Genocide Vote Anger

GENOCIDE VOTE ANGER
By Charles Bremner

The Times, UK
Oct 12 2006

FRANCE was on a collision course with Turkey and the European Union
last night as MPs prepared to vote today on a Socialist Bill that
would make it a criminal offence to deny that Turkish massacres of
Armenians in 1915-17 constituted genocide.

President Chirac’s Government has distanced itself from the draft law,
which has also been condemned by academics in France and Turkey as a
dangerous attempt to legislate history. The law would punish denial
with a maximum one-year prison term and a fine of up to ~@45,000
(£30,000).

France’s existing law banning denial of the Nazi Holocaust is
different, the critics say, because it is aimed against anti-Semitism.

With 400,000 French citizens of Armenian descent, and with elections
seven months away, many MPs from the ruling Union for a Popular
Movement (UMP), are expected to refrain from opposing it.

–Boundary_(ID_DAOOKsNXSyePYq/cmRtSWg)–

Armenia Has Reputation Of Reliable Country In Region

ARMENIA HAS REPUTATION OF RELIABLE COUNTRY IN REGION

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Oct 12 2006

YEREVAN, October 11. /ARKA/. Armenia has reputation of a reliable
country in the region, stated RA Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan.

"Everybody is well aware that Armenia has its place and role in the
region, and our country can be relied on," stated Oskanyan in his
interview to the "Hayastani Hanrapetutyun" newspaper.

According to him, the result is that Armenia receives large-scale
support in various issues. He said that among Armenia’s partners are
the countries interested in the region’s security and development.

"We are part of the international community, international family.

During its independence, Armenia has made its contribution to the
development of civilization, politics, culture, and this process is
continuing today," Oskanyan said. He added that the deeper are the
relations between the countries the "more appreciable will be mutual
contribution."

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian PM Thanks Romanian Ambassador For Contribution To Bilateral

ARMENIAN PM THANKS ROMANIAN AMBASSADOR FOR CONTRIBUTION TO BILATERAL RELATIONS

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Oct 12 2006

YEREVAN, October 11. /ARKA/. Armenian Prime Minister Andranik
Margaryan has held a meeting with outgoing Romanian Ambassador to
Armenia Nikolay Yordake. Characterizing the Ambassador’s three-year
activities as efficient, the RA Premier thanked him for his efforts
toward developing the bilateral friendly relations.

Speaking of bilateral relations, Margaryan pointed out that the
Romanian President’s recent visit to Armenia will give a new impetus
to Armenian-Romanian mutually advantageous cooperation. During the
visit, the Armenian-Romanian Intergovernmental Commission for Trade,
Economic, Scientific and Technical Cooperation held its fourth meeting.

In his turn, Ambassador Yordake thanked the RA Premier and the
country’s Government for their support. He pointed out that he is
leaving Armenia and its hospitable people with the best memories and
friendly feelings. Ambassador Yordake expressed the confidence that
the appointment of a new Romanian ambassador will expand bilateral
cooperation, and Armenian-Romanian economic relations will reach the
high level of political relations.

The Nobel Prize 2006

THE NOBEL PRIZE 2006

SR International – Radio Sweden, Sweden
Oct 12 2006

The 2006 Nobel Prizes were announced in Stockholm starting with the
Medicine prize, on the 2nd of October.

The Nobel Prizes are announced out over two week period in Sweden
and Norway.

The prize-awarding institutions are scientific and literary bodies
in Sweden, and a committee elected by the Norwegian Parliament to
choose the peace laureate.

The Swedish institutions invite nominations from past laureates
and selected university professors. For the peace prize, members of
governments and parliaments worldwide can also make nominations.

The Awards

All awards are always presented on the 10th of December, the
anniversary of the death in 1896 of Alfred Nobel, theSwedish
industrialist who set up and financed the prizes.

Occasionally no winner is announced.

The identities of the winners are announced simultaneously, with
citations explaining the choice, at a news conference in the Swedish
capital and by couriers sent to the Stockholm offices of international
news agencies.

The peace prize is announced and awarded in Oslo, the Norwegian
capital. Alfred Nobel designated that the Peace Prize be awarded in
Norway which at the time was joined to Sweden in a political union.

Nobel Committee members almost never discuss their choices in public,
and runners-up aren’t revealed for 50 years.

Each Award is 10 million Swedish kronor, or some $1.4 million US
dollars, plus a diploma, and gold medal. Laureates and their families
are invited to gala ceremonies in Stockholm and Oslo which are followed
by lavish banquets with Scandinavian royalty.

2006 Nobel Medicine Prize

Americans Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello won the Nobel medicine
prize for discovering a method of turning off selected genes,
an important research tool that scientists hope will lead to new
treatments for HIV, cancer and other illnesses.

The Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm honoured the pair for their
relatively recent discovery of RNA interference, which it called "a
fundamental mechanism for controlling the flow of genetic information."

Fire’s and Mello’s findings, published in 1998, opened a new field
of research that has helped researchers break down, or silence,
specific genes to help neutralize harmful viruses and mutations. RNA
interference occurs in plants, animals, and humans. It is already
being widely used in basic science as a method to study the function
of genes and it may lead to novel therapies in the future. AIDS
researchers hope RNA interference can help them develop new drugs to
fight viruses such as HIV.

"It looks very encouraging today, but it’s too early to say whether it
will find an important place in the therapeutic arsenal" against HIV,
said Goran Hansson, chairman of the prize committee.

Erna Moller, a member of the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska, said RNA
interference has already had a dramatic effect on the pharmaceutical
and biotech industries.

RNA, or ribonucleic acid, is a biomolecule that can store and
transmit genetic information, similar to the role of DNA. In 1989,
Americans Sidney Altman and Thomas Cech were awarded the Nobel Prize
in chemistry for discovering RNA’s catalytic properties.

Fire, 47, of Stanford University, and Mello, 45, of the University
of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, published their seminal
work in the journal Nature in 1998. The two men will share the prize,
including 10 million kronor ($1.4 US dollar million).

The Nobel committees typically honour discoveries that have been
tested over decades, but Hansson said the findings by Fire and Mello
had a big impact even though they were published just eight years ago.

Last year’s medicine prize went to Australians Barry J. Marshall and
Robin Warren for discovering that bacteria, not stress, causes ulcers.

2006 Nobel Physics Prize

Americans John C. Mather and George F. Smoot won the 2006 Nobel Prize
in physics for work that helped cement the big-bang theory of how
the universe was created and deepen understanding of the origin of
galaxies and stars.

The scientists shared the prestigious 10 million kronor ($1.4 million
US dollar) award for discovering the nature of "blackbody radiation"
– cosmic background radiation believed to stem from the big bang –
the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm said.

Mather, 60, and Smoot, 61, based their work on measurements done with
the help of the NASA-launched Cosmic Background Explorer satellite
in 1989. They were able to observe the universe in its early stages
about 380,000 years after it was born. Ripples in the light they
detected also helped demonstrate how galaxies came together over time.

"It is one of the greatest discoveries of the century. I would call
it the greatest. It increases our knowledge of our place in the
universe." Per Carlson, chairman of the Nobel committee for physics.

Mather, works at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt,
Maryland, and Smoot works at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
in Berkeley, California. Mather said he and Smoot did not realize
how important their work was at the time of their discovery.

However, their work was soon hailed as a major breakthrough.

Mather received standing ovations when he presented the COBE results
to the American Astronomical Society in 1990. After the results were
published in 1992, famed astronomer and author Stephen Hawking called
it "the greatest discovery of the century, if not of all times." By
confirming the predictions of the big-bang theory, which states that
the universe was born of a dense and incredibly hot state billions
of years ago, with direct quantitative evidence, the scientists
transformed the study of the early universe from a largely theoretical
pursuit into a new era of direct observation and measurement.

The COBE project gave strong support for the big-bang theory because
it is the only scenario that predicts the kind of cosmic microwave
radiation measured by the satellite. The academy called Mather the
driving force behind the COBE project while Smoot was responsible
for measuring small variations in the temperature of the radiation.

"The very detailed observations that the laureates have carried out
from the COBE satellite have played a major role in the development
of modern cosmology into a precise science," Royal Swedish Academy
of Sciences

Since 1986, Americans have either won or shared the physics prize
with people from other countries 15 times. Last year, Americans John
L. Hall and Roy J. Glauber and German Theodor W. Haensch won the
prize for work that could lead to better long-distance communication
and more precise navigation worldwide and in space.

2006 Nobel Chemistry Prize

American Roger Kornberg, the son of a Nobel laureate, won the 2006
Nobel chemistry prize for showing how genes are copied, a process
essential to how cells develop and life itself.

Kornberg’s prize came 47 years after he watched his father Arthur
accept the medicine Nobel in Stockholm for his own gene work. It also
crowned the success for U.S. scientists, who have swept all the 2006
Nobel science awards.

The Swedish Academy of Sciences, which makes the10-million-crown
($1.36 US dollar million) award, said Roger Kornberg’s research into
how ribonucleic acid, RNA, moves geneticinformation around the body
was of "fundamental medical importance."

Kornberg’s discovery showed how DNA, which he has describedas a silent
map, is "read" by RNA and converted into a protein within a cell.

Kornberg was 12 when he traveled to Stockholm to see his father receive
the 1959 Nobel for medicine for studies of how genetic information
is ferried from one DNA molecule to another.

As an undergraduate, the younger Kornberg said he briefly considered
majoring in English literature, but his passion for science won out,
he told a news conference at Stanford University in California,
where he and his father both still work.

The Kornbergs are the eighth set of parent and child laureates.

The Swedish Academy of Sciences said the process of gene copying,
or genetic transcription, was central to life.

"(It) is a key mechanism to the biological machinery. If it does not
work, we die,"Per Ahlberg, member of the Nobel Committee for Chemistry

And because the transfer of information helps explain how a cell
becomes a nerve or liver or muscle cell, understanding transcription
is crucial for the development of various therapeutic applications
of stem cells.

Kornberg used a process called X-ray crystallography – in which
molecules in a chemical reaction are "frozen" into crystals and
photographed using X-rays – to capture transcription in action and
in incredible detail. These images showed the complex structure RNA
uses to make this translation.

2006 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences

The 2006 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences has been won by
an American economist who developed theories about unemployment that
better capture how workers and companies actually make decisions
about jobs.

Edmund S. Phelps, 73, a professor at Columbia University in New York,
was cited Monday for research into the relationship between inflation
and unemployment, giving

"Phelps’ work has fundamentally altered our views on how the
macroeconomy operates." Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Phelps told reporters in his New York apartment that he learned of
the prize in a phone call from Sweden that woke him early in the
morning. He said he had waited for the award for a long time, but
wasn’t expecting it this year.

Phelps was born in Chicago and earned his bachelor’s degree at Amherst
College in Amherst, Massachusetts, in 1955 and his Ph.D. at Yale
University in 1959. He has been the McVickar professor of political
economy at Columbia since 1982.

The Swedish academy said the theoretical framework Phelps developed
in the late 1960s helped economists understand the root of soaring
prices and unemployment in the 1970s and the limitations of policies
to deal with these problems. His framework helped central banks shift
their focus toward using inflation expectations to set monetary policy
rather than concentrating on money supply and demand.

Phelps argued that this view did not take workers’ or companies’
decision-making into account, and his research showed that their
expectations about both unemployment andinflation affected their
actions.

Phelps told reporters that his goal was to make economic theory better
reflect the real world. "I’ve been interested in trying to put people
in a more realistic way into our economic models," Phelps said. "In
particular I’ve emphasized that people have to form expectations
about the current state of the world and also expectations about the
future, including the consequences for the future of their actions
in the present."

He said this is not easy because people make decisions with
incomplete information about the state of the world and how the
economy works. "It’s a great big mess, but I think the messiness was
not sufficiently appreciated earlier," he said.

Phelps did his work at a time economists believed that a government
could not lower unemployment without triggering inflation.

The economics prize is the only one of the awards not established in
the will left by Swedish industrialistAlfred Nobel 111 years ago. The
medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peace prizes were first
awarded in 1901, while the economics prize was set up separately by
the Swedish central bank in 1968. It carries an award of $1.4 million
US dollars.

Last year’s laureates were Robert J. Aumann, a citizen of Israel and
the United States, and American Thomas C. Schelling, for their work
in game-theory analysis. Both men were interviewed by Radio Sweden
in Sweden just before they received their award

Nobel Literature Prize

Turkish writer Orhan Pamuk, author of "My Name is Red", "Snow"
and half-a-dozen other novels, won the Nobel Literature Prize on
Thursday for a body of work that probes the crossroads of Muslim and
Western cultures.

The Swedish Academy said Pamuk "in the quest for the melancholic
soul of his native city (Istanbul) has discovered new symbols for
the clash and interlacing of cultures."

The 54-year-old writer is Turkey’s best-known author at home and
abroad, but also a political rebel whose pronouncements on his
country’s history have put its respect for freedom of expression
under the international spotlight.

"In his home country, Pamuk has a reputation as a social commentator
even though he sees himself principally a fiction writer with no
political agenda," the Swedish Academy

Turkey’s decades-old striving to become European – characterized
by clashes between Islam and secularism, tradition and modernity –
along with the painful impact of an aggressive westernization after
the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, permeate Pamuk’s writing.

Pamuk was the first author in the Muslim world to publicly condemn
the 1989 fatwa against Salman Rushdie, and he took a stand for his
Turkish colleague Yasar Kemal when the latter was put on trial in 1995.

Pamuk himself faced prosecution after telling a Swiss newspaper last
year that 30,000 Kurds and one million Armenians had been killed
during World War I under the Ottoman Turks.

The charges against him sparked widespread international protest,
and were dropped earlier this year.

Just hours before the Swedish Academy made its announcement, the
French lower house of parliament approved a bill making it a punishable
offence to deny that the massacre of Armenians constituted genocide.

Pamuk is the first Turk to win the prestigious prize, and had been
rumoured as one of the frontrunners this year. A chain-smoker, he
mostly shuns the public eye, writing for long hours in an Istanbul
flat overlooking the bridge over the Bosphorus linking Europe and Asia.

Born in 1952 into a prosperous, secular family, Pamuk was intent on
becoming a painter in his youth. He studied architecture at Istanbul
Technical University but later turned to writing and studied journalism
in Istanbul.

He published his prize-winning first novel, "Cevdet Bey and His Sons",
in 1982, a family chronicle in which he describes the shift from a
traditional Ottoman family environment to a more Western lifestyle.

His second novel, "The House of Silence", came out in 1983, but it
was his third book, "The White Castle", published two years later,
that gave him an international reputation.

"Structured as a historical novel set in 17th century Istanbul, it is
"on a symbolic level, the European novel captured then allied with
an alien culture," the Swedish Academy.

With the 2000 book "My Name is Red" – a love story, murder mystery and
discussion on the role of individuality in art – Pamuk explores the
relationship between East and West, describing an artist’s different
relationship to his work in each culture.

His latest novel is the critically-acclaimed "Snow", set in Turkey’s
border town of Kars, once a border city between the Ottoman and
Russian empires.

"The novel becomes a tale of love and poetic creativity just as it
knowledgeably describes the political and religious conflicts that
characterise Turkish society of our day," The Swedish Academy

Pamuk will take home the prize sum of 10 million kronor, or some 1.37
million US dollars.

BEIRUT: Armenians Rally Against Turkish Participation In U.N. Peacek

ARMENIANS RALLY AGAINST TURKISH PARTICIPATION IN U.N. PEACEKEEPING FORCE IN LEBANON

NaharNet, Lebanon
Oct 12 2006

Thousands of Lebanon’s Armenians rallied in Beirut Thursday against
Turkish troops taking part in a U.N. peacekeeping force there, on
the same day France moved to make denial of the Ottoman genocide of
Armenians a crime.

Armenian political and religious leaders attended the demonstration,
which came just two days after the first contingent of Turkish
peacekeepers arrived to police a ceasefire between Israel and
Hizbullah.

The rally took place on Beirut’s downtown Place des Martyrs, which
honors six Lebanese nationalists who were hanged by the Ottomans
during World War I.

The crowd, drawn from an Armenian community of about 140,000 people,
held high banners denouncing the presence of Turkish troops as "an
insult to the collective memory of the Armenian people", while waving
Armenian, Lebanese and French flags.

"Genocide, massacre, deportation: Turkey’s definition of peace,"
read another banner.

Earlier Thursday, French deputies approved a bill making it a crime
to deny that the 1915-1917 massacre of Armenians by the Ottomans was
genocide, provoking the fury of Turkey, the modern state that emerged
from the Ottoman Empire.

"What France has done is very good. The Lebanese government should
do the same instead of welcoming Turkish troops," said an elderly
demonstrator who gave his name as Taurus.

"Chirac is on the right track," said one of the organizers, Sarkis
Katchadorian, referring to French President Jacques Chirac.

Overriding widespread opposition, the Turkish parliament approved a
government motion on September 5 to contribute troops to the U.N.

Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) following a ceasefire that ended
34 days of fighting.

In total, Turkey is to deploy some 700 soldiers in Lebanon, including
troops aboard naval ships. Those that landed on Tuesday were the
first Muslim peacekeepers to arrive in the war-scarred country.

Turkey contests the term "genocide" and strongly opposed the French
bill.

It says 300,000 Armenians, and at least as many Turks, died in civil
strife when Armenians took up arms for independence and sided with
invading Russian troops as the Ottoman Empire fell apart during World
War I.

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their ancestors were slaughtered
in orchestrated killings, which they maintain can only be seen as
genocide.

The French bill must now go to the Senate, or upper house of
parliament, for another vote.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Turkey Says Ties Damaged By French Approval Of Armenia Genocide Bill

TURKEY SAYS TIES DAMAGED BY FRENCH APPROVAL OF ARMENIA GENOCIDE BILL

International Herald Tribune. France
The Associated Press
Oct 12 2006

ANKARA, Turkey Turkey’s foreign minister said the country would
consider retaliatory measures against France, and unions called for a
trade boycott after French lawmakers on Thursday passed a bill making
it a crime to deny that Armenians suffered genocide at the hands of
the Ottoman Turks.

In Ankara, angry protesters pelted the French Embassy with eggs,
while others laid a black wreath at the gate of the French Consulate
in Istanbul.

"No one should harbor the conviction that Turkey will take this
lightly," Turkey’s foreign minister, Abdullah Gul, said. "The
parliament will meet on Tuesday with a special agenda and no doubt
we have measures to take in every field."

Gul did not elaborate but his comments were interpreted by many as
also being a reference to proposals currently being debated by Turkish
lawmakers to recognize an "Algerian genocide" by France.

"This is a national issue, no doubt our reaction both at the official
and public level will be very big," Gul said.

He said the bill dealt a serious blow to Turkish-French relations
and seriously damaged the credibility of France as a European Union
member which defends freedom of expression.

"From now on, France will never describe itself as the homeland of
freedoms," Gul said. "It will never be proud of being the country
where ideas are freely expressed."

"This shame will really be a grave one for them," Gul said.

France in 2001 recognized the killings of up to 1.5 million Armenians
from 1915 to 1919 as genocide; under Thursday’s bill, those who contest
it was genocide would risk up to a year in prison and fines of up to
~@45,000 (US$56,000).

Armenians say the killings were part of an organized campaign to force
Armenians out of eastern Turkey. However, Turkey says the death toll
is inflated and contends that a large number of people died in civil
unrest during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

Several trade groups called for a boycott of French goods, asking
the government to oust French firms from multimillion dollar energy
and defense tenders. Turkey had removed French firms some lucrative
tenders back in 2001 when French lawmakers voted to characterize the
killings of Armenians as genocide.

Gul hinted that Turkish reaction would now be much stronger.

Bulent Deniz, president of Turkish Consumers Union, said French goods
would be boycotted.

"Every week, we will announce a French trademark and increase the
number of goods in the boycott list," Deniz said. "We will reflect
the Turkish consumers reaction in the right way to France, it is
economic sanctions."

Ahmet Ozkul, a local official of a pro-Islamic businessmen association,
MUSIAD, in the western city of Bursa, also pressed for economic
sanctions against France.

"French firms, especially those operating in environment,
transportation, energy and defense sectors, must be ousted from major
tenders," Ozkul said.

ANKARA, Turkey Turkey’s foreign minister said the country would
consider retaliatory measures against France, and unions called for a
trade boycott after French lawmakers on Thursday passed a bill making
it a crime to deny that Armenians suffered genocide at the hands of
the Ottoman Turks.

In Ankara, angry protesters pelted the French Embassy with eggs,
while others laid a black wreath at the gate of the French Consulate
in Istanbul.

"No one should harbor the conviction that Turkey will take this
lightly," Turkey’s foreign minister, Abdullah Gul, said. "The
parliament will meet on Tuesday with a special agenda and no doubt
we have measures to take in every field."

Gul did not elaborate but his comments were interpreted by many as
also being a reference to proposals currently being debated by Turkish
lawmakers to recognize an "Algerian genocide" by France.

"This is a national issue, no doubt our reaction both at the official
and public level will be very big," Gul said.

He said the bill dealt a serious blow to Turkish-French relations
and seriously damaged the credibility of France as a European Union
member which defends freedom of expression.

"From now on, France will never describe itself as the homeland of
freedoms," Gul said. "It will never be proud of being the country
where ideas are freely expressed."

"This shame will really be a grave one for them," Gul said.

France in 2001 recognized the killings of up to 1.5 million Armenians
from 1915 to 1919 as genocide; under Thursday’s bill, those who contest
it was genocide would risk up to a year in prison and fines of up to
~@45,000 (US$56,000).

Armenians say the killings were part of an organized campaign to force
Armenians out of eastern Turkey. However, Turkey says the death toll
is inflated and contends that a large number of people died in civil
unrest during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

Several trade groups called for a boycott of French goods, asking
the government to oust French firms from multimillion dollar energy
and defense tenders. Turkey had removed French firms some lucrative
tenders back in 2001 when French lawmakers voted to characterize the
killings of Armenians as genocide.

Gul hinted that Turkish reaction would now be much stronger.

Bulent Deniz, president of Turkish Consumers Union, said French goods
would be boycotted.

"Every week, we will announce a French trademark and increase the
number of goods in the boycott list," Deniz said. "We will reflect
the Turkish consumers reaction in the right way to France, it is
economic sanctions."

Ahmet Ozkul, a local official of a pro-Islamic businessmen association,
MUSIAD, in the western city of Bursa, also pressed for economic
sanctions against France.

"French firms, especially those operating in environment,
transportation, energy and defense sectors, must be ousted from major
tenders," Ozkul said.

Controversial Turkish Writer Wins Nobel Literature Prize

CONTROVERSIAL TURKISH WRITER WINS NOBEL LITERATURE PRIZE
By Elsa McLaren and agencies

The Times, UK
Oct 12 2006

Novelist Orhan Pamuk, whose prosecution for "insulting Turkishness"
raised concerns about suppression of free speech in Turkey, has today
won the Nobel literature prize.

His novels that have been translated into dozens of languages include
My Name is Red, Snow and The White Castle and deal with the clash
between past and present, East and West, secularism and Islamism,
often against the colourful backdrop of his native Istanbul.

The Swedish Academy said that that the 54-year-old writer "in the
quest for the melancholic soul of his native city has discovered new
symbols for the clash and interlacing of cultures."

Not one to avoid confrontation, Pamuk went on trial for telling a
Swiss newspaper that Turkey was unwilling to deal with two of the most
painful episodes in recent Turkish history: the massacre of Armenians
during the First World War and recent guerrilla fighting in Turkey’s
overwhelmingly Kurdish southeast.

In an ironic twist the announcement today of his win comes at the
same time French MPs voted to approve a draft law that would make
it a criminal offence to deny that Turkish massacres of Armenians in
1915-17 constituted genocide.

Pamuk’s prize marked the first time that a writer from a predominantly
Muslim country has been honoured for literature since 1988, when the
award went to Egyptian Naguib Mahfouz, who died in August.

Pinar Kur, a leading female Turkish novelist said: "For years,
everybody has wished someone from Turkey would win the Nobel.

But it is also known, both in Turkey and abroad, that this prize is
much more related to politics than to literature, it is given more
for political reasons.

It is very unfortunate that this prize announcement was made on the
same day as the [Armenian genocide] Bill in France."

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

French Bill On Armenia Genocide Draws Anger

FRENCH BILL ON ARMENIA GENOCIDE DRAWS ANGER
By Martin Arnold in Paris and Vincent Boland in Ankara

Financial Times, UK
Oct 12 2006

Published: October 12 2006 17:24 | Last updated: October 12 2006 17:24

France’s national assembly on Thursday approved legislation making it
a crime to deny that Armenians suffered a genocide during the Ottoman
empire, provoking a furious reaction from Turkey and adding to doubts
over Ankara’s bid to join the European Union.

The vote triggered anger in Turkey, reflecting a growing feeling
among politicians, officials and commentators that France was now
permanently opposed to Ankara’s bid to join the European Union.

Bulent Arinc, speaker of parliament, criticised France’s "hostile
attitude" towards Turkey.

The bill may never become law as it must still be approved by the
senate, France’s upper house of parliament, and signed by president
Jacques Chirac, who is opposed to the initiative and whose government
ultimately controls the agenda of the senate.

But French historians condemned it as counter-productive, comparing
it with a contentious law forcing schools to teach the positive side
of French colonial history, which was repealed this year.

Only minutes after the vote, Orhan Pamuk, Turkey’s best-known novelist,
was awarded the Nobel prize for literature. Mr Pamuk was once put on
trial for saying in an interview that nobody in Turkey dared mention
the Armenian genocide.

"This is a shameful decision," said Mr Arinc. "We are very sorry to
see that this [bill] was passed only because of internal [French]
politics."

Hurriyet, the leading Turkish newspaper, ran a front page headline
"Liberte, egalite, stupidite." Ankara politicians have threatened to
retaliate with economic sanctions and even toyed with a law making
it a crime to deny that North Africans were massacred by French
colonial rulers.

The vote exposed deep divisions at the top of France’s government
against a background of rising French public opposition to Turkey’s
bid to join the EU.

Politicians in Paris are split on the issue, with Mr Chirac in
favour, but prominent ministers like Nicolas Sarkozy are firmly
opposed. Segolène Royal, the Socialists’ leading presidential
candidate, has sat on the fence, saying this week she would defer to
public opinion on the Turkish question.

Catherine Colonna, minister of European affairs and former spokeswoman
for Mr Chirac, condemned the bill on Thursday. She was jeered in
the national assembly for saying: "It is not for the law to re-write
history."

The vote had little impact in Turkey’s financial markets. But diplomats
and political commentators said French companies could be frozen
out of the bidding as Turkey prepares to build three nuclear power
stations and to replace parts of its defence infrastructure.

Passage of the bill also makes it much harder for the EU to push
Turkey to reform or abolish article 301, the clause in the penal code
that allows prosecution of writers and journalists. Richard Howitt,
an MEP with a close interest in Turkey, said it would be "the worst
kind of hypocrisy and provocation" for France to insist that Turkey
"do as we say, not as we do."

Mr Chirac said on a visit to Armenia at the start of the month
that Turkish recognition of the Armenian genocide should become a
pre-condition of EU membership.

The Armenian issue is particularly sensitive in France because of its
450,000-strong Armenian community, which has grown increasingly rich
and influential. Armenians claim up to 1.5m people died in 1915-18.

Turkey denies genocide, and admits only that hundreds of thousands
of both Armenians and Turks died, largely as a result of civil war
and famine.

Patrick Devedjian, a UMP deputy and adviser to Mr Sarkozy, who has
led the push on the right for the bill, said: "Turkey cannot give
us lessons about repressing public opinion, as it was the Erdogan
government that adopted the law 301, putting people in prison just
for talking about the genocide."

France has strong economic ties with Turkey. About 250 French companies
operate there, including Renault, Danone and Carrefour.

France is the fifth exporter to Turkey with $4.7bn of French goods
sold there in 2005.

–Boundary_(ID_wql0CuLeYGnH1S7Pf6ciyQ)–

Q&A: Armenian ‘Genocide’

Q&A: ARMENIAN ‘GENOCIDE’

BBC News, UK
Oct 12 2006

Arguments have raged for decades about the Armenian deaths

French MPs have passed a bill making it a crime to deny that the
Ottoman Turkish empire committed genocide against Armenians in 1915.

The decision has delighted Armenians and infuriated Turks.

Why put "genocide" in inverted commas?

Whether or not the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Armenians during
World War I amounted to genocide is a matter for heated debate. Some
countries have declared that a genocide took place, but others have
resisted calls to do so.

What happened?

During World War I, as the Ottoman Turkish empire fought Russian
forces, some of the Armenian minority in eastern Anatolia sided with
the Russians.

Turkey took reprisals. On 24 April 1915 it rounded up and killed
hundreds of Armenian community leaders.

In May 1915, the Armenian minority, two or three million strong, was
forcefully deported and marched from the Anatolian borders towards
Syria and Mesopotamia (now Iraq). Many died en route.

What does Armenia say?

Armenia says 1.5 million Armenians were killed in this period, either
through systematic massacres or through starvation.

It alleges that a deliberate genocide was carried out by the Ottoman
Turkish empire.

What does Turkey say?

It says there was no genocide.

It acknowledges that many Armenians died, but says Turks died too,
and that massacres were committed on both sides as a result of
inter-ethnic violence and the wider World War.

What is genocide?

Article Two of the UN Convention on Genocide of December 1948 describes
genocide as carrying out acts intended "to destroy, in whole or in
part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group".

What do others say?

France, Russia, Canada and Uruguay are among those countries which
have formally recognised genocide against the Armenians.

The UK, US and Israel are among those that use different terminology.

Why does the row continue?

Armenians are one of the world’s most dispersed peoples. While in
Armenia, Genocide Memorial Day is commemorated across the country,
it is the diaspora that has lobbied for recognition from the outside
world. The killings are regarded as the seminal event of modern
Armenian history, and one that binds the diaspora together.

In Turkey, the penal code makes calling "for the recognition of
the Armenian genocide" illegal. Writers and translators have been
prosecuted for attempting to stimulate debate on the subject.

Turkey has condemned countries that recognise the Armenian genocide,
and was furious when the French parliament passed a bill outlawing
denial of it.

The European Union has said that accepting the Armenian genocide is
not a condition for Turkey’s entry into the bloc. But some, including
French President Jacques Chirac, have said it should be.

Greece On Turkey’s EU Obligations

GREECE ON TURKEY’S EU OBLIGATIONS

Athens News Agency, Greece
Oct 12 2006

Greece on Thursday reiterated that European Union hopeful Turkey must
recognise EU member-state Cyprus as soon as possible.

In a regular weekly press briefing, foreign ministry spokesman George
Koumoutsakos referred to a paradox, as he said, in Turkey’s quest for
EU membership, namely, the fact that it continues to not recognise
a country that is a member in an organisation it wants to join,
something he termed "paradoxical and irrational".

Conversely, the spokesman said the upcoming period will allow for
opportunities to "lift this paradox".

Asked about the screening of Turkey’s ongoing EU accession process,
Koumoutsakos said the chapter on "business and industrial policy" was
discussed at a work group level within the EU recently, and that the
Greek side had aired certain "substantive concerns" over technical
issues. He added that the Cypriot side had expressed a negative
opinion, leading to the tabling of relevant discussions for the future.

Meanwhile, the foreign ministry spokesman declined to comment on
the substance of a recent initiative by the Finnish EU presidency
vis-?-vis the Cyprus issue and Turkey’s stance, merely noting that
the action aims to seek input by all interested sides. He also said
that Athens has a standing position over the matter and does not wish
to enter a reasoning of ‘trade-offs’.

Finally, Koumoutsakos was again asked about Wednesday’s somewhat
eyebrow-raising quip by his counterpart at the Turkish foreign
ministry, Namik Tan, who reportedly responded to Koumoutsakos’
allusion to the ubiquitous "train crash" metaphor – a leitmotif
in press reports and European leaders’ comments about EU-Turkey
relations over the recent period – by saying that "Greece’s specialty
are airplane accidents. I would advice him (Koumoutsakos) to stick
with those instead of train accidents".

"I must tell you, because I know him, that Mr. Tan is a gentleman,
and for this reason his statement surprised me," Koumoutsakos said,
while declining to comment further. The spokesman’s exact statement
in Athens was: "Turkey will not derail if it follows the tracks…"

In an ANA-MPA dispatch from Istanbul later on Thursday, Tan told an
ANA-MPA correspondent that his comments were misinterpreted.

"My statements had absolutely no intention of provoking or irritating,"
he said, while adding that he has repeatedly in the past highlighted
the positive side of Greek-Turkish relations and has made systematic
efforts to clear-up possible misunderstandings between Athens and
Ankara.

Comment on French decision

Meanwhile, in an unrelated development, Koumoutsakos was asked about
Thursday’s decision by the French National Assembly to pass a law
making it a crime to deny that ethnic Armenians suffered genocide at
the hands of Ottoman Turks during World War I.

"It is well known that the Greek parliament adopted a 1996 resolution
condemning the Armenian genocide. At the same time, we believe that
in the modern world the past must not be an obstacle for the future."