RFE/RL – Georgian Sailors Survive Iranian Attack On Ship Off Iraqi Coast

March 12, 2026 12:02 CET
SEE VIDEO

All 23 Georgian crew members aboard a Malta-flagged tanker struck by Iran off the Iraqi coast have been rescued, a relative of one of the sailors told RFE/RL’s Georgian Service.

Two oil tankers sailing in Iraqi territorial waters were struck in the Persian Gulf early on March 12, with sailors describing a coordinated attack involving drones and explosive devices.

Iranian state television confirmed that Iranian forces had attacked the tankers, reporting that at least one vessel was hit by an Iranian unmanned vehicle from the water.

One of the targeted ships was the Malta-flagged tanker Zefyros, which included the 23 Georgian sailors, while the second vessel that was hit, Safesea Vishnu, was sailing under a Marshall Islands flag and was chartered by an Iraqi company, according to the Iraqi State Organization for Marketing of Oil (SOMO).

SEE ALSO:

Ariel Cohen: Iran’s Energy Pressure Campaign ‘Ultimately Unsustainable’

“I spoke with him around midnight and everything was fine,” Nincho Surmanidze, the wife of Georgian sailor Irakli Jashi, told RFE/RL. “Then he called me again around 2:30 a.m. and quickly said: ‘We’re all OK, everyone survived.'”

Later in the morning, she said, her husband told her a drone had struck their tanker, triggering a fire that heavily damaged the vessel.

“He said everything burned,” Surmanidze added.

According to Iraqi authorities, 38 sailors were rescued from the tankers targeted in the attack and were transported to an Iraqi port.

At least one sailor was killed, Iraqi officials said, though the victim’s identity and nationality have not been disclosed.

Surmanidze said her husband had been working aboard the vessel for about six months and had been scheduled to return to Georgia on March 10 before the ship was delayed due to the conflict in the Middle East.

“If there had been no war in the region, he would have already been home,” she said.

SEE ALSO:

US To Allow Sale Of Some Russian Oil To Ease Shortages Amid Iran War

The attack occurred amid rising tensions across the region as Iran retaliates for ongoing US and Israeli air strikes.

Much of Tehran’s campaign appears aimed at disrupting global energy markets, especially hitting targets around the Gulf, including vessels, raising security risks for commercial shipping routes that are vital to the oil and gas industries.

Some analysts say the reported use of drones, remotely detonated explosives, and unmanned vehicles in the water suggests a sophisticated maritime strike designed to damage tankers while limiting direct confrontation.

Officials at Georgia’s Maritime Transport Agency and the Foreign Ministry were not available to comment when contacted by RFE/RL’s Georgian Service, saying information about the incident would be released later.

  • RFE/RL’s Georgian Service

    RFE/RL’s Georgian Service is a trusted source of politically and financially independent journalism in a country where much of the media is aligned with the government or the opposition.

     SUBSCRIBE VIA RSS
  • Merhat Sharipzhan

    Merhat Sharipzhan is a senior correspondent for RFE/RL who focuses on developments in the former Soviet Union.




RFE/RL – Investigation Highlights Iran’s Growing Footprint In Georgia

March 13, 2026 00:49 CET
The Imam Reza Mosque in the Georgian city of Marneuli.

Georgia’s State Security Service has launched an investigation into claims that Iran is expanding its influence in the country through Georgian Shi’ite communities, growing concerns about Tehran’s religious and political outreach in the South Caucasus country.

The probe follows a report by the Hudson Institute, a Washington-based think tank, and public statements by opposition politicians alleging Iran has been building networks of influence in Georgia, particularly among ethnic Azerbaijani Shi’ite communities in the southeastern Kvemo Kartli region.

SEE ALSO:

Thousands Of Iranian Companies Operating In Georgia Amid Sanctions Evasion Concerns

It also comes at a time when Georgia’s foreign policy orientation has become increasingly contested. Once Washington’s closest ally in the South Caucasus, Georgia, under its current government, has increasingly distanced itself from the West while strengthening ties with Russia, China, and Iran.

Iran’s intent, according to the Hudson Institute report published March 4, is to “groom the next generation of Georgian Shi’ite leaders, foster loyalty to Iran’s political theology, and normalize anti-American narratives.”

Economic ties between Georgia and Iran have also drawn scrutiny.

Nearly 13,000 Iranian-linked companies are registered in Georgia, many associated with only a handful of addresses — a pattern analysts say raises concerns about possible sanctions evasion.

Some investigators say Iranian firms may be using Georgia as a transit point to bypass international restrictions, with certain companies reportedly linked to Iran’s armed forces.

Georgia’s State Security Service told RFE/RL the claims about Iran’s outreach contradict available evidence and said authorities are examining the motivations behind the accusations.

Speaking to journalists, Tbilisi Mayor Kakhi Kaladze — a top official in the ruling Georgian Dream party — accused former Defense Minister Tina Khidasheli of committing a “traitorous act” for recent statements on the issue.

Kaladze also lashed out at former MP Giorgi Kandelaki, a political activist and co-author of the Hudson Institute report titled “Georgia’s Iranian Turn: Tehran’s Rapid Expansion of Influence in a Once-Committed US Ally.”

The Hudson Institute said in a statement that it condemned the government’s investigation into the authors of the report, which it said should serve as a wake-up call for Georgian authorities.

SEE ALSO:

Once Washington’s Closest Caucasus Partner, Georgia Watches Vance Visit From The Outside

“This report should serve as a wake-up call — especially at a time when Iran serves as a destabilizing force in the region,” John Waters, the think tank’s president, said in a statement on March 9.

“Rather than investigating the authors of the report, Georgian authorities should be concerned by its findings, which rely overwhelmingly on publicly accessible information that the authorities should already be aware of,” he added.

Shi’ite activism in Georgia dates back to the late 1980s when Soviet borders opened and Muslim populations in the Soviet republics began reconnecting with religious institutions abroad, according to Aleksandre Kvakhadze, a researcher specializing in the Caucasus and terrorism at the Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies (GFSIS).

“Amid tightened religious policies in Azerbaijan, Georgia offered a much freer environment with fewer restrictions, allowing Shi’ite groups to extend their influence more widely,” she said.

Much of the focus of public debate in Georgia has centered on activities linked to Al-Mustafa International University, a global network of Shi’ite seminaries headquartered in the Iranian city of Qom.

Al Mustafa University in Georgia

The institution was sanctioned by the United States last year amid allegations that it recruited Afghan and Pakistani students to fight in the Syrian conflict.

The university operates in several Georgian cities with large Azerbaijani populations.

RFE/RL was unable to trace the full network of the university’s alumni in Georgia, though some former students are believed by analysts to work as mosque leaders, lecturers, or cultural activists.

“Among the Shi’a in Georgia, there is sympathy for Iran. It would not be objective to deny that,” Oktay Kazimov, a former teacher at Al-Mustafa, told RFE/RL.

The issue has taken on extra life with the launching of the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran.

Many Iranian Shi’a have reacted sharply to the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during the initial wave of air strikes on February 28.

Khamenei’s death prompted a group of demonstrators to gather in front of the Iranian Embassy in Tbilisi, holding images of the slain leader and chanting: “I am ready to carry out your order.”

Irakli Kobakhidze, head of the Georgian Dream government, who is known for his anti-Western statements, compared the gathering to ongoing pro-European demonstrations outside the Georgian parliament.

“A hundred people gather in front of the Parliament of Georgia and make statements against the Georgian state. All of this needs to be managed,” he said.

Public displays of pro-Iranian sentiment have also appeared in parts of Kvemo Kartli, a region south of Tbilisi bordering Azerbaijan and Armenia and home to much of Georgia’s ethnic Azerbaijani population.

“Iranians have long been present in Kvemo Kartli, but under the Georgian Dream their presence has grown and become more visible,” Georgian political analyst Giorgi Sanikadze told RFE/RL.

The pulse of Georgia’s Shi’ite community can often be taken at the Imam Reza Mosque in the city of Marneuli. The mosque is a major Shi’ite religious site and community hub for the local Azerbaijani population.

Orchestrating Violence

The mosque made headlines in February when it issued a statement accusing the United States and its Western allies of orchestrating violence across the Middle East. It blamed Washington and Israel for conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Gaza, Afghanistan, and Yemen, while describing those killed in recent protests in Iran as “rebels against the Islamic order.”

“I can also see Iranian influence increasing in Kvemo Kartli among Azerbaijanis, but it is not as high as some Georgian politicians and civil-society leaders claim. It is limited to a small group of people,” Rabil Ismail, a civic activist from Kvemo Kartli, told RFE/RL.

“At the same time, I see hate speech against Azerbaijanis increasing on social media. This is a sensitive issue and could harm peace among Georgia’s communities. As a community, we do not want any country — including Iran –interfering in Kvemo Kartli,” he added.

Recent security incidents have also drawn attention to possible Iranian-linked activities connected to Georgia.

On March 2, Greek police detained a 36-year-old Georgian citizen at Athens airport on suspicion of spying for Iran. While authorities have released few details, a Georgian media outlet reported that the suspect is an ethnic Azerbaijani from Georgia. RFE/RL’s Georgian Service could not verify the claim.

Experts also look back to last year when Georgian-born crime boss Polad Omarov was found guilty of participating in a 2022 plot to assassinate US-based Iranian journalist Masih Alinejad in New York.

RFE/RL’s Georgian Service has reported that Omarov is ethnic Azerbaijani.

  • Nastasia Arabuli

    Nastasia Arabuli is a correspondent for RFE/RL’s Georgian Service.

     SUBSCRIBE VIA RSS
  • Ulviyya Asadzade

    Ulviyya Asadzade works as a journalist in RFE/RL’s Central Newsroom. Prior to this role, she spent nearly two decades with RFE/RL’s Azerbaijani Service, where she reported extensively on corruption, human rights, and the geopolitics of the South Caucasus, Russia, Turkey, and Iran. In addition to her work with RFE/RL, Asadzade has contributed to Eurasianet.org, The Bulletin, and Caucasus Edition, covering regional politics and cross-border issues.

https://www.rferl.org/a/iran-georgia-azerbaijan-shia-us/33703933.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawQgkrRleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEetfCGQOIq4NmGq1kRB1ZDEIQ5QF5-7cviNlhXsenC3cWpK6Liu81wqCreJrE_aem_R8do6mhsl_QjL2MCNX_iJg

RFE/RL – Iran War Hampering Work On ‘Trump Route,’ Says Pashinian

March 12, 2026
Iran – A family gathers the remaining furniture from an apartment damaged by an airstrike, Tehran, March 12, 2026.

The continuing war between the United States and Israel and Iran will likely delay the planned opening of a U.S.-administered transit corridor for Azerbaijan through Armenia, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian said on Thursday.

“It is obvious that the TRIPP (Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity) is not a priority for the US administration today, at least, because we see what is happening and what they are busy with,” he told reporters. “Unfortunately, there is a high probability that it will affect [relevant] processes in terms of timelines because the [U.S.] government is focused on that issue.”

The TRIPP is due to connect Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave through Armenia’s strategic Syunik region bordering Iran. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan released the first major details of the TRIPP after meeting in Washington on January 13.

A joint U.S.-Armenian “implementation framework” confirmed that a special company controlled by the U.S. government will build a railway, a road, energy supply lines and other infrastructure along Armenia’s border with Iran and manage them for at least 49 years. Pashinian and Mirzoyan said late last year that work on that infrastructure will start this summer.

In the months leading up to the ongoing war, Iranian officials, notably a top aide to the late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, spoke out against the transit arrangement. They feared that it could undermine Armenian control of the border and lead to U.S. security presence there. Yerevan sought to allay their concerns. Some observers believe that Tehran will now be even more opposed to the TRIPP even if the war is stopped in the coming days or weeks.

Iran is a major trading partner of Armenia and one of the landlocked country’s two conduits to the outside world. Although the Armenian-Iranian border has remained largely open since the start of the U.S.-Israeli air strikes on the Islamic Republic on February 28, the conflict has reportedly led to a serious fall in cargo traffic between the two states.

Pashinian Admits Forcing Armenian Genocide Museum Head To Resign

March 12, 2026
Armenia – U.S. Vice President JD Vance and his wife Usha are accompanied by Edita Gzoyan (left), director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute in Yerevan, as they visit it on February 10, 2026

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian on Thursday acknowledged that he forced the director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute (AGMI) to resign because of what she told and gave U.S. Vice President JD Vance during his recent visit to Yerevan.

The director, Edita Gzoyan, gifted Vance five books after he and his wife Usha laid flowers on February 10 at a memorial to the victims of the 1915 genocide, which is part of the AGMI. Gzoyan also escorted them to other parts of the complex, including cross-stones placed in memory of Armenians killed in 1988-1990 pogroms in Azerbaijan. According to an AGMI press release, she emphasized “the connection between those events and the Armenian Genocide” in Ottoman Turkey.

Gzoyan tendered her resignation earlier this month. Pashinian confirmed that she did so “on my instructions.”

“Yes, I considered [the gift to Vance] an action contrary to the foreign policy pursued by the government, I considered it a provocative action and asked her to write a resignation letter,” he told journalists.

“When the country’s prime minister says there is no Karabakh movement, what does it mean to present a book on the Artsakh issue to a foreign guest? … Foreign policy in Armenia is conducted by the government of Armenia, and any Armenian government official who says anything that contradicts the government’s foreign policy should be fired,” said Pashinian.

Armenia – People march to the Armenian Genocide Memorial in Yerevan, April 24, 2024.

Gzoyan has still not publicly commented on her resignation which upset the AGMI staff. The AGMI press release said that the books handed by her to Vance related to “the Armenian Genocide and the Artsakh issue.”

AGMI sources told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service that Gzoyan for years gave the same books and organized the same tours for all foreign dignitaries visiting the Tsitsernakaberd memorial. Pashinian’s protocol service did not give her any instructions ahead of Vance’s visit, according to them. Also, the AGMI has a division on “research on the repression of Armenians in the Armenian-populated regions of Artsakh, Nakhichevan and Azerbaijan.”

The director of the genocide memorial and its research wing is appointed by its board of trustees, rather tan the prime minister or even the Armenian Ministry of Education, Culture and Youth Affairs. Pashinian’s intervention may therefore be portrayed by his critics as abuse of power.

The board’s chairman, French-Armenian genocide scholar Raymond Kevorkian, and several members resigned last week. They included Hranush Kharatian, a prominent historian and sociologist. Kharatian criticized Pashinian’s remarks as a threat to academic freedom in Armenia when she spoke with RFE/RL’s Armenian Service later on Thursday.

“It looks like our prime minister … wants to decide by himself the scope of academic freedoms and what research centers can say,” she said.

Pashinian promptly replaced Kharatian and other board members on March 6. He is expected to install one of his former aides, Hrachya Tashchian, as the new AGMI director on Friday.

Tashchian already occupied Gzoyan’s office on Thursday. He denied that the prime minister is exerting pressure on the AGMI and its scholars.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev receive a Zayed Award for Human Fraternity, February 4, 2025.

Pashinian has repeatedly declared that the Karabakh issue is closed for his administration. He recognized Azerbaijani sovereignty over Karabakh even before Baku restored control over the region following the September 2023 military offensive that forced its entire population to flee to Armenia. In a speech at the European Parliament on Wednesday, Pashinian again stated that the Karabakh Armenians should forget about returning to their homeland.

Pashinian has also offered far-reaching concessions to Turkey, which provided Azerbaijan with decisive military support during the 2020 war with Armenia. In particular, he declared last year that Armenians should “understand what happened” in 1915 and what prompted the subsequent campaign for international recognition of the Armenian genocide in Ottoman Turkey. Armenian historians, opposition figures and retired diplomats expressed outrage at the remarks, saying that Pashinian cast doubt on the fact of the genocide officially recognized by over three dozen countries, including the United Staes.

RFE/RL – Armenian Officials To Get More Bonuses Ahead Of Elections

March 12, 2026
Armenia – Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian chairs a cabinet meeting in Yerevan, June 12, 2025.

The Armenian government decided on Thursday to spend 4.6 billion drams ($12.2 million) in fresh bonuses that will be paid to its senior officials and other government employees before the parliamentary elections slated for June 7.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s cabinet said that they will be rewarded for their improved performance, rather than the elections. But it did not specify any criteria used for evaluating their work.

Armenian opposition leaders are bound to describe the latest payments as an attempt to buy votes. They already accused Pashinian of seeking to bribe voters when the latter unexpectedly announced late last month an imminent rise in pensions.

The fresh bonuses will be allocated from the government’s budgetary Reserve Fund designed for emergency spending. Their aggregate amount represents a sizable increase from 3.6 billion drams provided for the same purpose last year.

Details of the previous bonuses paid to senior staff and other employees of 16 government agencies were exposed by Armenian media only in January, causing outrage among many citizens. It emerged that the ministers, their deputies and department heads received sums comparable to their annual incomes, ordinary civil servants were rewarded with less than one month’s worth of their much smaller salaries. It is not yet clear whether the government will maintain this huge disparity.

Justice Minister Srbuhi Galian was the only senior official to have disclosed the size of her post-tax bonus: about 7 million drams ($18,400). Pashinian defended these lavish payments on January 15, saying that they will make those officials less prone to corruption. He gave a similar reason for his government’s latest decision.

“No matter how much we are criticized, with this mechanism, we are taking an important step on the path to the further development of our state,” he said.

Varuzhan Hoktanian, a veteran activist affiliated with Armenia’s leading anti-graft watchdog, again questioned on Thursday the official rationale for the bonuses, pointing to a lack of transparency in their distribution.

“In addition to high salaries which are a necessary condition for reducing corruption, we should also look at the existence of transparency, accountability, and oversight mechanisms,” Hoktanian told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “I doubt that this exists. But if it does, we should at least see in a transparent way what exactly the rewards are for.”

The leadership of the Armenian parliament controlled by Pashinian’s Civil Contract party also caused outrage on social media in December when it confirmed spending at least 545 million drams ($1.4 million) on yearend bonuses to its members and staffers. Each of the 107 parliament deputies received 3 million drams ($7,850).

The net salary of a rank-and-file deputy is roughly 600,000 drams ($1,550) per month. Armenia’s official average monthly wage currently stands at almost 309,000 drams ($810). Most working-age Armenians, including schoolteachers and other public sector employees, earn less than that.

Armenia-EU relations enter completely new phase – minister

Armenia20:08, 12 March 2026
Read the article in: ArabicՀայերենRussian

Relations between Armenia and the European Union have entered a completely new stage in terms of strategic partnership, Interior Minister Arpine Sargsyan said.

“The visa liberalization process is not only about facilitating travel from a visa perspective; it is also a very important strategic approach for us to continue and strengthen the reform agenda that the Republic of Armenia has currently adopted in terms of migration strategy, integrated border management, human rights protection and other areas,” the minister said.

Sargsyan reaffirmed the commitment of the Armenian government to fully implement each point included in the action plan within the framework of the visa liberalization dialogue.

She assured that Armenia is implementing the entire process through an institutional mechanism. A number of mechanisms have been created so that the action plan does not remain a plan of actions determined by a single person.

“For us, visa liberalization is about people. It is about empowering people and establishing a new level of cultural and social ties and people-to-people contacts. We have already made progress in various areas, both within the framework of the visa liberalization dialogue and beyond, in terms of Armenia-EU relations.”

“We note that Armenia-EU relations have moved to a completely new stage in terms of strategic partnership. I am confident that the topic of visa liberalization will also allow us to expand our partnership and achieve new results in bilateral relations, including for our citizens,” Sargsyan said.

The minister thanked EU partners for the programmatic and financial support provided.

Read the article in: ArabicՀայերենRussian

Published by Armenpress, original at 

President Khachaturyan meets representatives of Armenian community in Chile

President15:49, 12 March 2026
Read the article in: English

Armenian President Vahagn Khachaturyan met with representatives of the Armenian community in Chile during his visit to the South American country.

Khachaturyan visited Chile for the inauguration of President-elect José Antonio Kast.

During the meeting with the local Armenian community, President Khachaturyan provided details on developments in Armenia and the region, as well as ongoing reforms in the country, the President’s Office said in a readout. 

He also answered questions from attendees, addressing the priorities and challenges of Armenia’s domestic and foreign policy, as well as the framework for establishing peace and developing relations with neighboring countries.

Read the article in: English

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Armenian President attends inauguration of Chile’s José Antonio Kast

President16:08, 12 March 2026
Read the article in: العربيةEspañolՀայերենRussian

President of Armenia, Vahagn Khachaturyan, participated in the inauguration of Chile’s President-elect, José Antonio Kast.

Khachaturyan is visiting Chile from March 10 to 12. 

The President’s Office released photos from the ceremony.

During the visit, Khachaturyan also met with representatives of the Armenian community in Chile.

He met with other world leaders attending an official reception prior to the inauguration.

Read the article in: العربيةEspañolՀայերենRussian

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Verelq: Robert Kocharyan’s team is preparing a big event

“Hraparak” newspaper writes:


“The team of the second president of the Republic of Armenia, Robert Kocharyan, is preparing a big event, which will probably take place on March 16, at the sports concert complex named after Karen Demirchyan. On that day, it will be announced about the alliance led by Kocharyan, which will participate in the national elections on June 7.


There will be 2 forces in the alliance: the Armenian Revolutionary Alliance and the right-centered party of Sevak Khachatryan, candidate for the mayor of Etchmiadzin. Although the passing threshold for alliances was raised before this election from 7 to 8 percent, the second president’s team has no doubts that they will overcome the threshold, one more thing.


Although the government and its propaganda machine insist on the opposite. By the way, the first three of the alliance are 21 years old. Robert Kocharyan, Ishkhan Saghatelyan, Anna Grigoryan: Last time, the fourth number was Vahe Hakobyan, the chairman of the “Reviving Armenia” party, this time it will probably be Sevak Khachatryan.

Pashinyan used the European podium to label his opponents

It is difficult to perceive Nikol Pashinyan’s speech in the European Parliament as a responsible speech of the head of a sovereign state. It was more reminiscent of an attempt at domestic political reprisal, transferred to an international prestigious platform.


Instead of representing Armenia’s state interests, security challenges and regional realities, Pashinyan used the European podium to label his own opponents.


Pashinyan presented the representatives of the Armenian Apostolic Church and opponents of the government as a “party of war”, trying to connect them with external forces and attribute to them a willingness to sacrifice Armenia’s independence. In reality, this was not a political assessment, but a political labeling aimed at discrediting one’s opponents before the international audience.


When the head of the country presents a segment of his own society as a dangerous force or a tool of external influence from an internationally prestigious podium, he actually transfers the internal political conflict of his country to an external platform. Such a step does not strengthen the state, but shows the political weakness and mistrust of the government towards its own society.


Another goal was also evident in Pashinyan’s speech. He tried to present the political field of Armenia as a geopolitical confrontation, contrasting the government with the allegedly “pro-Russian war party”. This narrative has long been used in the internal political struggle, but when it is heard from the European podium, it acquires a completely different meaning. It is more reminiscent of a report to Western sponsors than a speech by the head of a sovereign state.


In fact, Pashinyan was trying to convince the European audience that there is a political opposition in Armenia that needs to be neutralized. In other words, the internal political struggle of Armenia is presented as a geopolitical struggle, where the opponents of the government are declared “supporters of war” or “agents of the influence of external forces”. This is a dangerous and irresponsible policy that not only deepens public polarization, but also involves foreign forces in Armenia’s internal political conflict.


When the head of the country discredits his opponents and even one of the fundamental national institutions, the church, from the international podium, it is not a sign of a strong state, but a clear manifestation of the political crisis of the government. Such behavior shows that Pashinyan is trying to get legitimacy, “green light” from Western centers to carry out repressions inside Armenia.


June 7 becomes not only another election day, but a public verdict on the policy, as a result of which Armenia is gradually losing its independence and political subjectivity in international relations. On that day, the citizens will actually decide whether Armenia will continue to move along the path of power subjected to the calculations of external centers, or whether it will choose the path of sovereign, dignified and independent state development.


Political scientist Suren Surenyants