Pashinyan Hightlights Armenian Genocide, Wilson’s ’14 Points’ in Address at Armistice Event

Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan addresses the Paris Peace Conference on Nov. 11, 2018

PARIS—The circumstances that led to the Armenian Genocide, as well as President Woodrow Wilson’s famous “14 Points” that have served as a blueprint for among other things the establishment of the United Nations, as well as Wilson’s vision of an independent Armenia, were highlighted by Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Sunday in a speech he delivered at the Paris Peace Conference that took place following an event marking the centennial of the World War I Armistice.

Pashinyan lamented that although the crimes against Armenians were condemned and later those crimes will be called the first genocide of the 20th century, lessons from the Armenian Genocide were not taken by the international community, thus resulting in the Holocaust, the Cambodian and Rwandan genocides.

“It was during World War One that the Allied powers, for the first time ever, used the definition ‘crimes against humanity and civilization,’ thus condemning the Ottoman rulers for the extermination of 1.5 million Armenians. Later, this horrendous crime was to be termed the first genocide of the 20th century,” said Pashinyan.

Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and his wife, Anna Hakopyan are greeted by French President Emanuel Macron

“Nevertheless, only few decades later mankind went through the Holocaust, the genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, the genocides of the Christians and Yezidis in the Middle East, the violence against the Rohingya people,” added Pashinyan.

Armenia’s acting prime minister also pointed to Wilson’s 14 Points to draw attention to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the Artsakh people’s right to self-determination—a concept highlighted by the U.S. president as an inalienable right of all people.

“The decades-long struggle of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh to determine their destiny has not received its proper legal solution. In the 21th century it is absolutely unacceptable that people’s mere desire to exercise its right to self-determination may turn into an existential menace,” said Pashinyan.

Pashinyan had joined leaders from around the world to commemorate the end of World War I when on November 11, 1918 an agreement was signed putting an end to all combat operations in the War. This document served as a precursor for the Versailles Treaty and the Paris Peace Conference, both of which took place in 1919, with representatives of the then newly-independent Republic of Armenia taking part.

Among the leaders at the commemoration and the conference were President Donald Trump, President Vladimir Putin of Russia and Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Turkey.

The Conference was opened by introductory remarks made by Paris Peace Conference Executive Committee Vice President Trisha Shetty and French President Emmanuel Macron, followed by speeches delivered by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.

After the speech Pashinyan presented an illustrated book by historian Hayk Demoyan entitled “The Armenian Genocide: Front Page Coverage in the World Media”

After the speech Pashinyan presented an illustrated book by historian Hayk Demoyan entitled “The Armenian Genocide: Front Page Coverage in the World Media” to be included in the Peace Library as Armenia’s contribution.

Pashinyan and his wife, Anna Hakopyan arrived in Paris on Sunday and were greeted by Macron and the French first lady, Brigitte. They then participated in the Armistice Centennial Ceremony joining other world leaders.

Below is the text of Pashinyan’s remarks provided by his press service.

Distinguished Heads of State and Government,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

We have gathered here to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the end of World War One. This is an event of exceptional significance called to pay tribute to collective memory and to articulate our common message of peace.

Today, we, as the leaders of the nations, which participated in that war, should first of all speak about the lessons learnt from the tragedy of World War One.

When a state wages a war or is tempted to solve problems by military means, it believes in its own strength and victory. Yet, World War One became a global tragedy for all the peoples engaged and resulted in the destruction of its mastermind states.

There is a belief, that from the geopolitical and military perspective there are always winners and losers in wars. However, from the human perspective, no one ever wins. Wars bring only loss, misery and devastation.

And regardless of our common efforts and appeals to learn from the previous mistakes, these lessons are easily forgotten.

Even though one hundred years ago, the humanity realized the need to ban weapon of mass destruction, regrettably it has not prevented the creation of new generations of arms.

It was during World War One that the Allied powers, for the first time ever, used the definition “crimes against humanity and civilization,” thus condemning the Ottoman rulers for the extermination of 1,5 million Armenians. Later, this horrendous crime was to be termed the first genocide of the 20th century.

Nevertheless, only few decades later mankind went through the Holocaust, the genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, the genocides of the Christians and Yezidis in the Middle East, the violence against the Rohingya people.

As part of the lessons, learnt from the war the right of the peoples to self-determination was set out in Wilson’s 14 points. Later on it was included in the UN Charter, Helsinki Final Act, and became a basis for the independence of around half of the modern states.

As a result of World War One, the people of the world legally established the right to master their own destiny through the _expression_ of free will. Here, in France I cannot but stress that just days ago, France has clearly reiterated its principled position on this issue: the people of New Caledonia were given the opportunity to conduct a referendum. Painfully, this right is being exercised selectively.

This is why, the decades-long struggle of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh to determine their destiny has not received its proper legal solution. In the 21th century it is absolutely unacceptable that people’s mere desire to exercise its right to self-determination may turn into an existential menace.

As a result of World War One the world established the League of Nations, the prototype for the United Nations, with the ultimate goal of achieving peace.

Nonetheless, the manifestations of extremism in the contemporary world are on the rise. We established those institutions first and foremost to protect human rights. Yet, today we are witnessing daily abuse of the most fundamental human right – the right to life.

After the end of the First World War, many believed that it would be the last ever war fought. However, the Second World War was not long in coming. The humankind entered into a new phase of war and arms race. Unfortunately, up to now we have been unable to put an end to it. Moreover, we get further involved in it every day.

This is why I attach high importance to such meetings. They provide us an opportunity to reflect on our past, on our common history of the humankind. Indeed, we are unable to change that history, and we do not need to. But the history is well able to change us to make our future better.

To this end, we need to learn the most important lesson of World War One. No state can build its success at the cost of others’ misery, no one can gain freedom at the cost of others’ slavery. We put an end to the First World War hundred years ago. And this is a perfect occasion to think of entering a century without wars – a century of peace.

I do believe, that the leaders that have gathered here, in Paris, are well able to achieve it. And this will be the best ever tribute to the innocent victims of the previous century.

“Veolia Water” is trying to defend itself. the company will appeal against the decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine

  • 09.11.2018
  •  

  • Armenia:
  •  

     

1
 192

“Veolia Water” company issued a statement regarding the allegation of abuse of dominant position.


It is said in the statement.


“Veolia Water, as a branch of the Veolia Group with 160 years of experience, implements a clear policy in order to ensure the quality of services provided to its customers and high safety standards and procurement rules, establishing contractual relations with such reliable and established companies that can demonstrate the required experience in the relevant fields and provide convincing evidence of a rich history of activity.


“Veolia Water” CJSC, which is part of the world’s leading operator, is expected to use international best practices as widely as possible and provide existing technologies. Due to this, the company aims to use the highest class products and modern technologies in its activities for the benefit of the country and its customers.


“Veolia Water” company has assumed the highest responsibility towards its subscribers and that is why it will never make concessions in matters related to the safety of water supply and drainage services and water quality assurance in the Republic of Armenia.


The decision of the RA State Commission for the Protection of Economic Competition, according to which “Veolia Water” company “abuses its dominant position”, is a surprise for us. The accusation against “Veolia Water” company is false and unfounded.


“Veolia Water” company is always guided by the requirements of RA laws in its activities. The company regrets that the given decision was made by the RA State Technical University without the presence of the company or any of its management.


“Veolia Water” company will appeal this decision, taking advantage of all opportunities provided by the legislation of the Republic of Armenia.


To remind, at the meeting held on November 7, the State Technical Committee of Ukraine fined Veolia water company 20 million drams for abusing its dominant position.

Jerusalem patriarchs offer mediation between Egyptian, Ethiopian churches over disputed monastery

Egypt Independent
Nov 11 2018



4:05 pm


Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem Theophilos III and Armenian Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem Nourhan Manougian offered to mediate between the Egyptian and Ethiopian churches to settle the issue of Deir Es-Sultan Coptic Orthodox Monastery in Jerusalem, an Egyptian Coptic Orthodox official said on Saturday.

A delegation from the Coptic Orthodox Church is due to arrive in Cairo on Sunday after a four-day visit to Jerusalem commissioned by Coptic Pope Tawadros II, Pope of the Church of Alexandria and Patriarch of the See of St. Mark.

The delegation, headed by Anba Daniel, bishop of Maadi and secretary-general of the Coptic Orthodox Holy Synod, met with Bishop Antonious, bishop of the Metropolitan of Jerusalem and the Gulf countries, to show support for him and the right of the Coptic Orthodox Church over Deir Es-Sultan Coptic Orthodox Monastery in Jerusalem.

In statements to Al-Masry Al-Youm on Saturday, Anba Daniel said that they met during the visit with the Greek Orthodox and Armenian Orthodox patriarchs, who offered to mediate between the two churches to solve the issue in a friendly manner.

The delegation also met with Egypt’s ambassador to Israel, who was very cooperative and stressed the full coordination of the Egyptian Foreign Ministry with the Coptic Church for its right to the monastery, which cannot be debated.

Anba Daniel suggested that the delegation may visit Ethiopia to hold talks on the issue. “Despite the problem of the monastery, there are church relations at the highest level between the Ethiopian and Coptic churches,” he said.

According to the Coptic Church, the history of the monastery dates back to the reign of Sultan Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan (684-705 AD), who granted it to the Copts, who named it after him as Deir Es-Sultan Monastery. The Coptic Orthodox Church’s ownership of the monastery was confirmed during the reign of Sultan Salah al-Din al-Ayyubi in the 12th century.

The Coptic Church says that Abyssinian people resorted to the Coptic Church in the last half of the 17th century as a temporary shelter until they solved their problems and returned to their own churches, which were acquired in 1654 by the Greek and Armenian churches because of the inability of the Ethiopian Church to pay taxes. The Coptic Church temporarily hosted the Abyssinian monks as guests in some rooms of the monastery.

On April 25, 1970, during the Easter Mass in the Church of the Resurrection, the Israeli government sent military forces to enable the Ethiopian monks from the monastery to change the locks and take control of the monastery. When Coptic monks learned of this, they rushed to the monastery but the Israeli forces prevented them from entering.

The Bishop of the Copts filed an appeal before the Israeli Supreme Court, which unanimously approved the restoration of the monastery to the Coptic Church on March 16, 1971, but the Israeli government still refuses to implement the Supreme Court ruling to this day.

Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm

Armenia’s banking sector has not seen defaults for 16 years, head of Ameriabank division says

ARKA, Armenia
Nov 4 2018

YEREVAN, November 4. /ARKA/. In an interview with ‘Bankovskoye Obozreniye’ (Banking Review) Hovhannes Khachatryan, head of Assets, Liabilities and Capital Management Division at Ameriabank, speaks about what makes Armenia’s banking sector different from that of Russia, what kind of technologies make it move forward and what are Ameriabank’s market consolidation plans. 

– Hovhannes, what are the distinctive differences between banking in Armenia and Russia?

– The first difference is that we have no state-owned banks in Armenia. All the banks are privately owned. This is why the competition among them is very tense. There are also international players here such as HSBC, VTB, Credit Agricole, etc. Nevertheless, local banks successfully compete with them, and Ameriabank, as a private local bank, has been holding the lead for many years.  

Secondly, Armenia’s bank regulation is much stricter. It has been instrumental in helping local banks avoid defaults over the past 16 years. After a period of “cleansing” in the late 90s and the first years of the new century, the regulation became even more stringent. Our market is more liberal than the Russian one – for example, we have no currency control. 

The reluctance of local banks to finance large government infrastructure projects can be viewed both as an advantage or disadvantage.  In this sense local banks are less exposed to risks. In terms of technology development, if we look at the leading Russian banks, they are more advanced and we still have a lot to learn. This is probably because of a conservative approach shown both by the country’s leadership and, in some cases, the leadership of different banks to all sorts of innovation.

– Are there any special relation between the banking sectors of Russia and Armenia?

– We have good partnership relations with colleagues from Russian banks. But despite the fact that the economies of our countries are mutually integrated, I would not say that the Armenian and Russian banking sectors interact strongly with each other, not counting VTB that has a small retail banking presence in the Armenian market.

– As regards technology, Softline has built a data processing center for Ameriabank this year.  What banking services will it be used for in the future?

-Today, the banking sector is undergoing a fundamental transformation: it is obvious that banks are not going to limit themselves to selling financial services only. For example, the Russian Sberbank is positioning itself as a platform for clients who can use a huge number of services through the so-called one stop window. The task of the bank is to offer the clients the services which they most likely will buy. To do this, banks apply business analysis, artificial intelligence and other related technologies and approaches. 

The banks have accumulated a huge amount of data. We see and understand the need for fast and complex processing of this data, because we are aware of how things will be unwrapping in the future. Of course, this primarily concerns retail products, online lending, more advanced mobile banking solutions or other distance channels. Now it is important for a bank to be able to work with the existing data, be able to enrich the data by using information from different sources. In turn, this imposes new requirements in terms of working with data, applications used for their processing and the performance of computing and network equipment.

Large amounts of data can also be used for marketing decisions, for determining credit limits; by using these technologies, one can improve scoring cards, etc. The infrastructure, which the new data center offers will help to realize all this. When we ordered this project, we asked the consultant to create such a data center that would enable us to have at least three to four years of supplies in terms of equipment, engineering support and network capacity.

– Now, the loan decisions are automated, arent’t they?

– Partially. For some products, human participation is absolutely unnecessry. We want more decisions to be taken automatically and extend this practice from individuals to small and medium-sized businesses. The experience of our colleagues – including that of bankers in Russia – shows that advanced scoring algorithms not only eliminate the human factor (as part of automation process, this is obvious), but also reduce the risks for the bank.

– Can you call information technology an important competitive factor?

– They are not yet an important competition element in our market. Nonetheless, it is the clients, who, based on their needs and everyday life habits, dictate the terms to us. If earlier the banks had to exert efforts to make the clients use some technologies, now it is the clients that demand innovations, since our customer base is younger and more competent in the technological sense. 

For them, especially for the younger generation, all these mobile applications, online banking, p2p transfers are an obligatory part of banking services, although some of the local  banks, especially small banks are not in a hurry to invest in technology, since these solutions are too complicated, expensive, and do not always pay off. But the future is for the new technologies, and the banks that lag behind will not be able to obtain all the diversity of the latest technologies in one day. We need to constantly work on banking IT and grow with customers to the level that awaits us in the next, say, ten years.

– The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) owns a share in Ameriabank. Does this have an impact on Ameriabank in one way or another?

– In addition to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Asian Development Bank has also had a share in our bank since February 2018. These lending institutions are of great importance for local financial markets, such as the Armenian one, since they set high standards that need to be met not only in order to be credited, but also, in the best cases, to have a share in the authorized capital. These are high risk management standards, public financial reporting, corporate and social responsibility. And even if they do not directly teach us, we just have to constantly raise our level and keep these standards based on their requirements. 

And since our bank plans to conduct an IPO on well-known world markets in the near future, this is precisely the regime of transparency and discipline in which we are accustomed to working together with these organizations. Sometimes they arrange the exchange of information with other partner banks. We often receive guests from Russian, Central Asian and other banks, and our specialists pay reciprocal visit to these financial structures. We are in a constant learning process, and the EBRD and ADB provide this exchange of experience.

– Does Ameriabank plan to somehow expand its influence to other countries?

– We have never hidden our ambitions to enter the Russian and Georgian markets. There were real attempts, but, unfortunately or fortunately, they were not crowned with success, and we concentrated our forces in Armenia. And it worked – we have been leading in the corporate sector for many years holding now almost a third of the market here. Now we are actually the leader in the SMEs and retail segments. It should be noted that Armenia’s market opportunities are very limited. On the other hand, our country’s economy is less volatile and more predictable in the medium and long terms. However, nothing can be ruled out. After the consolidation in the Armenian banking sector is over, over in our favor, we will be able to redistribute our resources and begin foreign expansion. We will probably return to this issue soon.

– In Russia, banks often enter other markets, including non-banking ones. Does Ameriabank move in this direction?

– We are a financial organization, and our competencies and strengths are concentrated in the financial sector. We now have no plans to try something else. Although theoretically, in one form or another, I do not rule out attempts to enter non-banking markets. But, again, we will not use our resources to create something that we have little knowledge of. There is a hypothetical synergy of financial and some non-financial organizations, say, telecoms. This is not necessarily a merger; there may be close cooperation. But for the present we are fighting for absolute leadership in the financial sector.

– What is the share of remote channels now? What is the prevailing trend among customers- visiting a bank branch or RBS?

– One third of all bank customers actively use our mobile application or internet banking. One part (25%) is very active, another part is active in controlling the status of their accounts, receiving references and so on. But this figure is growing very fast. In terms of using remote channels by legal entities there are still no good specialized solutions in Armenia. For large companies, this issue is not urgent, and a large number of small and medium businesses have real needs for RBS, and we need to meet them as quick as possible. -0-

168: No Armenians among passengers, crew of crashed Indonesian Lion Air flight JT610 – preliminary information

Category
Society

According to preliminary reports there were no Armenians – neither citizens nor ethnic – among the passengers or crew of the Indonesian plane that crashed shortly after takeoff in Jakarta on October 29, foreign ministry spokesperson Anna Naghdalyan told ARMENPRESS.

An aircraft with 189 people on board has crashed into the sea off Indonesia’s island of Java on Monday, shortly after takeoff from the capital on its way to the country’s tin-mining hub, Reuters reported citing local officials.

A spokesman for Indonesia’s search and rescue agency said the Lion Air flight, JT610, lost contact 13 minutes after takeoff, adding that a tug boat leaving the capital’s port had seen the craft falling.

“It has been confirmed that it has crashed,” the spokesman, Yusuf Latif, said by text message, when asked about the fate of the plane, which air tracking service Flightradar 24 identified as a Boeing 737 MAX 8.

Its pilot and co-pilot had together amassed 11,000 hours of flying time, Lion Air said in a statement.

Manufacturer Boeing is aware of the airplane accident reports and is “closely monitoring” the situation, its spokesman told Reuters.

Sports: Arsenal: Forgotten Henrikh Mkhitaryan digging his own grave

Pain in the Arsenal
Oct 27 2018
 
 
Arsenal: Forgotten Henrikh Mkhitaryan digging his own grave
 
by Josh Sippie2 days ago Follow @sippenator101TWEETSHARExCOMMENT
 
Arsenal came out the big winners when they swapped Alexis for Henrikh Mkhitaryan, so why is the Armenian digging his own grave now?
 
Fans were over the moon when Arsenal managed to swap out a disgruntled and petulant Alexis Sanchez for Henrikh Mkhitaryan, whose exploits with Borussia Dortmund were enough to stave off any misgivings of how things were going in the dumpster fire at Manchester United.
 
And it paid dividends pretty early, with Mkhitaryan firing off to a quick start, exceeding Alexis’s production at his own new digs. When Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang arrived, it was serendipitous. The two had a fantastic rapport together and now it was going to come back, just across the English Channel.
 
Mkhitaryan rounded out the Fab Four that included Lacazette, Aubameyang and Ozil, all of whom figured to power this team into the new era.
 
Only that isn’t exactly how it’s worked out. Since the new season began, Mkhitaryan has had literally only 20 minutes of top-tier play, and that was in a brief 20 minute clip against Chelsea. Everything on either side of that 20 minutes has been unremarkable and, at times, even detrimental.
 
Leicester City was his first big chance since returning from injury and, despite the fluidity of the attack that centered on Mesut Ozil, Mkhitaryan wasn’t able to put together much and ended up making way before the hour mark, which is when things really started to get fun.
 
Still, against Leicester, Mkhitaryan could have given himself the boost he needed if he wouldn’t have scuffed a premium goal opportunity. So much of Mkhitaryan’s game, as with many others, is confidence, and he hasn’t had it this year. The injuries haven’t helped.
 
The problem for Mkhitaryan is that so many other players are stepping up in his stead. He is falling down the pecking order incredibly quickly, and it’s fathomable to think that he now sits behind Alex Iwobi, with Danny Welbeck also on the rise if the Armenian can’t sort himself out.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Bolton warned Armenia against possible military involvement in the Syrian crisis

Arminfo, Armenia
Oct 25 2018
Bolton warned Armenia against possible military involvement in the Syrian crisis

Yerevan October 25

Marianna Mkrtchyan. The issue of sending byArmenia a humanitarian mission to Syria was raised by Adviser to the US President on National Security John Bolton during a meeting with the President of the Republic of Armenia and Armenian parliamentarians.

Thus, on October 25 in Yerevan, referring to the decision of the Armenian authorities to send a humanitarian mission to Syria, Bolton in particular, said: “We, the United States also provide humanitarian assistance to Syria. And this should not affect political relationsAnd a large-scale humanitarian mission is being carried out there, “he said.

At the same time, Bolton stated that the Armenian President assured him that this was only a humanitarian mission and that it would not have a military orientation. “At the moment, for any country or side, it will be wrong to have military involvement, as there are already 7-8 fighting countries today. And I think that it’s wrong to involve other countries,” Bolton concluded.

To recall, the matter concerns sending to Syria a unit consisting of about 100 military specialists – doctors, engineers and personnel to ensure their safety. The time of dispatch depends on the completion of the preparation of the legal base for deployment and technical assistance.

Earlier, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said that Armenia and Russia will soon carry out a joint humanitarian program in Syria. He added that this would be a completely humanitarian program that would not include any military component. Later it became known about sending Armenian sappers and military medics to Syria to participate in a joint humanitarian operation with Russia.

We need to make economic ties in accordance with high level of political relations – Pashinyan to Lebanese President (photos)

Categories
Official
Politics
Region

Acting Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan today arrived in Lebanon on a working visit.

Following the welcoming ceremony the acting PM’s delegation departed to the Lebanese presidential palace where he met with President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri.

Pashinyan thanked the Lebanese President for the warm reception, stating that he is very happy for the visit to the brotherly country Lebanon. “Thank you for your participation in the La Francophonie summit in Yerevan just a week ago and for delivering a very comprehensive speech at the event. A month ago we had a chance to exchange views in New York over the bilateral relations between Armenia and Lebanon. Now as well we have a new opportunity for dialogue. Following Armenia’s independence in 1991 the relations of our countries, the centuries-old connections of our peoples have got new quality which is typical to two friendly states and brotherly peoples. We need to serve this at best for the strengthening of our partnership, implementation of our common goals”, the Armenian acting PM said.

In his turn the Lebanese President welcomed Pashinyan’s visit to the country, stating that it will contribute to further developing and strengthening the traditional friendly ties between the two countries. President Michel Aoun congratulated Nikol Pashinyan for the high-level organization of the 17th La Francophonie summit in Yerevan.

During the meeting the officials stated that there is a high-level political dialogue between the two countries which is conditioned by the historical friendly ties and the key role of the Lebanese-Armenian community. Nikol Pashinyan said the Armenian people remember with gratitude the warm attitude of the Lebanese people towards our compatriots who survived the Genocide: “Lebanon is the only country in the region that officially recognized the Armenian Genocide, and this is important not only for the preservation of historical memory, but also for the prevention of new genocides”.

The Lebanese President highly valued the role of the Armenian community in the country’s political, economic, social, cultural, educational and sports life, as well as the intensification of friendship between the two countries and peoples.

The officials also touched upon the opportunities to develop the bilateral commercial ties and attached importance to the active work on this path. “We need to take action to make the bilateral economic ties in accordance with the high-level political and human relations between our countries”, Nikol Pashinyan said. He also introduced the Armenian government’s actions in fight against corruption, simplification of tax and customs procedures, formation of favorable investment environment. The Lebanese President expressed readiness to assist the governments of the two countries in the implementation of programs and initiatives.

Nikol Pashinyan welcomed Lebanon’s initiative to establish a “Human Academy”, which was announced by President Michel Aoun during the UN General Assembly in New York on September 21, 2017. “Armenia welcomes Lebanon’s initiative to become a center of dialogue between various civilizations, religions and races and is ready to assist. We are confident that Lebanon’s efforts and experience aimed at the peaceful coexistence of different religions and nations can be instructive for not only separate countries, but also the entire region”, Pashinyan said.

At the end of the meeting the Armenian acting PM left a note at the Honorary Guest Book.

Statement of the President of the Venice Commission regarding Armenia

Categories
Politics
World

Scuola Grande di San Giovanni Evangelista, Venice – The President of the Venice Commission:

“Following the discussions between the Venice Commission and the First Deputy Prime Minister of Armenia at the 116th session of the Venice Commission

Acknowledges and supports the peaceful manner in which the Armenian people is carrying out change;

Acknowledges the specific situation in Armenia, which requires the holding of early elections;

Welcomes the commitment of the Armenian authorities to abide by international standards when revising the Electoral Code;

Notes that the proposed amendments pursue legitimate aims and seem mostly positive;

Welcomes in particular all steps taken to facilitate the exercise of the right to vote, to extend access to media, the rights of observers and more generally the transparency of the electoral process, as well as to struggle against electoral fraud;

Welcomes the abolition of restrictions on the number of participants in coalitions to be formed after the first round, in conformity with a key recommendation of the Venice Commission and ODIHR;

Welcomes the implementation of other recommendations of the Venice Commission and ODIHR, concerning in particular:

– The reduction of the electoral thresholds and thresholds applied for returning electoral deposits; the reduction of the amount of deposits;
– The reduction of deadlines for the accreditation of observers and media representatives, as well as the suppression of obstacles to the work of observers, such as the possibility to limit their number;
– Guarantees to ensure free vote by the military.

Recalls the reservations of the Venice Commission with respect to major changes in the electoral system, such as the abolition of district lists, within the year preceding the elections;

Notes that these reservations are less relevant if there is consensus among political forces about the change.”

168: No enemies, insiders or outsiders in new times, Pashinyan says regarding appointment of police general as governor

Category
Politics

There won’t be any issue of enemies, outsiders or insiders in the new times, acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan told reporters today.

The acting PM was visiting the charitable Breath Of Syrian-Armenian Culture in Yerevan trade fair and was asked by reporters to comment on the appointment of Hunan Poghosyan as the new Governor of Syunik. Poghosyan is a police general who served as Armenia’s deputy police chief during the Serzh Sargsyan administration.

“We are entering a new phase. I’ve said numerously – there is a time to build barricades, and there is a time to dismantle barricades. We have now entered the phase of dismantling barricades. It’s not about the person of Hunan Poghosyan, it’s about a political message. The message is that we are not going to divide into enemies, [outsiders] and [insiders]. There are no flawless people in Armenia. I can’t recall any appointment which didn’t result in [comments]. In one case they were saying he is too young, in another case they said he is too tall, the third…..I say again, there are no flawless people, flawless appointments don’t happen. The issue is the following – we must make a clear message that we are planning to unite the entire potential,” Pashinyan said.

He noted that there is a lot of talk about the actions of officials. He said that everyone will be held to account for their actions. “Doesn’t matter if they are officials or not. The times when being an official meant privilege are long gone,” Pashinyan said.