Interview with Aztag’s Shahan Kandaharian

PanArmenian News Network, Armenia
March 19 2007

Shahan Kandaharian:
Armenian people to benefit from dual citizenship

The Near East has always been the center of the Armenian Diaspora.
Armenians who survived the Genocide in 1915 found shelter here. The
Armenian community of Lebanon is one of the oldest and weighty ones
throughout the Diaspora. Shahan Kandaharian, the Editor-in-Chief of
Azdak Beirut-based newspaper, comments to PanARMENIAN.Net on the life
of the community and situation in Lebanon.
19.03.2007 GMT+04:00

The law on dual citizenship has been recently adopted in Armenia.
What’s the attitude of the Diaspora about it?

The debates on the law on dual citizenship were focused in the
`classic’ Armenian Diaspora residing in the Near East, specifically
in Lebanon. As a matter of fact, this document is of utmost
importance for Armenians who were deprived of homeland. The law will
restore historical justice and a proper approach to the Diaspora. The
former authorities prohibited dual citizenship over political
reasons. Nowadays, the Armenianhood being dispersed throughout the
globe has been offered a new outlook. We will join our efforts and
the Diaspora will possess a document proving its existence at the
international level. We, the people living beyond our fatherland,
will know that our children will be citizens of Armenia. However, the
discussion develops in two directions. First, you shouldn’t forget
that many people left Armenia during the recent years and adoption of
the law will help them to restore or maintain Armenian citizenship.
Second, the issue also needs consideration from the viewpoint of the
European Neighborhood Policy. Armenia is integrating into European
structures and the law must meet European standards. I suppose,
neither of the EU member states bans dual citizenship. Thus,
proceeding from the interests of the nation and the state, I am
convinced that we all will benefit from the adoption of the law.

How would you comment on the role of the Diasporan press?

The activities of the Diasporan press have always been targeted at
maintenance of nation and language. However, there are some urgent
problems that need to be spoken about. It’s not a secret that press
is experiences hard times. New alternative media structures fill in
the information space with comments and reviews. Furthermore, the
number of readers decreases. Under the circumstances the mission of
the Armenian press should be changed. With the help of electronic
media information is quick to reach the audience. Three Armenian
dailies are issued in Lebanon. These are Azdak (ARF Dashnaktsutyun),
Zartonk (Ramkavar-Azatakan party) and Ararat (Hnchakyan party). When
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan arrived in Lebanon we
published a joint number dedicated to the Armenian Genocide. We also
protested the presence of Turkish peacekeepers in Lebanon.

The war in Lebanon is over but the country is far from living in
peace. Comment, please, on the life of the Armenian community of
Beirut and other Armenian-inhabited towns.

When speaking of the Armenian community of Lebanon I should first of
all refer to the post war situation and international political
crisis. Although the Armenian population was safe, the deep political
crisis, the strike of the opposition and absence of dialogue between
the government and opposition arouse concern. The community, like the
other people, experiences hard economic circumstances. However, we
are accustomed to hardships, During 17 years of civil war our people
were among those who laid down their lives in struggle, but were are
strong enough to recover. The Armenian community of Lebanon is
special. The Catholicosate of the Great House of Cilicia, the
Armenian Evangelical Church, numerous Diasporan centers and head
offices of Diasporan organizations are situated in this country.
Despite difficulties and losses the community is firm. Beirut is the
capital of the Armenian Diaspora, we say.

Would you describe the current situation in Lebanon, please?

The current situation is complex and unstable. The authorities are in
severe confrontation with the opposition. Muslims shiites refused to
join the coalition government. The Armenian political parties
sometimes disagree on the Lebanese problems as well, but,
traditionally, Armenian organizations are wise enough to distinguish
Lebanese problems from Armenian national problems and reach a common
ground on the issues, especially if the matter concern security of
the community.

«PanARMENIAN.Net», 19.03.2007