—
The US-Armenia Relationship and the Future of the South Caucasus: A Conversati
As the Trump administration’s Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity initiative reshapes United States engagement in the South Caucasus, Armenia stands at the center of a pivotal diplomatic moment. Ongoing Armenia-Azerbaijan peace negotiations are creating new opportunities for regional stability, with Washington playing an increasingly active role in supporting the process. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s recent electoral victory opens new avenues for cooperation and strengthens the prospects for sustained diplomatic engagement amid these developments. The Caucasus as a whole is emerging as a critical theater for US foreign policy, with Armenia’s strategic positioning making it a key partner in the region.
Join Senior Fellow Michael Doran for a candid conversation with H.E. Narek Mkrtchyan, ambassador of the Republic of Armenia to the United States of America as they discuss the developments, challenges, and opportunities defining the US-Armenia relationship.
To request an RSVP, please reach out to Natalie Arbatman at [email protected].
—
Conscience or convenience: What’s behind Israel’s recognition of Armenian Gen
The moral question, however, never changed. If recognizing the Armenian tragedy is a moral imperative today, why was it not one in 2006, or in 1996? Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar attends an honorary session at Paraguay’s bicameral Congress in Asuncion on November 24, 2025, as part of his official visit to the country.(photo credit: DANIEL DUARTE/ AFP via Getty Images)
For decades, successive Israeli governments declined to recognize the Armenian Genocide. Politicians from across the political spectrum proposed doing so, yet every government ultimately chose not to, citing strategic and diplomatic considerations.
The moral question, however, never changed. If recognizing the Armenian tragedy is a moral imperative today, why was it not one in 2006, or in 1996?
The answer has never been about morality.
According to longstanding reports, Israel’s public broadcaster prepared a documentary in the 1980s about the mass killings of Armenians in 1915. The film was never aired. The reported reason was pressure from the government and the security establishment after Turkey, then one of Israel’s closest regional partners, allegedly warned that broadcasting it could jeopardize a sensitive security operation. Whether every detail of that account is accurate is almost beside the point. What matters is that, for decades, Israeli governments openly treated this issue as one of national interest rather than moral principle.
Today, that strategic reality has changed.
MKS ATTEND a House committee meeting at the Knesset, the Israeli Parliament in Jerusalem, on June 16, 2026. (credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)
National interests have always shaped the decision
There is nothing unusual about that. States shape foreign policy according to national interests every day. But if that is what happened here, it would be more honest to describe this decision as a diplomatic gesture dressed in moral language rather than as the fulfillment of a moral obligation.
Supporters of the government’s decision may argue that timing is irrelevant. Doing the right thing late, they might say, is still better than never doing it at all.
That argument raises another difficult question. If recognition is truly based on an unchanging moral principle, would a future Israeli government ever be justified in reversing it if relations with Turkey were one day fully restored? Imagine a future Turkish leader committed to fully restoring the strategic partnership with Israel who asks Jerusalem to revoke its recognition as part of a broader reconciliation. Would Israel refuse because moral principles cannot be negotiated? Or would the political calculus change once again?
If the answer depends on the geopolitical circumstances of the day, then morality is no longer guiding policy. Policy is guiding morality.
History should be left to historians
This is precisely why questions surrounding the events of 1915 should remain primarily in the hands of historians rather than politicians. Historians work with archival documents, eyewitness testimony, military records, and competing interpretations. Their responsibility is to follow the evidence wherever it leads. Governments, by contrast, inevitably make decisions through the lens of present-day diplomatic interests.
Important aspects of the events of 1915 remain the subject of historical debate, including the wartime context, the role of Armenian paramilitary forces, Russian financial and military involvement, the Russian Empire’s displacement and ethnic cleansing of Muslim populations in the Caucasus, and the decisions taken by the Ottoman authorities. These questions belong in archives, universities, and scholarly journals, not in cabinet resolutions shaped by the diplomatic priorities of the moment.
Once governments begin issuing official judgments on historical controversies more than a century after the fact, where does the process end? Should elected officials determine the accepted interpretation of every disputed historical tragedy? Or should they leave those questions to historians whose profession is to study the past?
Supporters of the government’s decision often point to Holocaust recognition as a precedent. At first glance, the comparison appears persuasive. Yet the two cases are fundamentally different.
When European states recognize the Holocaust and criminalize its denial, they are not simply expressing an opinion about history. In many cases, they are confronting their own historical responsibility. Nazi Germany planned and carried out the systematic extermination of the Jewish people, while numerous European governments, institutions, and collaborators participated directly or indirectly in that crime. In such cases, recognition is inseparable from accepting responsibility.
Israel’s recognition of events that took place in the Ottoman Empire in 1915 is fundamentally different. Israel bears no historical responsibility for those events. The same is true for many other countries whose parliaments periodically vote on the issue. Honoring the memory of Armenian victims, supporting historical research, preserving memorials, and encouraging open academic discussion do not require transforming a century-old historical tragedy into an instrument of contemporary political messaging. This is especially true at a time when Armenia itself is moving closer to normalization with Turkey, and when its leadership has made clear that it does not want the events of 1915 to be weaponized by other countries for their own political purposes.
Principle or political timing?
History deserves careful scholarship. Diplomacy requires difficult choices.
Confusing one with the other ultimately weakens both.
When governments discover their conscience only after the geopolitical risks have disappeared, what they are celebrating is not morality.
It is convenience.
Dr. Elina Bardach-Yalov is a former member of Knesset, a former advisor to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a research associate at Jerusalem Multidisciplinary College, and head of the Antisemitism Watch NGO.
Why isn’t the Armenian government celebrating the official Israeli recognitio
The Israeli government’s recent decision to officially recognize the Armenian Genocide sparked predictably angry reactions from Turkey and Azerbaijan; however, the reaction from Armenia has largely been muted.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan downplayed the significance of the Israeli government’s move while speaking to reporters in Yerevan.
“We see no need to respond because we believe that refraining from entering into the issue of the weaponization of the Armenian Genocide is in the interests of the Republic of Armenia,” Pashinyan said.
The Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which has previously noted major genocide announcements or memorials around the world, did not issue any statement regarding the Israeli government’s acknowledgment.
The Armenian National Committee also released a tepid statement welcoming the move, while also accusing Israel of playing a role in the deaths of Armenians during the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict.
A harsher reaction to the cabinet’s decision was offered by the former Armenian parliament member Mihran Hakobyan, who wrote, “It is the pinnacle of immoral cynicism that the 1915 Armenian Genocide is being ‘recognized’ by a fascist state which, from the moment of its founding, has been — after Turkey — the most active in fighting against the international recognition of the Armenian Genocide, has directly participated in the patricide of Armenians in Artsakh, and is carrying out an obvious genocide in Gaza.”
A similar position was expressed by Serj Tankian, an Armenian-American and the lead singer of the heavy metal band System Of A Down, which is composed entirely of Armenian descendants. In an expletive-laced reaction video posted to Instagram, he accused the Israeli government of using Armenian history and pain for “political advantage.”
“For many years, Israel’s government used AIPAC to lobby the U.S. Congress to not recognize the Armenian Genocide, to prevent Congress from recognizing the Armenian Genocide due to their relationship with Turkey, their intelligence sharing with Turkey, etc.,” Tankian said.
“Today, the Netanyahu cabinet decided to recognize the Armenian Genocide of 1915, a genocide that led to Hitler thinking that he could do what he could do to the Jews in the 1930s and 40s,” he continued.
“The fact that this government is already committing genocide in Gaza and Lebanon, decided to recognize the genocide of my grandparents, is the worst f—ing thing that they could have done to Armenians by using our history, our genocide, our pain to their political advantage,” Tankian said.
The harsh words by Hakobyan and Tankian illustrate the pain many Armenians feel over the failure of the Israeli government to officially recognize the genocide, which many historians believe led directly to the Holocaust.
However, not all Armenian leaders reacted as cynically to the Israeli cabinet’s move. Bishop Koryun Baghdasaryan, a senior leader and dean of the manor of Jerusalem’s Armenian Patriarchate, said that in making this move the government “fulfilled its moral duty.”
“It means a lot for the State of Israel, for the Jewish people,” Bishop Baghdasaryan told The Jerusalem Post, “because as a nation that went through the Holocaust, and right after the Holocaust established the State of Israel, it was really the moral duty for the State of Israel to recognize the Armenian Genocide.”
Predictably, the reaction by Turkey was sharp, with President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan accusing Israel of “slander.”
“There are many slander campaigns going on by this network of murderers who had the blood of 73,000 innocent Gazans on their hands,” Erdoğan said.
“In our history, there have been no genocides, no massacres, oppression, and no colonialism. Throughout our thousands of years of glorious history, there has only been justice and compassion,” he claimed.
Erdoğan’s press secretary Burhanettin Duran accused Israel of using the announcement to “cover up” its killings of Palestinians.
“Israel’s recognition of the events of 1915 as a so-called ‘genocide’ is nothing more than a futile attempt to cover up the blood of innocent Palestinians shed by its own hands, its own state terrorism in the Middle East, and its crimes against humanity committed with impunity,” Duran wrote in a post to social media.
Israel’s regional partner, Azerbaijan, which has a majority Turkic population and speaks a Turkish dialect, called the announcement “a matter of serious concern.”
“The decision by the Israeli government concerning the so-called ‘Armenian genocide’ is a matter of serious concern,” the Azerbaijan Foreign Ministry said.
“The distortion of the historical facts surrounding the events of 1915, and the reduction of a complex historical issue to a political decision without a sound legal or scholarly basis, are unacceptable,” the statement continued, while calling on the Israeli government to “reconsider this decision.”
So why has Israel’s long-sought recognition provoked such a tepid reaction among many Armenians? The answer lies in changing political realities of the major parties involved.
The Turkish government has long denied any systematic Ottoman government program targeting Armenians. While acknowledging that many Armenians were killed, the government has long blamed the deaths on “civil war” and tension related to World War I.
The genocide has its roots in the broader Islamic-Christian regional conflict stretching back over a millennium.
Most of the Anatolian Peninsula, modern-day Turkey, was captured from the Christian Byzantine Empire by the Seljuk Turks in the 11th century, which involved the massacre of many Christians. Under later dynasties, including the Ottomans, Armenian Christians refused to convert to Islam.
During World War I, many Armenians joined Russia, itself a Christian nation, in attacking the Ottomans. In retaliation, the Ottoman Empire began forcibly conscripting adult males, while forcing women, children, and the elderly out of historic Armenian territory. According to many historians, somewhere between 600,000 and 1.5 million Armenians were killed during this time.
For many years, the Israeli government supported the Turkish stance due to the political cost of angering the Turkish government. Historically, Turkey was one of Israel’s strongest regional partners in the decades before Erdoğan’s Justice and Development (AKP) party came to power.
Similarly, Israel has not wanted to offend Azerbaijan, which provides roughly 40% of Israel’s oil imports along with a strategic border with one of Israel’s primary enemies, the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Turkey had deep economic and military ties with Israel during the 1970s-1990s. With the rise of Erdoğan’s Islamist party to power, that relationship began to deteriorate rapidly, especially following the Mavi Marmara incident in 2010, when Israeli military forces intercepted several vessels from Turkey that were attempting to break the blockade on Gaza imposed after Hamas took over the Gaza Strip.
Activists in the flotilla attacked Israeli soldiers as they were boarding one of the vessels, which led to the death of several people. That incident provided Erdoğan with the political cover to disrupt relations with Israel, which had become increasingly unpopular in the religious sector of Turkey.
While the two nations attempted to restore ties, the start of the October 2023 Gaza War brought a further worsening of relations, after Erdoğan’s government refused to condemn the Hamas attacks and began accusing Israel of “genocide” at the start of the ground campaign.
With the worsening relations and increasing threats by members of the Erdoğan government being directed against Israel, the former political calculus against angering Turkey no longer holds.
Many Armenian leaders see the current recognition of the genocide in light of that Israel-Turkey conflict, not as a benevolent gesture by the Israeli government.
Similarly, the timing of the Israeli announcement appears to be aimed at causing Turkey to lose face just before it hosts the NATO Leaders’ Summit in Ankara next week, as it attempts to re-enter the F-35 program.
Additionally, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who was only recently re-elected, has been leading a movement away from demanding recognition of the 1915 genocide, and towards peace and integration with both Turkey and Azerbaijan, as part of a push to deepen ties with Europe.
As election results came in on June 8, Pashinyan said, “The people of Armenia voted for peace, regional prosperity and regional cooperation, and I hope this will be met with a positive response from Turkey and Azerbaijan.”
From Pashinyan’s perspective, the growing antagonism between Israel and Turkey, already threatening to escalate into a major regional conflict, could not come at a worse time.
Just as he attempts to move on from the defeat in and loss of Nagorno-Karabakh in 2023, in which Israel played a part by supplying weapons to Azerbaijan, the Israeli government, for reasons of its own, has chosen to acknowledge the one issue which could drive a wedge between Armenia and its neighbors.
If Israel is to convince Armenia that the recognition is not just political theater, it will have to treat the issue with the same respect that it demands for Holocaust remembrance.
J. Micah Hancock is a current Master’s student at the Hebrew University, pursuing a degree in Jewish History. Previously, he studied Biblical studies and journalism in his B.A. in the United States. He joined All Israel News as a reporter in 2022, and currently lives near Jerusalem with his wife and children.
Painting of Mount Ararat removed from Armenian president’s office
Panorama
Outgoing Armenian National Assembly Speaker Alen Simonyan paid a farewell visit to President Vahagn Khachaturyan on Thursday.
Social media users noticed that the photographs accompanying the official statement about the meeting no longer showed the painting of Mount Ararat that had previously hung on the wall of the president’s office.
A review of official reports and photographs from meetings held at the presidential residence indicates that the painting has, in fact, been absent for quite some time.
The last publicly available image showing the painting of the twin peaks of Sis and Masis (Mount Ararat) at the president’s office dates back to October 14, 2025, when Khachaturyan met with Her Majesty Queen Mathilde of Belgium.
A large photograph of Mount Ararat had also been displayed in another reception room, where Khachaturyan typically meets with foreign ambassadors accredited to Armenia, Armenian diplomats and other officials. It was in this room that Alen Simonyan met with the president. The photograph is no longer displayed there either.
When was the painting removed? Who authorized its removal? Are there currently any rooms within the presidential residence where an image of the biblical mountain is displayed?
Panorama.am attempted to reach out to the president’s office for comment. However, repeated phone calls to its Public Relations Department went unanswered.
Yerevan has become a haven for exiled Russians defying Putin
Russians fleeing their president and his war have found a home in the Armenian capital
Mount Ararat is a symbol of Yerevan and on clear days can be seen beyond the rooftops (Photo: Emad Aljumah/Getty)
Gergana Krasteva, inews.co.uk
YEREVAN, ARMENIA – Egor* was not going to wait for the Russian state to come for him. However, it wasn’t until his plane touched down at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, 24 hours after he resigned from his surveillance job with the St Petersburg police force, that he felt some level of safety.
The 31-year-old had already been turned away at the border with Georgia, and Armenia was his last shot at escaping after taking part in anti-Kremlin protests.
“I was afraid because [police] could quickly find me and I would have problems. It made me feel like I was a coward,” he tells The i Paper.
Four years have now passed since his grandmother – who vividly recalled the horrors of the Second World War – urged him to flee from another conflict. “Leave, there is no need to fight,” he remembered her telling him in April 2022, weeks after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
But escaping Russia was not the hardest part. Accepting that he will probably never return home – and that he would have to build a new life elsewhere – proved far more daunting.
“I took all the money I had… and left,” he said. “I did not think about what will happen in Russia, but about what will happen in Ukraine.”
Egor found work as a chef in a cafe alongside fellow political exiles from Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. “Today, this cafe is my family,” the now-photographer says. “I found love there and we live together, the chef and the owner are my friends.”
Yerevan, one of the world’s oldest continuously inhabited cities, has in recent years become a sanctuary for Russians fleeing war, mobilisation and political persecution. Over 60,000 Russians have arrived in Armenia since 2022, according to government data, which has helped to transform the city.
Russians fleeing Putin’s war have flocked to the streets of Yerevan, Armenia’s capital (Photo: Giovanni Mereghetti/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Walking around the centre, it is a city transformed, but also one constantly wary of the Russian bear close by, as Vladimir Putin’s war with Ukraine drags on.
As the first column of Russian tanks entered Ukrainian territory in 2022, Anya* purchased a one-way ticket to Yerevan, carrying a backpack and $100 in cash.
“There was no time to hesitate. I thought, ‘F*** it, I am leaving,’” she tells The i Paper.
Born to a Russian Armenian family in Moscow, Anya grew up feeling like an outsider in a society she describes as deeply Slavic-centric. At school, the now 36-year-old was taunted for her jet-black hair and darker complexion, and long before the war, she had found her place on the political margins.
She was part of Russia’s anti-fascist scene and, throughout her 20s, attended anti-government demonstrations. She became close to the inner circle of Alexei Navalny, the jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin critic who was found dead in 2024, allegedly poisoned with an exotic frog toxin from South America.
As the first column of tanks entered Ukrainian territory, Anya* bought a one-way ticket to Yerevan (Photo: Gergana Krasteva)
Exile has brought more than safety. Living in Yerevan, she felt free enough to come to terms with her LGBTQ sexuality.
It is another reason why returning to Russia is unthinkable, and Yerevan is now her home.
Many of those fleeing Russians who settled in Yerevan had first escaped to Georgia, crossing the only land border with Russia that remained accessible after the start of the war with Ukraine.
But as Georgia’s ruling party steered the country away from its pro-Western path, the political crackdown deepened and some Russian dissidents felt, once again, that it wasn’t safe and that it was time to move on – further away from Putin’s reach.
Yaroslav*, who worked in a bookshop in Moscow, was one of them.
His days in Yerevan are now deliberately calm – working from home for a bookshop, sketching in the evenings and watching his favourite show, The Sopranos.
But scenes of beatings and intimidation drag him back to his own experiences – being arrested during anti-government demonstrations in Tbilisi, thrown into a cell for 10 days and threatened with rape.
“Watching The Sopranos helped me understand the psychology of Georgian police and the people involved in the structure of violence,” the 25-year-old tells The i Paper, over a plate of falafel at a Russian-owned cafe.
It is only a year later that he is beginning to feel safe. Before he fled, Georgian authorities had released him and given him an ultimatum – leave or face extradition to Moscow. But returning to Russia was never an option, as he had already been arrested there for taking part in anti-war demonstrations.
Protesters shoot fireworks toward police during nationwide protests against a government decision to shelve EU membership talks in Tbilisi, Georgia, in December 2024 (Photo: Giorgi Arjevanidze/AFP via Getty Images)
Yaroslav adds: “For the first time in a long while, I didn’t feel threatened by the police or by state.”
While Yaroslav has found safety, his thoughts remain fixed on his mother and sister, who continue to live on the outskirts of Moscow, next to a railway line used to transport military equipment.
Polina*, 23, also has parents still living in Moscow, which is now experiencing a surge in Ukrainian drone strikes aimed at pressuring Putin and the Kremlin to end the war.
Since leaving Russia in 2023, first to Sri Lanka and then to Armenia, the illustrator believes she has made enemies back home with her art – so the idea of returning to reunite with her family makes her feel uneasy.
“For me, it became impossible to stay in Russia,” she says. “Propaganda was everywhere. I couldn’t tolerate it. It was unfair to stay silent, but it was impossible to speak openly, too.”
Polina now works with other Russian artists in Yerevan on anti-war projects, but says that none of it can be published in Russia. Still, she says, “Here, at least, I know I am not participating in the war machine”.
‘It became impossible to stay in Russia,’ says illustrator Polina* (Photo: Gergana Krasteva)
The artist explains that she is looking after the dog while the family arranges travel documents to bring it to their new home. It is another example of the tight-knit community the exiled Russians have created in the country.
In many ways, Egor’s life has gone through the biggest change, having worked within the Russian state as a police officer before fleeing the country.
While he does not regret his decision to leave, he misses the opportunity of not being a guest in another country. “I have a homeland. The Murmansk region… In Russia, people talk about the motherland as a fairy tale,” he says.
But he also describes himself as a realist and doesn’t see “any prospects” for change in Russia, even when Putin eventually dies. As such, he is focused on creating a new life for himself.
“My planning horizon is half a year to a year,” he says. “Now, I’m in Armenia and I would like to become a citizen of the country.
Armenians oppose the weaponization of genocide in the war between Netanyahu an
On Sunday, the Israeli cabinet approved a proposal for formal recognition of the genocide, which now goes before the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, for a vote. This has sparked criticism in Turkey and Azerbaijan. For Armenians, it is a political move that reflects current tensions and conflicts. For Kegham Balian, an activist with “Save The ArQ,” Israel’s action is an “insult to the memory” of the 1.5 million murdered by the Ottoman Empire.
Milan (AsiaNews) – Kegham Balian, a prominent figure in Jerusalem’s Armenian community, has launched a frontal attack against the Israeli government after it decided to recognise the Armenian genocide.
For him, this is an “insult to the memory” of the approximately 1.5 million Armenians murdered by the Ottoman Empire. More than a century after the genocide, they are being used as a “bargaining chip” to fuel tensions with Turkey and anger its leaders.
A leading figure in the movement defending the Armenian Quarter of the Holy City, Balian has fought numerous battles for the rights of Christians and the defence of their property, like the long-running dispute over the Cows’ Garden (Goveroun Bardez).
“In 2020,” the activist writes on X, “during the 44 Day War, Israel, ALONGSIDE Turkey, supplied Azerbaijan with intelligence and cutting-edge weaponry, leading to the killing of 5,000 Armenian soldiers, culminating in the ethnic cleansing of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh), and the mass exodus of 150,000 Armenians from their 2,000-year-old homeland.” In light of this, “We will not allow the suffering of our people to be used for political weaponization.”
Israel and the (Armenian) genocide
On Sunday, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s cabinet unanimously approved a bill formally recognising the Armenian genocide, sending the measure, introduced by Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, to the Knesset for a vote.
The minister condemned efforts to deny or distort the historical record. “It’s never too late to do the right thing,” he said after the vote, calling recognition of the Armenian genocide “both a moral and historical duty”.
If approved by the Knesset, the official recognition would put an end to decades of silence and disinterest on the issue, especially given the strategic relations, at least in the past, with Turkey and Azerbaijan.
The issue has been discussed in Israel for years, with individual lawmakers, cabinet ministers, and parliamentary committees expressing timid support for recognition.
A relatively small group of Israeli politicians, academics, and intellectuals has long argued that the country had a moral obligation to take a step toward recognition. However, no government or government body has yet approved an official proposal to this effect.
By contrast, Turkey continues to deny that the systematic mass killings, deportations, and persecution of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire constitute “genocide”.
Polish-Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin coined the term in 1944, citing the mass killing of Armenians as one of the defining events that led to develop the concept.
Israel Charny, founder of the Jerusalem Institute on the Holocaust and Genocide, is among those who have called for recognition beyond convenience or political contingency, forcefully criticising Israel’s official public policy, calling it a form of denial.
In 2001, he publicly rebuked then-Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres for referring to the tragic events of 1915 as “Armenian allegations”, and for believing that they did not constitute genocide and should not be compared to the Holocaust.
In 2000, Yair Auron, another leading scholar, published the book The Banality of Denial, in which he examined Israeli governments’ refusal to acknowledge the Armenian genocide in order to preserve relations with Turkey.
For over 20 years, some Knesset members have sought (in vain) to recognise the Armenian genocide, with the left-wing Meretz party playing a leading role.
Beginning in 2008, its then-leader Haim Oron succeeded in placing the issue on a committee agenda for the first time, but years of hearings have yielded no results. In 2016, his successor, MK Zehava Galon, noted how, “Year after year, we give false hope to those gathered here.”
On that occasion, the Education Committee approved a non-binding recognition of the genocide, although the measure was not adopted by all Knesset members.
The Turkish-Azeri front
Since the start of the war in Gaza in 2023 and Turkey’s repeated accusations that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians, some Israeli officials have increasingly invoked the Armenian issue to attack Ankara and the Turkish government.
As early as January 2024, after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan declared that the country was presenting legal evidence to support South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz responded by turning the tables.
Accusing Turkey of hypocrisy as “a country with the Armenian genocide in its past,” he harshly attacked his Turkish rival: “We remember the Armenians, the Kurds. Your history speaks for itself.”
However, for Armenians, this sudden shift in rhetoric from senior Israeli ministers and officials appears more like a political move driven by cynicism and self-interest than a true acknowledgement.
In this regard, Jerusalem-based Armenian activist Setrag Balian, co-founder of the Save The ArQ movement, which advocates for the preservation of the Old City’s Armenian neighbourhood, claims that Israel is simply weaponising the Armenian genocide against Turkey in response to its accusations of Israeli genocide in Gaza.
Among those who have criticised the Israeli leadership’s “self-interested” choice is Azerbaijan, which had forged a deep alliance over the years with Israel, calling it a “distortion of historical facts” by the Netanyahu government.
The South Caucasian country, which has close ties with Israel and has repeatedly fought with neighbouring Armenia, especially over control of Nagorno-Karabakh, has taken a position similar to Turkey’s.
“The decision by the Israeli government concerning the so-called ‘Armenian genocide’ is a matter of serious concern,” reads a statement by the Azerbaijani foreign ministry. “The distortion of the historical facts surrounding the events of 1915, and the reduction of a complex historical issue to a political decision without a sound legal or scholarly basis, are unacceptable.”
For the Azerbaijani government, “Such actions do not contribute to reconciliation or mutual understanding. Instead, they deepen existing divisions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability in the region. We call on the Israeli government to reconsider this decision.”
Armenians: abuses and violations
In the triangle between Israel, Turkey, and Azerbaijan, what remains are the Armenian people in the Holy Land and in their homeland, with the government in Yerevan greeting the Jewish state’s move with silence and coldness, to put it mildly.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that he feels no need to respond to Israel’s decision and the reactions of regional countries, adding that he does not intend to turn the genocide into a political weapon because it is not in his country’s interest.
Armenian Christians in the Holy Land, however, remember the long list of persecutions and violations of religious freedom that they have recently experienced, with an escalation in the number of attacks.
Hagop Djernazian, leader of the Armenian community in Jerusalem, said that “Israel had the opportunity to recognize the Armenian Genocide on moral grounds, but Israel missed that opportunity.”
According to the Religious Freedom Data Center, anti-Christian intolerance is on the rise, with around 100 incidents recorded in the first six months of 2026 alone, with the overall number for the whole year expected to exceed the 181 cases reported in 2025.
The incidents include spitting, verbal abuse, vandalism, grave desecration, and graffiti, mostly in Jerusalem’s Old City, near Mount Zion, and the Armenian Patriarchate.
The Armenian Quarter is the smallest of the four that make up the Old City, covering around 14 per cent of the total area. Located in the southwestern corner of the Old City, it is accessible through the Zion Gate (Bab al-Nabi Dahoud) and the Jaffa Gate (Bab al-Khalil).
The Cows’ Garden, a plot of land owned by the patriarchate that was the target of an attempted expropriation for a settler settlement, is among the most emblematic examples of violations in recent years.
Observers note that Armenians also live under Israeli occupation and face a critical struggle for survival due to, not only to Jewish fanatics, but also to the decisions of corrupt clerics who care more about their own interests than the future of the community.
CC: As Christians are attacked in Israel, government shows little concern
In the predominantly Christian town of Taybeh, 10 extended families have emigrated because of pressure and attacks by Israeli settlers.
Christians attend Mass in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in the Old City of Jerusalem on May 7.Heidi Levine / Heidi Levine/FTWP
JERUSALEM — The stone footpath begins at the tomb of King David, revered by Jews, and curves past the room where Christians believe Jesus held the Last Supper. Nearby, the Dormition Abbey towers over a site where many believe Mary slept before being taken to heaven.
Steeped in history and faith, this quiet alleyway in Jerusalem’s Mount Zion was the site of a brazen attack in April, when a Jewish Israeli man from the occupied West Bank shoved a French Catholic nun to the ground and kicked her out of “religious hostility,” according to Israeli police.
The assault, recorded by surveillance cameras in broad daylight, shocked many. But not Nikodemus Schnabel, abbot of the Dormition Abbey, which the nun had visited before she was attacked.
Christians today are “hit, spit at, beaten,” said Schnabel, who has experienced it all — and worse. “There was a video in this case, but you can be sure there are so, so many undocumented things.”
“Believe me,” he sighed, “this is not the case of one lost soul.”
Across the Holy Land, Christians are being targeted by a tide of hostility and violence — attacks that risk drawing the ire of Christians in the United States, including evangelicals who are traditionally among Israel’s most ardent American supporters.
In Jerusalem, Christians say they are routinely harassed by ultra-Orthodox Jews and huddle in fear when Religious Zionists rampage through the Old City, destroying property during their processions.
Twenty miles away, in the West Bank’s only predominantly Christian town, Taybeh, the population is dwindling after years of unrelenting attacks and economic pressure from armed Jewish settlers.
U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee, an evangelical pastor who has often spoken in Israel’s defense, visited Taybeh last year after settlers allegedly set fire to its most famous landmark, the 1,500-year-old Church of St. George, and denounced what he called “an act of terror,” though he later retracted that statement.
Meanwhile, a string of social media posts from neighboring Lebanon, where Israeli soldiers have recorded themselves smashing Christian icons and defacing churches despite calls for discipline from military commanders, have reinforced a sense that animosity toward Christians is being normalized under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, the most right-wing in Israel’s history.
For decades, Christian monastics and pilgrims, easily identifiable with their robes and crosses, faced harassment in Jerusalem. But the number of incidents nearly doubled from 2023 to 2025 and is on track to reach a new high this year, according to the Rossing Center, an interreligious organization in the city.
At different times in the past 18 months, the two joint-chief rabbis of Israel, David Yosef and Kalman Ber, have issued statements condemning attacks on Christians as antithetical to Jewish values and as a “severe phenomenon” that “must be eradicated.”
But local and national political leaders have often kept their silence.
After the attack on the nun on April 28, which drew condemnation from the French Consulate, the Israeli Foreign Ministry was one of the few official voices that issued a statement, calling the assault a “shameless act” that contradicted Israel’s founding values of “respect, coexistence, and freedom of religion.”
Netanyahu’s office did not comment at the time of the assault but in a statement to the Washington Post said: “We have made it clear that any acts of violence and vandalism of this type will not be tolerated. Those who commit such acts will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
When an earlier wave of harassment targeting Christians made headlines in 2017, Itamar Ben Gvir, then a settler activist and lawyer, gave a radio interview to defend spitting at Christian monks and churches as “an ancient Jewish tradition.”
“I don’t think this represents any violation,” said Ben Gvir, who today leads Israeli law enforcement as minister of national security, a post he was given despite having been convicted of supporting a Jewish terrorist organization and inciting racism. “Why do we turn this into a criminal matter?”
A spokesperson for Ben Gvir did not respond to requests seeking comment.
Francesco Ielpo, the custodian of the Holy Land and a senior Vatican official in Jerusalem, said he feared the growing influence of Israel’s far right will push Christians in Israel and the Palestinian territories to leave, accelerating a pattern of emigration among a prosperous and well-educated minority group.
Although Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics says the population of Christians in Israel and Jerusalem has ticked up about 1% annually to 184,200 at the end of 2025, or 1.9% of Israel’s population, Christian leaders say the official data does not reflect that many Christians included in the census mostly live abroad.
In the West Bank, the Christian population has hovered between 40,000 and 50,000 for years, as emigration balances out births.
“The general atmosphere is this: Many people are afraid,” Ielpo said. “I can give good works and health assistance. I can give good schools. But all this is not enough. You need hope to remain.”
Christian village under siege
From a vantage point an hour north of Jerusalem’s Old City, Suleiman Khouriyeh pointed in every direction to explain how the residents of Taybeh — a village that, according to the Gospels, once gave refuge to Jesus and his disciples — now cannot find relief themselves.
Khouriyeh, the mayor, was blocked from harvesting his 4-acre olive grove after settlers closed in from the west, seized his land and built a fence. Across the valley, a local business owner, Hanna Massis, was building a multistory hotel but halted construction because of settler attacks.
Bashir Marouf, the owner of a house on a street where settlers often arrive at night to set up roadblocks to disrupt the local traffic, had long fled.
To the south was Roland Bassir’s cement factory, its office windows shattered and its machinery destroyed from a recent attack. Initially, in late 2023, settlers set up a single tent on a nearby hilltop. One tent became a few trailers, then a small farm.
Over the next two years, settlers from the outpost began taking their cattle to graze inside the factory premises and forcing Bassir’s workers to leave in the middle of the day, according to Bassir and videos his employees recorded.
They lofted an Israeli flag, vandalized cars, and smashed equipment. During two attacks, on Sept. 14 and March 14, they shot in the air with rifles, Bassir said. Struggling to keep the factory running, Bassir has laid off nearly all of his 45 employees.
After sinking more than $100,000 into the business, Bassir was ready to abandon it, he said. He has already applied for a U.S. visa. “If I get it, I will leave tomorrow,” Bassir said. “There is no future. Every day I think it might be my last day here, because I might be killed.”
In the past 10 years, 10 extended families have left Taybeh for the United States, Latin America, and Spain – a significant exodus for a town of 1,500 residents, Khouriyeh said.
“They can’t handle living here,” Khouriyeh said. “It’s really hard, especially for young men who don’t have jobs and are forced to leave. What we see is Israelis taking the whole area.”
On a recent afternoon, Khouriyeh sat in his office with municipal employees, venting about the Western governments that they believed should do more to protect them — if not as Palestinians, then at least as Christians.
In 2024, many Taybeh residents celebrated when Donald Trump was reelected as president, believing he was the “peace president,” recalled Khouriyeh and the acting mayor during the recent election period, Khaldoun Hanna.
The following year, the village felt relieved when Huckabee, Trump’s new ambassador to Israel, visited.
But their appreciation turned to fury when Huckabee retracted his statement after Israeli police denied finding clear evidence of an arson attack.
Months later, villagers found clips of Huckabee telling Tucker Carlson in an interview that Israel had the divine right to claim as its own the Palestinian territories and parts of Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq.
“Someone ask Huckabee, is he America First or Israel First,” a young municipal employee, Jeries Taye’e, angrily demanded.
“He’s Israel First,” Hanna snorted.
Mayor Khouriyeh raised his hands, then posed a question: Without a change in policy in Israel — and in Washington — what will happen to the Christian population here?
“We have the oldest holy sites: the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the Church of the Nativity,” Khouriyeh said. “But what is the value of an empty church without Christians?
International dimensions
At a time when Israel already faces international isolation and criticism over its actions in Gaza, particularly from the Islamic world, tensions with Christians could further undermine a crucial pillar of support, some Israeli analysts warn.
In America, Christian conservatives — who traditionally leaned pro-Israel — have questioned Vice President JD Vance at public events about Israel’s treatment of Christians, noted Avishay Ben Sasson-Gordis, an expert on U.S.-Israel relations at the Institute for National Security Studies, a Tel Aviv think tank that advises the government. Christian nationalist commentators who are influential on the American right, like Carlson and Candace Owens, also frequently cite reports of attacks and harassment against Christians when they lambaste Israel, Ben Sasson-Gordis said.
“The violence against Christians and the [Israeli] political figures who encourage it are bad enough that something needs to be done about them,” he said. “But it’s also important to pay attention to the way it alienates Israel’s friends and provides tools for Israel’s detractors.”
These days, the slew of headlines suggests that anti-Christian sentiment has grown particularly quickly among Israeli youths, said Yisca Harani, the founder of the Religious Freedom Data Center, a Jewish Israeli group that operates a hotline for reporting attacks against Christians in Jerusalem.
Harani now organizes a group of about 100 Jewish volunteers to walk alongside Christian nuns whenever they leave their homes, and since the May attack, nuns have called Harani every day requesting a protective presence. The problem begins with education, said Harani, an observant Jewish Israeli who has pushed Jewish religious schools to teach more about the history of Christians in the Holy Land.
“Half of Israel is greatly affected by the rhetoric of Jewish supremacy and Jewish exclusivity,” Harani said. “What can only be the outcome if in school they say: ‘All gentiles want your annihilation, remember what the Christians did, remember what Hamas did.’ People therefore look at the world through glasses of fear, estrangement, and, finally, animosity.”
For Nikodemus, the Dormition Abbey abbot, the change in atmosphere is more easily explained.
When he first traveled to Israel in 2003, he saw advertisements at the Tel Aviv airport showcasing the country as the home of Christian holy sites. The minister of tourism at the time held receptions where the young Benedictine monk was welcomed. But over the years, the occasional curses that Schnabel encountered in dark alleys became spitting and open confrontations in broad daylight.
“That’s the difference between then and now,” Schnabel said. “The government.”
One major shock for Schnabel came in 2015, when Jewish extremists set fire to the Church of the Multiplication, where it is said Jesus performed the miracle of feeding 5,000 people with two fish and five loaves.
A decade later, one memory from the arson trial has stuck with Schnabel: the attorney delivering a fiery courtroom argument in defense of the young Jews accused of terrorism.
That lawyer was Itamar Ben Gvir, now the minister of national security.
Narek Karapetyan explained the decision to take the mandates
Narek Karapetyan, who heads the electoral list of the opposition “Strong Armenia” bloc, announced that the political force will take the parliamentary mandates in order to combine the street struggle and the work in the National Assembly. He announced this on his page on social networks, referring to public criticism.
In his address, Karapetyan denied the claims that the opposition is going to the parliament for the sake of privileges. According to him, the parliamentary mandate is exclusively a tool of political struggle, which entails additional pressures and complications. The politician emphasized that the importance of the mandate for the opposition is only problems and struggles, and there is “nothing to enjoy”.
Karapetyan also referred to the calls not to recognize the legitimacy of the elections and to refuse mandates on that basis. He noted that the international institutions ignored the arrests of hundreds of supporters of the opposition headquarters before the vote. According to him, foreign forces are turning a blind eye to the processes taking place in Armenia due to geopolitical considerations, with the aim of turning the country into another state hostile to the great powers, turning it into a “second Ukraine”.
In his statement, the leader of the list sharply criticized the ruling “Civil Pact” party, accusing their representatives of being foreign agents. Karapetyan expressed his belief that in order to implement serious political changes in the country, a combination of street struggle and a large representation of the opposition within the parliament is necessary, which will allow to ensure the change of power in a legal way at the right time.
Let’s remind that earlier, on July 4, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia upheld the decision of the Central Electoral Commission, rejecting the applications of the opposition forces to declare the results of the elections invalid.
—
After “Strong Armenia”, the “Armenia” alliance also takes the mandates of the National Assembly
Following the results of the June 7 parliamentary elections and the decision of the Constitutional Court, the opposition “Armenia” bloc has officially announced its intention to take the mandates it received, describing the parliamentary presence as a necessary weapon of political struggle.
The official announcement of the alliance emphasizes that voluntarily giving up mandates will be seen as irresponsibility towards the state and the voters who voted for them. The political power does not consider the parliamentary status as a position or comfort, but considers it a legal and political tool for daily resistance and protection of citizens’ interests.
According to the announcement, the representation in the National Assembly will give an opportunity to raise public issues more effectively, offer concrete solutions, as well as strengthen ties with international and local actors. “Armenia” alliance assures that it will send an ideological and unbreakable political team to the parliament, which is ready to assume its share of responsibility in the front line of political resistance.
It is noteworthy that the day before, on July 6, Narek Karapetyan, the representative of the “Strong Armenia” alliance, also announced the decision to take the mandates.
Let us remind you that according to the final results of the June 7 elections, three political forces will operate in the newly elected National Assembly. the ruling “Civil Pact” party will have 64 seats, the “Strong Armenia” alliance will have 29 seats, and the “Armenia” alliance will have 12 seats.
—