People’s Party Leader To Run For President In 2008

PEOPLE’S PARTY LEADER TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008

arminfo
2007-08-20 14:12:00

People’s Party Leader Tigran Karapetyan told ArmInfo he will
undoubtedly run for president in 2008.

T. Karapetyan said he does not participate in the current opposition
negotiations and thinks such meetings ‘a chance not to fall out of the
game. The opposition will fail to unite and nominate a single-whole
candidate for president again.’ He also added that the People’s
Party Congress to be held in September will officially announce
his nomination for president. As regards his previous activities,
T. Karapetyan told ArmInfo that he has taken to Lake Sevan some
24,000 people from regions and Yerevan free of charge this summer. The
summer humanitarian action will over in several days due to the fall
of temperature,’ he explained.

From the Margins: Seeking a more balanced view

Glendale News Press, CA
Aug 18 2007

FROM THE MARGINS:
Seeking a more balanced view

by PATRICK AZADIAN

Sometimes it’s interesting to read an individual’s interpretation of
my column. On the rare occasion when a reader chooses to refer to my
surname and attribute inaccurate conclusions back to it, I face a
dilemma.

Do I answer, or do I turn the other cheek? I often choose the latter.

There is a risk in this approach. And that is that another reader may
only read the reply, and therefore attribute the interpretations back
to me. No one wants to be stuck with this.

Recently, I read a backhanded compliment about my `thoughtful column’
regarding the Sandoval family tragedy.

In the column, I stated: `Referring to owners of certain model cars
has sometimes been used to describe a segment of our city’s
population.’ At least one person interpreted this as a bi-product of
a chip on the shoulder.

Apparently, not having a chip on the shoulder requires standing
silent when the mudslinging continues. Of course, with the help of a
bunch of nouveau riche, arrogant young drivers, this campaign seems
to always have fuel. It’s a shame.

But why refer to the car model or the unshaven face of the drivers if
race and ethnicity aren’t the target? Is the behavior negative or the
ethnicity?

Of course, if this `chip on the shoulder’ label is successfully
attributed to my column, this discredits the message. This reverse
psychology can work on people with an inferiority or superiority
complex about their ancestry. I have neither.

My experience with the Armenian-American community (as well as
others) is generally positive; I shouldn’t be ashamed to admit it. My
experience is also more substantive than a few whose pastime is to
see the glass as half-empty.

My family members are hard-working people who feel privileged to
pursue the American dream. The circle of my friends – non-Armenian
and Armenian – is no different. They are hard-working, intelligent
people. More importantly, they are family people; they are
responsible fathers and caring mothers; they teach their children the
value of hard work, education and tolerance. That is my experience. I
respect and love my family and my friends. Is my experience
all-encompassing? No. But, neither are shallow generalizations.

It wouldn’t be right for me to stereotype any segment of our city to
gain brownie points.

Are there problems in the Armenian community? Yes. I pride myself in
being one of the few writers who’s written about domestic violence,
divorce and suicide, and I have offered solutions.

I’ve done this knowing full well that a few would use this to feed
stereotypes.

But what community is free of issues? I should stress that by putting
things in context, I’m not making excuses. Context is important, and
selective criticism is not just.

Regardless, one community may have a higher number of serial killers,
and another may have a higher percentage of gang violence.

But if I meet a person from these communities, I treat the person as
an individual. I won’t be redundant, but in the column in question,
one of my main points was the responsibility of ethnic organizations,
TV stations and the church in addressing problems; I also singled out
parents for their obligation to keep their kids in check.

A few people ignored this paragraph.

On one occasion, I was referred to as an `Armenian writer.’ I am a
writer, period. I write about non-Armenians and Armenians. But, there
is a large presence of residents with Armenian ancestry in this city.
It’s natural that my column will reflect this.

If I can be labeled as an `Armenian writer,’ then the substance of
what I say becomes irrelevant, and my master status becomes `the
Armenian’ – not a writer, not an American, not someone who cares, but
`the Armenian.’

This was a clever effort to discredit my message, but people know
better.

I have no doubt that a great majority of residents welcome a balanced
and less adversarial approach to issues. Yes, we should not be afraid
to talk about problems, but we should also have the capacity to
distinguish between healthy criticism in good faith and a smear
campaign.

 PATRICK AZADIAN is a writer and the creative director of a
local marketing and graphic design studio living in Glendale. He may
be reached at respond@ fromthemargins.net.

Europe and We

Hayots Ashkharh, Armenia
Aug 18 2007

EUROPE AND WE

Armenia’s integration to European processes in the recent years
has reached a refuge when the bilateral relations and the political,
economic, and religious-cultural relations with Europe has become a
topic of common discussion and needs a pithy observation.

The main reason of such a demand are the restrictions in these
relations, that are usually heard in the Parliamentary Assembly of
the Council of Europe as well as during the regular visits of the
representatives of European structures to Armenia. Our perception of
the European structures as dictating and obliging bodies has become
so deeply rooted that it has turn into an unwritten law for us. But
if we can’t distinguish Strasburg from the former Soviet center, then
why should the Europeans distinguish Armenia from our direct
neighbors. After all to recognize the people close to them in the
sense of civilization, Europe has to be confident that we Armenians
are loyal to those traditions.
Whereas sometimes it looks as if the process of Armenia’s
integration to the European structures is not a strategic priority
but an obligatory – volunteer event to which we participate just to
be far from trouble.
As a result a situation is created in Armenia-Europe relations
that doesn’t match neither with the history of the bilateral
relations nor with the concrete matter of wide opportunities in
separate spheres.
It is obvious that by now neither Armenia managed to introduce
itself to Europe with its real face – European civilization, nor has
Europe deeply perceived us like that. This is the reason why by now
the advantage of Armenia, in essence the only Republic in the region
that has apparent European cultural priority towards its neighbors is
not yet manifested.
If we really want to become an accomplished European country and
benefit from all the opportunities created in the region we should
swiftly overcome the policy of being guided by inertia. Moreover the
different European structures in Armenia must be overflowed with the
proposals of cooperation made by Armenia.
The same is about our passive attitude towards the intentions of
different European institutions to have representations in the
region. Armenia must try to rouse interest for these institutions,
the bearers of new governing experience that have different skills to
build a modern state.
At present Europe is far not the regular conqueror entering the
region. Being a complex system of democratic countries and
institutions, the European family creates a huge domain for mutual
cooperation. To benefit from this opportunity we should perceive
Europe as an environment consisting of cordial countries, with which
we have if not common roots at least common edges beginning from our
cultural and religious heritage to economy and politics.
All this contributes to mutual understanding and creates
opportunities for mutually beneficial cooperation.

KAREN NAHAPETYAN

Armenia Warns Against Incautious Politicization Of Nagorno-Karabakh

ARMENIA WARNS AGAINST INCAUTIOUS POLITICIZATION OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH ISSUE

Armenpress
Aug 17 2007

YEREVAN, AUGUST 17, ARMENPRESS: Armenia’s permanent representative
to the UN, Armen Martirosian, said those countries which are well
aware of the South Caucasian region and the true cause behind the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict find that an incautious politicization of
this conflict may jeopardize the entire peace process.

In response to Armenpress request to comment on a motion submitted
to the UN General Assembly’s 62-nd session by members of the GUAM
organization (Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova) demanding
debates on the so-called frozen post-Soviet conflicts, Armen
Martirosian said representatives of the USA and France whom he met
lately have reconfirmed their decision to back a draft resolution
that would be acceptable to Armenia.

According to Armenian diplomat, GUAM member countries themselves seem
to have lost their original zeal to push for discussion of their draft
resolution, ‘but since the draft resolution has been incorporated into
the General Assembly’s agenda they want to develop this issue, but the
majority of UN member countries question the wisdom of this motion."

He said Armenian diplomats are working with UN and GUAM members in an
effort to find a reciprocally acceptable solution. He said the motion
was not yet officially put into circulation, not counting four-five
working options, none of which is acceptable to Armenia and the OSCE
Minsk Group member countries.

Armenian Army Abuses Go Unchecked

Institute for War and Peace Reporting

Armenian Army Abuses Go Unchecked
Defence minister pledges to clean up poor practice, but conscripts say
corruption and violence are still rife.
By Gegham Vardanian in Yerevan (CRS No. 406 17-Aug-07)

Arsen Karapetian served in the Armenian army for just over a year
before he fell gravely ill and his parents bought him out in exchange
for a bribe.

Karapetian recalled the incident which led to his illness. "It was
early spring. Early in the morning, we were woken by an alarm call and
they marched us out of the base. There was a heavy downpour and we
were soaked to the skin within five minutes.’

The soldiers returned to base and hung out their wet uniforms to dry,
but their company commander ordered them to get dressed and go for a
theory lesson. `We had to put on our wet clothes again and spend an
hour and a half in a cold hall," he said.

Karapetian and more than a dozen other soldiers subsequently
contracted pneumonia, which in his case developed into pleurisy. Some
of them were kept at the base for two weeks before being taken to
hospital.

"I grew terribly thin,’ he said. `Fluid was pumped from my lungs every
day. I was supposed to be demobilised but they kept on postponing
it. In the end, my parents gave a bribe of 500 [US] dollars to the
`right’ officers to speed up my demobilisation."

On returning to civilian life, Arsen was registered as a disabled
person.

The military has not taken any action against the officer involved in
the incident.

The often appalling treatment meted out to conscript soldiers during
their two years of military service is widely known about, but is
still off-limits as subject for public debate. According to the
Armenian Helsinki Committee, which monitors human rights in the armed
forces, "The number of crimes is not getting any less, because the
culture of permissiveness and impunity still prevails."

The head of the committee, Avetik Ishkhanian, believes there is an
unwritten law that you cannot speak out publicly about abuses in the
army.

"Soldiers are afraid of speaking the truth while they are serving,’ he
said. `They avoid doing so after demobilisation too, and just try to
forget the years they spent in the army."

According to Zhanna Aleksanian, a journalist and human rights activist
who has extensively researched abuses in the military, "Bribery is
commonplace in the army. Beatings and violence meted out by officers
are not even discussed. Parents prefer to remain silent on this issue,
as they do not want to harm their sons even more."

Armenian defence minister Mikael Harutiunian insisted that the
military was tough on disciplining its commissioned officers.

`If officers are guilty and if they have committed a crime, they are
punished," he told IWPR. `Many officers have been dismissed and
prosecuted. Guilty officers are always punished.’

However, according to the Armenian prosecutor general’s office, of the
46 convictions of military officers last year, only one involved
mistreatment of a soldier, and three were for taking bribes.

Many experts say that instances of abuse are often covered up.

Lawyer and member of parliament Zaruhi Postanjian said that in cases
where soldiers are injured when the officer who ought to be on duty is
absent from his post, no legal action is taken.

Before she was elected to parliament, Postanjian worked for many years
to protect the rights of young soldiers from the rough rules of the
army’s unwritten code. She points to the informal system of `unit
overseers’ -men who impose order among their comrades and wield
enormous power over junior conscripts.

Aleksanian explained how the system worked. "This ‘unit overseer’, a
soldier or a sergeant, is usually chosen by the officer in command,
and he enjoys certain privileges. Commanders manage their units
through these overseers – it’s easier for them that way. They can
easily call the overseer to order. The soldiers fear and respect him
and he decides everything and punishes those who don’t obey."

She noted that the existence of these unofficial enforcers is now
taken as a matter of fact. `The unit overseers… are often cited in
court cases. That makes it sort of official,’ she said.

A conscript can pay off the network of platoon and battalion
commanding officers, `unit overseers’ and their associates known as
the `good lads’ to win privileges, such as extended leave.

A recently demobilised soldier, Vahe Nikoghosian, said he took leave
several times and paid a bribe of around 15 US dollars a day to the
officer. After returning from leave, soldiers then have to bring gifts
– money, food, cigarettes, and, these days, mobile phone credit cards
– to the overseer and his `lads’ who made it possible.

Nikoghosian argues that the overseers play a useful role. `Without
them, the soldiers would be constantly fighting each other,’ he
said. `In our unit, the overseer usually resolved arguments fairly,
and someone who had been insulted could always appeal to him.’

He said his parents constantly paid out bribes to make his army life
easier. `They were always sending me food and clothes. When they came
to see me, they’d always invite the officers to a restaurant. On three
occasions, they gave me money to pay officers so I could take leave.’

The defence minister says the officer class cannot be wholly blamed if
illegal practices occur in the units under their command.

"It depends not just on the officers but also on the quality of
soldiers coming into the army, what kind of upbringing they’ve had,
where they grew up and which town of village they lived in before
joining up,’ Harutiunian told IWPR. `The army can’t call up only the
well-disciplined and the properly brought-up."

He promised that "we will do all we can to reduce the number of
negative incidents in the army. Of course, they won’t disappear 100
per cent, but we have to work even harder."

Paying the right money or having the right contacts can ensure you are
assigned to an easier posting.

"Parents pay at least 500 dollars to prevent their sons being sent to
a regiment far away on the border," said Postanjian.

The ex-soldier Nikoghosian confirmed this from his own experience,
saying, "Before I was drafted, they [parents] found an acquaintance
who handed over a bribe of 700 dollars so that I would not be sent me
to a regiment posted in a remote location.’

The Helsinki Committee reports that there are `VIP units’ based close
to the capital Yerevan, which take the sons of government officials,
or anyone willing to hand over between 3,000 and 5,000 dollars.

After IWPR contacted Harutiunian, he ordered the head of the defence
ministry’s personnel department, General Vardan Avetisian, to provide
an interview. But in a telephone conversation, Avetisian categorically
refused to be interviewed about corruption or other abuses.

`The army is a closed-in, armoured, invulnerable structure surrounded
by an iron curtain,’ said Aleksanian. `Of course, hazing may disappear
one day but I cannot see any progress towards making that happen."

(Arsen Karapetian and Vahe Nikoghosian are not the real names of the
soldiers interviewed for this report.)

Gegham Vardanian is a correspondent with Internews in Yerevan.

Mia Farrow Leads Torch Relay Through Countries That Have Suffered Ge

MIA FARROW LEADS TORCH RELAY THROUGH COUNTRIES THAT HAVE SUFFERED GENOCIDE

By The Canadian Press
The Chronicle Journal, Canada
Aug 15 2007

American actress, Mia Farrow, left, weeps next to a Rwandan girl and
Sudanese genocide survivor at the Nyanza Genocide Memorial Site in
Kigali, Rwanda, Wednesday. (AP/Andrew McGregor)

KIGALI, Rwanda (AP) – Mia Farrow joined genocide survivors in a
torch-lighting ceremony Wednesday at a Rwandan school where thousands
died in a 100-day frenzy of killings in 1994.

The 62-year-old actress, whose screen credits include "Rosemary’s Baby"
and "The Purple Rose of Cairo," is leading an Olympic-style torch relay
through countries that have suffered genocide to press China, host of
the 2008 games, to help end abuses in its ally Sudan’s Darfur region.

More than 200,000 people have died and 2.5 million been chased from
their homes in Darfur since 2003, when tribes of ethnic African
farmers rebelled against the Arab-dominated central government,
accusing it of neglect and discrimination.

"We welcome China’s recent UN vote to allow a peacekeeping force into
Sudan," said Jill Savitt, director of Dream for Darfur, the group
that organized the ceremony. "However, China now must continue to
press Sudan to ensure that the words on paper translate into action.

That means adequate and verifiable security on the ground in Darfur."

The UN Security Council has authorized a joint UN-African Union
operation of 20,000 peacekeepers and 6,000 civilian police for
Darfur. Sudan at first resisted the proposal, but backed down. The
new force will absorb a 7,000-member African peacekeeping force now
in Darfur, and was to be in place by year’s end.

The school where Farrow appeared Wednesday is Ecole Technique
Officielle, where 2,000 Rwandans were executed during the country’s
genocide.

The killing started within hours after the president’s plane was
mysteriously shot down over Kigali late on April 6, 1994. Hutu
militiamen, known as interahamwe, set up roadblocks across Kigali
and on April 7 began hunting down Tutsis and moderate Hutus and
killing them.

The Darfur torch relay will also go to Armenia, Bosnia, Germany,
Cambodia and finally in December to Hong Kong.

Boxing: Arthur Abraham Defends His Title Against Khoren Gevor

ARTHUR ABRAHAM DEFENDS HIS TITLE AGAINST KHOREN GEVOR
By Roger T. Tubajiki-August 16, 2007

ringsidereport.com, VA
Aug 15 2007

On August 18, at the Max Schmeling Halle in Berlin, Germany,
fellow Armenian middleweight fighters meet in the ring. Current
IBF Middleweight Champion Arthur Abraham, 23-0, 18 KO’s, defends
his title against Khoren Gevor, 27-2, 15 KO’s, the IBF #5 ranked
mandatory challenger.

Although it appears that many are familiar with Arthur Abraham
and consider him as the favorite, Gevor and his trainer, Fritz
Sdunik, praise their efforts to be in the position to go for the IBF
Middleweight title. In Gevor’s opinion this is a great opportunity
is a long-ago dream.

Gevor boxed in Armenia and at a young age, discovered his passion
for boxing and since that time, his desire to accomplish something
honorable in boxing has been haunting him. Driven by destiny, Gevor
left the land of his ancestors for Germany at the age of 16.

With a successful amateur career that earned him 6 Armenian National
Titles in 75 fights in which he won 72, Gevor turned pro in 2000,
and ever since, he has only lost two fights which were back to back
for the International German Light Middleweight Championship to the
same Lukas Konecny in 2002.

Analyzing closely previous fights of Arthur Abraham, Khoren and his
trainer,Fritz Sdunek have realized the toughness of a skilled Abraham
and also found out that, despite that, Abraham is not unbeatable, and
an intensive training preparation that will help the highly motivated
Gevor Khoren upset Arthur Abraham has been set in motion. Tune in
Saturday to find who comes out the winner….

Mon.itor.Us Enables Competitive Website Research and Promotion

PR.com (press release), NY
Aug 12 2007

Mon.itor.Us Enables Competitive Website Research and Promotion:
Everyone Can Benefit

Yerevan, Armenia, August 12, 2007 –(PR.com)– Mon.itor.Us a leading
provider of free websites and networks monitoring service empowers
its users with new competitive web performance research and promotion
tool. Mon.itor.Us Industry Benchmarks allows the community to build
and publish customized web performance reports for arbitrary selected
market segments.

Mon.itor.Us free website and server monitoring service now presents
everyone an opportunity not only to measure website performance but
also create competitive web monitoring reports on many groups of
websites. Newly added benchmarking tool allows publishing weekly
reports on websites availability and average response time. The
websites group may include competitors’, clients’ and partners’
sites, and delivers true and in-depth understanding of particular
market, industry and competitor landscape.

Mon.itor.Us Benchmarks are community created and publicly available
web pages that show statistics about various industries’
competitiveness on the web. Community members create their own
benchmarks by selecting websites for example in a particular industry
like tourism, IT services, telecommunication, transport, retail,
government, or specific niches, such as Hotels in France, Restaurants
in San Francisco, Top 10 German sites, US Grocery Stores, etc. They
may also tag the reports and make them available to other community
members via Tag Cloud navigation on the Mon.itor.Us benchmarks
directory page.

The Benchmarks reports represent unbiased view of different industry
websites performances. Mon.itor.Us members can compare and
demonstrate their websites uptime results against their competitors
and promote their web success. Users which made investments into
their web infrastructure can prove that they deliver better and
quality user experience.

Mon.itor.Us Benchmarks help to increase web traffic and ranking.
Publicly available reports contain links to original websites and
will direct visitors of those benchmarked websites, hence improving
their traffic and search engine ranking. Mon.itor.Us provides
navigation space for searching relevant benchmarks by tag words,
Industry and Country, recently added and most popular benchmarks, as
well as aggregated industry reports.

About Mon.itor.Us
Mon.itor.Us is a leading free global websites and networks monitoring
service measuring on 24×7 basis key performance indicators of
websites, web applications and network resources. The service offers
error detection, alert notification, detailed uptime and performance
reports, real time snapshot views, and web site traffic analysis. It
currently has over 10,000 users and monitors more than 51,000 sites.

Contact: Gayane Dallakyan
Sales and Marketing
Email: [email protected]
Web:
Web:

e/48344

http://mon.itor.us
http://monitis.com
http://www.pr.com/press-releas

Return to Sender: Letter from Nagasaki

Pacific Free Press, Canada
Aug 12 2007

Return to Sender: Letter from Nagasaki

Sunday, 12 August 2007
Letter from Nagasaki
by David Rovics

`Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and
order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right
of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling
international disputes.

————
In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea,
and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be
maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be
recognized.’
– Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution
————-

I met Eduardo and Lilly Zaragoza two years ago at an event I was
singing at, the annual fundraising dinner of the Albuquerque Peace
and Justice Center. Eduardo was 79 years old at the time. A short,
gentle, quiet man, he had joined the US Navy at the age of 17 and was
sent off to occupy the defeated nation of Japan. One month after the
dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki, his ship docked in the port,
beside the many melted, ruined ships that sat lifelessly in the
harbor. He and his shipmates took a walk around the annihilated city,
the vast expanse of charred and melted rubble that used to be the
city of Nagasaki. On that day, Eduardo joined the ranks of what the
Japanese call the hibakusha, radiation survivors.

His life has never been the same since. No matter how much he has
tried to forget, the nightmares of the visions he saw have never
ceased. The masses of bloated bodies floating in the water. The
horribly burned, disfigured, screaming survivors in the makeshift
hospital wards he visited. Like the rest of the hibakusha, Eduardo
was mentally scarred by what he saw. His body has also never been the
same. The symptoms of what we now know as radiation sickness began on
his first day off the ship. When I met him, he and his wife were both
struggling with cancer.

Eduardo and Lilly described to me how they had had four children,
not including the miscarriages. One was stillborn. Two others died of
the same rare disease as young adults. Their last surviving child was
suffering from cancer when I met them. Both of them came from
families with a history of longevity and no history of cancer.

Eduardo was one of many thousands of US soldiers who were
purposefully exposed to nuclear radiation. Many of the others, in
experiments easily worthy of the Nazi Dr. Mengele, were ordered to
walk through desert areas where nuclear bombs had just been exploded.
The horrifying results on their fragile human bodies were quite
predictable, just as predictable as the military’s denials of
reality.

Corbin Harney died of cancer last month at the age of 87. Untold
numbers of other hibakusha in what we now call the Southwestern
United States did not live to such a ripe old age, but Corbin was
special, he was a Western Shoshone medicine man, from a long line of
medicine men. Corbin was a veteran of World War II. Upon returning
home, his reward for his service was for his home, the Western
Shoshone Nation, to become, technically, the most bombed nation on
Earth. He was to spend most of his adult life campaigning against
nuclear testing in his homeland, the area now generally known as
Nevada.

Corbin believed in the healing power of natural hot springs, among
other things. I met him at his home, the Poo Bah ranch, in Nevada
near the California border. For decades, Corbin got up before dawn
every morning to greet the sun in a ceremony to which anybody was
invited to join. The ceremony always began with Corbin playing a drum
in front of a small fire. When people gathered with him around the
fire, on the morning I joined him, like thousands of other mornings,
he alternated between singing in his Shoshone language and speaking
in English about the importance of the different elements of life.

He spoke first about the dark, and how important that was, how
everything needs to rest, how the light comes from the dark, and how
important the dark was `in the times when we were hunted’ by the
white invaders, to hide. He spoke about the rocks, how they are all
alive, how some of the rocks are radioactive, which is fine, as long
as they are left in the ground where they belong. He spoke about the
wind, and the wind gusted. He spoke about the light, and just then,
the sun poked up above the horizon. He spoke about the rain, and in
this arid desert, for a few brief seconds, right then, the rain fell.

A few days before Corbin died on July 10th, he joked with his friends
and relatives present that he would die at 11:00. Not to anyone’s
surprise, he kept his word. After he died, his relatives saw four dog
soldiers appear from the fog outside his window to take him away. I
believe them.

I remember reading in a book how there was a brief period when the
Indians were more or less left alone, near the beginning of the 20th
century. After decades of `shoot on sight’ genocidal warfare against
the Indian nations of the west, after the lifeblood of so many
people, the buffalo, were systematically slaughtered nearly into
extinction by the Army and the settlers, after the last of the free
Indian people were driven at gunpoint onto barren reservations and
then starved to death en masse by corrupt government officials, there
was a brief time when they were allowed to try to survive on their
barren reservations. A brief period where although the buffalo were
gone, their land was stolen, their previous means of livelihood were
robbed of them, at least they were not being slaughtered by the Army.

Then on the Lakota and Navajo reservations and elsewhere, oil, coal
and uranium were discovered. For so many hundreds of thousands of
people ever since then, life has once again been a nightmare of
uranium and coal mines, back-breaking labor, poisoning of the water,
land, and air, and premature death by cancer — or by bullets, for
daring to resist the uranium-mining corporations, such as the dozens
of unsolved, uninvestigated murders of American Indian Movement
activists in the 1970’s.

I remember reading somewhere that the cancer rate on the Navajo
reservation – where there are hundreds of uranium mines, some closed,
some still functioning, all toxic wastelands – is eight times the
national average. It was sometime after that, in the early 1990’s,
after the first US invasion of Iraq, that I read another statistic,
that the cancer rate in Iraq had also risen by eight times what it
had been before the invasion. And in southern Iraq, where most of the
US artillery had been fired and bombs had fallen, so many of them
full of `depleted’ uranium, vaporizing on impact, the cancer rate was
far higher.

I write this from Japan, where I’m doing a concert tour. I was
unprepared for the extreme heat and humidity here, it’s like Houston
or New Orleans, and with climate change kicking in it’s even hotter
than usual. Seeking respite from the heat, I found myself in my air
conditioned hotel room in Hiroshima, reading Robert Fisk’s most
recent, magnificent book, The Great War for Civilization. That day I
was on the chapter about the `Gulf War’ and it’s aftermath. He didn’t
use the word, but Fisk was writing about Iraq’s hibakusha, the
innumerable children turning up at the overstretched hospital wards
of Basra with `rare’ cancers – children with leukemia (cancer of the
blood), brain cancer, young teenage girls with breast cancer. Cancers
the experienced Iraqi doctors had never seen in people so young, and
certainly in nothing like the kind of numbers they were having to
deal with at that time, and ever since then.

I arrived at Tokyo’s Narita Airport just about a month ago, and
witnessed the almost completely rebuilt megalopolis that is Tokyo,
and the seemingly unending expanse of cities surrounding it. During
the war with the US, almost every major city in Japan was bombed into
oblivion. Hundreds of thousands of children, women, senior citizens
and others were indiscriminately slaughtered from the air. A few
cities were being saved as potential A-Bomb targets, and the
beautiful city of Kyoto was the only major city to survive the war
structurally intact. After the USAF began running out of major cities
to destroy, they started bombing small cities and larger towns.
Indiscriminately bombing hospitals, schools, temples, churches,
houses, entire neighborhoods – and yes, factories, too. All this with
`conventional’ weapons.

At my first hotel room there by the airport, NHK (Japan’s equivalent
of the BBC) was delivering the news, talking at length (with English
overdubs available at the push of a button for some of the programs)
about the earthquake that had just hit northern Japan before I left
Portland, and about the nuclear reactor – the world’s largest in
terms of electrical output — that had caught fire and leaked
radioactive water as a result. Usually this time of year northern
Japan is bustling with visitors, but tourism in the area over the
next weeks was down by 90%, NHK said.

Apparently most Japanese people didn’t believe the government’s
assurances that the radioactive leak was `insignificant.’ After all
they’ve been through with radiation, it’s easy to understand why.

On NHK they were also broadcasting the Asian Cup, the Asian version
of the World Cup, one of the most-watched sporting events on the
planet. (Except for in the US, where the 45 minutes of uninterrupted
play make soccer a commercially unviable sport for TV.) Iraq won, and
in halting English, the Iraqi team’s captain spoke out in front of
the world’s media against the US occupation of his country, and said
that after the game he was going to Qatar because it wasn’t safe to
live in Iraq. He spoke of some of his dead friends and family
members.

And then it occurred to me, not for the first time, but there in
Japan for the first time, the thought hit me that the United States
has been bombing a nation somewhere in Asia for most of the past 66
years. So soon after the virtual annihilation of Japan from the air,
the USAF went ahead and did the same thing in Korea, dropping even
more bombs on Korea than all sides in WWII combined, killing millions
of innocent people and half a million Chinese soldiers (did you even
know, dear reader, that we fought a war with China?).

In the same year that that war ended, we were sending in Theodore
Roosevelt’s grandson, Kermit, to overthrow the democratically-elected
government of Iran, replacing him with one of history’s most
tyrannical dictators, the Shah, who was to rule Iran with unspeakable
brutality for the next quarter century.

Then a few years later we were to invade Vietnam, completely
destroying the country over the course of fifteen very long years, in
the course of which we also invaded Laos and Cambodia, killing an
estimated three million innocent civilians through indiscrimate
carpet-bombing of three countries, leading directly to the insane
Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia which then proceeded to kill so many
more. (And I wretch every time I hear yet another person in the US
say that `55,000 people died in Vietnam.’ Just what defines `people’
to those who would utter such a scandalous sentence?)
There are always pretenses for these invasions, and they are never
called invasions. We support dictatorships in the name of democracy,
overthrow democracies in the name of fighting `communism,’ and when
that bogeyman no longer inspired fear, then `terrorism’ became the
new watchword. And every day, more people worldwide die in car
accidents than die in a year from non-state terrorism. Every day,
more people die from falling down the stairs than those who die in a
year from non-state terrorism. Every day, far more people die from
breathing the toxic air – of cancer – than those who die in a year
from non-state terrorism. But we invade countries and kill millions
to stop the `terrorists,’ while we relax environmental laws (in the
name of `the economy’) which results directly in the deaths of
millions more.

And when people in `America’ doubt the wisdom of these invasions,
when people raise questions about our government spending more every
year on `defense’ than the rest of the world combined while our
cities are flooded, our bridges are collapsing, and millions of our
children are going to bed hungry, sick and without health care, or
the ability to read or write, we are told that we mustn’t be
`isolationist.’ We are told that there are `evil men’ and `evil
regimes’ in this world that we must stop before they acquire nuclear
weapons.

But they are mostly arming themselves to defend themselves from a
possible – even likely – invasion by us. This is the historical
reality, whatever the pundits say, whatever the textbooks say,
whatever the politicians say. (And if you’d like to see the hard
evidence, please pick up a copy of Joseph Gerson’s excellent book,
Empire and the Bomb.)

Somehow we are never the ones who started it. Somehow we need to have
these 10,000 nuclear weapons, each one 1,000 times deadlier than the
bomb that annihilated Hiroshima. And if you don’t believe it, they
say, if our arguments about evil regimes and WMD’s and democracy are
not convincing, remember World War II. Remember Hitler, remember the
Nazi holocaust, remember the `Good War.’ (Now, if you believe that
the US entered the war in Europe to save my Jewish relatives then
maybe you also believe that we’re in Iraq to save the Kurds and the
Shiites, and I’ve got a bridge to sell you in Minneapolis, but I’ll
save that tract for another essay.)

Remember the Good War. Remember the Rape of Nanking, when Japanese
occupation soldiers raped and murdered their way through China,
killing an estimated 100,000 in Nanking alone. Remember Hitler, who
systematically killed millions in an orchestrated orgy of death
unlike anything the world had ever seen — well, at least not since
the Turks and their Kurdish underlings did the same thing to the
Armenians, with nobody seriously doing anything to stop them, one
short generation earlier, during the dying throes of the defeated
Ottoman Empire.

Systematic killing of millions in an orchestrated, high-tech
genocide, aimed at wiping out entire populations of human beings.

Walking around the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the reminders of
the atomic bombings, and of the desire of the people of these cities
for a peaceful world free of nuclear weapons, are everywhere. On
plaques, in museums, in the parks. Everywhere I went, walking around
beneath the blazing sun that shines mercilessly, constantly, after
the rainy season ends every summer, I just kept getting the same
cold, eerie feeling I remember well from visiting the concentration
camps that have been preserved for posterity in Germany.

Visting Buchenwald I remember the feeling, how can such an
unspeakable horror as the Nazi holocaust possibly be represented
effectively within the walls of a building? How can pictures, videos,
hair, shoes, teeth, the few remains of the many dead, how can these
things project the scope of this nightmare? They can’t, really. But
somehow, being there – and I know I’m not alone in this feeling – the
ghosts are alive. Sit quietly for a few minutes in Buchenwald and you
can hear the screams of the dying, feel the silence of the dead. The
single candle burning in the middle of the empty room in the former
gas chamber, with the Jewish prayer for forgiveness in the
background, somehow communicates more than you might imagine if you
haven’t been there.

It’s like that in Hiroshima. Seeing the few documentaries that ever
make it onto TV in the US, hearing the testimonies of the hibakusha
who occasionally visit the country that destroyed their cities and
speak to the relatively few people who come to hear them, just isn’t
the same. These cities were wiped out. They ceased to exist.
Everything was gone. How can nothingness be memorialized? It can’t.

But of the three steel-reinforced, concrete structures in Hiroshima
that partially survived the apocalypse of August 6th, 1945, what is
known as the Atomic Dome has been left as it was on that day. Mostly
destroyed, but still recognizable as a building. Most of the concrete
turned to rubble, steel beams bent like straw, the inside completely
gutted and burned long ago, when my parents were children.

This is what happened to an earthquake-proof, steel-reinforced
structure. But this was a city of small wooden houses with clay tile
roofs. All around this dome for miles, in this city surrounded by
mountains, in this valley as far as the eye could see, were just
flattened houses. In and around those houses, 70,000 people died in a
matter of seconds, mostly women, children, and senior citizens.

Thousands more lived long enough – sometimes only a few minutes,
sometimes a few hours – to walk, naked, their clothes having been
burned off of them, their bodies charred black and red, their skin
hanging off of them like seaweed, their arms outstretched, crying,
walking on top of the collapsed houses of their neighbors, stepping
over the dead and dying, walking towards one of the two rivers that
flowed through the city. Many died before they got to the river,
others died once they got to the river, and the rivers turned red
from blood, and then black from radioactive ash that rained down from
the sky. There were so many bodies in the river that they piled up
and formed a huge dam.

Standing between those rivers, there in front of the dome at 3 am one
evening, the words of the hibakusha I had had dinner with earlier
came back to me. They were recounting the bits that they remembered,
that trauma-induced amnesia had not obliterated. Every time was like
reliving the experience, but they felt duty-bound to tell the stories
to those who would listen.

Dr. Shoji Sawada was 13 when the bomb fell. He was sick that day, and
unlike most people in Hiroshima, at 8:15 am he was not up and about,
but was in bed, shielded by walls from the initial flash of light
that burned tens of thousands of people to a crisp instantly. Shoji
suddenly found himself covered in the rubble of his house, but
managed to squirm out from under it.

Then he heard his mother calling.

He looked around and couldn’t see her. Then he realized she was
beneath him, pinned underneath a smoldering beam of wood. He tried
with all his might to move the beam, but it was far beyond his
physical abilities. He looked outside for help, but everyone around
him was dead or dying.

He went back in and tried to move the beam again, to no avail.

The initial blast was as hot as the sun, which is what instantly
killed anybody within a kilometer of it who was directly exposed, and
most people within several kilometers of it.

Immediately following this was a massive gust of wind many times
stronger than the strongest typhoon, which is what flattened all the
houses and snapped all the trees like toothpicks (leaving only parts
of those few aforementioned steel structures, and a number of
smokestacks, their cylindrical shape protecting them from the blast
of wind).

Just after the wind, Shoji-san explained, everything combustible
immediately caught fire. With the flames lapping at his legs, unable
to move the beam of wood, he said, `forgive me, mother,’ and ran
towards the river.

`Study hard and be a good student,’ were her last words.

And then she was burned to death, as her son survived the rest of the
day in the river, surrounded by what can only be described as hell on
Earth. Every day he remembers his mother, and her last words, and
feels the pain and the guilt of the survivor once again.

Now multiply this scene by 70,000.

This was premeditated, high-tech mass murder targeted at civilians.
Genocide. It was the Japanese holocaust. It was done to a country
that was in complete ruins, whose government was in the process of
attempting to surrender, but the `Allies’ were pretending not to hear
these messages because they wanted to drop the bomb first, to `send a
message’ to the Soviet Union, among other reasons. It was done to a
country that had virtually no functioning industry. Yes, Mitsubishi
had an armanents factory in Hiroshima, I learned from a visit to the
museum there, but what the museum didn’t mention was that the workers
were going there and waiting for parts which never arrived. Japanese
industry was essentially totally crippled by the summer of 1945.
There was no military value to the city of Hiroshima – even if having
military value could possibly justify slaughtering 70,000 civilians.

Against the advice of most of the top military brass, Truman and
Churchill connived to drop the atom bomb on Hiroshima, knowing full
well that it would result in indiscriminate death and destruction to
an entire city.

And then they did it again, three days later, in Nagasaki, after the
Japanese emperor had personally become involved in attempting to
surrender to the `Allies,’ under the same conditions of Germany’s
surrender at Potsdam. Incidentally, the bomb over Nagasaki was
dropped directly above the biggest concentration of Catholics in East
Asia, almost directly over the biggest cathedral in East Asia, over a
city that contained a POW camp, and all this was known to Truman and
Churchill and his advisors who supported dropping the first and
second bombs.

Completely annihilating one city full of civilians, and then doing it
to another – after raining down death from `conventional’ bombs
indiscriminately throughout almost every population center in the
nation. This `conventional’ holocaust of unprecedented proportions
was carried out by `FDR,’ that great hero of the working class in the
United States. Nuclear hell on Earth was brought to Hiroshima and
Nagasaki by that down-to-Earth hoosier who never went to college,
Harry Truman, and by his good friend Winston Churchill, the man
lionized in the history books for saving Britain from Nazi tyranny.
The fact that he also ordered the gassing of Iraqis a few years
earlier and supervised the firebombing of Dresden, Berlin, Hamburg
and most other major cities in Germany, himself responsible for
killing hundreds of thousands of German civilians, is usually
conveniently overlooked.

There was no `Good War.’

Every war the US has been involved with since the `American’
Revolution has been a war for empire, based on lies just as blatant
as Colin Powell’s 31 lies he presented to the UN a few short years
ago, as the corporate media hung on every ridiculous word. The
victors write most of the histories, but many other histories are out
there, often out of print, growing mold on the book shelves in the
libraries of `America,’ rarely used. As a result, we are a nation
made up largely of idiots (thank you, Green Day). A Gallup poll two
years ago asked people in the US whether they thought the dropping of
the atomic bombs on Japan was `necessary’ to end the war. 57% said it
was. This is beyond shameful, not to mention completely a-historical,
proof of the effectiveness of the bald propaganda of the victors of
this `Good War.’

What if you asked a modern-day German whether they thought the
holocaust was `necessary’ — perhaps `necessary’ to garner support
for the German occupation from the largely anti-Semitic populations
of the nations of eastern Europe?

Even the very question would be appalling. Anyone answering `yes’
would be considered something akin to a holocaust denier, some kind
of monster, appropriately enough. What if you asked a modern-day
Japanese person if the rape of Nanking was `necessary’? If he was a
politician and answered in the affirmative to this question he would
probably be driven out of office, just like Prime Minister Abe’s
Defense Minister last month.

No, the Japanese Holocaust was not `necessary.’ By any reasonable
accounting of history, what was done to Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a
holocaust as horrible in scope as what the Nazis did to Europe,
except that it was carried out in a matter of seconds rather than
years. By any reasonable accounting of history, Harry Truman and
Winston Churchill were morally equivalent to Adolf Hitler. By any
reasonable accounting of history, those in charge of the US Air Force
were moral equivalents of the SS.

And why does it matter whether long-dead presidents were war
criminals or not? Because the cliché is true: if you don’t understand
history, you are doomed to repeat it. Because many of the hibakusha
in Japan and around the world are still alive, and they deserve some
ounce of dignity. Because if you believe the billionaires that run
this country are capable of fighting a `Good War,’ capable of
defending the rights of the oppressed somewhere in the world, you
might believe they could do that again. But they never have, they
aren’t now, and they never will. Not in Vietnam, not in Afghanistan,
not in Iraq, not in Iran, not in Syria, not in North Korea, nowhere.

They are running an empire — a vicious, genocidal empire that’s been
dominating much of the world for many decades. Kennedy was running it
– he nearly ended life on Earth twice in his short tenure as
president. Eisenhower, the butcher of Korea, was running it. Johnson,
the butcher of Vietnam, was running it. Nixon, the butcher of
Cambodia, was running it. Clinton was running it – he, like the rest,
threatened to use nuclear weapons against both Iraq and Korea. He
said `nuclear weapons are the cornerstone of our foreign policy.’ His
wife, Hillary, has also said `all options are on the table.’ And we
hopefully all know about Bush.

All of these people were (and in the case of the Clintons and the
Bushes, are) terrorists of the worst kind. They are nuclear
terrorists.

What they seem to have learned from history is that it’s OK to kill
and to threaten to kill millions of innocent civilians – and to risk
the lives of billions more, including hundreds of millions of
vulnerable people inside the United States – if they deem that it
serves their interests.

What is clearly in our interests – and certainly in the interests of
other human beings around the world – is to rise up against these
`democratic’ despots. If there is any possibility of redeeming the
soul of this place we call `America,’ this madness must be stopped.
We may have exported our entire manufacturing base to China, but the
weapons of mass destruction (and most of our `conventional’ weapons)
are still made in the USA.

The functioning of the government requires the consent of the
governed. It can and must be withdrawn. One by one, or hopefully, in
our millions. The most important lesson of history, the one that the
rulers of `America’ most want to keep from us, is that mass movements
can achieve everything. That another world is possible. That
democracy is in the streets. And that `evil’ does not usually come in
the form of a frothing-at-the-mouth dictator.

Evil, as has been pointed out before, is more often banal. Evil pays
taxes. Evil pushes papers. Evil designs missiles, programs computers.
Evil drops the bombs, but evil also sits by while others do that, and
evil watches and fails to act. Evil is silent. Evil is patriotic.
Evil waves a flag. Evil writes lying propaganda for textbooks and
newspapers. Evil believes that genocide could possibly be excusable,
let alone `necessary.’

ent/view/1522/81/

http://www.pacificfreepress.com/cont

NKR: Aradjamough, that is to say pushing forward

Azat Artsakh Tert, Nagorno Karabakh Republic
Aug 10 2007

Aradjamough, that is to say pushing forward

by
Svetlana Khachatrian

The head of the Fund Andranik Gasparian represents:- "Charitable Fund
"Tufenkian" works about 8 years in RA. Its office was founded in 2003
in Artsakh. Discussing with the founder James Tufenkian about
Karabakh’s today situation, we came to a conclusion, that here it
must go towards the direction of immigration. Though we have also
programs in other spheres. But the main stress is laid on the border
zone, on immigration of liberating territories. Seeing the situation
of Artsakh regions, which needs economical development, we decided to
do two types of immigration, thr first – to found new villages, as
for example Aradjamough, and the second – to develop the works in
already settled territories. Kashatagh region enters the second
"type". It needn’t begin from zero. There are villages, but they are
very poor. We are trying by various programs to raise living standard
of the people. We built a mill in Aygehovit village, emergancy room –
in Ishkhanadzor, and founded about 40 hectares of vinefields. The
first stage has alredy been finished, and we’ve begun the second one
– internet courses". On August 7th, it was the opening of Aradjamough
village. The deputy of NA A. Harutyunian, the ministers A. Tsaturian,
K. Ataian, the heads of Hadrut region board of administration, the
leaders of Artsakh programs of "Tufenkian" Fund, journalists also
from RA presented there. The settlements of neighbour villages have a
desire to settle in Aradjnamough, but the choice is very strict. Only
the immigrants have a right to settle down here. A. Gasparian says. "
I want any person comes here, admires and says – it’s a good work!.
But I’ll do better than Tufenkian, and he will be glad for that.
Villages must be immigrated, strengthened and developed.