Yerevan court to hear motion to end prosecution of Kocharyan under Article 300․1

Panorama, Armenia
April 1 2021

The Court of General Jurisdiction in Yerevan, presided over by judge Anna Danibekyan, on Friday will continue hearings in the case of the alleged overthrow of the constitutional order involving Armenia’s second President Robert Kocharyan and three other former top officials.

The court is expected to hear a defense motion to end the criminal prosecution against Kocharyan under Article 300.1 of the Criminal Code, his legal team said in a statement on Thursday. The motion had been filed to the court on March 27.

Earlier last Friday, the Constitutional Court of Armenia ruled that Article 300․1 of the Criminal Code is unconstitutional and invalid, noting that it runs counter to Articles 78 and 79 of the Constitution. 

Newspaper: Armenia ex-President Kocharyan electoral list has surprises

News.am, Armenia
April 1 2021

YEREVAN. – Hraparak daily of Armenia writes: Although there is still no clarity in the political field whether they will go to the snap [parliamentary] elections under the old or the new [electoral] code, some parties are busy with the hard work of compiling the electoral lists.

The toughest casting is being held at [second President] Robert Kocharyan; he has decided to come up with a powerful list to ‘win’ in the elections. Names are given of authoritative people from all walks of life—from businessmen to generals—who may be on Kocharyan's list.

The name of [businessman] Ralph Yirikian, of one of the former directors of the NSS [National Security Service], is circulating. The press also wrote about [ex-defense minister] Seyran Ohanyan and [former CSTO Secretary General] Yuri Khachaturov. Deputy prime minister Armen Gevorgyan, one of the referents of Kocharyan during his presidency, other high-ranking officials will be [on this electoral list].

Negotiations are underway with former Prime Minister Karen Karapetyan. Although, according to some rumors, Karapetyan has said that he would support with everything, but has declined from taking a spot on the list.

It is not ruled out that Artak Tovmasyan “of "Dvin” will join this team, as well as the newly founded party of the people of Syunik [Province], headed by former governor Vahe Hakobyan.

There are rumors that Arpine Hovhannisyan [former National Assembly vice speaker and ex-Minister of Justice] will be on Kocharyan's list—the first woman, number three.

And the leaders of some of the one-man-party parties part of the 17 [opposition parties demanding PM Nikol Pashinyan’s resignation] will take up lower positions [on this list].


Russian MFA: Moscow supports caring attitude towards cultural and religious objects in Nagorno-Karabakh

News.am, Armenia
April 1 2021

Moscow supports a caring attitude towards cultural and religious objects in Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding regions, and this is Moscow’s principled stance. This is what Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Maria Zakharova said during today’s press conference.

“Russia reaffirms the importance of organizing the UNESCO’s mission to the region quickly and is in contact with the sides in regard to each specific case,” she said.

On March 25, 2021, BBC News reported the destruction of an Armenian church in Jrakan (Jebrayil) by Azerbaijani soldiers. There weren’t even ruins of the church. The destruction of the Green Hour Armenian church in Shushi (occupied by the Azerbaijanis) was reported earlier.

Armenian advocates’ report on Armenia President concealing dual citizenship forwarded to Special Investigation Service

News.am, Armenia
April 1 2021

The Prosecutor General’s Office of Armenia has forwarded to the Special Investigation Service the report on crime filed by 53 advocates in regard to the fact that President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian has concealed his dual citizenship, Head of the Public Relations Department of the Prosecutor General’s Office Arevik Khachatryan told Armenian News-NEWS.am today.

Earlier, Armenian News-NEWS.am had presented the content of the report on crime filed by the advocates.

Based on the report, between 2003 and 2012, Armen Sarkissian was a citizen of the United Kingdom for at least 10 years and was elected President of Armenia on March 2, 2018, but hadn’t met the requirement to be a citizen of Armenia for the past six years. Sarkissian could only be elected President of Armenia, if his citizenship had been terminated before March 1, 2012 (to March 1, 2018 – 6 years).

With regard to citizenship, the Chief of Staff of the President of Armenia made a reference to the statement of information provided for by the Armenian legislation which was submitted to the National Assembly during the election of the President.

What is interesting is the letter of the Head of the Passport and Visas Department of the Police of Armenia dated 25 March 2021 by which it was reported that the State Population Register didn’t state any information on President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian being a citizen of another country, including as of March 2, 2018.

The statement of information on Armen Sarkissian being a citizen of Armenia in the past six years was issued for his election taking as a basis the information in the State Population Register and the statement that Armen Sarkissian made in his application that he is not a citizen of another country. In this regard, it should also be mentioned that other regulations for verifying Armenian citizenship are not prescribed by any legal act.

Armenia Civic Council member Tatul Manaseryan: Re-liberation of Shushi is fully realistic

News.am, Armenia
April 1 2021

More and more people are joining the Civic Council established by Arkady Ter-Tadevosyan (Komandos), and this will be ongoing. This is what member of the Civic Council, economist Tatul Manaseryan told reporters today.

He cited the ‘political testament’ of Komandos in which the latter had stated the following: “In order to get out of the difficult situation created at this fatal moment, it is necessary to set up a civic council, the members of which will be Armenian intellectuals and public and political figures trusted by the Armenian people. It is necessary to build a viable and powerful Nation-State through all viable and efficient forces.”

According to Manaseryan, the Civic Council is already in action and supports the consolidation of other forces. “We are certain that the re-liberation of Shushi is fully realistic. I must say that it can be liberated through the military and in other ways, but for that, Armenians need to unite as one. In this sense, the Civic Council has twelve committees, each of which has mobilized its resources, and this will be ongoing,” Manaseryan said.

Armenia ruling party MP explains how citizens will vote during upcoming snap parliamentary elections

News.am, Armenia
April 1 2021

Deputy of the My Step faction of the National Assembly of Armenia Maria Karapetyan posted the following on her Facebook page:

“Dear citizens, during the elections, you will vote for only one political party, not one of the candidates included in the list of the particular political party. You will simply take the ballot indicating the name of your preferred political party and place it in an envelope. However, this doesn’t mean you won’t know who is included in the political party’s list since the lists will be promulgated in advance. This electoral system is referred to as simple proportional.”

Today the National Assembly of Armenia adopted, in the first and second readings, the bill on making amendments and supplements to the “Electoral Code of the Republic of Armenia” Constitutional Law, which proposes to do away with the rating electoral system and introduced the proportional electoral system with closed lists.

As reported earlier, Armenia will hold snap parliamentary elections on June 20, 2021.

Karabakh MP: I don’t believe anything the President says

News.am, Armenia
April 1 2021

People in Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) were sending me letters and calling me on the phone telling me that President Arayik Harutyunyan came to Martuni and continued to state that everyone and the internal traitors are to blame for the war. I don’t know who the internal traitors are. All Armenians know that the traitors are the President and his colleague in Armenia. Who does he want to throw the blame on? This is what deputy of the Justice faction of the National Assembly of Artsakh Metakse Hakobyan told Armenian News-NEWS.am today, touching upon the President’s statement about Karmir Shuka village.

“I visited Karmir Shuka about 12 days ago and saw that it’s not safe there. I myself want Armenians to return and live in their settlements, and we’re doing everything to achieve this. When my fellow deputies and I went to Taghavard village, people were surprised and told us we were the first people who had visited them. I didn’t see that the people were in safety, and on the road, I saw a column of Azerbaijanis who were passing through Karmir Shuka, Spitakashen and Shosh. This is why I don’t believe anything Arayik Harutyunyan says,” the MP said.

Yesterday President of Artsakh Arayik Harutyunyan visited Martuni and several other communities where he also talked about Karmir Shuka village and emphasized that in this stage, in terms of self-establishment, every politician in Armenia is using a false agenda of patriotism and trying to blame Artsakh, stating that the latter is allegedly preparing to make certain transactions.

US Senators ask Biden to recognise Armenian Genocide

ICN – Independent Catholic News

Soldiers round up Armenian civilians 1915

Source: Fides

US Senator Bob Menendez, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, led 37 of his Senate colleagues in requesting the Biden administration join the US Congress in officially recognising the Ottoman Empire's genocide against the Armenian people. The letter reads: "Administrations of both parties have been silent on the truth of the Armenian Genocide. We urge you to break this pattern of complicity by officially recognising that the Armenian Genocide was a genocide."

Aram Hamparian executive director of the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) said in a statement: "President Biden, by virtue of his own strong Senate record and the bipartisan House and Senate resolutions he backed as a candidate, is powerfully positioned to reject Turkey's gag-rule, locking in permanent US government-wide condemnation and commemoration of the Armenian Genocide."

In September 2019 Biden, at that time candidate for the Democratic primary ahead of the 2020 US presidential elections, had called on the United States to recognise "once and for all" as Genocide the "Great Evil" of the massacres perpetrated in 1915 against the Armenian population in the Anatolian Peninsula.

President Donald Trump, Biden's predecessor had dedicated an official message to the planned massacres suffered in the Anatolian Peninsula by the Armenians in 1915, but by avoiding designating these systematic massacres as "Armenian genocide", following the line carried out by its last four presidents, in order not to provoke resentful reactions from Turkey.

In the past, US Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan had used the _expression_ "Armenian Genocide," but then, from George HW Bush to Barack Obama, the _expression_ disappeared from the speeches of White House leaders in their official statements. President Obama, due to Turkish pressure on the US Congress, set aside the promise made during an electoral campaign to recognize the genocidal nature of the massacres suffered in the current Turkish territory by the Armenians more than a century ago.

The new bipartisan initiative of US senators raises the question of the frequent use of the category of "Genocide" in the definition of US geopolitical strategies. It is an option full of concrete and operational implications: in the US system. When the crimes suffered by a community of people in any part of the world are recognized as genocide, the US President is required to implement all political, economic and military options capable of supporting the victims and bringing the culprits to justice.

During the jihadist expansion on the territory of Iraq, in the United States a cartel of 118 organisations and representatives of civil and religious groups ran campaigns to urge federal institutions to recognise as genocide the actions perpetrated by jihadists of the so-called "Islamic State" against all minority religious communities, starting with Christians and Yazidis. The most relevant result of the campaign was the "Iraq and Syria Genocide Relief and Accountability Act", a law signed in December 2018 by President Trump, which qualified as Genocide the series of crimes perpetrated in previous years by jihadist groups on Christians and Yazidis in Iraq and Syria, urging the American administration to prosecute the groups accused as executors of its abuses.

The law was described by some of the guests at the signing ceremony as a vital instrument in ensuring the survival of Christians in Iraq and in saving their community from extinction. Nonetheless, the Chaldean Patriarch Louis Raphael Sako, in a recent interview with Agenzia Fides, repeated that "If there was genocide, it struck all Christians and even more the Yazidis, but also the Shiites and the Sunnis in greater numbers. We must not separate Christians from others, the sufferings of Christians from those of others, because in this way a sectarian mentality is nourished."

Graffiti or homage? Hi-tech imaging sheds light on Holy Sepulchre wall crosses

Hindustan Times, India

<link rel="stylesheet" href=”"/res/css/styles.css?v=51"” type="text/css">

Revered in Christian tradition as the site of Jesus’s crucifixion and burial, Jerusalem's Church of the Holy Sepulchre usually bustles with worshippers and clergy. That has made study of the sacred markings difficult.
READ FULL STORY
Reuters | , Jerusalem
PUBLISHED ON MAR 31, 2021 08:11 PM IST
Father Samuel Aghoyan, the Armenian superior at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre looks up as he stands at the Saint Helena chapel inside the church which is revered in Christian tradition as the site of Jesus' crucifixion and burial, during his interview with Reuters, in Jerusalem's Old City February 24, 2021. Picture taken February 24, 2021. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun(REUTERS)

Crosses etched in mysterious abundance across the walls of Christianity's most sacred church were long assumed to be graffiti, but they may be the work of mediaeval masons paid to carve them by pilgrims, research suggests.

Revered in Christian tradition as the site of Jesus’s crucifixion and burial, Jerusalem's Church of the Holy Sepulchre usually bustles with worshippers and clergy. That has made study of the sacred markings difficult.

But renovations in 2018 at one of its chapels featuring thousands of the close-bunched and hand-engraved crosses gave Israel's Antiquities Authority and Hadassah Academic College Jerusalem an opportunity for research.

In coordination with the Armenian Orthodox Church, which controls the chapel, the scholars used digital cameras and three-dimensional imaging to map out, compare and date the crosses.

"This unique phenomenon always baffled us: Is it graffiti of the pilgrims, or rather, something else?…," said Amit Re'em, Jerusalem regional archaeologist for the Authority.

"We saw that all of them (crosses) have the same depth and even the marking of the mason," he said, provisionally dating them to the 15th century.

"Maybe two or three hand artists made these crosses," Re'em said. "…So it's not graffiti, it's something more organised."

He suggested an intercessionary purpose.

"Let's say that you are an Armenian pilgrim, so you pay something to the priest, you pay something to this special artist and he carved for you, for the benefit of your soul and your relatives' souls, …a special cross in the most sacred place for Christianity on earth," Re'em said.

Father Samuel Aghoyan, the Armenian superior at the Holy Sepulchre, saw benefits to the church from the research, especially as it struggles to emerge from COVID-19 lockdowns‮ ‬and prepares for Easter.

"Now there are no pilgrims here, (but) still their spirit is here, we know, I believe in that," he said.

From Armenia and Azerbaijan, what can Australia learn?

Australia

The nature of warfare is dynamic. It endlessly renews itself to overcome the challenges presented by different terrains, enemies, situations, ideologies and technologies.

Let’s focus on just one of these key areas: technological change. Put simply, the rate of technological change in the 21st century has created dozens of new axes of warfare, many of which are insurmountable by conventional fighting forces.

Barring the cyber and information spheres, there few examples of where technology counts more than in the air. Nowadays, air-fighting is on the brink of a once in a lifetime strategic and technological transformation due to the symbiosis of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles, including suicide craft.

In a conventional sense, this was arguably observed for the first time during the recent Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict, in which Armenia’s conventional fighting forces were challenged – and considerably overwhelmed – by the technologically superior Azeris.

Indeed, Armenia’s expensive conventional weaponry was simply unable to compete on a different military axis, and was thus beaten by cheaper and more replaceable Azeri UAVs. The lesson is simple: no matter how robust one’s conventional army may be, the rate of technological change ensures that units, hardware and strategies are being superseded at an increasing rate – and that it is imperative for modern militaries to diversify their portfolio of resources. So how can Australia learn from this case study?

Firstly, let’s compare the ADF to the military of one of our closest neighbours to provide some perspective. While Australia counts some 80,000 active and reserve defence force personnel, Indonesia (for the sake of comparison) has 400,000 active military personnel bolstered by 400,000 reservists. Meanwhile, Australia’s arsenal of 59 tanks pale in the face of Indonesia’s 300-500 (numbers vary due to source).

Unfortunately for Australia, we are not only numerically disadvantaged, but also technologically. Indonesia acquired their first armed UAVs in 2019, and President Joko Widodo has already expressed his desire to expedite the domestic production of long-range military drones to 2022. While our wheels are in motion, we lag behind our competitors.