Gold Surges to $4,676 as Turkey Dumps 120 Tons of Gold


How to Vet an Auto Transport Company Before Signing Any Contract


International Lawyers Warn European Commission Over Interference in Armenian D


Armenian Assembly Of America To Honor Longtime Leaders And Staff At Celebratio


It’s No Lie. It’s Triple-cross


City of Glendale’s 25th Annual Armenian Genocide Commemorative Event




Armenian Cultural Renaissance In the Ottoman Empire


CC: Pasadena mechanic turns scrap metal into art


168: Change the default selection rule. time works in favor of power

April 10, 2026


With the hasty amendment made by the National Assembly in the “Electoral Code”, the parties were forbidden to use names and personal names when participating in the elections. It is clear that this was done to prevent the registration of the electoral bloc named after Samvel Karapetyan. As always, the political field mostly reacted with more sharp humor, sarcasm, imaginings of new bans by Nikol Pashinyan…

But what happened should not be a joke, but a cause for deep concern for most humorists. This legislative change, testifying to the total lack of democracy in Armenia, means that Nikol Pashinyan does not care about any legal, democratic structure and will deal with the results of the elections in the same way as he dealt with the “Electoral Code” two days ago, to suit his political interest. The formation of the next government in Armenia will not be influenced by sociological polls, nor by the activity of people at the polling station, nor by the abundance of votes received by the opposition and by the CP.

The outcome of the elections will be determined by one factor: the degree of manageability of the vertical system of power by Nikol Pashinyan. Even up to today, that indicator is close to one hundred percent.

Moreover, the loyalty of the government and state systems is built on the principle “without Nikol, everyone’s destruction”. The effectiveness of the latter, that is, Pashinyan’s ability to manage the system, increases with the hardening of the opposition’s rhetoric. the more the opposition makes verbal threats, the more the instinct of the state administration system and law enforcement officers to devote themselves more selflessly to the reproduction of the government operating for self-preservation.

Read also

  • The courtship ends. what price will Armenia pay?
  • “Boris Navasardyan, Ruben Babayan and company”, when you arrive in Baku, will you ask questions about this? Naira Zohrabyan
  • Should Hayk Sargsyan apologize to Suren Papikyan? Why didn’t Papikyan and Pashinyan address the targeting of positions and command?

Nikol Pashinyan needs the total manageability of the vertical state system not only and perhaps not so much to satisfy his own despotism, but to ensure the reproduction of power. And while the opposition presents the amendment of the “Electoral Code” as a manifestation of Pashinyan’s fears (it’s not that Pashinyan is not afraid), he shows with this next step that he controls the political and state systems, all decision-making institutions to such an extent that after the elections, regardless of the results of the elections, he can even pass a new law through the still functioning National Assembly, by which he will declare himself Armenia forever. manager.

The West, within the framework of the fight against “hybrid war”, will applaud this, declaring that Armenia has turned from a bastion of democracy into a newly discovered continent of democracy. And Russia will “respect the election of the friendly Armenian people” with the calculation of calling the newly elected Pashinyan to Moscow once again at a convenient moment and establishing itself on him.

The opposition has very little time and less opportunity to change this status quo, which is getting stronger every day. It should lead to a change in the atmosphere of conducting the elections according to Pashinyan’s game rules and imposing a new rule. At this point, and with today’s toolkit from the opposition, that seems ridiculously impossible.

The erasure of historical memory cannot be caused by short-term politics

April 10, 2026

A letter regarding the forced resignation of Gzoyan, director of HCTI

April 9, 2026

Committee on Academic Freedom

Armenia:

N.G. Nikol Pashinyan

Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia

Your Excellency,

We are writing to you on behalf of the Committee on Academic Freedom of the Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA) to express our concern regarding reports of the forced resignation of Dr. Edita Gzoyan, director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute Foundation (AGMIF).

We urge his immediate reinstatement and demand that your office guarantee the academic integrity of the institute.

MESA was founded in 1966 with the goal of promoting scholarly research and teaching on the Middle East and North Africa. As a leading organization in the field, MESA publishes the “International Journal of Middle East Studies” and has around 2,800 members worldwide. MESA is committed to promoting academic freedom and freedom of expression both in the region and in the context of research in the region in North America and elsewhere.

Dr. Gzoyan, who was elected to his position in 2024 by the HCTI Board of Trustees, has played a key leadership role in promoting new scholarly work on the Armenian Genocide, modernizing the museum, and integrating young Armenian scholars into the global community of Genocide scholars.

His own scientific works on the transportation of children during the Armenian Genocide were published in leading European and American periodicals. He drew positive international attention to HCTI.

Therefore, we are concerned about press releases and communications with Armenian colleagues, according to which Dr. Gzoyan was forced to resign on February 10, 2026, after the official visit of US Vice President JD Vance to HCTI.

During that visit, he presented several of the Institute’s publications, including a paper on early 20th-century American press coverage of massacres and attacks against Transcaucasian Armenians that mention Nagorno-Karabakh, and accompanied Mr. Vance and his wife, Usha Bala Vance, to the museum and Armenian Genocide Memorial.

During the press conference on March 12, 2026, you mentioned that you demanded his resignation due to the inclusion of the Institute’s books on Nagorno Karabakh, calling those books “provocative” and contrary to Armenia’s foreign policy. Then, you bypassed the established procedure and appointed one of your staff members to the position of director, and replaced the members of the independent board of trustees with political allies.

We understand that Armenia is in a difficult and difficult situation, striving to end the multi-year conflict with Azerbaijan and reach a normalization of relations. However, erasure of historical memory cannot be caused by short-term political needs.

One of the goals of the establishment of HCTI was to confront the denial of the Armenian Genocide.

Protecting the academic freedom of scientists associated with one of the world’s leading research institutions and an important scientific resource dedicated to the study of the history and memory of the Armenians of the Ottoman Empire, HCTI, is essential.

We ask you to immediately restore Dr. Gzoyan to his position.

We urge the Government of Armenia to act quickly to remedy what appears to be an unjustified interference with scientific independence, and to restore the confidence of the international academic community in the institutional integrity of HCTI and Armenia’s commitment to academic freedom and fundamental human rights.

Հարգանքներով՝

Osama Makdisi

President of MESA

Professor, University of California, Berkeley

Judith E. Tucker

Chairman of the Committee on Academic Freedom

Professor Emeritus, Georgetown University

Պատճենը՝

Zhanna Andreasyan, RA Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports

Anahit Manasyan, RA Human Rights Defender

Michael O’Flaherty, Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights

International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS)