Galust Sahakyan: 2008 Is Not The Last Chance Of The Opposition

GALUST SAHAKYAN: 2008 IS NOT THE LAST CHANCE OF THE OPPOSITION

Lragir, Armenia
Aug 15 2007

According to Galust Sahakyan, member of the Republican faction,
the political forces are currently conducting a policy of intelligence.

The member of parliament spoke about it on August 15 at the Pastark
Club where he touched upon the political summer and the likely
developments. The member of parliament also gives a peculiar
description of the quest for a common candidate for the opposition.

Galust Sahakyan compares it with flirting.

He says for the opposition it is not appropriate to run in the
presidential election only to have a president. The Republican member
of parliament is sure that it is necessary to put up a program, a
political team, a new approach. The Republican member of parliament
says it is no longer possible to win over the votes of people with
populism. "As to the Republicans, like during the past peaceful
summers, in this hot summer we work, we work towards solving the
problems of the political party, enhancing the offices, the branches.

The representatives of our council visit the regions, not for
propaganda but for preparations," Galust Sahakyan says. He says,
however, that the weak point of the Republican Party remains the
inability to advertise what they do because they lack populism.

Nevertheless, Galust Sahakyan is convinced that the Republican
candidate will win the election. However, he calls on the leaders
of the opposition, although most of them are rather advanced in age,
not to think that the election of 2008 is their last chance. If they
think so, they may make unpredictable moves in case of failure.

"Therefore, I am saying it is important that the opposition and
the government discuss and decide what moves will be made after
the results become known," Galust Sahakyan says. He considers it
impossible, however, that the opposition and the pro-government
forces will put up a common candidate like the case in Karabakh,
as Artashes Geghamyan had suggested.

US Analyst: Georgia Is "Unpredictable Neighbor" For Armenia

US ANALYST: GEORGIA IS "UNPREDICTABLE NEIGHBOR" FOR ARMENIA

Regnum, Russia
Aug 14 2007

Turkey’s joining the European Union can play a positive role for
Armenia, US analyst Richard Kirakosian announced at a news conference
in Yerevan today. A REGNUM correspondent quotes him as saying that
EU membership envisages reduction of the country’s military reserves.

"In this case, Turkey will pose less threat to Armenia in the military
point of view," the expert noted.

According to the analyst, Turkey’s membership in the European Union
can pose problems for the European community, which is facing the
threat of Islamic terror.

As for Armenia’s geopolitical position in the South Caucasus area,
according to Kirakosian, Yerevan is facing not only the question of
the Armenian Genocide recognition by Ankara, but the blockade carried
out by Turkey and Azerbaijan, as all those factors are hampering
economic development of the country. Moreover, opening borders with
Armenia are a positive factor for Turkey as well. "It will add to
the economic development of Kurdish areas in the Turkish territory,
which will become guarantee of stability in the country," he said.

As for another Armenia’s neighbor, Georgia, Kirakosian called it
"unpredictable." As the analyst believes, the country is every time
using its position "as a kind of bridge between Armenia and Russia."

He also noted that in the situation when Georgia is aspiring to Europe,
and Azerbaijan to Central Asia, one of primary tasks for Armenia is
the way to the European integration. "Otherwise, Yerevan can be left
alone," he said.

However, the most serious threat for Armenia is coming from the inside
instead from the outside. "Bribery is ripening in Armenia and the
good governance is under regress," concluded Richard Kirakosian.

A Watergate researcher’s story, 30 years later

The Washington Times
August 12, 2007 Sunday

A Watergate researcher’s story, 30 years later

By John R. Coyne Jr., SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

In 1977, after the Nixon/ Frost interviews – 28 hours of taped
material edited down to four 90-minute sessions and seen on prime
time television by more than 50 million viewers – Bill Buckley wrote:
"It is probably inevitable that no matter how often one takes the
pledge not to write again on the desolate and sad subject of Richard
Nixon, it is bound to happen: again and again and again. . . . an
endless succession of books."

That was 30 years ago, and with each new release of tapes, books
continue to pour out – most of them still by Nixon-loathers like
James Reston Jr., son of a famous father, New York Timesman James
Reston, who had the distinction of making Nixon’s enemies list. (The
elder Reston endeared himself to some of us in 1973 when, just before
the tom-toms began to beat in Baltimore, he found in Vice President
Spiro Agnew the "personification of the old American verities.")

Some might say, of course, that this isn’t really a book at all. For
one thing, it’s very small, about the size of a quality paperback,
with a minimal number of words per page and lots of padding –
probably fewer than 100 pages in normal book format.

For another, it apparently wasn’t intended as a book when first
written, but rather as a combination of work notes and a narrative
summary of Mr. Reston’s experience as David Frost’s Watergate
researcher.

Some of the writing is bad, painfully self-aware ("Unpersuaded, I
screwed up my face quizzically"); some of it forced, padded with
academic assistant-professorish conceits (Nixon as Proteus, Nixon as
Aristotelean tragic figure, Richard Nixon as Richard the Third); and
some of it just unpleasant ("The breaking of Richard Nixon was indeed
pleasurable to me . . .").

There might be questions about the provenance of this text. And if in
1977 it was thrown into a drawer unpublished, and then forgotten, how
did it come to the attention of Peter Morgan, who just happened to be
writing a play about the interviews?

But the most questionable claim is made in the subtitle: "The Untold
Story of the Nixon/Frost Interviews." Actually, Mr. Frost told the
whole story, and told it well, in his own book, "I Gave Them a Sword:
Behind the Scenes of the Nixon Interviews," published by Morrow in
1978.

It’s an intelligent, well-written and comprehensive account, and
nothing in Mr. Reston’s book adds anything new to it – except for Mr.
Reston’s personal view of the importance of his own role in the
process. Mr. Reston does not mention Mr. Frost’s book anywhere in his
text.

When Mr. Frost hired Mr. Reston as the Watergate researcher for the
interviews on the recommendation of Reston family friend Joseph
Kraft, he knew what he was getting. Mr. Reston, at the time an
instructor at the University of North Carolina, had in Mr. Frost’s
words "passion and creativity," but he lacked "logic and tactical
intuition." His views, wrote Mr. Frost, were "representative of a
considerable body of opinion in both the academic and journalistic
communities."

"Jim regarded Nixon as the epitome of evil," wrote Mr. Frost. "What
he seemed to want [for the interviews] was a psychohistory of the
Nixon presidency which would at once explain the dark mind of Richard
Nixon and the dark forces in American society."

(This was also the hope of Mr. Reston’s academic mentors, Fawn Brodie
and James David Barber, whose own loathing for Nixon bordered on the
dark, if not the pathological. During the tapings, Mr. Reston says,
he smuggled out copies of the sessions to Barber and Brodie, a firing
offense if discovered by Mr. Frost. And that is an untold story.)

Mr. Reston traces his loathing of Nixon to Vietnam, a loathing he
facilely transfers to the current president: "Again the nation is in
a failing, elective war. A Nixon successor is again charged with
abuse of power in covering up and distorting crucial facts as he
dragged the country, under false pretenses, into war."

Mr. Reston draws a line from Nixon to Mr. Bush, and that will no
doubt figure heavily in the movie being made from the play that was
made from this book – due to be released in 2008, just before the
elections.

Of course, in the case of Vietnam, if we were to draw that line, it
would be more accurate to begin with John Kennedy, who started it
(the Eisenhower administration, of which Nixon was a part, opposed
any involvement in Indochina), then down through Lyndon Johnson, who
widened it, escalated it and threw the whole mess into Nixon’s lap.

And like it or not, after strenuous and sustained diplomatic effort,
Nixon ended it. But no matter. As Mr. Reston puts it, "I was too much
a product of my own generation, especially in its horror over
Vietnam, to be interested in the mechanics of diplomacy."

This loathing is endemic, translating into contempt, frequently
expressed in snide, nasty characterizations of those whose purity of
anti-Nixon thought is suspect. He refers to his fellow Frost
strategist and the executive editor of the interviews, Robert
Zelnick, now a journalism professor at Boston University, as "Affable
Bob" and "Old Zel," poking fun at his demeanor, his experience and
his knowledge of Washington.

He visits Charles Colson, laughs at his appearance and mocks his
commitment to Christ. Describing the Nixon staffers involved in the
interviews (he calls them "hangers-on"), he is both offensive and
careless. "Old Zel’s counterpart was one Ken Khachigian, an
unprepossessing Iranian."

He makes fun of Mr. Khachigian’s appearance (this is something Mr.
Reston, a somewhat shambling, aging preppy type, does frequently),
casts aspersions on his honesty on the basis of an entry in a
Jonathan Schell book and concludes: "I wanted as little to do with
Khachigian as possible."

The feeling was no doubt mutual. For nearly four decades now, Mr.
Khachigian has been known among people of both parties as a highly
talented political writer and a strategist of unquestioned honesty.
Nor is he an "Iranian." Mr. Khachigian is an Armenian American, and
proud of it.

There’s no doubt the Nixon/ Frost interviews created high drama. But
was it really the drama Mr. Reston imagines? And was Mr. Reston’s
role really as significant as he believes it to have been?

His chief contribution – and the deus ex machina of the Morgan play –
was the discovery of three taped conversations with Mr. Colson that
suggested Nixon had discussed a cover-up earlier than thought.

But as Elizabeth Drew, no friend of Nixon, points out, the Watergate
prosecutors thought the tapes insignificant. Nor was Mr. Reston’s
discovery – what he proudly calls "the Colson trap" – sufficient to
carry the drama in the Morgan play, so that it was finally necessary
to invent a drunken phone call from Nixon to Mr. Frost.

Mr. Reston sees a broken Nixon emerging from the interviews. But
Robert Zelnick sees a much different man.

"[T]he Frost/Nixon interviews proved cathartic," Mr. Zelnick wrote in
a recent Weekly Standard, "providing Richard Nixon with the
opportunity to acknowledge his role in the Watergate coverup . . . It
also gave Americans the opportunity to see him pained, contrite, and
unthreatening. . . . Over a period of 16 years he wrote nine
bestsellers, most dealing with profound questions of national
security."

During that period Nixon traveled to more than 30 foreign countries,
where his views were solicited by national leaders, and in this
country he was consulted by Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole and George H.W.
Bush, among others. All in all, as Mr. Zelnick puts it, a "striking
return to political grace."

Mr. Reston would disagree strongly, having written himself into
history as the Nixon/Frost interviewer who destroyed Richard Nixon.
But Ms. Drew, for one, will have none of it. As she puts it, "the
interviews attracted a huge worldwide audience, and Frost’s career
and Nixon’s rehabilitation effort were enhanced considerably."

And that, despite Mr. Reston’s little book, the play and – who knows?
– the movie, is the way it really was.

John R. Coyne Jr., a former White House speechwriter, is co-author
with Linda Bridges of "Strictly Right: William F. Buckley Jr. and the
American Conservative Movement," published by Wiley.

By James Reston Jr.

Harmony Books, $22, 207 pages

Lebanon: U.S. Backs Free Elections, Only to See Allies Lose

NYTimes.com

August 10, 2007
Memo From Dubai

dleeast/10arab.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

U .S. Backs Free Elections, Only to See Allies Lose

By HASSAN M. FATTAH

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates Aug. 9 – Lebanon’s political spin masters have
been trying in recent days to explain the results of last Sunday’s pivotal
by-election, which saw a relatively unknown candidate from the opposition
narrowly beat a former president, Amin Gemayel.
There has been talk of the Christian vote and the Armenian vote, of history
and betrayal, as each side sought to claim victory. There is one
explanation, however, that has become common wisdom in the region: Mr.
Gemayel’s doom seems to have been sealed by his support from the Bush
administration and the implied agendas behind its backing.
"It’s the kiss of death," said Turki al-Rasheed, a Saudi reformer who
watched last Sunday’s elections closely. "The minute you are counted on or
backed by the Americans, kiss it goodbye, you will never win."
The paradox of American policy in the Middle East – promoting democracy on
the assumption it will bring countries closer to the West – is that almost
everywhere there are free elections, the American-backed side tends to lose.
Lebanon’s voters in the Metn district, in other words, appeared to have
joined the Palestinians, who voted for Hamas; the Iraqis, who voted for a
government sympathetic to Iran; and the Egyptians, who have voted in growing
numbers in recent elections for the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood. "No
politician can afford to identify with the West because poll after poll
shows people don’t believe in the U.S. agenda," said Mustafa Hamarneh, until
recently the director of the Center for Strategic Studies at the University
of Jordan. Mr. Hamarneh is running for a seat in Jordan’s Parliament in
November, but he says he has made a point of keeping his campaign focused
locally, and on bread-and-butter issues. "If somebody goes after you as
pro-American he can hurt you," he said.
In part, regional analysts say, candidates are tainted by the baggage of
American foreign policy – from its backing of Israel to the violence in
Iraq. But more important, they say, American support is often applied to one
faction instead of to institutions, causing further division rather than
bringing stability.
"The Americans think that supporting democracy should create positive
reactions," said Nicola Nassif, a columnist with the left-leaning Lebanese
daily Al Akhbar. "No one can be against democracy, sovereignty, independence
and freedom. But not if it upsets the internal power balance, not if it
empowers one party against the other, especially in a country where
supporting one group can lead to violence and even civil wars."
Arab liberals who have embraced America continue to see their influence fade
in the region, as more conservative and Islamist forces continue to rise,
Mr. Rasheed said. Voters invariably frown on strength coming from abroad, he
said; the only legitimate sources of strength any Arab politician can turn
to is based on either tribal power or religious ties.
"Last Sunday we saw that even if you are a former president running for a
seat in Parliament, in a small area where everybody knows you, you can’t
make it either with American support," Mr. Rasheed said.
For much of the past year, Lebanon has been caught in a major confrontation
between the American-backed March 14th movement, which helped force Syria
out of Lebanon in 2005 and won a parliamentary majority that year, and the
Iranian- and Syrian-backed opposition movement led by Hezbollah and Gen.
Michel Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement.
Sunday’s vote was widely seen as a bellwether for the country’s political
leanings in that confrontation.
Lebanon’s Christians are generally more sympathetic to the United States
than are other Arabs. But the tension between Prime Minister Fouad Siniora’s
American-backed faction against an Iranian-backed one was palpable in last
Sunday’s election.
And despite an expected sympathy vote – Mr. Gemayel was running to fill the
seat vacated by the assassination of his son Pierre – and the former
president’s name recognition, Lebanese Christians in the mountainous Metn
region, along with a smattering of Shiites and others who live there, voted
for the more unlikely team: one allied to Hezbollah, seemingly sympathetic
to Iran and Syria, and most of all, in opposition to America.
"Our problem with March 14th is not that they are aligned with the U.S., but
it is their policies," says Alain Aoun, a nephew of General Aoun, who says
American support has magnified tensions while emboldening the ruling
majority to resist compromises. "We call on the U.S. to learn from this
experience; they should not take part in any internal conflict or take
sides. They should support all Lebanese."
The problem is not necessarily the support itself, Mr. Nassif said, but that
it invariably skews conflicts, worsening rather than easing sectarian and
ethnic tensions.
"When the U.S. interferes in favor of one party, their interference leads to
an explosion," he said. "The U.S. openly says it supports the Siniora
government, but it should say we support the Lebanese government."
There was, however, one American intervention that did work in Lebanon, Mr.
Nassif notes.
"In 1958 when the U.S. interfered militarily in Lebanon, it said it was to
help Lebanon regain stability," he said, speaking of President Dwight D.
Eisenhower’s decision to deploy 14,000 men to shore up the government of
President Camille Chamoun and open the way for his successor, Gen. Fuad
Chehab. The intervention is credited with preventing the Syrian and Egyptian
governments from destabilizing the country.
"Chehab was soon after elected, and no one protested their presence here; a
few months later they withdrew," Mr. Nassif said of the American forces. "In
1982, they interfered militarily again and it ended in a disaster. They
supported Israel and Gemayel against the Palestinians, who were supported by
Lebanese parties."
Mr. Nassif added, "Since then, every time the Americans interfere, it ends
in a war or in their expulsion."
Nada Bakri contributed reporting from Beirut, Lebanon.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/10/world/mid

Boxing: Universum Vs Sauerland: Khoren Gevor Vs Arthur Abraham

UNIVERSUM VS SAUERLAND: KHOREN GEVOR VS ARTHUR ABRAHAM

EastsideBoxing.com
http://www.eastsidebox ing.com/news.php?p=12009&more=1
Aug 9 2007

Finally the wait is over: Universum middleweight Khoren Gevor in
a world title fight! The #5 of the IBF rankings is the mandatory
challenger of world champion Arthur Abraham. Both fighters, who are
German citizens with Armenian roots, will face each other on August
18 at the Max-Schmeling-Halle in Berlin..

Not only the sporting career of the Universum fighter Khoren Gevor
had some eventful and unusual moments but also his private life. He
started boxing when he was 12 years old. Ever since, the Armenian born
dreamed of winning a world championship belt. As a Amateur he won six
national Armenian titles. But Khoren didn’t see his boxing future in
Armenia and therefore he immigrated to Germany at the age of 16 in
order to fulfil his dream there. When he arrived in Germany he lived
in a children’s home in a town named Gunzenhausen in Bavaria for the
following three years. As there was no boxing club nearby he had to
travel 2 hrs every day to Nuremberg and train there. The survivalist
Gevor had more obstacles to take than expected to remain in Germany
and continue his boxing dream in the following years.

After a very successful Amateur career with 72 wins in 75 fights
and six national Armenian titles he turned pro in 2000. Khoren Gevor
signed a contract with Universum Box-Promotion and worked together
with Torsten Schmitz in 13 fights. Afterwards he was trained by
Michael Timm and Magomed Schaburow before his final switch to Fritz
Sdunek. He is a very ambitious athlete, sometime a bit overambitious
so that his trainer and father figure Sdunek says "if I don’t kick
him out of the gym he won’t stop his training". Besides he writes
down his weight and his meals daily. Although there are a great team,
Gevor states about his daily notes: "He is not inside my body and
I’m doing this for myself."

The 28 year old middleweight is an absolute family person. His wife
Nenel is expecting their first child in September but he is also
a stepfather to her sons Abel (14) and Norayr (16). Both are also
boxers – fighting for a club in Hamburg – and have already become
Northern Germany champions. Whenever they have some free time they
are studying boxing videos of the idol: "Dad" Khoren. Gevor doesn’t
have a driving license so he loves to ride his bike and besides he
loves to build his own car models. On every occasion he is spending
time in front of his computer and works on his small racing car.

After his boxing career he wants to work as a 3D graphic designer
to devote to his passion of cars although he can only drive it with
a controller.

His only two defeats were in 2002 when he lost against Lukas
Konecny in a fight for the International German Championship at light
middleweight. He lost both fights due to intentional head butts by the
Czech which caused heavy cuts above the eyes. Since than he has won
the WBO and IBF Interconti belt. After a long wait he is now ready to
face Artur Abraham for the IBF world championship at middleweight. It
will be his 30th fight.

"I have waited for this moment for so long and here I am. I’m
undertaking a tough training preparation to be in the best shape for
this challenge and dethrone the world champion", the highly motivated
Gevor states. "When I know that there is somebody better than me
than I will retire!"

Also Coach Fritz Sdunek is happy for Khoren and is looking forward
to this tough challenge: "Khoren deserves this chance more than
anybody and he worked so hard. He was already so close before this
chance came up. Our preparation was very intense and we know that
Abraham can be beaten!"

PRESSETERMINE BERLIN / PRESS TIMETABLE BOXGALA AM 18.08.2007,
MAX-SCHMELING-HALLE, BERLIN

Montag, 13.08., 13.00 Uhr / Monday, Aug 13, 1.00 pm Offentliches
Pressetraining / Public work out Ort / Place: Axel-Springer-Passage,
Markgrafenstrasse 19 a, 10888 Berlin

Mittwoch, 15.08., 13.00 Uhr / Wednesday, Aug 15, 1.00 pm
Pressekonferenz / Press conference Ort / Place: Hotel Maritim pro Arte,
Friedrichstrasse 151, 10117 Berlin

Anschließend Fototermin Arthur Abraham und Khoren Gevor vor dem
Brandenburger Tor

Freitag, 17.08., 16.00 Uhr / Friday, Aug 17, 4.00 pm Offizielles Wiegen
/ Weigh-in Ort / Place: Hotel Maritim pro Arte, Friedrichstrasse 151,
10117 Berlin

–Boundary_(ID_IfJqfgG0r8HlSz4IO50TQw)–

Armenian Peacekeepers In Iraq To Be Honored For Their Services

ARMENIAN PEACEKEEPERS IN IRAQ TO BE HONORED FOR THEIR SERVICES

ARMENPRESS
Aug 07 2007

YEREVAN, AUGUST 7, ARMENPRESS: A spokesman for Armenian defense
ministry said in a ceremony on August 9 the chief of the general
staff of the armed forces Seyran Ohanian will honor members of the
fifth shift of the Armenian non-combat platoon in Iraq for their
distinguished services in reconstruction of the post-war Iraq.

Armenia sent a fresh sixth contingent of non-combat troops to serve
in the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq on July 18.

The 46-member platoon, including five medics, sappers and truck
drivers, replaced the same number of troops deployed six months ago.

The Armenian troops have been deployed to Iraq since January 2005,
and parliament voted in December 2006 to extend the deployment for
another year. The contingent serves under Polish command.

BAKU: Azerbaijan Cannot Cancel Visa Regime With Turkey

AZERBAIJAN CAN NOT CANCEL VISA REGIME WITH TURKEY

Trend News Agency, Azerbaijan
July 31 2007

Azerbaijan, Baku /corr. Trend E.Huseynli / Azerbaijan may not cancel
the visa regime with other countries, including Turkey, the Consul
General of Azerbaijan to Turkey, Sayyad Aran, informed on 31 July
by telephone.

"Canceling the visa regime may be possible only after settlement of
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and consolidation of borders. Currently
Armenia may use the opening of the Azerbaijani borders for their
interests. The risk of occurrence of various provocations in Azerbaijan
increases," Aran said.

According to 19 July 2007 decision of the Cabinet of Ministers
of Turkey, non-vise regime will be introduced for the citizens of
Azerbaijan, Mongolia, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan who
have citizen passports needed only for the tourist visas to Turkey
with a period of up to 30 days.

Hovannisian and Heritage Kick Off Congressional Campaign

PRESS RELEASE
The Heritage Party
31 Moscovian Street
Yerevan, Armenia
Tel.: (+374 – 10) 53.69.13
Fax: (+374 – 10) 53.26.97
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Website:

August 1, 2007

Hovannisian and Heritage Kick Off Congressional Campaign

Talin, Armenia–The Heritage Party today launched Raffi Hovannisian’s
campaign to represent the 15th electoral district in Armenia’s
National Assembly. The constituency, which includes 84 precincts in
the marzes of Aragatsotn and Armavir and stretches from the slopes of
Mt. Aragats to the banks of the Arax River, will hold the election to
fill its vacancy in Parliament on August 26.

Raffi Hovannisian is joined by six other candidates in the race for
this last of the Republic’s 41 majoritarian seats. If elected,
Hovannisian will represent the 15th district in the Armenian
legislature, while his current proportional (party-list) seat will be
assumed by Movses Aristakesian, an economist and former deputy
minister of statistics, who is the next candidate up on the Heritage
list that won the vote of public confidence on May 12.

Founded in 2002, Heritage has regional divisions throughout the land.
Its central office is located at 31 Moscovian Street, Yerevan 0002,
Armenia, with telephone contact at (374-10) 536.913, fax at (374-10)
532.697, email at [email protected] or [email protected], and website
at

www.heritage.am
www.heritage.am

Fuad Siniora: Armenia Going To Become One Of Lebanon’s Best Economic

FUAD SINIORA: ARMENIA GOING TO BECOME ONE OF LEBANON’S BEST ECONOMIC PARTNERS

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.07.2007 17:24 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Siniora said he is
one of the initiators of the Lebanese investments into Armenia’s
economy. "I am one of those who inspired Lebanese companies, including
the well-known Biblos bank, to work in Armenia," Mr Siniora said in
an interview with the Public Armenian Television.

The time will come when Armenia will become one of Lebanon’s best
economic partners while the latter will be Armenia’s outlet to the
Arab world, he said.

The Lebanese Prime Minister noted that Armenia will be the first
country he is planning to visit after the resolution of the internal
crisis in Lebanon.

Armenian FM: Construction Of Kars-Akhalkalaki Railway Unpromising Po

ARMENIAN FM: CONSTRUCTION OF KARS-AKHALKALAKI RAILWAY UNPROMISING POLITICAL STEP

arminfo
2007-07-30 13:27:00

"The Georgian region of Samtskhe-Javakheti, which is populated
mainly with Armenians, is in the focus of attention of the Armenian
Government. We are cooperating with Georgian authorities to improve
the social-economic situation of local Armenians. For this purpose,
I need a first hand view of the situation in the region and meeting
with local population because I have never been here before," Armenian
Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan said in front of the Holy Cross
Church in the town of Akhalkalaki.

Javakhq-info reports during his visit to the region, the Minister
Oskanyan visited also the Georgian Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic
Church and met Armenian community representatives. He promised to
submit the Armenian Government an offer to make Armenian the state
language in the region. As regards the compulsory knowledge of the
Georgian language, the minister proposed the local Armenians to
require some 10-15 years from the Georgian Government to master the
language and study the Georgian culture. The minister did not comment
on the issues regarding the establishment of the Armenian-Georgian
University and dislocation of a Georgian military base in the place
of the Russian one in the region. As regards the construction of
Kars-Akhalkalaki railway, the minister called it a wrong political
step and a useless investment. "One could achieve the same goal
spending less and exploiting the railway existing in the territory
of Armenia. This step is an unpromising policy," Vardan Oskanyan said.

The minister also touched upon the social-economic situation in the
region, which, in his opinion, needs more targeted investing. He said
the problem is on the agenda of Armenia and Georgia. We have progress,
he minister said.