Turkey Pressures France Over Armenia Genocide Bill

Turkey Pressures France Over Armenia Genocide Bill

Reuters, UK
Oct 6 2006

Turkey told France on Friday a draft bill that would punish anyone
denying Armenian genocide during World War One would seriously damage
bilateral economic and political ties.

The French parliament is due to debate the bill, proposed by the
Socialist opposition, on October 12.

"Approval of the law will have very negative effects on economic
ties," Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesman Namik Tan told a weekly
news briefing. "There have been important investments between Turkey
and France through history. With this decision these investments,
built up over years, will be ruined in one (parliamentary) session.
France will, in a manner of speaking, lose Turkey."

Though the conservative majority in France’s parliament opposes the
bill, Turkey fears many opponents will not vote against it for fear of
upsetting France’s 400,000-strong Armenian diaspora ahead of elections
next year.

Tan said Turkey, too, faces presidential and parliamentary elections
in 2007. "The people of Turkey will perceive this development as a
hostile attitude on the part of France," he said. "This draft will
deliver a heavy blow to bilateral relations and to the momentum
previously achieved."

Turkey’s president, Ahmet Necdet Sezer, sent a letter this week to
French President Jacques Chirac on the issue and Prime Minister Tayyip
Erdogan will discuss the problem on Saturday with French businessmen
in Istanbul, Tan said. A delegation of Turkish lawmakers also warned
of harm to French trade during a visit to Paris earlier this week.

France, which has already passed a law recognizing the 1915 massacre
as genocide, had 4.55 billion euros ($5.9 billion) of exports to
Turkey last year, French Trade Ministry data show.

Turkey is stinging from comments by Chirac last weekend in the Armenian
capital Yerevan that Ankara must recognize the Armenian massacres as
genocide before joining the European Union. Turkey began EU entry talks
last year, though is not expected to join for many years. Recognition
of the Armenian genocide is not a condition of its EU membership,
though some other EU politicians apart from Chirac want to make it one.

Ankara says it is ironic that France is preparing to punish those who
express a particular view of history at a time when Turkey is under
heavy EU pressure to change some of its own laws which are viewed as
restricting freedom of expression.

Last week, Ankara reacted angrily to news that two Dutch political
parties had dropped three election candidates, all of Turkish origin,
for denying the Armenian genocide. The Netherlands, like the European
Parliament and some other countries, has urged Turkey to recognize
the genocide claims.

BAKU: Azerbaijan’s MFA Appreciates Today`s Consultations between FMs

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
Oct 6 2006

Azerbaijan`s Foreign Ministry Appreciates Today`s Consultations
between Foreign Ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia with a Careful
Optimism

Source: Trend
Author: E. Husseynov

06.10.2006

Azerbaijan`s Foreign Ministry appreciates the consolations between
the Heads of the Foreign Offices of Azerbaijan and Armenia being held
in Moscow today with a careful optimism, Tahir Taghizadeh, Chief of
the Press and Information Policy Department of Azerbaijan`s Foreign
Office told Trend today.

According to him, the discussions in Moscow started with the separate
meetings between Azerbaijan`s Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov and
his Armenian counterpart Vardan Oskanyan with Russian Foreign
Minister Sergey Ivanov, and then continued by the meetings with the
Co-Chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group. Then, the mediators and the
Foreign Ministers held common "long and wide discussions". "During
the meetings, all the issues that are at the table of negotiations
now were in the limelight of the discussion. "New approaches" were
considered as well", told Mr. Taghizadeh.

As results of the discussions, it was decided to hold the next
meeting between the Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan in
Paris on October 24, 2006.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Turkish Candidate Forced to Recognize Alleged Armenian Genoc

Zaman Online, Turkey
Oct 6 2006

Turkish Candidate Forced to Recognize Alleged Armenian Genocide

By Basri Dogan, Cihan News Agency, Amsterdam
Friday, October 06, 2006
zaman.com

Nebahat Albayrak, in second position on the list of the main opposition
Labour Party (PvdA) candidates, has recognized the so-called Armenian
genocide.

After the main Dutch parties removed three Turkish candidates from
their electoral lists, Albayrak said she backed the parliamentary
motion describing the deaths as genocide, in an interview with the
analysis magazine HP/De Tijd, adding that the form of its occurrence
needs to be investigated.

Albayrak, who has served in the parliament since 1998, in her previous
statements said the jurists would determine the use of "genocide"
in response to the Armenian Diaspora’s claims, and avoided using the
definition in her interviews.

The media strongly criticized Albayrak for being indecisive.

Meanwhile, Turkish candidates Ayhan Tonca , Osman Elmaci (CDA)
and Erdinc Sacan (PvdA) were removed from the election list for the
general elections.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Blocher insists on revised anti:racism law

Blocher insists on revised anti:racism law

SwissInfo, Switzerland
Neue Zurcher Zeitung
Oct 6 2006

Swiss Justice Minister Christoph Blocher says he is intent on revising
Switzerland’s anti:racism law, confirming comments he made in Turkey
earlier this week.

Blocher’s original remarks, made in Ankara, caused an uproar in
Switzerland among politicians and the media. The cabinet is to discuss
the minister’s statement soon.

Speaking in Zurich on Friday, Blocher said he said he was surprised by
the criticism he faced back home after making his comments. He added
that what bothered him in the legislation was the "tense relationship"
between freedom of speech and anti:racism legislation.

Freedom of expression was essential to democracy, affirmed the
minister. "I want people to be able to express themselves in
Switzerland, even if their opinion doesn’t appeal to everyone,"
he added.

During his trip to Turkey, Blocher had remarked that part of the
anti:racism law : adopted in 1994 and including sections aimed
at preventing revisionist views about the Holocaust : gave him a
"headache".

The law has led to investigations against two Turks, including a
historian, in Switzerland for allegedly denying the 1915 Armenian
massacre.

Blocher said a working group at his ministry was re:examining the law,
in particular article 261bis, adding that it was up to the government,
parliament and possibly the population, to decide on any changes.

Blocher said on Friday that he had not many any promises to the
Turkish government on the matter.

Armenians say around 1.8 million of their people were killed in the
massacre. Turkey disputes this, putting the figure closer to 200,000.

Under Swiss law any act of denying, belittling or justifying genocide
is a violation of the country’s anti:racism legislation.

Storm of protest Blocher’s comments unleashed a storm of protest in
Switzerland. On Thursday Interior Minister Pascal Couchepin said that
the justice minister’s remarks were "unacceptable".

For his part, President Moritz Leuenberger said he was surprised,
adding that the cabinet would discuss the issues arising from
Blocher’s comments.

Three of the main political parties in government have also condemned
the remarks. Blocher’s own rightwing Swiss People’s Party has so far
declined to comment.

However, the House of Representatives, which has just ended its autumn
parliamentary session, has decided against debating on the issue.

Several political commentators have called the comments provocative
and have questioned whether the anti:racism law, voted on by the
population, could be changed.

Marcel Niggli, professor of law of Fribourg University, told swissinfo
that it was strange that Blocher should have made the remarks during
a trip abroad and that he should have defended and not criticised
the law.

Blocher said that on the whole the trip has been positive and that
his Turkish counterpart Cemil Cicek had assured him that he was ready
to create a commission made up of historians from different countries
that would have access to Turkish and Armenian archives.

swissinfo with agencies

The folly of dangerous and foolish patriotism

The Age, Australia
Oct 6 2006

The folly of dangerous and foolish patriotism
By Tony Coady
October 7, 2006

Samuel Johnson famously declared that patriotism was the
last refuge of the scoundrel, but the American satirist Ambrose
Bierce may have been closer to the mark when he said that it was the
first. In any case, the fog of patriotic fervour now lies so heavy on
the Australian political landscape that it is necessary to clear some
of it away lest we lose direction entirely.

Attachment to the good habits and institutions of one’s country and a
modest pride in the genuine achievements of one’s co-nationals is a
commendable attitude, capable of forging ties and cementing community
feeling. But patriotism has a strong tendency to go beyond this. The
slogan, "My country, right or wrong" is palpably absurd, but the more
seductive, though equally foolish, idea is that my country can
actually do no wrong, or, at any rate, no serious wrong. The emotions
of patriotism all too often blind us to the moral crimes and follies
that "we" have committed and can again commit. When this is combined
with the political advantages of populism, the mixture can be lethal.
It is not only scoundrels who misuse patriotism; the foolish and
opportunistic also do it.

Our politicians are falling over themselves to reach the peak of
Patriot Hill. They vie with each other to make new and more dramatic
proposals for pulling the rest of us into line with some opaque
vision of Australian values. The proposals range from the
conspicuously silly, such a Kim Beazley’s visa pledge to Aussie
values for tourists to the downright unpleasant, such as Andrew
Robb’s proposal to force migrants to wait four years for citizenship
instead of the present two. There is even a whiff of it in Julie
Bishop’s call for a common national school curriculum designed to
fend off Marxist, feminist and even (God help us!) Maoist
interpretations apparently being foisted on our unsuspecting Aussie
kids by ideologues in state education bureaucracies.

Much of this combines exaggerated fear with extravagant attachment to
a comforting fantasy of a stereotypical Australia. The fantasy is
supposed to protect us from the fear. The fear itself is partly a
genuine if overwrought fear of terrorist acts, and partly a formless
dread of unusual foreigners, especially, nowadays, Muslims.

I remember when Australian patriotism used to be a quiet and modest
affair. The 1950s that our Prime Minister is so fond of was actually
a time when loud affectations of "Aussie values", condemnations of
"anti-Australian behaviour", and indulgence in flag-worship would
have been greeted with astonishment and scorn. I can only hope that
some of that earthy, cynical realism remains in our make-up, but
decades of exploitative advertising ("C’mon Aussie, c’mon") and
imitation of the most sentimental elements in American culture have
undoubtedly had their effect. The idea that respect for law, regard
for justice ("fair go"), and concern for women’s rights somehow
flourish distinctively here ("Aussie values") and languish everywhere
else is of course nonsense, but that is the impression regularly
conveyed by many of our political leaders, and reinforced in much of
the media.

The Steve Irwin phenomenon is instructive. His death was sad and
shocking, but the hysterical sentimentality of the media reactions to
it, and the casting of Irwin as a heroic embodiment of Aussie-ness
were bizarre. Irwin’s high-voltage buffoonery and loud, extroverted,
continuous talking are quite unusual characteristics in this country.
It is indicative of the Prime Minister’s tin ear for Australian
dialect that he should have described Irwin as a "larrikin" when the
more accurate colloquialism would have been "bit of a ratbag". In
fact, the crocodile man was better known and more loved in America
than Australia, which may explain some of the Prime Minister’s
infatuation with his image.

The really impressive thing about the celebration of Irwin’s life was
not the media hyperbole, the politicians’ gushing, or the
professional sincerity of various celebrity actors. No, it was the
quiet dignity of his family, especially his father, whose brief
speech was understated and genuinely moving. The family’s rejection
of the absurd offer of a state funeral injected a rare dose of common
sense into the aftermath of Irwin’s sad death.

The dangers of patriotism have just been dramatically illustrated by
the recent criminal indictment in Turkey of the novelist Elif Shafak
for having insulted "Turkishness". Her alleged crime consisted in
writing a novel that explores the dark secret of Turkish crimes
against Armenians at the end of the Ottoman Empire when thousands of
Armenians were massacred in an outrageous ethnic cleansing. We are
still some way from criminalising criticism of our past (and to the
credit of the Turkish courts, she was acquitted) but the price of
massive self-deception and manipulated sentiment so often inherent in
the patriotic voice is very high. We need to confront our urgent
problems calmly, rationally and with an eye to empirical facts and
universal values. Patriotic posturing is at best a distraction, and
at worst a dangerous folly.

Tony Coady is professorial fellow at the Centre for Applied
Philosophy and Public Ethics at Melbourne University.

The Steve Irwin phenomenon is instructive. His death was sad and
shocking, but the hysterical sentimentality of the media reactions to
it, and the casting of Irwin as a heroic embodiment of Aussie-ness
were bizarre. Irwin’s high-voltage buffoonery and loud, extroverted,
continuous talking are quite unusual characteristics in this country.
It is indicative of the Prime Minister’s tin ear for Australian
dialect that he should have described Irwin as a "larrikin" when the
more accurate colloquialism would have been "bit of a ratbag". In
fact, the crocodile man was better known and more loved in America
than Australia, which may explain some of the Prime Minister’s
infatuation with his image.

The really impressive thing about the celebration of Irwin’s life was
not the media hyperbole, the politicians’ gushing, or the
professional sincerity of various celebrity actors. No, it was the
quiet dignity of his family, especially his father, whose brief
speech was understated and genuinely moving. The family’s rejection
of the absurd offer of a state funeral injected a rare dose of common
sense into the aftermath of Irwin’s sad death.

The dangers of patriotism have just been dramatically illustrated by
the recent criminal indictment in Turkey of the novelist Elif Shafak
for having insulted "Turkishness". Her alleged crime consisted in
writing a novel that explores the dark secret of Turkish crimes
against Armenians at the end of the Ottoman Empire when thousands of
Armenians were massacred in an outrageous ethnic cleansing. We are
still some way from criminalising criticism of our past (and to the
credit of the Turkish courts, she was acquitted) but the price of
massive self-deception and manipulated sentiment so often inherent in
the patriotic voice is very high. We need to confront our urgent
problems calmly, rationally and with an eye to empirical facts and
universal values. Patriotic posturing is at best a distraction, and
at worst a dangerous folly.

Tony Coady is professorial fellow at the Centre for Applied
Philosophy and Public Ethics at Melbourne University.

BAKU: Azerbaijani and Armenian FMs to meet in Paris once again

Azerbaijani and Armenian Foreign Ministers to meet in Paris once again

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Oct 6 2006

[ 06 Oct. 2006 19:06 ]

Azerbaijani and Armenian Foreign Ministers Elmar Mammadyarov and Vardan
Oskanyan had one-by-one meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey
Lavrov and OSCE MG co-chairs in the Ministry building in Moscow today.

Then the ministers negotiated in the presence of the co-chairs.
Azerbaijan FM Press and Information Policy chief Tahir Tagizadeh
told the APA that the ministers discussed all main principles of
the Nagorno Garabagh conflict solution and co-chairs’ new proposals.
Mammadyarov positively evaluated the negotiation.

The ministers agreed to meet in Paris on October 24. /APA/

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Iraq’s anti-Christian pogroms

Iraq’s anti-Christian pogroms
By Charles Tannock

Manila Times, Philippines
Oct 6 2006

The world is consumed by fears that Iraq is degenerating into a civil
war between Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds. But in this looming war of all
against all, it is Iraq’s small community of Assyrian Christians that
is at risk of annihilation.

Iraq’s Christian communities are among the world’s most ancient,
practicing their faith in Mesopotamia almost since the time of
Christ. The Assyrian Apostolic Church, for instance, traces its
foundation back to 34 AD and Saint Peter. Likewise, the Assyrian Church
of the East dates to 33 AD and Saint Thomas. The Aramaic that many of
Iraq’s Christians still speak is the language of those apostles-and
of Christ.

When tolerated by their Muslim rulers, Assyrian Christians contributed
much to the societies in which they lived. Their scholars helped usher
in the "Golden Age" of the Arab world by translating important works
into Arabic from Greek and Syriac. But in recent times, toleration
has scarcely existed. In the Armenian Genocide of 1914-1918, 750,000
Assyrians-roughly two-thirds of their number at the time-were massacred
by the Ottoman Turks with the help of the Kurds.

Under the Iraqi Hashemite monarchy, the Assyrians faced persecution
for co-operating with the British during the First World War. Many
fled to the West, among them the Church’s patriarch. During Saddam’s
wars with the Kurds, hundreds of Assyrian villages were destroyed,
their inhabitants rendered homeless, and dozens of ancient churches
were bombed. The teaching of the Syriac language was prohibited
and Assyrians were forced to give their children Arabic names in an
effort to undermine their Christian identity. Those who wished to
hold government jobs had to declare Arab ethnicity.

In 1987 the Iraqi census listed 1.4 million Christians. Today, only
about 600,000 to 800,000 remain in the country, most on the Nineveh
plain. As many as 60,000, and perhaps even more, have fled since
the beginning of the insurgency that followed the United States-led
invasion in 2003. Their exodus accelerated in August 2004, after the
start of the terrorist bombing campaign against Christian churches by
Islamists who accuse them of collaboration with the allies by virtue
of their faith.

A recent UN report states that religious minorities in Iraq "have
become the regular victims of discrimination, harassment, and,
at times, persecution, with incidents ranging from intimidation to
murder," and that "members of the Christian minority appear to be
particularly targeted."

Indeed, there are widespread reports of Christians fleeing the country
as a result of threats being made to their women for not adhering
to strict Islamic dress codes. Christian women are said to have had
acid thrown in their faces. Some have been killed for wearing jeans
or not wearing the veil.

This type of violence is particularly acute in the area around Mosul.

High-ranking clergy claim that priests in Iraq can no longer
wear their clerical robes in public for fear of being attacked by
Islamists. Last January, coordinated car-bomb attacks were carried
out on six churches in Baghdad and Kirkuk; on another occasion, six
churches were simultaneously bombed in Baghdad and Mosul. Over the
past two years, 27 Assyrian churches have reportedly been attacked
for the sole reason that they were Christian places of worship.

These attacks go beyond targeting physical manifestations of the
faith. Christian-owned small businesses, particularly those selling
alcohol, have been attacked, and many shopkeepers murdered. The
director of the Iraqi Museum, Donny George, a respected Assyrian,
says that he was forced to flee Iraq to Syria in fear of his life,
and that Islamic fundamentalists obstructed all of his work that was
not focused on Islamic artifacts.

Assyrian leaders also complain of deliberate discrimination in the
January 2005 elections. In some cases, they claim, ballot boxes did
not arrive in Assyrian towns and villages, voting officials failed to
show up, or ballot boxes were stolen. They also cite the intimidating
presence of Kurdish militia and secret police near polling stations.

Recently, however, there are signs the Iraqi Kurdish authorities are
being more protective of their Christian communities.

Sadly, the plight of Iraq’s Christians is not an isolated one in the
Middle East. In Iran, the population as a whole has nearly doubled
since the 1979 revolution; but, under a hostile regime, the number of
Christians in the country has fallen from roughly 300,000 to 100,000.

In 1948 Christians accounted for roughly 20 percent of the
population of what was then Palestine. Since then, their numbers
have roughly halved. In Egypt emigration among Coptic Christians is
disproportionately high; many convert to Islam under pressure, and
over the past few years violence perpetrated against the Christian
community has taken many lives.

The persecution of these ancient and unique Christian communities,
in Iraq and in the Middle East as a whole, is deeply disturbing. Last
April the European Parliament voted virtually unanimously for the
Assyrians to be allowed to establish (on the basis of section 5 of
the Iraqi Constitution) a federal region where they can be free from
outside interference to practice their own way of life. It is high
time now that the West paid more attention, and took forceful action
to secure the future of Iraq’s embattled Christians.

Charles Tannock is vice-president of the Human Rights Subcommittee of
the European Parliament and UK Conservative Foreign Affairs spokesman.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Az. Amb. to CE: Azerbaijani Delegation Achieved Ends Set at PA

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
Oct 6 2006

Azerbaijan Ambassador to CE: Azerbaijani Delegation Achieved Ends Set
at PACE Autumn`s Session

Source: Trend
Author: A. Ismayilova

06.10.2006

The Azerbaijani delegation to the Council of Europe (CE) has achieved
the ends set at the autumn`s session of PACE (Parliamentary Assembly
of Council of Europe), Agshin Mekhtiyev, Azerbaijan`s Ambassador to
CE exclusively told Trend commenting the autimn`s session of PACE
completed today.

Mr. Mekhtiyev thinks that on the whole, the results of the session
are can be called positive. The Azerbaijani delegation prepared
documents on a number of issues touching different aspects of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, as well as other issues of a great
interest to Azerbaijan and d then distributed them in PACE. Among
these issues, a document on possible dangerous consequences of the
operating Metsamor Atomic Power Station in Armenia, and continued
pollution of waters of the Kura River by Armenians, etc.

In addition, the Ambassador pointed out that some issues that were
introduced to the agenda were of a certain interest to Azerbaijan as
well. For example, the debate on discussing the issue on foundation
of the memorial Centre for Victims of Forced Deportations and Ethnic
Clean-Ups. "Armenians did all their best to use this debate to
blacken our country again, and once more appear as a "long-suffering"
nation. But, the Azerbaijani MPs perfectly rejected all their views"
he added.

"The information about the black business of Armenian Dashnak bands
against Azerbaijanis in the course of the history, including the
Stalin`s approved deportations of Azerbaijani population from the
territory of the modern Armenia, the nowadays` genocide acts and the
ethnic clean-up in Khodjali and the other territories which are under
the Armenian occupation now", told Mr. Mekhtiyev.

Within the PACE session, Pact on Stability in South Caucasus was
discussed in the PACE Political Committee and recommended to further
discussion during the January`s session of PACE. The initial
discussion of the issues concerning the preparation of the report of
Rapporteur of the PACE Committee for Migration, Refugees, and
Population in South Caucasus Leo Platvoet was took place as well. The
Ambassador thinks that both the issues will be included to the agenda
of the PACE January`s session.

He also considers the meeting among Head of the Azerbaijani
Parliamentary Delegation to CE Samad Seyidov and Head of the PACE
Subcommittee for Nagorno-Karabakh Lord Russell Johnston with the Head
of the Armenian delegation to CE important. The corresponding offices
of PACE discussed the preparation for the visit of the PACE mission
on the situation over the Azerbaijan cultural heritage on the
occupied territories of Azerbaijan and in Armenia itself.
Negotiations with the Co-Rapporteurs on Azerbaijan Tony Lloyd and
Andreas Herkel were held.

Turkey warns French draft bill on Armenian killings could severely h

International Herald Tribune, France
Oct 6 2006

Turkey warns French draft bill on Armenian killings could severely
hurt ties

The Associated Press
Published: October 6, 2006

ANKARA, Turkey Turkey on Friday warned that a French bill that would
make it a crime to deny that World War I-era killings of Armenians
amounted to genocide could severely hurt ties between the two
countries.

French lawmakers, who had caved to pressure from Turkey and put off
sensitive debate on the issue in the lower house in May, are
scheduled to debate the bill on Thursday.

"The Armenian issue has poisoned our relations in the past more than
enough. But this time, it is obvious that the mentioned draft bill
will inflict an irreparable heavy blow to our improving relations,"
Foreign Ministry Spokesman Namik Tan told a news conference.

Tan said that the approval of the bill would be considered by the
Turkish public as "a hostile act."

It is obvious that it would not be possible to control the reaction
of our public opinion," he said.

Under the bill, people who contest that there was an Armenian
genocide would risk up to a year in prison and fines of up to ~@45,000
(US$57,000).

On Tuesday, Turkey said it was out of the question to accept a call
by French President Jacques Chirac who urged Turkey to acknowledge
the mass killings of Armenians in the early 20th century as genocide.

Armenians claim that as many as 1.5 million of their ancestors were
killed in 1915-1923 in an organized campaign to force them out of
eastern Turkey, and have pushed for recognition of the killings
around the world as genocide.

Turkey acknowledges that large numbers of Armenians died, but says
the overall figure is inflated and that the deaths occurred in the
civil unrest during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. But Ankara is
facing increasing pressure to fully acknowledge the killings,
particularly as it seeks membership in the European Union.

ANKARA, Turkey Turkey on Friday warned that a French bill that would
make it a crime to deny that World War I-era killings of Armenians
amounted to genocide could severely hurt ties between the two
countries.

French lawmakers, who had caved to pressure from Turkey and put off
sensitive debate on the issue in the lower house in May, are
scheduled to debate the bill on Thursday.

"The Armenian issue has poisoned our relations in the past more than
enough. But this time, it is obvious that the mentioned draft bill
will inflict an irreparable heavy blow to our improving relations,"
Foreign Ministry Spokesman Namik Tan told a news conference.

Tan said that the approval of the bill would be considered by the
Turkish public as "a hostile act."

It is obvious that it would not be possible to control the reaction
of our public opinion," he said.

Under the bill, people who contest that there was an Armenian
genocide would risk up to a year in prison and fines of up to ~@45,000
(US$57,000).

On Tuesday, Turkey said it was out of the question to accept a call
by French President Jacques Chirac who urged Turkey to acknowledge
the mass killings of Armenians in the early 20th century as genocide.

Armenians claim that as many as 1.5 million of their ancestors were
killed in 1915-1923 in an organized campaign to force them out of
eastern Turkey, and have pushed for recognition of the killings
around the world as genocide.

Turkey acknowledges that large numbers of Armenians died, but says
the overall figure is inflated and that the deaths occurred in the
civil unrest during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. But Ankara is
facing increasing pressure to fully acknowledge the killings,
particularly as it seeks membership in the European Union.

Armenia interested in development of trade relations with Europe

ARMENIA INTERESTED IN DEVELOPMENT OF TRADE RELATIONS WITH EUROPE
THROUGH BLACK SEA PORTS OF ROMANIA

Arka News Agency, Armenia
Oct 6 2006

YEREVAN, October 6. /ARKA/. Armenia is highly interested in development
of trade relations with European countries through the Black Sea ports
of Romania, Armenian President Robert Kocharian reported Wednesday
at the joint press conference with Romanian President Traian Basescu.

"However, today there is not a developed system to operate these
Black Sea ports," he said.

Kocharian pointed out that Armenia is interested in this direction of
development of relations with Romania before its accession to the EU.

"This is the direct trade route with European countries, and we are
highly interested in its effective development," Kocharian said.

In his turn, the Romanian president said that Romania will always
support the improvement of political, economic, and social relations
with the countries of the Black Sea region, especially with Armenia.

R.O. –0–