Aliyev says he achieved peace with Armenia by force

Jane Topchian
OC Media
March 12 2026
by Yousef Bardouka

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has  praised the ongoing peace process with Armenia, saying that ‘there is nothing better than peace’. However, moments before, he said that Azerbaijan had ‘achieved peace with Armenia first by force, and then by political means’.

The remarks came during his speech at the opening of the Global Baku Forum.

In the speech, as published by pro-government media outlet APA, Aliyev criticised UN Security Council resolutions demanding the withdrawal of Armenian troops from Azerbaijani territories, saying they had ‘remained on paper for almost 30 years’.

He then spoke about the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War in 2020, saying it is ‘sometimes necessary to use force to achieve peace’ if there was ‘no hope for a peaceful solution’.

‘And that is exactly what happened. We achieved peace with Armenia first by force, and then by political means’, Aliyev said.

Aliyev then praised the ‘unprecedented speed’ at which the peace process between Armenia and Azerbaijan was moving, attributing it to ‘strong political will and the understanding that eternal hostility is impossible and war must definitely end’.

‘We have been living in peace for seven months and we see its advantages. I have said many times and I will get tired of saying that there is nothing better than peace’, Aliyev said.

Separately, Aliyev said that the emergence of ‘new hotbeds of tensions and ongoing long-term conflict’ worldwide posed a threat to international relations and law.

He argued that the ‘experience of a country that was invaded, experienced ethnic cleansing and genocide, but later restored its sovereignty, territorial integrity and dignity through force, and then offered peace to a defeated enemy, is, in my opinion, an important experience that can be shared with the international community’.

He criticised the OSCE Minsk Group, the platform created to mediate the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, calling it a ‘failure’, and saying that its goal ‘was not to resolve the conflict, but to freeze it and use it as a lever of influence on both countries’.

The dissolution of the Minsk Group was one of Azerbaijan’s primary preconditions for a peace agreement with Armenia. It was dissolved in September 2025.

Aliyev also spoke about trade with Armenia, saying that his country had removed all restrictions on the transport of goods — including petrol.

He said that Azerbaijan and Armenia were cooperating to ‘create a new branch of the Middle Corridor’, which will allow Armenia to ‘become a transit country for the first time in its history of independence’.

—

Explainer | How Pashinyan is working to topple Catholicos Karekin II

Manouk Vasilian
OC Media
March 12 2026

As parliamentary elections grow nearer, tensions between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and the Armenian Apostolic Church continue to build.

by Arshaluys Barseghyan

Although Armenia is constitutionally secular, Christianity forms a core part of the national identity, with Armenians taking pride in being widely regarded as the first country to adopt Christianity as a state religion in 301. The current head of the Armenian Apostolic Church, Catholicos Karekin II, maintained close ties with Armenia’s previous leaders, creating favourable conditions for cooperation. Under Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, however, relations have shifted, with developments surrounding Church-state relations coming to dominate public and political discourse.

The topic again rose to prominence in May 2025, when a new round of tension between the Church and state escalated after Pashinyan criticised Church leadership for failing to properly maintain churches across the country, comparing them to ‘storage rooms’ filled with construction materials and other non-religious items

As accusations against the Church, and specifically against Karekin II, continued to grow, Pashinyan gradually made clear that he was seeking to oust the Catholicos.

In January, this goal was formally articulated in a Church reform agenda signed by Pashinyan and 10 senior clergy members at Pashinyan’s official residence. The statement announced the creation of a Coordinating Council to be composed of the signatories and tasked with overseeing the organisational aspects of the reform process. Notably, Pashinyan signed the document in his capacity as Armenia’s prime minister — rather than as a follower of the Armenian Apostolic Church, as he had previously framed his involvement in Church issues — raising widespread concern that the move may have violated the constitution.

As Armenia heads toward its 2026 parliamentary elections, Pashinyan’s government has intensified its criticism of the Church, including warning of ‘hybrid threats’ facing the country, widely interpreted as referring to Russia, and hinting at Karekin II’s alleged foreign ties. It remains to be seen if Pashinyan will succeed in ousting Karekin II, however.

Why does Pashinyan want Karekin II out?

Pashinyan has put forward several justifications for seeking to replace Karekin II as Catholicos of the Armenian Apostolic Church, but two stand out.

First, he claims Karekin II violated his vow of celibacy and fathered a daughter, which would make him ineligible for the post.

Second — and more seriously — Pashinyan alleges that Karekin II has ties to ‘foreign intelligence services’, apparently Russian, which pose a threat to Armenia’s security. The accusations have raised questions about why no action was taken earlier, if Pashinyan’s government was aware of the information after coming to power in 2018.

Rejecting claims that he is seeking a more loyal Church leader, Pashinyan has claimed that he wants one free of foreign ties.

Still, as the standoff deepens, increasingly serious accusations against Karekin II and other senior clergy are always on offer — including allegations of paedophilia, employing ‘sectarian logic’, preaching ‘radical texts’, and ensuring ‘shadow money’ enters Armenia ‘to be used for political purposes’ — alongside the continued arrests of clergy on criminal grounds.

In February, Pashinyan offered further insights into his confrontation in an interview with Public TV, accusing the Church of acting as ‘a foreign state within the state’ and insisting that ‘the church should not engage in politics’.

Citing prior calls by Karekin II for Pashinyan’s resignation, as well as Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan’s 2024 anti-government protests, Pashinyan claimed such actions could not ‘remain without consequences, because we are talking about the sovereignty and security of our state’.

What pressure is Pashinyan employing against the Church?

Since the renewed confrontation, the government has taken a series of steps critics describe as repressive, targeting both the Church and Karekin II, interfering in the Church’s internal affairs, and using law enforcement as instruments of political pressure.

To start, four high-ranking priests have been placed in pre-trial detention on various charges, with two later remanded to house arrest and one under administrative supervision. The cases have sparked concern, particularly as some charges relate to incidents or statements from years ago, which authorities had previously declined to open investigations into, citing a lack of grounds.

Beyond the four detained clergy — including Karekin II’s nephew, Bishop Mkrtich Proshyan — other clerics, including Karekin II himself, have faced charges, with measures ranging from pre-trial detention to travel bans. Earlier in February, such restrictions prevented Karekin II from attending a bishops’ synod in Austria, in line with Pashinyan’s statement.

Karekin II’s brother says no judge would sentence catholicos, threatens excommunication

The cases have also affected other members of Karekin II’s family. His brother Gevorg Nersisyan and Nersisyan’s son Hambardzum were arrested during a local election campaign in Vagharshapat in November 2025. Following Pashinyan’s allegations, the Armenian Security Service (NSS) declassified documents claiming another brother, Archbishop Yezras, head of the Diocese of New Nakhchivan and Russia, had been recruited by the Soviet-era KGB.

Attempts to publicly discredit senior clergy have also intensified. Intimate footage allegedly depicting Archbishop Arshak Khachatryan was leaked, and the Pashinyan-affiliated website Civic.am has published a photo of Bishop Kirakos Davtyan in an alleged intoxicated, partially undressed state, suggesting he was an alcoholic.

Separately, authorities dissolved the Spiritual-Cultural Public TV company, which broadcasts the Church-founded Shoghakat TV. Reports also indicate that military commanders have pressured army chaplains to back Pashinyan’s reform agenda, while defrocked clergy were allowed to conduct liturgies under police supervision, with Pashinyan and officials in attendance. NSS officials were involved in omitting Karekin II’s name from services, a move that disrupted the established order of the religious ceremony and was a sign of protest against the Catholicos by his subordinates.

How is Karekin II fighting back?

Since tensions with the authorities increased in May 2025, Karekin II has defrocked or removed several opponents within the Church as a main tactic to fight back.

Among the first to be defrocked, in October 2025, was priest Aram Asatryan, an early vocal supporter of Pashinyan within the clergy. Neither Asatryan nor Pashinyan accepted Karekin II’s decision to strip him of his status; Pashinyan even attended a liturgy led by Asatryan following the decision. The Mother See called this liturgy ‘a soul-destroying initiative’ and accused Pashinyan of attempting to ‘split the Church’.

Asatryan remained at his assigned church, often seen under police protection. In January, the Church filed two lawsuits demanding the return of the church keys and a Yerevan apartment allocated to Asatryan by the Mother See.

The highest-ranking clergyman affected was Bishop Gevorg Saroyan, who was defrocked in January after suing to challenge his dismissal as Primate of the Masyatsotn Diocese.

Responding to criticism over the defrocking practices, the Mother See reported that during Karekin II’s 26-year tenure, 101 clergymen had been dismissed, including 21 directly by the Catholicos himself. At the same time, 491 clergymen were ordained.

Neither Armenian authorities, nor the defrocked clergy members have accepted Karekin II’s decisions, pointing towards his alleged illegitimacy as head of the Church.

Separately, Karekin II and the official Mother See have so far responded modestly to the accusations, avoiding offensive language, unlike their opponents, who have publicly used priests’ civilian names as well as obscene speech. That being said, some clergy have offered insults, calling Pashinyan ‘the chief madman of the country’ or ‘Judas’.

In official statements, Karekin II and the Mother See have described the authorities’ actions as ‘oppression’, ‘interference in internal affairs’, and an ‘anti-Church campaign’ that ‘poses a grave threat to our national unity, undermines [Armenia]’s internal stability, and strikes directly at Armenian statehood’.

The Church has also said Pashinyan’s initiative ‘directly violates’ the Armenian constitution and infringes on the rights of the Church, guaranteed both internationally and under Armenian law, and described the prosecutions of clergy as unjust.

Who’s winning the clergy’s loyalty?

Despite some clergy siding with Pashinyan, the majority have remained loyal to Karekin II or stayed silent.

Following the publication of the Church reform statement, the ruling Civil Contract party reported that another 20 or so clergy members had joined the initiative.

However, some of the 10 senior clergy members who signed the statement have been linked to past corruption cases and charges under Pashinyan’s government. In addition, one of them, Archbishop Hovnan Derderian, has since appeared to turn on Pashinyan by signing a statement urging Armenian authorities to ‘stop the persecution of the Church’. In February, he and 24 other high-ranking priests ‘reaffirm[ed] his loyalty to the Mother See and the Catholicos’.

At the same time, the latest survey by the International Republican Institute (IRI) found that the Church was the second institution Armenians were most satisfied with after the Armed Forces, with 39% very satisfied with both. However, satisfaction with the Church leadership was lower, with only 23% saying they were very satisfied.

Armenians 23% less concerned about national security compared to 2025, survey finds

Can Pashinyan succeed?

Despite the release of a reform agenda with an explicit goal of ousting Karekin II, the roadmap offers no clear explanation of how such a goal could be achieved. The Armenian Apostolic Church does not grant external actors any role in the election or removal of the Catholicos, leaving significant legal and procedural gaps in the proposal.

The Catholicos, as the Church clarifies, ‘is elected for life in the National-Church Assembly, ordained and consecrated by 12 bishops in the Mother See Cathedral’.

Additionally, Armenia is a secular state, and its constitution draws clear boundaries between the state and religious institutions. In particular, Article 17 states that ‘the freedom of activities of religious organisations shall be guaranteed’ in the country.

The constitution further limits the actions of state officials, stating that they ‘shall be entitled to perform only such actions for which they are authorised under the constitution or laws’.

Citing these articles, Pashinyan’s critics argue that these provisions prohibit direct government intervention in Church affairs, and that any such attempt by the executive to influence the removal of the Catholicos would exceed constitutional authority and violate the constitution.

Even so, Pashinyan vowed in January that he intended to make Karekin II reconsider and resign.

‘[Former Prime Minister] Serzh Sargsyan also had no intention of leaving, but he was forced to leave; the same will happen to Ktrich Nersisyan [Karekin II] — he will be forced to leave as well’.

—

Pashinyan confirms firing genocide memorial head for giving Vance book on Nago

Hagop Kamalian
OC Media
March 12 2026

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has confirmed he ‘instructed’ the director of the Armenian Genocide Memorial to resign after she had given US Vice President JD Vance a book on the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict.

In a press briefing on Thursday, Pashinyan accused Edita Gzoyan, the director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute Foundation, of going against his government’s foreign policy by giving Vance the book.

He reiterated that he believed that the Armenian government ‘should not continue’ the Karabakh Movement — a mass national movement which began in the 1980s to call on the Soviet authorities to transfer the majority-Armenian Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast from Soviet Azerbaijan to Soviet Armenia.

Pashinyan castigates Karabakh movement and political opponents in emotional parliamentary outburst

‘Giving a foreign guest a book about the Artsakh [Nagorno-Karabakh] issue, what does that mean?’ Pashinyan asked, further calling the action ‘provocative’ and ‘contradicting’ his government’s foreign policy.

‘In this country, how many people are capable of conducting foreign policy? […] Any state official in Armenia who makes a statement that contradicts the foreign policy pursued by the government should be dismissed from their position. What is there to discuss?’ Pashinyan continued.

He further stated that Armenia is a state, not ‘some kind of amateur club’.

Reports suggesting that Gzoyan was pressured to resign surfaced since early March, with the tabloid Hraparak reporting that the Education Ministry justified the move by claiming that Gzoyan ‘had not properly supervised’ ongoing renovations at the Armenian Genocide Memorial Complex.

The outlet at the same time underscored that the supervision of the restoration ‘does not fall within [Gzoyan’s] official responsibilities’.

Instead, media reports suggested that Gzoyan was dismissed after speaking with Vance about the massacres of Armenians in Azerbaijan at the at the onset of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in the 1980 in February during his visit to Yerevan and the Armenian Genocide Memorial Complex. She gave Vance the book during his visit to the memorial.

The Armenian Genocide Memorial complex also houses several monuments commemorating the victims of the massacres, which Gzoyan says she had shown Vance to emphasise ‘the connection between what happened and the Armenian Genocide’.

The Armenian authorities remain cautious in their official rhetoric about the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as they navigate the ongoing normalisation process with Azerbaijan.

Pashinyan appeared to hint at his displeasure with Gzoyan’s action during an earlier parliamentary session, saying that ‘things have happened that would have been better if they hadn’t happened’.

—

Pashinyan says Brussels–Tbilisi rift is ‘biggest problem’ for Armenia’s EU bi

Edgar Tavakalian
OC Media
March 12 2026

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said the ‘biggest problem’ on Armenia’s path towards EU integration is the ‘frozen state of political dialogue between the EU and Georgia’.

Pashinyan had made the remarks during a speech at the EU Parliament.

Referencing the law adopted by the Armenian Parliament in March 2025 on launching the process of Armenia’s accession to the EU, Pashinyan said that this development came after Georgia received its own candidate status in December 2023.

‘This made Armenia’s EU membership prospect tangible, and it is our expectation and request that the EU–Georgia constructive process should develop. This is important for Armenia, just as important as for Georgia’.

Pashinyan’s comments on Wednesday sparked controversy, with some suggesting that he made the remarks at the request of the ruling Georgian Dream party in Tbilisi, particularly as he had visited the Georgian capital earlier in March and met with the Georgian leadership prior to his visit to Strasbourg.

Georgia’s authorities rushed to accuse the EU of halting the EU accession process following remarks by Pashinyan, despite having announced in December 2024 that they themselves were ‘temporarily suspending’ Georgia’s EU integration efforts.

‘Armenia’s prime minister delicately hinted to Eurobureaucracy that the unfair attitude and various types of attacks directed at Georgia should be reconsidered’, Tornike Cheishvili, the Deputy Chair of the Georgian Parliament’s Legal Affairs Committee, told the Georgian pro-government media outlet Imedi.

He further accused the EU of ‘unilaterally’ suspending political dialogue with Georgia in  2024.

Pashinyan breaks bread — and beats — in Georgia visit

On Thursday, during a press briefing, Pashinyan rejected speculations that Georgian authorities had requested that he raise the issue in the West.

‘There was no request or appeal from the Georgian side, but on the other hand, we have shared agendas, and we are working around those agendas. I voiced my concern from the podium of the European Parliament because we are genuinely concerned about the situation that exists in relations between the EU and Georgia, and it worries us’, Pashinyan said.

Prayer for ‘wisdom’ in Iran war

Pashinyan also touched on the war in Iran and the consequent developments in the Middle East, highlighting Armenia’s good relations with almost all sides involved in the conflict.

Pashinyan called Iran Armenia’s ‘good friend, our thousand-year-old neighbour’, citing the developing relations with the US, and referred to the UAE, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, Jordan, Lebanon, Bahrain, and Syria as Armenia’s ‘good partners’.

Pashinyan noted that his government was  ‘pained’ by the ongoing war; however, he added that Armenia could have no significant impact in the conflict.

‘Against the backdrop of such an international crisis of such magnitude, we are a small, modest state, and we can only pray for the repose of the souls of all the victims and for the wisdom of our partner leaders to find diplomatic solutions as soon as possible’.

Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia tread carefully as Iran conflict explodes

Route to connect Nakhchivan to Azerbaijan ahead of TRIPP

During his speech, Pashinyan praised the achievements of the peace process with Azerbaijan, the turning point of which was the August 2025 Washington Summit, which saw the initialling of a peace treaty as well as an agreement to establish the Trump Route (TRIPP), intended to connect Azerbaijan to its exclave Nakhchivan through Armenia.

Pashinyan noted that for eight months ‘complete peace has been established on the Armenia–Azerbaijan border’, and said that since the summit, cargo trains had arrived in Armenia through Azerbaijan.

Pashinyan added that Armenia had in turn announced its readiness ‘to ensure transit’ from Azerbaijan to Turkey and vice versa, though neither Ankara nor Baku have accepted his country’s offer.

‘I assume that this is because they think that such a solution might delay the implementation of the Trump Route project’, Pashinyan said, rejecting such concerns by saying Armenia had ‘no reason’ to delay its implementation.

He also presented a new proposal to provide a road connecting Azerbaijan to Nakhchivan using Armenia’s existing infrastructure.

‘This proposal of ours is not intended to delay, disrupt, or forget the Washington agreements in any way, and I say this officially. We are making these proposals because we ourselves, as I mentioned above, are using the Azerbaijani railway in a slightly alternative way’, Pashinyan said.

Azerbaijan uses Iranian territory to reach Nakhchivan. However, a recent drone strike on Nakhchivan, which Azerbaijan claims came from Iran, led to the temporary closure of transport links between the two countries, with speculation emerging in Armenia that it could serve as an alternative route.

Church leads ‘war party’ in Armenia

From the podium, Pashinyan also addressed the ongoing confrontation between his government and the Armenian Apostolic Church, which has escalated since May 2025, accusing the Church of leading a ‘war party’ in Armenia.

‘The reality is that some clergymen, who cynically violated all the rules of spiritual good conduct, thus making themselves vulnerable to foreign special services […] have assumed the leadership of the war party in Armenia, consolidating around them the former leaders of Armenia, some forces associated with them, some pro-Russian and pro-Belarusian oligarchs, and are trying to sacrifice Armenia’s independence to the interests of third countries’, Pashinyan claimed.

He further vowed not to allow ‘a new conflict’ in Armenia and said that in the parliamentary election on 7 June, ‘our democracy must make peace irreversible, and then, with peace, democracy will become irreversible’.

—

‘Main obstacle to Armenia’s EU integration is frozen EU-Georgia dialogue’ – P

Karakhanian Suren
JAM News
March 12 2026
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

“The biggest problem on the path of Armenia’s integration into the EU at the moment is the frozen state of the political dialogue between the European Union and Georgia”, — Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said this while speaking at the European Parliament.

He recalled the law adopted by Armenia’s parliament to launch the process of the country’s accession to the European Union. He stressed that lawmakers passed the law after Georgia received EU candidate status:

“This made Armenia’s EU membership prospect tangible, and it is our expectation and request that the European Union-Georgia constructive process should develop. This is important for Armenia, just as important as for Georgia”.

The Armenian prime minister also addressed the possibility of Armenia joining the European Union. He said the country now faces the task of continuing reforms in order to meet membership criteria. After that, he said, the EU will decide whether to admit Armenia.

He acknowledged that EU enlargement requires a political decision. He added that Armenia would still benefit even if it did not become a member. As he explained, it would “become a country that fully meets EU standards”.

In his speech, the Armenian prime minister spoke not only about the prospect of EU membership but also about the peace process with Azerbaijan, the upcoming parliamentary elections and the domestic political situation. Members of the European Parliament gave him a standing ovation.

  • ‘Let them bang their heads against the wall’: Armenia’s government reacts to proposal to join Russia’s Union State
  • Events around Iran pose no threat to ‘Trump route’, Armenian parliament speaker says
  • Opinion: Armenia would benefit from returning its railways to state control

‘It pains us to see what is happening in the Middle East’

In his speech at the plenary session of the European Parliament, the Armenian prime minister addressed the situation in the Middle East.

He highlighted the current scale of Armenia’s partnership with the United States. At the same time, he said Iran is “a friend and a centuries-old neighbour”. He added that Armenia recently established diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia. He also said that the UAE, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, Jordan, Lebanon, Bahrain and Syria remain long-standing partners of Armenia.

“We are pained by what is happening in the Middle East. Against the backdrop of such an international crisis of such magnitude, we are a small, modest state, and we can only pray for the repose of the souls of all the victims and for the wisdom of our partner leaders to find diplomatic solutions as soon as possible.“

‘Where has perfect peace ever been established? Where and when did it exist?’

Pashinyan said the situation on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border has remained calm for eight months. No casualties or injuries have been reported. He repeated his view that peace requires constant care.

“Otherwise it will collapse very quickly. Just as regions that remained stable for decades can fall into the whirlpool of war within a matter of days before our eyes.”

He said critics accuse the Armenian authorities of accepting a peace with Azerbaijan that is not perfect. In response, the prime minister addressed European lawmakers with a question:

“Please tell me, where has perfect peace been established, where and when did it exist? On the contrary, the willingness to care for peace makes it possible to improve it.”

‘Ready to provide Azerbaijan with road transit’

Speaking about the benefits of peace, Pashinyan recalled that Azerbaijan lifted restrictions on railway transport through its territory. In November 2025, cargo reached Armenia along this route for the first time since the conflict began.

“We plan to use the Georgia-Azerbaijan railway for exports as well. I hope Azerbaijan will also become an export destination for Armenia in the near future,” he said.

The Armenian prime minister repeated his proposal to allow transit from Azerbaijan to Turkey and back immediately. Baku and Ankara have not used this opportunity so far. Pashinyan said they may believe it could delay the implementation of the “Trump Route” project.

“Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity” (TRIPP) is a road project that would connect Azerbaijan with its exclave of Nakhchivan through the territory of Armenia.

“Armenia has neither the intention nor any grounds to delay the implementation of the TRIPP project. The project fully serves Armenia’s short-, medium- and long-term interests and in no way undermines Armenia’s sovereignty, territorial integrity or jurisdiction,” he said.

From the European Parliament podium, Armenia’s prime minister called on Azerbaijan to provide road transit.

“Now I also want to say that the Republic of Armenia is ready to provide a road connection between the western regions of Azerbaijan and the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic via the Kornidzor-Goris-Yeghegnadzor-Yeraskh route using the existing infrastructure.“

Returning to the issue of railway links, Nikol Pashinyan said:

“Just as Azerbaijan is waiting for the establishment of a connection through the territory of Armenia to Nakhchivan, so we are waiting for the establishment of a railway connection between the south and north of Armenia through the territory of Nakhchivan. This railway route has no alternative for Armenia, the mountainous terrain of Armenia does not allow for a railway connection between the south and north of the country in any other way. As you can see, the expectations of Armenia and Azerbaijan do not contradict each other.“

“Democracy must make peace irreversible”

Pashinyan said Armenia achieved peace thanks to its commitment to democratic values. He said he hopes the parliamentary elections scheduled for 7 June will make both democracy and peace irreversible.

“The next parliamentary elections will be held in the Republic of Armenia, and with these elections, our democracy must make peace irreversible, and then, with peace, democracy will become irreversible. We are going this way, and I say this as a legitimate representative of the people of the Republic of Armenia.“

‘Some clergy have taken leadership of the party of war’

The prime minister said Armenia stood on the brink of losing its statehood before the start of the border demarcation process with Azerbaijan on the Tavush–Gazakh section in spring 2024.

“If in April 2024 we had failed to make a decision to launch the process of demarcation with Azerbaijan, the Republic of Armenia would be a territory under foreign rcontrol at best today.”

He said an archbishop supported by the Catholicos of All Armenians launched a protest movement at that time. Pashinyan referred to Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, who led the opposition movement “Sacred Struggle”. According to the prime minister, the movement demanded the rejection of delimitation and sought to escalate the conflict.

Pashinyan said some senior clergy and opposition forces that support them carried out a “disinformation campaign”. He said they tried to convince people that the government planned to hand over sovereign Armenian territory and ancient churches located there to Azerbaijan.

“And how did we solve the problem? We talked to our employer, the people. And now, the village of Kirants in Tavush region, which the leaders of the church-opposition movement had made their symbol, convincing people that the village would be emptied and abandoned, has had about a 50 percent increase in houses with the support of the Government after the demarcation and today is an absolutely peaceful, safe and colorful settlement. And the ancient churches are being restored or renovated.” he said.

Pashinyan said clergy involved in what he described as a “process against peace”, together with their supporters, try to spread several claims in the European Parliament and other international organisations.

He said they claim that:

  • the Armenian government restricts freedom of conscience,
  • the country lives under a dictatorship,
  • and political prisoners exist.

“These clergy have taken leadership of the party of war. They have gathered around themselves former Armenian presidents, their allied forces, and several Russian and pro-Belarusian oligarchs. They are trying to sacrifice Armenia’s independence to serve the interests of third countries,” the prime minister said.

Speaking about the Russian oligarch, the prime minister refers to dollar billionaire Samvel Karapetyan, who remains under house arrest for calls to seize power. By the pro-Belarusian oligarch, he refers to one of Armenia’s richest businessmen, Gagik Tsarukyan. Both have announced that the political parties they lead will take part in the parliamentary elections scheduled for June.

Pashinyan said these clergy had “cynically violated all rules of spiritual morality and made themselves vulnerable to foreign intelligence services”. He also claimed that some of them had worked as agents of the Soviet KGB and that documents prove this. In this case, he referred to a document published by Armenia’s National Security Service stating that the brother of the Catholicos, Archbishop Yezras Nersisyan, had been recruited by the KGB.

‘We will not allow a new conflict, a new war, we will not allow the consciousness, peace and independence gained at the cost of thousands of victims to be sacrificed for anti-Christian purposes. In the text of our liturgy of the Armenian Apostolic Holy Church, the word peace is mentioned more than 40 times, and it is not only about the person, the soul, but also about world peace, about which there are dozens of supplications in the canonical text of our liturgy, to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, and today some are using the altar of Christ to preach conflict, war and/or intra-Armenian violence, trespassing the boundaries of the legislation of the Republic of Armenia‘, — prime-minister said.

‘Diplomatic efforts continue to secure the return of compatriots held in Azerbaijani prisons’

Speaking about Armenian prisoners held in Baku, Pashinyan said the Armenian authorities continue diplomatic efforts for their release “quietly”.

“Recently, Azerbaijan released four more of our compatriots. The Armenian society, we all experienced happiness on that occasion. But the Government very quickly returned to continuing its silent diplomatic work, for the sake of the return of others”

He said that if the authorities had not pursued this diplomatic approach — without publicising negotiations — the four Armenian prisoners would not have returned home.

“One of our important tasks is also to ensure that the emotions of our Karabakh sisters and brothers who have become refugees are not exploited, giving them false hopes.”

According to Nikol Pashinyan, the government follows the following strategy:

“Our strategy in this regard is very clear: our Karabakh sisters and brothers must receive Armenian citizenship and be permanently settled in the Republic of Armenia. We have already launched their resettlement program, which has benefited 4,886 families so far. We need the greatest possible support from our international partners to solve this problem aimed at strengthening peace.”

The prime minister said it is also important that no one plays with the emotions of these “people who became refugees by giving them false hope”. Pashinyan appeared to refer to narratives about their return to their homeland, which the opposition has voiced recently.


—

Opinion: Pashinyan is right — Armenia’s path to the European Union will becom

Emil Lazarian
JAM News
March 12 2026
  • Tbilisi

Giorgi Rukhadze, founder of the Centre for Strategic Analysis, commented on a statement by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who said that one of the biggest obstacles to Armenia’s integration into the European Union is the freeze in political dialogue between the EU and Georgia.

Rukhadze said Pashinyan’s remarks reflect Armenia’s national interests and the current reality.

“Frankly speaking, the biggest problem for Armenia’s European integration at the moment is the frozen political dialogue between the European Union and Georgia. For us, Georgia is the path to the European Union. We adopted a law to begin the EU accession process after Georgia received EU candidate status. That made the prospect of Armenia’s EU membership tangible, and we expect and demand the development of a constructive process between the European Union and Georgia. This is important for Armenia. It is just as important as it is for Georgia itself,” Nikol Pashinyan said during his speech in the European Parliament.

Giorgi Rukhadze said: “Pashinyan’s statement reflects Armenia’s national interests. What Pashinyan says is true. Armenia’s path towards the European Union will become significantly more complicated if Georgia remains in the condition it is in today. Prime Minister Pashinyan did not explain why the process [of Georgia’s integration] has stalled, but in reality we all know why.

Everything would be different if Georgia were not ruled by a Russian oligarch. Bidzina Ivanishvili — the ‘Georgian ayatollah’ — is effectively governing the country today.

Because of this, negotiations with the European Union have been suspended; the visa-free regime is under threat, and, incidentally, the association agreement is also at risk.”

“This situation cannot be fixed through dialogue. There is only one reason why Georgia as a state has ended up in this position: the Russian and illegitimate rule of Ivanishvili.

The need for negotiations will arise only when the moment comes and the Ivanishvili regime sees that it is losing power. Only then will it agree to talks. Have you seen the Georgian Dream retreat on anything over the past two years?

Today there is nothing to talk about. Who would we talk to — the Russians? What is there to discuss with Russian occupiers — whether they will grant you some place in politics? Unfortunately, there is nothing to discuss.

The only way out is unity — expanding that unity. Through a broader unity it will be possible to create even greater pressure on Georgian Dream. External factors will also play a role, and they are no longer working in Georgian Dream’s favour.”

https://jam-news.net/on-georgias-accession-to-the-european-union/

—

‘Russia trying to send tens of thousands of voters to Armenia’s elections’: de

Emma Jilavian
JAM News
March 12 2026
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

In Armenia, officials and analysts discuss a statement from the Foreign Intelligence Service about attempts by the intelligence services of another country to influence the parliamentary elections scheduled for June. According to the SVR statement, those services pressure people of Armenian origin and Armenian citizens who live in that country. They allegedly urge them to travel to Armenia and vote “in the required way.” Organisers promise payment and compensation for travel expenses.

The Foreign Intelligence Service did not name the country involved. During a weekly briefing, journalists asked Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan why the authorities had not disclosed where Armenian citizens face pressure.

“This is a question of the scope and expediency of information. I think more detailed explanations will be provided later — if necessary,” he replied.

Pashinyan said these actions require a legal assessment. At the same time, he expressed confidence that the plan would not work as its organisers expect.

“I have already said that I have no doubt that if such a situation arises [he meant the participation of Armenians living outside the country in the elections], in theory the majority of our compatriots, our citizens living in Russia, will vote for us [his party],” the prime minister said, indicating that the SVR statement referred to Russia.

Representatives of civil society also believe that pressure on Armenian voters comes from Moscow.

Daniel Ioannisyan, a member of the Independent Observer bloc, told Radio Azatutyun (Radio Liberty) that the group knew about the process organised in Russia even before the SVR announcement. After receiving the information, the bloc began collecting evidence. It spoke publicly about the issue only after the topic entered public debate.

According to Ioannisyan, organisers plan to bring about 80,000 voters from Russia to Armenia. Each voter was promised what he described as “an electoral bribe of 100,000 roubles.”

The SVR and law enforcement agencies have not said which political force the organisers want these voters to support. However, representatives of Armenia’s ruling party point to the Strong Armenia party. Russian citizen and dollar billionaire Samvel Karapetyan leads that party. Authorities currently hold the businessman under house arrest in Armenia after he called for the seizure of power. He has announced his candidacy for prime minister, although the constitution does not allow him to hold the post because he holds citizenship of Armenia, Russia and Cyprus.

Here is what is known so far, along with a political analyst’s comment.

  • ‘Goal is to turn Armenia into a Russian outpost’: Samvel Karapetyan named as prime ministerial candidate
  • Awaiting end of war in Ukraine: Russia’s intentions in South Caucasus
  • Opinion: ‘Everything must be done to ensure Russian Railways leaves Armenia’

Statement by the Foreign Intelligence Service

“The Foreign Intelligence Service has received intelligence indicating that in several countries various actors, acting on behalf of the host country’s intelligence services, are trying to pressure people of Armenian origin and citizens of the Republic of Armenia who conduct economic activity in those countries.

Through such pressure, they push them to take actions in support of certain political forces that have applied to participate in the upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia. These actions may include, but are not limited to, financial and organisational support provided by the above-mentioned businessmen to those political forces,” the intelligence service said on 10 March.

“Possible criminal activity will be neutralised”: response from law enforcement

“Any unlawful influence or interference in the electoral process requires a legal assessment. We urge you to remain vigilant. If you have information about such cases, contact the police immediately,” the Interior Ministry said shortly after the Foreign Intelligence Service released its statement.

Police officers carried out “control measures” and then passed information about the alleged crime to the Investigative Committee. The case concerns obstruction of the free exercise of voting rights. It also involves coercion to participate in elections through material or other forms of dependence.

The Investigative Committee said it already has information about “obstruction of individuals’ free exercise of electoral rights by offering material incentives.” Leaders and responsible figures from several Armenian parties carried out these actions.

The Investigative Committee also said:

“Acting on behalf of the intelligence services of another country, various actors — including major businessmen from that country, leaders of Armenian communities and criminal authorities — are putting pressure on people of Armenian origin and citizens of the Republic of Armenia who conduct economic activity in another country. They urge them to take actions in support of parties that have applied to participate in the upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia.”

In return, the message says, organisers promise to “arrange travel from another country to Armenia, reimburse transport costs and cover accommodation expenses in Armenia.”

Authorities have opened a criminal case. The Investigative Committee says it will take all necessary measures to “neutralise possible criminal activity.”

‘Russia’s FSB is putting pressure on Armenian businessmen‘

Daniel Ioannisyan, a member of the Independent Observer bloc, said the NGO had submitted a report to Armenia’s Prosecutor General about actions by Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB).

He claims that the FSB is pressuring Armenian businessmen. They are being forced to finance “the mobilisation and transport to Armenia of voters who live in Russia but hold Armenian citizenship.”

According to Ioannisyan, the aim is to change the government in Armenia after the elections scheduled for 7 June:

“According to the information we have, they are working to ensure that a particular political force wins the election. We will definitely publish evidence as soon as we obtain it.”

He said organisers plan to bring about 80,000 people from Russia alone.

They will not rely only on air travel. Organisers plan to transport some citizens to Armenia by land. According to Ioannisyan, several companies have already booked buses for late May and early June.

At the same time, Daniel Ioannisyan says pressure is also being applied to Armenians living in Georgia who hold dual citizenship.

He said Georgian authorities are not involved in this process, unlike in Russia. “Criminal elements” are putting pressure on Armenians in Georgia. He also says there is “a Russian trace” in this case. Many Armenians travel from Georgia to Russia for work. People warn them that they will lose their income if “they do not comply with the demands.”

Commentary

Political analyst Ruben Mehrabyan said:

“Intelligence services usually act on decisions taken by political authorities. Without their approval, there would have been no public statement.

This statement means that Russia has declared war on Armenia as a sovereign state and a democracy.

In essence, Russia is trying to use thousands of Armenians as a tool against the Republic of Armenia.

All this requires a tough response from the state. The state must accept this challenge. A warning alone is not enough. In this war we must destroy these attempts at the very beginning. Otherwise they will destroy our state.

And those unfortunate businessmen who, in the fifth year of the Russia–Ukraine war, believe that their life and work in Russia offer a solution are mistaken. It is a problem. My appeal is: kill Russia within yourselves and return to Armenia. Russia is over for you if it uses you against your own state.”


—

Armenia Gears Up for Three Million Tourists in 2026, Leveraging Strategic Inve

Elizabeth Jabejian
Travel & Tour World
Mar 12 2026

Armenia is set to welcome three million tourists in 2026, driven by strategic investments, enhanced infrastructure, and its rich cultural heritage. The country is focusing on promoting its natural beauty and historical landmarks while improving services to elevate its tourism experience, ensuring a significant boost to its global appeal. With these efforts, Armenia is poised to attract travelers seeking unique experiences in a growing destination.

Armenia is witnessing a remarkable growth in its tourism sector, with projections indicating a significant rise in the number of tourist arrivals. The country is set to welcome around 3 million visitors by 2026, marking a notable achievement for its tourism industry. This surge in tourist traffic comes as Armenia positions itself as a key destination for travelers in the region and beyond, driven by the diverse range of attractions it offers and its efforts to promote itself on the global stage.

The announcement was made during the 32nd Moscow International  Travel & Hospitality Exhibition (MITT-2026), a major event that brings together industry professionals, tourism associations, regulators, and businesses to explore emerging trends in tourism. The exhibition, which opened at Moscow’s Crocus Expo International Exhibition Centre, runs through March 13, providing a platform for networking and discussions about the future of global tourism. It also gives participants a chance to connect with potential clients and partners from across the world.

Armenia’s Tourism Committee, in partnership with other stakeholders, has been working tirelessly to build the country’s reputation as a premier  travel destination. According to industry experts, the Armenian tourism sector has grown rapidly over the past few years, with the number of visitors steadily increasing. In 2025, Armenia welcomed 2.3 million tourists, a strong indicator of the country’s rising appeal to international travelers. However, this is just the beginning, as the country anticipates an even more significant influx of tourists in the coming years.

Looking ahead to 2026, Armenia’s tourism industry expects to see a 30% increase in arrivals, with the total number of visitors projected to reach 3 million. This growth comes as a result of both Armenia’s well-preserved historical heritage and its burgeoning infrastructure, which makes it a highly attractive destination for those seeking new and exciting places to visit in Europe and Asia. The development of Armenia’s tourism sector is being driven by both private and public sector initiatives, with the government focusing on sustainable tourism practices, better infrastructure, and stronger international marketing efforts.

One of the primary reasons for this growth in tourism is Armenia’s unique positioning as a gateway to both Europe and Asia. Its rich history, diverse culture, and stunning landscapes have long made it a destination of interest to travelers from around the world. However, in recent years, Armenia has actively sought to elevate its status by diversifying its tourism offerings and promoting lesser-known attractions beyond its capital city, Yerevan. These efforts are paying off, as more visitors are discovering Armenia’s cultural, natural, and historical treasures.

Russia remains the most significant source of tourism for Armenia, with around 40% of all international visitors coming from Russia. This is no surprise, given the close geographical and cultural ties between the two countries. Russia has long been a primary market for Armenian tourism, with a shared history and a deep connection between the people of both nations. Armenian officials have noted that Russian tourists are particularly fond of visiting Yerevan, Armenia’s vibrant capital, as well as other popular destinations, including Lake Sevan, Areni, and Dilijan.

Lake Sevan is one of Armenia’s most iconic natural landmarks, attracting tourists with its breathtaking beauty and recreational opportunities. Known for its crystal-clear waters and picturesque surroundings, Lake Sevan is a favorite among nature lovers and those looking to relax in a serene environment. Areni, on the other hand, is famous for its ancient wine caves and rich winemaking tradition. Visitors to Areni have the chance to explore the historical vineyards and sample some of Armenia’s finest wines, a must-visit for any wine enthusiast. Dilijan, commonly known as the “Switzerland of Armenia,” provides travelers with a serene escape surrounded by vibrant forests and stunning mountain landscapes. The town is known for its natural beauty and is a popular destination for those seeking outdoor adventures.

In addition to these established destinations, Armenia is also focusing on promoting its lesser-known regions, hoping to diversify its tourism offerings and attract a broader range of visitors. By focusing on sustainable tourism practices and the preservation of its cultural and natural heritage, Armenia aims to ensure that its growth as a tourism hub is both responsible and beneficial to local communities.

Armenia’s tourism success can also be attributed to the ongoing improvements in the country’s infrastructure, such as better transportation links, upgraded accommodation options, and improved services for international tourists. These upgrades make it easier for visitors to travel around the country and enjoy a comfortable stay, further enhancing Armenia’s attractiveness as a destination.

The country is also increasing its visibility in the global market, participating in major tourism fairs such as MITT-2026 and working with international travel agencies to promote its tourism offerings. With these efforts, Armenia hopes to not only maintain its current growth trajectory but also continue expanding its reach in the global tourism market.

Armenia is set to attract three million tourists in 2026, driven by strategic investments, its rich history, natural beauty, and enhanced tourism services, positioning it as a rising global destination.

As Armenia prepares for a surge in visitors in 2026, it is clear that the country is becoming an increasingly important player in the global tourism industry. With its rich cultural heritage, natural beauty, and modern infrastructure, Armenia is poised to offer tourists an unforgettable experience, attracting millions of visitors from around the world. As the country continues to grow and evolve, Armenia is on track to become one of the most sought-after destinations in the region. With the continued focus on sustainable tourism and responsible growth, the future of Armenian tourism looks incredibly promising.

—

Turkish Press: Turkish Airlines launches Yerevan flights amid Armenia-Türkiye

Emil Lazarian
Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Mar 12 2026

Turkish Airlines inaugurated direct Istanbul–Yerevan flights on March 11, marking a new step in the slow rapprochement between Armenia and Türkiye, which have never established formal diplomatic relations.

The move comes as Yerevan and Ankara pursue a cautious normalization after decades of hostility and Ankara’s support for Azerbaijan in its long-running conflict with Armenia.

“Flights on the route Istanbul-Yerevan-Istanbul will be operated daily,” Armenia International Airports company said after the inaugural flight of the Turkish flag carrier landed at Yerevan international airport.

The frequency of flights will gradually increase in the coming months, the statement added.

Armenia and Türkiye have no diplomatic ties and their land border has remained closed since 1993.

In 2021, the two countries appointed special envoys to explore a path toward reconciliation.

Direct commercial flights between the two countries resumed in 2022 after a two-year suspension.

Since then, Ankara and Yerevan have taken several limited steps aimed at improving ties.

They agreed to allow direct air cargo trade and to open the land border to third-country nationals, though the frontier has yet to reopen in effect.

In another modest confidence-building move, the two governments announced simplified visa procedures for holders of diplomatic, special and service passports in December 2025.

—

Armenian Advocate: Why the Iran-US War Could Be a Turning Point for Armenia

Ani Kharatian
EWTN, UK
March 12 2026

For former military commander and political figure Jirair Sefilian, who is advocating for the US to become Armenia’s strategic protector, the ongoing conflict could reshape the region — and open new opportunities for his country.

Solène Tadié, March 12, 2026 – National Catholic Register

Scenes of Armenians publicly expressing solidarity with Iran amid the war might surprise outside observers. Armenia is a predominantly Christian nation that has endured centuries of conflict and persecution from Muslim powers in the region. Yet geopolitics has produced unlikely alignments.

Facing pressure from its traditional rivals — Sunni-majority Azerbaijan and Turkey — the world’s oldest Christian kingdom has long relied on Shiite Iran as a strategic counterweight and key economic partner. The war between Iran, Israel, and the US could therefore have profound consequences for the South Caucasus.

According to Lebanese-born Armenian activist Jirair Sefilian, the shifting balance of power brings both serious risks and potential strategic opportunities.

A former military commander and leading figure in the pro-Western National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and the Sasna Tsrer Pan-Armenian Party, Sefilian has spent years advocating for Armenia to pivot away from reliance on Russia and instead deepen its strategic relationship with the U.S.

“Our natural place is with the Western world,” he told the Register. His movement also calls for the recovery of Nagorno-Karabakh, lost to Azerbaijan in 2023, through diplomatic and military means. In this interview, he assesses how the Iran-U.S. war could deeply reshape Armenia’s strategic landscape.

 

The ongoing Iran-U.S. war is transforming the strategic environment of the Middle East. What impact could this conflict have on the country that has been a long-time economic partner of Iran?

The war between the U.S. and Israel on one side and Iran on the other fundamentally reshapes the security assumptions of the entire South Caucasus. For Armenia, this moment represents a potential turning point — both dangerous and transformative.

For many years, Iran played the role of a silent strategic counterweight to the ambitions of Turkey and Azerbaijan. Even without formal alliances, Tehran’s presence helped prevent a direct military push against Armenia’s southern Syunik province. With Iran now weakened and internally focused because of the war, that deterrent effect is greatly reduced.

At the same time, however, we may see a stronger presence of the U.S. in the region, both in the security domain and in economic initiatives such as the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP). This could eventually create new strategic opportunities for Armenia, but in the immediate term, the risks are significant.

 

What are the main risks?

The southern Armenian province of Syunik could become extremely vulnerable if instability spreads across the Iranian border.

One possible scenario is the arrival of tens of thousands of Iranian refugees fleeing the conflict. At the same time, if Iran is destabilized, the deterrent that prevented Azerbaijan from attempting military action against Armenia may weaken.

The second risk is economic. Armenia depends heavily on its border crossing with Iran at Meghri-Norduz, which is one of the country’s most important economic lifelines. Up to 40% of Armenia’s imports pass through that route. If that corridor is disrupted, Armenia could face serious supply shortages.

Moreover, Armenia currently relies on a delicate gas-for-electricity exchange with Iran. If Iranian energy infrastructure is damaged during the war, Armenia could lose this source of supply and become entirely dependent on Russian gas via Georgia.

 

How could this conflict reshape the regional balance of power?

In the immediate term, the weakening of Iran shifts the regional balance of power in favor of Azerbaijan and Turkey. However, this situation may not last.

The strategic alliance between India and Israel could help limit Turkish-Azerbaijani ambitions against Armenia. At the same time, tensions between Israel and Turkey are increasing and could reshape regional alignments in unexpected ways.

If stability eventually returns and a north-south economic corridor develops from India through Iran, Armenia and Georgia toward Europe, Armenia could gain a new geopolitical role as a transit country. In that scenario, Armenia’s strategic importance — and therefore its security — could increase significantly.

 

What should be Armenia’s diplomatic strategy while the war continues?

In the short term, Armenia must maintain strategic ambiguity. The country should avoid becoming a platform for either side in the conflict so that it does not become a direct target.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s recent policies, which many see as excessively accommodating toward Turkey, could place Armenia in a difficult position if tensions grow between Israel and Turkey — a scenario that many observers consider increasingly plausible.

Armenia must therefore work to build stronger and more meaningful relations with the Western world, including with Israel and India. In my view, the current government is not well prepared to manage this strategic realignment.

With NDA, we have been advocating in D.C. for Armenia to obtain the status of a major non-NATO Ally of the U.S. This would allow Armenia to acquire modern weapons and strengthen its defense capabilities.

The recent war in the region demonstrated how dangerous the technological imbalance has become. Azerbaijan has been purchasing advanced weapons systems from Israel and other countries. Without modernizing our military, Armenia cannot defend itself.

 

You have been active in Armenian politics for decades. What has been the central thread of your political commitment?

For me, the central issue has always been the absence of a truly independent Armenian state. During the past 30 years, we have not been allowed to build a fully sovereign state.

Armenia formally exists as a state, but in reality our sovereignty has been constantly limited by external powers. My political engagement has always been driven by the belief that Armenia must finally achieve real independence and the capacity to defend its own national interests.

 

You have often criticized Russia’s role in the region. Why?

Today, we are witnessing a major geopolitical shift in the region. Russia is gradually withdrawing from the South Caucasus, while other powers — including Turkey, Armenia’s historic enemy — are trying to fill that space. At the same time, Turkey’s position in the region is becoming stronger.

In the current international system, there is only one power capable of containing Turkey, and that is the U.S. Armenia has often been trapped between Russia and Turkey, but culturally and historically, we belong much more to the Western world.

Russia and Turkey operate within a system increasingly connected to China’s influence. For Armenia, remaining neutral between these centers of power is no longer realistic. We must make a strategic choice, and our natural place is with the U.S. and the Western world.

 

You are also a strong critic of the Armenian government’s approach to Nagorno-Karabakh…

In NDA’s view, the Armenian government shares responsibility for what happened in the war. Russia and Turkey both supported Azerbaijan, and Armenian forces were severely constrained in their ability to respond. There were decisions taken by the leadership that limited Armenia’s ability to defend itself.

The government’s strategy was based on the belief that if Armenia gave up Karabakh, peace would follow. But we now see that even after the loss of Karabakh, Azerbaijan continues to make new demands: territorial claims, demands regarding the Armenian constitution, and pressure to abandon the campaign of recognition of the Armenian genocide. This shows that the problem goes much deeper.

 

Is there any diplomatic way to restore Artsakh to Armenia’s political horizon?

First, we must understand that the policy of separating Artsakh from Armenia was originally encouraged by Moscow in the early 1990s. Russia wanted the conflict to remain unresolved because it allowed Moscow to maintain influence in the region.

Instead of formally unifying Artsakh with Armenia, it was kept formally independent, an ambiguous status that allowed external powers to intervene continuously and eventually take over the enclave.

There were decisions by the League of Nations in 1920 — approved by major powers including France, Britain, Italy, and Japan – that defined borders in the region [whereby] Artsakh was part of Armenia. If Armenia had truly independent leadership, it could pursue diplomatic avenues through international courts to restore Armenia’s legal claim.

 

Armenia is often called the world’s oldest Christian nation. What role should Christianity play in the country’s revival?

Christianity is an essential part of Armenian identity. Without adopting Christianity as a national religion in 301, Armenia would not have survived in this region.

Today, we may be facing another civilizational moment. We are encouraged to see signs of a revival of Christian values in the West. These values are also the foundation of the Western understanding of individual freedom and rights. In NDA’s view, only Christianity can save Western civilization.

Solène Tadié is the Europe Correspondent for the National Catholic Register. She is French-Swiss and grew up in Paris. After graduating from Roma III University with a degree in journalism, she began reporting on Rome and the Vatican for Aleteia. She joined L’Osservatore Romano in 2015, where she successively worked for the French section and the Cultural pages of the Italian daily newspaper. She has also collaborated with several French-speaking Catholic media organizations. Solène has a bachelor’s degree in philosophy from the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, and recently translated in French (for Editions Salvator) Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy by the Acton Institute’s Fr. Robert Sirico.

This article was originally published at National Catholic Register.

—