Why’d Most Of The World Condemn Iran At The UN?

The lack of any meaningful economic relationship with Iran predetermined that most countries would support any resolution against it if unofficially forced to choose between the Islamic Republic and the Gulf Kingdoms to whom they’re dependent to some degree on energy imports.

The UNSC just adopted a resolution condemning Iran for its attacks against the Gulf Kingdoms, including against civilian and residential areas, after Russia and China abstained just like they abstained from last fall’s resolution on Gaza due to their Arab partners’ support for these two measures. Russia proposed a second draft that its permanent representative said was “aimed at urgently de-escalating the situation… (and is) simple, direct and unequivocal, and intentionally does not name any parties to the conflict.”

The US predictably vetoed it, hence why Russia and China then felt compelled to abstain from the initial draft, but this nevertheless showed that Russia did its best to support Iran at the UNSC. As for the resolution that ultimately passed, it was backed by a whopping 135 countries, which Al Jazeera’s corresponded described as “the largest number of countries ever to cosponsor a Security Council draft resolution.” The reasons for this historic condemnation of Iran are pretty straightforward.

Simply put, most of the world is dependent to some degree on energy imports from the Gulf Kingdoms, while Iran provides pretty much nothing to most of them since few apart from China are willing to defy the US’ secondary sanctions threats by significantly trading with it. They therefore stand to lose much more from the disruption of Gulf Kingdoms’ energy exports caused by Iran’s attacks against them than from the joint US-Israel campaign against Iran that’s devastating the Islamic Republic.

The international community’s lack of any meaningful economic relationship with Iran at the start of the Third Gulf War sharply contrasts with the relationship that they had with Russia at the start of NATO’s proxy war on it through Ukraine that entered its most intense phase four years ago. Back then and still to this day to a large extent, many of them were dependent to some degree on its agricultural, energy, and/or fertilizer exports, ergo why they all in some way defied the US’ secondary sanctions threats.

Even though most of the international community voted to condemn Russia at the UNGA, they all still retained some level of their commodity imports from it, including the EU. They and their US patron did agree to a so-called “price cap” for limiting Russia’s oil profits, but the point is that even they acknowledged that the world could not continue to function if these exports were instantly cut off. The US has since tried to wean everyone off of them, but this is no longer possible amidst the global oil crisis.

In any case, this insight enables one to retrospectively conclude that the World Majority’s defiance of the US’ secondary sanctions threats vis-à-vis maintaining trade with Russia was driven by their self-interests, not by their collective commitment to some nebulous multipolar principle. Likewise, the same goes for why most of them just condemned Iran at the UN by cosponsoring the latest Security Council Resolution, which was also in their interests to do no matter how much it disappointed some multipolar enthusiasts.

At the end of the day, the lack of any meaningful economic relationship with Iran predetermined that the majority of the world would support any resolution against it if unofficially forced to choose between the Islamic Republic and the Gulf Kingdoms to whom they’re dependent to some degree on energy imports. This is the cold reality of International Relations, which is an unpleasant reminder to the well-intentioned activists who want to change the way that the world works that this is a lot easier said than done.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/whyd-most-of-the-world-condemn-iran?fbclid=IwY2xjawQgaN5leHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFnNkhqU2RDaU44VjdEeWtjc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHm6dMxpCa4V7yVF5NWSqZrPfsYeR-ivS3v0BgvAY-8no83ACqESU3dEXmymE_aem_erDzndibU4v9F510AeIfNA&triedRedirect=true&_src_ref=l.facebook.com

Trump says U.S. has hit 28 Iranian minelaying ships

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

U.S. President Donald Trump said U.S. forces have hit 28 Iranian minelaying ships as of Wednesday.

“They started talking about mines, so we hit 28 mine ships as of this moment,” CBS News quoted Trump as saying while touring a pharmaceutical company in Cincinnati.

U.S. officials had told CBS News that Iran may have been preparing to use naval mines in the key Strait of Hormuz off the Iranian coast.

A reporter asked President Trump on the White House South Lawn Wednesday what more needs to happen militarily for the operation in Iran to end.  

“More of the same,” the president responded. “And we’ll see how that all comes out. Right now, they’ve lost their navy, they’ve lost their air force, they have no anti-aircraft apparatus at all. They have no radar. Their leaders are gone. And we could do a lot worse.” 

When he was asked about the latest reporting suggesting the U.S. may be at fault for the deadly strike at a school in Iran, the president said, “I don’t know about it.”

Iran said that 170 schoolgirls were killed in a school in Minab in a U.S. Tomahawk strike on the first day of the military operations. The U.S. said it would investigate. Initially, the U.S. president suggested to reporters that Iran might be behind it. But Reuters, CBS News and New York Times reported that a preliminary military investigation into the bombing of the elementary school found the U.S. was likely responsible. 

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Citi, StanChart evacuate Dubai offices, HSBC closes Qatar branches

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Citigroup and Standard Chartered have begun evacuating their Dubai offices, telling staff ‌to work from home instead, Reuters reported citing sources on Wednesday, as banks step up precautions after Iran threatened Gulf banking interests linked to the U.S. and Israel.

U.S. financial giant Citigroup told its staff to evacuate offices in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) and Dubai’s Oud Metha neighbourhood, a memo sent to employees which was seen by Reuters shows, telling them to work from home until further notice.

Britain’s StanChart has a large presence in the United Arab ⁠Emirates, with Dubai now a major financial hub for leading international lenders including JPMorgan and HSBC, as well as law firms and asset managers. Separately, HSBC has closed all branches in Qatar until further notice, according to a customer notice, saying the measure was to ensure the safety of staff and customers, Reuters reported.

The moves came after a spokesperson for Tehran’s Khatam al-Anbiya military command headquarters said on Wednesday that Iran will target economic and banking interests linked to the U.S. and Israel in the region, after an attack on an Iranian bank.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Verelq: What lies beneath the “pause” of the anti-church campaign?

“Fact” daily writes:


Recently, the certain passivity of the current authorities and Nikol Pashinyan in the declared war against the Armenian Apostolic Church is extremely obvious. Moreover, Pashinyan participates in liturgies where the name of Catholicos of All Armenians Garegin II is not discounted, although he declared weeks ago that it is a matter of principle for him.


According to our sources, not only pre-election “logic” played a role in this “pause” of Pashinyan, but also the survey published by IRI the other day, the results of which the Pashinyan government was familiar with earlier. In particular, according to the results of the survey conducted in February 2026, 61 percent of respondents expressed satisfaction with the Armenian Apostolic Church. Moreover, in June 2025, that figure was 58 percent. This proves that the anti-church campaign of the current authorities, the use of law enforcement “instruments” against the clergy and other pressures do not produce the desired results of Pashinyan, even on the contrary.


According to the information we have, this does not mean that Pashinyan has stopped the anti-church campaign. On the contrary, according to our sources, they have now started working “underneath”, specifically following the financial movements of the AAP, finding “dirt”, in short, collecting tangible “files” in order to attack the Church with new force when needed.

“Is there a war in Armenia that I am unaware of?” – Pashinyan

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 12 2026

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stressed that the statement by former Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan that Azerbaijani forces have established a new combat position inside Armenian territory near the village of Kut does not correspond to reality.

“There is a clear map, there is a clear border line with de jure significance, which shows that contradicts those allegations,” he said in a conversation with reporters.

Pashinyan asked a question:

“Is there a war I am unaware of?”

“Or is there some kind of conflict or escalation, with victims and wounded, and you are not telling me about it – are you sparing me? Where is the war, where are the wounded, where is the shooting, where are the victims, where is the attack or explosion? Explain it to us, let us know where all of that is happening,” he said. 

The prime minister insisted that there is peace in Armenia.

Pashinyan also addressed meetings with relatives of missing persons, noting that he has met with them dozens of times and that experience shows it is important to clearly understand the purpose and expected outcome of such meetings.

“I never avoid meetings. I go out into the streets to meet people. But the goal, effectiveness, and agenda of a meeting must be clear,” Pashinyan added. 

“A man went to the European Parliament and said that the bishops are agents o

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 12 2026

To those who still doubt that the war and the post-war disasters – the depopulation of Nagorno-Karabakh, the occupation of Armenia’s sovereign territories, and the compliant acceptance of all of Azerbaijan’s demands – could have been avoided if the person leading the state had any understanding of diplomacy, foreign policy, and the value of words, I simply recommend listening to just one part of Pashinyan’s speech,” former Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanyan wrote, commenting on Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s speech at the European Parliament.

“A man went to the podium of the European Parliament and declared that the bishops of the Armenian Apostolic Church had violated certain spiritual rules known only to him, that they are agents of influence, and that they seek to undermine his ‘peace.’

If you cannot imagine what an absurd – at best ridiculous, and at worst contemptible – impression such remarks may have made on those sitting in the hall, I would struggle to describe it in words.

And if you can imagine it, then it is not difficult to understand that since 2018, during the negotiations over Artsakh, before the war, during the war, and in the post-war period up to the present day, the country has been led by a person who has failed to grasp what should be said and what should not be said; what is expected of a statesman; what no one is interested in hearing; and what ultimately reveals weakness, ignorance, fear, and sheer incompetence.

The answer to why Armenia has found itself in its current state lies precisely in this simple reality,” he wrote.

“It’s a call to war”: Pashinyan now angered with references to Artsakh in chu

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 12 2026

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed his anger that the name Artsakh continues to be mentioned during Holy and Immortal liturgies of the Armenian Apostolic Church.

“What does that mean? It means a call to war – nothing else,” he said, speaking with reporters.

According to Pashinyan who declared war against the Church, the Catholicos and other members of the clergy have “taken the leadership of the war party.”

“There should not be such a situation. How can there be six different foreign policies in one country?” Pashinyan emphasized.

“I have no doubt that the peace agreement will be signed – when exactly is a

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 12 2026

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that he and the President of Azerbaijan are now speaking not about relative stability but about peace.

He noted that quiet, calm, and consistent diplomatic work is underway toward signing a peace agreement.

“I have no doubt that the agreement will be signed. It may be signed in April, May, June, or September – when exactly is a secondary issue, but it will be signed,” he said.

According to Pashinyan, although the agreement has not yet been finalized, peace has already been established.

He added that there are forces in Armenia – and presumably also in Azerbaijan – that are not satisfied with the establishment of peace and may attempt to reverse it.

“We must stand up for the established peace and make it irreversible,” Pashinyan added.

“Yes, there should be no reference to the Declaration of Independence in the

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 12 2026

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated during a briefing with journalists that the new Constitution should not include any reference to the Declaration of Independence, while adding that he sees no need to alter the text of the Declaration itself.

“The Declaration of Independence is built on the logic of conflict. We cannot continue with a logic of conflict if we want to build an independent state,” he said, noting that he had already expressed his position in detail in his message on the day of the Declaration of Independence.

Pashinyan says he asked genocide museum director to resign over gift of book a

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 12 2026

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said on Thursday he had asked the director of Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, Edita Gzoyan, to submit her resignation after she presented a book about Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) to U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance during a tour at the Armenian Genocide Memorial. 
 
Speaking at a press briefing in Yerevan, Pashinyan confirmed reports that Gzoyan’s departure was linked to the incident and said the move was necessary because foreign policy is determined solely by the Armenian government. 
 
“When the country’s prime minister says there is no ‘Karabakh movement,’ what does it mean to present a foreign guest with a book about the Artsakh issue?” Pashinyan said. 
“In Armenia, foreign policy is conducted by the government,” he added. “Any state official who says or does something that contradicts the government’s foreign policy must leave their position.” 
 
Responding to a question from reporters about whether Gzoyan’s removal was directly connected to the book given to the U.S. vice president, Pashinyan said: “Yes, I asked her to write a resignation letter. I regarded this as an action contradicting the government’s foreign policy and considered it a provocative act.” 
 
The Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, located at the Tsitsernakaberd Memorial Complex in Yerevan, is Armenia’s leading state research institution dedicated to the study and commemoration of the Armenian Genocide. 
 
Nagorno Karabakh, or Artsakh, historically populated by ethnic Armenians, has been the center of decades of conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Following a 44-day war in Fall 2020 and occupation of swaths of territory in Nagorno Karabakh, Azerbaijan continued military provocations along the new Line of Contact, and following a 9-month siege of the region (despite presence of Russian peacekeepers), launched a two-day war in September 2023 and took full control of the region, prompting more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians to forcefully flee to Armenia. 
 
Pashinyan’s government has since signaled a shift in policy toward recognizing what he labeled as ‘Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity’ as part of efforts to negotiate a peace agreement between the two countries.