Armenian army chief to ‘remain in office’, lawyer says

Panorama, Armenia
March 3 2021

The chief of the Armenian army’s General Staff must remain in office since the process of dismissing him runs counter to the Constitution, according to Gohar Meloyan, an expert in constitutional law.

Armenian President Armen Sarkissian refused to sign a decree drafted by the prime minister to sack Onik Gasparyan for a second time on Tuesday. Also, he asked the Constitutional Court to determine the compliance of the 2017 law “On the Status of Military Service and Servicemen” with the Constitution. But the decree was said to automatically enter into force in three days’ time under the law.

In a Facebook post on Tuesday, the lawyer cited Article 155 (Part 3) of the Constitution, which says the highest military official of the armed forces is the General Staff chief, who is appointed by the president upon recommendation of the prime minister, for the term prescribed by law.

“Therefore, the powers to remove the chief of the General Staff from office are limited by the Constitution in order to preserve the inviolability of the armed forces in the event of a balance of political forces. (The grounds for dismissal are general: loss of citizenship, a final conviction, resignation, etc.).

“Article 139 of the Constitution defines the cases and procedures for the appointment and dismissal of the highest command staff of the Armed Forces and other troops but do not provide the authority to dismiss the General Staff chief. Hence, the Constitution gives a special status to the General Staff chief and does not authorize either the president or the prime minister of the country to dismiss him,” she said.

“As for Article 40.3 of the law “On the Status of Military Service and Servicemen”, which envisages the opportunity of discretionary dismissal of senior military officials, first of all, it does not apply to the General Staff chief, because, as I said, the Constitution does not provide for such an opportunity, and the Constitution is superior to the law, while the constitutional bodies are authorized to carry out only such actions which are envisaged by the Constitution. Second, the Constitution separates the chief of the General Staff from the highest command staff of the Armed Forces and other troops, noting that the General Staff chief is the most senior military official of the Armed Forces, giving him a special constitutional status.

“Therefore, the process of dismissing the General Staff chief is illegal in itself, and Onik Gasparyan will continue to hold office,” Meloyan said.  

Onik Gasparyan to stay General Staff chief until 8-day term expires – statement

Panorama, Armenia
March 3 2021

Colonel-General Onik Gasparyan will continue serving as the chief of the Armenian army’s General Staff until the expiration of an 8-day period, the General Staff said in a statement on Wednesday.

President Armen Sarkissian refused to sign a decree drafted by the prime minister to sack Onik Gasparyan for a second time on Tuesday. In a separate application, he asked the Constitutional Court to determine the compliance of the law of November 15, 2017 “On Military Service and Status of Military Servant” with the Constitution. But the decree was said to automatically enter into force in three days’ time under the law.

The statement shared by spokesman of the General Staff Samvel Asatryan said the president acted exclusively in line with the Constitution.

“Under Article 168 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Court is not entitled to determine the compliance of the draft presidential decree with the Constitution or resolve the issue of the dismissal of the General Staff chief; that is, the president may apply to the Constitutional Court with a request to determine the compliance of the law of November 15, 2017 “On Military Service and Status of Military Servant” with the Constitution exclusively as the legal basis of the draft decree, and not in connections with its specific article or part of the law.

“The deadline for applying to the Constitutional Court is not defined at all by Article 139 (Part 2) of the Constitution and the related part. The deadline for the relevant terms is set by Part 3 of Article 35.1 of the law – 8 days after the return of the draft decree (grounds for dismissal, Part 3 of Article 40 of the law refers to the procedure of appointment).

“According to the statement, the president acted and expressed his intention to act exclusively in line with the Constitution.

“Chief of the General Staff of the Armenian Armed Forces, Colonel-General Onik Gasparyan will continue his service to the homeland and the people and remains the supreme military commander of the Armed Forces until the expiration of the 8-day term (after the president applies to the Constitutional Court, other deadlines come into force),” the statement reads. 

The president will announce his decision in the coming hours – Artur Vanetsyan

Panorama, Armenia
March 3 2021

The meeting of the representative of the opposition Homeland Salvation Movement with the President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian has ended. 

“We met with the president and discussed the issue of submitting the draft decree on dismissing the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces to the Constitutional Court. The President took note of our position and informed he would announce about the decision in the coming hours,” Vanetsyan told reporters. 

Earlier, the representatives of the opposition demanded an urgent meeting with the President. As the Movement said in a released statement, they considered the president’s position on the Chief of the General Staff of the Armenian Armed Forces  quite concerning. The statement came, after President announced he had applied  to the Constitutional Court with a request to determine the constitutionality of only the law “On the Status of Military Service and Servicemen” but failed to turn to the Court to determine the compliance of the decree decree itself on relieving the Chief of the General Staff of his duties.  

Carey Cavanaugh: Situation in Nagorno-Karabakh not more durable than after the fighting back in the 1990s

Panorama, Armenia
March 3 2021

Former US Special Negotiator for Nagorno-Karabakh and Eurasian Conflicts Carey Cavanaugh has commented on the developments in Nagorno-Karabakh after the recent war, insisting the situation today after the fighting is no more durable than the situation after the fighting back in the 1990s.

“Aliyev has said repeatedly, and I disagree, that ‘diplomatic solutions were never there, he solved it, solved it with military force.’ I would argue it’s not solved,”  Cavanaugh tweeted excepts from his interview on the topic. 

In the words of the former co-chairman, the Nagorno-Karabakh still lacks definitive peace settlement and without it one can never get beyond the risk of a re-eruption of hostilities.

”Situation can be resolved, can be negotiated – but can’t simply fight and solve,” added he. 

There is one provocateur in our country and his name is Nikol Pashinyan, opposition politician says

Panorama, Armenia
March 3 2021

“We have never resorted to provocations and will never do. There is only one provocateur in our country and his name is Nikol Pashinyan,” the coordinator at opposition Homeland Salvation Movement Ishkhan Saghatelyan told reporters on Wednesday. 

Saghatelyan’s remarks came when asked to comment on the heightened security measures undertaken in the vicinity of the building of the National Assembly with opposition staging a rally with the central Baghramyan avenue shut down and barricaded for the sixth consecutive day. 

Saghatelyan noted that Pashinyan’s movement in Armenia is now possible only accompanied by large police forces which has been the result of all his actions being in power. 

The opposition representative stressed that Pashinyan will bear full responsibility for any incident that may happen and its iconsequences. 

“We will never make provocations since this is a matter of national political struggle for us, and our aim is to complete this cause. “

To note, Pashinyan is expected to visit the National Assembly at 16.30 where the cabinet members are set to hold a Q/A session with lawmakers. 

Serzh Sargsyan responds to allegations about him being behind the statement of the General Staff

Panorama, Armenia
March 3 2021

Armenia’s third President Serzh Sargsyan responded to allegations that the statement issued days ago by the General Staff of the Armenian Armed Forced to demand Pashinyan’s resignation was prompted by him. 

Sargsyan talked to reporters on Wednesday.  Asked whether the information that the former president urged the Chief of the General Staff to come up with the statement corresponds to reality, Sargsyan said: “This allegation is as true as the statements by the capitulant about the constructive approach by Aliyev, about Shushi, being an Azerbaijani town, Iskander missile systems exploding by 10 percent and that Iskander is a weapon of the 80s,” Sargsyan said, referring to Armenian PM Pashinyan’s recent controversial statements. 

Sargsyan also promised to address all accumulated questions soon. 

Security guard caught on camera with a gun pointed to protesters from balcony of the parliament building

Panorama, Armenia
March 3 2021

Politics 19:33 03/03/2021Armenia

Dozens of armed security guards were deployed on Wednesday in the building of the National Assembly, as PM Pashinyan  expected to attend the parliamentary Q/A session with lawmakers. 

The security guards were noticed next to the windows of the building by protesters who were holding a rally on Baghramyan avenue right in front of the parliament building.   

One of the protesters caught a security guard on camera at the balcony of the parliament building with a gun pointed in direction of the protest participants. 

As reported earlier, police forces in anti-riot gear  were deployed at the scene stun grenades were moved to the park of the National Assembly ahead of Pashinyan’s visit. 

Opposition leader says ‘drastic actions’ might be needed

Panorama, Armenia
March 3 2021

The opposition Homeland Salvation Movement will hold meetings in Armenian regions in the coming days, the candidate for the post of interim prime minister from opposition Vazgen Manukyan stated on Wednesday during the rally on Baghramyan Avenue. Manukyan said that on March 6 another rally is planned on Baghramyan. 

“We will visit provinces with the representatives of the Movement. Our voice is not heard there where people watch only H1 (ed. Public TV Channel). On Saturday, we will hold a rally at 15.00,” said Manukyan. 

He next didn’t exclude drastic actions might be needed.  “Developments may prompt us to take drastic actions,” added Manukyan.

Azerbaijani press: Italian Parliament demands provision of maps of mined areas of Azerbaijan (PHOTO)

BAKU, Azerbaijan, March 2

Trend:

The Permanent Commission on Foreign Affairs of the Lower House of the Italian Parliament adopted a resolution on the implementation of agreements between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Trend reports.

The document calls on the parties to take constructive actions to facilitate demining operations in the liberated regions of Azerbaijan, and in this regard, it is proposed to provide maps of mined areas.

The resolution says that the Azerbaijani side fulfilled its obligations under the trilateral statement, returned all Armenian prisoners of war taken before and during the war.

The document calls on the Italian government to support the initiatives of the UN, OSCE and the European Union to fully implement the Statement of November 9, 2020 and call for the release of all prisoners of war. The Italian government has also been tasked with working with the governments of both countries on a bilateral level to advance confidence-building measures to establish a future peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

At the same time, the Italian government has been instructed to call on the parties to take constructive action to facilitate demining operations and provide maps of minefields.

Turkish press: If not against coups, then when?

Protesters run while holding homemade shields after tear gas was fired during a demonstration against the military coup in Yangon, Myanmar, March 1, 2021. (AFP Photo)

Military intervention in politics is constituted one of the most significant threats for democracies around the world. Although many around the world forget the extent of this threat for the democratic regimes around the world, the coups and military interventions remind themselves for many through its presence.

This week is the 24th anniversary of the Feb. 28 military intervention in Turkish politics, when the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) organized a “post-modern coup” against the democratically elected Turkish government.

Later, the coup perpetrators stated that the coup was a post-modern one because the military mobilized some other institutions, including the media, against the government.

Today, this intervention is remembered as one of the darkest moments of the history of Turkish democracy. Although the generals, who organized the coup, once said that the Feb. 28 process would continue for the next “1,000 years,” the Turkish public reacted to the coup during the elections and ended the process.

In the last month alone in two different countries, we have seen military intervention in politics. In the first days of February in Myanmar, known in recent years for its egregious human rights violations against Rohingya Muslims, the military overthrew the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi.

The deposed prime minister was put on house arrest, and the military declared a yearlong state of emergency in the country.

Later the military also declared the previous election that brought Suu Kyi to power was invalid. This was not the first time the military intervened in politics in Myanmar; however, this time the intervention generated huge public reactions from the people in Myanmar.

Since the military intervention, it has been almost a month of widespread demonstrations in the country. Last weekend, these demonstrations spread to different cities across Myanmar, and different societal groups also started to join the demonstrations.

Despite the heavy-handed police response against the demonstrators, there is no sign of stopping these demonstrations.

While the discussion on the military intervention in Myanmar is still fresh in the international community, news broke that in Armenia as there was an attempt by the military to overthrow the government.

Although initially there was confusion about the developments in the country, it was soon revealed that the military in the country asked for the resignation of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian.

Pashinian made a statement through his Facebook account and said that he considers the statement of the general staff as an attempt at a military coup. He also asked his supporters to join him in the main square of the Armenian capital in order to respond to the calls from the military.

In both countries, the situation is still unstable. There is a fear of increasing military crackdown in Myanmar due to the rising number of protests in the country.

In Armenia, there is still a lot of uncertainty about the potential developments in the next few days.

However, the developments in both countries demonstrated that the coups are not a page from history. Some elements within the military continue to violate the norms of active civilian control of the military and attempt to gain control of the government by overthrowing the democratically elected governments.

The international community has so far failed to respond to these military interventions from a principled position.

In 2013, the U.S. failed to call the coup in Egypt a coup, and then-U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry called it a “restoration of democracy” by the military.

In the Myanmar coup, we again see an inconsistent attitude. This time, China and Russia blocked a U.N. resolution condemning the coup at the U.N. Security Council (UNSC).

This pattern in reaction to the coup will not bring any good for the nascent democracies and will be interpreted as a green light by some ambitious generals in the world.

If this position will continue, we will continue to see coups not as part of history but in the current news of the newspapers.