SME’s Developing in Armenia Despite of Unfavorable Conditions

Panorama.am

15:10 02/06/06

SMALL AND MID SIZE BUSINESS DEVELOPING IN ARMENIA DESPITE OF
UNFAVORABLE CONDITIONS

National Center on Development of Small and Mid Size Business in
Armenia opened a new office today in Yerevan. In the words of the
executive director of the center Ishkhan Karapetyan more than 12 000
entrepreneurs received assistance from the organization from 2003 to
2005. The state subsidized 820 mln Armenian drams for that
purpose. According to I. Karapetyan small and mid size business has a
tendency to develop in Armenia with a reported 40% rate.

Despite of the fact that the center is supported by UNDP, OSCE, German
Society on Technical Cooperation (GTZ) and several others, the deputy
representative of UNDP in Armenia Alexander Avanesov thinks this is `a
government project.’ The projects will be evaluated by OSCE. `We were
so excited by incubator enterprises in Goris that we decided to fund
it,’ OSCE representative Frank Frant said. He urged donors to fund the
project requiring Euro 3000.

According to A. Avanesov, the main problems for small and mid size
businesses are their start and probability of survival. `We focus on
education but then the most important part comes – the funding. Bank
rates are high, softly speaking. On the other hand, the ministry of
trade thrice increases the guarantees for providing resources for
small and mid size businesses. Under such conditions, the banks may
lower credit conditions,’ Avanesov says.

National Center on Development of Small and Mid Size Business in
Armenia established by the decision of government in 2002. It is
called to connect small and mid size business entities with the
government structures. The Fund has representations in all the regions
of Armenia and provides financial, consulting and educational support
to business community. /Panorama.am/

Be Careful with Human Being

Panorama.am

17:19 02/06/06

BE CAREFUL WITH HUMAN BEING

Haik BABUKHANYAN addressed statements in Iravunk daily to chief
prosecutor on the threats offered by Alexander Sargsyan, NA deputy to
T. Tovmasyan, reporter of the same newspaper. The statements, however,
were not reacted in any way.

Criticizing violence against reporters in Hayeli club today,
Babukhanayn said that Sashik Sargsyan regrets on his behavior. `He
must make a public apology to our reporter,’ Babukhanyan says. He also
thinks that violence against reporters will continue in Armenia unless
crimes are punished.

Karapet RUBINYAN, who came for the debate with Babukhanyan in Hayeli
club, also condemned violence against reporter. However, he also
warned reporters not to write libel against honest people. `Be careful
with human being,’ he said. /Panorama.am/

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

No Alternative

Panorama.am

17:21 02/06/06

NO ALTERNATIVE

NA deputies today elected two chairs of permanent committees on
Social, Health and Nature Protection as well as Defense, Internal
Affairs and National Security. Both were taken by United Working Party
(MAK) members Mnatsakan Petrosyan and Aramais Grigoryan. Mnatsakan
Petrosyan received 71 votes with 1- against and Aramais Grigoryan
received 70 votes with 1 against.

Before their candidacies were proposed, Mnatsakan Petrosyan and
Aramais Grigoryan left their powers as members of returning board.
Hripsime Avetisyan took the position in the returning board from MAK
and Samvel Sahakyan replaced independent deputy A. Grigoryan in the
same board. Vostanik Marukhyan from the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation was not proposed for any position but he was replaced by
Gegham Manukyan from the same party.

The newly elected heads of the committees will govern only for one
year because next year new parliamentary elections will take
place. A. Grigoryan assured that he has a clear idea how he is going
to manage the committee and promised to work in the same spirit as
Mher Shahgeldyan did. Shahgeldyan’s candidacy was proposed by Hmaiak
Hovhannisyan but the latter refused to compete for the position.
Hmaiak Hovhannisyan’s candidacy was proposed by Viktor Dallakyan but
again the deputy refused to participate in the
elections. /Panorama.am/

Wishing on a star

San Francisco Chronicle, CA
June 3 2006

WISHING ON A STAR
Channing brings melody, memories to severely ill Burlingame fan
Mike Weiss, Chronicle Staff Writer

Saturday, June 3, 2006

After decades as a Broadway star, Carol Channing has transformed
herself into something of an old-fashioned doctor, the kind who makes
house calls. She does it because she believes that performance — not
least her own — has healing effects.

The star of “How to Marry a Millionaire” and “Hello, Dolly” and
recipient of three honorary doctorates dropped in Friday at the
Burlingame home of Gordon Cline, who is dying from chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease.

Cline, 77, who needs a constant supply of oxygen, and Channing, 85,
who was raised in San Francisco, traveled the world and now lives in
Modesto, immediately were on a first-name basis.

Channing was barely in the door of Gordon and Billi Cline’s yellow
frame cottage — wearing her signature oversize black-rimmed glasses
and a shiny fire-engine-red jacket — when she broke into her theme
song, adapted to the circumstances:

“Hell-o, Gordon, Hell-o, Gordon

“So nice to have you here where you belong

“You’re looking swell, Gordon … and you are.”

Beaming, Cline, who had shaved for the occasion — there are days
when he is too short of breath to make the effort — exclaimed: “I
didn’t even have to ask!”

Soon, to the delight of their adoring spouses — Harry Kullijian,
Channing’s junior high sweetheart, whom she married recently, and
Billi Cline, whom Cline met at a concert in 1995 after the deaths of
their spouses — the entertainer and the retired chemist were in a
full flirt.

“What’s that for?” Channing asked, pointing at the tank that feeds
Cline oxygen through a nasal tube.

“That’s my lifeblood,” he answered.

“I used to take oxygen between my afternoon and evening shows,”
Channing said.

And the mention of her shows reminded Cline what he wanted to see: “I
want to see you do Marlene Dietrich.”

The spirited get-together was arranged by Pathways, a nonprofit, San
Jose-based hospice that, since Cline’s hospitalization, has provided
the Clines with home nursing visits, spiritual counseling and a level
of caring that Gordon calls “a godsend.”

Channing began to work with organizations like Pathways while
recuperating from ovarian cancer when she discovered that performing
did her more good than resting.

“You reach to the heavens to get the show out,” she said in her
famously scratchy, baby-talk voice, “and the heavens somehow answer
us. It heals my fellow actors, heals the audience, and it heals me.”

Cline has needed oxygen for four years. But his health took a turn
for the worse in January, when he went out in a driving rain to sand
a sticky gate leading to Billi’s glory: a landscaped backyard, the
crowning achievement of which is a two-tier pool stocked with carp.

He was in an intensive-care unit for two weeks. Twice, Billi went to
the hospital thinking her husband was about to expire.

“He was so ill, it’s almost like I’ve gone through his death already.
And I don’t mean that tritely,” said Billi, a trim woman with a
down-home style who shares a love of travel with Gordon. Four times
they have hauled his oxygen to remote regions of Alaska that can be
reached only by bush plane.

In their own ways, and with help from Pathways, the Clines have come
to terms with the inevitable. Her husband may have months left, Billi
said, or he may have hours. Nonetheless, asked to sum up his life,
Gordon said one word: “Happy.”

Cline has left his funeral arrangements entirely in Billi’s hands.
When Billi picked out their burial plots, she said, the man from the
cemetery told her they were so full they had instituted a new system,
double dips. She found that funny and shared a laugh with Gordon
until she figured out the man had said double depths. And then they
had an even better laugh.

Billi sometimes cries when talking about what is coming. And she says
angrily about her husband’s lifelong smoking habit: “I have to admit
that sometimes I wish some of the CEOs of tobacco companies could be
hooked up to a respirator.”

After a while, the couples settled in the Clines’ sunroom overlooking
the pond. Channing and Gordon held hands. Her fingers are twisted
with arthritis, his discolored because the steroids he needs for his
illness also make him bruise easily.

Channing said her late father still comes to her when she needs him
most. “I know,” she said, making a dismissive backhand gesture, “this
is not the end of us. It is not.”

“We’ve been kind of wondering,” Gordon Cline said, “what’s going to
happen with our previous spouses?”

“Maybe we’ll swap, huh?” his wife said, mischievously.

Soon Cline needed a rest — his breath was coming in gasps — and
while he regathered himself, the honorary doctor who made 5,000
appearances in “Hello, Dolly” talked about why she likes to make
house calls.

“I want it on my tombstone: ‘She Lifted Lives,’ Channing said. “And
what about Gordon? He’s an inspiration. He knows he’s going soon, and
it doesn’t frighten him. He has every will to live. And he is so in
love with his wife.”

It is almost time to leave when the name of Marlene Dietrich, the
Hollywood star with the head-turning legs, came up again. Cline still
wanted to see the impersonation, so Channing lifted the leg of her
black slacks and showed a bit of ankle.

“Armenians are funny about their wives,” Channing said about her
watchful husband. “They won’t let them take their pants off for
friends.” Big laugh all around.

The goodbye took awhile, what with autographing photos and CDs, but
in the end, the 85-year old diva blew the dying man a kiss.

“You and I, Gordon, will be together again,” she said, and left.

BAKU: Armenians think anything signed in Bucharest will meet Azeri..

Today, Azerbaijan
June 3 2006

Armenian MP thinks any document to be signed in Bucharest will meet
Azeri interests

03 June 2006 [15:00] – Today.Az

“Any document to be signed between Azerbaijan and Armenia presidents
in Bucharest on Nagorno Garabagh conflict regulation will be in favor
of official Baku,” stated Armenia Democratic Party’s chairman, MP
Aram Sarkisian.

According to his words, since exact agreement formula was not found
between the sides, signing of any document is inadmissible in the
present situation.

“Ilham Aliyev has stated for several times that Nagorno Karabakh will
remain within composition of Azerbaijan, with these terms Armenia
will lose if signs an agreement. OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs propose
stationing of peacekeepers in the region, but it is not within the
concern of Armenia.”

It should be noted that, the next meeting between Azerbaijan and
Armenia presidents will be held in Romania tomorrow.

Before the meeting foreign ministers of countries, OSCE Minsk Group
chairman, Foreign minister of Belgium Karel de Gucht, OSCE Minsk
Group co-chairs and OSCE chairman in-office Andrzey Kasprzyk will
agree the issues once again which will be discussed in the meeting,
APA informs.

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/26885.html

BAKU: Justice minister of Azerbaijan visited Strasbourg

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
June 3 2006

JUSTICE MINISTER OF AZERBAIJAN VISITED STRASBOURG
[June 03, 2006, 12:48:24]

Minister of Justice of Azerbaijan Fikret Mammadov has been visiting
Strasbourg on May 3- June 2, to participate at the 13th general
sitting of the Council of Europe Local and Regional Authorities
(CELRA) Congress.

In the frame of visit, Mr. Mammadov met with the newly elected
chairman of the CELRA, the Norwegian deputy H. Scard and ex-chairman
C. Di Stai.

Discussed were issues linked to improvement of the election
legislation in the country, the works done related to the last
parliamentary re-elections and reforms in the penitentiary
establishments.

In the meetings with Secretary General of the Council of Europe Terry
Davis and human rights commissioner T. Hammerberg, focused were
issues of cooperation and priorities in this direction.

Minister of Justice also updated on the negations concerning
settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, the Armenian aggression
and its sequences, noting that the rights of over one million of
Azerbaijanis were violated.

Head of the Permanent Representation of Azerbaijan at the Council of
Europe Agshin Mehdiyev took part in the meetings.

LA: Senate honors local restaurateur

Los Angeles Daily News, CA
June 3 2006

Senate honors local restaurateur
BY ALEX DOBUZINSKIS, Staff Writer

Rita Iskenderian was born in Syria, married in Beirut during a civil
war and started running a restaurant business as a widow. But she had
never visited the capital of her adopted state – until this week.
On Tuesday, Iskenderian flew to Sacramento to be honored for the
success of her six Zankou Chicken restaurants, including locations in
Glendale, Van Nuys and Burbank. State Sen. Jack Scott, D-Pasadena,
chose Zankou for the 2006 Small Business Award for his 21st Senate
District.

Over the years, Iskenderian, 50, has dealt with tragedy. But being
applauded on the Senate floor was almost enough to get her talking
like a teenager.

“I was stunned. They took me there and they stopped the meeting and
all the senators clapped,” she said a day after the experience. “Can
you believe that? I was going to die.”

Scott’s office said it chose Zankou because it was looking for a
small business that had left its mark on the district.

“With six restaurants in Southern California – three of which are in
the district – Zankou Chicken has been a leader in the local business
community,” Scott said in a prepared statement. “Hers is an immigrant
story of hard work and perseverance.”

Iskenderian, who spends much of her time driving between the various
Zankou locations handling day-to-day operations, took over the
business after the violent 2003 death of her husband, Mardiros
Iskenderian.

He shot his mother and sister before taking his own life in an
apparent dispute police say could have been aggravated by
judgment-clouding cancer medication.

Now, Rita Iskenderian, along with her four sons, runs six Zankou
locations. A seventh in Hollywood, where the business started in
1984, belongs to her sister-in-law.

Speaking in Zankou’s 3-month-old Burbank location, Iskenderian said
she knows about adversity.

“Life itself is a challenge; every day is a challenge,” she said.
“But you have to be strong to conquer everything.”

On April 24, 2005, a vandal splashed red paint on Zankou’s Glendale
location because the Armenian-American business happened to be open
the day Armenians commemorate the 1915 genocide.

That location was also robbed by the same man twice within a year –
once in September 2004 and again the following July. The suspect has
not been caught, Iskenderian said.

But even as she has faced challenges, Iskenderian has been
reinventing Zankou, named after a river in Armenia.

The Burbank spot, with its stone and tile work and painted interior
dome, is more in line with the way she wants any future restaurants
she opens to look – upscale instead of just functional.

Iskenderian’s son, Dikran, talks about opening a Zankou in New York
City.

She goes further, dreaming of having a Zankou in every big American
city.

But she also knows her limitations after having opened two locations
recently.

“I need to a little bit rest,” she said, “after those two stores in
one year.”

Boxing: Darchinyan finds spotlight

Los Angeles Daily News, CA
June 3 2006

Boxing: Darchinyan finds spotlight
BY ROBERT MORALES, Staff Writer

If you got it, flaunt it. That’s Vic Darchinyan’s motto. He hits
hard, and every time he fights he is hopeful of putting that power on
display.
Darchinyan, of Australia via Armenia, will defend his International
Boxing Federation flyweight title against Luis Maldonado of Mexico in
what is now tonight’s main event at Thomas & Mack Center in Las
Vegas.

Although everyone expected the fireworks of the night to come in the
fight between Jose Luis Castillo and Diego Corrales, it won’t be
surprising to see Darchinyan put on his own show.

Corrales-Castillo was canceled Friday when Castillo did not make the
135-pound weight limit.

“If you can show your power, people really love you,” said
Darchinyan, who is trained by Hall of Famer Jeff Fenech, a former
bantamweight and featherweight champion out of Sydney, Australia.

Darchinyan is 25-0 with 20 knockouts. His first four victories
produced just one knockout, but he has knocked out 19 out of his past
21 opponents. Some of this power, Darchinyan said, is God-given.

The rest comes from a love for boxing that motivates him to train the
way a champion should train. The thinking is, God-given ability is
one thing, but if a fighter’s work ethic is poor, he will not be able
to be all that he can be.

“I just love my training,” Darchinyan said. “I love to show people my
power. But I am not very old and I feel like I am becoming much more
powerful and my punch is coming harder.”

Since Darchinyan is a small fighter, and he’s not American, he is not
well-known here. But his fight will be televised by Showtime. Don’t
think he won’t take advantage of the exposure – with a bang, perhaps.

“It is a very good opportunity for me,” Darchinyan said. “I have won
a lot of my fights by knockout since winning the title. It is very
important for me to win by knockout. … I feel I am the strongest
puncher in my division, and the most powerful puncher pound-for-pound
in boxing. If anyone hits harder than me, I’d like to know his name.
As always, I look forward to showing the world my power, and my
style.”

Darchinyan has made three title defenses, each of which he has won by
knockout.

Maldonado, ranked No. 8 by the IBF, is no slouch at 33-0-1 with 25
knockouts.

“He is a good, strong fighter,” Darchinyan said.

So is Darchinyan.

– Robert Morales

BAKU: President of Heydar Aliyev Fund met with chairman of IAC

TREND, Azerbaijan
June 3 2006

President of Heydar Aliyev Fund met with chairman of IAC

Source: Trend
Author: R.Abdullayev

03.06.2006

The president of the Heydar Aliyev Fund and the good-will ambassador
of UNESCO Mehriban Aliyeva met with the chairman of the Interstate
Aircraft Committee (IAC) Tatiana Anodin on June 2, Trend reports.

The guest got familiar with the activity of the Heydar Aliyev Fund
and then, put down a note in the memory book of the fund.

Aliyeva provided detailed information about the activity of the Fund,
the projects carried out for keeping the cultural heritage of Azeri
people, propaganda of the national values and etc.

At the same time, Anodin highly assessed the activity of the Heydar
Aliyev Fund. At the end of the meeting, the guest was issued
presents, as well as books and booklets reflecting the realities
about Azerbaijan-Armenian Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Russian Russia, not Soviet Russia

The Times, UK
June 3 2006

Russian Russia, not Soviet Russia
review by Simon Sebag Montefiore

RULERS AND VICTIMS: The Russians in the Soviet Union
by Geoffrey Hosking
Belknap Press, £22.95; 436pp

RUSSIA, WHETHER under Putin, Stalin or Peter the Great, has always
been almost impossible to fit into the usual categories of nationhood
and empire. The USSR was often called `Soviet Russia’ and in many
ways became a Russian Empire with the Russians the `older brother’ of
its peoples – yet Russians were often its chief victims.

By the time of Soviet senescence, it was the Russians who took
greatest pride in its creaky glories. But on its downfall in 1991, it
was the Russians, under President Yeltsin of the Russian Federation,
who destroyed President Gorbachev’s USSR, the source of their
greatest pride. As Geoffrey Hosking tells it: `the Russians destroyed
the Soviet Union not because they wished to, but because of the logic
of their republic ‘s position in the country’s institutional
structure’.

The Russians, Hosking believes, are, apart from the Jews, the world’s
most messianic people. `Most European nations have gone through at
least one period in their history when they assumed their religion,
civilisation or political system was especially beneficial and ought
to be spread to the whole of humanity,’ he writes. But the ruling
nation was often `subordinated to the supranational idea’ – so Spain
was bankrupted by the Catholic mission of the Spanish Empire. Often
such empires are linked to a crown/class-system that weakens until
the whole edifice collapses.

In Russia’s case, the Tsar-Emperors propagated the Orthodox mission
of Muscovite Third Rome. Hosking compares its mission to the
Caliphate of the Ottoman Padishahs. In both, by the 20th century,
monarchy was an empty husk, shorn of sanctity. Both fell almost
simultaneously, but while the Turks lost their empire the Russians
regained theirs, even increased it.

There were two reasons for this – the Bolshevik state was capable of
extraordinary levels of military-economic mobilisation allowing it to
reconquer the empire. The second is that there are two strains of
messianic mission in Russian culture – the Orthodox and the
socialistic. When Tsardom fell, `the vacuum was filled by Russian
messianic socialism’.

At the heart of Lenin’s Bolshevik state was the pragmatic
multi-ethnic structure that he and Stalin had envisioned in Cracow in
1912-13: it cleverly promised autonomy with the right of secession to
the many nationalities in the `prison of nations’ but it was a right
that would never need to be exercised. On seizing power in 1917, they
had no choice but to release Poland and the Baltic States, and they
let Finland go .

But when they had the chance in 1921 they reconquered Georgia,
Armenia and Azerbaijan, then the Baltics in 1940 and, ultimately,
Eastern Europe, with Poland, in 1945.

When Lenin and his People’s Commissar of Nationalities constructed
the USSR, Russia received no central committee of its own while
Ukrainians, Belarussians and Kazakhs, among others, were promoted,
given the trappings of statehood and encouraged to teach their
languages. Until the 1930s, the USSR was prejudiced against Russians.
Lenin loathed what he called `great Russian chauvinism’ .

The Jewish part in the Soviet nightmare has to be faced, but I think
that it can be exaggerated. Hosking argues that the original Soviet
project was a Russian-Jewish creation and certainly in August 1917
six of the 21 central committee members and in 1936 six of the 20
people’s commissars were Jewish. Yes, Trotsky, Zinoviev and Sverdlov
were Jewish but I think a case can be made for the Caucasian
influence on the Revolution: the Georgians and Armenians had a hugely
disproportionate influence on the Bolshevik state. The Caucasian
culture of clans, loyalty and violence made them more effective and
influential than the Jews – although this has hardly been studied.

During the 1930s, Stalin started to change the nature of the Soviet
Union. Historians used to claim that the Georgian suddenly became
Russian and adopted Russian nationalism but Hosking is much too
sophisticated to repeat this cliché. Stalin did cull the Jews and
internationalists in the leadership, but men such as Kaganovich and
Mekhlis remained in high positions.

Stalin started to promote pride in Russian history but he thought
hard and created Soviet nationalism, the idea that a Soviet person
may or may not be Russian but co-opted both messianic socialism and
Russian nationalism/imperialism.

The Second World War changed this again: Stalin saw it as a Russian
victory so he tweaked his Soviet patriotic idea to promote the
Russians as `first among equals’.

The strange complexity of Soviet Russianness is best glimpsed by
looking at Stalin himself: the dictator existed as a man of at least
four `nationalities’ – he never ceased seeing himself as a Georgian,
he spoke it, ate it, holidayed there, read its literature; secondly,
he was a fanatical Marxist internationalist; thirdly he was a
Russian, indeed a tsar – the successor to Ivan the Terrible and Peter
the Great – and above all, he was the Soviet father of peoples, a
Soviet patriot.

No one understood the dangerous fragility of this complex structure
better than him, in the 1949 Leningrad Case, Stalin learnt that two
of his top grandees, Voznescensky and Kuznetzov, both Leningraders
and Russians, were promoting a Russian capital in Leningrad (leaving
the Soviet one in Moscow), with the creation of a separate Russian
Communist Party. Stalin knew this would destroy his own power as a
non-Russian and would tear asunder the USSR.

He reacted by brutally killing these close associates. He foresaw
exactly what happened in 1991 when the Russian Federation destroyed
the USSR.

After Stalin, the USSR was sustained by its obsessive pride in
Glorious October 1917 and Victorious 1945, which restored Russian
national morale, its international Communist role and its real
mission – rivalry with America. By the 1960s, the USSR was `in a real
sense Russian’ but in this backward-looking way.

Hosking’s analysis of the failure of the internal Soviet state is
peerless: `Though the Soviet state assumed and performed many
functions of a modern state, it did so without creating a political
community. Its conduits of power were largely directed from above
through personal channels. The trust of ordinary people was in
patron-client hierarchies’ – not laws or institutions.

Hosking has always been a deeply thoughtful historian. Here he
delivers a beautifully written, profound and brilliant analysis not
just of the USSR but of Russianness itself: anyone who wants to
understand Russia today or who wonders why the Russians are special
should read this outstanding, sensitive book.

He concludes: `Most Russians agree the disintegration of the USSR was
a disaster, not because they are inveterate Stalinists, but because
it was `their’ country. They are now building a nation state few of
them wished for. They have no choice though.’