Is Gagik Tsarukyan more dangerous than Chechen militants?

Is Tsarukyan Gagik more dangerous than Chechen militants?

So, in October 2002, Chechen militants seized Moscow’s “Nord Ost” theater center and took 916 citizens hostage. On the morning of October 26, Russian services launched an attack on the center. According to publicly available information, the total number of participants in the actual attack and its support was several hundred people. If we also take into account the number of personnel of the blockade, evacuation, medical brigades and other services involved, then the total number of participants in the liberation of “Nord Ost” was about 1000 people.

Let’s go back to today’s Armenia. “Araratcement”, brandy factory, gas stations, private house… According to the news, more than 70 addresses belonging to Tsarukyan Gagik are being searched simultaneously. Can you imagine what kind of human resource we are talking about? For a moment, I looked at the views of the search of Tsarukyan Gagik’s mansion. I counted 9-10 armed and masked people “to the teeth” only at the entrance of the mansion. And how many such people are there in the other parts of the mansion, around the mansion, after all, inside the mansion? In addition, there are law enforcement officers who are watching the mansion “from the outside”.


Let me remind you that we are talking only about the number of persons participating in the search of Tsarukyan Gagik’s private house. Now imagine “Araratcement”, the Brandy factory and the remaining 70 addresses.

Even if we assume that 25-30 people participate in the search at each address, it will turn out that around 2000 armed and masked law enforcement officers are involved in today’s “event”.

Now let’s compare the numbers of the participants in the neutralization of the Chechen militants and the searches of the territories of Tsarukyan Gagik. We will find out that Tsarukyan Gagik is much more dangerous than the Chechen militants.


Public figure Karen Hekimyan




—

The opposition parties will issue a statement on Tsarukyan’s case

Searches were completed in “Ararat Cement”, “Multi Wellness”, Yerevan Ararat Cognac, Wine, Vodka Combine, “Multi Stone” companies, “Olympavan” and the National Olympic Committee of Armenia. This was stated by his spokesperson, deputy candidate Iveta Tonoyan, in front of the house of PAP leader Gagik Tsarukyan.


“I regret to announce that the National Olympic Committee of Armenia has been bankrupted and its activities have been stopped. This is a shame of the international level, because this causes a lot of damage to Armenia’s international reputation. There was no such precedent in the world. I am more than sure that the RA authorities and the people who have taken responsibility for this whole process will see the disastrous consequences of this operation in a very short period of time.


The “Araratcement” factory, the Yerevan Ararat cognac, wine, vodka combine, the administrative building next to the combine, the high tower in front of the municipality, were also painted over. The administrative building was also repaired, there are the offices and accounting of the “Multi Group” concern.


The “Multi Stone” company, which is engaged in the production of stones, has also been bankrupted and its activities have been stopped. Actions are still going on in “Olympavan”, but we have a problem there, because the USA wrestling team was training there, we have a UFC world champion who was training there, and serious problems have arisen in that regard.


The searches are continuing at the “Multi Grand” hotel in “Paravan”.


All those companies, in particular, “Ararat Cement” factory, “Multi Stone”, “Multi Wellness”, Yerevan Ararat Cognac, Wine, Vodka Combine, which were secured by the Central Committee, all employees were evacuated, including security workers, service staff, which can cause serious security problems, because some of them are factories where there are explosive materials. In this regard, our lawyers are working to start an appeal process, so that at least we can ensure the safety of these institutions,” Tonoyan said, news.am reports.


Let’s remind that since this morning, simultaneous searches are underway in dozens of companies belonging to the family of PAP leader Gagik Tsarukyan.


The investigative committee informed that more than 70 addresses are being searched simultaneously within the framework of more than a dozen criminal proceedings being investigated by the investigative committee.  


Iveta Tonoyan also noted that since early morning, representatives of various parties have been calling, offering words of support, willingness to listen.


“Personally, I have spoken with representatives of many forces and as far as I know, they are going to make a statement.”


To the question: if Tsarukyan had not participated in the election process, would all this have happened to him, he answered.


“Gagik Tsarukyan makes decisions about his activities, participation in “Prosperous Armenia” and all other issues personally. In this case, too, Gagik Tsarukyan made a decision to participate in the elections, because as an Armenian, a compassionate person could not just sit idly by and be indifferent, seeing all the processes that, unfortunately, are taking place in post-war Armenia.


I don’t tend to be guided by “ifs”, but we all understand that this process was specifically threatened by physical reprisals, economic reprisals, and political reprisals, especially during the pre-election period. Gagik Tsarukyan was never aggressive in this whole process, he responded to the threats and insults, he said hundreds of times that he will not drop his class, but even after his admonitions, inappropriate and non-political rhetoric was always heard, some of which Gagik Tsarukyan, yes, had to address with that terminology.”

—

Fellowship Opportunity for Artists of the Future | Fellowship opportunity

Creative Armenia
Arts foundation for the Armenian people.

Creative Armenia is pleased to announce the open call for the 2026 Creative Innovation Fellowship. Supported by the Vahé Fattal Fund in partnership with L’Œuvre d’Orient, the 10-month program is designed to empower Armenian artists working at the intersection of art and technology. It will provide five artists with €5,000 in funding, along with mentorships and workshops, to help them develop and realize their creative projects.


🔗 Learn more and apply here: creativearmenia.org/creative-innovation-fellowship

📅 Application deadline: July 12, 2026, at 11:59 PM Yerevan time

—

Creative Armenia announces an open call for 2026.Creative Innovation Fellowshipfor the program. This 10-month program, supported by Vahe Fattal Foundation and in cooperation with L’Œuvre d’Orient organization, will support Armenian artists working at the intersection of art and technology. The 5 selected artists will receive a grant of 5,000 euros, individual mentorship and professional workshops for the development and implementation of their creative projects.

🔗 Learn more and apply here:creativearmenia.org/creative-innovation-fellowship

📅The deadline for receiving applications is 2026. July 12 at 23:59 (Yerevan time).


—

For Inquiries:
Communications Manager  
Narine Harutyunyan / [email protected]

Creative Armenia
Arts foundation for the Armenian people. 
creativearmenia.org
   

—

California Courier Online, July 6, 2026

California
Courier Online, July 6, 2026

1- Pashinyan, Erdogan and Aliyev are Unhappy

By Harut
Sassounian

TheCaliforniaCourier.com
2- The Academy’s Chief Oscars Officer Teni Melidonian Steps Down

3- Mary Vardanyan, 112-Year-Old Armenian Genocide Survivor, Passes Away
4- U.S. House of Representatives Names Glendale Post Office After Paul Ignatius (Iknadossian)
5- Armenian Expats To Lose Voting Rights
6- Prof. Tamar Shirinian gets $1.9 million settlement after dismissal from University of Tennessee
7- Painting of Mount Ararat removed from Armenian president’s office

*************************************************************************************

1- Pashinyan, Erdogan and Aliyev are Unhappy

*************************************************************************************

2– The Academy’s Chief Oscars Officer Teni Melidonian Steps Down

*************************************************************************************

3- Mary Vardanyan, 112-Year-Old Armenian Genocide Survivor, Passes Away

Mary Vardanyan, one of the last known survivors of the Armenian Genocide, has died at the age of 112. The news was announced by her granddaughter, Natalie Vardanyan, in a Facebook post.

Vardanyan was born in the city of Aintab in Cilicia. Her earliest childhood memories were marked by the horrors of the Armenian Genocide, memories that remained with her throughout her life.

Together with the surviving members of her family, she found refuge in Aleppo. She preserved the carpet weaving and handicraft traditions of Aintab, and her works were later exhibited at the museum of the Catholicosate of the Great House of Cilicia in Antelias.

In 1935, she married Aintab-born violinist and composer Hovhannes Vardanyan. The couple had six children. She was widowed in 1969 and never remarried.

In 1972, Vardanyan moved to the United States with her son and settled in Watertown, where she lived for about 45 years.

*************************************************************************************

4- U.S. House of Representatives Names Glendale Post Office After
Paul Ignatius (Iknadossian)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. House of Representatives adopted
legislation introduced by Congresswoman Laura Friedman (CA-30) to designate the
United States Postal Office in Glendale, California, as the “Paul Ignatius Post
Office.” The bipartisan measure, previously championed by Rep. Adam Schiff
(D-CA) in the 117th Congress, honors former Secretary of the Navy Paul
Ignatius, whose extraordinary lifetime of public service, leadership, and
dedication to the nation has left an enduring legacy.
“We applaud the House for passing this well-deserved tribute
to Secretary Paul Ignatius,” stated Armenian Assembly Executive Director Bryan
Ardouny. “As the son of Armenian immigrants, Secretary Ignatius rose to become
one of our nation’s most respected public servants, serving with honor as
Secretary of the Navy and inspiring generations through his integrity,
patriotism, and unwavering commitment to the common good. We commend Congresswoman
Laura Friedman for advancing this bipartisan legislation.”
During House consideration of the legislation, Congresswoman
Friedman paid tribute to Secretary Ignatius’ remarkable career and enduring
contributions to the United States, underscoring the profound impact of his
leadership and service.
In September 2023, the Armenian Assembly presented Secretary
Ignatius with the George Deukmejian Award during a tribute in Washington, D.C.,
attended by Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, Senator Gary Peters, Congresswoman
Anna Eshoo, Members of Congress, Administration officials, military leaders,
and community members. At the event, Pelosi praised Secretary Ignatius’
patriotism and described him as an “example of the American Dream,” while
Assembly leadership highlighted his distinguished service in the Kennedy and
Johnson Administrations, his tenure as Secretary of the Navy, and his continued
leadership in the private sector and civic life.
Born in Glendale, California, to Armenian parents from the
Kharpert region, Secretary Ignatius devoted his life to serving the United
States with distinction. Throughout his career, he was deeply proud of his
Armenian heritage, but he knew that his duty was always to represent the
interests of the United States with unwavering commitment. In addition to
serving as Secretary of the Navy from 1967 to 1969, he held senior leadership
positions in both government and the private sector, including as President of
The Washington Post and President of the Air Transport Association.
Upon his passing on November 6, 2025, a memorial service
took place in December 2025 at the Washington National Cathedral. He was later
laid to rest at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia.

5- Armenian Expats To Lose Voting Rights
Karlen Aslanian

6– Prof. Tamar Shirinian gets $1.9 million settlement after dismissal from University of Tennessee

Lawyerdamages.com

University approved $1.9M settlement with professor fired for criticizing assassinated activist.

The University of Tennessee at Knoxville approved a $1.9 million settlement with Tamar Shirinian, a former Assistant Professor of Anthropology who was dismissed from her position following a critical social media comment about conservative activist Charlie Kirk. On June 30, 2026, the university’s Board of Trustees voted to settle her retaliation lawsuit, which alleged that the institution violated her constitutional rights when it terminated her employment in response to her post. Shirinian had called Kirk a “disgusting psychopath” in a comment posted after Kirk’s assassination in September 2025, and the university subsequently fired her, leading to her legal action against the chancellor, the state university system president, and the faculty senate president.

The settlement represents a significant acknowledgment of the university’s legal exposure in the case, though it comes with notable conditions that limit its scope. Importantly, the agreement does not restore Shirinian to her former position at the university, meaning she will receive financial compensation but will not return to teaching or research at the institution. However, the settlement remains conditional—state officials must still approve the agreement before it becomes final and binding, adding an additional layer of uncertainty to the case outcome.

The sequence of events leading to this settlement began with a social media comment Shirinian made in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination in September 2025. Kirk, a prominent conservative activist, had been killed, and in the immediate aftermath, Shirinian posted a response on a public platform characterizing him as a “disgusting psychopath.” Rather than keeping her opinion private, she published her thoughts where university administrators, students, and the broader public could see them. The university’s response was swift and severe—Shirinian was dismissed from her position as Assistant Professor of Anthropology within a relatively short timeframe. The central legal question became whether the university fired her for legitimate institutional reasons or whether the dismissal constituted retaliation for her exercise of free speech.

Shirinian’s attorneys argued that the university had violated her First Amendment rights and her constitutional protections as a public employee. Public employees, including faculty at state universities, retain certain constitutional safeguards that prevent employers from terminating them solely for speech on matters of public concern made outside their official duties. The lawsuit targeted multiple institutional defendants, including the university chancellor, the state university system president, and the faculty senate president, indicating that Shirinian’s legal team viewed the retaliation as institutional rather than isolated. The case illustrates a critical distinction in employment law: an institution’s ability to maintain discipline and institutional reputation does not automatically override an employee’s constitutional right to speak on public matters during personal time. Universities cannot simply claim that controversial speech is inconsistent with institutional values and terminate employment without legal consequences when the speech addresses matters of genuine public concern.

Constitutional Free Speech Rights in Academic Settings

The lawsuit hinged on whether a public university can lawfully terminate a professor for statements made outside the classroom on personal time. courts evaluating such cases typically examine whether the speech addressed a matter of public concern, whether the employee spoke as a citizen rather than in an official institutional capacity, and whether the public interest in the employee’s speech outweighs the employer’s institutional interests in avoiding disruption or reputational harm. In Shirinian’s case, Charlie Kirk’s assassination was undoubtedly a matter of public concern, and her comment, while harsh, engaged directly with that significant public event. The complication arises from the conflict between institutional autonomy and employee free speech protection. Some argue that universities have legitimate interests in distancing themselves from faculty members’ inflammatory language to protect institutional reputation, while others contend that permitting termination based on off-duty speech creates a chilling effect on faculty _expression_ and academic freedom.

This tension reveals a fundamental limitation of employment law: institutions frequently assert “bringing the institution into disrepute” or “violation of institutional values” as justification for adverse action, making it difficult for employees to predict which statements will result in termination. A warning for academics and other public employees is that these institutional claims increasingly serve as pretexts for punishing controversial political speech without clear, predictable boundaries. The legal framework protecting Shirinian’s speech depends partly on whether a court would find that her comment’s harshness or inflammatory language outweighed the public interest in her speech. Some institutions have successfully argued that certain speech, even on public matters, was so disruptive or offensive that termination was justified. Shirinian’s case appears to have survived this argument, given the settlement, but the analysis remains fact-specific and uncertain.

Retaliation Claims in Higher Education Employment

Shirinian’s core legal claim was retaliation—the assertion that the university would not have dismissed her but for her protected speech. Retaliation claims typically require showing that the employee engaged in protected conduct and that an adverse action was causally connected to that conduct. The temporal proximity between her social media comment and her firing, combined with the clear causal nexus between her criticism of Kirk and the university’s stated or implied reason for termination, supported the inference of retaliation. The $1.9 million settlement approval by the Board of Trustees signals that the university’s legal counsel determined the retaliation claim had substantial merit—substantial enough to warrant significant financial settlement rather than continued litigation. Universities face considerable legal costs defending employment disputes, particularly those involving constitutional claims.

Years of litigation, depositions, expert testimony, and the risk of a jury verdict exceeding the settlement amount create strong financial incentives to resolve. From the university’s perspective, paying $1.9 million may prove less expensive than defending the case through trial and potential appeal. This financial calculus illustrates how institutions often weigh the measurable cost of settlement against the uncertain costs and risks of litigation. For employees in similar situations, Shirinian’s case demonstrates that retaliation claims against public institutions are viable when the speech involves matters of public concern and the adverse action follows closely after the protected _expression_. However, the settlement’s failure to restore her professional position reveals a significant limitation: financial compensation, while substantial, cannot fully restore the professional trajectory, institutional affiliation, research opportunities, or academic community that she lost.

Settlement Approval Structure and State Oversight

The Board of Trustees approved the settlement on June 30, 2026, but this approval is not the final or binding step. State officials must still grant approval before the agreement becomes effective and the $1.9 million payment is released to Shirinian. This additional approval requirement reflects the public nature of the dispute and the fact that state funds will satisfy the settlement. State officials reviewing the settlement may evaluate whether the university’s settlement decision was prudent, whether it establishes problematic precedents for future disputes, and whether the amount is reasonable given the underlying claims.

This multi-stage approval process creates both advantages and uncertainties. For Shirinian, pending state approval introduces uncertainty about whether the settlement will ultimately proceed as negotiated, preventing her from considering the matter fully resolved until the state acts. For the university, state approval offers additional oversight and potential legitimacy through independent review, though rejection by state officials would return the case to litigation. Comparing this to private employment disputes illustrates the key difference: when private employers settle cases, the agreement is binding once both parties execute it. When public institutions settle, the presence of state oversight and public funds creates additional procedural layers that can strengthen the settlement’s legitimacy or introduce new obstacles to finalization.

Financial Settlements and Their Limitations in Employment Cases

While $1.9 million is a substantial sum, the settlement’s structure reveals important limitations in using monetary compensation alone to resolve employment disputes. Shirinian receives financial payment but not reinstatement—the settlement explicitly does not restore her to her former position as Assistant Professor of Anthropology. She will not return to teaching, conducting research, or maintaining her institutional affiliation at the University of Tennessee. For many academics, the loss of these professional elements exceeds the significance of financial compensation alone. A critical warning about employment settlements is that they provide financial relief without fully addressing the underlying professional injury.

Shirinian lost her career trajectory at the institution, her participation in the academic community, her access to research resources and graduate students, and her standing in her discipline at UTK. An assistant professor dismissed mid-career faces substantial challenges in reestablishing herself elsewhere, particularly when prospective employers learn the circumstances of her dismissal. Money compensates for lost wages and some benefits, but it cannot restore professional standing or the trajectory that her dismissal interrupted. Settlements frequently include confidentiality provisions that prevent the employee from publicly discussing the case or underlying facts. If Shirinian’s settlement contains such provisions, they would limit her ability to speak publicly about her experience or to contribute to broader conversations about free speech and institutional retaliation in academic settings. This represents another substantial limitation: while monetary settlements address financial damages, they often silence the employee’s voice regarding institutional conduct and constrain public discourse about the issues the case raises.

First Amendment Protections for Academic Employees

As faculty at a state university, Shirinian held First Amendment protections that private sector employees do not possess. The Supreme Court has established that public employees cannot be fired for speech on matters of public concern unless the employer’s interest in maintaining discipline and efficiency substantially outweighs the employee’s interest in speaking. Applying this framework to Shirinian required examining whether her comment about Charlie Kirk addressed a matter of public concern and whether the university could establish that her speech disrupted institutional operations. Charlie Kirk’s assassination was undoubtedly a matter of significant public concern, and Shirinian’s comment, though harshly worded, engaged directly with that public event.

Her statement was made on personal time and not in her capacity as an instructor. She did not use university resources or platforms in a way that exploited her position. These factors typically support constitutional protection. However, a critical limitation is that institutions can assert reputational harm or institutional interests that purportedly justify adverse action, making clear protection difficult to predict or guarantee.

Patterns in Higher Education Retaliation Cases

Shirinian’s case is not isolated in higher education. Universities have faced numerous lawsuits from faculty alleging retaliation for political speech or controversial statements made outside the classroom. Cases involving dismissal or discipline following professors’ public statements about contentious political figures, social movements, or policy questions have generated significant litigation and settlement activity.

These cases reveal a pattern in which universities initially take aggressive action against faculty for politically controversial speech, but subsequently face substantial legal exposure when courts examine the free speech implications of those actions. The $1.9 million settlement reflects a serious institutional commitment of public funds to resolve the dispute, likely reflecting both the strength of Shirinian’s constitutional claims and the university’s desire to avoid extended litigation and the risk of a larger judgment. The case demonstrates that universities face genuine legal and financial consequences when they terminate faculty for protected speech, and that substantial settlements can result from such disputes even before trial or appellate review.

*************************************************************************************
7- Painting of Mount Ararat removed from Armenian president’s office

*************************************************************************************

If you wish
to read daily updated Armenian news and commentary,

Please send
me your email address: [email protected]

Website:
TheCaliforniaCourier.com

*************************************************************************************

—

Azerbaijan issues rare rebuke against key ally Israel over Armenian genocide r

Middle East Eye

June 29 2026
29 June 2026 11:04 BST

The Israeli government’s decision on Sunday to formally recognise the Armenian genocide has drawn a rare rebuke from Azerbaijan, a close Israeli ally.

In an official statement, Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry called the recognition a “distortion of the historical facts” and “the reduction of a complex historical issue to a political decision”.

It called on the Israeli government to reconsider this “unacceptable” decision.

Turkey, in a separate statement on Sunday, said the Israeli decision was a convenient way to distract public opinion from the fact that the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli officials over alleged crimes in Gaza.

Azerbaijan and Israel have close ties, and Baku is one of Israel’s major oil suppliers, while Israel sells advanced weaponry to the Azerbaijani government.

Turkey and Azerbaijan also see each other as close allies. Under the 2021 Shusha Declaration, both sides are obliged to support each other if either is attacked by a foreign party.

Last year, Baku sought to ease tensions between Turkey and Israel over Syria and Gaza by hosting talks between the two sides.

READ ALSO

—

Armenia passes law restricting eligibility of diaspora voters

OC Media
July 2026

—

Canberra marks 111 years since the Armenian, Greek and Assyrian Genocides

Greek Herald
July 6 2026

 

·

Community leaders, politicians, academics and members of the Armenian, Greek and Assyrian communities gathered at the Hellenic Club of Canberra on Thursday, July 2, to mark the 111th anniversary of the Armenian, Greek and Assyrian Genocides.

The annual commemoration, jointly organised by the Armenian National Committee of Australia (ANC-AU) and the Canberra Association of Pontos ‘Trapezounta’, honoured the memory of the more than 2.5 million Armenians, Greeks and Assyrians who lost their lives during the genocidal campaigns of the Ottoman Empire between 1915 and 1923, while reaffirming calls for truth, remembrance and legislative recognition.

The evening brought together diplomatic representatives, parliamentarians and community leaders from across the ACT and interstate, including Greek Ambassador Stavros Venizelos, Cyprus Deputy High Commissioner Nikos Varellas, ACT Minister for Multicultural Affairs Michael Pettersson MLA, Deputy Leader of the ACT Greens Andrew Braddock MLA, Brindabella MLA Caitlin Tough, Federation of Pontian Associations of Australia Co-President and Pontoxeniteas NSW President Maria Anthony, Greek Community of Canberra President John Loukadellis, Kytherian Association of Canberra President Fotis Samios, as well as representatives from Armenian, Assyrian, Jewish and Christian organisations.

Guests also heard from distinguished academics including Dr Panayiotis Diamadis and Sam Topalidis, while the keynote address was delivered by genocide scholar Dr Deborah Mayersen, Senior Lecturer in International and Political Studies at UNSW Canberra at the Australian Defence Force Academy.

Dr Mayersen, whose research focuses on genocide studies and prevention, reflected on the historical significance of the Armenian Genocide in the development of international genocide law and emphasised the importance of remembrance and recognition in preventing future atrocities.

The ceremony also featured a survivor testimony, recognising that while no survivors of the Armenian, Greek or Assyrian Genocides remain in Australia, their descendants continue to preserve and share their stories. Attendees viewed the testimony of Armenian Genocide survivor Verjin Cholakian, whose experiences served as a reminder of the lasting human impact of the atrocities.

Throughout the evening, speakers reflected on the resilience of the Armenian, Greek and Assyrian peoples, paying tribute to the generations who rebuilt their lives after persecution while stressing the responsibility of future generations to ensure the genocides are never forgotten.

Organisers also highlighted the ongoing campaign for legislative recognition of the genocides in the ACT, urging elected representatives to continue supporting efforts to acknowledge historical truth and condemn genocide in all its forms.

The commemoration concluded with thanks to the many volunteers, community organisations and supporters whose advocacy continues to keep the memory of the victims alive more than a century after the events.

—

Tough start for U16s in Eurobasket with 109-56 defeat at hands of hosts Armeni

Gibraltar Chronicle
July 5 2026

 

Gibraltar U16s’ first outing in the U16 EuroBasket Division C Championship saw them face Armenia in what proved to be a quick reality check on the challenges of international competition.
The second day of the tournament, and Gibraltar’s opening match, saw Armenia dominate the first quarter with a 36-11 lead, immediately underlining their quality.
Although facing a stronger side in terms of both quality and overall performance, Gibraltar did not yield. Armenia had been expected to provide a difficult opening test, with the hosts among the favourites in Group B alongside Malta.
Determined to keep their heads high, Gibraltar responded well in the second quarter, limiting Armenia’s scoring opportunities during the opening minutes while creating chances of their own in an attempt to reduce the deficit.
Some good rebounding and high-pressure defending high up the court provided Gibraltar with several strong defensive moments, helping them add their first points of the second quarter while Armenia remained scoreless for the opening two minutes. This gave the Gibraltar team added confidence.
It was not until almost five minutes into the second quarter that Armenia scored again, with Gibraltar showing their ability to adapt to the pace of the game and pose a challenge of their own, although it was not enough against such strong opposition.
It was a steep learning curve. Despite their improved performance, Gibraltar were unable to make a significant dent in the deficit. Armenia capitalised when they broke Gibraltar’s momentum, extending their advantage once again.
With four minutes remaining before half-time, Armenia led 46-21.
Although their confidence had been dented after seeing their efforts produce little reward, Gibraltar’s response remained admirable as they battled for every ball, making life as difficult as possible for their opponents despite falling further behind on the scoreboard.
Quick, disciplined and efficient passing, combined with a strong counterattack, saw Armenia finish the second quarter leading 60-27.
The hosts were firmly in control, having already demonstrated they were among the group favourites after defeating Andorra 98-62 the previous evening.
In the other Group B match, Malta beat Monaco 107-73. The high-scoring nature of both matches was something Gibraltar would need to bear in mind as they looked ahead to their remaining group fixtures.
After winning the opening quarter 36-11, Armenia, despite being held scoreless for almost the first five minutes of the second period, still won the quarter 24-16.
There was little doubt as to who controlled the pace of the match, with Armenia imposing themselves from the opening minutes of the third quarter to extend their lead to 70-27 before Gibraltar responded.
Armenia’s aggressive high press limited Gibraltar’s attacks to only a handful of opportunities during the early stages of the third quarter. They stole possession repeatedly, with only their finishing preventing them from reaching the 80-point mark even sooner, showing that even at this level they could miss relatively straightforward baskets.
Having been put under relentless pressure, Gibraltar once again showed admirable resilience, continuing to battle and adding to their own tally.
With four minutes remaining in the third quarter, the score stood at 77-32 after Armenia had looked set to pull even further away.
Armenia continued to showcase their quality, moving 87-34 ahead with just two minutes remaining in the third quarter. A three-point basket from well beyond the arc was converted with the confidence of senior-level basketball.
With every major score celebrated over the public address system, Gibraltar were also facing an atmosphere they were unaccustomed to, adding further pressure.
The third quarter ended 90-38. The only positive for Gibraltar was that they had prevented Armenia from matching their first-quarter scoring total.
Having seen Malta surpass the 100-point mark against Monaco, there was little doubt Armenia would also be aiming to reach a century in order to maintain a strong points difference.
However, the advantage they had already built was more than enough as they maintained their defensive intensity and continued to limit Gibraltar’s scoring opportunities.
Three minutes into the final quarter, Gibraltar had yet to add to their score while Armenia edged closer to the 100-point mark.
Armenia eventually claimed a 109-56 victory.
Although it was a steep learning curve with which to begin their campaign, this was never expected to be the match in which Gibraltar would make their mark. Both Armenia and Malta had been anticipated to provide extremely difficult opposition. Gibraltar next face Malta, with their hopes largely resting on the remaining group matches against Monaco and Andorra before the classification play-offs.

—

Save Armenia: Standing with the first Christian nation

MediaMax, Armenia
July 6 2026

The true measure of peace is not found in the signing of an accord, but in security, stability, and lasting change on the ground. This belief drives Save Armenia, a US-based nonprofit founded by James Tufenkian, in its response to the existential crises Armenia is facing.

 

Dedicated to uniting American Christians in defense of the world’s first Christian nation, Save Armenia recently brought another distinguished delegation to the country from June 14–19. The group included prominent Christian leaders, elected officials, human rights advocates, journalists, and business executives.

 

The delegation engaged directly with local officials, forcibly displaced Artsakh Armenians, and war victims. They traveled throughout the countryside to visit ancient Armenian churches. The delegation was also received by His Holiness Karekin II, Catholicos of All Armenians, at the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin.

 

Mediamax spoke with two members of the delegation, Chief Executive Officer of Save Armenia Dr. Paul Murray and Georgia State Senator Emanuel Jones, about the purpose of their visit and the results of their recent research on peace realities on the ground. 

 

Standing with the first Christian nation 

 

Dr. Paul Murray 

 

I grew up in Massachusetts, United States. When I was 12 years old, my father was working for the state’s governor. At the time, Lebanese Armenians were facing persecution in Lebanon. They were looking for a safe place and wanted to come to the United States. My father began working to bring them to the U.S., offering them the new start they were seeking.

 

As a 12-year-old boy, I knew little about my father’s work until we were invited into home of that Lebanese Armenians. I listened to the mothers and fathers talk about their struggles, the immense pressure they faced as Christians, and the hardships they endured. I saw how profoundly grateful they were to my father for giving them a second chance. That seed was planted in me then, and I believe it has come full circle today. Now, as an adult, I find myself working alongside Armenians, just as my father did all those years ago.

When the Artsakh war started in 2020, it became clear — as James Tufenkian pointed out — that we needed to protect the sovereignty of Armenia. Because of my work in the international religious freedom space, I convened the first Armenian working group. We brought together members of the Armenian Embassy in the U.S., the diaspora, and various religious freedom organizations to determine how we could help.

 

Following the tragic events of 2023 — the ethnic cleansing of an entire Christian community of 120,000 people from Artsakh — Save Armenia recognized the urgent need to speak out and defend the Armenian people. Today, our primary focus is on strengthening Armenia, specifically by getting Christian leaders in the United States actively engaged. Our tagline for Save Armenia is: “Standing with the first Christian nation.”

 

The land where the Bible comes to live

 

Senator Emanuel Jones 

 

This is my first time in Armenia, and it feels amazing. From the moment we landed, I knew that something was different about this land. I have learned so much in the last several days that I’ve been here.

During our visit, we went to the Mother Cathedral of Etchmiadzin. I don’t think I was prepared for what I experienced there. In the church’s museum, they had some artifacts that date way back to the very beginning.  

 

Being a Christian, being a deacon in my church, and having grown up in the Baptist faith, I looked at one of the artifacts and I was told that it is the Holy Spear that pierced my Savior, Jesus Christ. It kind of brought me to tears. I am not an emotional kind of person, but that’s just something that takes you right back to the beginning. For me, it was like the Bible coming alive. It was something that I learned in Bible school, something that my teachers talked about. And yet, here it is, right in front of me.

Before coming here, I did not understand what they meant when they said, “This is the first Christian nation.” What does that really mean? But you have to experience it to really see what that means. Just walk on this land, go to the monasteries, walk through the caves, listen to the priests and bishops. Now when Armenians say that they are the first Christian nation, I do know what that means.

 

Looking on the realities of peace accord

 

Dr. Paul Murray 

 

After the signing of the Joint Declaration in Washington on August 8, 2025, everyone was celebrating. We were happy too, as it likely prevented another war.

Save Armenia was initially established to address the ongoing crisis — specifically Azerbaijan seizing land, imprisoning people, and destroying sacred sites. When the peace accord was initialed, we had to rethink how to remain effective. We wanted to talk about the human dignity of every individual in Armenia, the sovereignty of the nation, and the protection of its culture and heritage. And we noticed that those were things that were not addressed by the peace accord.

To understand the situation on the ground, we conducted a comprehensive research of all media — social media, print, radio, and television — coming out of both countries. We wanted to answer two simple questions: Is Azerbaijan working towards peace or against it? Is Armenia working towards peace or against it?

 

Our first analysis came out in early February, and the results were disappointing. While we have seen Armenia transition toward peace, the same cannot be said for Azerbaijan. The hate speech coming from there is terrible.

 

Hate Speech that might lead to new Genocide 

 

Dr. Paul Murray 

 

The president of Azerbaijan speaks of Armenians as subhuman, and this negative rhetoric is present even in schools. How can you build lasting peace or work together alongside that kind of hatred? 

If you look on the grounds of this, you will see that kind of speech leads to a genocide. When you look at the history of the Holocaust, the pre-Holocaust situation, you will see that similar negative image of Jews was being created. This is what Azerbaijan is doing to Armenians today.

 

Senator Emanuel Jones 

 

Growing up in the United States and going to some of the best universities. We learned early on about the Holocaust. I didn’t learn about the atrocities going on over here. To me, this is not much different than what happened with the Holocaust.

We, as God’s children, cannot allow that to happen again.

 

Azerbaijani narratives that work against peace

 

Dr. Paul Murray

 

Another thing that came out strongly in the survey was the so-called “Western Azerbaijan” narrative. It targets the sovereignty of Armenia, claiming a land that the entire international community identifies as Armenia. Yet they push this “Western Azerbaijan” label, hoping that if people hear it enough, they will start believing it. How does that help reconciliation?

There are also Armenian territories occupied by Azerbaijan. Those territories need to be returned.

 

Another indicator we have identified is the release of Armenian POWs and political prisoners. If you are going to talk about peace, the very first thing you should do is release the remaining Armenian hostages.

 

When we talk to government officials, whether it is the Trump administration or the Armenian government, we say that the release of hostages should be a part of the peace accord. I think the concern is that if it becomes part of the peace accord, it would be a deal-breaker for Azerbaijan. But as someone who stands for human rights and religious freedom, I believe this must be at the core of it, because basic human rights are foundational. If that is not there, how can you ever have genuine peace and reconciliation?

At Save Armenia, we are not saying that Azerbaijan and Armenia cannot work together. They can. And one of the great things about the TRIPP project is that it shows the potential of that happening. But until the people see these things taken care of, how do we know in three to five years that this doesn’t come up again?

 

We have our second research coming out and we will make it public to serve as a tool for everyone to see what is really happening.

 

Meeting with the victims of Azerbaijani atrocities

 

Dr. Paul Murray

 

People in Armenia know the story of the Armenian female snipers tortured and killed in Jermuk in 2022. I met the son of one of these women during an after-school program where, with the help of the Tufenkian Foundation, child victims of war and violence receive therapy. This boy now has PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) from what happened to his mother. This young boy’s life has forever changed. He still asks when his mother is coming home. I saw him drawing a really beautiful picture of three geese, but the original picture he was drawing from had only two. I asked why there were three in his drawing, and he replied, “That’s my father, that’s me, and that’s my mother.” Also, when the kids were asked what they want to be when they grow up, this young boy said he wants to be a sniper.

The impact of what Azerbaijan has done does not just impact this generation, but the next generation, which will then impact the generation after that.

 

Senator Emanuel Jones

 

We met some survivors from the genocide in Artsakh, 2023. Unfortunately, they had to relive the horrible experiences that they had, and there was not a dry eye in that room.

Yes, we have violence everywhere, all over the globe. Growing up in Atlanta, Georgia, I know how violence can be. But this is just a different level of violence, a different level of cruelty of man toward man. The moment I met these people, I felt connected to them. And then hearing how they were persecuted, hearing all the horrifying stories… I am telling you, there wasn’t a dry eye in that room.

 

I see a comparison between what my ancestors and I experienced as people of color in America, and what is going on over here in this region. We endured it, and we endured it together.

 

We faced immense struggles, but we knew that we were on the right side of history, the right side of justice. And we were believers. So we persevered. We never gave up. We kept fighting. We fought in the courts. We fought in our communities. We fought to change the laws.

You have got to believe. This is not something that happens overnight. Every generation has to bear the burden. Every generation has to carry the struggle forward until we can all realize that we are one world.

 

How do you bring reconciliation without justice?

 

Dr. Paul Murray

 

Now, some people are saying Artsakh is gone. It is not even a part of the conversation anymore. But I talk to people from Artsakh and listen to their stories, I hear the horrid details of people who have been killed by Azerbaijani forces. For example, there is the story of a woman whose throat they cut with a cross: they forced her necklace into her throat and shot her body after she had died. Those kinds of graphic details are not being talked about.

How do you bring reconciliation if you do not have justice? Justice must be done for all of these people who have had family members killed and who were forced out of their own homeland. They should have the right to return. But when I speak to those from Artsakh, they are afraid to go home. First of all, what has happened to their infrastructure?

 

If you go to Artsakh right now, you will see that they are tearing down the churches and monasteries, destroying the cemeteries and sacred sites — eradicating the whole foundation of a Christian community as if it were never there.

 

How dare they destroy this beauty and what it represents? Because it is not just a building. It is all about the history of the people: baptisms, weddings, funerals, generation after generation. And now they are going to just remove it all as if it was never there. So, they are not just removing the buildings, but they are trying to erase the history.

And these are the issues that we are working to point out and address.

 

We are present

 

Dr. Paul Murray

 

The first thing we do is bring Christian leaders to Armenia to experience the country firsthand and hear from the people themselves, so this is not a secondary account.

 

Every individual who comes to Armenia is a person of influence — someone with a network they can reach — so that they can become a voice for the Armenian people. 

 

In our meetings, we have spoken to the President Trump’s administration and the State Department. We used the International Religious Freedom (IRF) Summit in February to raise these issues. We work, first, to raise awareness; second, to advocate; and third, to compel our government to address these issues as part of the peace accord.

People may say, “You are just a small group.” But as people of faith, we know that God is successful when he uses a remnant. We may be small organization, but the people we bring together are people of quality — men and women of prayer who are willing to use their resources, time, and networks to speak for the people of Armenia.

 

Senator Emanuel Jones

 

We must rally the international community and people of goodwill to come together and demand support.

 

I feel like I was blind until I came here, but now I clearly see what God has bestowed upon this land. I believe this is what James Tufenkian, the founder of Save Armenia, is trying to achieve. He didn’t bring us here just to have a good time, see the sights, learn a little history, and go home. He wanted us to take this experience, make it a part of who we are, and share it within our churches and communities. People need to understand that Christians here are being persecuted, and we cannot allow these atrocities to continue.

I am here, and I am ready to lend whatever support I can — my voice, my time, and my resources. I know many others who feel the same.

 

Dr. Paul Murray

 

As you travel the hillsides of Armenia, you see crosses everywhere. What is unique about Armenia’s monasteries and churches is that, unlike in other European countries where they are primarily tourist attractions, in Armenia, you will always see people inside praying. It is beautiful, and I believe that is the source of Armenia’s enduring strength.

 

Gaiane Yenokian talked to Dr. Paul Murray and Senator Emanuel Jones 

 

Photos by Emin Aristakesyan


—

The (domestic) problem with Armenia’s recent elections

Modern Diplomacy
July 6 2026

Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan has been re-elected to another term after being victorious in his country’s 7 June elections. However, domestic considerations must also be taken into account.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has been re-elected to another term after being victorious in his country’s 7 June elections. His re-election is a relief for Washington and Europe, given Pashinyan’s foreign policy ideologies and objectives. However, his domestic policies are very problematic; the repression and crackdown on freedom of speech leading up to the elections could signal a period of hardship for the Armenian population in the foreseeable future.

The elections in Armenia were closely monitored internationally, as much was at stake at a regional level. The obvious primary foreign policy issue for Armenia is the future of the peace process between Yerevan and the Azerbaijani government; Pashinyan’s re-election was critical to keeping the negotiations between the two neighbors alive. Moreover, given its location in the Caucasus, Armenia could become a critical transportation zone in regional trade networks such as the Middle Corridor; however, to achieve this goal, the Armenian government must be willing to engage and cooperate with neighbors like Azerbaijan, Georgia, and, yes, Türkiye.

“Protecting Armenia’s Sovereignty, Identity, and Heritage,” National Democratic Alliance, event held in  Washington, DC, 27 February 2026 (photos by the author)

The good news is that the Prime Minister is generally supportive of Washington and Europe. In fact, in 2025, the government initiated a process to apply for membership in the European Union. It is unclear how long that process would take. Moldova and Ukraine recently commenced formal accession negotiations with Brussels, but that development is a direct consequence of the Russian invasion of Ukraine; meanwhile, Türkiye has been in application purgatory for decades.

However, domestic considerations must also be taken into account. To secure his re-election, Pashnyan’s government has engaged in undemocratic practices. There have been several accusations of suppression of opposition parties and the detention of opposition leaders. For example, local media outlets reported that law-enforcement officials raided around 50 campaign offices of Samvel Karapetyan’s Strong Armenia bloc; many party members and supporters were arrested. Criminal cases were opened against other major opposition forces, including the leader of the Prosperous Armenia Party, Gagik Tsarukyan (namely, tax evasion). Other reports suggest that Pashnyan’s government created a climate of fear to discourage Armenians from going to vote.

Religious organizations also expressed their concern about the elections. Specifically, there are tensions between Pashinyan’s government and the Armenian Apostolic Church. Earlier this year, Armenian prosecutors opened a criminal case against Catholicos Garegin II, the Catholicos of All Armenians, or the supreme head of the Armenian Apostolic Church. The charge against Garegin II is obstructing the enforcement of a court ruling, and he is currently prohibited from leaving the country.

An alarm was raised in Washington prior to the elections about Pashinyan’s domestic policies. Namely, the Armenian National Democratic Alliance organized a briefing for US members of Congress this past February at the US Congress (the author of this analysis attended said event). The speakers included representatives from the Middle East Media Research Institute and Christian Solidarity International. Also speaking was Dr. Ján Figeľ, a former special envoy for the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside of the European Union. The overall message of the event was that Pashnyan was behaving in undemocratic manners.

On election day, the tactics worked. Armenia’s National Assembly (the legislative body) has 105 seats: after the recent elections, Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party has a comfortable majority of 64 seats. The two other parties are Strong Armenia (29) and Armenia Alliance (12), both of which are generally regarded as supportive of Moscow. Voting turnout was relatively low: Armenia has around three million citizens, with around 2.5 million registered voters. Of that number, around 1.4 million voted, or 58%.

The opposition Strong Armenia party, led by the Armenian-Russian billionaire Karapetyan, has asked the Constitutional Court to invalidate the elections or call for a second round of voting. It is doubtful either scenario will occur. (To be fair, Karapetyan, who is currently under house arrest, is a very controversial figure, as he has advocated for the overthrow of the Armenian government).

Generally speaking, Europe and Washington have been supportive of the results. Both US President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio (who visited Yerevan in May) issued brief statements via social media praising the result. Meanwhile, European Commission President von der Leyen will reportedly meet with Pashinyan to discuss the future of EU-Armenia strategic relations.

A brief comparison is necessary: two years ago, in neighboring Georgia, pro-Moscow parties won control of the government, leading to mass public protests; the elections drew condemnations from Washington and Europe and praise from Moscow. Geopolitical considerations and foreign policy interests are at play here. What “really” matters is which global power (or bloc) the government of a “small” state supports; that fact alone will determine whether Washington, Moscow, Brussels, London, and even regional powerhouses like Ankara or Tehran will support it.

Thus, Europe and the US will view the elections in Armenia as legitimate and democratic, as long as the Pashinyan government remains committed to distancing itself from Russia’s influence. While the electoral results in Armenia are certainly positive for the West, democratic values and supporting good governance cannot be lost in this new era of transactional diplomacy. The international community should at least directly and sternly engage Pashinyan to remind him that stealing the vote and silencing the voice of the Armenian people is unacceptable, and future crackdowns need to stop.

Due to the war in Ukraine, the recent conflicts in Iran, the competition for critical minerals, and the development of the Middle Corridor, the South Caucasus is solidifying its position as a region of strategic importance. But this importance cannot outweigh the value of respecting human rights and conducting free and fair elections. These terms cannot be mere political tools in Yerevan.

In the post-June 7 world, Armenia will continue to have a pro-Europe, Washington-friendly government, while Moscow will (ideally) accept defeat in a country it continues to consider part of its near abroad. Hence, the recent elections are an important and positive outcome for the West at the geopolitical level. Unfortunately, the Pashinyan government is increasingly behaving in an authoritarian manner. For three million Armenians, that is important too.

    Wilder Alejandro Sanchez

    Wilder Alejandro Sánchez is President of Second Floor Strategies, a consulting firm in Washington, D.C. He covers geopolitical, defense, and trade issues in the Western Hemisphere, Eastern Europe and Central Asia.

    —