CivilNet: Stepanakert Schools Reopen as Students Slowly Return to Karabakh

CIVILNET.AM

08:11

Schools in Nagorno-Karabakh have been closed since the start of the Karabakh War on September 27. For over a month, constant Azerbaijani shelling in civilian areas led to mass evacuations and destruction of public facilities, including schools and hospitals. 

On December 1, following the signing of the “end of war” agreement, some schools reopened. The CIVILNET team visited Stepanakert School Number 8, where students who were originally studying at the school are also joined by students who have arrived from different areas. There are roughly 750 students studying at the school at the moment; they have come from all parts of Artsakh.

Sports: Argentine-Armenian Lucas Zelarayan named 2020 MLS Cup’s Most Valuable Player

Public Radio of Armenia
Dec13 2020
Argentine-Armenian Lucas Zelarayan named 2020 MLS Cup’s Most Valuable Player

Columbus Crew midfielder Lucas Zelarayan was named the 2020 MLS Cup’s Most Valuable Player (MVP) after scoring twice and providing an assist as his side thumped defending champions Seattle Sounders 3-0 on Saturday, Massis Post reports.

The Argentine-Armenian playmaker, who arrived from Tigres in the offseason in a deal worth a reported $7 million, opened the scoring in the 25th minute when he fired a low-volley past Seattle keeper Stefan Frei.

The 28-year-old turned provider for the second goal, finding Derrick Etienne Jr. in space, with the Haitian winger unleashing a curling effort past Frei into the far corner.

Zelarayan netted his second in the 82nd minute after neat wing play from Luis Diaz to become the second player in MLS Cup history to be involved in three goals in a final after the Crew’s Guillermo Barros Schelotto in 2008.

Crew coach Caleb Porter described Zelarayan as “unbelievably special”.

“I’ve coached good players before but this guy is unbelievable.

“We shared a great moment after the game. He told me I changed his life. And I told him he changed my life.

“I brought him here to win championships. He seemed to be looking for something new to stimulate him. A lot of time I’ve seen guys are cutthroat, they sell their souls a little and lose their way. But he came here and I think he looks like a new man.” Porter said of Zelarayan.

Born in Córdoba, Argentina, Zelarayán is of Armenian descent. He received an invitation to represent the Armenia national team in June 2018.

https://en.armradio.am/2020/12/14/argentine-armenian-lucas-zelarayan-named-2020-mls-cups-most-valuable-player/

Impossible to demarcate Armenia’s state border on the basis of Google Maps – Ombudsman

Public Radio of Armenia

Dec13 2020

It is impossible to demarcate or delimit the state borders of Armenia on the basis of Google Maps or Google Global Positioning System (Google GPS), Armenia’s Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan says.

“It is not clear which version of Google Maps is the basis when Google itself mentions that there are many versions of online maps of the world. Or have we found out what algorithmic systems or positioning mechanisms underlie a particular version of an online map?” the Ombudsman says.

“The researches and observations of the Human Rights Defender of Armenia in the border settlements confirm that this approach seriously endangers the constitutional rights of life, physical and mental immunity, property of the residents of the border settlements,” Tatoyan adds.

“It is about the protection of the borders of our state, the physical security and safety of our people and each person,” the Human Rights Defender says, adding that “the issue of demarcations or delimitations requires professional approaches, results of scientific research, detailed on-site work, proper legal bases, etc.”

He stresses that the issue should be one of the exclusive priorities of our country, in the focus of everyone’s atttention.

Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict Continues Despite Ceasefire

EuroWeekly News
Dec 13 2020

ARMENIA and Azerbaijan have continued armed clashes in the disputed Nargorno-Karabakh region just weeks after signing a ceasefire agreement.

— Advertisement —

Both former USSR states agreed to a ceasefire tabled by Russia, after a brief and bloody war that began in September and has claimed the lives of 143 civilians and thousands of soldiers. Analysts believe the agreement was seen as a victory for Azerbaijan and a defeat for Armenia, who have bitterly disputed the Nagorno-Karabakh region for decades.

Most recently Azerbaijan’s Defence Ministry announced that 4 of their troops had been killed, while Armenia said 6 of their soldiers had been wounded by an Azeri offensive. This recent spark of violence has led many observers to fear a full return to fighting that has already displaced thousands of civilians in the Caucasus region, a mountainous area bridging Europe and western Asia.

Since the end of a brutal war in the early 1990s neither country has ever managed to fully make peace with one another, as ethnic Armenians rule the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. Since signing the recent peace agreement, Armenia has promised to withdraw troops from 3 key areas while Azerbaijan managed to secure the region’s second city of Shusha. Over 2000 Russian peacekeeping troops have also been deployed to the conflict zone.

Armenia’s President Nikol Pashinyan said the deal was “incredibly painful” to sign “both for me and for our people”. Global security analysts will be watching the coming days and weeks closely to see if a return to brutal warfare is imminent in the tinderbox region.

https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2020/12/13/armenia-azerbaijan-conflict-continues-despite-ceasefire/

Azerbaijan announces military deaths in Karabakh despite peace accord

Macau Business
Dec 13 2020

Azerbaijan announced on Sunday that four of its troops had been killed in the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region since a peace deal with Armenian separatists was agreed in early November.

The defence ministry said a group of Armenian fighters remained in the mountainous province — breaking the terms of the Russian-brokered truce — and had recently launched fatal attacks on Azerbaijan’s forces.

The ministry said three servicemen were killed in a separatist ambush on November 26 and another sustained fatal injuries during an attack near the village of Hadrut on Tuesday last week.

Both Armenia and Azerbaijan accused each other breaching the truce that ended six weeks of fighting between the longstanding foes for control of the breakaway region.

Armenia said on Sunday that six separatist fighters were injured in clashes with Azerbaijan troops after skirmishes broke out on Friday evening.

The Armenian defence ministry reported hours of fighting near Hadrut on Saturday, including with heavy artillery, claiming Azerbaijan had bolstered its military presence in the area.

“The Armenian side has six wounded,” the ministry said, describing the incident as an Azerbaijani “provocation”.

The defence ministry said the new fighting was discussed during a meeting in Moscow between Russian and Armenian defence ministers, while the foreign ministry said clashes continued into Sunday.

Azerbaijan said Sunday it had been forced to respond to recent fatal attacks on its servicemen by conducting anti-terror operations. 

The six-week conflict that erupted in September between the separatists backed by Armenia and Azerbaijan over the mountainous region ended November 10 with a Moscow-brokered peace deal that saw the Armenians cede swathes of territory.

More than 5,000 people including civilians were killed during the fighting between the ex-Soviet rivals, who fought a war in the 1990s over the mountainous region.

Russia has deployed nearly 2,000 peacekeeping troops to Nagorno-Karabakh as part of the peace deal and the Russian defence ministry Saturday reported that the truce had been violated.

It was Russia’s first report of a violation since the peace deal was introduced.

The French and US heads of the Minsk Group, which led talks on the conflict for decades but failed to achieve a lasting agreement, met Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in Baku on Saturday.

Aliyev described reports of new fighting as “troubling” and vowed to use an “iron fist” to “crush” Armenian forces completely if fighting erupts again.

Minsk Group envoys Stephane Visconti and Andrew Schofer were expected in Armenia’s capital Yerevan on Sunday.

On a visit to Baku this week, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan hailed what he called his close ally’s “glorious victory” in the conflict.

The Turkish leader, who attended celebrations marking Azerbaijan’s success, has overtly supported Baku, helping to train and arm its military.

Azerbaijan and Armenia accuse each other of violating peace deal

112 International
Dec 13 2020

Source : 112 Ukraine

It was reported by the Defense Ministries of this countries

Armenia and Azerbaijan have accused each other of violating a peace deal that ended six weeks of fighting over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region. This was reported by the Defense Ministries of the two countries.

The Armenian Defense Ministry reported that the Azerbaijani army mounted an attack in the south of Nagorno-Karabakh on Saturday.

Related: What’s next for Armenia’s military after devastating Nagorno-Karabakh defeat?

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev reacted by blaming Armenia for the new clashes and threatened to "break its head with an iron fist."

"Armenia shouldn’t try to start it all over again," Aliyev said during a meeting with top diplomats from the United States and France.

"It must be very cautious and not plan any military action. This time, we will fully destroy them. It mustn’t be a secret to anyone."

Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry said in a statement that its forces thwarted Armenian “provocations” and restored the ceasefire.

Related: Putin, Merkel discuss Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, effectiveness of Minsk agreements

Armenian officials said the fighting raged near the villages of Hin Tager and Khtsaberd, the only settlements in the Gadrut region that are still controlled by Armenian forces. They noted that the two villages have been fully encircled by the Azerbaijani army, which controls the only road leading to them.

As we reported earlier, Armenian Defense Ministry announced the offensive of Azerbaijani troops in the area of Old Tagar and Khtsarberd.

"On December 12, the Azerbaijani side resumed violations in the direction of the Old Tagar and Khtsaberd communities of the Artsakh Republic," the message says.

Earlier, the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic announced an attempt by the Azerbaijani military to attack one of the military positions.

Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Shows Chinese Military Needs Better Counter-strategy: Report

Republic World
Dec 13 2020
Written By

Bhavya Sukheja

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is a reminder to the Chinese military that they need to carefully consider counter-strategy as wars of the 21st century will be different from the battles of the past. While citing an article published by a firm that supplies military equipment to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that an alarming lesson from the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, which concerns drones’ transformation of battlefields, shows that China needs a better counter-strategy. It is worth noting that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is the first in which drones deployed by one side turned the tide in the Azerbaijan-Armenia war. 

According to reports, the ‘Naval and Merchant Ships’ article reviewed how the Armenian army was overwhelmed by enemy drones. Even though Armenia is superior to Azerbaijan in terms of conventional ground forces, the article noted that the Armenian army was easy prey for armed drones, especially Bayraktar TB2 drones that mounted precise attacks against targets in trenches and moving vehicles. The drones were also used for reconnaissance operations, which helped Azerbaijan to force an Armenian surrender within six weeks. 

READ: Flamethrower Drone Incinerates Wasp Nests In China

The article read, “In case of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the ‘shield’ to counter drones was not used effectively. Although each side hit large numbers of enemy drones, neither had the capabilities to stop incoming drones from inflicting damage”. 

It added, “Our military has a large number of drones of various types and is also facing the threat of advanced enemy drones.. compare with the drones we saw in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the drone threat confronting us is more technologically advanced, harder to detect and defend”. 

READ: Indian Navy Finalises Procurement Of Anti-drone Systems

Further, the article went on to suggest PLA that they should increase its awareness of the threat from drones and incorporate it into its training and strategy. It also suggested the Chinese army of building a multilayer detection network with anti-drone radars, blind compensation radars, radio detection stations and other infrared or acoustic measures in a bid to seamlessly monitor incoming drones in multiple locations in a wide range. Apart from detection, the article also recommended tactics such as electronic jamming, using LD2000 ground-based anti-aircraft defence weapons and scattering fake objects. 

According to ANI, China is known for its use of drones in the military as well as in surveillance over Uyghurs. They are reportedly developing new drones with greater capabilities in terms of speed, altitude, endurance and autonomy. Moreover, China has also developed a new low-cost “suicide drone” that can be launched from a light tactical vehicle or helicopter in a swarm to attack a target. 

Nagorno-Karabakh conflict flares despite ceasefire

EU Reporter
Dec 13 2020

By EU Reporter Correspondent

Four soldiers from Azerbaijan have been killed in clashes in the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region, Azerbaijan's defence ministry says.

The reports come only weeks after a six-week war over the territory which ended when Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire.

Armenia meanwhile said six of its own troops were wounded in what it called an Azerbaijani military offensive.

Nagorno-Karabakh has long been a trigger for violence between the two.

The region is recognised as part of Azerbaijan but has been run by ethnic Armenians since 1994 after the two countries fought a war over the territory which left thousands dead.

A Russian-brokered truce failed to bring about lasting peace and the area, claimed by both sides, has been prone to intermittent clashes.

What does the peace deal say?

  • Signed on 9 November, it locked in the territorial gains Azerbaijan made during the war, including the region's second-largest city Shusha
  • Armenia promised to withdraw troops from three areas
  • 2,000 Russian peacekeepers deployed to the region
  • Azerbaijan also gained a overland route to Turkey, its ally, by gaining access to a road link to an Azeri conflict on the Iran-Turkey border called Nakhchivan
  • The BBC's Orla Guerin said that, overall, the deal was regarded as a victory for Azerbaijan and a defeat for Armenia.

The latest conflict began at the end of September, killing around 5,000 soldiers on both sides.

At least 143 civilians died and thousands were displaced when their homes were damaged or soldiers entered their communities.

  • Why did Armenia and Azerbaijan go to war?
  • Russian influence under threat in its own backyard

Both countries have accused the other of violating the terms of the November peace deal and the latest hostilities flout the ceasefire.

The agreement was described by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan as "incredibly painful both for me and both for our people".

No casualties on Armenian side as a result of clashes near Hadrut

Public Radio of Armenia
Dec 13 2020

There are no casualties on the Armenian side as a result of the Sunday clashes near Hadrut. The Armenian Unified Infocenter refutes the reports of Azerbaijani media and Telegram channels claiming that the Armenian side sustained losses.

As reported earlier by the Ministry of Defense, six Armenian servicemen were wounded as a result of Azerbaijan’s provocative actions.

In violation of the trilateral agreement on the cessation of hostilities, special forces of the Azerbaijani army launched an attack on the Artsakh-Azerbaijan line of contact in the area of Hin Taghlar and Khtsaberd villages in Hadrut region of Artsakh.

After hours of fighting, the enemy managed to enter the village of Hin Tagher, and approach the village of Khtsaberd.

According to the Ministry of Defense, the Armenian, Azerbaijani and Russian military are negotiating the return of the parties to the former positions in Hadrut region.

The Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that “these actions of official Baku further underline the imperative to eliminate the consequences of the recent Azerbaijani aggression, including the de-occupation of the territories of Artsakh and the return of the Armenians of Artsakh to their places of residence.”

Twin sanction threat puts the squeeze on Erdogan

Asia Times


By Jonathan Gorvett
Dec. 12, 2020

[EU and US weigh punitive measures that if imposed would send Turkey’s
collapsing economy into free fall]


Battling the European Union (EU) over Eastern Mediterranean maritime
disputes while angering the US over a recent Russian missile deal,
Turkey now faces the threat of sanctions from two power blocks which
combined represent over a third of the global economy.

That prospect knocked points off the already embattled Turkish
currency this week, the lira, with concerns that new harsh measures
might send the already declining economy into a terminal tailspin. The
currency has fallen around 25% this year, worsening the economic
fallout caused by the pandemic.

“Given Turkey’s dire external position, further and stronger action by
the EU and/or the US could push the country back to the brink of a
balance of payments crisis,” warns Jason Tuvey, from Capital Economics
in London.

For now, however, internal divisions in Europe and personal ties
between the Turkish and US leaders look likely to moderate the impact
of any immediate action, though that could quickly change with the
incoming Joe Biden administration in the US.

“There’s concern on both sides of the Atlantic that harsher sanctions
could push Ankara further away,” Aykan Erdemir, senior director of the
Turkey Program at the Washington DC-based Foundation for Defense of
Democracies, told Asia Times.

In the longer term, though, the threat of a harsher response remains,
with both Europe and the US increasingly concerned over Turkey’s
foreign and domestic policy course, including “Neo-Ottoman” foreign
adventures that at least in part seek to restore the country’s Ottoman
Empire glory.

“Geopolitical tensions still pose a risk to Turkey’s outlook,” adds
Tuvey. Yet despite this, Turkey’s leader, President Recep Tayyip
Erdogan, “has shown little sign of toning down his belligerent
rhetoric.”

European blues

The EU’s current push for sanctions against Turkey originates in the
ongoing dispute between Ankara and EU members Greece and Cyprus over
Eastern Mediterranean sea and air boundaries.

Turkey does not recognize Greek claims to waters in and around the
Aegean Sea, nor Cypriot claims to a 200-kilometer Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ) off the de facto divided island.

In recent years, these disputes have become more active, with Turkey
sending its own oil and gas survey and drilling ships into offshore
blocks also claimed by Greece and the Greek Cypriots.

Collisions and stand-offs at sea have ensued, with warships deployed
to protect each side’s oil and gas vessels.

Repeated military exercises have also been held in the disputed
territories, by Turkey on the one hand and a coalition of Greek,
French, Egyptian, Cypriot and Emirati forces on the other.

Despite this, the Turkish survey ship, the Barbaros, with a flotilla
of naval escorts, continues to sail today within waters claimed by
Cyprus.

Earlier this summer, Turkey sent the Oruc Reis survey ship into an
area disputed with Greece. This triggered mobilization of the Greek
armed forces and a diplomatic intervention by EU term-president
Germany.

The de-escalation that followed saw the Oruc Reis return to port,
while the EU deferred any decision on action against Turkey until the
December 10-11 EU Council meeting.

Within a few days, however, the Oruc Reis had returned to the disputed
waters, staying there until just before the EU Council met this week
to discuss possible sanctions.

Missile trouble

At the same time, across the Atlantic, there is growing US
dissatisfaction with Turkey.

“It’s very hard to find support for Turkey’s positions in Washington
DC these days,” Ian Lesser, vice president of the German Marshall Fund
of the US in Brussels, told Asia Times.

This has followed a number of disputes, with one of the most recent
being NATO-member Turkey’s purchase of Russia’s highly effective S-400
anti-aircraft missiles, back in 2019.

This led to Turkey’s expulsion from the NATO F-35 fighter jet program,
after NATO chiefs said the S-400 deal compromised the aircraft’s
security.

The rift appeared to ease when Ankara agreed not to activate the
S-400s – yet, in October this year, the Turkish military test-fired a
missile from the system.

As a result, as an add-on to the latest US defense budget, Congress
has called for sanctions to be imposed on Turkey, including on its
defense industries, under the Countering American’s Adversaries
Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA).

While President Donald Trump, who has often boasted of his good
relationship with Erdogan, initially seemed likely to veto the
congressional move, on Friday news reports said that Trump would
likely sign off on an undisclosed range of sanctions.

“Neither Washington nor Brussels wants to be perceived as appeasing
the Erdogan government’s transgressions any further,” says Erdemir.

Competing interests

Yet, while “There is basically a consensus across the EU that what
Turkey has been doing is destabilizing,” says Lesser, “When it comes
to a policy response, it is all much less clear.”

On one end of the spectrum lies France – along with Greece and Cyprus
– which has championed tough action. On the other, “Berlin has a
stronger awareness of all the equity at stake when it comes to
Turkey.”

This “equity” includes Turkey’s major economic role in Europe, its
largest overseas market.

“Member states Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain, which have
significant investments in Turkey, are also worried that any further
turmoil in Turkish markets or retaliation by the Erdogan government
could hurt their companies,” says Erdemir.

Germany is also home to some four million ethnic Turks, representing
as much as 5% of the population, while the EU also has a major deal in
place with Turkey to prevent refugees from conflicts in Syria, Iraq
and beyond heading to Europe – a lightning rod political issue in many
European countries.

So far, the German view appears to have prevailed.

On December 11, the EU Council announced that it would defer any
decision until its meeting in March, while also signaling that it
would work with the new US administration in formulating a response.

At the same time, Trump will likely have a range of possible sanctions
available to him under CAATSA, and “The US is expected to tread
lightly,” says Tuvey.

“Given the fragile state of the Turkish economy, no one wants to see
it go into a tailspin,” adds Lesser.

For now, then, President Erdogan will likely avoid any major
sanctions. Indeed, the veteran Turkish leader has remained largely
unruffled by the threat.

“Any decision to impose sanctions against Turkey won’t be of great
concern to Turkey,” he told reporters ahead of the December EU Council
meeting.

On Friday, Erdogan doubled down, saying any US sanctions imposed over
its S-400 missile purchase would “disrespect” Turkey as a NATO ally.
Also on Friday, in a speech to his AK Party, he called on US and EU
politicians to “break from the influence of anti-Turkey lobbies.”

Yet, the clock is ticking on further action in both Brussels and
Washington, with the threat of punitive action still a powerful force
on its own, say analysts.

“The sanctions threat is a reminder,” says Tuvey, “of Turkey’s
economic fragility.”