Armenian Marxists on Karabakh problem’s solution: “all or nothing”

Armenian Marxists on Karabakh problem’s solution: “all or nothing”

Regnum, Russia
March 17 2006

“Forthcoming meeting of co-Chairs of OSCE Minsk Group on Nagorno
Karabakh conflict settlement, to be held in Istanbul on March 20,
gives new negotiating possibilities, and it is unworthy to expect
anything else,” stated Chairman of Armenian Christian-Democratic Union,
ex-Speaker Khosrov Arutyunyan at a news conference.

As a REGNUM correspondent informs, according to him,” results of
negotiations in Rambouillet, better to say – their absence, confirmed
fact, that anybody of parties was not ready to compromise.

Negotiation’s mediators were ready for such result.” “Despite fact,
that Azerbaijan announced more then once inadmissibility of concessions
from his side, continuation of the long-drawn process is possible
only through compromises. We have even to exclude idea on possible
military solution of the problem,” stated Arutyunyan. At the same
time, he stressed, that official Yerevan, “convincing international
community of readiness to compromise, must not forget to remind to
it, that the readiness is caused not by fear of war, but by wish to
settle question peacefully.” “Rejection of talks is proclaiming of war
against international community. However, status quo is now dangerous
for both Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh. If one has been considering
events since 1994, so 2006 is most favorable to settle Nagorno Karabakh
problem. And we have to use the chance,” added Khosrov Arutyunyan.

Mentioning integration of Nagorno Karabakh into negotiating process
on conflict settlement, Khosrov Arutyunyan pointed out, that NK
for international community is not intermediate link of the chain,
but practically a main one – “it an undisputable question. Without
acceptance of right of Nagorno Karabakh people on self-determination
no decisions and agreements may be taken.” Mentioning some countries,
interested in Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement, the ex-speaker
in particular stated:” USA diplomatically request to settle Karabakh
conflict, and Russia wish decently to help.”

In his turn, Chairman of the Armenian Marxist Party David Akopyan
stated, that all possible compromises are exhausted within the
framework of conflict settlement. “At present, one has to act
according to everything or nothing principle,” stated he. According
to his prognosis, “pan-American hegemony” will end and “Russia will
join the conflict” in 2007. Also, he stated that no documents on
Karabakh conflict settlement will be signed in 2006, and question
of Nagorno Karabakh status will be solved only by next Armenian
president. “Present authorities are unable to achieve such solution,”
believes David Akopyan. Mentioning forthcoming meeting of co-Chairs of
OSCE Minsk Group, to be held in Istanbul on March 20, chief Armenian
Marxist proclaimed: “Hope for the best, be prepared for the worst!”

Ukraine concludes WTO talks with Armenia, Columbia

Ukraine concludes WTO talks with Armenia, Columbia
16:44 | 17/ 03/ 2006

RIA Novosti, Russia
March 17 2006

KIEV, March 17 (RIA Novosti, Olga Bernatskaya) – Ukraine has concluded
talks with Armenia and Columbia in its bid to join the World Trade
Organization, the country’s economics minister said Friday.

“We have concluded the WTO accession talks with Armenia and Columbia,”
Arseniy Yatsenyuk said, adding that there have also been positive
developments in the negotiations with Australia.

The minister said that the country’s hopes about accelerating the
negotiating process after it signed a bilateral agreement with the
United States had materialized.

A presidential administration official previously said that the
country could complete talks on joining the body governing global
trade as early as at the end of March 2006.

Ukraine has signed protocols with the majority of WTO members,
including with the United States on March 2, on mutual access to
commodities and services markets. In mid-February, the U.S. granted
it market economy status after the European Union declared Ukraine
a market economy at the end of 2005.

Energy Security Problems of Armenia Debated

Energy Security Problems of Armenia Debated

National Assembly of RA, Armenia
March 17 2006

On March 16 at NA parliamentary hearings were held on the theme “RA
Energy Security” by NA Standing Committee on Defence, National Security
and Internal Affairs. Members of parliament, MPs, those responsible
for respective departments and representatives of international and
public organizations attended the hearings.

Mher Shahgeldyan, Chairman of NA Standing Committee on Defence,
National Security and Internal Affairs, mentioned that the energy
development, as well as ensuring regular vital activity, are the main
problems of RA national security. According to him, today energy
security and development of the sphere are problems directed to
Armenia’s future, taking into account the regional developments, RA
geographical location, as well as the expansion of high technologies
and the imperative need for the future development of our country. He
believes that the public is greatly interested in the problem, and
politicians and statesmen, representatives of public organizations
and our citizens are eager to see the existing vision clearly and
distinctly. It was also mentioned that the problem has to do with
every citizen’s daily life. The public interest becomes pressing and
acute on account of recent fluctuations in gas price, as well as the
problems of state control on nuclear energy debated at the National
Assembly. Mr. Shahgeldyan spoke on the regular activity of energy
system, ways of energy carriers’ regular supply and prevision of
energy carriers’ sources. It was noted that they try to create and
form a concept on RA national security, which will become the most
important document on strategic planning for the coming years.

Artur Baghdasaryan, NA President, highlighted the organization of
hearings and mentioned that a unified concept on the national security
is currently developed, and RA energy security is its component
part. Energy security problems are of key political importance in the
globalized world and in the complicated and difficult region, and we
are to display a serious state approach towards these problems. He
believes that the hearings will promote the debate of the problems
accumulated in the system, at least, and perhaps to giving solutions
through suggestions and will promote the endorsement of the drafts,
which are currently in official circulation. The NA President spoke
on the necessity of developing a concept on RA national security,
mentioning that it should include both tactics and perspective
strategic approaches. He particularly said: “The increase in Russian
gas caused great concern not only among politicians but also in the
society and among factories, and we still expect that Russia as a
friendly country for Armenia should certainly try to find mutually
accepted solutions through negotiations, as the increase in gas price
in Armenia means serious social difficulties for the population, rise
in product and service prices, serious complications concerning economy
and our future developments. In this situation we should naturally
try to find ways out, and I hope that some solutions will certainly
be found, enabling the population to avoid the rise in prices. The
state in its turn should take appropriate steps to protect both the
population and managers. I bring this example not only on account
that it is closely connected with the problem currently debated but
because it is really of great importance for us to have a concept on
the national security, as we can’t avoid energy carriers’ rises in
a few years.

But this does not mean that the country and the society should appear
defenseless, on the contrary, we should try hard so as in future
we are secured against unfavourable developments of this or that
kind that can occur in the sphere of energy. That is why I believe
that the concept that can be developed and also submitted to the
society’s judgment is of great public and political significance
and will allow keeping the energy strategic problems of Armenia at
the center of foreseeable developments. I would like to consider the
government’s endorsement of RA energy development strategy after long
debates a positive step: this is a document of great importance on
RA energy development vision and imperatives, but I think that at
least from the national security viewpoint we should pay much more
serious attention to the energy security. Today, it is difficult to
underestimate the economic significance of the Iran-Armenia pipeline
but we should understand that we should have scenarios for at least
a few developments on the energy sphere. And here the transparency
and publicity of the government’s policy in the energy sphere are
very important.” Touching upon the problems on the privatization of
the nuclear energy, the NA President noted that the principles of
withdrawing from the state monopoly caused serious debates at the
National Assembly. According to him, it is necessary to seriously
debate and understand what the state intervention in the energy
sphere leads to, what kind of state intervention and state control
can be applied. These are problems that should be seriously debated
and solved in RA energy development strategy, in the concept on the
energy security.

Armen Movsisyan, Energy Minister, spoke on the theme “RA Energy
Security and Development Strategy.” He mentioned that the principles
of state policy in the sphere of energy set out in the law on Energy
aim at promoting RA sustainable economic development, at providing
security in the sphere of energy, stimulating the energy independence
of the republic and so on. The minister informed that hydroelectric
power stations smaller than 38 are built in the republic, that it
is envisaged to raise them to 260mw, which will annually provide
500 million kw/h energy. He highlighted the construction of the
Iran-Armenia pipeline, which will enable Armenia to annually import
2bn 800m cubic metre gas under the present circumstances, when
Armenia’s home demand is equivalent to 1bn 700 m cubic metre gas. In
order to create a minimum cost from the maximum with the country’s
production power, a rise in the share of Metsamor’s nuclear power
plant is necessary. It was informed that in 2005 the nuclear power
plant had a record rate of product: it produced 2bn 700m kw/h energy.

The Energy Minister touched upon the problem of making use of thermal
power plants’ potentials and mentioned that the stations need to be
reconstructed. Reminding that Metsamor’s exploitation power ends
in 2016, Armen Movsisyan highlighted the substitute of the former
nuclear power plant for a new one, meeting modern requirements.

Touching upon the rise in gas prices, he mentioned that it creates
serious consequences for the population and economy, but we should
realize that there is no 54 dollar price for gas in the world.

During the hearings MPs, the representatives of international and
public organizations, interested people expressed their viewpoints.

Samvel Balasanyan, Head of the Country of Law faction, believes that
the energy sphere is of strategic significance for our country and
is connected with the country’s security and economic development.

Alexander Iskandaryan, Head of the Caucasus Media Institute,
touched upon the problems on regional and local energy security,
Astghine Pasoyan, Program Manager, Alliance to Save Energy, Armenia,
spoke on the energy saving potential of Armenia’s economy and the
developments of national policy, professor Zohrab Melikyan, Chief
of the Department of Heat-Gas Supply and Ventilation in the Yerevan
State University of Architecture and Construction, presented the ways
of the development of Armenia’s gas supply system, Levon Eghiazaryan,
docent, General Director of the Energy Research Institute, touched
upon the problems of energy supply.

ANKARA: Armenia Isolated from Regional Projects

Armenia Isolated from Regional Projects

Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
March 17 2006

Today Armenia is isolated from regional projects and kept outside of
important communications. “We have done that because Armenia will not
give up its aggressive policy,” Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said
in his speech at the Second World Congress of Azerbaijanis in Baku.

He added that Azerbaijan will not make concessions, but will struggle
for a settlement of the Karabakh conflict that maintains the republic’s
territorial integrity. “Any cooperation is out of question until
Armenia liberates our territories,” said Aliyev.

Owing to rapid economic growth, Azerbaijan is developing, while the
economy of Armenia, which is in isolation, makes no headway.

The interest and importance of Azerbaijan’s partners and neighbors is
constantly growing. All this makes us believe that the country will
resolve all its problems, including the Karabakh conflict, said Aliyev.

He urged all Azerbaijanis living in various countries around the
world to actively promote the prosperity of their motherland and the
resolution of its problems.

Armenian DM criticized for statements regarding Karabakh settlement

Armenian Defense Minister criticized for statements regarding Karabakh settlement

Regnum, Russia
March 17 2006

Armenian volunteers, who participated in Karabakh war called
“treacherous and immoral” statements of Armenian National Security
Secretary and Defense Minister Serzh Sarkisyan. He said that
“during the war, Armenia destroyed the enemy, and not liberated the
territories,” and used the term “security zone” instead of “liberated
territories.” Position of Armenian veterans was announce on March
16, during a round table conference in Yerevan, informed Assistant
coordinator of the public initiative “In defense of liberated
technologies” Armen Yegyan.

He said that Sarkisyan’s statements made at a meeting with army command
“demoralize officers, and presume return of liberated territories to
Azerbaijan.” According to ex-commander of Special Forces battalion
Girar Sefilyan “Sarkisyan must be dismissed by political means, using
opposition forces,” because “with such government, Armenia will not
be capable to conduct warfare,” thinks Sefilyan.

According to ex-Prime Minister MP Vazgen Manukyan, Sarkisyan “had no
authority to make such statements”. He said that the statements are
“directed to the West, and aims only to preserve power”, and noted,
that “return of liberated territories is impossible, because it can
happen only after the recognition of Nagorno Karabakh independence,
that is unacceptable to Azerbaijan”. He said that warfare can
recommence only if Azerbaijan feels stronger, and Armenia – weaker,
but in next 3-4 years it will not take place. “Armenian authorities
simply threaten the people with possibility of warfare recommence,
to prevent it we must compromise”, said Manukyan.

According to ex-Minister of Defense Vagarshak Arutyunyan, “if the
return of occupied territories is Armenian concession, than Azerbaijan
must return Artsvashen to Armenia and several occupied regions
to Nagorno Karabakh, and because of this, the question was never
raised at the negotiations on Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement,”
said Arutyunyan.

British journalist Thomas de Waal:”Armenians and Azeris doomed to be

British journalist Thomas de Waal: “Armenians and Azeris doomed to be neighbors”

Today, Azerbaijan
March 17 2006

17 March 2006 [16:12] – Today.Az

“Permanent political instability in Azerbaijan was an important factor
in the Karabakh war,” said author of “Black Garden” book dedicated
to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict Thomas de Waal.

In his words, during the critical battles for Shusha and Lachin
the Azeri troops left for Baku to meddle in the internal political
disorders. “The greatest territorial surrenders were Aghdam and Fizuli
and they occurred in 1994,” de Waal noted.

At the same time he noted that anyone knows that the geographical map
cannot be changed. “Armenians and Azeris will always have to live
as neighbors and it’s painful to see that the two societies abide
by the slogan “Karabakh is ours and it’s inseparable”. Neither of
the parties is ready for compromise that is why it’s hard to achieve
complete peace,” the journalist said.

Thomas de Waal says the leadership of Armenia and Azerbaijan is
responsible for it. “The peaceful plan is generally outlined.

Karabakh will de-facto maintain the present status with the corridor
to Armenia; Azerbaijan will receive its lands back and refugees will
be allowed to return… However the settlement process cannot be
started without dialogue and mutual trust,” he underscored.

“I think Armenia doesn’t fully understand the pain that Azeris suffer
over the loss of the territories. I am not speaking about Karabakh. I
am speaking about the big territories and towns which are completely
ruined and empty now – Aghdam, Fizuli, Jabrail, Kubatly… But it’s
known that any peaceful agreement will provide for the return of these
territories. Armenians should openly speak of it to make Azerbaijani
radicals think what they want to fight for. As a matter of fact, 90%
of the issues are settled and the negotiation process stumbles over
the Karabakh status only,” he said.

/PanARMENIAN.Net/

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/24252.html

TBILISI: Project Of Renewal Of Railway Communication Between Armenia &am

Project Of Renewal Of Railway Communication Between Armenia and Russia Estimated

Prime News Agency, Georgia
March 17 2006

Tbilisi, March 17 (prime-News) – The project of renewal of railway
communication between Armenia and Russia through the territory of the
unrecognized republic Abkhazia is being estimated, Nikolai Pavlov,
Russian Ambassador Plenipotentiary and Extraordinary to Armenia,
stated on Friday.

According to him, shares of participating countries are being
calculated as well.

Leaders of JSC Russian Railway, JSC Armenian Railway and Georgian
Railway Ltd. made a decision on development of the business project
on organization of Sochi-Tbilisi through railway communication via
territory the unrecognized republic Abkhazia on January 20, 2006.

It was decided to establish an international consortium with
participation of the three institutions and Abkhazian railway men.

It is planned that Azerbaijani State Railway will take part in the
consortium.

Gazprom has not still fixed final gas price for Armenia

Gazprom has not still fixed final gas price for Armenia, but chain reaction has already began

Regnum, Russia
March 17 2006

On March 16, Hrazdan thermoelectric power plant (Armenia) addressed
to the Armenian Commission on Public Services Regulation, requesting
to recalculate tariff for produced energy. As a REGNUM correspondent
informs, in accordance with gas tariffs increasing, the electric
station suggested fixing price for domestic consumer of 21.36 drams
($4.7 cents) per kilowatt-hour instead of former 11.37 drams. The
tariff offered by Hrazdan electric station, increases by 90%, comparing
with he current one.

It should be reminded, that on April 10, average gas price for
domestic consumer totals $162.95 per 1000 cubic meters. For users,
consuming less then 10,000 cubic meters per month (for population),
tariff totals 90 drams ($20 cents) per cubic meter; for users,
consuming more then 10,000 cubic meters ~W $146.51. For population
gas tariff will rise by about 52.5%, for enterprises ~V by 85.2%.

Recalculation of gas tariffs for domestic consumer is caused by fact
that from April 1 price of gas, supplied from Russia, will nearly
duplicate ~V from $56 up to $110 per 1000 cubic meters. However,
the Russian holding granted Armenia a delay till April 1, and talks
between Yerevan and Moscow on the question still continue.

It should be reminded, that recently spokeswoman to Electroseti
Armenii JSC Margarita Grigoryan stated if Armenian Commission on Public
Services Regulation decided to increase tariffs for produced energy,
probably Electroseti Armenii JSC would address to the Commission
requesting to change tariffs for domestic consumer.

Part of gas expenditures totals 85% in energy prime cost, produced by
Hrazdan thermoelectric power station. It should be mentioned, that
Hrazdan TPS infrastructure was handed over to Russia, in accordance
with On Armenia~Rs Acquittance to Russia agreement between governments
of Armenia and Russia. Within of the framework of the scheme, the
whole stock of Hrazdan TPS was received by Russian side for $31
million. Also, Hrazdan TPS is the only one energy supplier from
Armenia to Georgia.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: It is time to rouse & strengthen Azeri-Turkish lobby – AkkanSu

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
March 17 2006

It is time to rouse & strengthen Azeri-Turkish lobby – Akkan Suver

Source: Trend
Author: J.Shahverdiyev

17.03.2006

It is time to rouse and strengthen Azerbaijani-Turkish lobby, Trend
reports quoting Akkan Suver, the head of the Marmara Strategic and
Social Studies Group, as saying to journalists on Friday.

He noted that complaints voiced so far concerned lack of joint
Azerbaijani-Turkish lobby. Nevertheless, organization of the
2nd congress of world Azerbaijanis demonstrate the issue is under
solution. “Azerbaijan recommended us to set to the issue.

Strengthening of the lobby is necessary not only for Azerbaijan and
Turkey, but also the all Turkic world,” Suver stressed.

He also stressed that there was an item on the activities of
Azerbaijani-Turkish Diaspora among documents, adopted during the 2nd
congress. “Many countries assailed Turkey after recognizing of the
invented genocide of Armenians. We have to act jointly due to the
single problem. It is necessary to carry out joint struggle with the
forces hostile to the all Turkic world,” Suver stressed.

ANKARA: Fried: Armenian Genocide Allegations is a Complicated Issue

Fried: Armenian Genocide Allegations is a Complicated Issue

Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
March 17 2006

Daniel Fried, the US Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian
Affairs, said the Armenian genocide allegations is a “complicated
issue” and must be examined by the parties in a courageous way.

Fried together with Upper Karabag (Karabagh) problem negotiator Steven
Mann met Turkish Foreign Ministry officials yesterday.

Speaking after the talks Fried said, “Tragedies of the past must be
handled with courage and nations must look at their futures.”

The US diplomat underlined he has no message about the Turkey-Armenia
relations, indicating the US’s attitude towards the issue is
well-known, and President George W. Bush will probably make a relevant
statement on the issue this April as he does every year.

The American official added the issue of Washington’s demand of
opening the Turkish-Armenian border also came to the agenda during
the contacts.