Over 45 Members of Congress Co-Sign ANCA-Backed Letter Advancing Pro-Armenian

Bipartisan Letter to House Appropriations Subcommittee Calls for Armenia Security Aid, Artsakh Refugee Relief, Azerbaijan Accountability, and TRIPP Oversight

WASHINGTON– The Armenian National Committee of America welcomed a Congressional Armenian Caucus letter — backed by over 45 Members of the House of Representatives — urging the House Appropriations Subcommittee on National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs to include critical pro-Armenia/Artsakh provisions in the Fiscal Year 2027 Appropriations Bill.

The letter, addressed to Subcommittee Chairman Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) and Ranking Member Lois Frankel (D-FL), calls for expanded U.S.-Armenia security cooperation, $100 million in humanitarian assistance for Armenians forcibly displaced from Artsakh, a prohibition on U.S. military aid to Azerbaijan, Global Magnitsky Act sanctions accountability measures, and meaningful Congressional oversight of the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP) framework.

“Over forty-five members of Congress have put their names behind a clear, principled message: the United States must stand with Armenia, hold Azerbaijan accountable, and deliver justice for the Armenians of Artsakh,” stated Aram Hamparian, ANCA Executive Director. “This letter — secured through the hard work of Armenian Americans mobilizing across the country — gives the Appropriations Subcommittee a bipartisan mandate to act. The FY27 appropriations process is one of the most powerful tools Congress has, and this Caucus letter puts that power to work for our Armenian American priorities.”

Congressional Armenian Caucus Founding Co-Chair Frank Pallone (D-NJ) led the letter and was joined by Representatives Gabe Amo (D-RI), Jake Auchincloss (D-MA), Nanette Diaz Barragan (D-CA), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), Don Beyer (D-VA), Nikki Budzinski (D-IL), Salud Carbajal (D-CA), Judy Chu (D-CA), Jim Costa (D-CA), Jasmine Crockett (D-TX), Danny Davis (D-IL), Valerie Foushee (D-NC), Laura Friedman (D-CA), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), Steven Horsford (D-NV), Jared Huffman (D-CA), Jonathan Jackson (D-IL), Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), John Larson (D-CT), George Latimer (D-NY), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Seth Magaziner (D-RI), Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), James McGovern (D-MA), Rob Menendez (D-NJ), Dave Min (D-CA), Kevin Mullin (D-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Chris Pappas (D-NH), Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Luz Rivas (D-CA), Linda Sanchez (D-CA), Janice Schakowsky (D-IL), Brad Schneider (D-IL), Brad Sherman (D-CA), Darren Soto (D-FL), Tom Suozzi (D-NY), Eric Swalwell (D-CA), Dina Titus (D-NV), Paul Tonko (D-NY), Lori Trahan (D-MA), and Nydia Velazquez (D-NY).

Armenian Security Assistance
The letter calls for $20 million in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) and $10 million in International Military Education and Training (IMET), warning that additional assistance “would play a critical role in strengthening Armenia’s defensive capabilities and establishing a deterrent against Azerbaijan’s unabated expansionism and threats of aggression and use of force.” The Caucus further cautioned that “the Aliyev regime will seek to take advantage of Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine and turmoil across the Middle East to press its military advantage against Armenia during this critical stage in negotiations.”

Humanitarian Relief for Displaced Armenians of Artsakh
The letter requests $100 million in AEECA Humanitarian Account funding, documenting that Azerbaijan’s 2023 invasion resulted in “the genocidal ethnic cleansing of the region’s entire indigenous Armenian population” following “a 10-month siege on the region, which saw Azerbaijan deliberately deprive over 120,000 ethnic Armenians access to food, fuel, medicine and other essential goods.” The Caucus warned that existing assistance “has been wholly insufficient to meet these families’ outstanding needs” and that Azerbaijan’s “continued refusal to guarantee the safe and secure return of Armenians to their homes, as required under international law, remains an ongoing obstacle to lasting peace in the region.”

Accountability for Azerbaijan and Release of Armenian Hostages
The letter calls for a full prohibition on U.S. military aid to Azerbaijan, documenting that “despite ongoing peace talks, Azerbaijan continues to engage in conduct that contradicts its stated commitment to peace” — including sentencing 16 Armenian prisoners of war to prison terms ranging from 15 years to life “following lengthy sham trials, during which Armenian detainees were subject to abuse and torture, and deprived of their fundamental legal rights.” The Caucus stated plainly: “President Aliyev has repeatedly demonstrated that he is not an honest broker for peace in the region, and the U.S. must not reward his regime with security assistance of any kind.” The letter also calls for a Global Magnitsky Act sanctions review targeting Azerbaijani officials responsible for human rights abuses.

TRIPP Oversight
On the TRIPP corridor framework, the letter acknowledges the agreement “raises concerns regarding Armenia’s sovereignty and ownership rights over its sovereign territory” and flags “unanswered questions regarding the security of the route, especially assurances that the route will not be used to facilitate military transportation or arms sales between Turkey and Azerbaijan, which would undermine Armenia’s security interests.” The Caucus also expressed concern over “Azerbaijan’s solicitation of foreign investment to engage in the demolition, reconstruction and redevelopment of formerly Armenian-populated areas,” calling for State and Commerce Department reporting on whether U.S.-based entities operating in Azerbaijan have “materially aided Azerbaijan’s ongoing human rights violations.”

The ANCA mobilized Armenian Americans nationwide through its action alert to contact their Representatives ahead of the co-signature deadline. Armenian Americans can continue to engage their Representatives and track legislative developments.

https://asbarez.com/over-45-members-of-congress-co-sign-anca-backed-letter-advancing-pro-armenian-foreign-aid-priorities/?fbclid=IwY2xjawQgjsNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEe9gOBbE79WdRq4I7Ir_kFZ2AgqcVV4qUysQsrrooDsrVTFFn7SG9oaq_827M_aem_xj9fZxHMkmoEwREVfVfYog


‘Vance Syndrome’ and the Uncertain Future of Armenia’s Genocide Museum-Instit

Vice-President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha Vance at the Dzidzernagapert Armenian Genocide Monument on Feb. 10


BY HAYK MARTIROSYAN

The rumors about the forced “resignation” of Dr. Edita Gzoyan, the director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, have been confirmed. It’s now possible to discuss it openly. Claiming there is a significant amount of injustice and humiliation involved would be an understatement. Under such circumstances, even mentioning scientific impartiality and academic freedom seems pointless.

I worked at AGMI intermittently from 2006 to 2014. And during the last eight years, have been a researcher at the Lepsius House in Potsdam (providing archival materials and literature, organizing joint initiatives, etc.), while continuing to cooperate with the Museum-Institute regularly. I am currently also a member of the editorial board of the AGMI journal.

Dr. Gzoyan was elected director of AGMI two years ago. It is clear these past two years have been the most productive in AGMI’s history across numerous fields: there has been an unprecedented number of scholarly articles published in international and prestigious journals; after persistent efforts, the International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies was included last year in the highly sought-after Scopus list of academic journals (the only one from Armenia); international conferences and events were organized with global partners; an audio-guide system was introduced and made available in multiple languages; the contributions of all staff members—not just a select few—were recognized and encouraged; connections with Diasporan Armenian scholars were strengthened, and their contributions to AGMI’s efforts increased. It is impossible to list all the accomplishments. Why remove Gzoyan? Where did she fail?

Consider the scholar’s perspective: review the works and articles published by Gzoyan from the prior two years, note those in impactful international journals. How many people in our field can you name in Armenia who have more publications? Consider the active collaboration with Diasporan scholars. Take as clear proof of disagreement with this decision the fact that two Diasporan scholars on the Board of Trustees—Raymond Kevorkian and Stephan Astourian—have both left the board (as well as Vasken Yacoubian, President of the AGBU Armenia office), along with two other scholars from Armenia (Hranush Kharatyan and Harutyun Marutyan).

Look at the management aspect: the best evidence is the joint letter-appeal from all 74 AGMI employees (although it was clear that it would not be accepted) asking to prevent the change of director. As someone who spent many years at AGMI and knows its inner workings well, I assure you that such unity and positive atmosphere have never existed there before—I, of all people, know that.

Apparently, the claims are correct that her dismissal relates to J.D. Vance’s visit and the director’s conversation about Artsakh, which is unacceptable by the authorities. Moreover, judging from the videos, she even had the “audacity” to accompany Vance to the khachkars commemorating the massacres of Armenians in Azerbaijan and tell him about them, presenting him with an informative book. (Here I would gladly recount an attempt to “convince” an influential professor in Leipzig on precisely this topic in a much more complicated situation, and the respected professor’s “beautiful” and “accessible” reply—but I cannot make it public.)

Personally, I believe Vance’s visit was simply the final straw. Because, to her credit, Gzoyan has always spoken out about the ethnic cleansing in Artsakh. A large amount of work has been done for that cause. She has also raised other topics unacceptable for the “constructive” authorities within the context of the Armenian Genocide (for example, topics about Nemesis, Tehlirian Trial, etc.). The reason for Gzoyan dismissal is certainly not the construction project happening at the memorial complex, as is being presented. The construction is primarily under the ministry’s control. If that were the reason, the director would have been dismissed last year when the controversy surrounding the construction reached its peak. If construction had truly been the issue, they could have appointed an “extraordinary and plenipotentiary foreman” until the work was completed. Or a rhetorical question arises: after the construction is finished, will the future director with construction expertise leave the position?

Gzoyan can leave with her head held high. Unfortunately, the enormous sense of hurt, disappointment, and injustice will hardly diminish because of that.

Alas—long live “academic freedom,” long live “effective” governance, long live the “appreciation” of Diasporan Armenian scholars, long live the “recognition” of the efforts to internationalize AGMI’s work and Armenian scholarship, long live your talent for “taking into account” the opinion of AGMI employees, and finally, long live “justice.”

Now appoint a “professional” whose only qualification will be “flexibility” and adaptability. Otherwise, the “Vance syndrome” tends to recur.

Dr. Hayk Martirosyan served, with some interruptions, as a research fellow at the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute from 2006 to 2014. Since 2017, he has been a research associate at the Lepsiushaus in Potsdam. Martirosyan studied Oriental and Turkic studies at Yerevan State University and earned his doctorate from the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia. His research focuses on the history of missionary activity in the Ottoman Empire, missionary biographies, and the history of aid organizations and rescue efforts for Armenians. He is the author of two monographs and more than two dozen scholarly articles.




Kessab Educational Association of Los Angeles Hosts Dr. Razmig Panossian

Dr. Razmig Panossian is greeted by attendees


The Kessab Educational Association of Los Angeles hosted a special gathering on March 6 to welcome one of its beloved sons, Dr. Razmig Panossian, who met with fellow Kessabtsis during his visit to Los Angeles. Community members gathered for an evening of conversation focused on Armenian language, identity and the future of Diaspora communities.

Dr. Panossian, who works with the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation in Portugal, spoke about the foundation’s work supporting Armenian cultural and educational initiatives across the Diaspora. He emphasized that language remains one of the most important pillars of Armenian identity and encouraged families to keep Armenian present in everyday life by speaking it regularly at home.

He noted that while Eastern and Western Armenian serve as the principal forms used throughout, regional dialects such as Kessaberen carry deep historical and cultural value. Preserving these dialects, he explained, helps maintain the unique character and traditions of communities like Kessab. He also encouraged parents not to worry about correcting children between dialects, but rather to prioritize speaking Armenian and creating an environment where the language continues naturally.

Dr. Panossian also highlighted educational initiatives that support Armenian language learning, including the Zarmanazan Western Armenian summer program, an immersive program that brings together youth, educators and participants from Armenian communities around the world. Through creative activities, collaborative learning and teacher training, the program creates a dynamic environment where Western Armenian is actively used while strengthening connections among participants and helping develop the next generation of Armenian language educators.

He concluded by noting that strong Armenian communities are built through education, cultural engagement and the continued effort to preserve language and heritage across generations.

The evening provided an opportunity for Kessabtsis to reconnect with their roots and reaffirm their shared commitment to sustaining Armenian culture within the Diaspora.

The Kessab Educational Association of Los Angeles promotes education, cultural preservation and community engagement among Kessabtsis and the broader Armenian Diaspora through programs and initiatives that strengthen Armenian identity and heritage.

Asbarez: ‘It is Obvious TRIPP is Not a Priority for US Today,’ Pashinyan Lame

Armenia’s border with Iran in the Syunik Province


YEREVAN (Azatutyun.am)—The continuing war between the United States and Israel and Iran will likely delay the planned opening of a U.S.-administered transit corridor for Azerbaijan through Armenia, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said on Thursday.

“It is obvious that the TRIPP (Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity) is not a priority for the US administration today, at least, because we see what is happening and what they are busy with,” he told reporters. “Unfortunately, there is a high probability that it will affect [relevant] processes in terms of timelines because the [U.S.] government is focused on that issue.”

The TRIPP is due to connect Azerbaijan to Nakhichevan through Armenia’s strategic Syunik region bordering Iran. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan released the first major details of the TRIPP after meeting in Washington on January 13.

A joint U.S.-Armenian “implementation framework” confirmed that a special company controlled by the U.S. government will build a railway, a road, energy supply lines and other infrastructure along Armenia’s border with Iran and manage them for at least 49 years. Pashinyan and Mirzoyan said late last year that work on that infrastructure will start this summer.

In the months leading up to the ongoing war, Iranian officials, notably a top aide to the late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, spoke out against the transit arrangement. They feared that it could undermine Armenian control of the border and lead to U.S. security presence there. Yerevan sought to allay their concerns. Some observers believe that Tehran will now be even more opposed to the TRIPP even if the war is stopped in the coming days or weeks.

Iran is a major trading partner of Armenia and one of the landlocked country’s two conduits to the outside world. Although the Armenian-Iranian border has remained largely open since the start of the U.S.-Israeli air strikes on the Islamic Republic on February 28, the conflict has reportedly led to a serious fall in cargo traffic between the two states.

168: Help. Pashinyan is losing power

March: 12, 2026

Disgust. This is the only feeling that any RA citizen, regardless of political preferences, can have after listening to Nikol Pashinyan’s speech in the European Parliament yesterday.

In that speech, he condensed all his admiration and gratitude towards Azerbaijan, its president, while at the same time combining it with hatred towards everything Armenian.

From the podium of the European Parliament, Nikol Pashinyan voiced the dirtiest narratives of his intra-Armenian propaganda, about the Armenian Apostolic Church, high-ranking clergymen, and all those fighting against his anti-national policy.

Perhaps only due to the lack of confidence in the translation, he did not use the expressions “to dump”, “plaster on the walls”, “to throw something else”, in a substantive sense repeating the same bile with which he has been poisoning the Armenian society for the last two years.

Read also

  • Karen Demirchyan said, “That road will pass only over your corpse”… This plan of Pashinyan was proposed by Heydar Aliyev. The USA will not allow the formation of a new Ottoman Empire. Vardan Hakobyan
  • Could it be a war, I don’t know, there are victims and wounded, you don’t say, are you sparing me? Nikol Pashinyan
  • SAMVEL KARAPETIAN, SITTING AT HOME, WINS YOU. WHY ARE YOU COMING TO MUNNAT, DID YOU GIVE 600 MILLION OUT OF YOUR FATHER’S POCKET?  EDGAR GAZARYAN

At the same time, from the high European podium, he stated several times in different wordings that Armenia owes its existence today to… Azerbaijan.

The entire causality of Pashinyan’s speech was built on the fetishization of false “peace”, so that if the border delimitation process with Azerbaijan had not started two years ago, Armenia would not exist today and would instead be some territory under foreign rule. The Europeans, of course, applauded Pashinyan, not publicly showing their perception that, having saved Armenia from imaginary “foreign rule”, Pashinyan is no longer secretly handing it over to Azerbaijani-Turkish rule.

The assessment that Nikol Pashinyan has not been able to get rid of the mold of an eccentric oppositionist, even after being in power for 8 years, was once again confirmed yesterday in the hall of the European Parliament with all its misery.

In general, protesting against the political actors of one’s own country, requesting and begging for external support has been characteristic of the oppositions of different times, which, acting in European forums, have tried, often justly, to overcome the seemingly unsolvable problems with domestic instruments. Pashinyan also broke that unwritten law by aligning himself with President Sandu of Moldova and other figures with a similar political pedigree who are ready to do anything for the sake of maintaining power. Everything without exception.

What happened in the hall of the European Parliament, with all its unpleasantness, testifies to a positive reality. According to everything, Pashinyan is seriously aware of the danger of losing power and, fearing its consequences, is begging for help from the Europeans. Pashinyan hinted to Aliyev that if he too supports him in maintaining the power, he can add the phrase “long live the Republic of Azerbaijan” to the list of chants at the end of his speech.

Harutyun Avetisyan




To talk about Artsakh, on my instructions, the director of the Genocide Museum, Az

March: 12, 2026

Nikol Pashinyan confirmed that the director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, Edita Gzoyan, was removed from her position on his instructions.

“When the country’s prime minister says that there is no Karabakh movement, what does it mean to present a book on the subject of the “Artsakh issue” to a foreign guest? How many people can conduct foreign policy in this country?

The government conducts foreign policy in this country, and the government official of Armenia who says something contrary to Armenia’s foreign policy should be fired, what is the issue there? Are we a state or a self-made group?” said Pashinyan.

According to him, he considered the book dedicated to US Vice President James David Vance during his visit to the museum a provocative act and urged Gzoyan to write an application for his release.

“We are ready to ensure the connection of Azerbaijan through Ijevan-Gazakh and also through Kornidzor-Yerask.

March: 12, 2026

Nikol Pashinyan said in a briefing with journalists after the Cabinet session today that they did not talk about relative stability with the President of Azerbaijan, the President of Azerbaijan did not talk about it either.

“I spoke about peace, as far as I know, the president of Azerbaijan also spoke about peace. Relative stability is one thing, peace is another.

As for the possibility of signing a peace agreement, as I had occasion to say, quiet, calm, quiet diplomatic work is being done in that direction. But I have no doubt that this agreement will be signed, will it be signed now, in April, May or September, is the second issue, but it will be signed.

Now it is very clear that the positions of Azerbaijan and Armenia coincide, that peace has been established even though the peace agreement has not been signed,” said Nikol Pashinyan.

Read also

  • The Geopolitical Implications of Tower Pop, Performed by a Tuxedo Orangutan
  • Is the non-reserve role of the army a message of war? The difference between the political perceptions of Aliyev, Erdogan and Pashinyan
  • “2019 he shouted: “Artsakh is Armenia, and that’s it.” Why, if he can, let him answer all the “whys”, we will give our answers too”. Priest Sargis Sargsyan

According to him, at the moment they are talking about the impossibility of reversing the peace, it is in this sense that the internal political processes in both Armenia and Azerbaijan are important.

“There are forces in Armenia, I guess there are also in Azerbaijan, who are not so satisfied with the peace and will try to reverse the peace. We, the citizens of RA, must stand up for the established peace and make it irreversible,” added Nikol Pashinyan.

As for the unblocking of communications, Nikol Pashinyan said that they are working, actively moving forward, stressing that he understands that there is a perception in both Turkey and Azerbaijan that Armenia can try to delay the process.

“Why should we try to delay, on the contrary, we want that problem to be solved in minutes, because it is a fundamentally important issue from the point of view of realizing the architecture we imagine for today and the future.”

We are ready to ensure the connection of the Western regions of Azerbaijan and the autonomous republic of Nakhichevan from Kornidzor with Yeraskh. Why are we making this proposal, because now we actually use the railway of Azerbaijan, we don’t want our use to be one-sided. We want us to take our step step by step accordingly.

Once we offered the Turkey-Azerbaijan connection, now we offer the connection from Kornidzor to Yerashosv, especially since there are problems with that connection in the south due to the events taking place in Iran. There is a need for a little repair in the rear part, but even without repairs the car can still come and go today. Moreover, if it is considered convenient, we can provide the connection through the Ijevan-Gazakh section as well,” emphasized Nikol Pashinyan.

Details in the video of 168.am




“Giving a ceremonial gift on the issue of Artsakh is a political provocation, that’s enough

March: 12, 2026

Today, in a conversation with journalists after the regular session of the Government, Nikol Pashinyan confirmed that Edita Gzoyan, the former director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, has written an application for dismissal on her own instructions, because she dared to discuss the Artsakh problem during the visit of the US Vice President to Tsitsernakaberd and presented her with books on the subject.

“I said very clearly: there cannot be two foreign policies in the state, people can say: I am from Artsakh, I am from Van, I am from Mush, I am from Moscow, I am from Minvodi, what does that have to do with the topic I mentioned, a person can say whatever he wants. Here we are talking about the public official and the distribution of roles and political assessment,” Nikol Pashinyan said.

Continuing, Nikol Pashinyan made a sharp transition to the church again, saying that from the altar of the church they say “bless the Republic of Artsakh”, and here he is not giving a legal, but a political assessment.

“I say that Kutrich Nersisyan took over the leadership of the war party in RA. During church liturgies, the word “peace” is used more than 40 times, and 4-5 times it is emphasized: Lord God, give peace to the world. Here we are also talking about service of a spiritual nature. This is another example that these people have nothing to do with spiritual service at all.

Read also

  • The Geopolitical Implications of Tower Pop, Performed by a Tuxedo Orangutan
  • Is the non-reserve role of the army a message of war? The difference between the political perceptions of Aliyev, Erdogan and Pashinyan
  • “2019 he shouted: “Artsakh is Armenia, and that’s it.” Why, if he can, let him answer all the “whys”, we will give our answers too”. Priest Sargis Sargsyan

Giving a ceremonial gift on the subject of the Artsakh problem is a political provocation, there can be no such thing, that is, there is something to give a gift, are we not able to give it, are we afraid, should we give it through another official?

Listen, there is a state, a protocol, I say again: it is enough to treat our country as a self-sufficient group. I cannot allow such a thing,” emphasized Nikol Pashinyan.

Details in the video of 168.am




Having a different opinion of the church from the Prime Minister does not give the Prime Minister the right to v

March: 12, 2026

The International Court of Democracy in Armenia (IODA), which monitors democracy, made preliminary assessments today.

“Armenia. the targeting of political opponents, the abuse of judicial and security structures before the June parliamentary elections, cause concerns,” the international initiative recorded.

168amToday, the members of the initiative were interested: yesterday in the European Parliament, Pashinyan accused the church and the clergy of being against peace, as well as being under foreign influence, how do they view these accusations?

In response, Kenneth Roth first expressed his position and specifically noted: “We are not here to stand for or against in these elections. we are not for or against any candidate, nor do we have any position on the political issues facing this country.

Read also

  • The Geopolitical Implications of Tower Pop, Performed by a Tuxedo Orangutan
  • Is the non-reserve role of the army a message of war? The difference between the political perceptions of Aliyev, Erdogan and Pashinyan
  • “2019 he shouted: “Artsakh is Armenia, and that’s it.” Why, if he can, let him answer all the “whys”, we will give our answers too”. Priest Sargis Sargsyan

We know very well that questions are being raised about what should be Armenia’s relations with Azerbaijan, Turkey, Russia, Iran, the West, we do not take a position on those issues, and we will not appreciate the church’s comments on this matter, because the church has every right to take a certain position, to be for or against the actions of the government. that is his right, that is what democracy is about.

We are here to say that the fact that the church has a different position from the prime minister does not give the prime minister the right to start taking revenge, does not give the right to start interfering with the independence of this important structure and clergy.”

Sarah Whiston added: “We have not heard any evidence of foreign political control over the church, political parties, etc. We know about the government’s accusations, which were presented to the Investigative Committee, that there are external forces that are putting pressure on Diaspora Armenians to supposedly come to Armenia and vote. But even if it were, it would not necessarily be a crime. Armenians have the right to come to Armenia and vote.”

Details in the video




Lay members of the Supreme Spiritual Council were invited to the Inquiry

March: 12, 2026

Lay members of the Supreme Spiritual Council were summoned to the Investigative Committee. Former justice minister Gevorg Danielyan, one of the members of the council, confirmed this information to “Azat”.

According to Danielyan, within the framework of the case of obstructing the execution of the judicial act, the purpose of the invitation to investigate is the failure of the meeting of the Supreme Spiritual Council.

The meeting of the Supreme Spiritual Council, which started a few days ago, was interrupted due to the absence of those invited to investigate.

The investigator refused to comment.

According to the Echmiadzin report, at the meeting of the Supreme Spiritual Council, which started two days ago in the Mother See, under the leadership of the Catholicos of All Armenians, “issues affecting church life” are discussed.