Russia’s Rosselkhoznadzor restricts imports of dairy products from Armenia

Economy16:16, 24 July 2026
Read the article in: العربيةEspañolFarsiHayerenРусскийTürkçe中文

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) has imposed new restrictions on imports from Armenia, this time limiting imports of Armenian dairy products into Russia, according to a statement issued by the agency.

“From July 14 to 21, Rosselkhoznadzor specialists inspected Armenian dairy processing plants that had previously been approved on the basis of guarantees provided by the Armenian veterinary service and were supplying products to Russia. The inspections confirmed similar violations to those identified during inspections carried out in 2023–2024,” the statement said.

According to the agency, “the ongoing investigation established that milk from infected animals was being used to manufacture products supplied to Russia.”

“To date, Armenia has not established a system to verify the origin and safety of milk or other dairy raw materials used in production. In view of the violations identified, Rosselkhoznadzor has taken measures to prevent the import into Russia of particularly dangerous infectious diseases,” the statement added.

In recent months, Russia has restricted or completely banned imports of a number of Armenian products, citing various alleged violations as the reason for its decisions.

At the same time, Armenia has been working to diversify its export markets toward the European Union and other destinations. The European Union has stated that Russia is exerting economic pressure on Armenia and has expressed its readiness to support the country.

Read the article in: العربيةEspañolFarsiHayerenРусскийTürkçe中文

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

‘Areni-1 Cave: Prehistoric Life and Winemaking in the Arpa River Valley’ adde

Culture16:25, 24 July 2026
Read the article in: EspañolՀայերենRussian

The 48th session of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee is being held in Busan, the Republic of Korea, from July 19 to 29, with Armenia participating as a committee member for the first time.

Armenia’s delegation includes Harutyun Vanyan, head of the Department for the Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments at the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports, along with five national experts. The delegation is led by Aram Hakobyan, Armenia’s Permanent Representative to UNESCO.

According to the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports, Armenia’s nomination entitled “Areni-1 Cave: Prehistoric Life and Winemaking in the Arpa River Valley” has been approved for inclusion in the UNESCO World Heritage Tentative List.

The nomination was prepared under a memorandum of cooperation previously signed between the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports, the Areni-1 Cave Research Foundation, and the Armenian Enotourism Council NGO, with financial support provided by the Armenian Enotourism Council. The ministry described the initiative as another successful example of public-private partnership.

The newly listed nomination, along with all of Armenia’s previously registered nominations, is available on UNESCO’s official website.

With this addition, Armenia has expanded the number of its properties on the UNESCO World Heritage Tentative List from the four sites registered in 1995 to eight, following consistent efforts over the past three years.

Read the article in: EspañolՀայերենRussian

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 24/07/

Economy16:56, 24 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 24 July, USD exchange rate down by 0.08 drams to 365.87 drams. EUR exchange rate down by 0.86 drams to 416.43 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate up by 0.0228 drams to 4.6763 drams. GBP exchange rate down by 1.72 drams to 487.41 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price down by 1307 drams to 47580 drams. Silver price down by 8.15 drams to 690.02 drams.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Armenia’s Food Safety Inspectorate rejects Rosselkhoznadzor’s claims over dai

Russia17:00, 24 July 2026
Read the article in: Russian

Armenia’s Food Safety Inspectorate has rejected Rosselkhoznadzor’s claim that inspections carried out in Armenia found that dairy products exported to Russia were produced using milk from diseased animals.

On July 24, Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) announced restrictions on imports of dairy products from Armenia. The Russian agency said the decision was based on the alleged finding that inspections at several Armenian dairy producers had revealed the use of milk from diseased animals in the production of dairy products.

Responding to the statement, the Food Safety Inspectorate said it regularly carries out inspections at all dairy production facilities in Armenia under its annual inspection programme and on the basis of consumer complaints.

“If non-compliance is identified during inspections, the Inspectorate suspends the production activities of the relevant facility until the violations are remedied, while hazardous batches are withdrawn from circulation and destroyed.

Although the Russian side has not yet provided the results of the joint inspections conducted by specialists from Rosselkhoznadzor and the Food Safety Inspectorate at four Armenian dairy enterprises from July 14 to 21 this year, we can state that the inspections found no evidence that those facilities had used milk from diseased animals or raw materials imported from other countries.

According to the submitted documentation, the raw materials used in production had undergone laboratory testing and were confirmed to be safe.

The Inspectorate remains committed to ensuring that the entire food production chain complies with the requirements established by food safety legislation,” the statement said.

Read the article in: Russian

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Armenia and Paraguay discuss prospects for cooperation in education

Armenia19:45, 24 July 2026
Read the article in: ArabicՀայերենRussian

Armenian Ambassador to Uruguay Mariam Gevorgyan met with Hermenegildo Coene Velázquez, Deputy Minister of Education and Science of Paraguay, according to a statement issued by the Armenian Embassy in Uruguay.

The statement said the sides discussed prospects for developing bilateral cooperation in the field of education.

Ambassador Gevorgyan presented Armenia’s education system, highlighting the country’s achievements in the sector and the opportunities it offers.

Read the article in: ArabicՀայերենRussian

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Armenpress: Court revokes pretrial detention of Davit Ghazinyan

Law20:09, 24 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Armenia’s Anti-Corruption Court has revoked the pretrial detention of Strong Armenia party lawmaker Davit Ghazinyan. The court also granted the defence’s motion not to impose any alternative preventive measure, including bail. Ghazinyan was released from the courtroom.

Earlier, the public prosecutor had requested that Ghazinyan’s detention be replaced with 1 billion drams (about $2.6 million) in bail, a travel ban and administrative supervision through electronic monitoring.

The court also ruled that precedents set by the Administrative Court and the Constitutional Court apply in Ghazinyan’s case, meaning that parliamentary immunity is applicable to him.

On July 21, 2026, the prosecutor referred the criminal case against Ghazinyan, a parliamentary candidate from the Strong Armenia alliance, to the Anti-Corruption Court with an approved indictment.

According to the Anti-Corruption Committee, the investigation found that Ghazinyan, acting in prior agreement with A.M., who allegedly coordinated the work of the alliance’s campaign office in Yerevan, supporter A.S., and other individuals, had prepared to distribute bribes to voters in exchange for votes for the Strong Armenia alliance in the parliamentary elections held on June 7, 2026.

Investigators allege that, to carry out the plan, Ghazinyan handed 1.4 million drams to A.S. to be used for vote-buying. However, the alleged scheme was not completed due to disagreements among the participants over how the money would be distributed to voters, circumstances which investigators said were beyond Ghazinyan’s control. The money was later transferred to A.M.

Public criminal prosecutions have also been initiated against A.M., A.S., L.S., S.H., G.H., H.G. and P.J. on charges related to vote-buying, preparation to commit vote-buying and accepting election bribes.

The case materials, together with the approved indictment, were referred to the Anti-Corruption Court on July 21, 2026.

Earlier, Ghazinyan had been placed in pretrial detention for two months.

He was arrested on June 17 on charges of preparing to commit vote-buying. Before his arrest, Armenia’s Central Election Commission had granted the Prosecutor General’s Office’s motions seeking consent to initiate criminal proceedings against him and to deprive him of his liberty.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Verelq: The “Terrorism of the Century” hypothesis is collapsing

The evaluation of the independent experts of the UN, which cast doubt on the legal basis of the charges of terrorism brought against Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan and the members of the “Holy Struggle”, is a serious blow to the official version promoted by the government for a year.


Experts have expressed concern that the case may indicate abuse of anti-terror legislation and restriction of fundamental rights. They also drew attention to the fact that the investigation selectively released the tapes of the wiretapped conversations, while preventing the defense from releasing the parts it believed had exculpatory significance. This circumstance raises serious questions not only about the impartiality of the preliminary investigation, but also about the fairness of the entire trial.


It is not difficult to remember what kind of propaganda campaign the government organized just a year ago, presenting this case as the discovery of the “terror of the century”. At the beginning of the government session, Nikol Pashinyan publicly thanked the law enforcement agencies, and the “Civil Agreement” faction issued a condemning statement on behalf of the National Assembly regarding the “terrorist group”, even though the court had not yet started the investigation of the case. In fact, the political authority had already published its “sentence”.


Today, however, not only the validity of the accusation, but also the impartiality of the government and law enforcement agencies are questioned at the international expert level. In the context of the UN assessments, there is clearly a concern that the criminal prosecution could have been motivated by political motives and used to put pressure on the opposition.


It is symbolic that today another controversial decision was recorded in the same case. Judge Farkhoyan refused to change the house arrest imposed on NA MP Artur Sargsyan, ignoring the 2021 legal position of the Constitutional Court, according to which the status of a deputy implies his immediate release, if the National Assembly did not give the appropriate consent for the restriction of immunity.


However, the conclusion of the UN experts on this case has a much deeper significance. It reveals a systemic problem. if international experts question the factual and legal basis of one of the most noisy criminal cases of the government, then sooner or later the same questions will arise regarding other cases with political implications. There are reasons to believe that the cases initiated against many political figures who are in prison today will also not withstand the legal and international professional examination over time.


In authoritarian systems, justice stops serving the law and starts serving the government. Under these conditions, accusations are often made not on the basis of indisputable evidence, but on the basis of political expediency, and the courts and law enforcement agencies are turned into instruments serving the will of the government.


As a rule, time is the strongest examiner. The cases constructed by political order may serve the interests of the government for some time, but in the end, their factual and legal bankruptcy is revealed. This assessment by UN experts is another important evidence of that process.


Political scientist Suren Surenyants




—

2 wanted persons have been found in Dilij in the case of a sensational murder in Erebuni

The officers of the criminal police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Dilijan found and arrested 2 wanted persons accused of committing a crime in Muratsani street of the capital a few days ago.


On July 18, at 21:18, the 112 operational control center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs was alerted about the incident that took place on Muratsani Street in the capital. Operational teams of the Ministry of Internal Affairs police went to the scene where a body was found. Urgent operational-investigative measures were taken to find out all the circumstances of the incident.

—

The law created regarding the violation of Davit Ghazinyan’s immunity is unprecedented.

“Strong Armenia” party member Gohar Meloyan writes.


“In recent years, we have witnessed various violations of the Constitution and constitutionality.


However, in the context of the violation of the Constitution against political opponents, the situation regarding the violation of the immunity of the member of the National Assembly, Davit Ghazinyan, is unprecedented.


The law-enforcement system, realizing that the mandates will be provided to the deputies on July 21, sent his criminal proceedings to the court at breakneck speed in order to limit his freedom for a few more days.


Thus, having acquired the status of a deputy of the National Assembly since July 21, Davit Ghazinyan continues to be under arrest, being deprived of his freedom. This is an obvious and gross violation of Article 96 of the Constitution. As for Ghazinyan, who is under unjustified detention due to obvious political motivation, one of the most important rules of parliamentarism, the principle of parliamentary immunity, is violated.”

—

Two superpowers have not yet congratulated CP on the occasion of victory

“Zhoghovurd” daily writes:


“The Central Electoral Commission of the Republic of Armenia officially distributed the mandates of the National Assembly yesterday, which ended one of the most important stages of the electoral process. According to the official results, the “Prosperous Armenia” party did not overcome the threshold to enter the parliament, as a result of which around 60,000 votes cast in favor of the party were actually stolen.


Thus, the National Assembly of the 9th convocation is scheduled to convene its first session on August 2, and the parliament will begin work with a new political composition.


However, along with the political developments, the picture of the international reaction is also remarkable. According to the research of “Zhoghovurd” daily newspaper, according to official reports, the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin and the President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping did not send a public congratulatory message to Nikol Pashinyan on the occasion of his victory in the elections.


Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov announced after the elections that Moscow is waiting for the official final results, and only then will it be decided whether there will be congratulations or not. There are the official results, there is the decision of the Supreme Court, there is the final decision of the CEC, but the congratulation of the President of the Russian Federation is not.


Although such a circumstance cannot be interpreted as non-recognition of the elections, in any case, this is an important diplomatic gesture, especially considering the role of Russia and China in Armenia’s foreign policy agenda. Usually, congratulations of this level are considered not only as a ceremonial necessity, but also as a political impetus in the context of bilateral relations.

—