BAKU: Protest to be held in NY under slogan `No to Armenian lies’

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
April 7 2007

Protest action to be held in New-York under the slogan `No to Armenian lies’

[ 07 Apr 2007 16:01 ]

Turkish communities in the US will organize protest action under the
slogan `No to Armenian lies’ in famous Times Square in New-York on
the eve of the anniversary of the so-called `Armenian genocide’ on
April 24, APA US bureau reports.

Photos and shots reflecting the Armenian savagery against Khojaly
residents will be demonstrated in the mass protest actions on April
21-22. Representatives of Azerbaijani Diaspora in the US will also
attend the event. /APA/

Armenia to implement results of scientific activity into economy

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
April 7 2007

ARMENIA TO IMPLEMENT RESULTS OF SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY INTO ECONOMY

YEREVAN, April 6. /ARKA/. Armenia’s main scientific task is to
implement results of scientific activity into economy, said President
of Armenia’s National Academy of Sciences presenting his report
during the ANAS annual meeting. He said that it will give possibility
to provide necessary financial support for this sphere.
"The provision on implementing results of scientific activity into
Armenia’s economy is reflected in the concept of scientific
development, and Armenia’s all science divisions, structures and
departments should be directed to that," Martirosyan said.
He said that Armenia is one of the countries in the world, which
science sector is low-financed. "It is necessary to increase the
volume of budget financing," he said.
Martirosyan added that science’s share in the GDP should make 1%
instead of current 0.1% by 2010.
In 2007 it is planned to allocate AMD 5.5bln to the science sector of
Armenia instead of AMD 5.1bln in 2006. Due to that, the wages of
scientists is planned to increase from AMD 28ths up to AMD 44ths.
The average exchange rate of Armenian Dram against U.S. dollar in
2007 state budget will make AMD 357/$1.
$16mln was allocated to Armenia’s science sector in 2006.
Among the participants of the ANAS annual meeting were: Armenia’s
Prime Minister Serge Sargsyan, Parliament Chairman Tigran Torosyan,
Acting Minister of Science and Education Levon Lazarian, as well as
many representatives of science and academy sector. L.M. -0–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Resolution on Armenian genocide risks foreign policy

Chicago Sun-Times
April 7 2007

Resolution on Armenian genocide risks foreign policy

Backlash could compromise Turkey’s role as gateway for supply of U.S.
forces in Iraq

April 7, 2007
BY JOEL J. SPRAYREGEN

Congress is on the verge of inflicting a devastating blow to U.S.
foreign policy. At issue is a resolution introduced in the House of
Representatives that brands as genocide the deaths and deportations
of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire during World War I.
Turkey is the gateway for supply of U.S. forces in Iraq as well as
supplier of basic necessities — food, water, gas, electricity — to
Iraq. Turkey has been a staunch American ally in NATO; Turkish forces
play an important role in Afghanistan.

Passage of the resolution — which Turks see as officially adjudging
them to be a nation of barbarians — will produce popular indignation
that no Turkish government could ignore. As Professor Soner Cagaptay
of Princeton University says, ”This backlash would inevitably
cripple U.S.-Turkish military cooperation.”

The modern Turkish Republic, successor to the Ottoman Empire within
shrunken borders, is the only Muslim country in the Middle East that
maintains a functioning democracy. Turkey borders Iran, Iraq, Syria
and Russia. Passing a self-serving resolution condemning Turks for
horrific things that occurred 90 years ago would alienate an
important ally without achieving anything of substance for the United
States. An American rebuff, added to recent European actions hostile
to Turkey, would only strengthen malign anti-Western Islamist and
nationalist minorities in Turkey.

Armenians contend 1.5 million or more people were systematically
killed between 1915 and 1923. Turks say a far smaller number of
people died, not by deliberate extermination, but as a consequence of
a brutal war in which Armenians were deported because they sided
militarily with invading Russians. There is no doubt that large
numbers of Armenians suffered terrible deaths and deportations;
Muslim civilians were also ravaged.

The weight of opinion outside Turkey has favored Armenian claims. But
Chris Morris, British author of The New Turkey, says: ”Both sides
produce stacks of documents to back up their arguments . . .”
Respected historian Guenter Lewy concludes, ”The primary intent of
the [Ottoman] deportation order was undoubtedly not to eradicate an
entire people but to deny support for the Armenian guerrilla bands
and to remove Armenians from war zones.” The tragic consequences for
Armenian civilians should be remembered. But politicians have no
qualifications to judge Ottoman intentions nine decades ago.

Similar congressional resolutions have failed to pass in recent
years. The reason the current resolution is being pushed by more than
160 House co-sponsors is that the November elections empowered
California Democrats, and there are many Armenian Americans residing
in California and elsewhere who are actively lobbying. They deserve
respect for keeping alive the memory of what happened to their
ancestors, but not at the price of rupturing relations with a key
American ally.

Turkish Americans are too few to lobby effectively. Speaker Nancy
Pelosi, ignoring concerns persuasive to prior House leadership, has
scheduled a rushed vote for this month. Pelosi should ask the
Department of Defense what would happen if Turkey curtailed
co-operation with U.S. forces in the Middle East and Afghanistan.

There is much Turkey can do to prevent congressional resolutions from
becoming a perennial irritant, e.g., tempering anti-American
propaganda in media close to the ruling AKP party and increasing
protection of human rights. Turkey is not improving its image by
cozying up to Hamas terrorists.

But passage of this resolution would inflict a major foreign policy
disaster on America by rupturing relations with a country vital to
execution of our foreign policy.

CChicago lawyer Joel J. Sprayregen participates annually in a
symposium in Istanbul to advance civil society in Turkey.

ANKARA: If only she says something…

New Anatolian, Turkey
April 7 2007

If only she says something…

Gunduz Aktan
07 April 2007

The judgment of the International Court of Justice dated February 26
once again showed that the Armenians have no legal thesis. In its
decision, the Court applied the genocide definition in the Article 2
of the Genocide Convention without broadening its scope. For the
commission of genocide, it made a condition that there should be a
"special intent to destroy" one group "as such," in other words
killing or wounding the group members for no reason other than they
belong to that group. And it excluded the crimes perpetrated within
the framework of ethnic cleansing from the scope of genocide.

Even though Turkey knew that such was the law, it advocated the
genocide thesis in 1992 in order to protect the Bosnians who were
then abandoned by the international community and to make pressure on
the Serbians. However, we soon discovered that the Serbs were killing
the Bosnians not only for ethnic cleansing. While massacring them the
Serbs were accusing the Bosnians of being "Ottomans or Turks." This
racist hatred constituted the motive behind the special intent to
destroy, necessary for genocide. In other words, the Serbs were
committing genocide. The Bosnians did not use this argument at the
Court and they lost the case.

In his article in Yeni Safak on March 7, Kursat Bumin criticizes the
information I had given in my previous columns as comments based
solely on "raison d’etat." How can a judgment of the court, whose
judges come from states, who try the states, according to the laws
made by the states be interpreted in another way?

If Mr. Bumin wants to abstract the Armenian incidents from state
affairs and approach the problem purely from the humanitarian
standpoint, then he should exclude the Ottoman State from his
comments and include the Turks who were massacred by the Armenians.
Is he ready for this?

In the book entitled "Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey" written
by the great genocide scholar Guenter Lewy and in Lieutenant Colonel
Edward J. Erickson’s research entitled "Enemies Within," it is proven
in details that the Special Organization (Teskilat-i Mahsusa) was not
involved "as a state organ" in the relocation of the Armenians. The
objection Mr. Bumin makes to this point means that he implicitly
recognizes the Armenian genocide.

In her article in Radikal Ýki newspaper on March 11, Ms Ayse Hur
claims that the parts I’ve translated from the famous book of Prof.
William Shabas on genocide and international law is inaccurate.

The legal aspect is the weak point in the Armenian allegations. Ms.
Hur is trying to bolster the morale of the genocide supporters with
the tactics of saying "something," even if not substantive.

It is good that Ms Hur included my Turkish translation from Shabas
and the original text in English in her article. Even a cursory look
at the texts reveals that there is no mistake in the translation. The
additions in brackets of course belong to me. Using brackets to this
end is a regular practice.

The Armenian genocide defenders who read Shabas for the first time
are pleased that the author qualifies the 1915 incidents as genocide.
This is natural since Shabas received all information concerning the
issue from the books by Dadrian. He has not read even one book from
the Turkish side. Ironically, the legal analyses of Shabas show that
these incidents are not genocide.

The references made by Ms Hur to Lemkin aim at defending the Armenian
genocide thesis. Lemkin also described the Armenian incidents as
genocide. However, Lemkin listed many genocide types such as
economic, cultural etc. The UN negotiating committee made a rigorous
definition on genocide. Despite all the objections by Lemkin, it
excluded the "political" groups, which struggle for political aims,
from the definition in article 2 and inserted the term "as such" to
express racist motive behind the intent to destroy a group. In order
to understand what I say, the records of the "travaux preparatoires"
should be read.

At the panel of the Turkish Bars’ Union, which was also mentioned by
Ms Hur, Shabas said in his reply to my question that neither the
prosecutors nor the lawyers used the racial hatred as the necessary
motive for special intent to destroy at the International Criminal
Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).

During the joint studies which we have conducted under the guidance
of Prof. Vamik Volkan at the Virginia University in 1991, we came to
know that racism was the force behind the special intent to destroy.
We did not need to wait for the book by Shabas.

This view on racism as motive, which we have been defending for
years, is now elaborated by philosophers such as Raimond Gaita
(Genocide and Human Rights, edited by John K. Roth, Palgrave, 2005).

Those who, like Ayse Hur, allege the Armenian incidents of 1915-16 to
be genocide according to law remain silent when it comes to the
solution through adjudication or arbitration. I wonder why?

BAKU: `With More Election Games Armenians Try to Attracts Attention’

Ïðàî ûáîðà, Azerbaijan
Democratic Azerbaijan
April 7 2007

Akif Nagi: `With One More Game of Elections Armenian Separatists Try
to Attracts World’s Attention’
07.04.2007

Holding of the so-called `presidential elections’ on the territory of
Nagorni Garabagh of Azerbaijan by Armenian separatists is their one
more false propaganda for self show. Chairman of Organization of
Garabagh liberation, Akif Nagi, declared it on Wednesday.
He underlined that Armenian separatists want to attract world’s
attention once again with the help of elections. Chairman of
Organization of Garabagh Liberation also said that such kind of false
and contradicting to international rules actions should be taken as
ones coming from Armenian state.
`That is why Azerbaijan should refuse from talks with Armenia on
peace regulation of Garabagh conflict. Azerbaijani state shouldn’t
relax but we should liberate our lands from occupation through
military way’, chairman stated.
The so-called regime of Armenian separatists decided to hold
`presidential elections’ on July 19 on the territory of Nagorni
Garabagh of Azerbaijan.

Notes on Time: The Recent Music of Tigran Mansurian

Brooklyn Rail, NY
April 7 2007

Notes on Time: The Recent Music of Tigran Mansurian

by Alan Lockwood

Before ECM began releasing Tigran Mansurian’s music in 2003, the
Armenian composer’s finely etched, mid-period chamber music might be
found on the U.K.’s Megadisc, with violin and cello concertos dating
back to the seventies on the German label Orfeo. Then there was the
pared, startling score for Sergei Paradjanov’s 1969 feast of
cinematic poetry, The Color of Pomegranates. With last year’s a
cappella choral masterwork Ars Poetica, recorded in the sonorous
Saghmosavank monastery, a transformation had come full pass, with
sterling recent chamber pieces joining new recordings of the violin
concerto’s haunting themes and of arch string quartets, all composed
in the early eighties. The second of Poetica_’s `Three Autumn Songs,’
`Japanese Tankas,’ dawns with hushed female voices and then adds
bleak ballast with the male voices, welling to a naked momentous peak
and a wisp of a protracted unison exit, with that gentle, steely
bravura echoed to conclude `And Silence Descends,’ the work’s
thirteen-minute denouement. _Poetica sets to music the once-banned
verse of Yeghishe Charents, the Stalin-era casualty who `brought the
rhythmical privileges of Western poetry in to the philosophies of
Eastern poetry,’ the composer said through a translator from Los
Angeles. Preparations were underway there for an ambitious late April
festival of his music including Poetica and the concerto `…and then I
was in time again,’ written for violist Kim Kashkashian and inspired
by Quentin Compson from Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury.

Hayren, the first of ECM’s four Mansurian offerings, was released
under Kashkashian’s name. Titled for the centuries-old Armenian
poetic style, it exhibits the renowned violist’s penetrating accuracy
of pitch and immensity of feel, teamed with Mansurian and the
incisive percussion battery of Robin Schulkowsky on the composer’s
transcriptions from songs of Komitas, the choirmaster and
musicologist who notated folk traditions that might otherwise have
been extinguished in the 1915-17 Armenian genocide, and whose work
garnered praise from Debussy. Mansurian’s quavering voice wends a
beleaguered labor of love; by the time he reaches the delicately
honed `Hoy, Nazan’ and `Tsirani Tsar,’ the project could sound like
the aural equivalent of eyeing indecipherable ancient glyphs – or could
resound with a noble, lingering mystique. By bracketing Komitas’s
gems with adventuresome duets for Kashkashian and Schulkowsky, Hayren
displays Mansurian’s remarkable range: Armenian cultural depths and
the synthesis, in his late-sixties, of a lauded Soviet-system artist
who has achieved the latitude and collaborative firepower to be
generating his most essential music.

In speaking of Hayren_’s Komitas songs, Mansurian suggested that
bridge between contemporary musical concerns and traditions from the
mountainous, transcontinental land between the Black and Caspian
seas: `Those songs are from a thousand years ago, when they had no
idea of notation or measures. It’s important that anybody dealing
with that music not just work with notes and measures, but rather
work to feel the freedom of the sound, which is very fragile, and can
collapse. This is most important in our relationship to music: to
feel the freedom [that comes] from the sounds.’ And _Poetica,
composed through the late 1990s to Charents’ impassioned, harrowing
poems, provides another window into Mansurian’s sound world: the
musical emissions of words. Armenian, an Indo-European language that
is one of the world’s oldest, resounds with consonant combinations,
and the composer’s favorite poet `revitalized its internal breathing
that had been forgotten. He brought all these different tonalities
from the same letters back in – to give an example, the letter g has
three different tones [each of which Mansurian demonstrated, via long
distance]. What attracted me was that Charents went back to medieval
Armenian poetry, when no poem was written without a very firm
foundation. His poetry rivals those foundations, which made my job
easier. He plays with the words, and I just continued playing.’

Mansurian was born in Beirut in 1939; his grandmother had escaped
from the Turkish military onslaught to Aleppo, Syria, where she
succumbed to malnutrition and his months-old mother was saved by an
American missionary. (U.S. activists of that era were stirred by
Armenia’s plight, though today’s calls compelling Turkey to
acknowledge the twentieth century’s first genocide are thwarted in
Congress by NATO alliances.) Mansurian’s family repatriated in what
proved to be a Stalinist recruiting ploy. `I went from a French
Catholic school in Beirut to a provincial mining town in 1947,’ where
he found himself the black sheep, he said. Within a decade, the
Mansurians were in Yerevan, Armenia’s capital, and his professional
life in music commenced.

While scoring The Color of Pomegranates (after being awarded first
prizes in Moscow’s All-Union competitions in 1966 and ’68), his
aptitude for the unconventional came to the fore. Director
Paradjanov, also of Armenian heritage, had won international
accolades with his stylized Ukrainian flamethrower Shadows of
Forgotten Ancestors, along with scrutiny at home that would land him
a five-year gulag sentence after Pomegranates. `I was thirty years
old when I was hired to write music for that film,’ Mansurian
recalled. `[Paradjanov] was in his mid-forties, and one of the most
unique people I’ve ever come across.’ Available as a Kino DVD,
Pomegranates evokes the life of troubadour Sayat Nova, medieval
Armenia’s great voice of love and loss; Paradjanov festooned his
tapestry of sumptuous, silent tableaux with Mansurian’s flurrying
srings (double-reed flutes), battering drums, and chaotic kamanchas
(spiked fiddles), layered into one of cinema’s sonic triumphs. `When
I was scoring that movie, it had to be pure feeling; any sort of
logic or meaning had to be out of it. It was some sort of energetic
thing: one energy going to another energy. The music is not about the
tree or the branch, it’s about the sap.’

Composed in 1985, with glasnost underway, Mansurian’s Five Bagatelles
(on the Megadisc compilation) delve into tone clusters and atonal
lines, and ECM’s quartet recording can suggest Shostakovich’s replete
detail, though where the Russian wielded mordant wit, Mansurian’s
grace rings both limpid and ominous, recalling the air of
experimental mid-century piano pieces by Alan Hovhaness. Then ten
years ago, `when Kim asked me to write a piece for viola, I jumped on
the opportunity like a lion,’ having long imagined setting The Sound
and the Fury. `Faulkner’s relationship with time was where I always
got my strength. A lot of my colleagues would just do the same
things – their times were the Soviet times. The phrase `…and I was in
time again…’ (from Quentin Compson’s opening line, as is The Shadow
of the Sash, the title of a mid-1990s chamber work) sounds to me like
a rebellious thought against time. When I say `time,’ I’m talking of
a philosophical category, a relative category.’ Citing fifth-century
philosopher David Anhaght, Mansurian said `the symbol of time among
the numbers is seven, which is also the symbol of virginity, and the
concerto is written along the number seven, about virgin time, which
is Quentin’s issue. When I wrote it, I chose viola because it is the
most mystical instrument there is.’

Annual remembrance of the Armenian genocide occurs on April 24, and
three Mansurian concerts highlight the L.A. commemoration. After the
evening-length Ars Poetica, a night of chamber music includes Agnus
Dei _for clarinet, violin, cello, and piano, premiered last year in
Germany, and the third string quartet. On April 25, Kim Kashkashian
plays _`…and then I was in time again’ during an orchestral evening.
In a phone interview, American-born Kashkashian recalled her
introduction to Mansurian. `We were in his apartment, and he sang
songs for me,’ she said. `Armenia is a small country and with anyone
whose name ends in `ian,’ as I am on their radar, they are on my
radar. But there were also affinities of aesthetic and ethics when
Tigran and I met, and we were both very interested in the Komitas
transcriptions. We had many starting points, and that work
continues.’

Last year, violist Ara Gregorian and the ensemble Concertante
approached Mansurian to commission what Gregorian termed `a cross
between a solo piece for each instrumentalist, and a piece for the
sextet.’ Gregorian began studying ECM’s releases and found Confessing
with Faith, written for Kashkashian and the Hilliard Ensemble, `an
unbelievable piece, in the way he used the viola as a singing and
expressive voice, played against the vocal quartet.’ The new work,
Con Anima, was played at Merkin in late March. The second violin
concerto, Four Serious Songs, premiered in Sweden in January and is
to be played during the L.A. events. It is the likely centerpiece of
ECM’s next release, as the label samples Mansurian’s vivid oeuvre,
and documents his current work.

The U.S. premiere of Agnus Dei is April 6 at Carnegie’s Weill Recital
Hall, and on May 10 the Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center
presents the New York premiere of Duo for Viola and Percussion.

sic/notes-on-time-the-recent

http://www.brooklynrail.org/2007/4/mu

How the media missed genocide

How the media missed genocide TheStar.com – opinion – How the media missed
genocide
April 07, 2007
John Honderich
BUTARE, RWANDA

Today is Genocide Memorial Day in Rwanda, exactly 13 years to the day
since the onset of one of the most brutal periods of the 20th century.

It is thought that close to 1 million Rwandans – including
three-quarters of the entire Tutsi population – were systematically
murdered within the span of 100 days.

This was no civil war, no mistake. Rather it was a deliberate and
methodical ethnic cleansing executed at a rate almost impossible to
fathom.

And in the first month, the world’s media missed the real story.

Missed it badly.

Search the files, as I did, and you will find most newspapers,
including the Star, were replete with stories of the horror that was
unfolding. Indeed, we ran 152 stories in the 100 days.

And a month into the killings, a few journalists, including the Star’s
Pulitzer-winning journalist Paul Watson, began to stitch together
pieces of the real story behind the slaughter.

For a month, though, this tragedy was portrayed as yet another bloody
civil war between two traditional tribal enemies – not a deliberate
genocide.

How could this happen? How could the world’s media miss a genocide?
And even more troubling, could it happen again?

These questions haunted me as I visited this surprisingly enchanting
and stunning country for the first time.

As editor of the Star at that time, I had ultimate responsibility for
the paper’s editorial coverage. And the notion that we weren’t aware
of one ofthe century’s worst episodes doesn’t sit well, as it wouldn’t
with any experienced editor.

After all, at the very same time, the world’s media were documenting
in detail the ethnic cleansing being perpetrated in Bosnia. Those
collective stories brought about a multinational response, just as
they had in Somalia.

Yet in Rwanda, the United Nations actually voted to decrease its
peacekeeping forces from 2,500 to a few hundred.

To the chagrin of Canadian Gen. Romeo D’Allaire and others, the world
was simply turning a blind eye to Rwanda – in large part because the
real story had yet to be told.

In short, we failed Rwanda, for which I will be forever remorseful.

In his new book, The Media and the Rwanda Genocide, former Toronto
Star reporter Allan Thompson provides compelling commentary on the
trail of hate literature and diabolical pre-planning that culminated
in the genocide.

Indeed, three Rwandan so-called journalists were actually indicted and
convicted of inciting genocide by the International Criminal Tribunal
for Rwanda In other words, if reporters had cared to look, the
evidence was all there to realize that something horrific was about to
unfold.

Why didn’t we see it?
In retrospect, much is made of the fact that most of the world’s media
were focused at the very same time on the election in South Africa,
where Nelson Mandela was coming to power. In fact, the Star had two
reporters there.

Others speak of the concentration of attention on Bosnia.

Yet this analysis seems based on the unspoken premise that both the
world and the media were incapable of absorbing the notion that a
genocide was taking place in Africa at the same time as Mandela was
being elected and the Bosnia conflict was raging.

On reflection, it seems the fundamental answer lies somewhere else.

First, Rwanda was too poor for anyone in the West to care.

Second, I hearken back to the comment of Kofi Annan, later UN
secretary-general, who remarked that many Western nations were
reticent to intervene in Rwanda because they didn’t feel a "kinship"
with Africans.

Translation: Who cares about feuding blacks in Africa anyway.

Could such a story be missed again?
In the past 13 years, the number of correspondents stationed in Africa
has dropped significantly.

Virtually every analysis of Western media shows a decline of reportage
on Africa. For example, ABC’s Evening News spent just 11 minutes
throughout all of 2006 reporting on Darfur.

It seems, quite frankly, that media interest in Africa is on the
wane. And what stories appear invariably centre on AIDS, poverty or
corruption.

Any visitor to Rwanda is struck by the number of memorials to the
genocide that carry the ever-present message "Never Again." Can the
same be said of the media missing another such story on this
continent?

Based on what I’ve read and seen, I’m far from confident. Which, as a
former editor, troubles me profoundly.

John Honderich is a former publisher of the Star.

Political Landscape: Push for Genocide Bill

Burbank Leader, CA
April 7 2007

POLITICAL LANDSCAPE:
Push for genocide bill

The California State Senate and Assembly will vote on Monday on
whether to approve Joint Resolution 15, which would designate April
24 as California Day of Remembrance for the Armenian Genocide of
1915-1923.

Assemblyman Paul Krekorian, who represents Glendale and Burbank,
introduced the bill in February. It was co-authored by Assemblyman
Anthony Portantino and state Sen. Jack Scott, who represents Glendale
and Burbank.

In addition to designating an annual day of remembrance in
California, the bill would put pressure on the federal government to
do the same, Krekorian said.

Part of the resolution calls for Congress and the president to
recognize the Armenian genocide as a matter of policy, Krekorian
said. Once the resolution passes, the full text of it will be sent to
every member of the California Congressional delegation, as well as
the president and the Turkish ambassador to the United States.

As a matter of policy, the United States Department of State does not
officially recognize the Armenian genocide.

"As a community, we’ve been promised U.S. recognition of the Armenian
genocide so many times in the past," Krekorian said.

"Republicans and Democrats both have failed to do so once they got in
office."

US backs genocide tribunal

ational/index.php
US backs genocide tribunal

>From Ker Munthit in Phnom Penh

Sunday Herald, UK –
April, 07, 2007
nternational/display.var.1315248.0.0.php#comments_ form

A SENIOR American official urged Cambodian and foreign judges
yesterday to put aside their squabble over legal fees and move forward
with the much-delayed Khmer Rouge genocide tribunal. "The Khmer Rouge
tribunal is really the opportunity for Cambodia to show the
international community how far it has advanced," said Eric G John,
the US deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific
affairs. "And it would be a shame not to be able to show how far it’s
advanced by letting this tribunal get hung up on what is a relatively
down-in-the-weeds monetary issue," he said at the end of a four-day
visit to Cambodia.

On Friday, Cambodian judges for the UN-backed genocide tribunal blamed
their international peers for delaying the trials, which were due to
start this year.

Foreign judges decided earlier this week to boycott an April 30
meeting meant to adopt rules that will guide the trials. Their
decision was prompted by the refusal of the Cambodian Bar Association
to reverse a decision to impose high legal fees on foreign lawyers
wishing to serve at the tribunal.

The foreign judges have described the $4900 (£2500) charge as
prohibitive and said it would allow the accused to argue that they
have not been afforded the right to have counsel of their choice, in
breach of international agreements on civil and political rights.

The Cambodian judges said, in a statement on Friday, they regretted
the foreign judges’ decision, which "would further delay the process
of the court".

Many fear that internal disputes could delay efforts to bring the
Khmer Rouge’s few surviving leaders to trial for crimes against
humanity for the deaths of about 1.7 million people during the group’s
1975-79 rule.

http://www.sundayherald.com/international/shintern
http://www.sundayherald.com/international/shi

Words anger community: Group alleges intolerant comments about ARS

Burbank Leader, CA
April 7 2007

Words anger community

Group alleges intolerant comments were made at city committee
meetings about name and goals of Armenian Relief Society.

By Chris Wiebe

CITY HALL – A dozen Armenian community members voiced their outrage
Tuesday at a City Council meeting over anti-Armenian remarks
allegedly made during two Community Development Goals Committee
meetings.

The speakers urged the council to take action related to accusations
that members of the goals committee – which makes recommendations
regarding public funding from nonprofit organizations – joked during
Feb. 28 and March 7 meetings that the Armenian Relief Society would
be more likely to receive public money if the organization dropped
"Armenian" from its name. The society provides assistance to recent
immigrants and refugees from foreign countries, including Armenia,
Iraq, Iran and Russia.

Speakers said that the offensive comments were followed by some
laughter in the room.

"It saddens me that myself, as well as everybody here, has to bring
to your attention that there were … a couple members who made several
intolerant statements," said Arbi Ohanian, chairman of the Armenian
National Committee Burbank Chapter. "The part that I find
particularly disturbing is that this bigoted approach is coming from
people who are appointed and people who are representatives of our
city government."

Though there is no written transcript or audio recording of the
meeting in question, grants coordinator Mas Toshinaga – who oversees
goals committee meetings – confirmed that comments were made
regarding the benefits of a name change for the nonprofit
organization.

But the comments were not voiced with the underlying negative meaning
that was represented at Tuesday’s council meeting on, he added.

"It’s not that the comments didn’t occur," he said. "It’s that they
didn’t occur to the extent that they were mentioned at the council
meeting."

After hearing the allegations, council members directed city staffers
to gather information about the incident, and apologized to the
Armenian community members in attendance, proposing the possibility
of sensitivity training for committee members.

"Although I was not there, if these things were said, we owe you an
apology – the community owes you an apology," Mayor Todd Campbell
said. "And I would beg you not to change your name. I think you
should be proud of your name."

The majority of the members of the goals committee reacted to the
allegations with disbelief at a meeting on Wednesday.

Committee Chairman Kirk Bowren said that while it was true that a
question was asked about whether the Armenian Relief Society serves
other populations in addition to Armenians, there was no insinuation
that the organization should change their name if they wanted
funding.

The council’s behavior on Tuesday was the "equivalent of throwing the
committee under the bus" to provide a "quick solution," he said.

But that sentiment was not unanimously shared.

"I don’t believe that the comments made by certain committee members
were appropriate comments," committee member Annie Hovanessian said.

Grant funding for the Armenian Relief Society is often scaled back
during community grant disbursements, due, in part, to concerns that
public money should not be used to support organizations that are
identified with a specific ethnicity, said Mourad Topalian, a former
Armenian National Committee chairman.

"It’s not because I don’t believe the Armenian Relief Society isn’t
doing great work…. Personally I believe that using public funds we
need to make sure that the focus of the agency we help is really
broad-based and inviting to everybody," Councilman Dave Golonski said
on Tuesday.

"And when we have an organization that’s primarily formed around a
religious … or an ethnic group, I’m going to have a really hard time
to support them."

Topalian told the council that the relief society has always served
clients who are not Armenian. In fact, more than 50% of its clients
are non-Armenians, he said.