Merci La France Or C’est La Vie

MERCI LA FRANCE OR C’EST LA VIE
Naira Hayrumyan

Story from Lragir.am News:

Published: 16:07:38 – 09/07/2012

Something strange happened in France relating to the law on the
criminalization of the Armenian genocide denial. First, the minister
of foreign affairs of France Laurent Fabius said that Hollande’s
government will not follow Sarkozy’s path regarding this issue. Since
his Turkish counterpart Ahmed Davutoglu also stated that Turkey removes
sanctions which it had approved, everyone thought France has discarded
the draft law.

Then rumors came that Hollande called the head of the Armenian
Coordination Council of ARFD France and said that the law will be
elaborated. The French Armenians have already expressed doubt that
Holland really telephoned him. The information office of the president
of France did not respond to this clearly but no one has officially
denied Fabius’ words and Davutoglu’s joy.

What is happening in France? What has Hollande planned? Even if we
assume that the French foreign minister made â~@~Kâ~@~Ka statement
which was contrary to the position of Hollande, the president would
have denied it publicly. It is clear that he would not be very pleased
to criticize his foreign minister for being incorrect but in this
case he found himself in an awkward situation.

Either the foreign minister failed to agree its statement with Hollande
or Hollande has changed his attitude to Turkey.

Apparently, Ankara is active e in the European direction and is likely
to push Europe on the issue of its membership to the EU. Hollande may
be a good supporter. It still needs to be found out what France will
get in exchange but Hollande’s support may be crucial for Turkey,
it is evident.

It is not accidental that on these days everyone is talking about
the need to open the Armenian-Turkish border which is one of the
obstacles to Turkey’s membership to EU. Davutoglu does not cease to
repeat that the border will open if Armenian troops are withdrawn
from the Karabakh regions. This means that if France, one of the OSCE
Minsk Group co-chairs, insists on the withdrawal of troops from at
least one region, Turkey will open its border with Armenia as well
as Turkey’s way to Europe.

This is a good plan but it is completely Turkish. What will it bring
to France, to say nothing about Armenia, which will definitely lose
some territory?

Tomorrow the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group will cross the demined
border between Azerbaijan and Karabakh. Perhaps, right in the place
which will be proposed by the mediators to be returned.

The OSCE Secretary General Lamberto Zannier is in Azerbaijan. He
has stated that the OSCE considers the current status quo of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict unacceptable and calls on Armenia and
Azerbaijan to refrain from the use of force in resolving the conflict.

“The more players are involved in the conflict settlement process,
the greater will be opportunities for advancement,” said the OSCE
Secretary General, without indicating what he has in mind.

After his election Francois Hollande’s has already made some steps to
eliminate certain stereotypes. he openly stated that Asad will have to
leave, he was the only person to argue with Angela Merkel and achieved
corrections to the economic policy. Now, he may end the traditionally
negative attitude of Europe to Turkey and resolve the Karabakh issue.

And the answer to the dissatisfied Armenians will be c’est la vie.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments26794.html

Istanbul: A Fair Assessment Of Turkey’s Foreign Policy

A FAIR ASSESSMENT OF TURKEY’S FOREIGN POLICY

Today’s Zaman
July 8 2012
Turkey

For various reasons, but mainly due to the Syrian crisis, Ankara’s
foreign policy is being questioned both inside the country and abroad.

Some of the criticisms are fair and justified, while others are not.

There is no doubt that Ankara’s claim (in Foreign Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu’s words) to “lead the wave of change” in the Middle East is
beyond its means. The Justice and Development Party (AKP) government’s
“zero problems with neighbors” policy, based on “soft power” — on
the principles of solving problems with neighbors by dialogue and
diplomacy and by promoting economic interdependence avoiding threats
or use of military force — has substantially contributed to Turkey’s
security, economic growth and international prestige. It has, however,
met with increasing difficulties in the wake of the Arab Awakening,
which has brought about perhaps as radical a context change for
Turkey’s foreign policy as the end of the Cold War.

Ankara is currently engaged in developing a new foreign policy
paradigm that apparently aims to “steer and lead the wave of change”
in the Middle East toward peace and democracy. To judge by Davutoglu’s
recent statement following the downing of a Turkish military plane by
Syria, the new policy will rely on “smart power.” If this means that
Turkey is going to resort to threats or use of force as an instrument
of foreign policy, it deserves all the warnings about the risks that
would entail, not only to the democratization and civilianization of
the regime in Turkey, but also to the socioeconomic development of the
country. Ankara can and should take part in international diplomatic
efforts to promote peace and democratization in its region but should
not for a moment consider using military force to “steer and lead
the wave of change” in the Middle East.

The criticisms directed towards Ankara’s Cyprus policy since
the rejection by the Greek Cypriots of the Annan plan for the
reunification of the island are also fair and justified. Ankara could
have extended the customs union to southern Cyprus as required by its
legal commitments to the EU, and even withdrawn part of its military
presence on the island in line with the once-pursued policy of being
one step ahead in efforts to unify the island. The unresolved Cyprus
problem is blocking Turkey’s accession to the EU while leading to new
tensions concerning the exploitation of natural gas reserves located
in the island’s waters.

There are, however, unfair and unjustified criticisms of Turkish
foreign policy under the AKP government. It is said that a few years
ago Turkey was in a position to facilitate peace negotiations between
Israel and Syria, whereas now relations are tense with both sides.

Well, didn’t Israel itself massacre the Palestinians in Gaza and
undermine any hopes for peace negotiations? Isn’t the current Israeli
government pursuing the policy of occupation and subjugation of the
Palestinians against nearly the entire world? Why would it be wrong
for Turkey to oppose an unscrupulous policy that endangers peace and
stability in the entire region?

Syrian people have risen against a cruel dictatorship that has so far
massacred nearly 14,000 of its citizens and forced nearly 200,000
of them to flee the country. What is wrong with Ankara providing
diplomatic support to the Syrian people against a dictator who has
rejected all calls for reform and lost all legitimacy?

Ankara is also criticized often for not implementing the protocols
signed with Armenia in 2009. Well, isn’t Armenia continuing to occupy
a fifth of Azerbaijan and forcing close to a million Azeris to remain
refugees in their own country? Isn’t Ankara justified in not moving
forward to establish diplomatic ties and open borders, since Yerevan
refuses to take a single step towards reconciliation with Azerbaijan?

It is claimed, most recently by the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad,
that Ankara is pursuing a policy of “sectarianism,” supporting
Sunni groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and others while
discriminating against the Shia or non-Sunnis. Against this claim
one needs perhaps only to raise the following questions: Isn’t Tehran
itself attaching much value to its dialogue with Ankara? Wasn’t Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan the first Sunni leader ever to visit
the shrine of Prophet Ali in Najaf, the religious capital of the Shia?

Hasn’t Ankara a continuing dialogue with Iraqi Shia leaders Ayad
Allawi and Muqtada al-Sadr, while tensions with Baghdad have arisen
due to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s efforts to monopolize power?

The differences between Ankara and Tehran are based not on the
religious identities of its leaders but on the political models they
represent for the region.

And what about the claim that Ankara is pursuing a policy of
neo-Ottomanism? Ankara is surely trying to reconnect with regions
and countries with which it has historical and cultural ties. To
assess these efforts as signs of hegemonistic motives does not make
the slightest sense.

BAKU: Skirmish Occurs In Contact Line Of Azerbaijani And Armenian Tr

SKIRMISH OCCURS IN CONTACT LINE OF AZERBAIJANI AND ARMENIAN TROOPS, TWO AZERBAIJANI SOLDIERS WOUNDED

APA
July 9 2012
Azerbaijan

One Armenian soldier dies, four were wounded as a result of the
skirmish

Baku. Hafiz Heydarov – APA. A skirmish occurred in the contact line
of Azerbaijani and Armenian troops. APA reports that the incident was
recorded in Agstafa front. One Armenian soldier died, four soldiers
were wounded as a result of intensive skirmish occurred between the
sides. Armenian Defense Ministry confirmed the fact to the press.

Spokesman for the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry, Colonel Eldar Sahiboglu
told APA that two soldiers of the Azerbaijani Army – Jalal Aliyev
and Urfan Valiyev were wounded as a result of the skirmish.

The wounded soldiers were hospitalized, their state is reported
serious.

Istanbul: A Village Beyond The Euphrates: Yuvacalä±

A VILLAGE BEYOND THE EUPHRATES: YUVACALı

Today’s Zaman
July 8 2012
Turkey

The sun was sinking fast behind us as we skirted the massive, brooding
hump of an ancient settlement mound, dark evening shadows slipping
inexorably between the pale, neat rows of recently harvested wheat
at its feet.

In the distance, beyond a sprawling patchwork-quilt of sun-bleached
fields criss-crossed by meandering dirt roads, a line of purpling
mountains blocked the northern horizon. Swifts wheeled endlessly in
the dusky skies above in search of airborne insects, whilst floating
down from the upper reaches of the mound came the distinctive,
liquid trill of bee-eaters, nesting in tunnels they had bored into
the detritus of many millennia of human occupation.

A rural experience

“So where are they?” I queried our guide, Fatih. “Over there” he
pointed for the third time in good-natured exasperation. “That’s
wheat isn’t it?” I countered, following the line of his finger to a
stubble-field dotted with low stacks of some reaped crop or other.

“Come on then, I’ll show you,” he sighed. Leaving the line of ancient
walling — Roman or even earlier — tracing its way around the foot
of the mound, we dutifully trailed in his wake across a rare stretch
of uncultivated, sun-crazed earth to the field in question. My fellow
guests must have wondered what the detour was all about until Fatih
stooped down, picked-up a handful of what looked like straw and
shook it into his hand. Then, his dark, youthful face grinning in
mock-triumph, as he displayed a few dusty yet smooth, reddish-orange
pellets. “What are they?” asked Willow peering, curious now, into
Fatih’s cupped hand. But before he could get his words out she
exclaimed excitedly, “Wow, they’re lentils!”

Few people — let’s make that nobody — would go on a holiday, no
matter how specialist, to see a lentil. But if, like me, you’ve eaten
millions of them in your lifetime but never seen them growing, it’s
an experience. So this is what lentil plants look like, this is the
kind of place they grow. And perhaps most importantly of all, perhaps,
you learn that Fatih’s fellow villagers are the kind of people who
cultivate what is one of nature’s most versatile and important crops.

A plant, what’s more, that derives from the wild lentils that grew in
abundance on the surrounding plateau and were “harvested” hereabouts
by our hunter-gatherer ancestors following the retreat of the last
ice-age around 12,000 years ago. That’s what a visit to Yuvacalı,
an ethnically-Kurdish village just across the Euphrates in southeast
Turkey, is all about. Experiences. Of the kind you just don’t get on
the average trip.

Starry skies, fat-tailed sheep and helping hands

Perhaps one day, if an archeological team is let loose on the 20 meter
or so high settlement mound dominating the small village clustered
around its skirt, and they come up with anything half as exciting as
the unique Neolithic temple complex at nearby Göbeklitepe, visitors
may come here to see a fascinating prehistoric site. For the moment,
though, they are drawn to this small rural community, a few kilometers
outside the town of Hilvan, by the opportunity to spend some time in
a “typical” Kurdish village, eat with a local family, sleep under a
star-spangled sky on the flat-roof of a village house, try their hand
at milking the family’s fat-tailed sheep (a lot more difficult than
it looks, as those of my fellow guests who tried it for the first time
found out!) or learning the deceptively tricky art of making tray-sized
discs of that most essential of village foods, nan (lavaÅ~_) bread.

They come also to put, in the least invasive and most responsible of
ways, a few of the billions of dollars Turkey earns annually from
tourism directly into the hands of the people who need it most —
hard-working but invariably poor villagers. For Yuvacalı is the focus
of a responsible tourism project begun by village born and bred Omer
Tanık and his English wife Alison, both resident here. The families
who host visitors get to keep all of the proceeds — nothing is
creamed off for administrative costs or commission. The same goes for
the money earned by the drivers who take some visitors further afield
on tours run by well-regarded Nomad Tours, also set-up by the couple.

All guests are politely requested to make a donation, no matter how
small, either in cash or kind, to the project. Donations have already
helped establish a pre-school in Yuvacalı, help supply books and
other equipment to the school, plant trees and distribute free tooth
brushes and paste to local schools.

A prophet, a path and a birthday

Continuing our sunset sojourn with the charming Fatih, we came to what
looked like a basalt boulder field at the eastern end of the mound.

According to our guide this used to be an Armenian village, the lines
of weather-worn boulders the first course of the walls of what were
once predominantly mud-brick houses. Yuvacalı means “nesting place,”
the Turkish translation of the Kurdish name for the village, Hellun,
and was called such because the Kurds “nested” in the Armenians’
houses following their unfortunate departure in 1915. Beyond the
abandoned village the tinkle of bells alerted us to a mixed flock
of fat-tailed sheep and goats being driven to a watering-hole and,
arriving at the same spot from the opposite direction, a herd of cows.

It was a biblical scene, an image reinforced when Fatih proudly led
us to the start of Abraham’s Path, a Harvard-sponsored, way-marked
walking trail that begins in Yuvacalı and runs all the way to Harran,
south of Urfa, where the Old Testament prophet is reputed to have
spent several years. Despite his tender years, Fatih is the official
homestay co-ordinator for the Abraham’s path project. He also painted
many of the neat red and white flashes on the rocks lining the route
and, with his fast-improving English, works as a guide on the trail.

My fellow guests were an adventurous young American couple, Dave and
Willow, who’d arrived here by way of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia,
and a couple of intrepid Australian girls not yet out of their teens,
Ashley and Sasha who, having spent much of the winter freezing their
toes off in a remote yurt in Mongolia, were totally unfazed by life
in a traditional Kurdish village. We sat cross-legged with our host
family on the floor of their verandah, tearing-off generous hunks of
home-cooked lahmacun, which we ate accompanied by refreshing bowls of
iced cacık (cucumber and yoghurt) prepared by Pero, the ever-smiling
wife of the head of the household, Halil.

It was Willow’s birthday, and at the end of the meal, Fatih emerged
with a sticky-cake in her honor. Faruk, his younger brother, blew
up some balloons, which the “baby” of the family, 11 year old Aylin,
enjoyed batting around with her new foreign playmates, and we all sang
“Happy Birthday” in a mangled mix of Turkish and English. The need
for a pre-school in the village became evident when Fatih explained
after dinner that he hadn’t learned Turkish until he was seven years
old, his father was barely literate, and his mother not able to read
and write at all because she’d never attended school. Although I was
able to have simple conversations with Halil and Pero in Turkish,
the family spoke amongst themselves in their native Kurdish.

A timeless landscape

That night, whilst our hosts slept en famille on one big bed, raised
on metal stilts and covered with a mosquito net, we visitors were
placed in separate corners on the roof of the house, sleeping on
thick quilts rolled out beneath an insect-proof net. I woke soon after
dawn and slipped from my canopy to emerge into the soft, warm light
of a Yuvacalı morning, leaving my fellow guests sleeping with the
(compared to me at least) innocence of youth.

Soon, coiling my way up the settlement mound I caught the occasional
iridescent flash of a bee-eater over head, whilst at my feet columns
of ants were already toiling their way across a slope liberally
littered with fragments of pottery left by the successive groups
of people who had made this place their home. From the top I looked
out over the wide-sweep of the plateau and the seemingly haphazard
juxtaposition of fields of wheat, lentils and chickpeas. This is a
timeless landscape, a region where man first learned to cultivate,
as opposed to merely gather, the kind of crops spread out in the
fields below me — a revolution in the development of our species.

In its own small but caring way the Yuvacalı project is a revolution
as well, bringing the right kind of tourism to an oft-neglected region
where small bucks really can make a difference to ordinary people’s
lives. It’s very beautiful and welcoming, too.

QUICK INFO

For details on how to visit or make a donation to the Yuvacali
homestay project check-out , email or ring
+90533 747 1850. Nomad Tours also run half-day tours to local villages
and sites, full-day tours further afield to Urfa, Harran, Mt. Nemrut,
Göbeklitepe and Diyarbakır, plus four-day tours further afield in
southeast Turkey — and even trips into Iraqi Kurdistan.

For more on Abraham’s path, projected to extend across into neighboring
Syria and beyond, see

To get here from Urfa take one of the regular buses to Hilvan from the
otogar (TL 5) — it takes around an hour. Ring Nomad Tours ahead and
someone from the village will collect you from Hilvan. With your own
transport follow the D-885 to Hilvan (the Siverek/Diyarbakır road)
and turn right (signed Gölcuk) at the second set of lights. Follow
the road for a few kilometers before taking the second right to
Yuvacalı village.

www.nomadtoursturkey.com
www.abrahamspathturkey.org.

ANKARA: Hollande Determined To Prepare A New Bill

HOLLANDE DETERMINED TO PREPARE A NEW BILL

Turkish Press

July 9 2012

French President Francois Hollande stated that a new bill
criminalizing the denial of Armenian allegations pertaining to the
incidents of 1915 would be on the agenda again.

According to a statement made by the French Presidential Palace to the
French news agency AFP, Hollande made a commitment during a phone
conversation with officials from the Coordination Council of Armenian
Organizations of France (CCAF) that he would prepare a new bill in
accordance with his promises during the election campaigns.

The statement said that Hollande maintains his views about the
preparation of a new bill, adding that preparations are being made to
ensure that the new bill is not rejected by the Constitutional Council
of France again.

Reportedly, Hollande will hold contacts with officials from the CCAF
about preparation of the new bill by the end of this month.

http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=382680

Executive Profile: Mark Hoplamazian, Hyatt Hotels President And CEO

EXECUTIVE PROFILE: MARK HOPLAMAZIAN, HYATT HOTELS PRESIDENT AND CEO

HospitalityNet

July 9 2012

Mark Hoplamazian was a freshly minted MBA graduate when consummate
dealmaker Jay Pritzker hired him to work on new investments and
acquisitions in 1989. Almost immediately, the 25-year-old grandson
of Armenian Christian immigrants found himself in an awkward position
within the tightly knit Jewish family business. “He came in and nobody
could spell or pronounce ‘Hoplamazian,’ so I named him ‘Steinberg,'”
said Tom Pritzker, who has succeeded his late father as head of
The Pritzker Organization, the financial and investment adviser to
family businesses.

http://www.hospitalitynet.org/news/4056814.html

Génocide : Elysée contre Quai d’Orsay

EDITORIAL
Génocide : Elysée contre Quai d’Orsay

La cacophonie entre le quai d’Orsay et l’Elysée sur la question
arménienne n’est pas nouvelle. Même si celle qui vient de se faire
entendre à la faveur des déclarations discordantes de François
Hollande et de Laurent Fabius sur la loi de pénalisation du
négationnisme semble particulièrement spectaculaire. On se souvient
qu’Alain Juppé, interrogé sur ses divergences avec Nicolas Sarkozy sur
cette même question avait repris à son compte le 2 février dernier la
formule de Jean-Pierre Chevènement : « un ministre, ça ferme sa gueule
ou ça s’en va ». Le ministre est resté. Faut-il en déduire que sa
différence de position avec le Président n’était pas à ce point
fondamentale pour justifier une démission ?

En tout cas, Laurent Fabius a voté en tant que député la loi sur
laquelle s’est engagé l’actuel Chef de l’Etat et dont le PS a été
l’artisan historique. Et sa récente déclaration devant Ahmet Davutoglu
ne porte à cet égard pas tant sa marque personnelle, que celle de
l’administration du Quai qui a toujours manifesté une grande force
d’inertie pour intégrer, jusque dans son vocabulaire, les décisions du
pouvoir politique, qu’il soit législatif ou exécutif. Il a fallu en
effet attendre plus de cinq ans, c’était en l’occurrence à la faveur
de l’année de l’Arménie en France, pour que ses membres fassent usage
du concept de génocide arménien, pourtant reconnu par le Parlement et
promulgué par Jacques Chirac le 29 janvier 2001.

Cette résistance à répercuter les prises de décisions démocratiques
s’inscrit dans le conservatisme inhérent à cette vénérable institution
qui a vocation à privilégier ses relations avec les Etats constitués
plutôt qu’à s’épancher sur les doléances des peuples. Pour elle encore
plus que pour toute autre instance gouvernementale, une injustice vaut
toujours mieux qu’un désordre. L’histoire des Arméniens a été
endeuillée plus souvent qu’à son tour par ce cynisme. D’ailleurs, si
le Quai remplissait bien son rôle, et s’il se mettaient à la
disposition du pouvoir élu au lieu de chercher à lui en imposer, il
n’y aurait pas besoin d’une cellule parallèle à l’Elysée, et celle-ci
ne serait pas encline à court-circuiter les canaux habituels de la
diplomatie. L’épisode de la guerre Lybienne constitue une illustration
récente de cette réalité. Et il est probable que Fabius n’a été qu’à
moitié dupe de l’influence de son administration, dont tout semble
indiqué qu’elle voulait prendre une revanche sur ce sujet. Le ministre
des Affaires étrangères avait en effet exactement déclaré le 2 juillet
que « Le Conseil constitutionnel a décidé que la proposition de loi
qui avait été présentée par les parlementaires était contraire à notre
Constitution, donc il n’est pas possible de reprendre le même chemin
sinon le résultat sera évidemment le même ». Des propos dont la portée
négative par rapport à ce texte de loi n’ont échappé à personne, mais
dont le sens renvoyait plus à sa forme plutôt qu’à son fond.

Face à ces ambiguïtés génératrices de graves malentendus, François
Hollande a eu le courage politique qu’on attendait de lui en tranchant
dans le vif, rappelant la philosophie de sa campagne qui doit présider
à son exercice du pouvoir : « je ferais ce que j’ai dit » et « quand
il faudra décider, la justice sera au centre de mes choix ». Un geste
qui l’honore et dont il n’est pas innocent qu’il trouve à s’exprimer
en ce début de mandat justement dans le registre des Affaires
étrangères.

Ara Toranian

dimanche 8 juillet 2012,
Ara ©armenews.com

Legge per il negazionismo armeno

Il SecoloXIX , Italia
8 luglio 2012

Legge per il negazionismo armeno

Genova – Il presidente francese François Hollande ha annunciato
l’intenzione di presentare una nuova proposta di legge per punire il
negazionismo del genocidio degli armeni, in «accordo con gli impegni
presi durante la campagna elettorale». Lo ha reso noto la presidenza
francese confermando una telefonata tra Hollande e un rappresentante
del Consiglio delle organizzazioni armene in Francia.

A quasi sei mesi dalla decisione del Consiglio costituzionale francese
di bocciare la legge che puniva il negazionismo del genocidio armeno,
il presidente che succede a Nicolas Sarkozy ha invece ribadito di
voler presentare una nuova proposta di legge. I rappresentanti della
comunità armena presenti in Francia temevano che una proposta in tal
senso potesse non divenire realtà dopo che il ministro degli Esteri
francese Laurent Fabius aveva parlato di una nuova tappa nelle
relazioni fra Parigi e Ankara, incontrando giovedì il suo omologo
turco.

«Non ci sarà alcuna modifica» degli impegni presi durante la campagna
elettorale di Hollande, «ma bisognerà trovare il modo di creare un
testo compatibile con la Costituzione francese», ha riferito un
portavoce della presidenza.

Major problems in Armenia’s north-western border village

Major problems in Armenia’s north-western border village

tert.am
17:29 – 08.07.12

The village of Ashnak, situated near Armenia’s north-western border
(Argatsotn province), has around 1,500 residents and 400 households,
with very few dwellings being totally shut up.

Speaking to Tert.am, the community’s governor, Gevorg Martirosyan,
said such houses make up 1%-2% in the village. According to him, many
of their residents travel abroad for seasonal work in summer but they
later return home.

`A major problem in the village is the absence of jobs. Ninety percent
of the youth is unemployed and is dreaming about finding work. We ask
and call for opening some workshop so as our youth could go and work
there,’ he said.

The people in the village earn their living predominantly by
cattle-breeding and gardening, things that Martirosyan said are only
enough for making both ends meet.

Irrigation water has been a major concern in Ashnak for several years now.

`Before the collapse of the Soviet Union, we received pump station
water from the Akhuryan river. But today, we no longer have that
opportunity. A villager has to rely on rainfalls in spring, but this
year saw a draught, as you know, so there will be no more grain from
the 100- hectare of sown areas of Ashnak,’ said Martirosyan, adding
that the chief of the Territorial Administration Ministry’s Water
Economy Department has promised to provide a solution to the problem.

Drinking water too, appears to be a problem in the village as the
shortage of irrigation resources causes most villagers to use drinking
water for their gardens.

`There is one spring today for the entire village. We supply drinking
water to the population for [limited] hours – three hours in one
district and three hours in another. The village will not have a
drinking water shortage if the problem of the irrigation water is done
away with,’ he noted.

Matevosyan further spoke of asphalt pavement problems, noting that
most highways in Ashnak do not have an asphalt surface at all. The
community governor said that he has turned even to the president with
the problem and is hopeful to receive a positive response in the near
future.

Francia: nuova legge contro negazione genocidio armeno

AGI – Agenzia Giornalistica Italia
8 luglio 2012

Francia: nuova legge contro negazione genocidio armeno

AGI) Parigi – Dopo la bocciatura da parte della Corte Costituzionale
francese della legge che puniva la negazione del genocidio armeno il
presidente Hollande pensa ad un nuovo provvedimento che reintroduca il
divieto, voluto dal suo predecessore Nicolas Sarkozy. E’ quanto fa
sapere l’Eliseo.

Il precedente provvedimento aveva fatto scendere il gelo tra Turchia e
Francia. Gli armeni accusano i turchi aver ucciso 1,5 milioni di
ppartenenti al loro popolo tra il 1915 e il 1916 .

http://www.agi.it/iphone/notizie/201207080700-est-rom0004-francia_nuova_legge_contro_negazione_genocidio_armeno