The 3 Ruling Coalition Parties To Meet More Frequently Ahead Of Elec

THE 3 RULING COALITION PARTIES TO MEET MORE FREQUENTLY AHEAD OF ELECTIONS: SPOKESPERSON

epress.am
01.31.2012

Leaders of the three parties that comprise Armenia’s ruling coalition
– Armenian President and leader of the Republican Party of Armenia
(HHK) Serzh Sargsyan, Prosperous Armenia party (BHK) leader Gagik
Tsarukyan and Orinats Yerkir (Rule of Law, or OEK) party leader Artur
Baghdasaryan – met on Monday evening at the president’s office.

Speaking to RFE/RL’s Armenian service (Azatutyun), HHK spokesperson
and parliamentary vice chair Eduard Sharmazanov said the coalition
leaders’ meetings are regular events in the country’s political arena
and the more the parliamentary elections approach, the more often
these meetings will take place.

As for reports of internal disputes (particularly between HHK and
BHK, as a result of which it is said BHK will leave the coalition),
Sharmazanov said: “If I am stating a conviction that the the leaders
of the three coalition parties will continue to meet, with that I am
also responding to your question.”

Unconfirmed reports have indicated that a new memorandum will be signed
at one of these meetings; however, the HHK spokesperson didn’t wish
to comment on this news.

From: A. Papazian

MP’s separatist sympathy prompts ire in Azerbaijan

MP’s separatist sympathy prompts ire in Azerbaijan
PHILLIP COOREY

January 30, 2012

The state upper house Labor MP Walt Secord has incurred the wrath of
the government of Azerbaijan for visiting one of its disputed
territories and siding with the sovereignty claims of the separatist
Armenians.

Mr Secord, a former adviser to NSW premiers Bob Carr and Kristina
Keneally, as well as the former state treasurer Eric Roozendaal and
former prime minister Kevin Rudd, entered the upper house after the
March election.

He is the deputy chairman of the NSW Parliamentary Friends of Israel
and the deputy co-chairman of the NSW Parliamentary Friends of
Armenia.

A supporter of various separatist causes, Mr Secord visited the
disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh last month as part of a
self-funded trip that also took him to Israel, the Palestinian
territories and Kurdish Iraq.

Nagorno-Karabakh is recognised internationally, including by
Australia, as part of the former Soviet republic of Azerbaijan but
Armenia lays claim to the region.

Mr Secord said he was told while there that he was the first
Australian MP to visit the region.

”While official recognition of the Mountainous Karabakh Re- public is
a matter for the federal Australian government,” Mr Secord said, ”I
feel I have a duty as the co-deputy chair of the NSW Parliamentary
Friends of Armenia to see Armenia and the Mountainous Karabakh
Republic first-hand.”

Officials from the Azerbaijani embassy in the Turkish capital, Ankara,
complained to the Australian mission in the same city about the visit
by the ”senator of the Australian state of NSW, Walt Secord”.

An Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry spokesman, Elman Abdullayev, told
local media: “The Australian embassy told the Azerbaijani side that
the official stance of the country lies in recognition of the
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and non-recognition of any
separatist regime in its territory.”

Mr Secord said many of his colleagues had been ”flooded by an email
campaign” protesting against his visit.

From: A. Papazian

http://m.smh.com.au/nsw/mps-separatist-sympathy-prompts-ire-in-azerbaijan-20120129-1qo0t.html

Shirak Center presents history of two families starving from hunger

Shirak Center presents history of two families starving from hunger
and in poverty in Armenia’s Gyumri (VIDEO)

NEWS.AM
January 28, 2012 | 17:54

GYUMRI. – Shirak Center presents histories of two homeless families,
aiming to attract attention of responsible bodies.

In a territory called Vard-Bagh near Armenia’s Gyumri city live mainly
homeless families in extreme social conditions, who are not subject to
house compensation by the state.

The Center visited two families taking care of orphan children.

Anna Simonyan, 25 having 7 and 3 years old children has returned from
Russia two years ago. Her family has no place to live. As a result of
having no registration, she is devoid of receiving social benefits.
She has no source of income and starves from hunger and in poverty.
Her daughter Laura, 7, attends a boarding school for mentally disabled
children.

The other homeless family describes is Liana Melikyan, 33, with 3
small children.

Her daughter Naira, 12, attends boarding school, her son Tigran, 9, is
disabled since childhood and the smallest is Lusine, 2.

This family also has no registration and is devoid of any social benefit.

From: A. Papazian

Corpse of 56 year-old landlord discovered in Armenian Gyumri

Corpse of 56 year-old landlord discovered in Armenian Gyumri

NEWS.AM
January 28, 2012 | 21:08

GYUMRI. – On Saturday night Armenia’s Emergency service received
information that a Gyumri citizen does not answer phone calls and does
not open the door.

The Armenia’s Emergency service informs Armenian News-NEWS.am that the
rescuers opened the door and found the corpse of the 56-year-old man.
>From then on, the workers of the Ambulance Service took over.

From: A. Papazian

Women’s Rights Activists Demand Dismissal of Syunik Governor

Women’s Rights Activists Demand Dismissal of Syunik Governor
Posted by Armenian Weekly

January 28, 2012

YEREVAN (A.W.)-The Coalition to Stop Violence Against Women in
December 2011 drafted a petition demanding Syunik Governor Suren
Khachatrian’s dismissal from office. Khachatrian had publicly
assaulted businesswoman Silva Hambardzumian on Nov. 14 in the lobby of
Yerevan’s Marriott Hotel after she accused him of theft.

`[The assault] did not even receive public condemnation from our
government,’ the coalition said in a statement, adding that
Khachatrian had also recently threatened environmental activist Mariam
Sukhudyan in public.

`This would be unacceptable in any civilized society. When a man,
especially a government official, displays such violent behavior and
the government does not at least condemn it or punish it, it is a
message to all that violence against women is condoned and an accepted
practice in Armenia,’ the statement read. `We consider that such acts
reinforce a culture of violence and encourage violence towards women,
which is so rampant among Armenian families. We ask that the governor
be sacked for such uncivilized behavior.’

To sign the petition, visit

From: A. Papazian

www.CoalitionAgainstViolence.org.

Arrêtez Monsieur Jean Daniel, vous êtes négationniste !

GENOCIDE ARMENIEN
Arrêtez Monsieur Jean Daniel, vous êtes négationniste !
Le fondateur du « Nouvel Observateur » persiste et signe

Jean Daniel, l’un des fondateurs du « Nouvel Observateur » est un
révisionniste ! Il est le seul journaliste Français à nier le génocide
arménien. Négationniste insidieux après ses deux éditoriaux du 4 et 13
janvier mettant en doute le « caractère génocidaire » des crimes de
1915, le vieil homme qui emploie le terme « tragédie » ou « massacres
de certaines populations arméniennes » pour ne pas évoquer le terme «
génocide » se dit victime d’un « malentendu » par les Arméniens. Quel
malentendu ? Car en matière de négationnisme on ne peut être plus
clair. Et Jean Daniel a tort de s’étonner qu’on ne le comprenne pas.
On l’a bien compris : il est de la lignée des pires négationnistes qui
font le jeu du négationnisme de l’Etat turc. K.A.

Ci-dessous l’article de Jean Daniel dans son intégralité. Puis la
réponse de l’historien Raymond Kévorkian parue également dans « Le
Nouvel Observateur ».

« Jean Daniel répond à nos lecteurs » « Le Nouvel Observateur » du 26
Janvier 2012 (n° 2464).

« Au cours de ma longue carrière, j’ai eu parfois l’occasion de
défendre des causes avec des arguments qui heurtaient la sensibilité
de mes lecteurs, pourtant les plus attentifs. Après m’être expliqué
auprès d’eux, force m’a été d’arriver à la conclusion qu’il y avait
entre nous un réel désaccord. J’ai assumé ce constat. J’ai assumé ce
constat avec regret. En revanche, je ne me suis jamais résigné aux
malentendus. Or, dans ce débat sur l’opportunité de sanctionner la
contestation de la réalité génocidaire du massacre des Arméniens par
les Turcs en 1915, les propos ont été non pas réfutés, mais mal
compris. Je suis donc obligé de rappeler que je n’ai jamais
sous-estimé l’horreur insupportable du massacre de certaines
populations arméniennes par les Turcs. Cette barbarie m’a toujours
inspiré une irrépressible aversion. Qu’il s’agisse des Juifs, des
Tsiganes, des Ukrainiens, des Khmers ou des Rwandais, j’ai chaque fois
estimé que l’humanité se déshonorait. Quand il s’est agi plus
précisément des Arméniens, et comme j’étais en rapport avec quelques
intellectuels turcs de renom, je leur ai demandé d’organiser une
rencontre avec des écrivains et des artistes arméniens pour qu’ils
admettent en commun la réalité de ces massacres et pour qu’ils le
condamnent ensemble. Ces précisions, pour moi essentielles, ne
devaient pas être oubliées ou négligées par les reproches qui me sont
faits. Je n’ai jamais, évidemment, fait de différence entre les
victimes, même si les bourreaux n’ont pas employé des moyens
identiques. Mais il s’agit d’un problème différent lorsqu’on prétend
confier à un Etat le soin de trancher dans une question historique
quelle qu’elle soit. Nous autres Français avons le triste souvenir de
notre Etat lorsqu’il a prétendu arbitrer en faveur de l’état-major de
l’armée française contre le capitaine Alfred Dreyfus, scandaleusement
condamné pour trahison. (…) Or, en ce moment, c’est encore à l’Etat
que l’on voudrait confier le droit de décider si les massacres
survenus en Turquie relèvent d’une catégorie bien spéciale des crimes
contre l’humanité et auxquels on a donné le nom de génocide. Or
qu’est-ce qu’un génocide ? Selon la législation inaugurée en 1945 à
Nuremberg, c’est un massacre collectif perpétré avec l’intention
d’exterminer totalement une race, une religion ou un peuple. C’est la
volonté d’éradiquer toute espèce d’existence à des hommes et à des
femmes parce qu’ils sont nés dans certaines conditions et sous un
certain vocable. Sur ce dernier point, à savoir la volonté
indiscutable des Turcs d’exterminer totalement jusqu’aux derniers
survivants les Arméniens, cette thèse est discutée par des hommes
politiques et des juristes aussi respectables les uns que les autres.
Seul un tribunal international pourrait devoir trancher. Si tous les
massacres relevaient du génocide, alors rien ne pourrait être
construit dans l’avenir du fait de l’hostilité des différentes
mémoires collectives. Alors, et pour conclure, j’accepte que l’on
puisse être en désaccord sur la définition du génocide et sur le droit
des Etats à désigner ceux à qui elle s’appliquerait. Mais je n’accepte
pas le malentendu qui fait de moi un homme insensible à la tragédie
des Arméniens ».

Jean Daniel

« Arménie : le travail des historiens » par Raymond Kévorkian, historien.

« Dans son éditorial daté du 4 janvier, en grande partie consacré au
vif débat qui a eu lieu depuis la mi-décembre autour du projet de loi
pénalisant la négation des génocides, Jean Daniel exprime son
opposition aux « lois mémorielles » et, dans la foulée, remet
clairement en doute l’intentionnalité dans la destruction des
Arméniens ottomans, c’est-à-dire la qualification de génocide. Il a
ainsi marqué sa singularité, puisque même parmi les plus vifs
opposants à la loi nous n’avons pas observé de remise en cause de la
réalité du génocide. Phénomène qu’on doit certainement au patient
travail mené par quelques historiens ces vingt dernières années. Outre
l’exhumation d’une masse considérable de fonds d’archives
diplomatiques, missionnaires, politiques, administratives, militaires,
ces chercheurs ont, chacun à leur manière, apporté un éclairage sur le
programme d’homogénéisation ethnique porté par le Comité central
jeune-turc, sur sa radicalisation progressive, sur le nationalisme et
le darwinisme social qui l’animaient, sur le rôle des paramilitaires
dans l’Organisation spéciale dans les meurtres de masse, sur la prise
de décision, sur les convois de déportés ou les camps de concentration
installés en Syrie et Mésopotamie. Dans un va-et-vient permanent entre
victimes et bourreaux, ces mêmes historiens ont progressivement levé
les points d’ombre ne laissant plus aucun doute sur l’intentionnalité
et l’ampleur de ce crime d’Etat. Une quinzaine d’Allemands,
Américains, Arméniens, Britanniques, Français, Kurdes, Néerlandais,
Italiens et Turcs ont publié des travaux, principalement en anglais et
en français, qui ont permis au monde universitaire de se faire une
opinion. La plupart des turcologues européens et américains, parmi
lesquels se recrutaient les plus sceptiques, ont ainsi revu leurs
positions, confessant parfois qu’ils avaient suivi un peu trop
aveuglément les thèses de l’historiographie officielle développée par
l’Etat turc. Cet apport historien n’est sans doute pas étranger au
développement en Turquie d’un travail de mémoire, animé par une
poignée d’universitaires et de militants des droits de l’homme. En
luttant contre un déni d’Etat, ils tentent de briser le cercle vicieux
de l’idéologie nationaliste encore à l’`uvre en Turquie contre les
nouveaux « ennemis intérieurs », les Kurdes ». Raymond Kevorkian

Krikor Amirzayan

dimanche 29 janvier 2012,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

Glendale City Council Rejects Donated Painting By Iranian-Armenian

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL REJECTS DONATED PAINTING BY IRANIAN-ARMENIAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
January 27, 2012 – 12:34 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – An oil painting featuring the Statue of Liberty
surrounded by the floating heads of popular Armenian figures recently
became the first donated work of art to the city in more than a decade
to be turned down, Glendale News-Press reported.

The painting also includes flowing wheat, Mt. Ararat and a statue of
an Armenian princess.

While one commissioner called it “a beautiful theme,” the painting
failed to make it past the Arts & Culture Commission or City Council
and onto a city-owned office wall – the first time that’s happened
since 2000, said Public Art Project Manager Ripsime Marashian.

According to a staff report, the 18-by-24 inch painting, appraised
at $1,800, also wasn’t of the highest aesthetic quality.

The artist, Anita Garouni, is an Iranian immigrant with Armenian
ancestry who has lived in Glendale for 15 years. She told the
commission that her painting, titled “Home,” represents the love she
feels for the United States and her Armenian culture.

Marashian said the city’s decision-making process for accepting
donated art includes considering the work’s relation to the city,
maintenance requirements and aesthetics.

Since 2000, the city has received 10 donated pieces of art, including
Garouni’s. Most have been paintings, Marashian said.

The last accepted art donation was in 2008. The sculpture, which was
made public last year, represents the helmet and coat of a Glendale
firefighter who suffered burns over more than 70% of his body while
battling a fire nearly 15 years ago.

In 2003, the city accepted two donated paintings by artist Zadik
Zadikian of a 1940s police car and an old police shield. Zadikian had
offered the city a third similar painting, but he wanted $20,000 for
it, so the city passed on the offer.

Grigorian said he hoped the rejection of Garouni’s painting didn’t
deter other artists from donating to the city.

The city also plans to unveil an arts-focused website in coming months
that will hopefully spur additional donations, Marashian said.

From: A. Papazian

Armenian President Had No Right To Determine Punishment: Human Right

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT HAD NO RIGHT TO DETERMINE PUNISHMENT: HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERS (UPDATED)

epress.am
01.27.2012

A 2003 decree by then president of Armenia Robert Kocharian that
granted 38 prisoners amnesty by having their death penalty sentence
changed to life imprisonment violated the European Convention on
Human Rights and also Armenia’s Constitution, said experts at a round
table on Thursday on issues of prisoners in Armenia sentenced to life
in prison.

Human rights lawyer Arayik Ghazaryan asserted that according to the
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
the former president only had the right to grant a pardon, but not
to decide the punishment – that’s the function of the judiciary.

“Article 7 of the European Convention says that the penalty should
be made only on the basis of law. But the European Court’s right to
precedence says pardon, mitigation of the sentence, is not subject
to Article 7 because it’s the application of punishment and not
the appointing of punishment,” said Ghazaryan, adding that if those
38 prisoners were to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights,
Armenia would have some problems on its hands.

The president, it seems, determined the punishment also in the eyes
of Armenia’s legislation, added human rights lawyer Vahe Grigoryan,
explaining that, it seems, “punishment determined by the president”
has replaced the death penalty.

Another issue that concerns the Civil Initiative to Support Prisoners
Sentenced to Life is that the 2010 legislative amendment which
determined the maximum sentence for life imprisonment to be 20 years
(instead of the previous 15) doesn’t actually address cases examined
before the amendment was made.

“In some cases, considering 15 years to be a light sentence, judges
in the past preferred to give life sentences. It was assumed that by
determining the maximum to be 20 years, the number of those given life
sentences would be reduced. However, all 97 lifers [out of 104 in the
country] who appealed to the courts (with the request to review their
punishments), considering that the change is applicable retroactively,
were rejected by the court,” said Armenian Helsinki Committee human
rights lawyer Robert Revazyan, adding that, in his opinion, the court
made a wrong move, since if these same people were sentenced today
not all would be given life sentences.

Updated 3 pm on Friday, Jan. 27: “Robert Kocharian” replaced “Serzh
Sargsyan” who was incorrectly named as the president who granted
the amnesty.

From: A. Papazian

Tsvetana Paskaleva Happy To Be Armenian Citizen

TSVETANA PASKALEVA HAPPY TO BE ARMENIAN CITIZEN

Tert.am
27.01.12

Tsvetana Paskaleva, journalist and documentary film author, who
widely covered the Nagorno-Karabakh war, does not object to acquiring
Armenia’s citizenship.

At her Friday meeting with journalists, she said that she has been
awaiting for this proposal.

“It would be a great honor to me to be granted Armenian citizenship.

But, I do not think I should be the first to propose,” Paskaleva said.

From: A. Papazian

Clinton Calls Genocide Recognition A ‘Dangerous Door’

CLINTON CALLS GENOCIDE RECOGNITION A ‘DANGEROUS DOOR’
BY ARA KHACHATOURIAN

asbarez
Thursday, January 26th, 2012

Clinton at the 2010 QDDR town hall

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Thursday said the recognition of
the Armenian Genocide by the US “opens a door that is a very dangerous
one to go through.” This is the same Hillary Clinton who, four years
ago, pledged that she would recognize the Genocide as President of
the United States.

Responding to a question from a participant of a Town Hall Meeting
on Thursday, who asked why the US does not recognize the Genocide,
Clinton characterized the Armenian Genocide as an historical issue
and not a political one.

“I think it’s fair to say that this has always been viewed, and I think
properly so, as a matter of historical debate and conclusions rather
than political. And I think that is the right posture for the United
States Government to be in, because whatever the terrible event might
be or the high emotions that it represents, to try to use government
power to resolve historical issues, I think, opens a door that is a
very dangerous one to go through. So the issue is a very emotional
one; I recognize that and I have great sympathy for those who are
just so incredibly passionate about it,” Clinton told the audience.

“But I think the free market of ideas, the academic community, the
open architecture of communication that is even greater now than it
was in the past, are the proper fora for this kind of engagement,
and that’s where I hope it is worked out. And eventually, people will
have their own conclusions, which needs to be respected, but we need
to encourage anyone on any side of any contentious historical debate
to get out into the marketplace of ideas. Muster your evidence, put
forth your arguments, and be willing to engage, and that’s what I
think should happen on that too,” added Clinton who received a round
of applause from the audience.

She also took time to respond to a question from the same person on
Monday’s passage of the French Senate resolution criminalizing the
denial of the Armenian Genocide.

“…One of our great strengths is we do not criminalize speech. People
can say nearly anything they choose, and they do, in our country. And
so other countries, including close friends and allies like France,
have different standards, different histories, but we are, I hope,
never going to go down that path to criminalize speech,” explained
the Secretary of State, who seems to have forgotten that there are
succinct laws against hate speech in the US, under which people can
be prosecuted.

Clinton’s letter in 2008 (click to enlarge)

Exactly four years ago this week, then Sen. Clinton had this to say:
“I believe the horrible events perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire
against Armenians constitute a clear case of genocide. I have twice
written to President Bush calling on him to refer to the Armenian
Genocide in his annual commemorative statement and, as President,
I will recognize the Armenian Genocide. Our common morality and our
nation’s credibility as a voice for human rights challenge us to
ensure that the Armenian Genocide be recognized and remembered by
the Congress and the President of the United States.”

This is, by far, one of the more patronizing statements coming
out of the Secretary of State, and the Obama Administration. Her
statement today calls into question whether the US has ceased to be
“a voice for human rights” or has the definition of that principle
changed since Barack Obama took office three years ago. Or, how did
the Armenian Genocide, about which she wrote to President Bush become
“a dangerous door” in a matter of four years?

Her statements indicate that the US government is beholden to a foreign
government-Turkey-in its policy making and is really not an advocate
for human rights worldwide but a willing participant in a systematic
and calculated campaign of lies that continues to stain Turkey as a
citizen of the civilized world.

“The Obama-Biden Administration – with Secretary Clinton’s latest
remarks – continues to dig itself deeper and deeper into a hole
of complicity in Turkey’s genocide denial,” said Aram Hamparian,
Executive Director of the Armenian National Committee of America.

“It’s a sad spectacle to see Secretary Clinton hiding behind cynical
appeals to scholars – the overwhelming majority of whom have already
spoken forcefully against Turkey’s denials of the Armenian Genocide
– to divert attention from either President Obama’s, Vice President
Biden’s or her own personal promises to properly recognize this crime
and, more broadly, to divert attention from America’s failure to meet
her moral obligation to stand up against a foreign government’s veto
of our defense of human rights,” continued Hamparian.

“The Secretary’s unfounded and offensive references to ‘historical
debate’ in regards to the Armenian Genocide only embolden the Turkish
Government – which, just today, again took steps toward deporting
Armenians,” concluded Hamparian.

The Obama Administration’s latest ploy to massage this ridiculous
message is laughable at best and devoid of any credibility. Its defense
of Turkish interests at any cost, goes counter to the international
community’s conventional wisdom and makes US policymakers seem backward
in their approach to human rights issues.

This latest statement by Clinton should not elicit anger, but rather
it should further call into question this administration’s ability
to effectively lead.

From: A. Papazian