Sur le dossier turc, Ari Vatanen double ses amis de l’UMP

Le Monde, France
mercredi 1 Décembre 2004

Sur le dossier turc, Ari Vatanen double ses amis de l’UMP

A 8 heures par e-mail, recevez la Check-list, votre quotidien du
matin. Abonnez-vous au Monde.fr

Bruxelles de notre bureau européen

Les eurodéputés de l’UMP étaient fous de rage, mardi 30 novembre, à
l’issue d’un vote du Parlement européen sur la Turquie. Alors qu’ils
sont contre l’adhésion de ce pays à l’Union, et que Jacques Toubon
négocie depuis des mois avec les Allemands de la CDU le soutien de
ces derniers à la solution d’un “partenariat privilégié”, ils ont
exprimé un point de vue radicalement opposé, en commission des
affaires étrangères, en laissant Ari Vatanen parler et voter en leur
nom.

Le champion automobile finlandais, investi par l’UMP comme second de
liste dans le Grand Sud-Est aux élections européennes, a toujours été
favorable à l’intégration de ce pays musulman dans l’UE. Il considère
qu’elle “empêchera des conflits de civilisations” et qu’elle rendra
possible “la paix mondiale”. “J’ai voté selon ma conscience”, a-t-il
affirmé à l’issue du scrutin. Les Français de l’UMP ont pourtant tout
fait pour dissuader M. Vatanen de voter. Margie Sudre, la présidente
de la délégation, l’a prié de ne pas assister à la réunion de la
commission des affaires étrangères, dont il est titulaire. Elle lui a
demandé de laisser sa place à sa suppléante, Nicole Fontaine,
ancienne présidente du Parlement européen, qui aurait alors eu le
droit de voter. M. Vatanen a refusé.

Mme Sudre lui a alors demandé de tenir compte, “au moins, des
positions du président de la République”, Jacques Chirac, et de
“s’abstenir sur l’ensemble du texte”. En vain. Mardi midi, Françoise
Grossetête, ancienne chef de file de la liste UMP du Grand Sud-Est, a
envoyé un de ses assistants dans un restaurant où M. Vatanen
mangeait, lui rappeler “à qui il – devait – son investiture”, et lui
réclamer une certaine loyauté.

La délégation française de l’UMP devait se réunir mercredi 1er
décembre pour discuter d'”éventuelles sanctions” à l’encontre de M.
Vatanen. Celui-ci restait serein : “J’ai voté un amendement de M.
Toubon qui demande que la Turquie reconnaisse le génocide arménien
!”, précisait-il. “Sur le reste, comment pourrait-on me sanctionner,
alors que j’ai `uvré à la paix mondiale ?”, demandait-il.

Rafaële Rivais

A Child Shall Lead Them On The Organ

Hartford Courant , CT
Nov 27 2004

A Child Shall Lead Them On The Organ
At Armenian Church In New Britain, Next Generation Plays A Key Role

November 27, 2004
By DON STACOM, Courant Staff Writer

NEW BRITAIN — It is a tale shared by so many old, ethnic churches
entrenched in Northeast cities: The pews are getting a bit emptier,
the parishioners a bit more elderly.

As the first-wave immigrants who once clustered together in
tight-knit neighborhoods die off, their children – or grandchildren –
move on. And the churches that had been vibrant centers of worship,
culture and social life begin to fade, their vitality sapped.

In the heart of downtown, the 100 or so dues-paying members of St.
Stephen’s Armenian Apostolic Church are committed to keeping the
oldest Armenian church in Connecticut alive and well. And they
believe they have in their midst someone who will strengthen their
link to the next generation. His name is Vahe Hovhannisyan, and in
March he will be 10.

“Vahe is a gift to us from God,” said Father Krikor Keshishian,
priest at St. Stephen’s. “He loves his music, and he loves his
church.”

Vahe captured the congregation’s attention last summer when longtime
church organist Shirley Kevorkian announced she was tiring of her
duties.

“I thought we would have to start playing recorded music on CDs; I
didn’t know what we could do,” Keshishian recalled. “Vahe came up to
me and said `I’ll play.'”

And now the shy 9-year-old – who has never formally studied music –
is St. Stephen’s organist. For 21/2 hours every Sunday morning, Vahe
accompanies the choir and deacon for the liturgical service.

Vahe plays a keyboard at home, and takes music classes twice a week
with his fourth-grade class at Griswold School in Berlin. But he has
never formally studied music or gotten professional lessons. He
practices at the church every weekday afternoon, and recently learned
the music for the funeral and wedding ceremonies.

“You’re just overwhelmed that this little boy would take over playing
the organ, and that he would want so badly to do it,” said Lila
Winters, 75, a lifelong member of St. Stephen’s.

>>From the pews, the diminutive boy can hardly be seen behind the
31/2-foot-high Conn organ. First-time visitors to the church
occasionally ask who played the music, and are astonished when
Keshishian points to the boy.

“He’s the future generation. He just enriches everybody in the
parish,” Winters said.

“When he plays, you look at the older parishioners and they’ve all
got smiles on their faces,” said George Rustigian, former chairman of
the church’s trustees. “He’s probably doing as much for the elderly
as for the youth.”

There is no doubt that St. Stephen’s seeks more youth. Some second-
and third-generation parishioners remain, of course, but others have
drifted off, drawn to more comfortable homes in distant suburbs, or
to jobs in the Sunbelt, or perhaps simply away from the church that
bound their parents and grandparents so closely.

St. Stephen’s parishioners have seen that cycle play out just a few
blocks away. All Saints Church on Wilcox Street served the city’s
once-thriving Slovak community for 84 years, but faltered in the
later decades and closed in 2002.

“We’re hanging on, sometimes by a string,” said Winters. “Some people
are so old, they don’t come because they can’t make the stairs. We
have a banquet every year with more than 150 people. If they’d come
to church every week, we’d be fine.”

Out of perhaps 100 dues-paying members at St. Stephen’s now, more
than a third live in the city and many attend services sporadically.

“Maybe we have 50 people one week, then the next Sunday we’ll get
10,” Rustigian said. “It’s very difficult if just the parents and
grandparents support the church. We need the younger Armenians.”

Life was once very different at the church on Tremont Street.

“Fifty years ago, there were probably 30 to 40 Armenian families in a
six-block vicinity of the church. Between North Street and Allen
Street, there were Armenian tailors and jewelers and shops,”
Rustigian said.

“I was born near there, and it was one big happy Armenian family,”
Winters recalled.

“My grandfather and grandmother lived on the first floor of the
building, we lived on the second floor, my aunt and uncle were on the
third, and another aunt and uncle were across the street,” said
Winters, who now lives in Plainville.

“That’s way back. Like they say, `the good old days.’ I know you
can’t backtrack,” she said. “But with Vahe, we think maybe he will
encourage more younger people to come to the church. Hopefully that
generation will see that he’s playing and they’ll want to come.”

Kevorkian is one of the last members of the original community. Her
parents were founders of the church in 1925, and she still lives just
across Tremont Street.

“I was practically raised in the church. It’s like a second home to
all of us,” she said. “Everything runs around it, all our functions.”

She played St. Stephen’s organ for 60 years, and this year was ready
to stop.

“You become very popular, everyone knows me and every little thing
about me. But you get tired,” she said.

Vahe, who has listened to classical music since he was a toddler,
volunteered to take her place. Keshishian was skeptical, but said the
boy won him over with a relentless determination to learn the music.

“When you love something, you do it. And I know the boy loves music,”
Kevorkian said. “He’s only at the beginning stages. He’ll be very
good when he’s really into it.”

Tigran and Sophia Hovhannisyan brought their son, Vahe, and daughter,
Annie, to the United States from Armenia eight years ago. They are
precisely the sort of young family that St. Stephen’s seeks: Devoted
to the church, and eager to keep up their cultural heritage.

“I tell my son, `Feel very proud. Armenians are the first nationality
that accepted Christianity, we were the first to see the light in
Christianity,” Tigran Hovhannisyan said. “We try to transfer the
traditions to the next generation, and keep them always with the
religion.”

Vahe is a Boy Scout, swims at the YMCA and plays soccer and
basketball; but every afternoon he goes to St. Stephen’s to practice.
At his home in Kensington, he listens to Strauss, Verdi and
Beethoven, and plays on a Yamaha keyboard in the living room.

Asked about his music, he is almost bashful, and says quietly, “I
think I wanted to play the piano when I was 3.”

What is his favorite piece in the liturgy? Vahe replied by walking to
the Yamaha to play Amen Hayr Soorp, or Amen Holy Father.

“I like the melody,” Yahe said simply. “I just like to play it.”

Keshishian patted him on the head, and said: “We are all proud of
Vahe. He’s very awake for a 9-year-old boy. What was I doing when I
was 9? I don’t remember. But he is playing the entire divine
liturgy.”

Tbilisi: At crossroads, Georgia faces dueling interests

At crossroads, Georgia faces dueling interests
By M. Alkahzashvili

The Messenger, Georgia
Nov 26 2004

Thanks to its geographic location, Georgia is actively involved in
various transit-energy projects. But in addition to certain benefits,
the projects bring complications as well. Neighbors, both near and
far have their own interests in projects and their interests are
often unpredictable.

Most recently Azerbaijani media has expressed dissatisfaction over the
increase of Turkmenistan’s armed forces, an event also connected to
Georgia. The issue stems from the fact that the status of the Caspian
Sea remains vague, and Turkmenistan has put forward claims over oil
deposits in the sea that Azerbaijan has already begun to exploit.

A deputy to in Azerbaijan’s legislative assemble, the Mili-Mejlis,
was recently quoted by the Georgian newspaper Rezonansi as saying
Turkmenistan is taking an aggressive posture over the Caspian.

“The issues of the judicial regulation of the Caspian Sea are still
not completed. I think that Ashkhabad makes this move so it can be
more self-confident during negotiations and to defend its positions
regarding the Caspian Sea,” states deputy, and general, Vladimir
Timoshenko.

At the same time it is widely mentioned that Georgia contributes
in the increase of Turkmenistan’s armed forces. Between 1994-1995,
Georgia’s aviation factory Tbilaviamsheni began covering the costs of
importing natural gas from Turkmenistan by renovating the country’s
military airplanes. So far, 43 military planes and 6 helicopters
have been repaired. In addition to this Turkmenistan bought the SU-25
Scorpion fighter modernized by Tbilaviamsheni.

Azerbaijan is a key partner for Georgia, particular in its Caspian
energy projects. Thus Georgia has no interest in upsetting one of
its closest neighbors, friends and allies. Georgia hopes that the
tension between Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan will be solved without
any conflicts.

It is of no interest to any country in the region rich with energy
resources to further aggravate the situation. On the other hand Georgia
has its commercial interests in particular when Georgia has enormous
debts from natural gas to Turkmenistan.

Meanwhile, Russia’s RAO-UES has initiated a new transit project
through Georgia. Chair of the board of the local Telasi distributor
and member of the executive board of RAO-UES, Andrei Rappoport,
announced this week that his company is considering expansion into
the Iranian energy system.

To successfully implement the project, RAO-UES needs to build an
additional electric transmission line through Georgia. Negotiations
with the Iranian side are underway and as Rappoport said the project
will enable Georgia to better regulate its electricity supply system:
in case of a surplus, to export to Iran, and in case of a deficit,
to import from Iran.

But the question arises, since Russia is taking so much care of
Georgia, one can assume that this project as political background
as well. Here too diverse interests are at stake: Russia wants to
include its ally Armenia in the project and extend its reach further
to middle eastern markets.

MOSCOW: Presidents of Kazakhstan,Armenia & Uzbekistan congratulate Y

PRESIDENTS OF KAZAKHSTAN, ARMENIA AND UZBEKISTAN CONGRATULATE VIKTOR YANUKOVICH

RIA Novosti, Russia
Nov 25 2004

KIEV, November 25 (RIA Novosti) – President of Kazakhstan Nursultan
Nazarbayev has congratulated Viktor Yanukovich with his victory in
the Ukrainian presidential election, the Ukrainian government’s press
service informed the Novosti-Ukraina agency.

“I congratulate you with all my heart on your election to the highest
post in Ukraine. Your victory stands for the nation’s choice of unity,
democracy and economic progress,” the statement says.

The Kazakh head of state was echoed by his Armenian counterpart Robert
Kocharyan, the press service reported.

“I would like to congratulate you on this occasion. I hope Armenia
and Ukraine will continue developing and enhancing the relations of
friendship and mutual understanding for the good of our states and
nations,” the greeting says.

Uzbekistan’s President Islam Karimov followed suit.

“It is my strong conviction that your occupying the highest post will
secure Ukraine’s independence, enhance the country’s prestige on the
world arena and provide for the welfare and prosperity of the people
of Ukraine,” Karimov stated.

Catholics say EU must set conditions for Turkey

Catholics say EU must set conditions for Turkey
By Paul Taylor

BRUSSELS, Nov 19 (Reuters) – Roman Catholic bishops from across the
European Union questioned on Friday whether Turkey was ready to open
EU membership talks and said Brussels should set further human rights
conditions for starting negotiations.

The Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community (COMECE) said
there was no religious obstacle to the overwhelmingly Muslim nation
joining the EU, but Turkey must respect basic rights such as equality
for women and religious freedom.

“Therefore it must be asked whether it is appropriate to open
negotiations with Turkey, whilst fundamental rights including
religious freedom are not fully respected in that state,” they said
in a statement.

The prelates noted that the executive European Commission, in its
report on Turkey’s candidacy last month, had pointed to remaining
shortcomings but not linked the opening of talks to better respect
of those rights.

“The Bishops of COMECE propose that before negotiations… begin with
Turkey, the Turkish government is required to correct shortcomings
with regard to religious freedom and the legal status of minorities
according to the provisions of the Treaty of Lausanne 1923,” the
statement said.

They urged EU leaders to include this provision in their decision
at a summit on Dec. 17 on whether and when to open accession talks
with Turkey.

The bishops said the question of starting accession talks with Turkey
was political, not religious.

They rejected wording that would have questioned more fundamentally
whether the EU could admit Turkey.

An initial draft of the statement seen by Reuters said EU leaders
should question “whether the European Union is capable in the medium
term of absorbing such a large country with Turkey’s history and
geostrategic position.”

The Lausanne Treaty recognises Christian Greeks, Armenians and Jews
as minorities with official status in the country.

The treaty does not mention Kurds, Circassians, Arabs or non-Sunni
Alevis as minorities. Human rights groups say the definition should
be widened to include them, but the Turkish government opposes this.

The Roman Catholic church has historically supported European
integration. Bishop Anton Stres of Slovenia noted it had played a
role in mobilising the ‘yes’ vote in referendums on accession in the
10 mainly east European states which joined the EU on May 1.

Asked whether the church would campaign for a ‘yes’ to the EU
constitution despite its failure to obtain a mention of God or
Europe’s Christian heritage, the bishops said the charter enshrines a
permanent dialogue between churches and other religious institutions
and EU institutions.

“We can express ourselves in favour of the pursuit of European
unification,” Stres said.

11/19/04 16:10 ET

Armenia to allocate extra funds for police in 2005

Armenia to allocate extra funds for police in 2005

Arminfo
18 Nov 04

YEREVAN

The funds envisaged for law-enforcement agencies in the draft state
budget for 2005 are insufficient. However, taking into consideration
the difficult economic situation in the republic, one should be
thankful for the extra 2bn drams [3.98m dollars] allocated to
law-enforcement agencies in 2005, compared to the budget allocation in
2004, the chief of the Armenian Police, Lt-Gen Ayk Arutyunyan, said
during today’s interview with journalists after hearings on the draft
state budget. In line with the draft state budget for 2005, 11.6bn
drams [23m dollars] will be allocated to the police.

He said that 80 per cent of the extra 2bn drams would be spent on
increasing wages of police employees, as a result of which wages will
increase by 40 per cent. The salary of Armenian policemen is lower
today than that of other state employees, the police chief said.

But the Armenian government has already expressed its readiness to
grant extra funds for the needs of the Armenian police in 2005 if
necessary, Ayk Arutyunyan said.

Sur le referendum, il est trop tard pour avoir des regrets

La Croix, France
19 novembre 2004

Sur le référendum, il est trop tard pour avoir des regrets .

La porte-parole du Parti socialiste et députée de Paris, Annick
Lepetit, était l’invitée de l’émission Face aux chrétiens animée par
Jacques Paugam. Elle répondait aux questions d’Aymeric Pourbaix
(Radio-Notre-Dame), Rémy Nelson (RCF) et Marine Lamoureux (La Croix).

par LAMOUREUX Marine,PAUGAM Jacques,POURBAIX Aymeric,NELSON Rémy

Le référendum interne du PS sur la Constitution européenne aura lieu
le 1er décembre. Au vu des fortes oppositions au traité,
regrettez-vous d’avoir engagé une telle consultation ?

Annick Lepetit : Il est un peu tard pour avoir des regrets. Je crois
en outre qu’à partir du moment où les oppositions internes se
faisaient entendre, il fallait qu’il y ait un débat. On ne peut pas
se dire préoccupé par l’abstention, par le manque d’intérêt des
citoyens pour l’Europe, et blmer la tenue d’un tel débat, même s’il
peut donner lieu à quelques excès.

– Si le non l’emporte, le premier secrétaire François Hollande
devra-t-il démissionner ?

– Nous en discuterons, de manière collective. Mais il est évident que
si le non l’emportait, ce serait totalement contraire à la ligne
politique sur laquelle François Hollande a été élu. La direction mise
en place autour de lui ne pourrait plus diriger. Cependant, il ne
veut pas faire du résultat un enjeu personnel, car s’il mettait sa
démission en jeu, le débat ne porterait plus sur l’Europe mais sur
lui.

– Et si le oui l’emporte, Laurent Fabius pourra-t-il rester numéro
deux ?

– Cela me paraît difficile pour lui, comme pour d’autres d’ailleurs,
qui militent pour le non et assument des responsabilités au sein du
parti. Là encore, nous examinerons collectivement s’ils peuvent
continuer à exercer ces fonctions. Cela dit, la tenue d’un congrès
exceptionnel ne me paraît pas indispensable.

– Autre motif de division : l’adhésion de la Turquie à l’Union.
Quelle est aujourd’hui la position du PS ?

– Elle est simple : nous n’avons pas à tourner le dos à la Turquie.
Mais nous n’avons pas, non plus, à prendre de décision tout de suite,
car nous ne savons pas quel sera l’état de l’Europe dans dix ou
quinze ans. La vraie question, à mon avis, c’est la question
financière. L’UE, compte tenu de son budget, pourrait-elle supporter
le poids d’un pays aussi peuplé ? Aujourd’hui, non. Mais je n’oppose
pas un refus systématique.

– Les dés ne sont-ils pas pipés, à partir du moment où vous posez une
condition préalable, la reconnaissance du génocide arménien, que les
Turcs refusent ?

– Je ne suis pas d’accord avec vous. Il peut y avoir une évolution :
l’Europe est attractive, une majorité des Turcs tiennent à y entrer
et pour cela, je pense qu’ils sont prêts à aller plus loin qu’ils ne
l’ont fait jusqu’à présent.

– Le ministre de l’intérieur souhaite créer un diplôme d’Etat pour la
formation des imams. Qu’en pensez-vous ?

– Si j’en crois ses propos, cela se ferait à travers la création de
fondations. Le principe est intéressant, pour rétablir une relation
pacifiée entre l’Etat et les religions. Cela dit, il faut regarder de
près qui va les gérer. Quant au financement, notamment en provenance
de l’étranger, les fondations permettraient qu’il soit transparent.
En revanche, contrairement à Nicolas Sarkozy, je trouve qu’il serait
dangereux de remettre en cause la loi de 1905 sur la séparation de
l’Eglise et de l’Etat, qui nous a permis de vivre en bonne
intelligence jusqu’ici.

Balakian discusses genocide

Daily Trojan, University of Southern California
Nov 15 2004

Balakian discusses genocide

Best-selling Armenian author discussed the links between United
States, the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust.

By Danielle Datu and James R. Koren

Peter Balakian, author of the best-selling book “The Burning Tigris:
The Armenian Genocide and America’s Response,” spoke about the issues
presented in the book at Doheny Memorial Library Friday.

The event, sponsored by the USC Armenian Student Association, was
just one stop for Balakian on a two-month-long tour to promote his
book, which was released last September.

Balakian spoke not only about the Armenian Genocide but also about
its historical relevance to World War I, the United States and the
first discussions of international law.

“One of the things that I’m most focused on in my tour is the issue
of education and how this history, which has been left out of the
curriculum, which has been left out of the common carillons of
education, is now a moment to be reclaimed and rediscovered and put
in where it belongs in any teaching of the 20th century,” he said.

Balakian said the Young Turk government exploited World War I for the
purpose of genocide in the same way that Adolph Hitler’s Nazi Party
did in World War II.

He said that no history of the United States is complete without a
discussion of the genocide because the American relief effort for
Armenians was the first U.S. international human rights movement.

American icons such as Mark Twain, Henry Adams and Clara Barton spoke
and took action against the massacres.

“The New York Times alone in 1915 published 145 articles on the
Armenian massacres,” Balakian said.

Giving the event a greater global context, Balakian said the Armenian
Genocide led directly to the Holocaust because of the precedent it
set and because of close ties between Germany and Turkey.

“One of Adolph Hitler’s closest friends in the early period of the
Nazi Party witnessed dozens of deportations and massacres and wrote
back about that,” he said.

The genocide of 1915, which has not been officially acknowledged by
the Turkish government or by the United States, comprised the killing
of approximately 1.5 million Armenians by the Young Turk government.

The Turkish government disputes claims of genocide.

According to the Turkish Embassy’s Web site, approximately 600,000
Armenians were killed between 1912 and 1922, and they were killed
because of “violent political aims,” not because of their race or
religion.

The Web site also states that, in the same period, about 2.5 million
Muslims died. “The years 1912-1922 constitute a horrible period for
humanity, not just for Armenians,” the site said.

In a resolution passed in 1984, the House of Representatives called
the massacre of Armenians by the Young Turk government an act of
genocide, but the U.S. Senate has taken no such action.

In 1981, President Ronald Reagan used the word “genocide” to describe
the event, but no president since has done so.

Analysis: Azerbaijan Rejects Armenian Warning Over Karabakh Talks

Analysis: Azerbaijan Rejects Armenian Warning Over Karabakh Talks
By Liz Fuller

Radio Free Europe, Czech Republic
Nov 10 2004

In an exclusive interview on 9 November with RFE/RL’s Armenian
Service, Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian said that he and
his Azerbaijani counterpart Elmar Mammadyarov made “serious progress”
during their four rounds of talks on approaches to resolving the
Karabakh conflict. Oskanian said it is now possible to begin a
second stage of talks building on what was achieved earlier, and
that Azerbaijan has signaled its readiness for such talks. “Armenia
has already given its positive answer and is ready to resume the
negotiations [as early as] tomorrow,” Oskanian said.

Since May, Oskanian and Mammadyarov have met four times in Strasbourg
and Prague to discuss approaches to resolving the conflict. Whatever
provisional consensus they reached was the subject of discussion
at a meeting on 15 September between the two countries’ presidents,
Robert Kocharian and Ilham Aliyev, on the sidelines of a CIS summit in
Astana, after which Oskanian said there would be an “interval” before
the second stage of his talks with Mammadyarov began. Azerbaijani
Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov said in late September that the
past meetings with Oskanian had proved “useful” but that further such
talks had been postponed “indefinitely” at Armenia’s request.

No details have been divulged of the issues on the table in Prague,
and that enforced confidentiality has spawned rumors that Yerevan
is prepared to withdraw from either three or five of the seven
occupied Azerbaijani districts bordering on Karabakh even before
a final decision is reached on the future political status of the
unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.

On 27 October, the Armenian Foreign Ministry issued a formal statement
denying such speculation. “Regardless of Azerbaijan’s wishes or
statements, Armenia’s focus during negotiations is on the issue of
the status of Nagorno-Karabakh. All other issues are tangential to the
status issue, and Armenia views them only in the context of the future
status of Nagorno-Karabakh,” the statement said. It further underscored
that Yerevan “is interested only in a comprehensive resolution of this
issue, and its participation in negotiations is conditional on that
approach,” the statement continued. In other words, Armenia wants the
final agreement on a solution to the conflict to address, and stipulate
a solution to, all disputed issues, and to specify the order and time
frame in which the various points agreed upon will be implemented.

Also in his 9 November interview with RFE/RL’s Armenian Service,
Oskanian criticized as “a diplomatic error” Baku’s insistence on
including on the agenda of the UN General Assembly the issue of the
resettlement of Armenian families on territory controlled by Armenian
forces. He warned that Azerbaijan should not proceed on the assumption
that it can continue negotiations on resolving the Karabakh conflict
under the aegis of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group while at the same time seeking the assistance
of other international organizations in resolving individual issues
related to that conflict. Armenia wants the final agreement on a
solution to the conflict to address, and stipulate a solution to,
all disputed issues, and to specify the order and time frame in which
the various points agreed upon will be implemented.

“Either we continue the negotiations within the Minsk Group,
trying to reach a solution of the whole problem, or Azerbaijan
can take the issue to other instances, seeking separate solutions,”
Oskanian said. Should Azerbaijan choose the latter approach, Oskanian
said, the Azerbaijani authorities will have to negotiate with the
Nagorno-Karabakh leadership. “Today the ball is in [Azerbaijan’s]
court,” Oskanian concluded.

But on 10 November Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry spokesman Metin Mirza
rejected Oskanian’s warning that Azerbaijan should not try to launch
a parallel mediation effort as an effort to “torpedo” the negotiating
process at a juncture when “favorable conditions” had been created
for making progress. He inferred that Yerevan is “seriously concerned”
by the prospect of the UN General Assembly debate. And he stressed yet
again that Baku will not agree to negotiate with the Nagorno-Karabakh
leadership.

President Aliyev similarly argued last week that raising the Karabakh
issue in other international forums will not jeopardize the ongoing
search for a solution under the aegis of the OSCE Minsk Group,
nor does Baku seek to replace the Minsk Group by another mediator,
ITAR-TASS reported. Aliyev said Baku simply wants international
organizations such as the UN, the EU, and the Council of Europe
to “recognize unequivocally that Armenia has occupied part of
Azerbaijan’s territory,” and that this “unfair situation” should be
corrected. Touring four southern regions of Azerbaijan on 9 November,
President Aliyev said that Baku will not sign a formal Karabakh peace
agreement until Armenian forces have retreated from the districts
adjacent to Nagorno-Karabakh that they currently occupy, ITAR-TASS
reported. “We demand with justification that the seized territory be
freed and the occupying forces withdraw,” Aliyev said while visiting
Astara, where he formally opened a new cargo terminal on the border
with Iran.

McKinsey & Co. unveils findings of research on Armenian Tourism

MCKINSEY & CO UNVEILS FINDINGS OF A RESEARCH ON ARMENIAN TOURISM

ArmenPress
Nov 10 2004

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 10, ARMENPRESS: Funded by 2020 Project, McKinsey and
Co consulting agency is developing a project on prospects of tourism
development in Armenia. The agency is supported by the Armenian
ministry of economy and trade and AEPLAC.

Yesterday the head of McKinsey, Andreas Mershner, Moscow office
manager Avetik Chalabian and an adviser Nikolai Shikhvtsov unveiled
their findings in Armenia Mariot hotel. The presentation was attended
by representatives of respective agencies, travel agencies, public
and donor organizations.

According to Shikhovtsov, the rise in the number of tourists from
41,000 in 1999 to 206,000 in 2003 is very impressive. Some 30% of
increased tourist flow was connected with celebrations of Christianity
as a state religion in Armenia. However, this indicator is by three
times lower that Armenian used to have during the Soviet Union. In
the words of the adviser, a concerning fact is that only 15% of the
visitors are “true tourists.”

According to McKinsey research findings, only Yerevan is in the
position to provide proper facilities to international travelers.
Other regions of Armenia lack such. According to A. Chalabian, the
size of investment in tourism industry is not small but it should be
coordinated. Otherwise, they may yield short-term results.