Parlaimentary Candidate From Prospering Armenia Urges His Rivals To

PARLAIMENTARY CANDIDATE FROM PROSPERING ARMENIA URGES HIS RIVALS TO SIGN A MEMORANDUM ON CONDUCT OF FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS

Arminfo
2007-04-02 17:49:00

There are all prerequisites to conduct of free and fair election
in Armenia.

All we need is just good will, Hayrapet Hayrapetyan, the parliamentary
candidate from the Prospering Armenia party said during a
press-conference in the Urbat club today.

He pointed out that he is ready to show good will and to do his best
to ensure fair ballot in his district. For this purpose, he urges
his rivals in the 4th single-mandate district (Arabkir community,
Yerevan) to sign a memorandum on conducting free and fair election. "I
think that such a memorandum will restore people’s confidence in
elections. I don’t want the parliamentary race in my district to be
like the gladiators’ fights. I want it to be a civilized, political
struggle. All my rivals are worthy candidates and I will personally
congratulate the winner," Hayrapetyan said.

If elected, Hayrapetyan is going to actively engage in the parliament’s
work.

Regarding Prospering Armenia, Hayrapetyan said that the rating of
the party is steadily growing.

To note, Hayrapetyan’s rivals in the 4th district are Sargis
Muradkhanyan from National Unity, Suren Mamikonyan from Orinats
Yerkir, Hrayr Karapetyan from ARFD and Aram Manukyan from Armenian
Pan-national Movement.

Armenian Delegation Discusses Restoration Of Ancient City Of Ani In

ARMENIAN DELEGATION DISCUSSES RESTORATION OF ANCIENT CITY OF ANI IN TURKEY

Arminfo
2007-04-02 18:26:00

"We should establish contacts with the Turkish side and learn to trust
each other," Armenian Deputy Minister of Culture and Youth Gagik
Gyurjyan said at a press-conference in Yerevan, Monday. To remind,
G.Gyurjyan led the Armenian delegation which participated in the
opening ceremony of the Sourb Khach (St.Cross) Church in Lake Van,
West Armenia (modern Turkey).

He noted that the trip was fruitful. During private conversations
with representatives of the Turkish authorities, the Armenian side
raised the issue of restoring the ancient Armenian city of Ani. The
head of the delegation expressed hope that the next meeting of the
sides will be held for this purpose.

"The restoration of the Sourb Khach Church has been carried out at a
high level and complies with international standards, on the whole,"
G.Gyurjyan said.

He expressed regret at the fact that the issue of placing a
cross on the dome of the church was discussed more than the
restoration itself. "As for the Turkish flag hung out during the
opening ceremony, it should be noted that it is stipulated by the
legislation of this country while holding all the official events,"
he emphasized. Answering the journalists’ question whether the
restoration of the Sourb Khach Church is a PR action made by the
Turkish Government, G.Gyurjyan pointed out that he welcomes any action
aimed at restoring an architectural monument, moreover, an Armenian
monument. "One shouldn’t demand too much of Turkey at the current
stage," he said in conclusion.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Oligarchic Capitalism Prevents Development Of Small And Medium-Sized

OLIGARCHIC CAPITALISM PREVENTS DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESS IN ARMENIA: EXPERTS OF EURASIA FOUNDATION

Arminfo
2007-04-02 17:28:00

Oligarchic capitalism prevents the development of small and
medium-sized business in Armenia, the experts of the Eurasia
Foundation say. They have come to such conclusion as a result of a
survey conducted within the frameworks of a program on alternative
dispute resolution.

The director of the Union of Constructors of Armenia, Gurgen Minassyan,
says that the program was aimed at finding alternative to resolution
of commercial disputes at court. Most of commercial disputes inside
construction companies concern moral problems, non-compliance with
contractual obligations or incorrect profitability estimates.

None of the respondents expressed willingness to resolve such
disputes at court. A total 94.2% of them gave preference to third
person intermediation and 5.8% said that the only way out is force.

As a result of the program, 40 construction companies, jointly with
the Union of Constructors of Armenia, drafted and adopted a corporate
ethics convention and commercial dispute resolution rules.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Supplementary Benefits

SUPPLEMENTARY BENEFITS
Mark Gould

The Guardian
Tuesday April 3, 2007

Ministers have praised part-time extra schools … but praise doesn’t
pay the bills, say their organisers

It’s a bright Sunday morning in Enfield, north London, and the choir,
whose average age is about eight, is practising Canak-kale, a sad
Turkish song about the pointless slaughter of young men on both sides
during the Gallipoli campaign in the first world war.

This is Enfield Turkish school – a supplementary school that meets
at weekends and evenings at Albany school, a slightly bedraggled,
but vibrant 1970s secondary.

Over 400 pupils are learning about Turkish culture, language and
history, and supplementing their mainstream education from Sats up to
A-level, with impressive results. Last year pupils achieved an 81% pass
rate in maths, English and science GCSEs, of which 63% were grade A.
Enfield is one of 5,000 supplementary schools across the UK, run by
vo lunteers and subsisting on donations, grants and sponsorship from
foreign governments. The schools represent almost every ethnic group
in the UK, including African-Caribbean, Afghan, Somali, Greek, Jewish,
Turkish, Russian, Ukrainian and Iranian.

Until now their achievements on shoestring budgets went unsung. But
in January, the schools minister Andrew Adonis announced the creation
of a new national resource centre for supplementary education, funded
by the Department for Education and Skills and with a £150,000 grant
from the Paul Hamlyn Foundation.

Adonis praised supplementary schools for driving up national
educational standards and promoting pupils’ British and ethnic
identities. "A national survey found that eight out of 10 pupils
who attended a supplementary school said it helped them with their
mainstream school work," he said.

The centre will act as a resource and support for supplementary
schools, offer help to those establishing new schools, and celebrate
the work they do.

It will develop a quality framework and code of practice and
accreditation for school leaders and tutors. It also wants to create
a national network of supplementary schools; to campaign for better
funding; to encourage mainstream and supplementary schools into closer
partnership; and to encourage local authorities to provide more support

But Suleyman Soydag, the chairman of the Enfield Turkish school,
who is also a teacher, wants hard cash. He says LEAs bask in the exam
results glory of supplementary schools, while also making money out
of school premises. It is a struggle, he says, to find the £17,000 a
year needed to rent the hall, the classrooms, computers and printing
materials, and the additional hours for the school caretaker.

He puts his hand out, palm up. "We are always begging for donations –
our work goes into providing good Ofsted reports for their schools,
so we must have something back from local authorities."

His local MP, Joan Ryan, has launched a campaign to raise awareness
among ministers of these schools’ achievements and their financial
struggles. She has sent Adonis and the Treasury a dossier highlighting
the struggle of Enfield and other supplementary schools that both
improve educational achievement and promote social cohesion.

It’s break time in the main hall at Albany school, where the Turkish
school has set up a large gilded bust of Kemal Ataturk, the founder
of modern Turkey.

All around, a blur of children in scarlet sweatshirts are running,
gossiping and playing. As well as the pupils and teachers, there are
dozens of parents and helpers, some serving food, others collecting
fees.

Soydag is at pains to emphasise that the school opens its doors
to Kurdish families – some of the most marginalised groups within
an already marginalised community. And he stresses: "When we study
Turkish history, we refer to ‘the enemy’, we never say it was the
Greeks, English, Armenians. "

Ryan explains that another benefit of supplementary schools is
social inclusion for parents. "Lots of Turkish people feel isolated,
but coming here brings them into contact with the school. A study in
Birmingham showed that involvement in supplementary schools increased
parental involvement in mainstream school from 17% to 93%."

Ryan wants to pull together academic and other evidence from
supplementary schools across the country to support the case for more
national funding.

Soydag is more bullish. He says pupils are taught national curriculum
subjects and he is not afraid to open his doors to Ofsted.

Hatice, aged 14, has been coming to the school for three years. She
is learning Turkish for GCSE and hopes to go on to A-level. "Its good
to have a second or third language when you’re looking for a job."

Enfield council and Albany school, which set the rental prices, say
they are doing all they can to help. The LEA has already subsidised the
Turkish school to the tune of £6,242. In a joint statement, they say:
"The Turkish school gets the most favourable rates of any group that
hires Albany school. The normal cost of hire for the school would be
£38,000, but this has been reduced to £17,000. The school makes no
money out of this hire. If the rate was reduced further the school
would be out of pocket, which would be unacceptable."

Mario Kosnirak, a science teacher at a school in Solihull, is part
of the management team of Coventry Ukrainian school, which has been
running for 51 years. He welcomes the new national resource centre,
and says the school struggles to get by on donations and volunteer
teachers, paid £3 an hour.

The school runs for three hours on Saturday mornings, teaching
history, literature, geography and language out of the Ukrainian
community hall, but brings in children from Northampton, Leicester and
Wolverhampton. It charges parents £3 a week. There are currently 35
pupils, aged from three to 18, but the roll has been as high as 70. In
the past it taught Ukrainian up to GCSE, but since the exam has been
dropped by UK examining boards, it offers a certificate of attainment.

The Turkish and Turkish Cypriot governments send teachers to
supplementary schools in the UK, but, Kosnirak says, there is just
token support from the Ukraine.

"We are ambassadors for the Ukraine in this country and we have visited
the places our families come from, and we send support to some of the
areas of worst poverty. The Ukrainian ambassador has visited us and
told us he is very impressed, but all we have had is a few language
books so far."

Angela Knight is the coordinator of the Community Learning and
Support school which, for the past 24 years, has run Saturday classes
for Caribbean and mixed-race children in Coventry. She feels both
government and local authorities need to do more. "We are supplementing
what they do in mainstream schools.

Our teachers are all full-time teachers giving up their Saturdays
for free, and we don’t charge parents."

The school has 28 pupils, aged from nine to 13, on its books, but,
Knight says, the number goes up closer to exam time when pupils
doing GCSEs "want a little more help" – another reason she cites for
more support from mainstream education. "Coventry has been slow in
helping. Schools in Bristol, Leicester and Birmingham have had a lot
more support."

–Boundary_(ID_fAAQsmgf35lF7N5kT21 8eQ)–

Karabakh Defence Chief Interviewed Over Possible Appointment As Arme

KARABAKH DEFENCE CHIEF INTERVIEWED OVER POSSIBLE APPOINTMENT AS ARMENIAN MINISTER

Haykakan Zhamanak, Yerevan
31 Mar 07 p 3

Text of Kristine Khanumyan’s report in Armenian newspaper Haykakan
Zhamanak on 31 March headlined "I am ready to serve in any post"

An interview with the NKR [Nagornyy Karabakh republic] defence
minister, Seyran Ohanyan. He comments on rumours about his possible
appointment to the post of Armenian defence minister.

[Haykakan Zhamanak correspondent] Could you comment on the rumours
that you may be appointed Armenian defence minister?

[Seyran Ohanyan] I told your newspaper about two years ago that I am a
serviceman and ready to serve in any post not only at the top but also
in a lower one depending on our military and political situation in
order to improve this sector and the situation. As for the rumours, to
be honest, I am flattered but not aware of them. I have just returned
from military exercises and I don’t have time to think over this issue.

[Correspondent] Does that mean you have not received an official offer?

[Ohanyan] Yes, it does.

[Correspondent] In that case why are they mentioning just your name?

[Ohanyan] You know, since my first military post as lieutenant and
the commander of a squadron and till today when I am the NKR defence
minister I have never asked anybody for any post. They always watched
my work, assessed it and appointed to the post.

[Correspondent] You are known in Karabakh as a man striving to be far
from politics. Don’t you think that your appointment to the post will
be politicized?

[Ohanyan] How?

[Correspondent] Taking into account the fact that [Armenian President]
Robert Kocharyan and [Defence Minister] Serzh Sarkisyan are from
Karabakh.

[Ohanyan] I cannot say that. I am a serviceman and I have my own
duties. I cannot say I am not dealing with politics at all. I am
dealing with public activity regarding patriotic education, not
politics, and I think that is my job, the job of a serviceman.

[Correspondent] What kind of relations do you have with generals
of Armenia?

[Ohanyan] Normal. By generals do you mean Armenian generals of the
Armenian army?

[Correspondent] Yes, I do.

[Ohanyan] All of them are respected people, and I respect them.

[Correspondent] If you are appointed to the post of Armenian defence
minister, whom do you see in the post of NKR defence minister?

[Ohanyan] I do not know. I did not think about that.

[Correspondent] If you do not mention names.

[Ohanyan] I am saying once again that no post has been offered to
me. But, certainly, there are many people who can replace me. There
are people who have experience and who can serve even better than me
and organize military work better than me.

TV Reports Gunman Wounds Mayor Of Armenia’s 2nd Largest City, Kills

TV REPORTS GUNMAN WOUNDS MAYOR OF ARMENIA’S 2ND LARGEST CITY, KILLS BODYGUARDS

AP Worldstream
Published: Apr 02, 2007

Gunmen wounded the mayor of Armenia’s second largest city and killed
his driver and three bodyguards Monday, Armenian state TV reported.

The attack occurred around 10 p.m. (2000 GMT) on the highway between
the capital Yerevan, and Gyumri, a city of 150,000 located about 126
kilometers (80 miles) north of the capital, Yerkir-media TV said.

Vardan Gukasian was hospitalized in serious but stable condition, as
was his deputy. Gukasian’s driver and three bodyguards were killed,
the station reported.

The reports could not be immediately confirmed.

Politics are tense and occasionally violent in Armenia, a small,
impoverished ex-Soviet republic located in the strategic Caucasus
region.

In 1999, gunmen burst into parliament and killed the prime minister,
parliament speaker and six other officials and lawmakers. In 2005, the
mayor of a small town was arrested after he was accused of shooting
and killing the head of the local electric utility. The mayor was
later re-elected despite being jailed.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Former Russian Defence Minister, First Deputy PM Sergey Ivanov Profi

FORMER RUSSIAN DEFENCE MINISTER, FIRST DEPUTY PM SERGEY IVANOV PROFILED

Moskovskiy Komsomolets, Moscow
29 Mar 07

Text of article by Mikhail Rostovskiy: "The Russian Federation’s
Station Chief" by Russian newspaper Moskovskiy Komsomolets on 29 March

Will the "Lone Secret Service Man" become our third guarantor?

Sergey Ivanov will be able to celebrate the eighth anniversary of
his choice as Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin’s official successor this
November. In fall 1999, Yeltsin asked Prime Minister Putin, the former
secretary of the Security Council, to name his candidate for the empty
Security Council seat. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin chose FSB [Federal
Security Service] Deputy Director Ivanov. Will the same thing happen
with the presidency? It is possible that even Vladimir Vladimirovich
and Sergey Borisovich do not know at this time. We could bet a million
dollars without any hesitation, however, on the certainty that Ivanov
will play a key role in the "changing of the Kremlin guard in 2008."

If Putin is a card player and the entire political elite is a deck
of cards, then Ivanov is indisputably the joker – the "wild card"
that can pop up at any time and send the game careening in the most
unpredictable direction.

The Sphinx from Yasenevo

"I have been working with Sergey Borisovich for more than seven years,
but I cannot say I know him well. He is not the kind of man who opens
up right away." In this casual remark to me, a close colleague of
Ivanov’s concisely conveyed the essence of the first vice premier’s
character. Once known in the intelligence service as "The Quietest
One," Sergey Ivanov is one of those politicians who drive people
to distraction when they try to compose a political profile of
the man. As soon as you think you know something about him, that
"something" slips out of your grasp.

Ivanov cannot be called dull or indistinguishable, however. Sergey
Borisovich has always been distinguished, for example, by his unique
imagination and sense of humour. In the middle of the 1970s, Serezha
Ivanov, a graduate of the Philology Department of Leningrad State
University, once went out to find a taxi for some guests who had
lingered at his place until late at night. Cabs were in short supply
on Vasilyevskiy Island that night, but Ivanov was resourceful, so he
hailed … a street cleaner’s vehicle!

Sergey Borisovich is able to stay calm in a crisis. When the defence
minister was in London a couple of years ago, a fire alarm went
off in his hotel late at night. Everyone started to panic. To the
amusement of the few passersby, the hotel guests ran outside in
various stages of undress. Ivanov was one of the few who managed to
keep his dignity. He made his way outside in a leisurely fashion,
dressed in a fluffy white bathrobe.

The first vice premier is exceptionally charming when people meet him
in person. Like Putin, he can charm anyone in a small group. When
Sergey Borisovich was the minister of defence, his assistants
frequently had to listen to comments like this one: "Your boss is
wonderful. It is too bad all of you are such idiots!"

Ivanov is no stranger to common human weaknesses. The first vice
premier is an inveterate smoker, but he is quite ashamed of this
habit. Photographers and TV cameramen are always begged not to take
pictures of Sergey Borisovich with a cigarette.

Sergey Ivanov is extremely proud of his English language skills.

During official meetings, he embarrasses protocol officers with his
frequent need to correct the interpreters. Ivanov’s security guards
are not particularly happy with their boss either. When the first
vice premier goes to a basketball game or a soccer match, he usually
refuses to go to the VIP box and prefers to sit in the bleachers. In
addition to his passion for sports, Sergey Borisovich loves classic
Western rock, especially Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin.

Before his transformation into a high-level official, Ivanov was
distinguished by his unaffected style of dress. His university
friends remember that "he always wore the same wool sweater, and his
hair stuck out in every direction." A short time later, when he was
working at intelligence headquarters in Yasenevo, Sergey Borisovich
loved to wear jeans, turned inside out, after work. In recent years,
however, Ivanov naturally has abided by the strict official dress code.

In contrast to most of the high-level officials of the Putin era,
Sergey Borisovich is highly considerate of reporters. During the
annual conferences on security in Munich, Defence Minister Ivanov
always took his pool of reporters to one of the famous local beer
halls. According to people who were present at many private briefings,
the former head of the military establishment may not always have
provided specific answers to some questions, but his responses were
never ambiguous and were always thorough.

Ivanov’s behaviour with his subordinates is completely different. A man
of few words, he demands the same of others. The first vice premier
despises long conversations and conferences and cannot bear being
"burdened with unnecessary details."

Enemies of the first vice premier are able to learn about another facet
of Ivanov’s character. Ivanov’s first years as the defence minister
were marked by an intense fight for control of the ministry with
Chief of General Staff Anatoliy Kvashnin. Outwardly, however, Sergey
Borisovich’s relationship with his rival appeared quite cordial. Even
the ultimate dismissal of Kvashnin was arranged to look almost like
a promotion.

Which of Ivanov’s many public images is the real one? Probably none of
them. Sergey Borisovich can only feel completely free to be himself
among the friends and family he carefully screens from the eyes of
outsiders. In his relations with the outside world, it is as if Ivanov
is always clad in invisible armour.

"Feelings of Comradeship"

Ivanov’s rise to power fit the typical pattern for most of the St
Petersburgers Putin brought to Moscow. Sergey Ivanov, a new officer of
the First Division of the Leningrad KGB, met his colleague Vladimir
Putin approximately in 1976. There is no need to tell what happened
after that….

The first vice premier’s position in the government hierarchy cannot
be called typical, however. Even Ivanov’s foes admit that he is not
only an important subordinate of Vladimir Putin’s, but also his friend
and associate. There are not many of these even in Putin’s inner
circle. Here is what Putin said, for example, about Igor Sechin,
"the president’s right-hand man," in 2000: "He asked to come to
Moscow with me, so I brought him along." Putin chose completely
different words to describe his relationship with Ivanov: "feelings
of comradeship." Only Vladimir Vladimirovich and Sergey Borisovich
know why they have this kind of relationship, but the reasons for
Ivanov’s latest promotion easily can be guessed.

In the last seven years, most of the important members of
Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin’s retinue have become the centres of
political-bureaucratic empires. Igor Sechin, for example, is relied
upon by dozens, if not hundreds, of little-known but influential
middle-level officials and businessmen. Dmitriy Medvedev does not
have a team of his own, but he is supported, almost publicly, by the
old Yeltsin family, which has not lost its influence and resources.

Sergey Ivanov, on the other hand, is the typical political "lone
wolf." Despite the colossal number of his friends and associates, there
is no Ivanov team or family. Of course, an official on that level has
to have an inner circle, but its members can be counted on the fingers
of one hand, and all of them perform purely technical functions.

Former FSB analyst Andrey Chubotov, an extreme workaholic, is still
the chief of the minister’s staff in the Defence Ministry. Sergey
Rybakov, also from the FSB, is in charge of analysis and the media.

Former intelligence officer Vladimir Chernov, who worked with Ivanov in
the Finland station, now heads the first vice premier’s staff in the
White House. Sergey Borisovich once brought Nikolay Pankov, a former
instructor at the KGB Higher School, to the Defence Ministry, but in
his present position as the military establishment’s states-secretary,
Pankov has been "naturalized" in the ministry and has almost ceased
to be regarded as one of Ivanov’s personnel.

Another of Ivanov’s important distinctive features is his virtual
lack of ties to the business community. It is almost impossible to
believe something like this could be true under present conditions,
but I heard this from more than 10 informed sources, friends and
foes of the first vice premier, with only one exception. The only
difference was in their explanations of this phenomenon.

According to his friends, Sergey Borisovich is no ascetic, of course.

He was overjoyed during the Soviet era when he was able to buy a Volga
and move into an apartment in a 16-story building in Orekhovo-Borisovo
after he returned from an assignment abroad. For Ivanov, however,
making money is not the main thing. "For a long time after he became
the defence minister, he kept wearing a coat he had bought when he
was working in Finland in the 1980s," a good friend of the first vice
premier told me. "Sergey also took a long time to move into the new
apartment they had given him. It seems to me he just did not have
enough money for the renovations."

The explanation I was given by Ivanov’s enemies is less flattering,
of course. They say Sergey Borisovich lacks the knowledge and skill
to channel the flow of money in his own direction.

In Russia today, everyone is free to choose the explanation he prefers,
but it appears that the people who love to scoff at Ivanov for being a
"loser" are losing sight of one important fact. Sergey Borisovich’s
lack of a team and a business makes him an extremely valuable player
in Putin’s eyes now that a change of government is approaching. This is
the absolutely ideal set of qualities for a potential successor. After
all, this means that Ivanov’s only government asset is Vladimir
Vladimirovich himself. This trump card in the hands of a lone player
can "beat" Sechin’s entire army. In fact, this has already happened.

The Duel with Sechin

It is easy to guess the worst day of Sergey Ivanov’s political
career. On 25 January 2006, during the defence minister’s visit to
Armenia, he was asked: "What can you tell us about what happened in
Chelyabinsk?" Ivanov replied: "I have been high up in the mountains for
the last few days and I have not heard what happened in Chelyabinsk. I
am certain it was nothing serious. Otherwise, I would know about
it." When all of the TV networks started reporting the story of Private
Andrey Sychev, who had lost both legs in Chelyabinsk, the public saw
Ivanov as the personification of callousness and incompetence.

After the spectacular failure of the American attempt to overthrow
Fidel Castro in 1961, President Kennedy declared that the chief
executive was ultimately to blame. According to this completely logical
line of reasoning, the head of the Defence Ministry definitely is to
blame for the terrible tragedy in Chelyabinsk. The fact that many
of the key details of what happened to Sychev still are unclear
is not that important. Even the fact that the number of non-combat
casualties in the army fell from 1,264 in 2001 to 554 in 2006 is not
that important.

There is another facet of this situation, however, and it would be
foolish to ignore it. Former Kremlin staff member Aleksey Volin
recently amused the readers of the New York Times by relating a
conversation he had with a current member of the presidential staff:
"Why would you watch television? It is only for the population,
after all. People like you should be using the Internet!"

Unfortunately, this is only half a joke at best. Television in our
country is a source of propaganda rather than information. The very
fact that all of the TV networks were full of stories about the
Sychev tragedy means only one thing: Someone at the very top wanted
this very much.

Who wanted this? Members of the political elite believe it was Igor
Sechin. Few people now remember when or how the fight between Igor
Ivanovich and Sergey Borisovich started. It probably was less of a
personality conflict than a systemic clash. According to people who
know the ethics of the Kremlin: "Sechin is extremely jealous of anyone
who can go over his head to get to Putin, and Ivanov and Putin have
a close relationship Sechin cannot possibly influence."

In any case, on the orders of Sechin’s relative, Procurator-General
Vladimir Ustinov, the military procuracy started "uncovering crimes"
in Ivanov’s ministry with incredible zeal in 2005. After the tragic
incident involving Sychev, the assault included "heavy artillery"
– television.

It is important to realize that the organizers of the assault were
not focusing on public opinion. People in the Kremlin regard it as
a sort of clay, which easily can be moulded into any shape whatsoever.

The target audience was one and only one TV viewer – Vladimir
Vladimirovich Putin. They wanted the country’s leader to be irritated
by the head of the Defence Ministry – in about the same way, for
example, that he obviously is now irritated by Zurabov.

They did not succeed, however. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin first
reformed the informal system of TV administration and put the networks
under even stricter control. After that, Aleksandr Savenkov, the chief
military procurator, and Vladimir Ustinov, his boss, both lost their
jobs within the next year. Members of the political elite are still
arguing about the extent to which the conflict with Ivanov led to
Ustinov’s fall, but everyone agrees it was an important contributing
factor.

The "Philologist" in the Army

Sergey Ivanov obviously had no chance of becoming the army’s favourite
person. He cannot be called a total civilian, of course.

While he was still in school, Ivanov spent a month at a military
training camp near Petrozavodsk and later underwent parachute
training in the Pskov Division of the Airborne Troops. His work in
the intelligence service and in the FSB was not a completely civilian
occupation either, but Sergey Borisovich certainly does not have the
mindset of the model "paternal commander" in the army.

The exceptionally refined Ivanov addresses all of his subordinates by
their name and patronymic and uses the formal pronoun "you" when he is
speaking to them. According to his colleagues, "he drinks less than
he should," never uses obscenities, never yells, and rarely raises
his voice. It is not surprising that the army wits gave their former
boss the ambiguous nickname of "The Philologist"…. The defence
minister is no 100-euro bill, however. He cares more about results
than about popularity.

There is no doubt that Ivanov left the army in an incomparably better
condition than it was in when he took office. I will not lapse into
bombastic talk about "rebirth" and the "start of a turning point." If
I had ever had this inclination, it would have disappeared after I
spoke with the "non-elite" officers making less money than most of
the salesclerks in Moscow. Nevertheless, the army that was so lifeless
for the last decade is slowly beginning to show signs of life again,
even if these entail pain and the intense creaking of joints.

"Voronezh," the latest radar station, certainly is not a typical
military unit, but even a tour of this elite subunit proves some
sense of the intense contradictions making up the life of today’s army.

On the one hand, the equipment is ultra-modern. The station still
has no counterparts even in the NATO countries. Its predecessors
used 71 times as much energy and cost 10 times as much. The station’s
officers deserve unqualified respect and are fully capable of finding
a more lucrative occupation in the civilian sector. On the other hand,
housing conditions are deplorable. The construction of official housing
has been promised, but not for another two years. In the meantime,
the 17 unmarried officers, ranging in rank from lieutenant to major,
are all living together in one big room!

The 320,000 servicemen now in units on permanent alert status, the
resumption of brigade and division training exercises and regular
deliveries of new equipment and vehicles, the transfer of 78,000
soldiers, sergeants, and sergeant-majors to contract-based service, the
provision of servicemen on the waiting list for housing with 140,000
homes and the reduction of the list by more than one-fourth, and the
slight improvement of morale in the officer corps – all of these are
tangible accomplishments rather than mere promises "on paper."

The superficiality of the "state’s renewed concern for the army"
is a different matter. The sky-high prices of oil enabled the state
to increase defence expenditures from $8.2 billion in 2001 to 31.3
billion "greenbacks" this year. The main question, therefore, is this:
Could more have been accomplished with this amount of money?

I never was able to come up with a satisfactory answer to this
question. It is highly possible that the very qualities in Ivanov
that are so valuable to Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, including his
disinclination to form his own team and to manipulate financial flows,
were not necessarily the right qualities for a minister of defence.

"Any civilian defence minister is only able to make radical changes if
he arrives with a large and knowledgeable team of administrators and
financial experts," a respected government staff member with ties to
Ivanov told me. "Military administrators are a genuine caste, leading
everyone else around on a leash. Ivanov and Kudelina, the head of his
financial service, were rarely able to reach any agreements with them."

On the other hand, this same White House source admitted that Ivanov
was somewhat justified in avoiding radical "demolition." Any demolition
must be preceded by the precise knowledge of what will be built in
place of the demolished object. The transition period in Russian
history is not over yet, however. The profound geopolitical changes
in Eurasia are just beginning. Today, therefore, it is difficult to
say exactly what kind of army the country needs. Should it be set up,
for example, in opposition to NATO? Or is there every indication that
we will be on the same side as America in about 15 years, trying to
ward off China’s growing muscles?

In addition, we have to realize that there are some fundamental
problems no defence minister is capable of solving. This applies,
for example, to the demographic disaster Russia is slowly but surely
approaching. The problem of bringing military salaries up to a
civilized level might be equally difficult to solve. A joke making
the rounds of the military says that the rulers of capitalist Russia
have managed to do something even Lenin could not do, establishing
a genuine army of workers and peasants. There are essentially three
categories of servicemen in today’s armed forces: zealots, hostages
(the ones that cannot leave for various reasons), and people from
the poorest social strata. This obviously is an intolerable situation.

The rest of the public sector is also in a similar position today,
however. There is never enough income from oil to offer everyone a
decent salary, even in this time of Russian "prosperity."

Who Is Mr Ivanov?

"Precise and consistent in his performance, he has an excellent grasp
of the rules of play and of his place in the system and he never steps
out of bounds." That is how one former high-ranking officer of the
Foreign Intelligence Service described Sergey Ivanov’s fundamental
characteristics as a public official.

But how would Ivanov act if he suddenly had to be a leader? Would he
be able, for example, to display the necessary qualities of a leader?

What sort of policy line would he pursue? Obviously, it is ludicrous
to try to predict the exact behaviour of a man as private as Sergey
Borisovich, but we are quite safe in making a few assumptions.

"My reign will be just like my grandmother’s (Catherine II – Moskovskiy
Komsomolets)," Emperor Alexander I said in his first speech to the
Palace Guard after his accession to the throne in 1801.

If Ivanov were to become the chief executive, he probably would say
something quite similar about Putin. Any radical change of policy
line probably would be out of the question.

Only minor details are up for debate. "In contrast to Putin, Ivanov
never was able to overcome the inferiority complex stemming from
the loss of the ‘cold war,’" one of Sergey Borisovich’s former
colleagues in the intelligence service told me, clearly hinting at
an even more intense confrontation with the West if Ivanov were to
become the president. Other people who know the first vice premier
disagree categorically: "Sergey’s most salient characteristic is his
unconditional observance of the proprieties."

There are also diametrically opposed opinions of Ivanov’s ability to
alter today’s "managed democracy" in Russia. Some people base their
views on the fact that Ivanov had a chance to see Western democracy in
action in England and Finland, in contrast to Vladimir Vladimirovich
Putin, who worked in the GDR. The opinions of others are coloured
by the fact that the only elections Sergey Borisovich ever won in
his life were to the Komsomol committee of the Philology Department
(putting him in charge of the sports sector) and to the party committee
of his intelligence subdivision.

"Who is Mr Putin?" I can remember everyone trying to answer this
difficult question seven years ago. If today’s second first vice
premier becomes the president, people will be just as interested in
finding the answer to the question of "Who is Mr Ivanov?"

The Secret Service Man’s Main Secret

Active wives are not rare in the military. Tamara, the wife of Marshal
Igor Sergeyev, the minister of defence, was well known to the members
of her husband’s personal staff, for example. She handled the marshal’s
professional affairs and, as old-timers in the military establishment
recall, "ruled everyone with a rod of iron." Sergey Ivanov’s "other
half," Irina, belongs to the other category of political wives –
the invisible spouse.

Irina Ivanova only accompanies her husband in his official capacity
when it is absolutely necessary, such as, for example, when Donald
Rumsfeld, then the head of the US defence establishment, came to St
Petersburg and the two ministerial couples took a cruise on the Neva.

We know that Sergey and Irina got married when Ivanov was still a
student in the Philology Department of Leningrad University. Irina
moved to the banks of the Neva from Moscow for the sake of her
husband’s career. When Ivanov was working as an intelligence officer
abroad, she chose to improve her skills and earned a Western academic
degree. When they returned to Russia, Irina took a job at a branch
of a large Western company. According to their friends, it was her
salary that enabled the family to survive the 1990s with dignity.

Sergey Borisovich’s salary in the intelligence service in those years
could only be described as "ludicrous."

Ivanov’s sons, Aleksandr and Sergey, are also in business and avoid
publicity as much as possible. Sometimes they are caught up in it
anyway, however, as they were in spring 2005, for example, when
Aleksandr Ivanov was involved in a traffic accident with a tragic
outcome.

Russian Politicians Mull Possibility Of Third Term For Putin

RUSSIAN POLITICIANS MULL POSSIBILITY OF THIRD TERM FOR PUTIN

NTV Mir, Moscow
1 Apr 07

The leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) Vladimir
Zhirinovskiy, senator and member of A Just Russia party’s central
council Sergey Lisovskiy and member of presidium of One Russia party
general council Andrey Isayev were studio guests of the Russian NTV
Mir programme "Sunday night with Vladimir Solovyev", broadcast on
01 Apr 07. They were invited to discuss the possibility of amending
the constitution to allow the president to stay for the third term
and to change the duration of presidential term to seven years. The
proposal to this effect was made last week by Federation Council
speaker Sergey Mironov.

Zhirinovskiy, in his usual populist manner, started by saying that
the Federation Council is "a holiday resort" and its speaker, happy
with just being re-elected to the third term himself, would like this
situation to last and last. "He wants to stay on for the fourth and
the fifth terms. That is, he favours the Turkmen-Belarusian option".

Moreover, since Mironov is not responsible for anything he does,
he does not realize that by proposing such a thing he actually
"undermines the president", who "said it hundred times already that
he wouldn’t stay and saw no need for that".

Isayev added that such proposals have been voiced "at least four or
seven times", and each time Putin "waved them away like irritating
flies".

The discussion then generally deviated towards One Russia party’s real
and perceived popularity, dissentions within the party and Mironov’s
re-election as Federation Councils chairman.

Steering the process onto its designated tracks, the host of the
programme Vladimir Solovyev suggested that Mironov, as the third
most important person in the country, might have already consulted
the lawyers before he decided to come up with his proposal yet again.

"There must be a procedure to bring to life whatever Mr Mironov is
having in mind," Solovyev said, adding that "technically, this would
be possible, after all".

Lisovskiy challenged his opponents to name any man other than Putin
who would be able to maintain in balance One Russia, which he called
a "political monopoly". Isayev retorted that Putin would "remain a
political leader of the country even after his presidency". He argued
that Putin can continue pursuing his course even when he steps down.

"He is not an ordinary official, who just has a post with no
influence. His will continue to have influence in the country. It
will be useful and beneficial when political and administrative
leadership are not combined in one person". In Isayev’s view, Putin
can become a leader of the majority party, like George Washington,
for instance. He said he was confident that the man to succeed Putin
would continue his policy, albeit in "a slightly different way and
with a different team". For his party "it is most important to stay
on the course taken by Putin".

Zhirinovskiy said the best option would be to get rid of the Federation
Council and the presidency altogether and introduce the parliamentary
system, which would result in the "real freedom".

Solovyev pointed out that Putin’s rating remains so high because he
is not associated in the public mind either with the executive or
legislative authority, the trust in both of which is much lower. He
said it was evident that the public genuinely loves Putin and many
politicians have built their careers by demonstrating their devotion
to Putin. "The most shining example of this we saw in the Federation
Council, when it was said: m’lord, I love you so much, just don’t go
away too soon!"

Summing up the discussion, Lisovskiy said the fact that Mironov could
say whatever he wanted to say in the Federation Council, just as any
other of its members, is in itself a major achievement of the upper
chamber. He said, he is personally against the third term for the
president, even though there are some positive tactical aspects to
this proposal. However, strategically the consequences of such move
would be negative.

Isayev, who throughout the discussion was busy warding off criticism
continuously levelled against his party by his debating opponents,
insisted that his was "the only party with open and free discussion
between its left and right wings". He even admitted voting against
Mironov’s election as St Petersburg representative in the Federation
Council. However, Mironov owes his re-election solely to One Russia’s
support, he said. Putin, he said, is "not just a good man, he is
associated with a certain political course". This course presumes a
"gradual transition to a normal political structure of the state, and
one of imperative conditions of this is rotation of presidency". "He
could be very influential and enjoy a very high level of public
support. But we must understand that authority is not just some lofty
thing, but a function of governing society. And this function must
be performed within a set term. In demanding a third term for Putin,
they mean third terms for themselves."

Zhirinovskiy said the matter was not about the third term per se,
but the fact that "by the end of the third term, the question of the
fourth term would immediately arise, then the fifth". This is because
"politics is like money, alcohol or narcotic – the doses just keep
increasing until everything collapses". "Would they want to leave
after another four years, in 2012, after being in power for 12 years
already? Whatever for? Why wouldn’t Lukashenka, Nazarbayev, Rahmonov,
Karimov?"

Asked whether they personally think that Putin will remain for the
third term, Isayev and Lisovskiy said they did not think so.

Zhirinovskiy disagreed saying he will stay because "a scenario of
military conflict in southern Russia will be played. America will
be bombing Iran, there will be lots of refugees fleeing to Armenia,
Azerbaijan and Georgia. Georgia will attack Abkhazia and Ossetia,
and there are Russian citizens there. In the conditions of total
mobilization, with `arise, the mighty country!’ [quote from WW2
patriotic song], they will hold a quick referendum and things will be
quickly changed to suit the occasion. Just as it happened in Dagestan
in 2000. As usual, the war and America would help us."

At which point Solovyev rounded up the discussion saying let’s wait
and see what happens after December parliamentary election.

Shoemaker’s Tools Will Relieve The Problems Of The Family

SHOEMAKER’S TOOLS WILL RELIEVE THE PROBLEMS OF THE FAMILY

KarabakhOpen
02-04-2007 21:56:18

Hasmik Iskandaryan moved to live in the village of Haterk from Yerevan
when she was a young bride. Her family lived in Russia for a long
time, but in the beginning of the movement of Artsakh they moved to
their native village.

We met Hasmik at a small shop on the edge of the village. She said
she rented the shop to "support the family somehow". Hasmik says she
has to work in the shop because she borrowed money from the bank and
hardly makes both ends meet. There is a problem with her son who has
married recently, and they are going to have a baby soon.

"The family is large, it is difficult to support so many
people. Besides, my second son fell ill. And both are unemployed. We
live in a house with two rooms. I have asked the head of the community
to help us and provide us with an apartment. Now my second son is
going to get married and I cannot have them live in two rooms."

Hasmik says everyone in their family tries to earn. Her husband serves
in the army, soon he will retire and help her with the shop. Her son,
who has disability, also wants to work but he cannot find a suitable
job. The mother says he "is fond of shoemaking", and she wants to
buy instruments for her son to earn money and help the family.

Workers Of The Mill Went On A Strike

WORKERS OF THE MILL WENT ON A STRIKE

KarabakhOpen
02-04-2007 21:57:16

"Our director abuses us," say the workers of the largest mill in
Karabakh, who went on a strike On April 2. Over 50 workers say they
have got no salary for 6 months, and everyday "the director Movses
Sahakyan cheats us and promises to pay tomorrow."

Each of the 107 workers have their problems – they borrow money,
we have been working for free for many months. I buy food on credit
for several months now. How am I going to pay my debts? one of the
strikers said to KarabakhOpen.

We could not meet with the director and owner of the mill Movses
Sahakyan because he has gone away. We have already informed that the
owner and director of the bread factory and the mill M. Sahakyan is
likely to sell the company.

However, he denied this information.

The workers say they will continue the strike until they get their
salaries.