufacturers and
Consumers. Famous Armenian singers and musicians gave two concerts,
one in IEBS Siberia, the second one – in the Big Concert Hall of the
philharmonic society.

Visitors were also able to see an exhibition of Armenian food and
industrial goods. The expositions showed decorative goods, national
souvenirs made of stone and ceramics, shoes, textile, equipment, a
wide range of beverages, including alcohol.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Turkey Proud of Pamuk Who Recently Stood Trial for Statements on Gen

PanARMENIAN.Net

Turkey Proud of Pamuk Who Recently Stood Trial for Statements on Genocide
13.10.2006 17:05 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkish officials and writing elite
of Turkey said they are proud of Orhan Pamuk. `We
congratulate Orhan Pamuk with the Nobel Prize awarding
and wish him every success in his career. The Turkish
public has for a long time waited to see a Turkish
writer awarded with Nobel Prize,’ says the statement
of the Turkish Foreign Ministry, reports RFE/RL.

It should be noted that not long ago Pamuk had to
stand trial for insulting Turkishness. The accusation
was brought over his statement on the Armenian
Genocide. In an interview with a Swiss newspaper Pamuk
said that `a million of Armenians and 30 thousand
Kurds were slaughtered in the Ottoman Empire.’

Adoption of Armenian Genocide Bill Will Change Many Things for Franc

PanARMENIAN.Net

Adoption of Armenian Genocide Bill Will Change Many Things for France
13.10.2006 17:14 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "A wrong step taken on October 12th will change many
things for France and not for Turkey," said Turkish Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan when commenting on the French bill criminalizing
the denial of the Armenian Genocide.

"Initiative of France to turn a historical lie into a law is a big
challenge against EU`s fundamental values. The most valuable asset of
Copenhagen criteria is freedom of thought and expression. So when a
scientist says "this thing is against scientific and historical
realities" and this will be considered as a crime; then where is the
freedom of expression? Moreover, how can France be part of a problem
between Turkey and Armenia?" Erdogan asked. He said that international
politics cannot be made by avoiding scientific and historical
documents and remarked that France should look at what happened in
Algeria between November 1st, 1954 and March 19th, 1962, reports
Turkishpress.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Public Discussion of NKR Constitution Starting in Stepanakert

PanARMENIAN.Net

Public Discussion of NKR Constitution Starting in Stepanakert
13.10.2006 17:28 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Issues of organization of the public discussion of
the Nagorno Karabakh Republic’s draft Constitution were considered in
the course of working conference in the NKR National Assembly.
Chairman of the National Assembly Ashot Ghulian noted that on October
12 the draft Constitution was published in Azat Artsakh republican
newspaper with a circulation of several thousands of copies for public
discussion which is planned to realize till October 21. As a result of
an exchange of opinions the forms and means of delivery of the draft
document to all the settlements of the republic as well as the
mechanism of ensuring the process of getting possible remarks and
suggestions from citizens were defined, reported the NKR MFA press
office.

Kommersant Daily: France May Be Expelled from CoE for Armenian Bill

PanARMENIAN.Net

Kommersant Daily: France May Be Expelled from CoE for Armenian Genocide Bill
13.10.2006 17:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ If the bill penalizing the Armenian Genocide denial
is finally adopted France runs a risk to receive a suit from the
European Court of Human Rights, which can force Paris to cancel the
disputable law, reports Kommersant daily. Besides, if the Council of
Europe Committee of Ministers, which is empowered to consider the
verdicts drawn by Strasbourg, also rates France’s moves as illegal,
the state may be expelled from the CoE. Anyway, the date for the next
voting in the upper house of parliament has not been fixed yet and the
French senators have enough time to weigh `for’ and `against’.

ANKARA: Armenian Bill’s Passage Depends on Government

Zaman Online, Turkey
Oct 13 2006

Armenian Bill’s Passage Depends on Government
By Ali Ihsan Aydin, Paris
Friday, October 13, 2006
zaman.com

Although the French parliament has approved a bill making it a crime
to deny the mass killings of Armenians in Turkey during World War I,
the Senate will also have to ratify it before the bill becomes law.

But for it to become an item on the agenda of the Senate, the bill
must be approved by the government, which seems very unlikely as
President Jacques Chirac does not look favorably on the bill.

If the present government refuses to endorse the bill, Francois
Holland, secretary-general of the opposition Socialist Party, has
vowed to make the bill a law in 2007 if they are in power.

Meanwhile, Armenians are pressing for the bill to make it to the
Senate before the legislative period ends.

There are three ways a bill that has passed in the French parliament
can appear on the agenda of the Senate.

The first is if the government approves and sends it to the Senate.

The second is if the Presidential Board of the Senate calls for a
motion.

First Opportunity on Nov.8

The Socialist Party will make a request for the bill to be on the
agenda of the Nov.8 meeting of the board.

But since the party in power occupies the majority of the chairs in
the Senate Board, the government must also endorse the bill.

The third way to make a bill an agenda item is by demanding an
emergency debate.

This demand can only be made by the Commission of Legal Affairs,
which is at the receiving end of the bill.

Parallel to the majority arithmetic of the Senate, the government
party has the final say in commissions, making it a difficult task
for the bill to become an agenda item in the upcoming term.

Armenians Focus on Elections

Patrik Devedjian, an Armenian-origin deputy who spoke to Zaman, said
that it was difficult for the bill to become law during the present
legislative period and could be postponed until next year.

The French Assembly will finish its work early in February because of
the presidential and general elections to be held in the spring.

Alexis Govdjian, president of the Council of Armenian Associations,
noted that they would make attempts in the upcoming days to put the
bill on the agenda of the Senate before the elections.

Referring to the genocide law passed in 2001, he promised to exert as
much effort on this bill.

The bill needs to be endorsed by the Senate without any amendments.

If a motion for a change regarding the text is made, it will be sent
back to the parliament.

The president, the final authority, can send the bill to the
Constitutional Court or the parliament if necessary.

After the endorsement by the Senate, the president of the parliament,
along with 60 senators apart from the president, can submit the bill
to the Constitutional Court.

The politics of Turkey and the F1 world

GrandPrix, NY
Oct 13 2006

The politics of Turkey and the F1 world

Mehmet Ali Talat, the man who caused the ongoing F1 Podium Crisis in
Turkey, has told the Associated Press that the FIA’s fine was "very
unfair, really very unfair and not acceptable". Talat said that he
was watching the race and was asked if he could hand over the
winner’s trophy. He was introduced as "the President of the Turkish
Republic of Northern Cyprus", an entity which the United Nations says
is "legally invalid".

"It was just a very innocent act," Talat said.

Others do not agree.

A spokesman for the government of Cyprus called the gesture an
"unacceptable and provocative theatrical performance organised by
Ankara" and said that the Turks had "deceived the FIA and tried to
exploit for political purposes a purely sporting event, through
provocative manoeuvres and absurd propaganda methods."

The FIA reacted by saying that "political neutrality is fundamental
to the FIA’s role as the governing body of international motor sport.
No compromise or violation of this neutrality is acceptable" but then
the FIA World Council decided to fine the Turks $5m rather than take
stronger action.

Talat’s remarks are unlikely to have much effect on the FIA
International Court of Appeal which must now decide whether the fine
is fair or not. If the Turks are allowed to get away with such a
provocative gesture, it is entirely possible that other nations will
decide to use Grands Prix as propaganda tools. If the fine is
confirmed the race may end up being threatened and that will have an
economic impact on the Formula One group. That is not a long-term
problem as there are plenty of other races that could step in,
although the Turkish track is a real challenge and it will be a shame
if it is lost.

The question is of key importance to the FIA as it will give a clear
sign as to whether the federation will allow its premier championship
to be used as a propaganda tool or whether it stands by its founding
principles and demands political neutrality at races.

While the FIA needs to consider the implications of its decisions
very carefully, Turkey itself needs to decide whether or not it
really wants to have a Grand Prix. The idea of the race was to
attract more tourists to the country. In addition to the immediate
financial gain, there is no question that the event was also about
giving Turkey a better international image which would, perhaps,
soften attitudes in Europe about Turkey’s desire to be a member of
the European Union.

Turkey has been trying to join Europe since 1959 but actual
negotiations did not begin until the end of last year. Europeans in
favour of the idea argue that Turkey’s vibrant economy and its move
to modernise is a big opportunity for Europe, that Turkey has been a
strong ally in NATO and that turning it into a stable secular
democracy would be a good example for Middle Eastern countries.

Those opposed to the idea argue that a big Muslim country – located
largely in Asia – has no place in Europe. The Turks have not helped
matters with their attitude to Cyprus, not to mention questions over
religious and ethnic discrimination and human rights. Public opinion
in Europe is largely against the idea with less than 40% of EU
citizens in favour. In order for the Turks to become part of Europe
all member states must agree. Several countries have already made it
clear that they would have referendums. France – up to now one of
Turkey’s biggest supporters – yesterday approved a bill which makes
it a crime to deny that Armenians were the victims of genocide
between 1915-1918 when it is claimed 1.5m Armenians were killed. Even
pro-Turkish French President Jacques Chirac says that Turkey must
recognise the Armenian genocide as a pre-condition of EU membership.
There is also a report due from the European Commission which is
expected to highlight the fact that Turkey is not doing enough in
terms of reform. Faced with Europe’s attitude, Turkish nationalists
have adopted a harder line in recent times and against this backdrop
the events on the podium in Istanbul are significant.

Ironically, if nationalism increases and the idea of EU membership
fades, there is less reason to have a Grand Prix.

French Bill on Armenian Genocide Widely Commented in World Media

PanARMENIAN.Net

French Bill on Armenian Genocide Being Widely Commented in World Media
13.10.2006 18:06 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The adoption of the French bill on the Armenian
Genocide is being commented in various media throughout the globe. The
New York Times reports that Chirac’s government standing against the
bill expressed wish to continue dialogue with Turkey. `We are willing
to carry on our dialogue, strong cooperation and friendship with
Turkey,’ the newspaper quotes the French MFA Spokesman.

The complex relationship between Turkey and Europe played out Thursday
in two European capitals, as Turkey’s leading novelist was awarded the
2006 Nobel Prize in literature in Stockholm and French lawmakers here
passed a bill that would make it a crime to deny that Ottoman Turkey
committed genocide against Armenians during and after World War I,
reports the Washington Post.

The Guardian says, `Ataturk, one of whose adopted daughters was an
Armenian survivor of the forced death marches, should have – but never
could – bring himself to face the truth, possibly because of his shame
at what his brother army officers had ordered while he was in
Gallipoli fighting off the British,’ reports RFE/RL.

Nobel laureate Pamuk chronicles Ottoman past

Reuters, UK
Oct 13 2006

Nobel laureate Pamuk chronicles Ottoman past
Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:27 AM BST

By Gareth Jones

ANKARA (Reuters) – Orhan Pamuk, who on Thursday became the first Turk
to win the Nobel Prize for Literature, shot to fame with novels that
explore Turkey’s complex identity through its rich imperial past.

But his criticism of modern Turkey’s failure to confront darker
episodes of that past has also turned Pamuk more recently into a
symbol of free thought both for the literary world and for the
European Union, which Ankara wants to join.

The bespectacled, boyish-looking Pamuk, 54, went on trial last year
on charges of insulting Turkish national identity under a
controversial article of the country’s penal code strongly criticised
by the EU.

Pamuk had upset nationalists by telling a Swiss newspaper that a
million Armenians had died in Turkey during World War One and 30,000
Kurds had perished in recent decades.

Though the court dismissed the charges against Pamuk on a
technicality, other writers and journalists are still being
prosecuted under the article and could face a jail sentence of up to
three years.

In a curious twist of irony, the Swedish Academy declared Pamuk
winner of the 2006 literature prize on a day when, to Turkey’s fury,
the French lower house of parliament approved a bill making it a
crime to deny the Armenian genocide.

Ankara says there was no genocide but that large numbers of both
Christian Armenians and Muslim Turks died in a partisan conflict
raging at that time as the Ottoman Empire collapsed.

The Pamuk trial was a big embarrassment for Turkey’s pro-Western
government, which has introduced a flurry of human rights reforms and
last year finally began EU accession talks.

At the height of the nationalist hysteria over his comments, one
provincial official called for Pamuk’s books to be burnt.

SPEAKING TRUTH

"What I said is not an insult, it is the truth. But what if it is
wrong? Right or wrong, do people not have the right to express their
ideas peacefully," Pamuk asked during the trial.

His work has been translated into many languages and has earned him a
growing fan club in Europe, America and beyond.

In his novels, Pamuk chronicles the clash between past and present,
East and West, secularism and Islamism, often against the colourful
backdrop of his native Istanbul, a city which straddles Europe and
Asia.

In "The White Castle", he explores the complex relationship between a
17th century Ottoman Muslim master and his Italian Christian slave.

"Snow", his most political work to date, Pamuk tells the tale of a
poet-journalist who returns from exile in Germany and travels to the
eastern Turkish city of Kars to investigate the suicides of a number
of pious, young headscarved women.

It is critical of both Westerners and Islamists in Turkey.

His most recent work, "Istanbul: Memories of a City", intersperses
personal reminiscences of childhood and youth with reflections on the
city’s Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman past.

"Istanbul’s fate is my fate. I am attached to this city because it
has made me who I am," he says.

Pamuk was born into a wealthy, Westernised family in Istanbul in
1952. He speaks fluent English and spent several years as a Columbia
University scholar in the United States.

He has pioneered a style of writing that combines traditional
story-telling with experimental devices and a very modern
preoccupation with identity and fears of a "clash of civilisations".