CBA Raises Refinancing Interest Rate By 0.25% To 7.5%

CBA RAISES REFINANCING INTEREST RATE BY 0.25% TO 7.5%

Noyan Tapan

Au g 4, 2008

YEREVAN, AUGUST 4, NOYAN TAPAN. On August 4, 2008, the Central Bank
of Armenia (CBA) Board raised the refinancing interest rate by 0.25%,
fixing it at 7.5%.

According to the CBA PR Service, although a 2.2% fall in prices was
registered in July on June 2008, the 12-month inflation grew by almost
1% and made 10.7%.

The CBA Board confirmed that although international prices of some
foodstuffs continue to have a downward tendency registered in the
previous months, this tendency has not been reflected in domestic
prices. At the same time, despite the fact that international oil
prices somewhat fell since mid July, the uncertainty on further changes
in these prices remains. In this regard, the secondary impacts of
inflation’s potential have not weakened, and they continue to affect
prices of non-food commodities and tariffs of services.

Taking into account the high inflation rates and considering it
important to weaken inflationary expectations and reduce deviations
from the target, the CBA Board believes that further changes in the
refinancing interest rate will be depend on the speed and amount of
the response of domestic prices to the indicated tendencies regarding
commodity prices in international markets in the coming months.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=116255

Retired Blackburn Couple’s Armenian Adventure

RETIRED BLACKBURN COUPLE’S ARMENIAN ADVENTURE
By Catherine Pye

Lancashire Telegraph
s/3568707.Retired_Blackburn_couple_s_Armenian_adve nture/
Aug 4 2008
UK

A RETIRED couple are about to go on a trip of a lifetime to Armenia
to help underprivileged children.

David and Sue Andrew of Whitehall Road, Blackburn, are travelling to
Yerevan and Stepanavan for a week tomorrow (Wednesday), visiting the
Area Development Programme run by the charity World Vision.

They will be helping out at a summer school for children, and working
with local communities to improve food security and access to clean
water.

Sue, 64, a former home tutor and hospital teacher, said: "We’ve never
done anything like this before and never thought we would because my
husband has had two major heart operations in the last couple of years.

"It’s marvellous we can go and I’m very excited and nervous."

David, 69, a former lecturer at Blackburn College, said: "When
Communism fell and the Russians left in 1991, they took the industry
away with them.

"There is now about 50 per cent unemployment and electricity is
prohibitively expensive.

"There was a bad earthquake in 1988 and many of the buildings are
still in their collapsed state because there are no resources."

They are representing Leamington Road Baptist Church in Blackburn,
which they have attended since 1973.

The church has supported the project for the last three years, together
with 20 other churches across the country in a project called Churches
in Partnership (CHIP).

Five others who are going on the trip are from the North East,
Birmingham and High Wycombe.

They hope to learn about the needs in the country, and take their
experiences back to their churches where fundraising can take place.

Sue and David also hope to meet the seven-year-old boy they sponsor,
called Armen.

They will be taking him a Blackburn Rovers shirt, a cap and a football.

Sue added: "Everytime I go shopping I end up coming back with things
for Armenia.

"The children at our church have also been drawing pictures for us
to take to other children their age."

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/new

TBILISI: The Recent Summit Georgian Presidency GUAM: A New Chance Fo

THE RECENT SUMMIT GEORGIAN PRESIDENCY GUAM: A NEW CHANCE FOR REGIONAL PEACE INITIATIVES

Daily Georgian Times
Aug 4 2008
Georgia

The recent Summit of GUAM in Georgia has reiterated the wish of its
Member States – Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Moldova – to deal
with the still unresolved conflicts in the South Cau-casus. Moreover,
this collective diplomacy tool could make Georgia a regional leader,
by means of a pro-active approach to conflict resolution, including
cooperation with non-government ac-tors in international politics.

One of these – Universal Peace Federation, an international
world-wide NGO, which enjoys a consultative status with the UN ECOSOC,
recently launched its new South Caucasus Peace ini-tiative, aimed
at contributing, by using a ‘people’s diplomacy’, to the resolution
of one of the oldest conflicts in Eurasia, i.e. the one involving
Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Unfortunately, the region is overburdened with unresolved conflicts,
including the situation be-tween Georgia and Abkhazia, and others. So
why is Nagorny-Karabakh first?

The conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh is
the most significant obstacle to peace and stability in the South
Caucasus. The conflict began in 1988 due to Arme-nian territorial
claims for Nagorny-Karabakh, a territory populated by ethnic Armenians,
which was arbitrarily given to Azerbaijan by Bolshevik leaders in
Moscow in 1921.

Since 1992, Armenian Armed Forces have occupied 20% of Azerbaijan
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and its seven surrounding
districts. In 1994, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement
that ended active hostilities. 14 years into a ceasefire, the parties
have been unable to sign a single document bringing them closer to
a settlement.

Nagorno-Karabakh has aspirations for independence and argues
that it has a democratically-elected government that is meeting
the preconditions of statehood. However, it is internationally
recognized as part of Azerbaijan and is still highly dependant on
Armenia for its military security and economic survival. Azeris
do not participate in its political, economic, cultural, and social
institutions. Nagorny-Karabakh has mono-ethnic institutions and become
one of the world’s most militarized societies.

Deprived of the basic right to return to their homes, over half a
million Azeris displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent
districts have become highly dependent on the Azerbai-jani state,
without a clear sense of their future. Armenian and Azerbaijani public
opinion on how to resolve the conflict is as divided as ever.

For many historical, demographical, geographical, and economic
factors, Azeris and Armenians living in and around the conflict
zone are dependent on each other. Yet they are deeply divided by
mistrust. Demonization of the "other," rising military expenditures,
and increasing ceasefire violations are all ominous signs that time
for a peaceful settlement may be running out.

Oil money has given Azerbaijan new self-confidence and the means
to upgrade its armed forces. It seems to want to postpone any
peace deal until the military balance has shifted decisively
in its favor. Yerevan, which itself has done surprisingly well
economically, has also become more in-transigent and increased its
own military expenditures. It believes that time is on its side,
that Nagorno-Karabakh’s de facto independence will become a reality
increasingly difficult to ig-nore, especially after the independence
of Kosovo was proclaimed and widely recognizedï~@ª.

Unfortunately, political and diplomatic efforts to resolve the
conflict, including those within the framework of CIS, OSCE Minsk
contact group, and PACE Ad hoc Committee on Nagorny Ka-rabakh, fail
to bring positive results. In turn, those representing the Universal
Peace Federation, offer an approach, based on the principle, proposed
by great peacemaker Dr Martin Luther King, Jr.: "We get rid of an
enemy by getting rid of enmity."

South Caucasus Peace Initiative includes a comprehensive plan of
peace building and develop-ment, based on core human values and
universal moral principles. We believe that, by addressing the root
causes of conflict, embedded in people’s heart, we could build the
basis for building peace, harmony, and cooperation between cultures
and religions.

By planning international forums and conferences, humanitarian and
service projects, culture and education programs, etc. activities
within the region and in other countries, we count on joint ef-fort
by government and non-government organizations, various confessions,
and private busi-nesses. In this work we rely on our Peace Ambassadors,
a network of people of goodwill, de-voted to enthusiastic and volunteer
work for peace. The goals and objectives of these activities are
as follows:

â~@¢ To promote the concept of "Peace in Heart- Peace in Family –
Peace in Society – Peace on the Planet"

â~@¢ To concentrate public attention on the urgent need to take steps
towards the peaceful so-lution of the Nagorny Karabakh conflict

â~@¢ To set up sustainable and effective coalition of Ambassadors
for Peace and other people of goodwill, able to deal with the conflict

â~@¢ To facilitate dialogue between Armenia, Azerbaijan and Nagorny
Karabakh Republic, and to involve state bodies in peace efforts,
resulting in efficient mechanisms of commu-nication and negotiation

â~@¢ To establish international contacts with likewise public
associations and movements, in-volved in Nagorny Karabakh peace process

â~@¢ To consolidate isolated peace and service efforts, for the sake
of joint positive develop-ment around the Nagorny Karabakh

â~@¢ To consider the related issue of the blockade of the
Turkish-Armenian border, imposed in 1993

â~@¢ To contribute, by means of service and humanitarian assistance
projects, to human devel-opment and human security of the population
of Armenia and Azerbaijan, especially of those living in the conflict
zone, and of the displaced persons and refugees.

We hope that GUAM could become a major stakeholder of the South
Caucasus Peace Initiative. Others may include the Governments of
Armenia and Azerbaijan, especially offices of Commis-sioners for
Human Rights; Ambassadors for Peace and their related contacts,
representing Rus-sia, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, Turkey, Iran, etc. We
also count on AGAT – a forum of Azer-baijan, Georgia, Armenia, and
Turkey, proposed by Turkey to deal with the regional security and
cooperation; the Turkish-Armenian Council of Business Development;
Armenian and Azerbai-jani Diaspora in the US, Russia, France, etc.;
and other public associations and groups.

We believe that the Georgian Presidency of GUAM, which began recently,
is a unique opportu-nity for collective efforts in the region of
South Caucasus. Let us take this chance together to make peace!

Vladimir Petrovsky, President, Russian national peace council
2008.08.04 19:16

–Boundary_(ID_KYUvmLNHAhRRnOqdCJG75w)–

ANKARA: General Ilker Basbug To Overtake Turkish Army Chief Post, As

GENERAL ILKER BASBUG TO OVERTAKE TURKISH ARMY CHIEF POST, AS EXPECTED

Hurriyet
Aug 4 2008
Turkey

Turkey’s Supreme Military Council assigned Land Forces Commander
Gen. Ilker Basbug as the new army chief on Monday and he will overtake
the position from Gen. Yasar Buyukanit on August 30. (UPDATED)

Basbug will fill the post of General Staff Chief for two years,
reaching the retirement age limit in 2010, and will be replaced by
newly-appointed Land Forces Commander Gen. Isik Kosaner. Admiral
Metin Atac will continue to serve as the Commander of Naval Forces,
and Gen. Aydogan Babaoglu will continue to serve as Air Forces for
one year.

The new appointments on the top command line came at a critical time
as the governing Justice and Development Party (AKP) just survived
a closure case and faces growing pressure to address both domestic
and international issues.

This is the first meeting of the Supreme Military Council for some
time in which no military officer was discharged due to reactionary
or indisciplinary acts.

The relations between the military and the government are expected
to change as Basbug is seen a different commander to his predecessors.

He thinks it is important to have connections and to establish dialogue
with the government, as well as with other state organs. He also
does not get involved in any debates through the media, excluding
international issues.

The new appointments on the top command line came at a critical time as
the governing Justice and Development Party (AKP) just survived from
a closure case and faces growing pressure to address both domestic
and international issues.

The relations between the military and the government are expected
to continue in a different form as Basbug seen a different commander
than his predecessors.

He thinks it is important to have a connections and to establish
dialogue with the government, as well as with other state organs. He
also does not get involved in any debates through the media, excluding
international issues.

KEEPING ARMY OUT OF POLITICS

Basbug is expected to distance the Turkish Armed Forces from
politics. However, it would not be surprising to see him make harsh
statements in the case the red lines of the Turkish Armed Forces,
including the unitary structure of the republic and secularism,
are crossed during his term.

FIGHT AGAINST TERROR

Basbug is very experienced in the fight against terror, an issue he
sees as a priority, and is determined to continue the armed struggle
during his term. Turkey’s operations against the PKK continue, and
the Turkish army will undertake similar operations with determination
until reaching an absolute outcome, he had earlier said.

He is also expected to pay a comprehensive visit to the Turkey’s
terror-hit southeast region to show that he gives much importance to
the issue.

REACTIONARY MOVEMENTS

Basbug sees an ongoing, planned and tireless effort to fray the
revolutionary reforms of Ataturk, founder of modern Turkey, and
thinks reactionary movements that threaten the republic have started
to become a cause for concern.

"It is the mission of "everyone who feels he is a member of Turkish
nation" to claim and protect the republic’s basic characteristics
of democracy, secularism, social and rule of law. The Turkish Armed
Forces has always been a party for protecting this body and these
characteristics and will continue to be so… It is a reactionary
attitude to act in a manner against the Turkish revolution… I need
to confess with deep sorrow that the reactionary threat has reached a
point of concern, it is even not accepted by some segment of society,"
Basbug said in the speech he delivered at the Military Academy in 2007.

CALLS FOR COMMON SENSE

Basbug usually adopts an approach to urge for common sense in periods
of high-tension. Recently he held a tet-a-tet meeting with Turkish
Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan when the tension over the case before
the courts reached a peak and called on the media not to pressure
the judiciary. He also called for common sense during Turkey’s ground
operation against the PKK in northern Iraq in February.

U.S. PERSPECTIVE

Basbug desires that relations with the United States should be in a
form that protects Turkey’s interests. He has criticized the U.S. in
the past over its slow reaction to incidents relating to the outlawed
PKK; however recent progress between Turkey and the U.S. on this
issue has given him a more positive outlook.

He also prefers relations with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani and
Massoud Barzani, the leader of the Kurdish administration in northern
Iraq, be held within a more controlled framework.

REACTIVE AGAINST EU IF NEEDED

Basbug is also expected to maintain his stance towards the European
Union and not hesitate to show his reactions at times he deems
necessary.

NO CONSESSIONS FOR ATHENS

Basbug is not expected to offer any concessions or show a softening in
regard to relations with Greece. Basbug is likely to stick Turkey’s
formal declaration that any attempt by Greece to increase the
territorial waters to 12 miles would be ‘casus belli’. He also is not
expected to support speedy action in regard in relations with Armenia.

BACKGROUND

Basbug, 65, was born in Turkey’s southwestern province of
Afyonkarahisar and is married with two children. He served as an
infantry officer and is experienced in international diplomacy. He
speaks English since he worked in the foreign representatives of
Turkey for more than six years. He is known to be a prolific reader
and closely monitors the world press daily.

Islamists And Secularists Vying For Turkey’s Past As Well As Its Fut

ISLAMISTS AND SECULARISTS VYING FOR TURKEY’S PAST AS WELL AS ITS FUTURE
By Gareth Jenkins

Eurasia Daily Monitor
Aug 4 2008
DC

On July 31 Turkish President Abdullah Gul formally ratified the
appointment of Professor Ali Birinci (born in 1947) as head of the
state-run Turkish Historical Association (TTK) to replace the incumbent
Professor Yusuf Halacoglu (born 1949), who had held the position from
1993 until his dismissal on July 23.

In recent years, the long-running struggle between the government
of the moderate Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) and
Turkey’s secular establishment has tended only to attract international
attention when there has been a major public confrontation, such as the
AKP’s ultimately successful attempt to appoint Gul to the presidency
in 2007 and, more recently, the closure case against the AKP itself
(see EDM, July 31).

Such major confrontations are important indicators of a continuing
shift in power in Turkey. In the long-run, however, the more decisive
struggle is probably occurring on the margins of the political process,
as the AKP gradually entrenches both its supporters and its ideology
in the state apparatus, by means such as the appointment of its
supporters to key positions in the bureaucracy.

The TTK was established by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (1881-1938),
who founded the modern Turkish Republic in 1923 from the rump
of the Ottoman Empire following the latter’s defeat in World War
I. Ataturk sought to create a Turkish nation state. At the time,
outside the empire’s tiny educated elite, there was little sense,
or even awareness, of a "national identity." Under the Ottomans,
the primary determinant of identity had been religion, which for
the majority of the population meant Islam. Ataturk associated the
Ottoman Empire with obscurantism and regarded Islam as one of the most
important reasons for its failure to match the pace of technological
and intellectual development in the West. The TTK’s main purpose was
to create an historical pedigree for a new secular nation-state, which
would be based on language and race. The TTK wrote a new history, in
which the Turks’ origins were projected back beyond the Ottoman Empire
to the nomads of Central Asia. Over the years that have followed,
the TTK has remained the custodian of official Turkish history and
one of the main ideological bastions of the secular state.

The attitude of the secular establishment to the Ottoman Empire
can be seen clearly on the website of the Turkish military, which
has always regarded itself as the guardian of Ataturk’s legacy,
known as Kemalism. Although the Ottoman Empire lasted for 600 years,
only one of the 13 "Important Days in Turkish History" listed on the
website of the Turkish General Staff is from before World War One
(for reasons that remain obscure, the day is the anniversary of the
conquest of the island of Rhodes). The majority are associated with
Ataturk’s life (Turkish General Staff website, ).

In contrast, Turkey’s Islamists have always been unabashed Ottoman
nostalgists. Although it has not yet dared to confront the personality
cult that grew up around Ataturk after his death, including the
compulsory inculcation of his teachings at every level of the
educational system, the AKP has certainly been less vigorous than
previous administrations in terms of promoting it.

In recent years, there has also been a noticeable shift in the
historical reference points in official statements, ceremonies
and speeches. Before the AKP came to power, the reference point was
invariably a quotation from Ataturk or an event from his life. Now it
is increasingly the Ottoman Empire. The change has been most marked
at the local level. For example, ever since pro-Islamic political
parties first took control of the Istanbul Municipality in 1994,
the Ottoman conquest of the city in 1453 has been celebrated with
increasing enthusiasm each year. Conferences and symposia on Ottoman
themes have proliferated, and large budgets been assigned to the
preservation and restoration of the city’s Ottoman, particularly
religious, architectural heritage. Tulip festivals, including the
planting of three million bulbs across the city, are now held each
spring to commemorate the "Tulip Era" of the early 18th century. The
municipality has even begun to use Ottoman vocabulary and grammatical
constructions on billboards.

This Ottoman nostalgia has always been extremely strong among
followers of the Islamic preacher Fethullah Gulen (born in 1941),
who is currently in exile in the United States. Gulen has long
portrayed the Ottoman Empire as a paradigm of religious tolerance
and social harmony, although the historical record would appear to
indicate otherwise. Over the last decade, the Gulen movement has grown
rapidly to become the most powerful non-governmental network in Turkey,
which includes media outlets, schools, universities, businesses and
charitable foundations. It has also established increasingly close
ties with the AKP. Several ministers and many AKP parliamentary
deputies are known to be Gulen sympathizers.

Although he had often courted controversy through his aggressive
denial that the treatment of the Armenians in the late Ottoman
Empire constituted genocide, Halacoglu was undoubtedly committed to
Ataturk’s ideological legacy. In contrast, Ali Birinci is known to
be very close to the Gulen movement and has played an active role
in several of its NGOs. He first came to prominence in 2006 when he
publicly supported another pro-AKP academic, Professor Atilla Yayla,
who described Kemalism as taking Turkey "much further backward than
forward" and, in a reference to the Ataturk personality cult, asked
"why are there pictures of this man everywhere?" (Vatan, July 25).

As a result, the replacement of Halacoglu with Birinci will undoubtedly
be regarded by many secularists in Turkey not merely as a bureaucratic
appointment but as another indication of creeping regime change.

www.tsk.mil.tr

Boxing: Darchinyan Scales Boxing’s Dizzying Heights

DARCHINYAN SCALES BOXING’S DIZZYING HEIGHTS
Brad Walter

Blacktown Sun
Aug 4 2008
Australia

AFTER becoming only the second Australian boxer, behind Jeff Fenech,
to win world titles in more than one weight division, Vic Darchinyan
wants more.

The Armenian-born, Sydney-based southpaw plans to unify the
super-flyweight belts after stopping Russian champion Dimitri Kirilov
in the fifth round of their IBF world title bout in Washington at
the weekend.

Darchinyan, who six times defended the IBF flyweight title he won in
2004 before losing to Filipino Nonito Donaire last July, also wants
to move up to a heavier division and claim another belt.

The 32-year-old former Olympian’s performance, in which he became
the first boxer to stop Kirilov, has earned Darchinyan the Herald
‘s performer of the week award, presented by Colonial First State.

Ahead 40-36 on all three official scorecards after the opening four
rounds, Darchinyan showed that his pre-fight vow to KO Kirilov was
more than just talk when he dropped the Russian with a left hook and
then moved for the kill when he got to his feet.

A second left put a bloodied Kirilov on his back under the ropes, and
referee Earl Brown counted him out, giving Darchinyan his 30th win –
and the 24th by knockout – in 32 fights since turning professional.

"I trained hard," Darchinyan said. "One year ago, I lost my IBF
flyweight world title belt. After that, my son was born. I want to
give this new IBF world title belt to him. Thank you Ruben, this is
for you."

While Darchinyan has campaigned for a rematch with Donaire in a bid
to avenge his only defeat, he now wants a bout with WBC/WBA world
super-flyweight champion Cristian Mijares from Mexico.

Every Tuesday, the Herald Sport team will announce our most outstanding
performer of the week. The winner could be any Australian team or
individual from a major sport. Readers will select the performers of
the year by voting online in November. Until then, give your feedback
or selections each week on smh.com.au.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Rocking The Boat

ROCKING THE BOAT
by Arpi Harutyunyan

Transitions Online
Aug 4 2008
Czech Republic

Armenia’s new prime minister vows to combat graft and overhaul the
government. But changes won’t come easily.

YEREVAN | Environmentalists campaigned fervently against plans to open
a large tract of relatively untouched forest land to strip mining,
only to watch the Armenian National Assembly approve the deal anyway.

This spring, as the snows in the mountainous north began to melt and
work started at the Teghut mine, a coalition of conservation groups
renewed their push to have the government reconsider the approval
of what they contend will cause irreversible damage to the nation’s
dwindling forestland.

More accustomed to setbacks than progress in dealing with political
leaders in Yerevan, environmentalists got a shock when the country’s
new prime minister, Tigran Sargsyan, not only agreed to discuss their
concerns, but seemed to cozy up to their arguments.

Prime Minister Sargsyan, center. Photo by Anahit Hayrapetyan.

"We can’t damage nature, because it’ll cost our state and the people
much more to repay," Sargsyan told a group of conservationists on
20 June. "And clearly, we need to take that into account from the
very beginning and make balanced decisions. We need not be seduced by
industry’s statistics alone, but realize the importance of providing
a proper living environment for people."

Environmentalists hailed as unprecedented the prime minister’s
decision to meet face-to-face and to openly discuss the government’s
controversial approval – even if the mining operations in northern
Armenia’s Teghut forest continue.

"This was the first serious meeting with a high-ranking official
like the prime minister within the last 15 to 20 years," said Hakob
Sanasaryan, chairman of the Greens’ Union. "But the outcome of the
meeting showed the discussion in fact was a formality. Maybe he will
carry out serious reforms in other spheres, but not Teghut, I think."

A NEW STYLE OF LEADER

Formality or not, the meeting is one sign that the prime minister, who
has been in office less than six months, is trying to change Armenian
politics. With a reputation for corruption, divisive politics, and
a political culture wedded in favoritism, the country has a long way
to go. But the former Central Bank chairman has been talking change –
and has already ruffled some feathers in the process.

Since taking office after an explosive political spring, Sargsyan
met lawmakers discouraged by the deadly crackdown on demonstrators
who claimed that the dominant Republican Party stole the February
presidential election. He is also setting standards almost unheard
of among public officials in Armenia – punctuality, competence and
openness.

Tatul Manaseryan, an economics professor at Yerevan State University
and a former independent member of the National Assembly, believes
the prime minister is trying to shake up the system and rattles off
a long list of changes.

"The PM has started important reforms from his office: the work
day starts at 9 a.m., the government sessions are as transparent as
possible, he demands computer and other kinds of literacy from the
ministers, organizes regularly scheduled meetings with citizens and
actively responds to the questions raised, made a call for cooperation
to the opposition and participated and spoke at the opposition
congress, set a compulsory requirement for the ministries to work
with non-governmental organizations, and so on," Manaseryan said.

Indeed, Sargsyan has been unafraid to criticize corruption, bribery,
smuggling, and other problems – charges often made by monitoring
organizations and citizens, but rarely from the mouths of senior
politicians.

"The number one problem in the Republic of Armenia is not the problem
of democracy, nor the lack of freedom of expression," Sargsyan recently
told the National Assembly. "The number one problem is the corruption
that hinders all our reforms. If we don’t manage to create equal
conditions of competition for economic entities, there won’t be any
democracy in Armenia. That is the basis and corruption is our number
one enemy."

In an effort to combat corruption and improve the tax system in this
close-knit nation of 3 million people, the prime minister announced
on 19 June the creation of a council to monitor the customs service
and tax collections. He also set up telephone hot line to record
feedback and complaints.

DIFFICULT HURDLES AHEAD

Sargsyan has promised to openly discuss these problems and make public
cases when public servants are punished for breaching the rules.

"We have thousands of corrupt people and the problem is that even when
we replace them with others, we have no guarantees the newcomers will
not continue the tradition," he told an anti-corruption committee
on 26 June. "We have 2,000 tax collectors in the tax agency, and
200,000 more dreaming of taking the position not because they are
ready to honestly serve the country, but because they see it as an
easy opportunity to get rich."

Whether Sargsyan can overcome entrenched interests and succeed is open
to speculation. "It will take several months to reveal whether the
middle and minor corrupt officials, or the ‘sharks,’ have been made
accountable," Manaseryan said. "It is still too early to make judgments
whether the open and transparent work style will be compulsory for all,
or just the PM and the colleagues obedient to his call. But I see no
grounds to mistrust the newly appointed officials. At the same time I
believe the atmosphere in which those promises were given will create
more obstacles than favorable conditions for reforms."

Although Sargsyan is not aligned with a party, he calls the
shots in parliament. The Republican Party controls 64 of the 131
National Assembly seats, and draws support from smaller political
groups. Sargsyan’s anti-graft campaign plays into the hands of the
opposition, which for years has accused the leading party of arrogance
and fostering corruption. After stormy parliamentary elections in 2007
and a bitter presidential contest earlier this year, the premier’s
polices may appeal to a disillusioned public thirsty for change.

President Serzh Sargsyan appointed Tigran Sargsyan prime minister on
9 April. (The men are not related.) The new premier is a graduate
of the Yerevan State Institute of National Economy, and studied at
the N. A.Voznesensky Financial-Economic Institute in Leningrad, now
St. Petersburg. He’s also been trained at Georgetown University’s
International Law Institute in Washington.

After serving in various government posts when Armenia gained
independence in 1991, Sargsyan served as chairman of the Armenian
Bankers’ Association before moving to the Central Bank in 1997.

At 48, the guitar-playing father of three is a member of the Armenian
Orthodox Church and is well known around the capital. During the
blazing heat of Yerevan’s summer, Sargsyan and his family are often
seen at swimming pools in town.

REPUTATION HONED IN FINANCE

Sargsyan developed a reputation as a reformer while at the Central
Bank, and won praise from international institutions for helping
the country emerge from the dire economic conditions it endured
after the collapse of the Soviet Union and its turf war with
Azerbaijan. Armenia’s economic fortunes have improved markedly in
the past decade, including a decline in poverty and sharp rise in
growth, but the World Bank and monitoring agencies say corruption
and bureaucratic inefficiency continue to be a drag on the country’s
potential.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the International Monetary
Fund, was among the first to congratulate Sargsyan when he became prime
minister. "Numerous very important reforms were realized within your
10-year chairmanship of the Central Bank, including the alleviation of
inflation, introduction of an effective system of bank supervision,
and development of anti-laundering legislation." Strauss-Kahn also
praised Sargsyan’s "particular commitment to the continuity of reforms
and intelligent governance."

But not everyone is so glowing. Levon Ter-Petrosian, a former president
who lost to Serzh Sargsyan in the February election, recently told
an opposition rally that as Central Bank chairman, Tigran Sargsyan
cost the country dearly when he sold gold reserves for $17 million
when prices were low.

"This is absurdity in all aspects," he told the rally. "Gold is the
most liquid asset. States sell gold in serious situations when famine,
war, natural disasters and other things threaten the country. What
stupid man on earth would sell gold, when there are no such threats?"

Beyond combating corruption, the prime minister has vowed to improve
the quality of public service, which in many offices still suffers
from a Soviet-era work ethic.

"Our citizens’ major complaints with the state here is that the state
provides bad quality, untimely services and creates problems for them,"
Sargsyan told the National Assembly. "As a result we have serious
complaints and mistrust in the government. The order given to all
ministries and agencies was the following: ‘Together we have to catalog
the services provided to our citizens and monitor their quality.’ "

Sargsyan also wants overhaul the passport and visa agency. The
government gets dozens of complaints about the agency from citizens
and the country’s large diaspora returning for work and holidays.

"Obviously, we have serious problem in this sphere. It’s corruption –
when the service is delivered in the name of the state, but money is
extorted by a set price list," the prime minister said.

BURIED IN GRAFT

Sargsyan appears intent to tackle the graft that is inescapable
in Armenia, even in death. "The corruption [in cemeteries] simply
flourishes. If you want a proper burial plot, a big place, money will
solve the problem. And the cynicism has reached its height and nothing
keeps people back," the prime minister said in a speech on 26 June.

"Last week, we took part in the funeral of one of our chess
grandmasters. He was a renowned, talented chess player; the chairman
of the chess federation is the president of the republic, I am the
deputy chair, which means that everyone was well aware we were in close
contact with that talented chess player. However, no one appeared to
be constrained from taking a bribe of $2,000 to provide a place in
the cemetery."

Changing this system could take time and not everyone is convinced
Sargsyan can succeed.

"Tigran Sargsyan seems a well-bred, smart person at first sight,"
said Gayane Ohanyan, 48, a resident of Yerevan. "He is well educated,
has a lot of work experience. But it is unbelievable [that he can]
make significant reforms in a corrupt system like this, especially
as the officials are the bearers of the system of traditions."

Yerevan State’s Manaseryan says Sargsyan’s reform plans will take time,
but are feasible. "The process of getting rid of weeds is never short."

BAKU: Turkey Supports Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Peace Settlement Wit

TURKEY SUPPORTS NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT PEACE SETTLEMENT WITH MINSK GROUP’S MEDIATION: TURKEY’S FOREIGN MINISTER

Trend News Agency
Aug 4 2008
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, 4 August /Trend News corr. S.Ilhamgizi/ Turkey’s
Foreign Minister Ali Babajan stated his country supports the mediation
of Minsk Group on settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

"We support peace settlement with the co-chairmanship of the United
States, Russia and France," Babajan said at a press conference in
Ankara on 4 August.

Babajan did not answer whether ongoing occupation of Azerbaijani
territory by Armenia would affect Turkey’s admission to the European
Union. He mentioned there is another format of settlement of the
conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, i.e. Minsk Group’s work.

Minister said Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and Armenia’s Serzh
Sargsyan negotiated in June. Babajan hoped for progress to result
from the negotiations.

"Demographic structure of the region and the events which has taken
place in recent five-ten years must be taken into account during
settling of the conflict. We support peace settlement of the Karabakh
conflict with the mediation of the Minsk Group and hope the countries
will achieve an agreement," said Babajan.

BAKU: Khazar Ibrahim: "Matthew Bryza Refutes What He Said A Day Befo

KHAZAR IBRAHIM: "MATTHEW BRYZA REFUTES WHAT HE SAID A DAY BEFORE"

Azeri Press Agency
Aug 4 2008
Azerbaijan

Baku. Tamara Grigoryeva – APA. "If you pay attention to Matthew Bryza’s
statements, you will see that he either refutes them the next day,
or expresses quite different views. That’s why I do not want to
comment on Bryza’s recent statement", Spokesman fro Azerbaijan’s
Foreign Ministry Khazar Ibrahim said while taking a stance on the
statement of OSCE Minsk American Co-Chair Matthew Bryza in Moscow, APA
reports. Khazar Ibrahim lined up the issues on the table as follows:
the conflict will be solved stage-by-stage, units of Armenian army will
be withdrawn from Azerbaijani territories, all internally displaced
people (IDP) of Azerbaijan will return to their native lands and
Nagorno Karabkh’s status will be determined within the framework of
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity only after the communities have
normal relations. The diplomat said the importance of the negotiations
was that the process continued, but any progress was out of discussion.

"If there was any improvement, we could speak about new situation",
he said.

Matthew Bryza said in Moscow that the negotiations between Armenia and
Azerbaijan covered liberation of the regions around Nagorno Karabakh,
deployment of peacekeeping forces in the region and referendum
concerning Nagorno Karabakh’s status.

ANKARA: Karabakh Talks In Moscow Seen As Positive

KARABAKH TALKS IN MOSCOW SEEN AS POSITIVE

Hurriyet
Aug 4 2008
Turkey

The foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan struck a positive
tone and pledged to keep talking about a possible peace deal for the
frozen conflict of Nagorno-Karabakh after they met for talks in Moscow,
a Russian newspaper reported on Monday.

Friday’s meeting had proved useful and consultations should be
continued in a similar format, Armenian Foreign Minister Edward
Nalbandian was quoted by The Moscow Times.

Nalbandian added there is a chance of him reconvening with his Azerian
counterpart at the next U.N. General Assembly session. "There are
sensitive issues, they should be handled cautiously. We are trying
to create an adequate environment for negotiations to continue,"
he was quoted by Interfax news agency.

"If we feel we have found a common platform, then nothing is
impossible," Azeri Foreign Minister Elmar Mamedyarov said.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the outcome of the occupation of
Azerbaijani territories by Armenia, stands as the principal obstacle to
the political stability, economic development and regional cooperation
in the Southern Caucasus. The conflict is also responsible for the
deplorable situation of the nearly one million refugees and internally
displaced persons in Azerbaijan.

Nagorno-Karabakh residents will decide for themselves whether the
republic will be under Azeri control or be independent, U.S. Assistant
Secretary of State and co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group Matthew
Bryza said after the meeting.

A referendum on Nagorno Karabakh’s status is possible in 15-20 years,
Novruz Mammadov, head of the international relations department at
the Azeri presidential administration said.

"These processes may become possible only after the return of Azeri
refugees and displaced persons," he added.

The Minsk Group of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe is a body co-headed by Russia, the United States and France
and appointed to mediate in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Turkey expressed on Monday it hopes that the parties could reach a
consensus on the issue, but rejected the proposal for a referendum.

As a member of the Minsk Group, Turkey considers the Minsk Process as
a useful mechanism to reach a peaceful, lasting and just settlement
in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which constitutes the key foreign
policy issue for Azerbaijan. Turkey believes that the international
community should actively engage in efforts geared towards creating
a favorable environment conducive to overcoming the existing stalemate.