BAKU: Istanbul Prosecutor filed suit vs Catholicos of all Armenians

TREND, Azerbaijan
June 30 2006
Istanbul Prosecutor’s Office field lawsuit against Catholicos of all Armenians

Source: Trend
Author: R. Abdullayev

30.06.2006

Istanbul Prosecutor’s Office has filed a lawsuit against Garegin II,
Catholicos of all Armenians as per the Article “encroachment on Turks
dignity”. Trendreports with reference to Turkish media that during
his visit to Istanbul Armenian Catholicos announced the necessity in
recognition of fake “Armenian genocide”, which resulted in complaint
lawyers group dispatched to the prosecutor’s office.
It is noted that it is not possible to take evidences of Garegin II
himself as there is no agreement on legal cooperation between Turkey
and Armenia. However, in case the prosecutor’s office considers this
necessary, it can assign all country’s checkpoints to immediately
apprehend Catholicos as soon as he visits Turkey again.

BAKU: US Ambassador to Armenia refuses to say "Armenian genocide"

Today, Azerbaijan
June 30 2006
US Ambassador to Armenia refuses to say “Armenian genocide”

30 June 2006 [11:00] – Today.Az

New US Ambassador to Armenia Richard Hoagland has taken up his
duties. Former US Ambassador to Armenia John Evans was discharged
after he claimed his recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide.

According to APA, the Senate confirmed Richard Hoagland as
Ambassador. Prior to this post, Hoagland was US extraordinary and
plenipotentiary Ambassador to Tajikistan.
Before the voting in the Senate, pan-Armenian senators George Allen,
Norm Coleman and Paul Sarbanes said the earlier recall of the
previous Ambassador John Evans caused dissatisfaction in Armenia.
Claiming that the United States should recognize the “Armenian
genocide”, these senators demanded the new Ambassador Hoagland to
make assessment of the 1915 events. Despite insistence of the
senators, Hoagland did not use the expression “Armenian genocide” in
his speech.
“President Bush assessed the 1915 events as unforgettable tragic
events. I represent the President and share his opinions,” Richard
Hoagland said.
Hoagland also said he will try to implement projects on regional
cooperation among Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia during his
new mission.
The previous US Ambassador to Armenia John Evans was recalled on
March 7 this year. The newspaper “California Courier” writes it was
due to his statement on the policy of genocide against Armenians by
the Ottoman Empire.
In his meeting with Armenian community in San Francisco a year ago,
John Evans pointed out possibility of recognizing the so-called
Armenian genocide. Seeing this statement sparked serious
dissatisfaction, Evans told a news conference in US Embassy that his
statement was unofficially made and does not represent his country’s
official position.
“At the meeting with Armenian community, I told that US position
regarding the Armenian tragedy remains the same. I used the word
“genocide” that time but this word belongs to me-John Evans only, not
a politician. But I must admit my statements were out of place,” the
Ambassador said.

URL:

G-8 FMs call for prompt resolution of Balkans

Serbianna.com, Michigan
June 30 2006
G-8 FMs call for prompt resolution of Balkans
Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:26 AM
MOSCOW-Foreign ministers from the Group of Eight major industrialized
nations on Thursday called for a prompt resolution to regional
conflicts that continue to plague some ex-Soviet territories and
Balkan countries.
In a joint statement, diplomats called for the ex-Soviet South
Caucasus states of Armenia and Azerbaijan to reach an agreement this
year on the long and bitterly disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh.
“We call on Azerbaijan and Armenia to show political will with the
aim to reach an agreement this year and prepare their peoples for
peace and not for war,” the document said.
Nagorno-Karabakh is inside Azerbaijan, but is populated mostly by
ethnic Armenians, who have run it and seven contiguous districts
since an uneasy 1994 cease-fire ended six years of full-scale war.
Sporadic border clashes regularly break out. The unresolved conflict
has held up development in the strategic region.
The ministers also urged a solution for the Serbian province, Kosovo.
The ethnic Albanian majority want to become independent, but the Serb
minority wants it to remain part of Serbia.
“We welcomed the launch of direct Belgrade-Pristina talks and in this
regard we urge the parties, including the Kosovo Serbs, to negotiate
in good faith and make every effort to reach a negotiated agreement,”
the ministers said.
“We underline that Kosovo must remain multiethnic. The Kosovo
leadership should

Nairobi: Revealed: How NSIS cleared Armenians

The Standard, Kenya
June 30 2006
Revealed: How NSIS cleared Armenians

By Biketi Kikechi and Patrick Mathangani
The National Security Intelligence Services (NSIS) gave a clean bill
of health to the alleged Artur brothers, whose real identities are
now a mystery.
Yet it wasn’t just the NSIS, Kenya’s own equivalent of the United
States Federal Investigations Bureau (FBI) and Britain’s MI6, which
slept on the job; three other Government agencies, which also play
the role of security watchdogs, merely opened their doors wide to the
duo, now believed to be international crooks on the run.

Principal Immigration Officer, Joseph Ndathi, displays the travelling
documents belonging to Artur Margaryan at the Kiruki Commission of
Inquiry at the Kenyatta International Conference Centre on Thursday.
Pic by Jacob Otieno

It has also emerged, at the commission of inquiry into the bogus
Artur Margaryan and Artur Sargasyan, that even when their moment of
disgrace came and they had to be “kicked” out of the country, they
still enjoyed luxury of choice, a rare thing for deportees.
In the end, even as they boarded an Emirates plane to Dubai – a
destination they had the luxury to choose – they left no doubt as to
the extent to which they had compromised Kenya’s security apparatus.
To crown the scandal, the bogus Margaryan checked out as Arthur
Gevorkiyan with a Russian passport, also believed to be forged, and
the police and Immigration officials just let him be.
Emergency certificate of travel
On that day, Sargasyan, the sunglass bedecked one who always passed
for Margaryan’s sibling – claimed not to have a passport, even a
forged one.
But the Immigration Department was again at his beck-and-call,
processing for him an emergency certificate of travel that should
only have been valid for the day he flew out.
However, the document, which indicated he was on a business trip to
the United Arab Emirates, was valid for an entire month, contrary to
the law. The Immigration Department came under increasing scrutiny at
the Commission of Inquiry on Thursday when it emerged that foreigners
can, in fact, present forged documents and be issued with Kenyan
passports and other permits.
The commission heard that the NSIS, which should have ascertained
whether or not the mysterious foreigners had criminal records, simply
gave them a clean bill of health.
Another top Government organ – an inter-ministerial committee to boot
– sat at Nyayo House gave the foreigners a green light as investors.
And so did the Criminal Investigations Department (CID), which was
supposed to provide a certificate of good conduct before permits
could be issued.
It was, however, not clear from the evidence whether the security
lapse by the NSIS was deliberate. NSIS conducts investigations for
security clearance of persons who hold or may hold sensitive posts or
have access to sensitive information.
Brothers registered a company
On Thursday, Principal Immigration Officer Joseph Kathuri Ndathi took
to the floor as the Kiruki Commission of Inquiry entered its second
day and revealed that the Arturs got entry permits with the approval
of the NSIS, whose role was to conduct security vetting.
Ndathi told the commission he first got to learn about the presence
of the Armenians in the country on January 23, while processing their
entry permits.
It also emerged that the alleged brothers registered a company,
Brotherlink International Ltd, long before they got entry permits.
“We don’t undertake verification on documents forwarded to us by
applicants unless we suspect they are criminals,” said Ndathi.
Among the details in their application forms were Personal
Identification Numbers (PIN) from the Kenya Revenue Authority, where
they had presented themselves as civil servants. They presented the
firm’s incorporation documents to justify their request for the
permits.
The evidence was adduced after documents were tabled to show the
alleged brothers travelled to Kenya and processed their business
documents using forged documents.
Said Ndathi: “We did not verify the authenticity of their passports
or bank statements produced to support their application because we
don’t do that”.
He blamed the department’s ineptitude on a “serious shortage of staff
and the high number of applications” they receive everyday.
Interpol reported criminal dealings
The NSIS failed to notice that Artur Margaryan’s passport number
AB0322223 had been reported lost in Armenia. Interpol Armenia also
reported in March that Artur Sargasyan lost his passport number
AF0599780 that was replaced, and yet the same passport number had
been approved as valid by the NSIS, according to Ndathi’s evidence.
Ndathi’s mitigation was that he would have declared the permit void,
arrested, prosecuted and later deported the alleged brothers had the
fraud been exposed. He agreed with Assisting Counsel Warui Mungai
that the entry permits were never cancelled despite the publicity
surrounding their activities.
“They were only cancelled on June 9, 2006, the day they were deported
and that means they were valid until that date,” said Ndathi.
Interpol Armenia first reported the criminal dealings of the two
foreigners to their Kenyan counterparts on March 18, 2006. Artur,
whose real identity remains a mystery, stole the passport from Artur
Margaryan who still works in Yerevan as a tax collector.
Ndathi admitted that the passport his officers received from
Margaryan was the one Armenian police had said was lost and
cancelled. He confirmed that the department solely depended on the
documents presented by the Armenians and NSIS’s approval.
Commission chairman Shedrach Kiruki was keen to know from the witness
why he never saw anything peculiar in the Armenians despite the
hullabaloo about them.
“My lords, I didn’t see anything peculiar and it is only now that we
are seeing that the documents given to us were fake,” replied Ndathi.
Potential threats to local security
The NSIS is responsible for identifying potential threats to local
security and advising the President on action to be taken. It also
carries out investigations for security clearance of persons with
access to sensitive information.
NSIS is tasked with advising the Government of any security threats,
and taking steps towards protecting the country and its people.
NSIS, formerly known as the Special Branch, was created in 1952 and
operated under the Commissioner of Police. It acted as a secret
intelligence unit for the colonial government during the Mau Mau
uprising.
In 1963, the Special Branch was delinked from the police and it was
not until 1969 that a presidential charter defined its functions. It
was later transformed into the Directorate of Security Intelligence
through a presidential charter in 1986.
The institution became infamous at the peak of the one-party rule in
the 1980s. Its agents were used in holding and torturing individuals
who were perceived to be anti-government. After local and
international outcry, NSIS was created in January 1999, with the
enactment of the National Security Intelligence Service Act.
Brig (Rtd) Wilson Boinett was appointed NSIS Director-General in 1999
and it was during his tenure that the outfit transformed itself into
a professionally run intelligence service. The current head of NSIS
is a military officer, Michael Gichangi.

Nairobi: Artur brothers `were to be deported to Armenia’

The Standard, Kenya
June 30 2006
Artur brothers `were to be deported to Armenia’

By Biketi Kikechi and Patrick Mathangani
The following are excerpts from Thursday’s examination of witness
number two, Joseph Kathuri Ndathi, the Principal Immigration Officer,
by Kiruki Commission assisting counsel Warui Mungai.
Mungai: My lords, appearance as yesterday and we are ready to
continue.
Kiruki: Mr Ndathi, let me remind you that you are still on oath,
proceed.
Mungai: Is it possible to use a deportation order that is not
cancelled to travel back to the country?

A bird’s eye view of the Kiruki Commission of inquiry sitting at the
Kenyatta International Conference Centre, Nairobi, on Thursday. Pic
by Jacob Otieno

Ndathi: My lords, whether this documents is cancelled or not, it is
not practical for you to go to another country and then that country
allows you to come back. It is internationally accepted that it is a
one-way document and to me whether you cancel it or not, it is not
possible to return while using it.
Mungai: What about the air ticket? Who must request that?
Ndathi: In circumstances where a traveller has an air ticket, he
would be allowed to use it, but in a situation where you don’t have
money, the Government is bound to prepare a ticket for you to be
deported.
Ndathi: So, the Government buys the ticket and gives you?
Ndathi: Yes, the Government will buy the ticket but at that time you
are not a free person. So either immigration officers or police
officers will escort you to the airport and hand over your ticket to
the carrier.
Mungai: Is it possible for the Government to buy you a return ticket?
Ndathi: That will be a miracle. They don’t deport you because you are
wanted.
Kiruki: Can a person who has been deported from this country go and
return?
Ndathi: Mr chairman, I have said he can return illegally and as I
have already explained there are people who travel by air all the way
from Bombay to Entebbe before crossing back into the country by road.
Mungai: Is there any provision in the Act?
Ndathi: There is a provision and it is true the minister can revoke
the order.
Mungai: Let us now deal with the Artur brothers. When did you first
learn about the presence of these people in the country?
Ndathi: I think, my lords from a practical point of view, when you
are at the headquarters it is not possible to get all the information
about who and who is entering the country unless there are specific
issues that are required. But having said that, I think although we
had handled their documents prior to when they started appearing in
the newspaper I cannot tell the Commission that those were the kind
of people we were dealing with. But according to our records, they
came into the country last year.
Kiruki: When?
Ndathi: My lords, my officer from the airport will come to give
specific dates.
Mungai: I want your opinion. When did you first learn of their
presence here?
Ndathi: My lords, I can specifically say, it is from the day we
issued these two brothers with entry permits.
Mungai: Do you remember the date?
Ndathi: Yes, it was on January 23rd.
Mungai: Last year?
Ndathi: No, on January 23rd this year.
Kiruki: That is when you first heard about it?
Ndathi: That is when we issued them with entry permits and at that
particular time there were no issues about the brothers.
Kiruki: When you issued them with entry permits, did you issue them
with the `R’ number?
Ndathi: They were issued with an `R’ number, their file was vetted
like other files by NSIS, they were issued with requisition, their
file was summarised, the application was forwarded to the ministerial
committee. It was then approved and paid for.
Mungai: That is fine. Let us now look at the press release that I
took the minister through yesterday. The minister said he received
information from the immigration department. Did you pass such
information to the minister?
Ndathi: My lords, I remember it was the time when I accompanied the
minister on an official trip to Western region. The press people met
the minister after he arrived that morning from his rural
constituency.
I recall him saying, `I have just come from my constituency. What I
can tell you is what I have just read from the newspaper. These
people could be Czechs, Armenians or Russians.’
We later called Nairobi to confirm their nationality and based on the
records held in the files those people were Armenians.
Mungai: I want to show you two files marked 1B and 1C. Did the
information you gave the minister come from those files?
Ndathi: My lord commissioners, yes. The information in folio says
their nationality was Republic of Armenia and that is the information
I gave to the minister.
Mungai: Did you confirm with Armenia that they were their citizens
before giving the minister that information?
Ndathi: Not our office.
Mungai: Your office relies entirely on the information provided by
the applicant, is that so?
Ndathi: Yes.
Mungai: Confirm to the commissioners whether the procedures that they
followed were proper?
Ndathi: My lords, to the best of my knowledge, that was the standard
procedure.
Mungai: I want us to go through the files with you. You can have one.
I have one.
Ndathi: Yes, my lords.
Mungai: Let us look at folio one. That is the personal identification
for a company by the name Brother Link International Ltd. Have you
seen it?
Ndathi: Yes, my lords.
Mungai: Was their any verification of the PIN (Personal
Identification Number) before your department accepted the same?
Ndathi: My lords, we don’t undertake verification on documents that
are forwarded to us by applicants unless we suspect that whoever is
bringing the documents is a criminal.
Kiruki: Mr PIO you have been having that file when people have been
making a lot of kelele (noise). Did you notice anything peculiar
about that applicant?
Ndathi: My lords, I wouldn’t say I have seen anything peculiar,
because all the requirements on a permit application are basically
there.
Kiruki: Up to now?
Ndathi: It is now that discoveries are being made that these
documents are basically fake.
Kiruki: At what stage did you know that some of the information given
to you could be not true?
Ndathi: I think until at the time when police reported to us that
these people were dangerous fellows and they required to be deported.
Kiruki: Was that brought to your attention?
Ndathi: Yes, that was on 9th of this month.
Kiruki: You didn’t know before that there was anything wrong with
these people?
Ndathi: My lords, we never had any problems with those people before
that.
Kiruki: Carry on please.
Mungai: Let us go to folio two where we have particulars for
incorporation for the same company. Did you verify the authenticity
of that document from the Registrar of Companies?
Ndathi: My lords, I can say it wasn’t done because there is no
evidence that it was done.
Mungai: So you didn’t know who were the directors and the
shareholders of that company?
Ndathi: The details of the shareholders are indicated in the
application.
Mungai: But did you check?
Ndathi: My lords, what I’m saying is that when you forward an
application, you enclose required documents.
Mungai: That verification was not done, is that so?
Ndathi: The verification of an application form is not mandatory.
Mungai: I want to refer you to a document here, which was referred to
by the minister yesterday. (Reads a report by Interpol, which
indicated the Arturs travelled on stolen passports.) Had you seen
this report before?
Ndathi: My lords before I answer that, I require a clarification.
This report emanated from Interpol of which country?
Mungai: Open the next page. You can see on top there at the top. It
was in Nairobi as of March 18.
Ndathi: My lords I’m seeing this report for the first time.
Mungai: Look at the report where Interpol in Armenia has said
`Margaryan Artur’. It says a person by the name Artur Sargasyan who
is in Armenia received a passport number AF0599780. And it is said
not to have left Armenia.
Ndathi: It is the same number.
Mungai: Again had you received that letter, what would you have done?
Ndathi: The permit would have been declared void, the person ought to
have been arrested and taken to court.
Mungai: Let’s now come to the deportation order signed by the
minister. We heard from the minister yesterday that he received a
request from you that he signs deportation orders. Is it correct that
you gave that information?
Ndathi: My lords it’s correct. On the 9th of this month, I did
receive communication from the commissioner and his staff that these
four persons must be deported by the end of the day.
Mungai: How did you receive the communication?
Ndathi: It was on telephone and he did send his senior deputy
commissioner to his office, Mr Kimaiyo, who came accompanied by PCIO
Nairobi area and DCIO Central and discussed the modalities. We
decided they were dangerous criminals who must be deported. On
receiving that information, I went to the minister’s office, I
briefed him that on the way they had been appearing on the national
papers there appeared to be serious security issues that are being
raised by the Commissioner of Police.
Mungai: Were there any particular issues which had necessitated that
request?
Ndathi: My lords, my officer had made a request on the telephone
although later he prepared a small brief that they had caused a
fracas at the airport within customs area although they had already
left. I also got information that they had been arrested in the wee
hours of the night.
Mungai: What action did you take?
Ndathi: I briefed my minister and he agreed they were a security
concern. We agreed to prepare a deportation order. They were signed
by the minister and executed accordingly.
Mungai: Look at the deportation order again, that of Artur Margaryan.
Where was he supposed to be deported to?
Ndathi: They were supposed to have been deported to Armenia.
Mungai: We have information that they were deported to Dubai. What
necessitated that?
Ndathi: They did indicate that they are residents of Dubai, where
they were staying and had their businesses.
The law is very clear. It says a person who an order is given shall
be removed to the place where he came or with the approval of the
minister to a country where he belongs.
These people had come from Dubai, and they requested to be taken
where they came from and the law allows that.
The hearing continues.

Nairobi: Raila and Nyong’o demand minister’s sacking

The Standard, Kenya
June 30 2006
Raila and Nyong’o demand minister’s sacking
By David Ohito
Legislators Raila Odinga and Anyang’ Nyong’o have challenged the
Government to sack Cabinet ministers John Michuki and Gideon
Konchella over their roles in the Armenian brothers saga.
Raila said the Government would only redeem itself and prove it was
genuine in its investigations by sacking the ministers mentioned in
the saga. He said Kenyans had lost confidence in the ministers.
Said Nyong’o: “It confirms President Kibaki’s government needs an
external force to keep it in power, having lost the political support
of the people of Kenya”.
Michuki is the Internal Security minister and Konchella is his
Immigration counterpart. Raila, who is Lang’ata MP, said when he
raised the flag on the bogus Artur Margaryan and Artur Sargasyan,
Michuki accused him of being a self-seeker who wanted political
mileage out of the saga.
“Michuki and Konchella have no business holding ministerial positions
after protecting criminals and aiding them in their activities, they
should have quit long ago,” said Raila.
Criminal record
“Michuki defended the Arturs as investors and asked me to keep off.
Now the truth is coming out and the Government is merely engaging in
a public relations exercise to blackmail Kenyans,” added Raila.
He wondered why the Government had decided to investigate the saga
long after Interpol informed it that Margaryan had a criminal record.
“The brothers committed crimes and breached security at the Jomo
Kenyatta International Airport, but they were still escorted by
Government details. What moral authority do they have to investigate
the Armenians?” he asked.
He said the duo should have been put on the dock to face criminal
charges in Kenya before being deported. The MPs were attending an
education conference in Kisumu.
Raila challenged Michuki and Konchella to resign to pave way for
investigations.
“The Government is on a desperate cosmetic attempt to clean itself
from the revelations that the brothers were criminals,” Raila said.

Nairobi: Passports mix-up in panic to expel Arturs

The Nation, Kenya
June 30 2006
Passports mix-up in panic to expel Arturs
Story by LUCAS BARASA and MUGUMO MUNENE
Publication Date: 6/30/2006
The Armenian Artur brothers were mistakenly given return air tickets
in the panic to get them kicked out of Kenya, it was revealed
yesterday.
The tickets were about to be handed over with take-off just 30
minutes away, when the error was spotted and the return part of the
tickets was ripped out, the inquiry into the brothers’ activities was
told.
And as a whirlwind of activity went on around them to ensure they got
on the plane in time, Artur Margaryan was allowed to travel on
someone else’s passport – that of a Russian called Gevorkiyan – while
his supposed brother Sargsyan who had no passport was given emergency
travel papers.
Bizarrely, instead of saying he was being expelled, the document
merely stated he was going to Dubai on business which meant Mr
Sargsyan could legally claim he was never deported. And it was
wrongly dated, too: July 9 instead of June 9, the inquiry was told.
Because the paper, known as a Certificate of Emergency Travel, said
Mr Sargsyan was travelling on business and there are still 10 days to
go until July 9, he could in theory use it to return to Kenya, the
inquiry heard.
And in a day of dramatic disclosures, it was also claimed that the
brothers were cleared to work in Kenya by both the Immigration
Department and the National Security Intelligence Service, which
vetted their work permit applications.
The series of revelations rocked the second day of the inquiry into
the two Armenians, described the previous day by Immigration minister
Gideon Konchella as “dubious international criminals.”
Mr Sargsyan’s emergency travel papers showed he was either Armenian
or Russian, the inquiry at Kenyatta International Conference Centre
was told by its second witness, principal immigration officer Joseph
Ndathi.
Asked why the certificate did not read ‘deportation’, Mr Ndathi
replied, “it is a question of language semantics.” He explained: “He
was going to Dubai where he had come from to continue with his
business.”
Asked by assisting counsel Warui Mungai if Mr Sargsyan could claim he
was not deported, Mr Ndathi said, “he will be within his rights to do
so.”
He said it was the deportation orders and the systems put in place to
prevent the Artur brothers from re-entering Kenya that mattered most.
Mr Mungai told Mr Ndathi investigations also showed the Artur
brothers were given return air tickets. Mr Ndathi replied that the
four Kenya Airways tickets – including two for two other people
deported with the brothers – were delivered by lawyer Kamau Mbugua
and two other unidentified people.
“My lords, they were return tickets but the officers scrutinised and
the return coupons were removed. They left with a one-way ticket,”
the immigration officer said.
The tickets were bought using taxpayers money, in spite of the law
allowing the Government to ask wealthy people to pay for their own
travel.
On the deportation date the lawyer, Mr Mbugua also handed Mr Ndathi a
passport in the name of Mr Arthur Gevorkiyan for use by Mr Artur
Margaryan, the taller and bearded brother. It was this passport,
showing Mr Gevorkiyan as a Russian, that Mr Margaryan used to travel
to Dubai.
Mr Ndathi had a hard time explaining to the commission why Mr
Margaryan was allowed to travel using a passport that was not in his
own name. He said that there were only 30 minutes to the flight and
that Kenya Airways had agreed to the arrangement.
“The security of the State should be seen as of greater concern than
a travel document. The passport was also accepted in Dubai,” Mr
Ndathi said.
A photograph in a copy of Mr Margaryan’s passport tabled before the
Commission was different from that in Mr Gevorkiyan’s passport.
He said the certificate of emergency travel were recognised
internationally as one-way travel documents and anyone found re-using
one could be fined.
Mr Mungai: Must the deportee have a passport?
Mr Ndathi: It is one of the documents one must have. If not, we issue
an emergency travel certificate.
Mr Ndathi said the true nationalities of the Artur brothers were
unknown and that his department had relied on information given to
them to conclude they were Armenians. “They have given conflicting
documents and we need to research these people further,” he said.
He said the Arturs had never applied for Kenyan citizenship and that
Kenyan passports recovered from their Runda home were stolen from the
Immigration department in May. Another passport stolen on May 2, was
still missing. He said Kenyan passports could only be granted to
foreigners with entry permits who had been in the country for at
least five years. Records show the Arturs first came to Kenya last
year.
A passport in the name of Artak Sargsyan recovered from the Runda
residence showed the holder was a Kenyan. And although the name was
slightly different from another passport found there, which
identified him as Artur and not Artak, the photographs in the two
passports were the same. Immigration records showed the stolen
passports belonged to Selasio Njeru Mutumuka and Edith Kahaya
Asegere.
Assisting counsel Dorcas Oduor said signatures in the recovered
passports had been taken for forensic examination. Mr Ndathi said
Kenyan passports were susceptible to having the photographs switched.
He blamed problems facing the Immigration department to under
funding, staff shortage and poor technological advancement. He said
the department received little support from the Treasury and relied
on part of its revenue collection, whose total was Sh1.8 billion last
year, for development, operations, and staff pay and allowances.
Its efforts to upgrade its information communication technology were
hampered by the Anglo Leasing scandal, Mr Ndathi said.
It also came to light that the country’s Intelligence and
Immigrations officials fell for suspect official documents presented
by the Armenian brothers.
The commission was told the brothers were cleared by both the
National Security Intelligence Service and the Immigration Department
to conduct business in Kenya. The clearance was given following a
request made by the Immigration department in keeping with their
tradition of having every request for an entry permit checked before
foreigners were allowed into the country.
The Armenians were finally issued with two-year permits on January 23
this year. They were cancelled after the two were deported.

Reception in honor of NKR delegation held at Capitol, USA

Arka News Agency, Armenia
June 30 2006
RECEPTION IN HONOR OF NKR DELEGATION HELD AT CAPITOL, USA
YEREVAN, June 30. /ARKA/. A reception in the honor of the
Nagorno-Karabakh delegation was held at the Capitol. The reception
was attended by US Congressmen, RA Ambassador to the USA Tatul
Margaryan, NKR Permanent Representative to the USA Vardan Barseghyan,
top officials of the Armenian Assembly of America (AAA) and Armenian
National Committee of America, US Congress staff members, journalists
and representatives of the Armenian community.
The US Congress members Frank Pallone, Joe Nolenberg, Edward Royce,
Caroline Malone, Adam Shiff and Brad Sherman made speeches at the
reception. They warmly welcomed Speaker of the NKR National Assembly
Ashot Ghulyan and NKR Foreign Minister Georgy Petrosyan.
Condemning Azerbaijan’s aggressive policy, the US Congressmen
reaffirmed their readiness to contribute to the development of the
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR).
In their turn, the NKR officials conveyed the NKR’s people’s
gratitude the US Congress and to the American people for their
commitment to such eternal values as freedom and democracy as well as
for the humanitarian aid provided to the NKR.
Artsakh knowingly chose the way of freedom and democracy and no
obstacles will make it turn aside from this way, Ghulyan said.
Following the reception the NKR delegation held a meeting with the
Co-Chairmen of the US Congressional Armenia Caucus Frank Pallone and
Joe Nolenberg.
The sides discussed issues related to the current socio-economic
situation in the NKR, the country’s democratic development, US aid to
the NKR and Nagorno-Karabakh peace process. P.T. -0–
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

LAPD Looking For Man Who Robbed Van Nuys Bank

CBS 2, CA
June 30 2006
LAPD Looking For Man Who Robbed Van Nuys Bank
(CBS) VAN NUYS, Calif. A man with a two-inch scar on his upper left
cheek robbed a Bank of America in Van Nuys Friday, took about $1,000
and escaped in a taxi cab, police said.
The bandit walked into the bank in the 6500 block of Van Nuys
Boulevard at about 10:20 a.m. and “simulated a handgun” when
demanding cash, Officer Sara Faden of the Los Angeles Police
Department’s Media Relations section said.
He ran out of the bank and jumped into a yellow taxi, Faden said.
No injuries were reported in the holdup.
Police described the suspect as a white, Middle Eastern or possibly
Armenian man whose dark hair is streaked with gray. He is believed to
be 50 to 56 years old, 5 feet 8 inches tall and about 170 pounds with
brown eyes.
Police asked anyone with information to call the LAPD’s 24-hour tip
line at 1-877-LAWFULL.

Writer to deliver paper on Graves in Mallorca

Kent Good Times Dispatch, CT
June 30 2006
Writer to deliver paper on Graves in Mallorca
A work begun long ago will find an outlet this summer when Georgianne
Ensign Kent presents a paper, “Poet to Poet: T.E. Lawrence and the
Riddle of S.A.,” at the Robert Graves Conference in Palma, Mallorca,
in July.

The theme of the conference, sponsored by the Robert Graves Trust, is
“Robert Graves and His Collaborators.”
Ms. Kent, who has made Kent her home since 1991, said she was first
attracted to the story of T. E. Lawrence, the impossibly enigmatic
hero of a World War I “Arabian Nights” adventure, after the film,
“Lawrence of Arabia” was produced in 1962. “I was looking for an idea
for a book,” she said succinctly, adding that she wanted to present
an existential view of the largely medieval Lawrence.
“Existentialism was hot back then, but by the time I finished the
book it was not so hot,” she observed wryly.
Still, researching the book brought her to Dorset, England, a place
she came to love so much she returned there to work on a second book.
The Lawrence project gave her an opportunity to have discourse with
the poet Robert Graves, and it introduced her to the worlds of
archaeology and the Middle East.
Graves, was her first outlet. Born in Wimbledon, England in 1885,
educated at Oxford and equally at home as a writer of fiction,
non-fiction and poetry, he was both friend and biographer to T.E.
Lawrence. It was to Graves that Lawrence turned for criticism of his
dedicatory poem in “Seven Pillars of Wisdom” and it was to Graves
that Ms. Kent turned for insight into her subject.
Ms. Kent’s paper, which details Graves’ rewriting of a verse of
Lawrence’s poem and the mystery of the identity of the person to whom
it was written, will include a correspondence that she conducted with
the English poet.
“Lawrence sent his poem to Graves and asked him if it were poetry or
prose,” Ms. Kent said, adding that Graves gave an equivocal answer.
“He rewrote one of the stanzas and sent it back to Lawrence. It was
very beautiful,” said Ms. Kent. “Of course, that was not what
Lawrence wanted and he didn’t use it.”
Graves apparently retained his reservations about Lawrence’s poetic
abilities. When Ms. Kent later asked him if he considered Lawrence to
be a poet, he replied yes, “not for what he wrote, but for the way he
lived.”
Graves was nevertheless a friend of Lawrence’s and profited from the
association. Lawrence sent him truncated chapters of “Seven Pillars
of Wisdom,” his account of the war in the desert, for Graves to
publish during a period of financial need. And Graves later wrote
“Lawrence and the Arabs,” a successful biography of the warrior.
In return, Graves was protective of his friend’s legacy. When
Lawrence’s sole surviving brother sought to stop the production of
“Ross,” a play that depicted Lawrence as homosexual and sadistic,
Graves joined in the battle.
Ms. Kent eventually dropped the Lawrence book and moved on to other
projects, later publishing three works under her maiden name: “The
Hunt for the Mastodon,” “Great Beginnings: Opening Lines of Great
Novels,” and “Great Endings: Closing Lines of Great Novels.”
It was not until much later, when she was participating in an
archaeological dig in Mallorca, that the path of her life crossed
Graves’ again. “I was on a dig in Mallorca where he lived and I
wanted to see his house,” she related. “It was inhabited by his
widow, but she died before I got there. So I wrote to his oldest son,
William, who said the house was going to become a museum, but that he
would show it to me. I had the amazing good fortune to be shown
Graves’ house by his son.”
During that tour she told William Graves of her correspondence with
his father about Lawrence and he suggested her participation in the
upcoming conference.
Ms. Kent said that the passage of decades required her to go back and
prepare her Lawrence material again. “I did a lot of research,” she
said. “Last year I was in Oxford and did some work at the Bodleian
Library [the main research library at the university].”
The work on her Lawrence paper temporarily put on hold her most
recent project, a biography of her Armenian grandmother, Vartanoosh,
which will be published later this summer.
Here, again, other interests have grown in fields sown by her early
Lawrence research. “Lawrence introduced me to England, to archaeology
and to the Middle East,” she said. “I wouldn’t have gone to the
Middle East when I did or to the places I went, if it were not for
Lawrence.”
The story the Armenians, a culture that suffered genocide during
World War I, and of her family’s emigration to the United States
struck an emotional chord with her. She began to research her family
background, spending a month with her aged grandmother in Florida,
taping her memories of the past.
“My grandmother came to this country in the late 1880s after first
escaping to Beirut,” she recounted. “I stayed with her for a month,
taping her memories-some of which she embroidered. I started with
that, but then I would check the stories on the Internet and many
have turned out to be right. For instance, there were rumors of a
possible massacre in Beirut, so they moved inland to a town called
Zhale. She described how the houses were built one on top of the
other. I found a picture of the town on the Internet and the houses
were exactly as she described them. She was a really dynamic woman.”
Ms. Kent said she will self-publish the book, titled “Vartanoosh,”
and expects its main distribution to be among the extended family.
Ms. Kent studied journalism at Northwestern University, expecting to
pursue a career in magazine writing. She found herself sidetracked
into advertising, however, and spent 25 years-“broken up by decisions
to go write books”-in that field. Eventually she left advertising
altogether and worked for a while in a medical office, a position
that she loved.
“Then I met my husband and moved her in 1991,” she said. While in
Kent she penned her two anthologies of first and last great lines.
She said her current goal is to complete her book on her grandmother.
“I have other ideas [for future works], but nothing that has
crystallized yet,” she said.