Judicial reforms, digitalisation discussed at meeting between Supreme Judicial

Law20:31, 20 May 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Supreme Judicial Council of Armenia Chairman Artur Atabekyan has received a delegation led by Lilja Gretarsdottir, head of the Human Rights and Justice Cooperation Department at the Council of Europe, the Judicial Department said in a statement.

Welcoming the delegation, Atabekyan expressed gratitude to the Council of Europe for its support provided within the framework of the “Support to the Implementation of Judicial Reforms in Armenia” programme.

He highlighted effective cooperation in developing legal regulations on appeal procedures for decisions of the Supreme Judicial Council, as well as the provision of expert opinions and professional consultations aimed at improving court administration procedures, describing them as a significant contribution to the efficient organisation of justice and the institutional development of the judicial system.

The sides also discussed reforms aimed at reducing court workload, implemented with the substantial involvement of Council of Europe experts and programmes, along with related statistics.

In this context, particular attention was paid to the prospects for developing alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, with emphasis on the institution of mediation.

The meeting also addressed priorities and future directions to be included in the new Council of Europe-Armenia Action Plan currently under development.

Discussions further focused on the digitalisation of the judicial system and the use of artificial intelligence, regulations on personal data protection and data anonymisation in courts, as well as the importance of developing new comprehensive solutions aimed at easing the burden on courts.

At the request of the European delegation, Atabekyan presented ongoing efforts carried out with international partners to strengthen public trust in the judiciary, centred on cooperation between the judicial system, civil society and the media. He also stressed the importance of fostering an inclusive environment through dialogue with civil society.

At the end of the meeting, the participants underlined the need to develop a new action programme in the format of a working discussion within a short timeframe.

The meeting was also attended by Anahit Abrahamyan, Head of the Council of Europe Office in Yerevan Maxime Longangue, First Deputy Head of the Judicial Department Arshak Vardapetyan, and Deputy Director of the Council of Europe’s Programme Division on Legal Reforms and Human Rights Cooperation Lilit Daneghyan.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Human rights safeguards in elections discussed at meeting with OSCE/ODIHR obse

Armenia21:32, 20 May 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Anahit Manasyan met on May 20 with a delegation led by Ambassador Janez Lenarčič, head of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights observation mission in Armenia.

Welcoming the delegation, the Human Rights Defender presented the mandate and key methodologies of the Ombudsman’s Office in the context of electoral processes.

Manasyan addressed a range of issues related to the protection of human rights during elections, particularly unacceptable and aggressive rhetoric used during election campaigns, as well as discriminatory and stigmatising speech, stressing their negative impact on both the public environment and the broader system of human rights protection and promotion.

She emphasised that legal accountability mechanisms in the context of electoral processes must be applied consistently and without selectivity, while state institutions should pursue more sensitive public communication during election campaigns.

The Human Rights Defender also raised concerns over the extensive use of detention as a preventive measure in Armenia, as well as troubling cases of suicides and self-harm in closed institutions, underlining the need for systemic reforms in these areas.

The sides also discussed ensuring the full participation of persons with disabilities in electoral processes, touching upon both the progress achieved and the existing challenges in the field.

At the end of the meeting, the parties reaffirmed their readiness to continue cooperation on issues related to the protection and promotion of human rights.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Armenpress: Three Armenian Startups Selected to Participate in Europe’s Leadin

High Technologies21:58, 20 May 2026
Read the article in: ArabicՀայերենRusskiyTürkçe中文

Three Armenian startup companies are set to travel to Paris to take part in VivaTech 2026, one of Europe’s largest technology and innovation events, according to the European Union Office in Armenia.

Denovo Sciences, TACTUN and MedPair have been selected under the EU4Innovation East programme to represent Armenia at the event.

The EU office said the initiative aims to create new opportunities for innovators across the Eastern Partnership countries, including Armenia, by building stronger links between Armenian talent and European investors, partners and markets.

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Pro-Kremlin actors launch large scale disinformation campaign targeting Armeni

Euronews
May 20 2026
By Noa Schumann & Tamsin Paternoster

For several months, Armenia has been the target of a wide-ranging Russian disinformation campaign ahead of its parliamentary elections in early June. Researchers say the operation is among the most extensive in recent years. The Cube examines how and why false claims have been circulating.

A large-scale pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign is targeting Armenia ahead of its parliamentary elections on 7 June, researchers say.

In total, 343 fake videos were published by early May, prompting analysts to describe the operation as one of the most extensive in recent years — second only to the campaign observed during Moldova’s 2025 election.

According to researchers, the campaign began in early March and was part of “Matryoshka” — a pro-Kremlin disinformation operation that has increasingly used artificial intelligence.

Among the fabricated videos, a central narrative claims that a victory for Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, whose campaign focuses on a pro-European direction, could trigger a war between Armenia and Russia.

The collective Antibot4Navalny, which studies bot networks, said it had identified more than a dozen fake videos featuring Pashinyan and French President Emmanuel Macron, which repeatedly promote the false claim that the two leaders struck a “secret deal”: French backing in the election in exchange for Armenia launching a war against Russia after a victory.

On 11 May, one video falsely claimed that Pashinyan’s press secretary had confirmed the presence of NATO instructors in Armenia, and that, following the parliamentary elections, he would “provoke a military conflict with Russia.”

However, fabricated media reports are not the only tool used in this disinformation campaign. Researchers say bots are also spreading false claims on social media platforms such as X in an apparent effort to undermine Pashinyan.

No evidence supports these allegations. It is also worth noting that, although some of these posts garnered tens of thousands of views, researchers say the figures were artificially inflated.

The aim of the campaign

The election campaign has unfolded against a backdrop of growing cooperation between the EU and Armenia, highlighted by the first EU–Armenia summit held in the country in early May.

Several senior European figures attended, including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, European Council President António Costa, and France’s President Macron.

The meeting was marked by a shared commitment from both sides to strengthen bilateral relations.

“Today’s EU–Armenia summit sends a clear signal of the EU’s firm commitment to deepen our relations with Armenia, and to strengthen cooperation across many new areas, bringing Armenia and its people closer to the European Union,” Costa said.

During the summit, Pashinyan said Armenia was entering “a new period of peace, of consolidation of a democratic regime, and this really, certainly creates a good environment for the development of our bilateral relations.”

Two months after the campaign began — and just days after the summit — Russian President Vladimir Putin drew a comparison between Armenia and Ukraine during a press conference in Moscow on Victory Day, warning that Armenia could face similar consequences if it pursued closer integration with the EU.

“We are all currently feeling the consequences of the situation in Ukraine. How did it all begin? With Ukraine’s accession — or rather attempted accession — to the EU. That was the first step, the very first,” Putin said.

He added that subsequent developments — including political upheaval and conflict — stemmed from that initial move, calling it “a serious problem”.

On 26 March 2025, the Armenian parliament voted by a large majority to launch a process towards EU accession, in a move backed by Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party.

Moscow, however, has repeatedly accused Western actors of interference. As early as January, Russia claimed the EU was encouraging the Armenian government to rig the parliamentary elections.

On 20 January, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said financial support pledged by the EU’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, to Armenia amounted to a “sincere” confession and an “admission of guilt”.

Those claims echo accusations made during Moldova’s recent elections, which were ultimately won by pro-European forces.

Matryoshka and Storm 1516

Alongside the Matryoshka campaign targeting the election, another pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign, known as Storm-1516, is also spreading false narratives targeting Pashinyan on social media, according to researchers from the South Carolina-based Clemson University’s Media Forensics.

Germany’s foreign intelligence agency, the BND, and France’s Viginum agency, a government body monitoring disinformation campaigns, describe Storm-1516 as a Russian information manipulation network that used coordinated disinformation campaigns with the aim of destabilising democratic institutions.

According to Clemson’s research, the campaign has been active since January and spread false claims about Pashinyan’s election promises, in addition to allegations that Pashinyan used $11 million (€9.5 million) in funds from the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), earmarked for digitalisation, to covertly finance his campaign.

According to Ella Murray, a digital influence analyst at Clemson, Storm-1516’s methods in the Armenian campaign show they are evolving.

“Particularly, they have expanded their stable of influencer networks and fake marketing bots,” she said. “Additionally, they have started using accounts purporting to be local and country-specific.”

“Russian campaigns are targeting Armenia for the same reasons they interfered in elections in Moldova and Hungary,” Murray continued. “They want to discredit pro-Western candidates and reassert regional influence.”

Verelq: Narek Karapetyan hid the part of having foreign citizenship

The deputy candidate of the “Strong Armenia” alliance hid the information about his foreign citizenship, which prevents him from obtaining the status of an official. This is reported by the prosecutor’s office.

“According to the report of an apparent crime received from the police of the RA Ministry of Internal Affairs in the investigative department of the RA Investigative Committee of the Republic of Armenia, N.K., the deputy candidate nominated by the “Strong Armenia” alliance as the number one candidate in the regular RA NA elections on June 7, 2026, having been warned about the responsibility defined by the law in case of providing false information, intentionally hid the information about having or having foreign citizenship, that is, the Ministry of Internal Affairs is a migration and citizenship service. submitted a false application with the content of not being a citizen of another state, thus concealing it information on having foreign citizenship, which prevents the acquisition of the status of an official.

On the basis of the report, criminal proceedings were initiated in the investigative department of the RA Investigative Committee of the city of Yerevan under Article 449, Part 1 of the Criminal Code (concealing information that hinders obtaining or maintaining the status of an official).

A preliminary investigation is being conducted,” the message reads.

To remind, Narek Karapetyan is listed as a citizen of the Russian Federation in the extract obtained from the State Register of Legal Entities of the Russian Federation. According to Medianews, the document refers to “Mospromexplotatsia” LLC, in which he has a 2.5% share. The data was entered in the registry on August 18, 2020.

Narek Karapetyan continues to insist that he is only a citizen of the Republic of Armenia

“Our way” movement coordinator Narek Karapetyan writes.


“Pashinyan, who finally lost his self-control, who was pulling women on the street that day, realized that his true face was revealed to the people.


His team, who knew about his mental state before us, in order to distract the situation, started spreading fake news for us to deny, and to distract people for two days.


Karapetyan Narek should not have another citizenship. Narek should only be a citizen of Armenia. 


Pashinyan diverted the people from his madness.


Changes are coming.”

“Ararat Cement” will be nationalized. Pashinyan’s statement in Shnogh

As the Zangezur copper-molybdenum combine came under state control in 2021, the same fate awaits the “Ararat Cement” factory, according to Nikol Pashinyan. The Prime Minister candidate of the “Civil Agreement” party announced this today during a meeting with the residents of the Shnogh community of Lori marz.


According to Pashinyan, one of the key assets of PAP leader Gagik Tsarukyan’s business, “Ararat Cement”, will soon come under the control of the state and become the property of the Republic of Armenia. He announced that, according to his claim, “mafia schemes” related to Gagik Tsarukyan and his son-in-law, the former governor of Kotayk Karapet Guloyan, were revealed, and the government has already received the letter from the prosecutor’s office, according to which the said property is subject to nationalization.


The prime minister’s candidate also mentioned that, as it happened in the case of HEC, it is planned to appoint a temporary manager in “Ararat Cement”.


Addressing the employees of the factory, Pashinyan announced that they are no longer obliged to obey the instructions of Gagik Tsarukyan or Karapet Guloyan, because, according to him, the Republic of Armenia will be their employer from now on. He also called upon the employees to be guided by the government’s instructions from now on.

Pope Leo adds Armenian Orthodox saint to Roman calendar

Aleteia
May 20 2026
Philip Kosloski – published on 05/20/26
St. Nerses the Gracious, a saint of the Armenian Orthodox Church, was inserted into the Roman Martyrology, a move that is being called “ecumenism of the saints.”

During the past 30 years, various popes have decided to include Orthodox saints in the Roman Martyrology. The martyrology is a list of all the officially recognized saints in the Roman Catholic Church.

For example, St. John Paul II included a few Orthodox saints when the Roman Martyrology was revised in 2004, and Pope Francis added St. Gregory of Narek and St. Isaac of Nineveh to the list of saints, as well as the 21 Coptic Martyrs of Libya — the group killed in 2015 by ISIS.

Most recently, Pope Leo XIV chose to include St. Nerses the Gracious in the Roman Martyrology. This was done to coincide with Pope Leo’s meeting with His Holiness Aram I, Catholicos of Cilicia, on May 18.

Of course, the earliest saints of the Orthodox Churches are the same as those of the Catholic Church, as the saints of the first centuries came before the various schisms between East and West.

Reconciliation between churches

The Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity released a statement that helps explain why St. Nerses is believed to be a saint and why his example matters in the 21st century:

Nerses Shnorhali (1102 – August 13, 1173), Catholicos of Armenia from 1166 to 1173, is recognized and venerated by the Armenian tradition as one of its greatest saints. Remembered as a pastor, theologian, poet, hymn writer, and forerunner of modern ecumenism, he received the title “Shnorhali” [“the Gracious” ed.] from his contemporaries for the irenic nature of his writings.

Furthermore, the Dicastery highlighted his example of ecumenism:

During his ministry as bishop and Catholicos, he worked for reconciliation among the Churches, especially between the Armenian Church and the Byzantine Orthodox Church. His hymns are part of the Armenian liturgy—both Apostolic and Catholic—and numerous churches are dedicated to him.

His name will be included on August 13, the date of his death in 1173.

It is hoped that this gesture will continue to build bridges between the Catholic Church and Orthodox Churches, recognizing men and women of heroic virtue who share a desire that one day all Christians will be united under one Church.

Stepan Zoryan’s house-museum has something new

From now on, the visitors of Stepan Zoryan’s House-Museum can watch the “Lonely Tree” animation using an optical tag (QR code).

With the ARLOOPA app, the painting “The Lonely Tree” was brought to life, becoming a living story. Using modern technology, the lines of Kojoyan’s canvas begin to move, the tree breathes, creating a living dialogue between the past and the future.


The lonely tree had great advice for Zoryan. “Perhaps it is possible to compare our people as well – No matter how difficult their conditions are, they always strive upwards, towards light, towards freedom…

“The picture still decorates my room,” Zoryan writes.


Today, the house-museum speaks to the past, preserves the present, and builds the culture of the future.

From June 1, a new system for confirming the supply of goods will operate in Russia

The State Revenue Committee informs participants of foreign economic activities, in particular, exporters, about the launch of new regulations in the Russian Federation, the SPOT system, effective from June 1, 2026.


1. What is changing for RA exporters?


From June 1, 2026, the system of confirmation of the expectation of delivery of goods (СПОТ-СпоТ-Система спечатьения отчения поставки товаров) will be fully operational in the Russian Federation. The system refers to the circulation of goods imported from EAEU member states, including the Republic of Armenia, by road transport of the Russian Federation.


Although the Russian importer (applicant) is officially responsible for SPOT, the system will also directly affect the exporters of goods from RA to RF, because without the QR code formed on the basis of the delivery expectation document formed in RF, the goods cannot be physically imported into RF territory.


2. System participants


The SPOT system distinguishes the following groups of participants:


Applicants (заявители) — are the entities of the Russian Federation who prepare and submit a document (ДОПП) in advance. In essence, they are Russian partner organizations and individual entrepreneurs who import goods from other EAEU countries (including RA) to Russia.


Carriers (перевозчики) — those that carry out the transportation of goods from other EAEU countries to the Russian Federation. RA exporters (carriers) are also included in this category.


The Tax Authority of the Russian Federation will act as the SPOT operator, and the Customs Authority of the Russian Federation will act as the controlling authority.


3. Which products does SPOT cover?


The system is applied to goods imported from EAEU member states to Russia by road transport. In the future, the Government of the Russian Federation may extend the application of the order to transportation by other types of transport. SPOT does not apply to the following categories:


cash,


oil,


electricity,


goods for personal use of individuals.


4. How will the system work?


As a general rule, the applicant (the Russian partner) must:


No later than 2 calendar days before the import of the goods, form a DOPP — an electronic document that confirms the intention to accept the goods.


Not later than 2 calendar days before the import of goods, make a non-cash security payment in rubles, the amount of which should not be less than the amount of indirect taxes to be paid.


Get the visible link (QR-code) attributed to DOPP and send it to the supplier or carrier (in the case of RA, to the RA exporter or freight forwarder).


If the entire volume of goods specified in the DOPP was not imported during one shipment, then in this case the RF counterparty must submit a new DOPP for the remaining quantity of goods and also transfer a new QR code to the exporter/transporter.


5. Practical advice to RA exporters


Although it is the responsibility of the RF importer to form the DOPP and pay the security fee, there are still a number of practical considerations for the RA exporter that must be taken into account in order to adapt to the new regime.


Revision of the delivery schedule. considering that DOPP should be formed at least 2 days before import, shipment planning should be more predictable. Rush deliveries can become problematic. It is recommended to discuss the new order with Russian partners (buyers) before June 1, 2026.


Exchange of information with the Russian partner. the exporter must timely and accurately provide all information about the product (product name, quantity, value, etc.) so that the Russian importer can correctly form the DOPP.


Receiving a QR code before reaching the Russian border. The carrier must have the QR-code before approaching the RF border, so the exporter must obtain it from the importer and transfer it to the carrier. Without a QR code, it will not be possible to transport the product to the territory of the Russian Federation.


Regulation of relations with the carrier. it is advisable to include clauses in transport contracts that will regulate the liability of the parties for losses arising in the absence of DOPP or incorrect data.