Appel De La Federation Euro-Armenienne A L’Occasion Du 90 EmeAnniver

FEDERATION EURO-ARMENIENNE
pour la Justice et la Démocratie
Avenue de la Renaissance 10
B-1000 Bruxelles
Tel: +32 2 732 70 26
Tel/Fax: +32 2 732 70 27
Email : [email protected]

COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE
pour diffusion immédiate
19 avril 2005
Contact :Talline Tachdjian
Tel/Fax :+32 2 732 70 27

APPEL DE LA FEDERATION EURO-ARMENIENNE A L’OCCASION DU 90 EME ANNIVERSAIRE
DU GENOCIDE DES ARMENIENS

Bruxelles, Belgique – A l’occasion du 90ème anniversaire du Génocide
des Arméniens, la Fédération Euro-Arménienne appelle la société
civile européenne, les représentants de la vie associative, les
survivants du génocide des Arméniens, les enfants des rescapés du
génocide, les représentants d’associations de Défense des victimes
de génocides et de crimes contre l’Humanité, les représentants
d’associations de Défense des Droits de l’Homme, les représentants
des associations et organisations signataires de la Charte des
Arméniens d’Europe, et les acteurs de la vie politique en Europe,
à signer un appel aux institutions démocratiques et exécutives de
l’Union européenne, afin qu’elles commémorent dignement le 90ème
anniversaire du 1er génocide du XXème siècle, et qu’elles intègrent
l’exigence de reconnaissance des Parlements nationaux et du Parlement
européen dans les documents officiels des négociations futures.

La Fédération Euro-Arménienne considère que cet anniversaire,
l’année même des négociations avec la Turquie, devra être un
tournant dans la place accordée à la question du génocide, par
l’exécutif européen, dans ses relations avec la Turquie.

La Commission européenne y avait fait allusion, dans son dernier
rapport sur la Turquie, dans le cadre des perspectives de sa politique
régionale, en omettant toutefois d’employer le terme de génocide,
et en la confinant aux simples relations bilatérales de la Turquie
avec l’Arménie.

« Accepter un pays négationniste en son sein est avant tout un
problème grave pour le futur de l’Europe ; l’exécutif européen ne
peut plus ignorer les appels incessants des Parlements nationaux et
du Parlement européen dont la résolution du 15 décembre dernier
demandait à la Commission et au Conseil européens d’exiger de la
Turquie la reconnaissance du génocide», a déclaré Hilda Tchoboian,
Présidente de la Fédération Euro-Arménienne.

La Fédération rappelle que les pays européens ont été les témoins
de cette extermination, commise aux confins de l’Europe ; certains ont
été impliqués dans sa mise en exécution. D’autres ont promis de
faire justice et de poursuivre l’Etat responsable et ses dirigeants
coupables ; rien de tout cela n’a été fait en raison de la politique
de compromissions des Alliés, qui a abouti à l’amnésie générale
en Europe sur cette tragédie.

« L’Europe constitutive de ces mêmes Etats n’est pas exempte
de ce grand crime ; aujourd’hui un devoir de mémoire s’impose
à nous comme à aux Institutions démocratiques européennes »,
rappelle Hilda Tchoboian.

L’appel de la Fédération Euro-Arménienne est ouvert à tous les
démocrates et organisations constitutives de la société civile
européenne.

Le texte est disponible sur et ci-dessous. Si vous
n’avez pas la possibilité de le signer en ligne, merci de l’imprimer,
de le signer et de nous le renvoyer à

FEDERATION EURO-ARMENIENNE
Avenue de la Renaissance 10
B-1000 BRUXELLES
BELGIQUE

Fax: +322 732 70 27
E-mail: [email protected]

****************************************************************************

APPEL EUROPEEN A L’OCCASION DU 90 EME ANNIVERSAIRE DU GENOCIDE DES ARMENIENS

Il y a 90 ans, le gouvernement jeune-turc de l’empire ottoman
déclenchait, organisait et exécutait la destruction délibérée
du peuple arménien. En moins de deux ans, 1 500 000 Arméniens ont
été arrachés à leurs domiciles, déportés dans le désert dans
des conditions inhumaines, et systématiquement mis à mort ; hommes,
femmes et enfants. Ce génocide, a été perpétré dans le cadre
d’une idéologie raciale et dans l’objectif de spolier les terres
ancestrales du peuple arménien, a constitué la réponse aux appels
à la liberté, à l’égalité, à la justice sociale et à l’Etat
de droit du peuple arménien.

Aujourd’hui, il reste moins de 70 000 Arméniens reconnus comme tels,
en république de Turquie.

Les conséquences de ce crime sont incalculables et perdurent jusqu’à
nos jours. Au-delà des souffrances inouïes qu’il a occasionnées,
le génocide a été pensé comme l’ outil de création d’une nation
turque dans une Anatolie turquifiée. Les organisateurs, tous membres
du gouvernement de l’époque, ont ainsi délibérément détruit
le patrimoine national de la civilisation arménienne. Ils ont
également organisé la spoliation des propriétés arméniennes
afin de transférer l’économie nationale aux mains du seul peuple
turc. Le gouvernement turc a ainsi conçu la destruction du peuple
arménien en entreprise nationale.

La République turque a de la sorte été fondée sur l’extermination
des Arméniens et sur l’expulsion des survivants et des autres
minorités notamment chrétiennes ; Créée par les organisateurs du
Génocide eux-mêmes, elle a accru le préjudice moral et matériel
dont elle est responsable, par la destruction continue des vestiges du
patrimoine d’Arménie Occidentale, par l’oppression de sa minorité
arménienne restante et par une négation haineuse et agressive de
la réalité du Génocide.

La Communauté internationale, et singulièrement les Etats
européens, avait, en son temps, immédiatement condamné ce
crime “de lèse-Humanité”, en affirmant qu’elle engagerait des
poursuites contre l’Etat criminel et contre les responsables de cette
politique. Confrontée cependant à la montée de la Turquie moderne
et à ses avances commerciales, elle avait progressivement abandonné
ses engagements de Justice.

Depuis lors, face au négationnisme de l’Etat turc, l’Europe a reconnu
le génocide par une résolution du Parlement européen le 18 juin
1987 ; par ailleurs, de nombreux Parlements nationaux des Etats
membres l’ont reconnu officiellement.

De 2000 à 2004, le Parlement européen a régulièrement appelé la
Turquie à assumer ses responsabilités en reconnaissant elle-même
le génocide.

Aujourd’hui, à l’occasion du 90ème anniversaire du 1er génocide du
XXème siècle, et à la veille des négociations d’adhésion de l’UE
avec la Turquie, nous affirmons qu’accepter la négation du génocide
par ce pays, c’est mettre en danger les valeurs de justice et de paix,
fondatrices de l’Europe.

Nous,
– Représentants de la vie associative et de la société civile européenne
– Survivants du génocide des Arméniens
– Enfants et petits enfants des rescapés du génocide des Arméniens
– Représentants d’associations de Défense des victimes de génocides et de
Crimes contre l’Humanité
– Représentants d’associations de Défense des Droits de l’Homme
– Représentants des associations et organisations signataires de la Charte
des Arméniens d’Europe
– Acteurs de la vie politique européenne

– Considérons que la Turquie actuelle reste juridiquement
et politiquement responsable de ce Crime contre l’Humanité.

– Considérons que la Turquie doit reconnaître sa
responsabilité dans ce crime

– Appelons les institutions européennes à commémorer
solennellement le génocide des Arméniens durant l’année 2005,

– Appelons l’exécutif européen, la Commission et le Conseil
européens, à mettre en application les reconnaissances
du génocide par les peuples européens, en intégrant
l’exigence exprimée par le Parlement européen sur la
reconnaissance du génocide dans les documents officiels
du cadre des négociations avec la Turquie.

Date:
Lieu:

Nom:
Prenom:
Tél:
Fax:
E-mail:
Adresse:
Code postal:
Ville :
Pays:

####

–Boundary_(ID_mmGrjExMm8Axk86hucWU Pw)–

www.eafjd.org

MINSK: Belarusian president delivers state-of-nation address

Belarusian president delivers state-of-nation address

Belarusian television, Minsk
19 Apr 05

Belarusian President Alyaksandr Lukashenka has pledged to stay the
course despite what he described as Western-sponsored attempts to
topple him. Delivering his annual state-of-the-nation address in
parliament, Lukashenka said Belarusians would not support anything
similar to the “coloured revolutions”, which he said the West had
staged in neighbouring CIS countries. He accused Poland of setting
Catholics in western Belarus against him and said Ukraine was training
“revolutionaries” to oust him. Lukashenka warned that the latest
military exercise had shown that the Belarusian armed forces were
prepared to repel any foreign invasion. He accused the USA and European
countries of funding the Belarusian opposition. Lukashenka described
Belarus as Russia’s most reliable ally, saying the union with Russia
would continue to develop. He devoted more than half of the two-hour
speech to his country’s economic performance and targets. The following
is an excerpt from the speech by Lukashenka relayed live by Belarusian
TV on 19 April; subheadings inserted editorially:

[Lukashenka] As has already been said, in accordance with
the constitution of Belarus, the head of state makes an annual
state-of-the-nation address, which is one of the weighty presidential
responsibilities.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka outlines the content of the address,
says that there will be no sensational statements and praises the
economy and living standards.]

Economic successes despite unfavourable external factors

The banking sector is growing steadily. Inflation is on a downward
trend and the situation in the currency market is stable. It should be
noted that we have attained this without any foreign aid or support,
without injections by the IMF and other financial institutions. We
have done this in spite of all the developments around our country
and in spite of unprecedented pressure, which is still experienced
by Belarus. You are well aware of this. Presently life in Belarus has
taken on a new texture. Higher incomes open up new possibilities for
social development.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka outlines economic development plans for
2005. He adds that small companies should be taken over by larger
industrial companies and ailing enterprises should revert to the
state.]

Companies should be able to compete in the market place. You
should bear in mind the fact that Belarus is gearing up for WTO
membership. Our failure to secure WTO membership will not generate any
fear, as we will still be involved in all the processes currently
ongoing in international trade. The key process is cut-throat
competition and we, Belarusians with our open economy, which is
dependent on fuel imports, should withstand. I would like to reiterate
this point. All our modest successes in the economy have been scored
against the backdrop of both severe competition and an upswing in
prices of raw materials, which we import. If it were not for such
high prices, we would be living much better and our companies would
be much more profitable.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka promises support to floundering companies
and threatens to persecute corrupt managers.]

Need to reduce dependence on foreign energy

Manufacturing companies using local fuel will be given top-priority
treatment. I have already said that Belarus is dependent on imports
of energy resources. Thus, our strategic objective is to introduce
energy-saving technology and make a shift to alternative sources
of power. The topicality of maintaining our energy security can be
ascribed to rising prices at international markets and growing needs
of our economy. Our primary task is to increase the share of local
fuels by 25-30 per cent. If we are able to meet 25 per cent of our
energy needs using local resources, we could say that Belarus is an
independent and sovereign country. Otherwise, all this boils down
to pure rhetoric. Everybody should save energy, both companies and
the population.

It does not mean that Belarus has any problems with energy. Heat,
electricity and gas will always be available. They will be in abundance
but this will come at a price. Prices will maintain their relentless
creep upward towards international level. This is the trend in the
country where we buy all this from. As Russia internationalizes
domestic prices, it will not sell us gas at lower prices. Of course
it will not. We indeed have agreed to keep the price of gas in 2005 at
the level seen this year. It comes with strings attached. It does not
mean that Russia has given us a gift of 200m dollars due a difference
in price. This is because we have reached a deal with Gazprom [Russian
gas giant] whereby we will render certain services to this company
in Belarus. Belarus should gain something from its central location
in Europe. This is exactly the resource we are going to tap. Major
transnational companies are prepared to pay for this and they already
do so.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka says that efforts to lay gas distribution
pipelines will be continued in the regions. He promises to support
small businesses, which are involved in manufacturing. He stresses
that more should be done to make Belarusian science more effective.]

Investment policy

Manufacturing of hi-tech goods and modernization of manufacturing
facilities are impossible without a well-considered investment
policy. We do not need investment for the sake of investment. We
should always remember that investments are not a gift and
should be paid for by assets or profits. Thus we should clearly
realize what we need investment for and how much. We should shape a
scientifically-grounded demand for investment resources. We need no
new manufacturing facilities. We should not tie up capital in new,
bare-boned structures. We need hi-tech equipment, which ideally should
be Belarusian-made. Currently more than a hundred diverse investment
projects are being implemented. In 2004 fixed capital investment
was up 20 per cent year-on-year and reached more than 5bn dollars, a
level we considered out of reach three years ago. We got no handouts
from abroad. We relied on our domestic resource. Thus we are in no
way dependent on anyone in this respect.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka promises higher growth in fixed capital
investment in 2005 and years ahead. He outlines ways to revive the
agricultural sector. He urges the government to do more to develop
tourism and housing construction. He urges people to do more sport]

Need to stop brain drain

The education system has a big role in educational activities. We
have managed to preserve and develop the best achievements of the
Soviet school. We have not surrendered to fashionable innovations by
copying other countries’ experience.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka dwells on need to take national interests
into account in reforming education.]

We can easily adjust our wonderful education system to world standards
and have no grievances or blame on the part of our neighbours. And
then you know, when studying this problem – you have probably noticed
that I often revisit it, two-three times a year – I have noticed that
our [switches to Belarusian] great, conscious [opposition members]
and scientists [switches to Russian again] say that our diplomas
and our specialists will not be in demand abroad. I ask them: whom
do you train specialists for? If they are not in demand, let it
be so. We need them here, in Belarus. Moreover, whatever kind of
system we had in Soviet times, I already told you who created the
Silicon Valley. Who? Russians, Belarusians and Jews from Belarus,
Russia and Ukraine. But at those times our system did not meet those
standards. However, they lured our most talented people. So, why are
we doing this? A good specialist will always find his vocation. And
our system is wonderful, I wish they had such a system.

[Passage omitted: Soviet achievements in the education sector should
be preserved and improved; foreign technology adopted.]

I would like to stress it once again that our education has world
prestige. This does not mean that we are training specialists for
export. We have no plans to subsidize foreign economies. If there are
such plans, they should be based on mutually beneficial interests. We
will bring up and develop talented young people ourselves because
any talent should be in demand in due time and in full.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka speaks about government support for
talented youth.]

I would like to address young people. Do not think that there is
heaven on Earth awaiting you somewhere beyond Belarus’s borders. You
will never get everything and at once there. Prestigious posts are
not being prepared for you there. They have such posts for their own
residents. Ask those who have returned from there. When conducting a
brain storming session on the hi-tech park establishment recently,
we found out that indeed, our people, citizens of Belarus, Russia,
Ukraine and other republics are in demand in the USA, especially in
the West, and so on. But they are in demand as handymen but not in
the leading managerial positions where one can see the system on the
whole, assess and evaluate it. They are not allowed there. What will
be if he comes back to Belarus with the understanding of the whole
system? Therefore, he is a cog being screwed into the machine. Go
ahead, we will suck the juice from you. And this whole system belongs
to their people. Is this not true? Let us think it over, young people,
above all, whether it is worth going there to become a cog and what
you will get there in connection with this. A total of 99 per cent do
come back here several years later and all definitely come to their
native land to die.

[Passage omitted: Belarus needs young specialists itself; Lukashenka
speaks about his meetings with students and instructs officials and
teachers to pay more attention to work with young people.]

Human smuggling

Families willing to adopt orphans will be found here, in
Belarus. Foreign adoptions may take place only in exceptional cases,
as was said earlier. And the fate of each child going abroad should
be closely followed, which we have introduced recently. But I am
convinced that we are capable of bringing up our children ourselves
and we should do this. You know, not long ago media, especially
in the Russian Federation, reported about one of the thousands of
horrible cases. The thing I warned you of a year ago when I was told:
Alyaksandr Ryhoravich, how can we do without foreign adoptions? Why
should we do this [restrict adoptions] if they feel good there, if
the children want this? Can you imagine, at the age of five or six, or
even three, they want [to be adopted by foreigners]? What does it lead
to? About 500,000, half a million, or 600,000 [children] from Russia
were adopted outside the territory of the Russian Federation. I do not
know how many our children [have been adopted] over these 10 years,
a figure was mentioned. More than 1,000, I believe about 1,500. And
what? Are you sure that this is not happening to our children? It
is good that we have started registering them there now. We started
looking into what is happening there. In no case are we prohibiting
[child adoptions]. We are just looking at each child – whether
they should be adopted abroad or not. We considered this issue in a
thorough way, the education minister has allowed the adoption of five
children by foreigner over the last year, since the last address [to
parliament], when this problem was raised. Five, no more. Moreover,
it was done with guarantees from very responsible people.

We were speaking a lot about trade in people. I saw a discussion in
this hall where we came to the point of absurdity. What shall we do if
a married woman loves someone on the side, and why should we need this
law? My dear, the essence of this edict [against human trafficking]
and this law that you have approved already is not in this. The issue
is not in this. We should tell our people, not only women, because it
[the edict] deals not only with trafficking in women. We are not going
to hang marital fidelity belts on appropriate body parts. This is your
problem. Please be your own masters, but trade in women is prohibited
in our state. They say how can it be so? Let her be her own master.

Excuse me, why do we ban trade in drugs? We do ban [drugs] trade. And
this trade will not take place here. You see the direction the world is
moving. A woman, if we speak about her, a girl should decide herself
what to do. But if a person goes [abroad] to earn some money and they
are dragged to other places, we should offer this assistance to them,
including abroad, if they do not want this, excuse me for being
rude. Earlier nobody was responsible for this. [Interior Minister
Uladzimir] Navumaw spoke here. He cannot reveal the details, as the
investigation is still in progress. But when we looked into what
is happening there [presumably, in model business], now there are
no vacant places in a remand centre. They have been jailed because
they were trading [in women], receiving huge money, for example, up
to 10,000 [dollars] for one trip to the [United] Arab Emirates. Who
received this money? Those beauties? No. Mediators lined their pockets
with the money.

Foreign embassies, Russian oil company said involved in trafficking

Moreover, this is shadow, black money. Millions of dollars were
circulating. We have monitored the trends taking place and looked
at it in an open manner. This is the problem. Some deputies started
shivering: what will happen, as everybody has been banned [from
travelling abroad]? Nobody has been banned from anything. It is
impossible to impose bans, as we do not live in closed society. They
will travel via Russia or other states. There are enough charlatans
at the embassies present here, especially at the embassies of
Eastern European states, who are helping with trafficking people from
here. We have discovered this at certain representative offices of big
companies, [Russia’s] LUKoil, above all, I will tell you frankly. They
have come here to refine oil but have been trafficking our girls abroad
instead. They were trafficked in batches, hundreds of people. They
have been jailed and are giving testimonies today. This is the problem.

[Passage omitted: the government does not mind trips abroad by
students but wants to make sure that Belarusians are properly treated
abroad. Lukashenka expands on development of culture, pledges support
to cultural figures.]

Belarusian pop music quota working well

All conditions for creative work by cultural figures have been
created in this country. I have even resorted to unpopular measures
and demanded that 50 per cent and later 75 per cent of Belarusian
music be broadcast [by TV and radio channels]. There was much noise
and indignation. They were shouting that there are no high-quality
discs or good singers. Look at the result. Most national performers
have recorded their new albums over the last year. Moreover, this was
done with modern technology. Their songs go on the air organically
together with Russian and foreign hits. This is a normal generally
recognized practice. Western countries are defending their interests,
including in the cultural area, on the state level. Why shouldn’t we
do this? How many foreign concerts did we have last year? Does anyone
know it? About 140 concerts were held only in Minsk.

[Passage omitted: Government should pay more attention to Belarusian
talented performers.]

No revolutions in Belarus

On stability and security. Everything we have created should be
reliably protected. The Belarusian people and authorities are equally
responsible for order and stability in this country. Therefore,
joint action by the state and society against any attempts to rock
the situation will be tough and adequate.

We are not pieces in somebody else’s game. Nor are we pawns on
someone’s chessboard, albeit a big one. We categorically reject
scenarios of a democratic change of political elites that are out
of favour with the West. In reality, all those coloured revolutions
are not revolutions at all. They are plain banditry disguised as
democracy. The Belarusian people fully exhausted the limit of such
revolutions last century.

I would like to ask you to take this into account. I am not idly
talking about long-term plans stretching to 2010. We will be
implementing these programmes and projects despite any extraneous
pressure. There is only one thing which can preclude us from performing
these tasks, namely the Belarusian people. No-one else. Not bandits
or imported revolutionaries. No amount of money will be able to topple
the existing authorities in Belarus. No amount of money and you should
bear it in mind.

I want those who carry this money in sacks and suitcases through
embassies to Belarus to hear this message. We know virtually
everything. Our silence does not mean that we are ignorant. We will
show up all sorts of charlatans to the Belarusian people. Things have
really touched bottom.

A US embassy official sold a car and declared it stolen the same
day. Then he packed off to the USA, having completed his allegedly
diplomatic mission. This is a flagrant demonstration of the
moral level of an embassy employee. When they were confronted with
documents confirming the sale of the car, the embassy sent him off in
a hurry. This is the purity of democrats who keep coming to Belarus to
force this democracy on us. This says nothing about those shown [on TV]
who were either blue [reference to their alleged gay sex orientation]
or green. They all want us to keep mum. We will not keep silent.

Warning to Polish embassy

I would also like to sound a warning to the Polish embassy and do
not regard it as a threat. We are well aware of what is going on
in your embassy and what you are working on. Do not work under the
pretension that Poles living in Belarus are not treated as Belarusian
citizens. They are our citizens. We will stand up for them and will not
allow you to pull wool over their eyes. They are currently devising
plans of action for 2006 [presidential election year]. Ukraine
is setting up training camps and says: we will be sending you
revolutionaries. Poles are trying to work in the western regions. One
of the means the use is connections in the Catholic Church. But so
far their efforts have not been too successful. Catholics are our
people and we do not limit their rights in any way.

We have long known that you will home in on this portion of the
population to destabilize the situation. They are also trying to
operate in Palesse. They are sick people. They do not realize that
Belarusians live in a totally different world, residents of Palesse
are our most reliable tenet and Poles in Belarus have long become our
Poles. They do not want to live anywhere else but in Belarus. They do
not want to go to Poland, Lithuania or other states. They are trying
to get in there. These people come to us and tell us everything. They
will never betray me. The first meeting which I attended was in Hrodna
in Poland or rather on the border with Poland with Poles. I have
done everything they asked me to and thus they have always respected
me. The international community will not look kindly on this. So
calm down. Please calm down for God’s sake. Do something kind for
the country and its people. You have some people to take guidance from.

These include the ambassadors of Turkmenistan, Armenia, Russia and
others. There is a sea of people who are loyal to Belarus and love
this country. They do not act as merely ambassadors. History teaches
us that they [revolutions] bring nothing but the collapse of the
system of state, devastation of the economy, protracted civil strife,
blood and human suffering. This is hardly surprising as this banditry
is ordered and paid for by extraneous forces.

It was carried out on orders of those who care little about the
country and the people and who seek to gratify their imperialistic
ambitions and capture new markets. Someone will have to work off the
money invested in the revolution. This money will be worked not by
those who actually got it but by the people. Do these people really
need this? This question is rhetorical.

No secret banks accounts

Some might take issue with our independent policy. However, we will
never surrender or sell it. No matter what pressure is being piled
on me, my family and colleagues, this will never come to pass. This
is a waste of time. Do not look for bank accounts and do not post
false information on this pile of junk, the Internet, about Lukashenka
stealing something. I have not stolen anything and I am telling this
in front of the people. You have been searching for something I have
stolen for the last three years. It is time to show the people and
the world what this Lukashenka has actually stolen. You cannot come
up with anything. You have invaded Iraq and wrecked the whole country
but cannot find the accounts. We are talking about 11bn dollars,
which is no joke. It equals three state budgets. It is nit-picking
and it is truly surprising that a huge country, which is aspiring
to become the only empire and the only focal point of the world, is
resorting to this. It is hard to undo me with this The more stones you
throw at me, the less believable the whole thing looks to the people.

It is good that some new trends are emerging. They [opposition]
have travelled to Vilnius and we have received the minutes of this
gathering held behind closed doors. It boils down to this: give us
the money. We do not have any money so give us some or there will
be no revolution. Tomorrow may be too late, so give us the money
now. The Europeans tell them to hold on. They say that they will
give the money of through official channels under TACIS and other
programmes. It is too dangerous to transport money in suitcases. We
have shown them recently that we are fully aware of who is taking
the money and where. There are lots of people involved in this. The
situation smacks of absurdity.

There has been much ado about [Mikhail] Marynich [jailed opposition
leader]. We have shown what this man is about. He is said to be dying
in prison but he gets married the same day. You should have taken
a closer look at this man. In America it was reported that he was
about to die, but instead he gets married. If you continue with such
an approach, you will never stage a revolution in Belarus. [Applause].

No need for democracy lectures

You could pay us and we will help you to come up with something to
show for the money spent. I would like to draw the attention of the
people and the parliamentarians to who is trying to lecture us on
democracy. These lecturers in parenthesis have their hands full with
problems with democracy at home. Systematic violations of civil rights
during presidential elections in the USA and farcical EU membership
referenda bear this out. We are well aware of this as it is happening
near our borders. It is an open secret that the West has allocated
a great deal of funds to mount media pressure on our country. It is
clear why it is being done. The situation is developing in line with
the time-tried scenario. I would like to stress once again that some
new trends have emerged. We welcome this.

These new trends are not limited to Vilnius. Several dozen people
went to Washington to select a single presidential candidate. Although
people there are keenly interested in this, they said that they were
not mature enough to warrant multi-million dollar infusions. You
should pull your socks up and then we will see. There is no-one
to do that. They are all has-beens. They used to be members of my
teams. They did not get the portfolios they were seeking and thus
joined the opposition. Keep struggling, it is fine with me. We should
counteract this with truth. We live on our land and the people of
Belarus rather than extraneous power centres should make their destiny.

Army capable of defending Belarus

Today we have to acknowledge that the hopes for civilization’s
peaceful development that emerged at the end of last century are not
coming true. The escalation of tension in critical regions points
to the world community’s inability to guarantee the sovereignty
and territorial integrity of individual states. Some countries have
developed the habit of establishing peace and democracy on the planet
with the help of weapons. Therefore, strengthening Belarus’s defence
capability remains a key challenge.

We have a blueprint worked out for military-technical policy up
to 2015, conditions are formed for qualitative reform of the armed
forces. They are getting better organized and more mobile.

I said up to 2015, but this should not be interpreted as if I
personally am going to implement this – to prevent embassies getting
shivers about Lukashenka intending to stay on until 2015.

This is confirmed by annual comprehensive operational and tactical
military exercises. We have recently conducted an unprecedented,
even for the Soviet army, exercise, where a situation close to real
combat was unexpectedly imitated and a number of military units were
put on alert. Military hardware that had been in long-term storage
since Soviet times was taken out. Reserve servicemen were called up.

We saw for ourselves that, despite some drawbacks, our armed forces
are capable of defending the people and protecting the independence
of our state. Our military industrial complex has shown it powerful
resource. We will continue to boost the potential of the defence
sector of the Belarusian economy. Any army should be battle-ready. A
law-abiding citizen in Belarus should live and work calmly. He should
not be afraid for his life.

The state should guarantee the safety of his family and his property. A
directive issued by the president was designed to achieve these ends.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka praises the directive aimed at boosting
discipline in the country.]

Friendship with Russia

Comprehensive cooperation and relations with fraternal Russia are
a strategic area. Our relations with it [Russia] remain unchanged,
and they are stable and trusted. They will be developed continuously
on principles laid down in the basis of our [Belarus-Russia] union
state treat

Our shared interests provide for effective cooperation in the field of
international relations. We are not only diplomatic but also military
allies. Being united, we are ready to face any challenges. You might
have noticed that regardless of some criticism inside Russia, as
there are different people in Russia and there are those who hate and
dislike us, there if full understanding in Russia by its leadership,
the president, practically by all the Russian people today that
Belarus has been and remains, maybe unfortunately, the only reliable
partner and ally of the Russian Federation. We are not hiding this,
we are not trying to demonstrate to the West – look how independent
we are, as former [Soviet] Union republics used to demonstrate –
and to prove our independence by standing against Russia. We have
never been against Russia – we have been saying this for 10 years –
and we will be never against Russia.

Many have said that the process of work within the [Belarus-Russia]
union state treaty and processes and trends under way have slowed
down. Yes, they have slowed down to a certain degree, but not
because our relations have cooled down. No. I cannot state this
fully today but all this had to do mostly with Ukraine at some
point. There were too big distractions for this. But neither I, nor
the Russian president, nor the leadership of Belarus and Russia has
ever stopped this process. We knew that everything depends on the
economy. And despite this disintegration taking place in the CIS,
we should preserve the basis, the economy, our good relations in
the areas of diplomacy, politics and so on. Yes, there is a certain
misunderstanding, probably a slowdown, concerning issues of principle
with regard to handing over some functions to future union bodies,
whether to create them or not and so on.

We are very careful about this. You see there is no pressure at all
either on our part or on the part of the Russian Federation. Vladimir
Vladimirovich [Putin] said this recently in Sochi. We may take reckless
steps today and reap the fruits of our mistakes afterwards. Why should
we do this today? Why should we give reason to say that we are no
longer a state and are surrendering our sovereignty? I understand very
well that some in Belarus are awaiting this and rubbing their hands to
protect sovereignty and territorial integrity with arms. I know this,
but we are not going to give such presents to anybody. Moreover, we are
not going to destroy our statehood. I have always been saying this as
president and I am keenly interested in this. We will not give anyone
banners so that they will use them to pound us. You understand what
I am talking about. But we have cooperated and will cooperate with
the Russian Federation in specific areas, coming closer and closer
to each other, by
unifying our legislation and economic relations.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka praises economic cooperation with Russia
and Ukraine]

“Pragmatic” relations with Europe

Our relations with united Europe are developing in a pragmatic
way. Many European countries have been our economic partners for
a long time. Belarusian exports to the EU grew by more than 40 per
cent last year. Moreover, the trade balance was positive. And we will
do everything to broaden economic cooperation with the big united
Europe and we are ready to make sacrifices and do everything possible
ourselves to make sure Europe feels comfortable in Belarus.

There have been many problems in political relations with the EU
so far. Not all Europeans are impressed by political stability in
Belarus, the social orientation of economic changes. I would like to
say once again: we are ready for any constructive cooperation based
on equal rights and mutual respect. And we are proving this with our
actions. Belarus is interested in resuming full-scale dialogue with
the USA, but without pushes, especially, taking into account positive
developments in trade and economic relations. At the same time,
we will not tolerate attempts at political pressure, threats, any
sanctions. We hope common sense will always prevail in our relations.

The multi-directional course of Belarus’s foreign policy presupposes
strengthening ties with our partners in all regions of the world. There
will be mutual benefits.

[Passage omitted: upbeat comments about Belarus’s trade with Asian
and African countries in 2004.]

Thanks to India, China for support in UN

In this respect, I would like to express gratitude particularly to
the leadership of great China, great India, Russia, Iran and other
states for the colossal support they have been providing to us in
international bodies. Moreover, they have not only been providing
support, they have actually taken us under their shelter. We will pay
them in kind. Our country will continue standing for strengthening
the UN role in solving the world’s problems. But we stand against
the politicization of this influential organization and its bodies,
in particular, the Commission on Human Rights, against attempts to
abuse its authority in the interests of the powers that be. Even
more negative trends of politicization have been displayed in OSCE
activities. We stand for reforming this international structure
together with Russia, Kazakhstan, other states. On the whole, our
foreign policy may be described as worthy and consistent. This is
the unchangeable stance of the state which is aware of its worth and
which respects itself and others. This stance is not accidental. It
has been achieved by the Belarusian people through much suffering
and its roots lie in our heroic history.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka speaks about forthcoming Victory Day
celebrations, pledges support to World War II veterans, hails the
victory of the USSR and its western allies over Nazi Germany.]

Concern about “monuments to Nazis”

However, many of those willing to deprive us of this victory have
appeared today. The idea is that it was not we who won the war is being
persistently imposed by all means. I told you this seven years ago
when these trends just began to appear. There is a real information
aggression campaign being conducted through television, cinema,
literature and the press. A cynical and a tough one. Monuments to SS
soldiers are being unveiled in some countries, and we know them well,
huge state allowances are being paid to fascist henchmen. And those
who were fighting against the brown plague are leading a wretched
existence. They are not victors there today, they are occupying troops,
migrants, non-citizens. Revenge-seekers of all sorts are lifting up
their heads. Please note, one intelligent person, I do not remember
whether he was a Belarusian or a Russian, I watched it on TV, said:
the heads of those states and their people did not say then, after
the war, that they would erect monuments to SS soldiers. They declared
themselves among the victors over the fascism, Nazi Germany. Some time
has passed and today they are on the other side of the barricade. And
this man, a former servicemen, I believe, said: what would have
happened to these states if they had expressed this stance at that
time? They would not have been among the victors, they would have
been among the defeated with all the ensuing consequences. It was put
very aptly. And we should pay attention to this. But we have things
to set against it. Belarusian society is solid: steadfast veterans,
diligent workers and peasants, the well-educated intelligentsia and
the goal-oriented youth.

[Passage omitted: Lukashenka praises Belarusians’ moral values, praises
the quality of Belarusian textbooks on the history of World War II.]

Roots of success

It is high patriotism that is the cornerstone of our common home
called Belarus. Many political scientists are looking for the secrets
and causes of our stability. We do not hide them.

They include strong and efficient authorities, which do not and will
not allow anarchy to rule and political conflicts to happen. The
authorities working for the people’s benefit, at least, we are trying
to do so.

They include a stable economy which makes it possible to improve the
people’s wellbeing all the time. This is a formulated state ideology
that consolidates society and mobilizes it for the construction of
a flourishing state.

These are the solid grounds of civil society – councils, the public,
youth, trade unions, veteran organizations, which unite broad strata
of our population. These are the sources of our strength and confidence
in future.

Today Belarus is quite different from what it was yesterday. Have a
look how we have grown up and matured, how we are striding forward,
preserving the continuity of generations and assessing the past and
forecasting the future in the right way.

Addressing the Belarusian people and our parliamentarians, I am looking
with confidence into tomorrow, into the future being created today. I
believe it [the future] will be bright because we have been doing
everything in a consistent and well-justified manner to make sure
Belarus develops and flourishes and our children and grandchildren
are better off. Thank you for your attention.

BAKU: Azeri president notes increased EU attention to Karabakh confl

Azeri president notes increased EU attention to Karabakh conflict

Azad Azarbaycan TV, Baku
19 Apr 05

[Presenter] The attention of the European Union to the resolution
of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict has increased, [Azerbaijani]
President Ilham Aliyev said at a meeting with a delegation of the
EU-Azerbaijan parliament cooperation committee.

The president said that the work of the EU special representative in
connection with the problem is an indicator of this attention.

For her part, the head of the delegation, (?Maria Ashler Bequin),
said that during her visit to Azerbaijan, she visited displaced people
who have settled in Barda District and witnessed that they live in
intolerable conditions.

[Video showed the meeting]

Spiegel: Gedenken an Armenier-Massaker

Druckversion – Gedenken an Armenier-Massaker: Türkei macht gegen Union mobil –
Politik – SPIEGEL ONLINEMemories on Armenian massacres: Turkey active against
(German opposition) Union

SPIEGEL ONLINE – 19. April 2005, 15:40
URL: ,1518,352155,00.html

Gedenken an Armenier-Massaker

Türkei macht gegen Union mobil

Von Severin Weiland

Wochenlang versuchte die Regierung in Ankara, Druck auf die Union
auszuüben: Hinter einem Antrag, den die CDU/CSU im Bundestag zum
Massaker der Türken an den Armeniern einbringt, vermutet die Türkei
einen Komplott, um den EU-Beitritt zu verhindern. Doch vergeblich:
In dieser Woche wird im Bundestag der Antrag beraten.

AFP

Gedenkstätte im armenischen Eriwan: Streit über die Deutungshoheit
Berlin – In der vergangenen Woche erhielten die Bundestagsabgeordneten
Post vom türkischen Botschafter Mehmet Ali Irtemcelik. “Mit
der Zuversicht, dass Sie entsprechend der vielschichtigen
Sensibilität und mit dem der Bedeutung dieses Themas gebührenden
Verantwortungsbewusstsein vorgehen werden, danke ich Ihnen für die
Zeit, die Sie dafür aufwenden”, so die Bitte des Diplomaten.

Die Sendung enthielt Dokumente, in denen die Türkei
ihre verharmlosende Sicht des Völkermords an den Armeniern
darstellt. “Verkürzungen” machte darin der frühere Ministerpräsident
von Sachsen-Anhalt, Christoph Bergner, aus. “Dass eine Botschaft so
ein Material an Abgeordnete weiterleitet, ist äußerst fragwürdig”,
wundert sich der Christdemokrat.

In diesem Jahr jährt sich zum neunzigsten Mal der Massenmord an
den Armeniern, der am 24. April 1915 seinen Anfang nahm. CDU und
CSU nahmen das Datum Mitte Februar zum Anlass, einen Gedenk-Antrag
in den Bundestag einzubringen. Die geschichtliche Aufarbeitung
des Völkermords gehöre für die Union zur europäischen
Erinnerungskultur, betonten CDU-Politiker. Seitdem ist Ankara
verstimmt. Aber auch die Bundesregierung geriet in Nöte.

Nun wird an diesem Donnerstag über den Antrag im Bundestag
beraten. Statt einer Abstimmung wird das Papier zunächst in die
Ausschüsse überwiesen. Ein gängiges Verfahren im Parlamentsalltag –
das allerdings in diesem Falle eine außenpolitische Note erhielt. Denn
nun wird der Antrag erst im Mai oder im Juni zur Abstimmung kommen –
also nach der Reise des Kanzlers vom 3. bis zum 4. Mai in die Türkei.

Ursprünglich hatten SPD und Grüne sogar daran gedacht, ein eigenes
Papier ins Parlament einzubringen. Wegen interner Abstimmungsprobleme
und aus Rücksicht auf die Bundesregierung wurde darauf aber
verzichtet, heißt es.

Das Thema ist brisant. Denn in der Türkei ist der Mord an der
christlichen Minderheit der Armenier noch immer ein Tabu. Historiker
im Westen gehen von mehr als einer Million Opfern aus.

Von Völkermord oder Genozid zu sprechen, wie es in vielen Forschungen
heutzutage getan wird, wagt auch der Unionsantrag nicht. Peinlichst
wurden beide Worte darin vermieden – um die Tür für künftige
Gespräche mit der türkischen Seite nicht zuzuschlagen. Stattdessen
wird an die “planmäßige Durchführung der Massaker und Vertreibungen”
erinnert. Die Bundesregierung solle dafür eintreten, “dass sich die
Türkei mit ihrer Rolle gegenüber dem armenischen Volk in Geschichte
und Gegenwart vorbehaltlos auseinandersetzt”. Zudem müsse sie sich
“für die Gewährung der Meinungsfreiheit in der Türkei, insbesondere
auch bezüglich der Massaker an den Armeniern” einsetzen.

Scharfe Töne aus Ankara

Kaum hatte die Union den Antrag eingebracht, brach ein Sturm der
Entrüstung über sie herein. Die türkische Seite mobilisierte ihre
Diplomaten und Politiker, in den Medien wurde eine regelrechte Kampagne
gegen die Union gestartet. “Es steht ausschließlich Historikern
zu, über geschichtliche Ereignisse Urteile zu fällen”, lautet die
offizielle Linie Ankaras, die sich etwa in der Presseerklärung des
Botschafters vom 27. Februar wieder findet. Das zweiseitige Papier
wurde auch an alle Konsulate der Türkei in der Bundesrepublik
verschickt – und ging von dort an sämtliche Landtagsfraktionen von
CDU und der CSU.

“Wir möchten nicht hoffen, dass unsere Freunde in den Unionsparteien
durch die plumpe Verleumdung der türkischen Geschichte beabsichtigen,
insbesondere unsere hier lebenden Bürger zu beleidigen und auf
diese Weise den Integrationsprozess zu beeinträchtigen sowie den
traditionellen und vielfältigen Beziehungen zwischen der Türkei und
Deutschland Schaden zuzufügen”, heißt es da. Und: Eine so wichtige
Institution wie die CDU/CSU werde der Verantwortung für Deutschland
nicht gerecht, “wenn sie sich zum Sprecher des fanatischen armenischen
Nationalismus macht”.

Ankara ließ nichts unversucht, um ihre Deutung der Geschichte
vorzubringen. Bergner und der CDU-Außenpolitiker Friedbert Pflüger
trafen sich gleich zweimal mit türkischen Politikern. Zum einen mit
zwei führenden Vertretern der regierenden konservativ-islamischen
AKP, dem früheren Außenminister Yasar Yakis und Saban Disli,
zum anderen mit Mitgliedern des EU-Harmonisierungsausschusses der
Nationalversammlung in Ankara.

Beim Gespräch mit den beiden AKP-Vertretern Yakis und Disli
erörterten die Christdemokraten auch die Möglichkeit, ob zwei
Historiker der deutschen und zwei der türkischen Seite sich des Themas
noch einmal annehmen. Das soll geschehen. “Auf unsere Beschlusslage
hat das aber keinen Einfluss, das betone ich ausdrücklich”,
so Bergner.

Ebenso suchten türkischstämmige Christdemokraten aus Berliner
Bezirken das Gespräch. Sie hätten von Austritten aus der CDU
berichtet, berichtet Bergner. Das Thema sei emotional aufgeladen,
stellte er fest.

Ankara vermutet eine Anti-Beitritts-Kampagne

Ankara vermutet hinter dem Antrag den Versuch, dem Land den Zutritt
zur EU zu erschweren. Im Gegensatz zu Rot-Grün und dem Kanzler
ist die Mehrheit in der Union gegen eine Vollmitgliedschaft und
plädiert stattdessen für eine privilegierte Partnerschaft des
Mittelmeer-Staates. Bergner weist die Behauptung, man wolle die
Annäherung der Türkei an Europa durchkreuzen, weit von sich. Um
die Frage der Türkei und die Art und Weise, wie sie an die EU
herangeführt werde – ob durch eine EU-Vollmitgliedschaft oder
privilegierte Partnerschaft – nicht mit der Armenierfrage zu belasten,
werde der Antrag federführend im Auswärtigen Ausschuss beraten – und
nur begleitend im Europaausschuss, betont er. “Es geht beim Gedenken
an den 90. Jahrestag nicht darum, die Türkei auf die Anklagebank
zu setzen, sondern sie in die europäische Erinnerungskultur mit
einzubeziehen”, sagte der Christdemokrat SPIEGEL ONLINE. Die EU
sei als “Versöhnungswerk” entstanden. Dazu gehöre auch, “sich den
dunklen Kapiteln der eigenen Geschichte zu stellen”.

Doch wenn es um das dunkelste Kapitel der türkischen Geschichte geht,
wird die türkische Botschaft schnell aktiv. Als kürzlich das Land
Brandenburg den Völkermord an den Armeniern in ein Schulbuch aufnehmen
wollte, sprach der Generalkonsul Aydin Durusoy persönlich beim
Brandenburger Ministerpräsidenten Matthias Platzeck vor. Kurzfristig
zurückgestellt, wird das Vorhaben nun nach einer Überarbeitung des
Lehrplans doch noch realisiert. Vorgesehen ist nun ein Kapitel über
mehrere Genozide, darunter auch den 1915/16 verübten Völkermord an
den Armeniern.

In Berlin gedachten vor vier Wochen Türken des früheren
Innenministers des Osmanischen Reiches, Mehmed Talaat
Pascha. Organisiert worden war die Kranzniederlegung vom Vorsitzenden
der Türkischen Gemeinde in Berlin, Tacittin Yatkin. Talaat, der mit
deutscher Hilfe nach dem Zusammenbruch des Osmanischen Reiches nach
Berlin geschleust worden war, gilt als einer der Hauptverantwortlichen
der Massaker.

Yatkin nannte Pascha noch im März einen “Märtyrer”. Der frühere
Innenminister des Osmanischen Reiches war am 15. März 1921 von einem
jungen Armenier auf der Hardenbergstraße in Berlin erschossen worden.

Die Aktivitäten der türkischen Seite zeigen: Der Antrag der Union
hat die regierende AKP unter Zugzwang gesetzt. Auf dem Weg nach Europa
versuchte sie vergangene Woche, das Thema in die Hand zu nehmen. In
der Nationalversammlung wurde eine Resolution verabschiedet, in
der unter anderem eine türkisch-armenische Historikerkommission
vorgeschlagen wird. Ohne den Unionsantrag zu erwähnen, wurde darin
der Versuch verurteilt, dass “ausländische Parlamente zu einem unter
internationalen Historikern umstrittenen Kapitel der Geschichte der
osmanischen Armenier” Beschlüsse fassten.

Das Dokument der Nationalversammlung landete via türkische Botschaft,
aber ohne Anschreiben, auch bei den CDU/CSU-Abgeordneten – im
türkischen Original und als zweiseitige “inoffizielle Übersetzung”,
wie es im Titel des Kopfes ausdrücklich heißt. Offenbar war der
türkischen Seite daran gelegen, der Union so schnell wie möglich
den Beschluss zukommen zu lassen. Die Sätze sind im holprigen Deutsch
formuliert, der Sendung lag kein Anschreiben bei.

CDU-Politiker Bergner nahm auch die jüngste Materialzusendung aus Ankara
gelassen hin. Es sei eben der “Versuch der türkischen Seite”, so der frühere
Ministerpräsident diplomatisch, “unsere Meinungsbildung zu begleiten”.

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2005
Alle Rechte vorbehalten
Vervielfältigung nur mit Genehmigung der SPIEGELnet GmbH

Images:
CDU-Vorsitzende Merkel, türkischer Premier Erdogan: Gespanntes Verhältnis zur
AKP

Türken vor gehängten Armeniern (1915): Bis heute tabuisiert

Erdogan-Anhänger in der Türkei: Reif für die EU?

CDU-Politiker Bergner: “Versuch, unsere Meinungsbildung zu begleiten”

–Boundary_(ID_SBmzRxtJYXidpty9pdgimQ)–

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0

Nagornyy Karabakh Republic [NKR] maps out five-year agriculturalprog

Nagornyy Karabakh Republic [NKR] maps out five-year agricultural programme

Arminfo, Yerevan
16 Apr 05

Stepanakert, 16 April: The Ministry of Agriculture of the Nagornyy
Karabakh Republic [NKR] has prepared an agricultural sector
development programme for the period between 2006 and 2010, an
Arminfo correspondent has quoted the NKR minister of agriculture,
Vagram Bagdasaryan, as telling a news conference in Stepanakert today.

Bagdasaryan said that important components of the programme are
the development of seed growing using state-of-the-art scientific
technologies, as well as grape growing, livestock breeding, processing,
irrigation, etc.

Under the programme, the republic’s needs for meat will be fully met
by 2010 (currently the figure stands at 48 per cent).

Also, grain production is expected to increase four to five times,
while grape production is expected to reach 22,000 tonnes [presumably
per year].

[Passage omitted: other agricultural indicators]

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Municipality Of Yerevan Mainly “Remits” Illegally Built Garages

MUNICIPALITY OF YEREVAN MAINLY “REMITS” ILLEGALLY BUILT GARAGES

YEREVAN, APRIL 18. ARMINFO. 95% of illegal erections “approved” by
the municipality of Yerevan are garages, Grigor Melkumian, general
Advisor of Yerevan’s mayor, informed journalists Monday.

According to him, the municipality does not satisfy mainly the
applications for legalization of large facilities. The municipal
authorities have satisfied 65% out of 38,000 bids with a request
of legalization of illegal buildings. In preliminary estimations
of the municipality, the receipts of the state budget may total 1.2
bln drams from the approval of the legalization of the erections and
lands. The fate of other 68,000 illegal erections, on which citizens
have not made application, will be determined within the next half
of this year. The municipality plans to carry out their inventory
making and submit documents concerning them to tax bodies.

Armenian opposition leader says government change “inevitable”

Armenian opposition leader says government change “inevitable”

Noyan Tapan news agency
19 Apr 05

Yerevan, 19 April: Armenia is currently in the hands of several
people and while the Turks devastated Armenia by massacring its
population, it is being devastated without a massacre today, the
leader of the National Democratic Union, Vazgen Manukyan, said at a
press conference today.

Noting that two parties of the [ruling] coalition, the Republican
Party of Armenia [RPA] and Armenian Revolutionary Federation –
Dashnaktsutyun [ARFD], have declared themselves national, he said:
“I would like them to take a sheet of paper and describe clearly
what they mean by national. Not loving the Turks does not mean
‘national’. And the third party of the coalition, the Orinats Yerkir
[Law-Governed Country] Party, wants to establish lawfulness in the
country, even though there is nothing lawful in Armenia.”

In Manukyan’s opinion, a change of government is inevitable in
Armenia. Not only the opposition and people, but also all the echelons
of the authorities realize this. “We must have allies not only among
the population, but also among the authorities,” he said.

In theory, the best way to normalize the situation in the country
would be if members of the government understood that the current
situation has to be changed and tried to carry out changes, which
would be a “revolution from the top”, Manukyan said. However, this
scenario is implausible, in Manukyan’s view. Under these conditions,
the revolution must take place from the bottom – “a big movement that
will make the change of government imminent”.

Manukyan also said that although candidates of the National Democratic
Union are not running in the municipal elections, the party will wage
a struggle to make the elections as fair as possible.

BAKU: Russia boosting presence in Caucasus to counter US influence –

Russia boosting presence in Caucasus to counter US influence – Azeri expert

Ayna, Baku
19 Apr 05

Text of C. Sumarinli report by Azerbaijani newspaper Ayna on 19
April headlined “Russia is setting up two more military bases against
Azerbaijan” and subheaded “Baku’s agreement to US military bases has
prompted Moscow to intensify its political activities”

Russia intends to set up two new military bases in Armenia by the end
of 2007, Ayna newspaper has learnt from Russian military sources. One
of the bases is to be located in Noyemberyan District and the other
on the southern shore of the Goyca [Sevan] Lake.

Russian Defence Minister Sergey Ivanov is set to visit Armenia in
June to tackle some of the issues (financial, technical and so on)
brought about by the deployment of the bases, the sources said.

A special delegation from Russia will visit Armenia in the next
few days to inspect the areas where the bases will be stationed,
the Russian sources said.

Experts reckon that Moscow’s intention is to counter US hegemony in
the South Caucasus, ensure that Armenia becomes an “eternal outpost” of
Russia and prevent any possibility of a “velvet revolution” in Armenia.

It is very likely that the military bases withdrawn from Georgia
will be located in Armenia, Col (retd) Ildirim Mammadov said in an
interview with Ayna. “Russia will soon move its military bases from
Georgia to Armenia. In return for this “favour”, Moscow may secure an
“arms corridor” through Georgia [to Armenia],” Mammadov said.

Experts reckon that the choice of Noyemberyan District and the southern
part of the Goyca Lake for the military bases is no coincidence. “For
example, it is possible to control Azerbaijan, Georgia, Armenia and
the eastern provinces of Turkey from Noyemberyan,” Mammadov said. He
added that the bases may be built soon.

This vile intention of Russia may create a serious obstacle for
resolving the Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict, the colonel said. “Against
the background of Western support for Azerbaijan, Russia would not
like to see Armenia – its strategic ally – defeated. At best, this
may result in the protracted settlement of the Karabakh conflict, and
in the worst case scenario, this may lead to Karabakh’s alienation
from Azerbaijan,” Mammadov said. He fears that if Russia’s presence
in Armenia grows stronger, this may result in a change – unfavourable
for Azerbaijan – in the arms arsenal of the Karabakh separatists.

Against the background of these realities, Azerbaijan has to make a
definite strategic choice, Mammadov said. “Baku must openly say whom
it chooses and what it wants. Only in this case, can we change the
direction of processes to our advantage,” he said.

Experts believe that Russia’s plans concerning Armenia must be regarded
as a fear that NATO military bases may be deployed in Georgia and
Azerbaijan. To recap, the Baku government – at the level of foreign
ministers – no longer rules out the deployment of American military
bases in Azerbaijan.

In this context, the anxiety of Russia’s Caspian Sea Fleet commander
Vice-Adm Yuriy Startsev, who will leave Baku today, is easy to
understand. “I am against the military presence of countries from
outside the region in the Caspian. Countries should deal with their
own problems themselves,” Startsev said while commenting on the US
plans regarding the “Caspian guard”. Implementing such a programme
in the Caspian may shift the balance of forces, he said.

It seems that Azerbaijan is turning into a battlefield of a serious
strategic competition between superpowers. What will be the ultimate
result of the “conflict” depends on the political steps taken by the
Baku government.

ANCA: Genocide Scholars Call on Turkey to Acknowledge Armenian Genoc

Armenian National Committee of America
888 17th St., NW, Suite 904
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (202) 775-1918
Fax: (202) 775-5648
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet:

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 19, 2005
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
Tel: (202) 775-1918

GENOCIDE SCHOLARS CALL ON TURKEY TO
END DENIAL OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

— ANCA Welcomes Open Letter by Leaders of the
International Association of Genocide Scholars

WASHINGTON, DC – The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA)
has welcomed an open letter by leaders of the International
Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) calling on Turkey to end
its campaign of denial of the Armenian Genocide and urging the
Turkish government to accept responsibility for this crime against
humanity.

The open letter, dated April 6th and first reported by Bloomberg
News on April 14th, was signed by Robert Robert Melson, the
President of the IAGS; Israel Charny, Vice-President of the
Association, and; New York Times Best-Selling author Peter
Balakian, who holds the Donald M. and Constance H. Rebar Professor
of the Humanities at Colgate University. These scholars wrote in
response to Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan’s call for an “impartial
investigation” of the fate of the Armenians in Turkey in 1915.

“We very much appreciate the strong leadership, academic integrity,
and moral clarity of professors Melson, Charney, and Balakian in
challenging Prime Minister Erdogan’s cynical attempt to force an
artificial debate on an issue that is thoroughly documented and
universally accepted – except by the few remaining academic
mercenaries in the service of Turkey’s state-controlled
institutions,” said Aram Hamparian, Executive Director of the ANCA.

Speaking on behalf of the “the major body of scholars who study
genocide in North America and Europe,” the authors of the letter
noted that the “Armenian Genocide is abundantly documented by
thousands of official records of the United States and nations
around the world including Turkey’s wartime allies Germany, Austria
and Hungary, by Ottoman court-martial records, by eyewitness
accounts of missionaries and diplomats, by the testimony of
survivors, and by decades of historical scholarship.”

The letter went on to stress that, “there may be differing
interpretations of genocide – how and why the Armenian Genocide
happened, but to deny its factual and moral reality as genocide is
not to engage in scholarship but in propaganda and efforts to
absolve the perpetrator, blame the victims, and erase the ethical
meaning of this history.”

“We would also note that scholars who advise your government and
who are affiliated in other ways with your state-controlled
institutions are not impartial. Such so-called “scholars” work to
serve the agenda of historical and moral obfuscation when they
advise you and the Turkish Parliament on how to deny the Armenian
Genocide,” the letter continued. “We believe that it is clearly in
the interest of the Turkish people and their future as a proud and
equal participant in international, democratic discourse to
acknowledge the responsibility of a previous government for the
genocide of the Armenian people, just as the German government and
people have done in the case of the Holocaust.”

Commenting on the letter, Hamparian added: “Clearly, the
international pressure is growing on Turkey, and Ankara is finding
itself increasingly isolated in its campaign of genocide denial.
Unfortunately, rather than following the post World War II German
model of accepting responsibility – as suggested in this letter –
the Turkish government has responded, internally, by outlawing
discussion of the Armenian Genocide – through Section 306 of their
new penal code, and, abroad, in the form of aggressive, but
increasingly transparent, efforts to deny the truth, engage in
diversionary tactics, and escape justice for its crime.”

The full text of the letter is provided below.

#####

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GENOCIDE SCHOLARS

President: Robert Melson (USA)
Vice-President: Israel Charny (Israel)
Secretary-Treasurer: Steven Jacobs (USA)

Respond to: Robert Melson, Professor of Political Science Purdue
University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA

April 6, 2005

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
TC Easbakanlik
Bakanlikir
Ankara, Turkey
FAX: 90 312 417 0476

Dear Prime Minister Erdogan:

We are writing you this open letter in response to your call for an
“impartial study by historians” concerning the fate of the Armenian
people in the Ottoman Empire during World War I.

We represent the major body of scholars who study genocide in North
America and Europe. We are concerned that in calling for an
impartial study of the Armenian Genocide you may not be fully
aware of the extent of the scholarly and intellectual record on
the Armenian Genocide and how this event conforms to the definition
of the United Nations Genocide Convention. We want to underscore
that it is not just Armenians who are affirming the Armenian
Genocide but it is hundreds of independent scholars, who have no
affiliations with governments, and whose work spans many countries
and nationalities and the course of decades. The scholarly evidence
reveals the following:

On April 24, 1915, under cover of World War I, the Young Turk
government of the Ottoman Empire began a systematic genocide of its
Armenian citizens ~V an unarmed Christian minority population. More
than a million Armenians were exterminated through direct killing,
starvation, torture, and forced death marches. Another million fled
into permanent exile. Thus an ancient civilization was expunged
from its homeland of 2,500 years.

The Armenian Genocide was the most well-known human rights issue of
its time and was reported regularly in newspapers across the United
States and Europe. The Armenian Genocide is abundantly documented
by thousands of official records of the United States and nations
around the world including Turkey’s wartime allies Germany, Austria
and Hungary, by Ottoman court-martial records, by eyewitness
accounts of missionaries and diplomats, by the testimony of
survivors, and by decades of historical scholarship.

The Armenian Genocide is corroborated by the international
scholarly, legal, and human rights community:

1) Polish jurist Raphael Lemkin, when he coined the term genocide
in 1944, cited the Turkish extermination of the Armenians and the
Nazi extermination of the Jews as defining examples of what he
meant by genocide.

2) The killings of the Armenians is genocide as defined by the 1948
United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the
Crime of Genocide.

3) In 1997 the International Association of Genocide Scholars, an
organization of the world’s foremost experts on genocide,
unanimously passed a formal resolution affirming the Armenian
Genocide.

4) 126 leading scholars of the Holocaust including Elie Wiesel and
Yehuda Bauer placed a statement in the New York Times in June 2000
declaring the “incontestable fact of the Armenian Genocide” and
urging western democracies to acknowledge it.

5) The Institute on the Holocaust and Genocide (Jerusalem), the
Institute for the Study of Genocide (NYC) have affirmed the
historical fact of the Armenian Genocide.

6) Leading texts in the international law of genocide such as
William A. Schabas’s Genocide in International Law (Cambridge
University Press, 2000) cite the Armenian Genocide as a precursor
to the Holocaust and as a precedent for the law on crimes against
humanity.

We note that there may be differing interpretations of genocide –
how and why the Armenian Genocide happened, but to deny its factual
and moral reality as genocide is not to engage in scholarship but
in propaganda and efforts to absolve the perpetrator, blame the
victims, and erase the ethical meaning of this history.

We would also note that scholars who advise your government and who
are affiliated in other ways with your state-controlled
institutions are not impartial. Such so-called “scholars” work to
serve the agenda of historical and moral obfuscation when they
advise you and the Turkish Parliament on how to deny the Armenian
Genocide.

We believe that it is clearly in the interest of the Turkish people
and their future as a proud and equal participant in international,
democratic discourse to acknowledge the responsibility of a
previous government for the genocide of the Armenian people, just
as the German government and people have done in the case of the
Holocaust.

Sincerely,

[signed]
Robert Melson
Professor of Political Science
President, International Association of Genocide Scholars

[signed]
Israel Charny
Vice President, International Association of Genocide Scholars
Editor in Chief, Encyclopedia of Genocide

[signed]
Peter Balakian
Donald M. and Constance H. Rebar Professor of the Humanities
Colgate University

www.anca.org

EU, US to help Armenian nuclear plant step up security

EU, US to help Armenian nuclear plant step up security

Arminfo
18 Apr 05

Yerevan, 18 April: The Armenian Nuclear Power Plant will be suspended
for planned repairs and refuelling on 15 September 2005, the general
director of the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant closed-type joint-stock
company, Gagik Markosyan, has told Arminfo.

The plant will stay idle for 45 days, he said. The European Union
will allocate 4m euros for a project on enhancing security at the
plant. The funds will be used to set up the first ever automated
system of chemical control at the plant and on some other measures.
Significant work will also be carried out in cooperation with the US
Energy Department towards stepping up security at the plant, while
Russia has undertaken to provide it with the necessary volumes of fuel.

In 2004, the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant increased power generation
by 26 per cent and its output totalled 2.4bn kWh. Power production at
the plant is planned to be 2.528bn kWh in 2005, which will be possible
by reducing the time of the plant’s suspension from the routine 65
days to 45 days. The Armenian nuclear plant consists of two energy
units with the 400 MW capacity each.

[Passage omitted: background]

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress