Armenia Credits Indian Arms Deal for Breaking Global Reluctance to Supply Esse

Defence India
Sept 28, 2026
  • Thread starter Raj Basu
Armenia’s Defence Minister Suren Papikyan has highlighted India’s crucial role in transforming the global arms market dynamics for Yerevan.

Following the border conflict in September 2022, Armenia sought to protect its territorial integrity by acquiring modern weaponry.

Papikyan noted that India’s bold decision to supply essential defensive systems shattered international reluctance, setting a precedent that other nations could legitimately provide military equipment to Armenia.


This strategic shift occurred after Armenia lost confidence in its traditional security alliances, particularly the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).

With prior weapons orders from Russia remaining unfulfilled despite advance payments, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan emphasised the need for urgent diversification.

The diplomatic breakthrough during the October 2022 Prague process, where Armenia and Azerbaijan mutually recognised each other’s borders, further accelerated Yerevan’s quest for reliable defence partners.

Consequently, Armenia effectively suspended its active participation in the CSTO proceedings and turned toward new geopolitical allies.

India rapidly emerged as Armenia’s largest new defence supplier, fulfilling a massive military modernization requirement.

The extensive procurement portfolio from Indian manufacturers includes Pinaka multi-barrel rocket launchers, Advanced Towed Artillery Gun Systems (ATAGS), MArG 155mm wheeled self-propelled howitzers, and Swathi weapon locating radars.

Furthermore, Armenia has bolstered its airspace protection by acquiring the Akash-1S air-defence system and advanced counter-drone technologies from India.

Global security analysts estimate that recent defence contracts between New Delhi and Yerevan are worth hundreds of millions of dollars, marking a major milestone in their bilateral relations.

India’s willingness to export these critical systems provided both the justification and the momentum for other global powers to reconsider unwritten restrictions on arms sales to Armenia.

Analysts from the Swedish Institute of International Affairs and other regional think tanks have noted that France quickly followed suit, becoming Armenia’s principal Western security partner.

Paris has since signed contracts to supply advanced military hardware, including CAESAR self-propelled howitzers.

Ultimately, India’s initial involvement acted as the cornerstone of Armenia’s new multi-aligned defence doctrine, ensuring the nation can secure its borders while navigating a complex regional security environment.


https://defence.in/threads/armenia-credits-indian-arms-deal-for-breaking-global-reluctance-to-supply-essential-defensive-military-equipment.18797/ 

—

Georgia expels Belarusian activist to Armenia after refusing asylum claim

OC Media
Sept 28, 2026
Georgia

Georgia expelled Belarusian activist Lev Mikheev, who had unsuccessfully been seeking political asylum since 2021. Georgia deported Mikheev to Armenia, where he was briefly detained, but then released.

Mikheev was detained by Georgian migration authorities on 25 September and expelled to Armenia hours later. He had lived in Georgia for five years before he was expelled, he told independent Belarusian media outlet Pozirk.

Tbilisi-based rights group Rights Georgia, which sought to get involved in the case, said it was unable to visit Mikheev in time because of the hours set by the Migration Department. When a lawyer arrived at the department at the start of working hours the following day, they were told that the activist had left the country late the previous night.

Mikheev said that two weeks before his detention, he had gone to Martkopi — a village 30 kilometres east of Tbilisi, where the Migration Department’s reception centre is located — to legally renew his locally-issued temporary ID document. Mikheev noted that his application was accepted and he was told to return in two weeks. When he did, the Department told him he had to go with them back to Tbilisi, then took his phone and drove him away.

‘I only managed to send [Tbilisi-based Belarusian human rights activist] Roman [Kislyak] a short message before they took my phone. From that moment on, I was practically like a prisoner’, he said as quoted by Pozirk.

According to Mikheev, at the Migration Department’s office in Tbilisi, a person responsible for his case told him that he was residing in the country illegally and that his identification document, which the activist said was still valid, ‘was completely irrelevant’.

He was reportedly given two options: ‘to be thrown out of Georgia in handcuffs’ or to leave the country voluntarily, an option offered to foreigners detained for allegedly illegally staying in Georgia if they have the necessary travel documents.

Mikheev said he refused to return to Belarus since he was ‘seeking asylum precisely because he was being persecuted in his home country’. He also asked for a short extension to remain in Georgia, at least until 9 October, when his identification document was due to expire, but was rejected.

‘They herded me from office to office. A doctor came and stripped me down to my underwear — it was absolutely horrific. Then we went home, I packed a few things, and we went to the police station’, he said. Mikheev said he was ‘dumped’ on the Georgian–Armenian border.

Before being expelled, he said he was ‘forced to sign a lot of papers’ in Georgian, the meaning of which, as Pozirk noted, he did not understand.

Tbilisi-based rights group Rights Georgia, which sought to get involved in the case, stated it was unable to visit Mikheev in time because of the hours set by the Migration Department. When a lawyer arrived at the department at the start of working hours the following day, they were told that the activist had left the country late the previous night.

Responding to media reports, the Migration Department noted the information had been presented ‘incorrectly and in a distorted manner’, denying that Mikheev did not understand what he was signing.

‘Before signing the documents, he was provided with the relevant information and their contents were explained to him through an interpreter’, the agency said in a statement published on the Interior Ministry’s website on 26 September.

The agency further stated that Mikheev’s 2021 asylum application, which was based on his political activity in Belarus, was rejected in September 2024 because there were ‘no legal grounds for granting him the status’.

Mikheev appealed the rejection, but two courts upheld the decision. The agency noted that, as a result, he ceased to be considered an asylum seeker in June 2026 and was detained three months later for staying in Georgia ‘without a legal basis’.

The department also emphasised that Mikheev chose Armenia himself as a destination — something the activist confirmed, although calling it ‘a choice without a choice’.

‘I was terrified of the option where they would choose the destination country. For example, Kazakhstan or Azerbaijan. So I agreed to Armenia’.

‘I realised they were simply crazy here. It’s difficult to argue with them about anything. Let it be Armenia. And the process started rolling’, Mikheev explained.

At the border, he was briefly detained by Armenian law enforcement. Belarusian media attributed the detention to an interstate search request issued for Mikheev by Belarusian authorities through the Russia-led Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), of which both Armenia and Belarus are members.

According to Mikheev, he was shown documents indicating that Belarusian authorities had opened a criminal case against him on charges of insulting President Aliaksandr Lukashenka.

‘I said, “You know, Lukashenko isn’t president”. They smiled and nodded’, he recalled.

After spending the night at the police station, the activist was on the afternoon of 26 September. He said that he was satisfied with how he was treated by the Armenian authorities, in contrast to his experience in Georgia.

Mikheev now plans to seek a legal assessment of the Georgian migration service’s handling of his case. The United Transitional Cabinet of Belarus — the Belarusian government-in-exile — which followed the case, was cited by Pozirk as saying they were setting up legal counsel for Mikheev in Georgia.

‘The most unpleasant thing here is this lack of rights and humiliation of a man who has done nothing illegal’, Mikheev said.

Belarus was swept by brutal state repression in response to mass protests following the 2020 presidential election, which is widely considered to have been rigged by Lukashenka’s government against his main opponent, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya.

Some Belarusians fleeing repression moved to Georgia. While some later left, including for EU states, others remained in the country.

—

Armenian Public TV apologises for airing upbeat pop concert on war anniversary

OC Media
Sept 28, 2026

Public TV aired an upbeat 2024 concert by the pop singer Tata Simonyan on Sunday, the sixth anniversary of the start of the Second Karabakh War, sparking outrage. On Monday, the broadcaster shared an apology, describing the choice as a ‘mistake’.

This is not the first time that Public TV has been at the centre of controversy concerning its coverage of Nagorno-Karabakh. Earlier in September, Public TV did not acknowledge the third anniversary of the 2023 exodus of Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh.

Addressing outrage at the concert’s festive tone on social media, Public TV shared an apology on Monday. They said that they are reviewing relevant procedures to prevent such cases from happening again.

‘Dear viewers, the entertainment concert broadcast on the Public Television Company’s air on 27 September was a mistake, and we fully accept responsibility for it. We will not try to justify what happened by citing programming, technical, or operational circumstances. We apologise for what happened’, the statement read.

The statement followed an earlier reaction from the artist whose concert was aired on Sunday, Tata Simonyan, who condemned the broadcast and said the concert was aired without his consent.

‘I apologise for what happened, but I consider it important to note that the concert is the property of the Public Television Company. The material was used without my consent. I consider the Public Television Company’s broadcast of my concert on this day to be a gross error with no justification’, he wrote.

The concert was organised as part of the Festivar series of state-funded cultural events following a pattern of similar initiatives launched by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan since he came to power in 2018. Critics argue that the concerts allow Pashinyan to shift focus from pressing security concerns. In the past, some have also raised questions about the transparency of the selection process for those contracted to organise the events.

This is not the first time that Public TV has been at the centre of accusations that it is promoting the ruling party’s agenda.

Since the war and displacement of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians, Pashinyan has repeatedly stated that the Nagorno-Karabakh issue was closed, claiming this is essential for the peace process. In step with Pashinyan’s approach, ruling party officials have avoided making public announcements to mark anniversaries and visiting the Yerablur Military Pantheon, where people usually pay their respects to those who died in the war.

The host of Public TV’s late-night political interview show, Petros Ghazaryan, has been often criticised for favouring guests from the ruling party. An analysis of 426 interviews by independent journalist Katya Mamyan found that more than half of Ghazaryan’s airtime was occupied by Civil Contract party members.

On 19 September, Public TV did not mention that it was the third anniversary of the displacement of Karabakh Armenians, when 120,000 Armenians were displaced following a large-scale assault by Azerbaijan. This assault came after a blockade of the region lasting almost 10 months. Public TV did not address the criticism it received for not acknowledging the war or its consequences.

—

‘Yet another fabrication’: Armenia denies conceding land to Azerbaijan during

OC Media
Sept 29, 2026

Armenia has denied reports circulating on social media that they conceded five combat positions in the north to Azerbaijan during the border demarcation process.

OC Media was unable to find the original source for the reports that Yerevan was rebutting. A couple of social media posts spread the news on Facebook without giving a specific source.

Armenia’s Defence Ministry called claims that four or five Armenian positions near the village of Berdavan in the Tavush Province had come under Azerbaijani control ‘yet another fabrication’, with the local authorities in Noyemberyan also denying the claims.

The Office of Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan has also issued a statement denying that Armenia made the concessions and said the reports did not correspond to reality.

The border delimitation commissions of the two countries were created in 2022. Armenia’s commission is headed by Grigoryan, while Azerbaijan’s is headed by Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafayev.

In 2024, Armenia’s agreement to delimit parts of its border with Azerbaijan, with a potential transfer of control over four disputed villages sparked protests in Tavush. The protests then escalated into a larger movement, Tavush for the Motherland, led by Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan. Residents raised security concerns and accused the government of making unilateral concessions.

On 5 September 2025, the heads of the border delimitation commissions of the two countries made reciprocal visits across the Armenia–Azerbaijan border. This was the first confirmed instance of the two officials visiting each other’s territory.

Armenian and Azerbaijani border delimitation chairs cross border in historic first

Earlier this year, the Defence Ministry rejected another claim that positions near Jermuk had been handed to Azerbaijan.

In early September, controversy erupted in Armenia after a newspaper quoted a local official as saying that Azerbaijan had attempted to advance towards the Hakari Bridge, which connected Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh.

Local officials have denied the reports.

—

European observers criticise Armenia’s decision to annul results in three pol

OC Media
Sept 29, 2026

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) concluded Armenia’s parliamentary elections offered voters a genuine choice and were well run. However, PACE criticised the Central Election Commission (CEC) for annulling the results at three polling stations, claiming that the excluded results could have affected the election outcome. The report suggests amending the electoral law to address this issue in the future.

In the June parliamentary elections, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party won with 49.75% of the vote, winning 64 seats in parliament: a three-fifths majority.

Gagik Tsarukyan’s Prosperous Armenia party came close to entering parliament; Following a recount at several polling stations, the party secured 3.98% of the vote, falling just 0.02 percentage points short of the 4% threshold required.

The PACE report criticised the Commission’s choice to annul results in three polling stations. The CEC said they annulled the vote at these stations as, in two cases, members of the military were permitted to vote after the legal closing time. At the third station, ballots for one party were missing for most of the day.

According to calculations cited in PACE’s report, including the results from these stations could have put Prosperous Armenia over the threshold: which would have prevented Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party from achieving a three-fifth majority in parliament.

Losing this majority would prevent Civil Contract from appointing Constitutional Court judges independently and amending certain aspects of national electoral legislation. Even without Prosperous Armenia in parliament, Pashinyan still lacks the constitutional majority required to hold a referendum to amend the constitution, which he has repeatedly stated he wants to do.

Pashinyan’s Civil Contract wins parliamentary elections

The CEC declined to order a revote at the time, explaining that the invalidation did not affect the overall result. The PACE delegation described this justification as ‘very insufficient’ given the stakes.

RFE/RL reports that the CEC had previously justified their decision to hold the vote again on the basis that voters would already be aware of the number of votes each party needed to win. While the report acknowledges that the CEC cited a Venice Commission opinion on the risk of tactical voting in repeat polls, it notes that the commission’s opinion does not rule out a vote if the outcome would fundamentally change the allocation of seats.

To avoid such situations, the delegation recommends amending the electoral code to explicitly require the election to be re-held when it could fundamentally change the results.

Neither the CEC nor the government had responded to the observations. Prosperous Armenia welcomed the recommendations.

‘Of course the parliament has been formed, but this parliament will go down in history as the parliament that deprived one parliamentary faction of the chance to enter it. The historical fact has now been recorded. It is on record that, thanks to the arbitrariness of this particular government, Prosperous Armenia has been deprived of the opportunity to appear in parliament’, the party’s spokesperson Iveta Tonoyan told RFE/RL.

In July, Armenian authorities arrested Tsarukyan for alleged money laundering. He denied the charges and called them ‘fabricated’.

Armenian government faces uphill battle over new constitution following election results

Russian interference

The report states that the scale of Russian interference and foreign information operations was unprecedented for a Council of Europe member state. The report mentions several ways in which Russia tried to interfere, including restrictions on Armenian exports such as flowers, mineral water, and alcohol; threats to revise gas and oil supply terms; the demand from Eurasian Economic Union leaders that Armenia hold a referendum on choosing between the bloc and the EU; and Russian-linked information campaigns and threats against Armenian citizens and business owners. However, the delegation said allegations that tens of thousands of Russian-based Armenians would be brought in to vote remain unproven.

Observers also noted that Western leaders’ endorsement of the ruling party, including the US and French presidents, was perceived as interfering too, but the report describes these as far milder and non-coercive.

Abuse of administrative power

The PACE delegation noted significant ongoing gaps such as a lack of effective safeguards and proportionate sanctioning against administrative abuse. The delegation raised concerns about equal opportunities for political parties and stated that the campaign had become polarised. The delegation found that there were more than 200 investigations into suspected vote-buying, primarily targeting the opposition. This reinforced the perception of selective prosecution, and no convictions had been recorded by the time the report was written.

Employees in the public sector reported feeling pressured to attend rallies organised by the ruling party. Pre-election social measures, such as debt forgiveness and benefit increases, were seen as de facto campaign tools. While public television and key private broadcasters displayed a clear pro-government bias, other outlets were consistently critical of the government. The campaign also used AI-generated deepfakes.

Finally, the report noted an increase in voter turnout to 58.97%, up from 48.62% in 2018 and 49.40% in 2021. However, only 45% of polling stations were independently accessible to voters with disabilities. Observers recorded violations in around 44% of the observed precincts, primarily consisting of procedural errors, overcrowding, and breaches of secrecy.

Although the PACE 2021 report on the previous parliamentary elections did not have a single figure for violations, it stated that voting was rated positively in 98% of stations, with overcrowding in 14%, proxy or other interference in 6%,  and secrecy problems in 4%. The Prosecutor’s Office logged 319 election-day complaints.

—

Armenia’s ruling party wins municipal elections uncontested

OC Media
Sept 29, 2026

On Sunday, the Civil Contract party was re-elected in two of the four Armenian communities where municipal elections were held, having run uncontested. The opposition, which had promised to field candidates in the regional elections, did not do so.

In two other communities, the results have yet to be announced.

This fall, 19 areas will hold municipal elections, but the opposition isn’t contesting them widely. Strong Armenia will run only in Stepanavan, while in Hrazdan, Tsakhadzor, Martuni, Araks and Artashat the opposition will be represented by candidates from the Armenia Alliance.

Civil Contract’s candidate for the town of Tumanyan in Armenia’s Lori province, Suren Tumanyan, has been re-elected with 95.1% of the vote. He ran uncontested. In 2021 Tumanyan ran in the local elections on the opposition Republican Party list and defeated Civil Contract. He left the opposition party and joined the ruling party in 2026. He confirmed the move to Factor.am, without explaining why he left the Republican Party.

The ruling Civil Contract party often recruits popular candidates from other parties. In Goris, for example, Mayor Arush Arushanyan, a former vocal critic of the government who accused Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan of losing Nagorno-Karabakh before, will ally with Civil Contract in the next elections.

Prior to the election, Pashinyan announced they would form an electoral alliance with Arushanyan’s Business Party. While Goris voters backed Civil Contract in the 2021 parliamentary election, they elected Arushanyan as mayor in the local vote that same year. Pashinyan said that the decision also reflects a wish to avoid renewed tensions in the community and added that similar ‘solidarity alliances’ could be formed in other communities.

Strong Armenia, the largest opposition force in parliament, won 26% in the Tumanyan community in June but fielded no candidate in its local election. The faction’s secretary, Tigran Abrahamyan, told Factor.am that the party will contest some local elections and skip others, focusing on communities where it sees a high chance of winning.

Tumanyan is the largest of the four communities holding elections, with a population of over 4,000. The council here is elected under the proportional system. Because Civil Contract was the only party standing, voters could only vote ‘for’ or ‘against,’ which meant the party needed more than half of the votes cast, with no minimum turnout thresholds. In Tumanyan, 2,390 of 2,520 participants voted for Civil Contract (95.1%), 123 voted against (4.9%), and seven ballots were invalid, according to Mkrtchyan.

On Sunday, Lermontovo in the Lori province, Ferik in Armavir, and Arzni in Kotayk also held local elections. In Lermontovo, Edik Chakhalyan, backed by Civil Contract, was re-elected community head with 96.6%, Governor Mkrtchyan announced.

In Ferik and Arzni, only the city council was elected. Ferik is a Yezidi-populated village where five people were nominated for five positions. At the time of writing, the Central Electoral Commission had not yet published the official results, but announced the voter turnout figures for Tumanyan (around 60%), Ferik (57%), Lermontovos (35%), and Arzni (45%).

—

Removing Catholicos Garegin II from office to resolve crisis: Armenia debates

JAM News
Sept 29, 2026
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

“Violation of vows of celibacy and proper conduct, politicisation of the Holy Altar, spread of foreign [Russian] influence and persecution of clergy.” These are among the arguments cited by the Public Relations and Information Centre as evidence of a crisis in the Armenian Apostolic Church. The centre prepared and published the report at the request of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

The 74-page document sets out not only information identified from open sources that its authors say demonstrates a crisis, but also proposals for resolving it.

Among the steps proposed to resolve the crisis is the removal of Catholicos of All Armenians Garegin II. The report refers to him not as the Catholicos, but as the “de facto head of the Church”.

The authors stress that reform should be carried out by the Church itself, with the participation of clergy and believers, while the state should act within its legal powers “without interfering in the Church’s internal canonical autonomy”.

Meanwhile, the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin has described the report as “unconstitutional, anti-canonical and unlawful in both content and form”.

In a statement issued in response, the senior clergy called on the authorities to “end the persecution of the Church and respect its centuries-old sovereignty and self-governance”.

Human rights advocates have also raised concerns about the document. Anna Melikyan, a lawyer and expert on international humanitarian law and human rights, argues that the government has no right to interfere in the internal affairs of a religious organisation unless “a crime or administrative offence” has been committed.

Religious freedom expert Izabella Sargsyan focuses on information contained in the document that she says “violates human rights and the right to privacy”. She said the report reminded her of “a tabloid publication”.


  • Armenia’s Anti-Corruption Commission did not open proceedings against Pashinyan
  • ‘From crisis management to stability’: Pashinyan unveils new government programme
  • Armenia’s new parliament holds first session as opposition, as expected, makes its presence felt

Pashinyan: ‘Situation in Church far more critical than I thought’

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan commented on the report shortly after its publication. In a video address posted on his Facebook page, Pashinyan said he had reviewed the document and concluded that the actual situation in the Church was far more complex and critical than he had initially believed:

“If I were to sum up the report in one sentence, it proves that the Church has been captured by Ktrich Nersisyan [Garegin II’s secular name] and a group of clergy and laypeople who support him.”

In a recent interview, Pashinyan did not rule out establishing an investigative commission in the National Assembly that would propose legislative changes based on the problems identified in the report.

Report cites allegations of ‘paedophilia and homosexual tendencies’

The report lists 16 points that its authors say demonstrate a crisis within the Church. One concerns alleged violations of vows of celibacy and proper conduct by senior clergy. The document also says such cases have not received appropriate attention or investigation from the Church’s senior leadership.

The authors include cases of child sexual abuse among violations of “proper conduct”. According to the report, allegations have also been made against the Catholicos’s brother:

“The most serious allegations concerning the sexual abuse of children relate to the brother of the de facto head of the Armenian Apostolic Church [Garegin II] – Archbishop Yezras Nersisyan, Primate of the Russian and New Nakhichevan Diocese.”

The document also says there are claims concerning his “homosexual tendencies”. It cites various articles, open letters – mostly by defrocked clergy – and media reports as supporting material.

The report includes personal information about both those whose accounts it cites and those accused of “paedophilia” or described as having “homosexual tendencies”.

“Moral decline has become entrenched within the Church’s internal structures. Some clergy suspected or accused of sexual offences, particularly paedophilia, not only go unpunished but also enjoy the protection of the senior leadership,”the document says.

Among the alleged problems within the Church highlighted by the report are:

  • the Catholicos’s alleged violation of his vow of celibacy;
  • alleged persecution and defrocking of clergy by the Catholicos;
  • overt political activity by the Catholicos and several senior clergy;
  • the use of Church premises and the Holy Altar for political campaigning;
  • the alleged use of the Church by the Catholicos and members of his family to promote foreign influence;
  • a lack of financial transparency and alleged misuse of Church property;
  • the ordination of relatives and alleged clan-based governance;
  • the failure to convene a National Ecclesiastical Assembly for 27 consecutive years and the absence of a unified charter;
  • divisions within dioceses in the diaspora.

What action plan is proposed?

The report proposes a five-step roadmap for overcoming the crisis:

  • reviewing and promoting the reform programme;
  • removing the de facto head of the Church (the Catholicos);
  • electing a locum tenens;
  • adopting a unified Church charter;
  • convening a National Ecclesiastical Assembly in accordance with procedures set out in the new charter and electing the Catholicos of All Armenians.

Mother See calls report ‘an act of political retribution’

“The ‘report’, compiled using public funds and based on accusations and defamatory claims circulated on social media and in the media, is an act of political retribution, vindictiveness and unacceptable interference in the internal life of the Church,” the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin said.

The clergy called on the Armenian authorities to build Church-state relations on the basis of mutual respect, a clear separation of powers and the primacy of national interests. They also called for:

  • “an end to the persecution of clergy and the popularly elected Catholicos of All Armenians through fabricated accusations and defamation;
  • action strictly within the framework of the Constitution, national legislation and international law, in line with proclaimed democratic principles, guaranteeing freedom of conscience, religion and belief in the country and strengthening social solidarity rather than division;
  • existing problems and disagreements to be resolved through dialogue, without preconditions and without resorting to futile ultimatum-style rhetoric.”

According to the Mother See’s statement, the authorities are attempting to artificially create a crisis within the Church:

“Any initiatives to reform the Church that are driven by political arbitrariness, manipulation or coercion are unacceptable. Efforts to address the challenges facing the Armenian Church and improve its functioning are carried out exclusively on the basis of decisions by the Church’s highest canonical governing bodies.”

According to religious freedom expert Izabella Sargsyan, the government has no right to interfere in the Church’s internal affairs or prepare reports of this kind.

She argues that the report is unacceptable from the standpoint of legality, ethics and human dignity:

“This is not simply about freedom of religion or belief, or about an abuse of power by the government. It concerns personal data and the publication of names, including that of a minor who was allegedly subjected to sexual abuse.”

International humanitarian law and human rights expert Anna Melikyan stressed that Armenia’s Constitution clearly defines the relationship between the government and religious organisations, including their freedom of activity, separation from the state and autonomy:

“Freedom and autonomy mean that the government has no right to interfere in the internal affairs of a religious organisation, including its choice of governance system or efforts to bring it into line with canonical and ethical norms.”

She insists that neither the executive nor the legislature can decide who should lead a religious organisation or what internal rules it should adopt unless a criminal or administrative offence has been identified:

“If there are facts that provide reasonable grounds to suspect clear criminal or administrative offences, there are other mechanisms for responding to them – through criminal or administrative proceedings.”

The human rights expert says the confrontation between the government and the Church should be viewed in terms of the legality of the government’s actions in order to prevent possible unlawful interference.

She says an effective system of checks and balances should operate in a democratic state to prevent governments from being tempted to overstep their powers:

“All states and governments face this temptation, and if they encounter no resistance, they will seize as much power as they can.”

https://jam-news.net/report-on-crisis-in-armenian-church/ 

—

California Courier Online, Sept. 28, 2026

California Courier Online,
Sept. 28, 2026

—

Հիվանդագին մոտեցում է․ Րաֆֆի Հովհաննիսյան

Հիվանդագին մոտեցում է

Oragir.News-ի «Բաստիոն» հաղորդաշարի տաղավարում Գևորգ Էմին-Տերյանը հյուրընկալել է «Ժառանգություն» կուսակցության առաջնորդ Րաֆֆի Հովհաննիսյանին։

Զրուցակիցներն անդրադարձել են Արցախյան 44-օրյա պատերազմին, դրա պատճառներին և ներկա իրավիճակին։

Րաֆֆի Հովհաննիսյանը հիվանդագին մոտեցում է որակել այն թեզը, թե իբր Արցախի կորուստն ու զոհերը պետք էին, որ ինքնիշխան դառնանք։

Մանրամասները՝ տեսանյութում։

դեռ չէր ունեցել։


-Այս փոքրիկ խմբակը պատասխանատվություն չի՛ կրում ո՛չ հայրենազրկման, ո՛չ հանձնման, ո՛չ ընտրախախտումների համար․ նպատակը միայն սեփական աթոռը պահպանելն է։


-Ստեղծված իրավիճակում հայ ժողովրդի գերակշիռ մեծամասնությունն ընդդիմադիր գործիչներից ակնկալում է նոր մոտեցում՝ հանրապետական հրամայականի օրակարգով։


-Մանդատները վերցնելու դեպքում սովորական պայքար չպետք է ծավալել։ Կուսակցական «գլխարկներով» միանձնյա պայքարը շարունակել այլևս հնարավոր չէ։ Հայ ժողովրդին համազգային լուծում է պետք։


-Փաշինյանի իշխանությունը 5 տարի չի՛ ձգելու։ Թույլ, վախկոտ ու պատասխանատվություն վերցնել չկարողացող իշխանություն է։


-Հայաստանի վերջին նվաստացումն են ապահովում Թուրքիան և Ադրբեջանը։


-ՔՊ-ի բերած խաղաղությունը հայ ժողովրդին բերելու է պատերազմ։ Փաշինյանը պետք է գնա, որ ազգն ունենա շնչելու հնարավորություն։


Մանրամասները՝ տեսանյութում։

—

«Իսլամական հեղափոխության գրականություն» գրքի շնորհանդեսը ԵՊՀ-ում

Հարգելի՛ գործընկեր, 
Սեպտեմբերի 30-ին՝ ժամը 15։00-ին, իրանցի մեծ բանաստեղծ և մտածող Մոլանայի՝
Ջալալ ադ-Դին Մուհամմադ Բալխիի մեծարման օրվա հետ համահունչ, Երևանի պետական
համալսարանի արևելագիտության ֆակուլտետի Ֆիրդուսու անվան լսարանում տեղի կունենա
«Իսլամական հեղափոխության գրականություն» ուսումնասիրության հայերեն թարգմանության
շնորհանդեսը։

Գիրքը հայերեն է լույս տեսել ՀՀ-ում Իրանի Իսլամական Հանրապետության
դեսպանության մշակույթի կենտրոնի և ԵՊՀ արևելագիտության ֆակուլտետի իրանագիտության
ամբիոնի համագործակցության շրջանակում։

Աշխատությունն անդրադառնում է Իրանի ժամանակակից գրականության անքակտելի մասը
կազմող իսլամական հեղափոխության գրական շրջանին, Իրանի մշակութային և ազգային
ինքնության ձևավորման կարևոր բաղադրիչներին, դրանց գաղափարական և գոյաբանական
հիմքերին, ինչպես նաև շիայական կենսափիլիսոփայության դերին Իրանի ազգային
ինքնության համատեքստում։

Գրքի հայերեն թարգմանությունը կատարել է ԵՊՀ իրանագիտության ամբիոնի դոցենտ,
բանասիրական գիտությունների թեկնածու Գառնիկ Գևորգյանը։

📅Սեպտեմբերի 30
🕒Ժամը՝ 15։00
📍ԵՊՀ արևելագիտության ֆակուլտետ, Ֆիրդուսու անվան լսարան

Սիրով հրավիրում ենք Ձեզ մասնակցելու միջոցառմանը։

—