Bollywood diplomacy

Indian Express, India
Dec 9 2004

Bollywood DIPLOMACY

Express Features Service

New Delhi, December 8: Like so many people in his part of the
world, the outgoing Armenian ambassador Armen Baibourtian too is a
Bollywood fan. And so, at a recent farewell party held in his honour
at The Grand hotel, he informed us that he is taking back many filmi
memories. “Aishwarya Rai and Shah Rukh Khan are my favourite stars,”
said the man who will be Deputy Foreign Minister in the Armenian
government. Baibourtian served a four-and-a-half-year term in India and
was happy to deliberate on the India-Armenia connection. “There are
Armenian communities in India, mostly in Chennai and Kolkata. And at
present there are around 650 Indian students in Yerevan State Medical
University in Armenia,” he said. But if he had to choose between a doc,
Ash and SRK as Indian envoy to his country, wonder who he’d vote for?

Arkady Ghoukassian Awards Armenian Photographer From Canada Hrair(Ba

ARKADY GHOUKASSIAN AWARDS ARMENIAN PHOTOGRAPHER FROM CANADA HRAIR (BAZE)
KHACHERIAN WITH NKR MEDAL “YERAKHTAGITUTYUN”

STEPANAKERT, December 8 (Noyan Tapan). On December 8, NKR President
Arkady Ghoukassian awarded well-known Canadian photographer of Armenian
origin Hrair (Baze) Khacherian with the NKR medal “Yerakhtagitutyun”
(“Gratitude”). He was awarded with this medal for contribution to
the development of the NKR culture and in connection with the 15th
anniversary of the national-liberation movement in Artsakh.

Hrair Khacherian expressed deep gratitude to the head of the Karabakh
state for such a high assessment of his work. According to him,
Artsakh is a source of creative inspiration not only for himself but
for all the culural and art workers of the Armenian Diaspora.

According to the Head Information System attached to the NKR President,
on his behalf the Canadian photographer presented Arkady Ghoukassian
with one of his works.

Jakarta: `Ararat’ confronts truth in world of denial

‘Ararat’ confronts truth in world of denial
By Paul F. Agusta, Contributor/Jakarta, [email protected]

Jakarta Post, Indonesia
Dec 8 2004

Canadian author and journalist, Peter C. Newman, once wrote, “History
is no more than memories refreshed.”

Now, Armenian-Canadian writer-director Atom Egoyan sets out to refresh
mankind’s collective awareness concerning a long-buried event of
history; the Armenian genocide of 1915.

Although occurring almost a century ago, this event in which 1.5
million Armenians were killed or deported in a massive act of ethnic
cleansing within the Ottoman Empire, continues to haunt the both
the Armenians and the Turks, who have yet to fully acknowledge the
possibility it even happened at all.

With the deftly layered and heavily textured film, Atom Egoyan
points out that we cannot escape our histories, neither personal,
national or collective, nor can we escape the desire to understand
what happened and maybe, along the way, discover a hidden reality —
what makes us who we are.

It is this desire to comprehend that drives the majority of the
film’s characters, especially the young Armenian-Canadian Raffi;
the main protagonist.

In a film-within-a-film, in stories within a story, and in the midst
of grasping at a thin red thread of truth within a tapestry of lies
and denials, Raffi, played with subtle sadness and burning passion
by David Alpay, finds himself questioning his heritage while working
as a production assistant and driver on the set of a film about the
Armenian genocide.

As his questions are answered, even more questions emerge to plunge
him ever more deeply into an obsession with history; the catalogue
of the forgotten. As viewers watch Raffi turn the pages of the past,
the film, Ararat, takes on new and more complex layers that may daunt
many in the audience.

Egoyan throws such an immense amount of information at the audience
that it threatens to inundate the senses and to almost obscure the
core storyline of the genocide itself.

Yet, Egoyan never loses sight of the impact of that event, and
carefully ties up every lose end for the audience as the myriad threads
of the story entwine. It is his meticulous attention to detail as a
screenplay writer that lends immediacy to this film and motivates a
desire to learn more about this often-overlooked part of history.

It is as if Egoyan has set out to take the advice of Lord Acton who
once suggested that if the past seems to be an obstacle and a burden,
knowledge of it would be the safest and surest emancipation.

Ararat, which is rounded out by a stellar international cast,
including Christopher Plummer, Charles Aznavour, Eric Bogosian,
Arsinee Khanjian, Elias Koteas and Bruce Greenwood, is a solid piece
of work. Not one person among the players gives a performance that
falls short of excellence.

Charles Aznavour, who plays Edward Saroyan, the director of the
film-within-the-film, skillfully and aptly depicts a wounded soul,
who is a descendent of survivors.

Christopher Plummer plays David, a stern and almost reluctantly
compassionate professional, whose decisions are pivotal not only
for Raffi, but also for the cinematic revelation of the history of
the genocide.

As if driven by the suspicion that history is destined to repeat
itself because not enough people were consciously observing the
first time around, Egoyan has taken pains to make sure this film
is so unforgettable that it inscribes the tragedy of this atrocity
indelibly on the psyches of filmgoers.

Ararat is a film that many viewers may find requires a second viewing
due to the necessary complexity of the storytelling. It is truly
worth the effort.

ANKARA: Armenian Patriarch blames Turkey for poor relations

Armenian Patriarch blames Turkey for poor relations

NTV MSNBC, Turkey
Dec 8 2004

The Armenian Patriarch Karekin II said that the genocide issue was
not one that could be debated.

December 8— The Patriarch of the Armenian Church on Wednesday claimed
that Ankara was responsible for lack of formal diplomatic relations
with Yerevan.

Patriarch Karekin II said that this was because Turkey insisted on
setting preliminary conditions for the normalising of the relations.

However, Karekin II said that it was essential to resolve the question
of Ngorno-Karabag region of Azerbaijan and which is currently occupied
by Armenia, and the recognition of the alleged Armenian genocide.

“Undoubtedly in such a climate it is of special importance to open
the border and improve co-operation,” he said.

But he stressed that the issue of genocide was not an issue that
could be the subject of debate.

“This was a real experience, the Patriarch said. “But without any
hesitation I have to say that this problem has to be overcome and
relations between the two nations should be re-established.”

–Boundary_(ID_87ArFnMHUviOAw61XMJskQ)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Russia and the West

Turkish Press
Dec 8 2004

Russia and the West
BYEGM: 12/8/2004
BY SAMI KOHEN

MILLIYET- Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Ankara this
week coincided with a problematic period in terms of our relations
with the West. Before and after the visit, Turkey’s warmth for Russia
stood in contrast with its coldness towards the US and certain EU
members. In fact, Putin’s visit highlighted the positive atmosphere
between Ankara and Moscow. For example, the Turkish media’s interest
and positive take on relations with Moscow surprised even Russian
observers. However, there’s been a negative shift in Turkey’s feelings
for old friends. Particularly its anti-US feelings are about to upset
relations. The key factor in this is criticisms of US policies in
northern Iraq and towards PKK terrorists. As a decision on our EU
membership talks looms, there’s also difficulties and discomfort in
our relations with Europe. Particularly certain EU members’ recent
stances and a draft statement for the summit caused disappointment.

Putin’s visit to Ankara in such an atmosphere, taken as the
beginning of a new era for Turkish-Russian relations, served to
relax Turkey. However, we shouldn’t consider this an alternative
to our relations and common interests with the West or an escape
from the West by leaning towards Moscow. If Russia is seen in terms
of multidimensional relations, relations are positive. Ankara and
Moscow still have common views on many issues, for example, Iraq
and the Middle East. However, they disagree on others, for example,
Cyprus, Armenia and Northern Karabakh. We have good cooperation in
some areas, particularly economics. However, there is disharmony over
Straits traffic and energy transportation. Putin said in Ankara that
if Turkey becomes an EU member, due to EU restrictions, it wouldn’t
be able to buy inexpensive energy from Russia, as it has done, and
that many Russian tourists would no longer be able to visit Turkey.
In fact, these negative predictions for the next 10-15 years were
surprising. Putin gave the impression that he didn’t favor Turkey’s
EU membership and that Ankara should prioritize its relations with
Moscow. I wonder if he was trying to send a message even as Turkey
is working to get a date for EU membership talks.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: No appointment for Edelman

Turkish Press
Dec 8 2004

No appointment for Edelman
BYEGM: 12/8/2004
BY ASLI AYDINTASBAS

SABAH- There’s been a serious change in Turkish-US relations and the
atmosphere in Washington. Let’s look at what Turkey might want in
altering its 50-year ‘strategic partnership’ with the US. We can
begin our analysis with the fact that for three months now, US
Ambassador to Ankara Eric Edelman’s request for an appointment with
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has gone unanswered. This is
completely unprecedented. Egeman Bagis, a foreign policy advisor to
Erdogan, is in Washington, and another advisor, Cuneyt Zapsu, is also
on the way there. State Minister Mehmet Ali Sahin just got back from
a Stateside visit.

Yesterday I talked to both Turkish and US officials about the
strained state of relations. One high-ranking US official began by
joking, ‘We’re happy to have united the right and left wings.’
Anti-US feeling has become a common feeling among rightists,
leftists, Islamist and nationalists. Over the weekend, some
newspapers criticized Edelman for calling Fener Greek Patriarch
Bartholomeos ‘ecumenical.’ The US official continued: ‘Turkey is
rapidly losing its friends in Washington. I don’t know whether
they’re doing this on purpose or because they can’t manage crises.’
On its road to the EU, Ankara, on the other hand, is continuing its
relations with the US as a ‘cold marriage,’ and wants Washington to
keep off this road. US Secretary of State Colin Powell will ask his
Turkish counterpart whether Ankara needs Washington’s help for next
week’s pivotal EU summit. What the Americans have in mind is the
telephone diplomacy made before the 1999 Helsinki summit. But Ankara
is leaning towards saying, ‘no, thanks.’ The same US official said
that Turkish-US relations aren’t distant from Europe, and added ‘The
government struck a balance between us and the EU, but now if it’s
looking just to please France, that’s something else. However
Turkey’s natural place in Europe is among countries resisting the
Franco-German axis. Those countries have close relations with the
Washington.’ State Minister Sahin also had important meetings in the
EU. ‘Neither we nor the US has the right to destroy such a
longstanding relationship,’ he said.

The same US official said, ‘The Turks think we don’t have domestic
political problems, but there are three communities in Washington
interested in relations with Turkey. Relations with the Jewish lobby
are not good, and the US Greek community is disappointed about the
‘ecumenical’ crisis. The last group is the Armenian lobby, which has
its own line. The current atmosphere is a real nightmare for us’.

BAKU: OSCE mission to visit Azerbaijan’s occupied lands

OSCE mission to visit Azerbaijan’s occupied lands

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Dec 8 2004

The OSCE mission is expected to visit the occupied lands of Azerbaijan
with a view to scrutinizing illegal settlement of Armenians. The
issue was discussed in a meeting of Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign
ministers Elmar Mammadyarov and Vardan Oskanian with participation
of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs, which was recently held within the
forum of the OSCE member states’ foreign ministers in Sofia, Bulgaria.

The parties exchanged views on the status and prospects of settlement
of the Upper Garabagh conflict and agreed to continue talks in the
format of Prague meetings.

The Sofia meeting comes as the fifth one on settlement of the Upper
Garabagh conflict held between the Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign
ministers.*

BAKU: PACE to hear report on deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armeni

PACE to hear report on deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Dec 8 2004

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) Committee on
refugees, internally displaced persons and population heard a report
on deportation of more than 100,000 Azerbaijanis from Armenia from
1947 to 1953 in its meeting held in Paris on Monday on a request of
the Azerbaijani side.

According to Bakhtiyar Aliyev, the member of the Azerbaijani
delegation at PACE, the report, which provides evidence on genocide
and deportation of the Azerbaijani people perpetrated by Armenians
for centuries, has been included in a draft resolution.*

BAKU: Slovakia refuses to recognize ‘Armenian genocide’

Slovakia refuses to recognize ‘Armenian genocide’

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Dec 8 2004

The Slovakian government has refused to approve the issue of ‘Armenian
genocide’, which was put on parliamentary discussions by this country’s
opposition, Turkish Foreign Minister Abdulla Gul has told local media.

Gul said Turkey will take all necessary steps to prevent adoption of
a decision on the issue.

Armenian news agencies reported last week that the Slovakian
parliament in its November 30 meeting passed a decision to recognize
the ‘Armenian genocide’.

The issue was approved by 69 votes and with one parliament member
abstaining, according to the reports.

The Armenian society in Slovakia stated that the country’s parliament
Speaker Pavol Hrusovsky is preparing a report on rejecting Turkey’s
admission to the European Union (EU).

In his report the Slovakian Speaker will urge all EU legislative
bodies to put pressure on Turkey to recognize the ‘Armenian genocide’.*

ANKARA: Neighbors Need Each Other’s Ashes

Neighbors Need Each Other’s Ashes
By ALI H. ASLAN

Zaman, Turkey
Dec 8 2004

Last week, when U.S. -Turkish relations were tense because of the
controversial operation in Fallujah, Turkish Ambassador to Washington
Faruk Logoglu was a guest at a live broadcast on C-Span, one of
the most respected news channels in the United States. During the
program called the “Washington Journal,” where listeners are able to
ask questions on the phone, two people brought Iraq and Fallujah to
the agenda.

While Bush administration were being criticized by the Turkish public
because of Fallujah, these American citizens put the blame on Turkey
for what is happening there. “If Turkey had allowed the U.S. 4th
Infantry Division to enter Iraq through its territory, Fallujah would
not have been the central base for insurgency and terror.”

This was not the first time I heard this argument. It is particularly
widespread in military circles. As a matter of fact, one of those who
called Ambassador Logoglu, was a former member of the 4th Infantry
Division. Logoglu tried to show his American collocutors the full part
of the glass in relations between the two countries, particularly on
Iraq. Just as his American counterparts in Turkey do…

Public diplomacy, which is aimed at explaining official policies to
peoples and creating a positive image about one’s country, is one
of the indispensable elements of international relations. However,
despite efforts by both parties since the Iraq war process, serious
difficulties among others have been experienced in the public diplomacy
aspect of U. S. -Turkish relations. The big difference of opinion on
Fallujah, constitute a dramatic example to that.

In the US public opinion, Fallujah operation is mostly portrayed as a
means of fighting against terror and securing the upcoming elections.
As for Turkey, the matter is often viewed from the angle of human
rights and civilian casualties. The differences of opinion stem mostly
from the manner which the governments and the media reflect the issues
to their publics. “Strategic partners” normally confer with their
public policies as well. The lack of a strategic partnership between
the United States and Turkey, at least on Iraq, is obvious since
reactions against Fallujah have turned into such a diplomatic crisis.

It all started when Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan brought
Fallujah to the agenda, during his phone call to U. S. Vice
President Dick Cheney, to convey his congratulations over the
elections. The stunned White House was further saddened because the
phone conversation was leaked to the Turkish public. The chairman
of the Turkish Parliamentary Human Rights Investigation Commission,
Mehmet Elkatmis of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), likening
what is being done in Fallujah to “genocide,” tested the limits
of patience. Our guys had the “You cannot prevent people from
talking” approach. Americans, on the other hand, viewed the incident
as follows: Parliament is under the control of the ruling party; if
the government wishes, it could shape the discourse. Foreign Minister
Abdullah Gul, perhaps unaware of the scope of the problem, concurred
with Elkatmis’ remarks on his return from an overseas trip. However,
he later put reservations on the expression “genocide.” This was the
right attitude. Don’t we expect the same attitude from the U. S.
administration when the so-called Armenian genocide is brought to
the agenda in the U. S. Congress?

Today, the U. S. has the same nationalist reflexes on Iraq similar
to our sensitivities on Armenian and Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK)
issues. Even those who are aware of their mistakes do not like them to
be pointed out to them by putting a finger in the eye. The politicians
of both countries, in particular, should make their rightful and
democratic criticisms in a manner that would not pave the way for an
international crisis and fuel hatred. Otherwise, mutual indignations
could increase, open deep wounds in public conscience and even the
most successful public diplomacy may not be able heal them.

Besides, excessive emotional outbursts do not serve the purpose
of helping Iraq. They weaken the hands of those, already limited
in number, who defend our views in Washington. They also shake the
Americans’ trust in us more, reduce the chance that they would listen
our advice and thus correct their mistakes.

The significance Turkey gives to regional neighborhood and the empathy
it feels for the sufferings of the Iraqi people deserve appreciation;
however, whether we like it or not, we need good relations with the
United States, our possible neighbor in the foreseeable future. As
expressed in a Turkish saying, “A neighbor needs even the ashes of
a neighbor…”

–Boundary_(ID_4VabWICHUdCa+9fLiR0rQw)–