NKR Constitutional Commission Sitting

NKR CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSION SITTING

Azat Artsakh, Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
20 March 2006

On March 16 NKR President Arkady Ghukassian chaired the recurrent
sitting of the NKR Constitutional Commission, during which the first
two chapters of the bill of the NKR Constitution were discussed. After
the address of Armen Zalinian, the head of the working group,
a debate took place among the political forces represented in
the commission, representatives of both the government and the
opposition. Arkady Ghukassian instructed the group of experts to
study the observations and proposals put forward during the debate
and draw up conclusions. Summing up the results of the sitting, the
president emphasized the importance of compliance of the constitution
with the international standards. He mentioned that the final draft of
the constitution will be presented not only to the political forces
and public of NKR, but also authoritative experts of the world and
the Armenian Diaspora. The president instructed the working group to
work out the schedule of activity of the Constitutional Commission.

NKR: Situation Is Under Control

SITUATION IS UNDER CONTROL

Azat Artsakh, Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
20 March 2006

On March 15 the NKR Ministry of Agriculture and Health sent specialists
to the border villages of Mataghis and Talish in Martakert for
extension on protection from the bird flu. The reason was the
information in the Azerbaijani mass media that bird flu was reported
in the region of Tartar (Mirbashir).

Tartar is close to the northern border of Nagorno Karabakh Republic,
which urges to enhance control in our poultry farms. The specialists
of the ministry found out that in the past few months no mass deaths
of birds were reported. “It means the situation is stable, and there
are no cases that cause suspicion,” said Tigran Arustamyan, the head
of the department of veterinary medicine and cattle breeding of the
Ministry of Agriculture. Ofelia Harutyunian, the head of the hygiene
and epidemic department, said the measures that have been taken reduce
the risk of the penetration of the virus.

Nkr: Who Will “Determine” Nagorno Karabakh De Jure?

WHO WILL “DETERMINE” NAGORNO KARABAKH DE JURE?
Alexander Grigorian

Azat Artsakh, Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
20 March 2006

It took the Azerbaijanis and us many years to realize the declarative
nature of the two basic principles – the right for self-determination
and territorial integrity – set down in the UN and OSCE documents. More
exactly, our neighbours and we realized that the real correlation of
these two tenets of the international law depend on the political
reality, determined by the upholding of one of these tenets by the
international community or juggling of these two principles to solve
geopolitical problems. However, better late than never.

With regard to this the words of Movladi Udugov, the chief ideologist
of Maskhadov Ichkeria, which does not exist any more, come to my mind,
which he pronounced in his interview with the Yerevan-based news
agency. Movladi Udugov gave, in my opinion, an absolutely definite
and correct answer to the question what his vision of the solution
of the eternal dilemma between the right for self-determination
and territorial integrity was. “Famous dilemmas are the result
of a question that was originally put falsely,” said number one
ideologist of Ichkeria. “We (Ichkerian leaders – A.G.) are little
interested in a so-called international recognition. This recognition
would not guarantee peace. The international politics acts with a
consideration of real forces and interests.” And what do we have with
regard to the conflict over Nagorno Karabakh, if the OSCE, under the
auspices of which the peace settlement is carried on, recognized all
the parties of the conflict to have reason? In this connection the
announcement of the former OSCE Chairman-in-Office Flavio Kotti on the
principles of settlement at the OSCE summit in Lisbon is notable. As
the second principle of settlement he mentioned the legal status
of Nagorno Karabakh on the basis of self-determination, which would
give the highest degree of self-governance to Nagorno Karabakh within
Azerbaijan. In other words, on the one hand, the right of the Armenians
of Karabakh was recognized, but on the other hand, to a degree that
would be determined by Azerbaijan. Stepanakert and Yerevan rejected
the principles of the summit in Lisbon. Baku (which was at the same
time the author of these principles) accepted them, because under
these principles Azerbaijan would maintain its territorial integrity,
and would, in addition, determine the degree of “self-determination”
of the Armenians of Karabakh. Then the concept of the “common state”
emerged as a way of settlement based on compromise. However, this
proposal was rejected by Baku, because this concept would take away
from Azerbaijan the right to “determine” the Armenian population
of Nagorno Karabakh, although Azerbaijan would still maintain its
territorial integrity. And the international community, namely the
OSCE Minsk Group (more exactly the three co-chairmen), is seeking for
combining these two principles, offering a “draw” to the conflict
parties. For its part, this means that in this stage of historical
development of the region the international community (i.e. the West
plus Russia) is interested in having the Armenian population live in
Nagorno Karabakh, as well as in preventing the secession of ethnic
formations in Azerbaijan, which would destabilize the situation in the
region. And in case of defending one of the two basic principles of
the international law by the West and Russia they would not achieve
this aim. For instance, if the issue were resolved on the basis of
the right of the people of Nagorno Karabakh for self-determination,
Azerbaijan would either be divided into two independent states or
would have to cede part of its territory to Armenia. And if the
resolution were based on the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan,
no Armenians would stay to live in Nagorno Karabakh. Thus, the
application of the formula “self-determination minus territorial
integrity” to the settlement of the ethnic conflicts in the South
Caucasus would divide the country into independent ethnic states, and
the formula ” inviolability of frontiers minus self-determination”
would result in ethnic clearing. However, I think, the application
of the formula “self-determination plus territorial integrity”
in resolving ethnic political and ethnic territorial conflicts
is not free of risk either. The point is that the attempts at
combining these two principles might cause a “short circuit”. And
the consequences of this short circuit might be much more tragic
than the dissolution of the state or ethnic clearing. For instance,
if there were not for the Belovezh agreements which prepared the legal
basis for the division of the former USSR into 15 independent states,
and the leadership headed by Gorbachov sought for the resolution of
ethnic conflicts by way of combining these two principles, an ethnic
explosion would happen on the one sixth of the Earth, which could
cause a nuclear threat. Therefore, the fear of such a “circuit”
compels one of the conflict parties to yield. This was the case in
the former Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia, which “divorced on good
faith.” The situation was right the opposite in former Yugoslavia. As
a result even the Serbian state may soon lose Kosovo, as well as
Montenegro, which may become independent states. This is the reality
that needs to be taken into account by both the conflict parties and
the mediators. This, however, does not mean that any of the conflict
parties (Nagorno Karabakh, or Azerbaijan, for instance) should make
a unilateral compromise. The art of politics is to tune external
interests to its own interests. For this aim Azerbaijan applied the
factor of oil, which brought it significant political dividends at
the OSCE summit in Lisbon. And the overestimation of this factor by
the Baku authorities is the misunderstanding that Azerbaijan keeps
the international community under its thumb and not vice versa, which
did not allow them to achieve a settlement of the Karabakh conflict,
favourable for them. By the way, the former leadership of Armenia
also believed the “almightiness” of the factor of oil, and fearing
international isolation of the republic, accepted the principles of
resolution of the Karabakh conflict, that favoured Azerbaijan. However,
the Western community and Russia appear to be interested in having
Armenian population living in Nagorno Karabakh. Considering this,
we have to carry on persuading the international mediators, as well
as the entire civilized world, that with a vertical relationship
between Baku and Azerbaijan no Armenians would continue to live in
Nagorno Karabakh. The impression is that the international mediators
can now better imagine the consequences of returning Nagorno Karabakh
to the constitutional hug of Azerbaijan. It is not accidental that
the concept of a common state proposed by them earlier, as well as
the plan to hold a referendum on the status of Nagorno Karabakh in
the present territory of Nagorno Karabakh are efforts to give the
people of NKR an opportunity of de jure self-determination. This is the
reason of the negative reaction of official Baku, which was once again
confirmed during the negotiations between the presidents of Armenia
and Azerbaijan in Rambouillet, France. In 1997 the chairman of the
Committee of External Relations of the National Assembly of Armenia
Hovanes Igitian told the reporter of the Respublika Armenia Newspaper:
“I would point out some methodological shortcomings. Unfortunately,
I think, the dispute on the existence of NKR, its population, the
problems of development of Nagorno Karabakh has been shifted to a
theoretical plane: territorial integrity or self-determination. On
the one hand, this complicates the issue, on the other hand, makes
it primitive. The issue is much more complicated…” The security
of the Armenian population of Nagorno Karabakh should underlie the
settlement. This security, however, is impossible if Nagorno Karabakh
is joined to Azerbaijan.

And if the West and Russia are interested in having the Armenian
population of Karabakh live in Karabakh, they are simply obliged
to prevent a return to a vertical relationship between Baku and
Stepanakert. However, another question might occur. How long will
the West and Russia be interested in having the Armenian population
in Nagorno Karabakh? The answer of this question greatly depends on
NKR and certainly Armenia. The two Armenian states should interest the
international community by their actions and manner of existence. This
can be achieved in two ways. First, Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh need
to adopt the values and lifestyle of Western democracies. Second,
they should seek to benefit the realization of interests of the
world and regional leaders in their external policies. The latter is
more important than the former, because the world is not interested
in Armenia both in terms of its energy resources and geographical
position. Consequently, Armenia needs to manipulate the interests of
other states that influence the security and prospects of development
of Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh in one way or another. Non-standard
steps should be taken, which might not correspond to our former ideas
of friends and foes. In politics there are no friends and foes forever,
only interests are constant. If our main purpose is to prevent the
return of Nagorno Karabakh to the constitutional field of Azerbaijan,
providing the security of Armenia and NKR, the foreign policies of
the two Armenian states should be defined accordingly. Emotions
and counterarguments emanating from the Armenian mentalities, as
well as militaristic threats would not only be impertinent but also
prejudicial. The point is that realities may change as life goes
on. For instance, in the present stage of settlement of the Karabakh
conflict the official stance of the Baku authorities is directed at
changing the existing reality, which is, on the whole, beneficial
for the Armenian parties. It is a challenge that we should cope with
duly, using all our potential. A pragmatic foreign policy and full
correspondence with the standards of Western democratic societies
with an increasing military potential might be a way. No alternatives
to this can be seen. We may reach international recognition of NKR by
becoming part of the interests of the world and regional powers through
our pragmatic actions. Consequently, with a de facto self-determination
we should seek for a de jure self-determination all by ourselves. In
other words, everything depends on us, and not Moscow, Washington,
Paris or Ankara, which do not have constant friends and constant foes,
as it is accepted in big politics.

Cooperation Between Armenian Church And Local Authorities Develops

COOPERATION BETWEEN ARMENIAN CHURCH AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES DEVELOPS

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Mar 20 2006

ETCHMIADZIN, MARCH 20, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. On the evening of
March 18, His Holiness Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of
All Armenians, hosted a gathering of political and religious leaders
from throughout Armenia in the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin,
led by the Minister of Territorial Administration, Mr. Hovik
Abrahamian. Present for the meeting were all diocesan primates from
the Republics of Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh; regional governors
(Marzpets) of the Republic of Armenia; and mayors of cities from
throughout the country. According to the information system of the
Mother See, also present were the lay members of the Supreme Spiritual
Council. Reflecting on the administrative matters facing the Church,
the Pontiff underlined the great importance of reestablishing parish
life within the cities and villages of Armenia as a vital precondition
of fully achieving the Church’s mission in the fields of spiritual
education and pastoral ministry. “The restoration of parish councils,
parochial boards and parish life will greatly benefit our work in
strengthening the Armenian family by providing a strong foundation
built on Christian faith, Church teachings and Holy Tradition,
and reinforcing our independent statehood through education and
leadership”, stated the Catholicos of All Armenians. Minister of
Territorial Administration Hovik Abrahamian expressed his happiness
for the spirit of cooperation which is developing between the Armenian
Church and the local authorities. The Minister also placed importance
on these meetings occurring at regular intervals, in order to plan the
work ahead for the present and future collaboration between Church and
state, which he stated would benefit the prosperity of the homeland and
the life of the people. During the meeting, many proposals were offered
by the participants regarding spheres of cooperation. Also discussed
was concern among many regional and local officials regarding the
destructive activities of cults and various sects operating in Armenia.

It Is Envisaged To Establish Armenian-Indian Center Of InformstionTe

IT IS ENVISAGED TO ESTABLISH ARMENIAN-INDIAN CENTER OF INFORMSTION TECHNOLOGIES IN ARMENIA

Noyan Tapan
Mar 20 2006

YEREVAN, MARCH 20, NOYAN TAPAN. A preliminary agreement on providing
considerable assistance to the development of the information
technologies (IT) sector in Armenia has been reached between the
Armenian and Indian governments. RA Deputy Minister of Trade and
Economic Development Tigran Davtian stated this on March 20. According
to him, the assistance will cover the IT educational and technical
assistance. The issue of opening an Armenian-Indian IT center in
Armenia is now under discussion, and a preliminary agreement with
respect to it has been achieved as well. T. Davtian said that the
Armenian-Indian cooperation in the IT sector has become a realilty,
as a commission to deal with problems of this cooperation has been
set up. Besides, the Armenian company Aviainfotel has opened its
office in India.

In Opinion Of Indian Businessmen,Making An Indian Film In Armenia To

IN OPINION OF INDIAN BUSINESSMEN, MAKING AN INDIAN FILM IN ARMENIA TO GIVE IMPETUS TO TOURISM DEVELOPMENT

Noyan Tapan
Mar 20 2006

YEREVAN, MARCH 20, NOYAN TAPAN. The Armenian-Indian relations have
entereed a new stage. RA Deputy Foreign Minister Armen Bayburtian
expressed this opinion at a press conference with the participation of
representatives of the Indian business delegation at the RA Ministry
of Foreign Affairs on March 20. The delegation came to Armenia on the
initiative of Harshad Mehta, Honorary Consul of Armenia in Mumbai,
who is also a big investor in Armenia where he has two diamond cutting
enterprises. Among the Indian businessmen are representatives of
Bollywood – an Indian film production company. According to Honorary
Consul H. Mehta, they intend to make films in Armenia and about
Armenia. He said about 1,000 films are made in Bollywood each year,
which are watched by 1.5 bln people all over the world, and an Indian
film made in Armenia will promote the development of the country’s
tourism. “Wherever Bollywood goes, it is followed by tourists,” the
company director Mukesh Bhatt assured. He said that he was a producer
of 45 films, 27 of which were made in various countries, in which an
increase in the number of tourits started after that. He expressed a
hope that he will become the first Indian film producers to make films
in Armenia. Mukesh Bhatt indicated the absence of direct Yerevan-Delhi
flights as the only difficulty, adding that he was promised that such
flights will be operated soon, while the Armenian partners promised
to provide all the equipment necessary for a film. It was noted during
the press conference that in 2005, goods worth a total of about 11 mln
USD were imported into Armenia from India, and exports from Armenia
to India made about 400 thousand USD. The two countries are closely
cooperating in the spheres of culture, education and science.

Kapan “Gandzasar” Winner Of Hunan Avetisian Memorial Tournament

KAPAN “GANDZASAR” WINNER OF HUNAN AVETISIAN MEMORIAL TOURNAMENT

Noyan Tapan
Mar 20 2006

YEREVAN, MARCH 20, NOYAN TAPAN. The traditional memorial tournament
after Soviet Union hero Hunan Avetisian held on Armavir “Jubilee”
sports ground was over. 9 teams of Armenian championship highest
and first group took part in it. First they competed in 2 groups
where those who took the first places competed for the prize. Kapan
“Gandzasar” and Yerevan “Banants-2” teams competed with each other
in the final. “Gandzasar” defeated the latter with a score of 3 to
0 and won the cup. The prize was given to the winner team by hero’s
son, Henzel Avetisian. The tournament organizers had also instituted
prizes for football-players that distinguished themselves in separate
game links.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Levon Aronian Defeats Veselin Topalov

LEVON ARONIAN DEFEATS VESELIN TOPALOV

Noyan Tapan
Mar 20 2006

YEREVAN, MARCH 20, NOYAN TAPAN. A unique chess tournament under the
title “Amber” started in Monte Carlo. 12 strongest chess-players
hold small competitions with one another. Each competition consists
of a “blind” and a quick game. After 2 tours 5 chess-players are
at once in the lead. They are: Levon Aronian (Armenia), Peter Leko
(Hungary), Veselin Topalov (Bulgaria), Alexander Morozevich (Russia)
and Francisco Valekho (Spain). They gained 2.5 out of 4 possible points
each. Representative of Armenia, world cup-holder Levon Aronian drew
the game with Dutch Van Veli in the first tour (1 to 1) and defeated
world champion, Bulgarian Topalov in the second tour with a score of
1.5 to 0.5. The “Amber” tournament participants will play 22 games
in total. The winner and the other prize-winners will become known
on March 30.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian Boxers Win 2 Prizes

ARMENIAN BOXERS WIN 2 PRIZES

Noyan Tapan
Mar 20 2006

YEREVAN, MARCH 20, NOYAN TAPAN. Very strong boxers took part in
the memorial tournament after famous boxing specialist Felix Shtam
held in Warsaw. Nevertheless, 2 out of 5 members of the Armenian
national team taking part in the competitions succeeded in becoming
prize-winners. Gabriel Tolmogian, a boxer from Yerevan who performed in
the 54 kg weight category, took the second place and Samvel Matevosian,
a young boxer from Vanadzor, 69 kg weight category, took the 3rd palce.

Welcome Players: A New Drive To Help Refugee Scholars Will Benefit N

WELCOME PLAYERS: A NEW DRIVE TO HELP REFUGEE SCHOLARS WILL BENEFIT NOT ONLY THEM BUT ALSO THE CAUSE OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM
Donald Macleod

The Guardian – United Kingdom
Mar 21, 2006

A long, painful journey brought Nahro Zagros from classically trained
violinist and lecturer in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq to playing gigs in
Hull with a band called Yorkshire Kurd.

Soon he is off on another journey to Armenia to study the music and
culture of the semi-nomadic Yezidis. For, with help from the Council
for Assisting Refugee Academics (Cara), Zagros is doing a masters
degree in ethnomusicology at York University, researching how music
can display cultural identity.

The young Kurdish musician is one of about 60 currently being helped
by Cara, an organisation that originated in 1933 to help academic
refugees from Hitler’s Germany. Over the decades the countries of
origin have changed – South Africa in the 1960s, Iraq and Iran in
the 1980s and 1990s – but the need has remained.

Indeed, only a tiny fraction of refugee academics receive help. Last
week the president of New York University, John Sexton, was in London
to launch the UK network of Scholars at Risk, set up in collaboration
with Cara to try and reach more of them.

He told a meeting at the British Academy that by helping academics
under extreme threat, they were protecting their own academic freedom
against less dramatic, but real encroachments.

“There is a vital connection between the aggressive struggle against
the most extreme cases of denial of academic freedom – cases that
take the form of threats and harassment, loss of jobs, and even
imprisonment and physical harm – and the less dramatic, but constant,
struggle against gradual encroachments on our own academic vocations,”
said Sexton, whose university is home to Scholars at Risk.

Zagros found himself among the extreme cases when he was a music
lecturer at Iraq’s Institute of Fine Arts and conductor of an orchestra
that toured in the Middle East and Europe. He worked for a television
station owned by Uday Hussein and was pressured into becoming involved
in events run by Uday.

Following a short visit to Kurdistan to see his relatives, he was
imprisoned for nearly six months in 2000. He fled Iraq shortly
afterwards.

Dispersed to Hull, he sought out other musicians and formed Yorkshire
Kurd, playing gigs to raise money for refugees and giving workshops
and performances in local schools to promote diversity. They have
also performed at festivals in Britain and abroad, playing a fusion
of Middle Eastern music, swing jazz, eastern European Gypsy music and
Jewish klezmer. “We like to combine all these great tunes and show
people we can work together and promote integration through music.”

Without Cara, he says, he could not have resumed study at York and
researched the Yezidis, a group of Kurds from Turkey who took refuge
in Armenia in the 1880s. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union,
a combination of unemployment and resurgent Armenian nationalism is
threatening their culture, says Zagros.

There are plenty of other stories to tell – the Iranian professor
of paediatrics, the Iraqi medical lecturer, both now establishing
themselves in this country, for instance. Applications for refugee
status in the UK are falling, but pleas for help from academics
continue to increase, says John Akker, executive secretary of Cara. He
estimates that of the 10,000 refugees in Glasgow, nearly 1,000 have
a substantial academic background.

Cara has recently been given pounds 500,000 over five years from the
Lisbet Rausing charitable fund to help with grants to scholars. With
the Scholars at Risk network, Cara is planning how universities
could use their services in such areas as HR, student services,
language centres, accommodation, welfare, childcare and international
activities, to help.

So far 15 UK universities have joined. Birkbeck College London,
Cambridge, Leeds Metropolitan, London South Bank University, York,
Glasgow Caledonian, London University, Wolverhampton, Kent and
Universities UK are represented on the board. The Open University,
Luton, School of Oriental and African Studies, Sunderland, Ulster and
Lincoln are members, and University College London, London School of
Economics, Keele, Manchester, King’s College London, and Oxford are
expected to join soon.

The payoff to Britain for sheltering academic refugees has been
spectacular. Of Cara’s former grantees, who included names like
Karl Popper and Max Perutz, 18 became Nobel laureates, 16 received
knighthoods, 71 were made fellows or foreign members of the Royal
Society, and 50 fellows of the British Academy.

But Sexton made a rather different case for the work of Cara and
Scholars at Risk -helping defend academic freedom against more
subtle pressures from outside the university, or even from political
correctness within academe.

“The race of our century will be a race between the university and
the madrasa; and it is important from the outset that we understand
the differences between the two,” he said.

“Xenophobes and ideologues seek to influence the research we undertake,
the books we write or the classes we teach. Thus, for example, in the
United States, research universities are pressurised to forgo stem
cell research, and pressed to meet externally defined ideological
quotas for faculty. And every university president at some point faces
enormous external pressure because a speaker deemed ‘controversial’
is coming to campus . . .

“For if not anchored in the causes and consequences of extreme threats,
our claims on behalf of academic freedom can too easily be construed
as petty disputes by a privileged elite demanding special rights
without corresponding responsibilities. Being able to locate the
complaints and warnings of those who fear government encroachment,
or attempts to quell disturbing speech or provocative research, along
the same spectrum that stretches to the more extreme and violent
forms of intellectual repression, forces a discussion of the central
importance of the principle of academic freedom. By seeing what happens
in societies where universities and scholars are put at extreme risk,
we come to better appreciate why we defend what we do and better
recognise the warning signs of the erosion of those freedoms.”

Cara, London South Bank University Technopark, 90 London Road,
London SE1 6LN Email: [email protected]
du

Iraqi musician Nahro Zagros fled his homeland after he was put under
pressure and imprisoned there Photograph: John Jones.

www.academic-refugees.org
www.scholarsatrisk.nyu.e