Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 29-09-21

Save

Share

 17:19,

YEREVAN, 29 SEPTEMBER, ARMENPRESS. The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 29 September, USD exchange rate up by 0.88 drams to 483.49 drams. EUR exchange rate up by 0.45 drams to 563.99 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate up by 0.01 drams to 6.65 drams. GBP exchange rate down by 4.36 drams to 653.97 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price stood at 27235.71 drams. Silver price stood at 349.97 drams. Platinum price stood at 15299.04 drams.

Newly appointed Ambassador of France to Armenia Anne Louyot presents copies of credentials to FM Mirzoyan

Save

Share

 18:56,

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 29, ARMENPRESS. Newly appointed Ambassador of France to Armenia Anne Louyot delivered copies of credentials to Foreign Minister of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan on September 29.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the MFA Armenia, Ararat Mirzoyan expressed confidence that Anne Louyot will contribute to the deepening and strengthening of cooperation between Armenia and France in all spheres.

Photos by Gevorg Perkuperkyan

FM Mirzoyan noted that Armenia attaches great importance to the future deepening of the unique relations with France. In this context, the interlocutors first of all discussed the implementation of concrete programs for the promotion and expansion of Armenian-French cooperation in the economic sphere, as well as further prospects for strengthening ties in the educational and cultural spheres.

During the meeting, reference was made to the situation created by the Azerbaijani-Turkish aggression against Artsakh, as well as by the penetration of Azerbaijani troops into the sovereign territory of Armenia.

Minister Mirzoyan highly appreciated the great attention of France, its parliament, and personally President Macron paid to the return of Armenian prisoners of war and civilian hostages, the protection of historical and cultural heritage in the territories of Artsakh under Azerbaijani control.

Both sides stressed the need for the resumption of peace talks within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs aimed at a comprehensive settlement of the conflict and the establishment of stability and security in the region.

CivilNet: The Address Nikol Pashinyan Did Not Deliver — on the anniversary of the Second Karabakh War

CIVILNET.AM

29 Sep, 2021 07:09

By Karen Harutyunyan, Editor-in-Chief, CivilNet

On the first anniversary of the outbreak of the Second Karabakh / Artsakh War, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan did not address the nation. If he had, what would his message have been? Here is my imaginary version. 

Dear Compatriots,

Today is September 27, the anniversary of the outbreak of the Second Karabakh War. A war that cost us more than 4,000 lives. Hundreds of boys are still missing. Dozens of prisoners suffer in Azerbaijan’s prisons. I thought those boys would forgive us for remaining “a month or two longer” in captivity. But the months pass and they do not return. We do not have clear information about their numbers or condition. Sometimes, when our boys do return, they are accompanied by the bodies of other prisoners.

One year later, many questions remain unanswered. More than 2,000 cases of crimes committed during the war are being investigated. 

The truth is that we lost the war because of the enormous amount of corruption in the country and in the armed forces, and because we had been deceived by myths about our boundless power – a myth that I myself believed. 

There are many questions that need answers in order for us to understand the reasons for Armenia’s defeat. As a society, as a state, as a nation, we must try to find the answers to these questions and prevent the recurrence of such a calamity in the future.

Today, however, I would like to answer questions about my share of guilt and responsibility.

Did I comprehend the full complexity of the Karabakh conflict after taking office in 2018?

In the post-revolutionary euphoric environment, I failed to understand the existential significance of the Karabakh issue for our state and our people. My pronouncements that “I began the negotiations from my own personal starting point”, and that “we are negotiating for whatever we want”, that “the settlement of the Karabakh conflict must be acceptable for the people of Armenia, the people of Artsakh and the people of Azerbaijan” had no analytical basis and were simply my heart’s desires. 

I naively believed that I had taken unprecedented and clever steps. I did not understand the tremendous diplomatic work carried out by my so-hated predecessors. They, in fact, had worked to reach a basic negotiation principle, which was the realization of the right of the people of Nagorno Karabakh to self-determination through the free _expression_ of their will.

At that time, I was only guided by my rejection of everything that came before me. Since the day I came to power, those who were in power before me constantly accused me of selling out lands, realizing very well the fatal state of the Karabakh negotiations. I swallowed that bait, which resulted in the hopeless statement “Artsakh is Armenia. Period.” Another one of my obvious diplomatic failures was the primitive Munich debate, in which I participated without properly doing my homework. 

Today, I am struggling to answer this question: Could I have prevented the war? 

I do not know. Perhaps. But at the very least I should have tried not to bring war closer to us.

I naively thought that “the victorious battles in July 2020 proved that there is no military solution to the Karabakh issue“, that “we will have a new war, and new territories“, that “Turkey will not interfere“.

My other question is this: Could I have stopped the war?

I thought that “we’d be able to break the enemy’s backbone“, and then I did not dare stop the war so that “people would not say ‘Nikol, traitor’“.

It’s true that I did not have the courage of a leader at a time when many people and many things could still be saved.

I regret all of this. I truly do.

Dear Compatriots,

I used to say “Artsakh is Armenia. Period.” but one year after the war, Armenia’s leader can no longer set foot in Artsakh. This is the harsh reality. 

To the relatives of the dead, the missing, the captives, the wounded:

I understand the impossibility of what I ask, but please forgive me.

*All phrases in quotes are excerpts from Pashinyan’s statements of the last three years.

CivilNet: Explaining the €2.6 billion EU package for Armenia

CIVILNET.AM

29 Sep, 2021 08:09

Andrea Wiktorin, the European Union Ambassador to Armenia, in conversation with CivilNet’s Eric Hacopian, explains the details, focus and processes of the €2.6 billion EU funding package to Armenia. Ambassador Wiktorin discusses how the success of this package can be ensured and what her message would be to critics who believe these funds are meant to distract from the inaction of the EU during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war.

CivilNet: Aliyev says he is ready to meet Pashinyan under the auspices of the OSCE

CIVILNET.AM

29 Sep, 2021 10:09

  • Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev states that he is not against having a meeting with Pashinyan under the auspices of OSCE Minsk Group.
  • Azerbaijani and Iranian officials argue over military drills on the border between both nations.
  • Freedom House expresses concern over a criminal case initiated over Facebook user’s comments about Pashinyan.

Credits: Ruptly

Erdoğan assesses meeting with Putin productive

Save

Share

 19:07,

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 29, ARMENPRESS. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan described the meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Sochi as productive, ARMENPRESS reports, Erdoğan wrote in his Telegram account following the meeting.

"After fruitful talks with my colleague Putin, we left Sochi," he wrote.

The meeting of the two Presidents lasted for about three hours, they did not make a statement to the press. The situation in Nagorno Karabakh was discussed, inter alia. Putin referred to the activities of the Center for the Monitoring of the Ceasefire Regime in Nagorno-Karabakh, noting that Russian-Turkish cooperation in this issue is a "serious guarantee of stability" in the region.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 09/29/2021

                                        Wednesday, 


Yerevan Reassures Iranian Envoy Over Bypass Road

        • Naira Nalbandian

Armenia - Armenia's Deputy Prime Minister Suren Papikian (right) meets with 
Iranian Ambassador Abbas Badakhshan Zohouri, Yerevan, .


Deputy Prime Minister Suren Papikian told Iran’s ambassador in Yerevan on 
Wednesday that Armenia will complete soon work on an alternative road that will 
allow Iranian trucks to bypass an Azerbaijani roadblock set up on the main 
highway connecting the two states.

Azerbaijan gained control over a 21-kilometer section of the highway last 
December following an Armenian troop withdrawal from border areas along 
Armenia’s southeastern Syunik province. Azerbaijani officers deployed there 
began stopping and taxing on September 12 Iranian trucks delivering goods to and 
from Armenia. Many truck drivers have refused to pay the “road tax” reportedly 
ranging from $150 to $350 per vehicle.

Iranian Ambassador Abbas Badakhshan Zohouri has since met with various Armenian 
officials to discuss the resulting disruptions in cargo traffic between Armenia 
and Iran. He said last week that Tehran hopes the Armenian government will speed 
up the ongoing reconstruction of the alternative Syunik road bypassing 
Armenian-Azerbaijani border areas.

In a statement, Papikian said he assured Zohouri that the 70-kilometer bypass 
road will be fully refurbished “by the end of November.” He also reiterated that 
it will be extended further north to divert traffic from a tortuous mountain 
pass outside the Syunik village of Tatev.

Papikian added that he also reaffirmed the Armenian government’s plans to build 
or refurbish other Syunik roads leading to the Iranian border. The government 
hopes that the European Union and other international donors will finance the 
ambitious project worth an estimated $1 billion.

Iran is a major trading partner of Armenia and one of the landlocked country’s 
two conduits to the outside the world. Up to one-third of Armenia’s foreign 
trade is carried out via the Islamic Republic and its Persian Gulf ports in 
particular.

Yerevan has reacted to cautiously to Baku’s decision to levy hefty fees from 
Iranian vehicles entering Armenia. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian suggested on 
September 15 the move is aimed at pressuring Armenia to open a transport 
corridor that would connect Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave through 
Syunik. But he stopped short of demanding an end to the serious hurdle to 
Armenia’s transport links with Iran.

Gohar Iskandarian, a Yerevan-based Iran expert, also pointed to Papikian’s 
recent remark that it is up to Tehran and Baku to sort out the road crisis.

“Iran and Azerbaijan are talking about the problem in a quite forceful way, 
whereas Armenia is making no such statements,” Iskandarian told RFE/RL’s 
Armenian Service. “On the contrary, [Yerevan] has adopted a very passive stance, 
saying that this is beyond the scope of our powers.”

Shortly after Baku set up the roadblock the Iranian military reportedly began 
massing troops and holding exercises along the Iranian-Azerbaijani border. 
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev criticized the drills on Monday. Iran’s 
Foreign Ministry dismissed the criticism.



Armenian Officials Reject Freedom House Criticism

        • Gayane Saribekian

Armenia - Deputies from the ruling Civil Contract party attend the inaugural 
session of the recently elected National Assemnly, Yerevan, August 2, 2021.


Pro-government lawmakers dismissed on Wednesday U.S. democracy watchdog Freedom 
House’s strong criticism of recently enacted legislation allowing Armenian 
authorities prosecute people insulting state officials.

The amendments to the Armenian Criminal Code make “grave insults” directed at 
individuals because of their “public activities” crimes punishable by heavy 
fines and a prison sentence of up to three months. Those individuals may include 
government and law-enforcement officials, politicians and other public figures.

Invoking the new Criminal Code clauses, the Armenian police launched earlier 
this month criminal proceedings against a social media user who allegedly made 
an offensive comment about Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian on his Facebook page.

Freedom House deplored the development in a statement issued on Tuesday. The 
Washington-based watchdog urged the Armenian authorities to stop enforcing “this 
unconstitutional legislation” which it said indicates a “clear degradation of 
democratic norms in Armenia, including freedom of expression.”

Vahagn Hovakimian, a parliament deputy from Pashinian’s Civil Contract party and 
one of the authors of the legislation, denied such a regression in the country. 
He said that Pashinian’s political team criminalized grave insults, rather than 
defamation.

“I am saddened to see inaccurate things in the Freedom House appeal because the 
international organization was misled in this particular case,” the former 
journalist told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service.

Another pro-government lawmaker, Zaruhi Batoyan, also defended the controversial 
amendments. She said they are needed to tackle widespread verbal abuse 
circulated on Armenian social media accounts.

“Maybe this should be a temporary solution, but it is necessary at this point 
and our social life testifies to that,” said the former labor minister and civic 
activist.

By contrast, Artsvik Minasian, a parliamentary leader of the main opposition 
Hayastan alliance, echoed the Freedom House criticism.

“This law cannot contribute to Armenia’s democratic development,” said Minasian. 
“On the contrary, it will help Armenia regress in the objective rankings of all 
human rights organizations.”

Hayastan and other opposition groups claim that Pashinian himself has relied 
heavily on slander and “hate speech” since coming to power in 2018.

All forms of slander and defamation had been decriminalized in Armenia in 2010 
during then President Serzh Sarkisian’s rule.



Armenia's Water Operator Seeking Price Hike

        • Artak Khulian

Armenia - A sign outside the Yerevan headquarters of the Veolia Djur company, 
September 2, 2018.


A French company managing Armenia’s water distribution network has asked public 
utility regulators to allow it to raise the price of drinking water in the 
country by over 24 percent.

The price has stood at 180 drams (37 U.S. cents) per cubic meter ever since the 
Veolia utility giant took over the nationwide network in 2017 after signing a 
15-year management contract with the former Armenian government.

Garegin Baghramian, the chairman of the Public Services Regulatory Commission 
(PSRC), said on Wednesday that the company’s Armenian subsidiary, Veolia Djur, 
requested last month permission to raise it to almost 224 drams per cubic meter. 
The operator cited, among other things, higher-than-expected inflation and the 
increased cost of electricity, he told reporters.

Under Armenian law, the PSRC has to fully or partly approve the tariff rise or 
reject it by December 1.

Baghramian signaled the regulatory body’s intention to agree to a higher water 
price. He argued that the management contract with Veolia envisages price hikes 
for the coming years.

But he stressed that the tariff will likely remain unchanged for about 100,000 
low-income households that already enjoy electricity and natural gas price 
discounts.

The official also revealed that the PSRC and the government are negotiating with 
Veolia on a deal that would set a fixed water price for the next 10 years.

Veolia managed the water and sewerage network of Yerevan from 2007-2016, phasing 
out Soviet-era water rationing in the vast majority of city neighborhoods. The 
2016 contract commits it to investing 37.5 billion drams ($77 million) in 
Armenia’s aging and inefficient water distribution network.

It is not clear how much the company has invested so far. Veolia Djur has still 
not responded to relevant questions sent by RFE/RL’s Armenian Service last week.



Dozens Of Karabakh Civilians Still Missing After 2020 War

        • Karlen Aslanian

NAGORNO-KARABAKH -- An Azeri military truck drives along a street in the town of 
Hadrut, November 25, 2020


About two dozen civilian residents of Nagorno-Karabakh remain unaccounted for 
one year after the outbreak of the Armenian-Azerbaijani war, according to the 
authorities in Stepanakert.

“They are mostly elderly or disabled individuals who did not manage to leave 
their places of residence in the Hadrut, Shushi and Askeran districts [occupied 
by Azerbaijani forces,]” Gegham Stepanian, Karabakh’s human rights ombudsman, 
told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service on Wednesday.

“I presume that those individuals too were subjected to torture or killed, but 
their bodies have not been handed over to the Armenian side to date,” he said. 
“It is also possible that some of them remain in Azerbaijani captivity. 
Azerbaijan does not provide any real information about their whereabouts.”

Stepanian claimed that 38 other Karabakh Armenian civilians were executed or 
tortured to death after being captured by Azerbaijani forces. He said their 
bodies recovered by Karabakh authorities bore traces of violence.

In December 2020, Britain’s The Guardian daily examined gruesome videos that 
show men in Azerbaijani army uniforms beheading two elderly men recognized by 
their Karabakh Armenian relatives and neighbors.

“The ethnic Armenian men were non-combatants, people in their respective 
villages said,” reported the paper.

“The villagers’ testimony in interviews with the Guardian corroborates 
identifications by a human rights ombudsman for the Armenian-backed local 
government and two prominent Armenian human rights lawyers preparing a criminal 
case relating to the murders,” it said.

So far Azerbaijan has admitted detaining only three ethnic Armenian civilians 
during the six-week war stopped by a Russian-brokered ceasefire last November. 
It has denied ill-treating them or Armenian soldiers taken prisoner.

According to Baku, 93 civilian residents of Azerbaijani towns and villages 
shelled by the Armenian military were killed during the hostilities.

Stepanian’s office has reported 42 civilian deaths caused by Azerbaijani 
shelling of Karabakh.

The war also left at least 3,700 Armenian soldiers dead. According to Armenian 
authorities, 231 others remain unaccounted for.

Azerbaijan’s government has acknowledged more than 2,800 combat deaths in the 
Azerbaijani army ranks.


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2021 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Turkish press: US ambassador nominee warns Turkey could face more sanctions

Then-Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., speaks to members of the media on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., Nov. 18, 2018. (AP File Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

The U.S. Ambassador to Turkey nominee Jeff Flake said Turkey would face more sanctions if it purchases additional S-400 missiles from Russia.

Responding to questions at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday, Flake criticized Turkey's purchase, saying “any purchase of additional Russian weapons will result in additional sanctions.”

“If confirmed, I will consistently reiterate that disposing of this system is the path to removing CAATSA (Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act) sanctions,” Flake said.

On Monday, senators warned Turkey on the extension of sanctions in case of additional purchases. The warning came after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan last week said they still intended to acquire a new batch of S-400 defense systems, despite Washington’s opposition.

Ties between NATO allies Turkey and the U.S. were strained over Ankara’s acquisition of the advanced S-400 Russian air defense system, prompting Washington to remove Turkey from its F-35 Lightning II jet program.

The U.S. argued that the system could be used by Russia to covertly obtain classified details on the Lockheed Martin F-35 jets and is incompatible with NATO systems. Turkey, however, insists that the S-400 would not be integrated into NATO systems and would not pose a threat to the alliance.

Meanwhile, Flake, who had rejected the so-called Armenian genocide during his term as a senator, said he would recognize it if he is appointed as ambassador.

Biden described the killings of Ottoman Armenians during World War I as “genocide” in April.

“We remember the lives of all those who died in the Ottoman-era Armenian genocide and recommit ourselves to preventing such an atrocity from ever again occurring,” Biden said. “And we remember so that we remain ever-vigilant against the corrosive influence of hate in all its forms,” he said.

“We do this not to cast blame but to ensure that what happened is never repeated,” Biden said.

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu was quick to condemn the statement.

“We have nothing to learn from anybody on our own past. Political opportunism is the greatest betrayal to peace and justice. We entirely reject this statement based solely on populism,” Çavuşoğlu said in a Twitter post.

With the acknowledgment, Biden followed through on a campaign promise he made a year ago. Mainly hailing from Ottoman Armenians, Armenians in the U.S. constitute significant communities in East Coast and California.

Turkey’s position on the 1915 events is that the death of Armenians in eastern Anatolia took place when some sided with invading Russians and revolted against Ottoman forces. A subsequent relocation of Armenians resulted in numerous casualties, added by massacres from militaries and militia groups of both sides. The mass arrests of prominent Ottoman Armenian politicians, intellectuals and other community members suspected of links with separatist groups, where those harboring nationalist sentiments and being hostile to Ottoman rule were rounded up in then-capital Istanbul on April 24, 1915, are commemorated as the beginning of later atrocities.

Turkey objects to the presentation of the incidents as “genocide” but describes the 1915 events as a tragedy in which both sides suffered casualties.

Ankara has repeatedly proposed the creation of a joint commission of historians from Turkey and Armenia plus international experts to tackle the issue.

The Senate committee members have until Wednesday to submit more questions to Flake. His nomination will be voted in the senate if approved but the date is unclear.

Flake served in the U.S. Senate for Arizona from 2013 to 2019 and in the U.S. House from 2001 to 2013. Flake retired from the Senate at the end of his term in 2019, saying he was out of step with the Republican Party in the era of former President Donald Trump.

He later wrote a book, "Conscience of a Conservative,” that was a critique of Trump.

"With this nomination, the Biden Administration reaffirms the best tradition of American foreign policy and diplomacy: The credo that partisan politics should stop at the water’s edge. U.S. foreign policy can and should be bipartisan,” Flake said in a statement. "That is my belief as well, and my commitment,” he noted.

Flake was one of more than two dozen former Republican deputies to announce their support for "Republicans for Biden.” Former Reps. Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, Jim Greenwood of Pennsylvania and Jim Leach of Iowa and Sen. John Warner of Virginia, who died in May, are among the former Republican lawmakers who endorsed Biden last year.

The list of disagreements is unusually long for the two NATO allies: There is U.S. support for YPG terrorists, the PKK's Syrian offshoot in Syria, as well as Turkey’s purchase of the Russian S-400 air defense system. And in April, Biden infuriated Ankara by declaring that the 1915 events regarding the Ottoman Armenians during World War I as "genocide.”

Turkish press: France’s Darmanin takes stock of Macron’s anti-Muslim campaign

French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin reacts as he leaves the French Presidential Palace after a weekly Cabinet meeting, Paris, France, Sept. 22, 2021. (AFP Photo)

France is moving forward with its offensive campaign against the country's Muslim population, further shutting mosques and centers on the pretext of "radical propaganda," in a move that critics say promotes hate speech and Islamophobia within the nation and abroad.

One year after French President Emmanuel Macron announced the national fight against "Islamic separatism" during a speech in Lex Mureaux, Paris, Interior Minister Gerard Darmanin assumed the responsibility of taking stock of a plan that mainly targets Muslims in a country that loudly claims to be the vocal advocate for secularism, rights and freedom.

In an interview with French newspaper Le Figaro, Darmanin said Tuesday that "never French government done so much against political Islam."

"About 10 structures were dissolved in four years. That is to say three times more than under the two previous terms of office combined," Darmanin bragged. "Even before the separatism law promulgated at the end of August, this struggle was at the origin," he added.

Alongside the minister for citizenship, Marlene Schiappa, Darmanin also presented a new plan stating that France seeks to shut six more mosques and break up several associations. He added that a third of the 89 places of worship "suspected of being radical" and flagged by the intelligence services had been checked since November 2020. Of those, an action to shut down six – in five different departments across France – had been launched, he said, according to remarks carried by Agence France-Presse (AFP).

The authorities would also request the dissolution of the publishers Nawa and the Black African Defence League (LDNA), describing them as contrary to "Western values" and having "separatist tendencies," which Darmanin announced on Twitter.

He noted that the necessary steps have been taken to freeze the assets of the publishing house and detain the managers of the company.

Le Figaro newspaper also reported that the Nawa publishing house was asked to close down "due to its anti-universal, separatist and anti-Western publishing line.” Darmanin accused the managers of the publishing house, whose full name is the Nawa Center for Oriental Studies and Translation, of being connected to extremists, as Anadolu Agency (AA) reported.

On its website, Nawa publishing house describes itself as an organization that aims to "promote the human and political sciences born of Islamic heritage" and "contribute to the revitalization of these disciplines by studying the Western world and sciences, modern political ideology and doctrines."

Meanwhile, the French interior minister accused the LDNA, the organizers of a protest against police violence in front of the United States Embassy in Paris June last year, of "calls for hate and discrimination."

"In the coming year, 10 other associations are going to be the object of a dissolution procedure, four (of) them next month," he remarked.

Last week, the Council of State, France's highest administrative court, approved the government's move to dissolve the Collective against Islamophobia in France (CCIF) and Baraka City.

In October of last year, Macron unveiled a new bill that would extend the ban on religious emblems, which notably affects Muslim women who wear headscarves or veils, to private-sector employees providing public services.

In stark contrast to dissolving Muslim publishing houses and arresting their managers, Macron previously said that he will not prevent the releasing of insulting cartoons of Prophet Muhammad under the pretext of freedom of _expression_, a statement that sparked outrage in the Arab and Muslim world. Even though caricatures insulting a prophet are legal in France on freedom of speech grounds, it is illegal to deny the so-called "Armenian genocide," which is not recognized as such by most of the countries in the world.

Earlier, an international alliance of 36 nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) representing 13 countries petitioned the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) about the systematic anti-Muslim actions of Macron-run France.

Prominent NGOs, lawyers and religious bodies called on the OHCHR to act on France’s “breadth of state abuse against Muslims” that has been raging in the country for over two decades. The coalition accuses the French government of violating “a number of basic rights that are protected in legislation that is ratified by Paris.”

The statement also alleged that the French government weaponized "laicite," the French version of secularism, to justify the intrusion of the state in the religious and political practices of Muslims.

"France stands in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. France infringed on freedoms of children, specifically to target Muslim children in violation of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child," the statement added.

The document calls upon the U.N. to ensure that France upholds and enforces the group's Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and its International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) along with every directive on the prohibition of discrimination and racism.

Human rights group Amnesty International said in March that the new regulations "would be a serious attack on rights and freedoms in France."

“Time and again we have seen the French authorities use the vague and ill-defined concept of ‘radicalization’ or ‘radical Islam’ to justify the imposition of measures without valid grounds, which risks leading to discrimination in its application against Muslims and other minority groups,” Amnesty International Europe researcher Marco Perolini said, adding that “this stigmatization must end.”

Turkish press: Turkish military begins to use unmanned ground vehicles

A Turkish-made Acrob IKA (UGV) is seen in this poster shared by the Ministry of National Defense (MSB) on Sept. 29, 2021. (Credit: MSB)

The Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) have started using unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), a statement from the Ministry of National Defense said Wednesday.

“Unmanned ground vehicles, which make it possible to observe and enter areas where it’s not possible to do so in every type of operation, have begun to be used in combat,” the ministry said.

The ministry also attached an infographic for Acrob, a UGV developed by Turkish manufacturer Elektroland Defense.

The image underlined Acrob’s capabilities of maneuvering, climbing over high obstacles, going through water and observation.

The Turkish defense industry has gained worldwide fame in recent years.

Turkish drones rose to worldwide prominence following their deployment in Syria and Libya by the TSK and in Nagorno-Karabakh by Azerbaijan’s army, paving the way for more export deals.

They dominated Bashar Assad regime ground forces during clashes in Idlib province in February-March 2020 with smart ammunition and joint use with Turkish fighter jets that conducted flights over the country’s airspace.

In Nagorno-Karabakh, the Turkish UAVs dealt a heavy blow to Armenian occupying forces. Defense experts later said the swift Baku victory was partially thanks to the use of Turkish and Israeli-made drones.

The Bayraktar TB2 has been sold to several countries, including Ukraine, Qatar, Azerbaijan and Poland. In May, Poland became the first European Union and NATO member state to acquire drones from Turkey.

Saudi Arabia is also said to have been interested in buying Turkish drones. Latvia also hinted that it could be the second EU and NATO member state to acquire Turkish drones. Albania is also interested in striking a deal to procure Bayraktar TB2s.