Palestinian-Israeli election arrangements detailed by Minister Urayq

Palestinian-Israeli election arrangements detailed by Minister Urayqat

Al-Jazeera TV, Doha
20 Dec 04

Text of telephone interview with Palestinian Negotiations Affairs
Minister Sa’ib Urayqat, in Jericho, by presenter Lina Zahr-al-Din;
broadcast live by Qatari Al-Jazeera satellite TV on 20 December

[Zahr-al-Din] I have with me from Jericho Dr Sa’ib Urayqat, Palestinian
minister of negotiation affairs. Dr Sa’ib, could you please give
us further details on the proceedings of this [Palestinian-Israeli]
meeting? Did you discuss security issues?

[Urayqat] The meeting centred on adopting the same arrangements made
for the 1996 elections. The main emphasis was on the city of Jerusalem
and the sons of our Palestinian people in East Jerusalem. There was
also discussion of the election campaign, the candidates’ election
campaign centres, the polling stations in the city of Jerusalem –
the Armenian neighbourhood, Salah Al-Din Street, Shu’fat, Bayt Hanina,
Al-Tur – and the role of international observers in these campaigns.

We also stressed to them that the arrangements preceding the elections
are not only for the polling day. The arrangements include the
registration of voters [and] the candidates; the election programmes
and campaigns; and the movement of the candidates, their agents and
party members in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and the areas in between,
including Jerusalem.

Therefore, we asked that the situation be restored to what it
was before 28 September 2000. This means guaranteeing a halt to
assassinations, incursions and arrests; the removal of roadblocks;
and the lifting of the closure. We want international observers to
have a greater role in this respect.

We agreed in principle that the arrangements should be the same as
those made for the 1996 elections. There is, however, a need for an
expanded meeting to be attended by security men and professionals in
such fields as statistics. We agreed to hold this meeting within the
next two days.

[Zahr-al-Din] So we can say that you received guarantees that the
residents of East Jerusalem would vote without Israeli conditions.

[Urayqat] Yes, we asked the Israeli side to announce in a clear,
official statement that the status of the Palestinian citizens
in East Jerusalem who would participate in the elections would
not be harmed. This is because there are [Israeli] threats to use
the identity cards and privileges [of East Jerusalem residents to
blackmail them]. We hope that the Israeli government will announce
this as soon as possible.

[Zahr-al-Din] Thank you very much.

BAKU: “New diplomacy” emerging in world – Azeri TV

“New diplomacy” emerging in world – Azeri TV

ANS TV, Baku
19 Dec 04

An analytical programme on Azerbaijan’s ANS TV has said that old
diplomacy is being replaced with a new system of diplomatic relations
in the world. Commenting on the Azerbaijani president’s recent remarks
in response to the Russian speaker’s statement that Armenia is a
Russian outpost in the South Caucasus, ANS said that the new system
is open, short and strict and is based on “athletic capabilities
and frankness” rather than techniques, which is why President Ilham
Aliyev was also frank when he questioned Armenia’s independent policy.
The following is an excerpt from the “Otan Hafta” weekly analytical
programme by Azerbaijani TV station ANS on 19 December. Subheadings
have been inserted editorially:

Direct, strict and clear

[Presenter] On 17 December, or to be more precise, on the day of the
municipal elections, [Azerbaijani President] President Aliyev made an
important statement after casting his vote. The head of state expressed
an opinion questioning Armenia’s state independence in an interview
with journalists. We will look at this opinion against the background
of the qualitative changes that contemporary diplomacy is undergoing.

[Passage omitted: definitions of diplomacy on the screen]

[Ilham Aliyev, shown speaking to journalists] You know that the
chairman of the Russian State Duma said in Armenia that Armenia is
Russia’s outpost in the South Caucasus. So, we do not know, we have
always thought that Armenia is a state. But it turns out to be an
outpost. Shall we negotiate with the outpost or its owner? If this
issue is clarified in Armenia, better conditions will be created for
successful negotiations.

[Presenter over video of scenes in Yerevan and President Aliyev]
That’s it. Direct, strict and clearer than any hint – the Azerbaijani
president’s statement concerning Armenia’s state independence. Was
it really an emotional outburst of the head of state who could not
bridle his feelings? Let us not hurry to answer in the affirmative
and look at this statement along with similar statements that we have
encountered in the world recently and that are rising in numbers. By
saying that Armenia is not a state, but an outpost, Aliyev questions
its ability to make an independent decision. And this was the
first time that official Baku had put the issue in this way: who
shall we negotiate with? The outpost or its owner? In other words,
Russia or Armenia? This question also contains a logical answer. It
stresses the real objective of Russia, which is actually supposed to
be impartial in the group negotiating the restoration of Azerbaijan’s
territorial integrity. On the other hand, it outlines the final picture
of the biased positions of the states which normally say that the
resolution of the Karabakh problem is the exclusive authority of
the Azerbaijani and Armenian presidents. It is also a response to
the fact that Yerevan points to Xankandi as the new and old address
of the negotiations. In other words, Yerevan should thank Baku for
negotiating with Yerevan. In fact, the negotiations should have been
conducted with Armenia’s owner, Moscow.

Unprecedented openness

Incidentally, Azerbaijan has never accused Moscow in a presidential
statement. Yes, in isolated cases [Azerbaijani ex-President] Heydar
Aliyev condemned the fact that some circles in the Kremlin stand up for
Armenia, drew Moscow’s attention, with serious complaints and concern,
to the fact that some high-ranking officials of the Russian Defence
Ministry had sold Armenia weapons worth 1bn dollars and said that he
did not consider the forced statements of the Russian co-chairman [of
the OSCE Minsk Group] on the recognition of Azerbaijan’s territorial
integrity to be the Kremlin’s position. But in all these cases, the
talk was about some people and certain unidentified top officials,
while the recent statement was far away from being ambiguous with
a clear attribute and objective: Armenia is Russia’s outpost, it
is not a state. Thus, the Azerbaijani president came up with an
openness that we have not observed in domestic diplomacy so far. Is
it accidental? I think not. A new diplomatic environment and its
regulations are taking shape in the world. If we count similar
cases that we promised [to talk about] earlier to support our idea,
we can see that here the talk is not about an autonomous change in
the extraordinary separate policy of Azerbaijan. The fundamental
principles of the techniques of old diplomacy, which has been in
place to date, are failing. Now let us cite [examples]. Commenting
on the statement issued in defiance of Tbilisi by the winner of
the presidential elections in separatist Abkhazia, Sergey Bagapsh,
Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, who is facing the problem of
preserving his country’s territorial integrity, says that Bagapsh will
have to return to his native Russia. This is not the first serious
message sent by the Georgian leader to Moscow, which has managed to
keep its monopoly on the Abkhazia and South Ossetia problems so far
and is secretly Russifying the populations of these rebellious regions.

New diplomacy

Let us recall Moscow’s active involvement in the developments and
the Russian Foreign Ministry’s statements interfering in the internal
affairs of that country when Aslan Abashidze was removed from power
in Ajaria. The fact that Saakashvili named Russia again in the row
of separatists in his latest statement is an indication that Tbilisi
is speaking to Moscow in a new language of diplomacy.

Russia’s crude involvement in the developments in Ukraine and Moscow’s
interference in that country’s political fate are not a thing of the
remote past. And we clearly saw the Kremlin’s old diplomacy failing
when it tried to defend its position on developments in another
country. Renowned Moscow political image maker Gleb Pavlovskiy’s
attempts to install a pro-Russian Putin in Kiev collapsed in front
of our eyes.

Turkey’s long-time policy pursued in accordance with the rules of
old diplomacy for accession to the EU compelled Ankara to speak in an
abbreviated political language. The Turkish prime minister made a clear
hint that Turkey, which has been knocking on the door of the EU for
41 years, will not wait for another term and will follow the example
of Norway, which means a decision not to enter that entity. The most
interesting thing in all these developments is the fact that new
diplomacy is a system of regulations formed not from above by the
world’s super powers, but from below by weak countries which usually
see their rights trampled upon and suffer from discrimination and
administration of justice [as heard]. History is changing, while
suffering countries see a solution to their problems dragging on
for dozens of years and witness that old-fashioned negotiations do
not actually resolve any issue, but on the contrary, the problem is
getting forgotten as the generations change. The famous slogan of old
diplomacy, think about one thing, say another thing and do a different
thing is being seriously edited. Of course, diplomacy has now become
as frank as it can be. Since the world has become smaller and life is
passing faster, the old diplomacy has died out. The leaders of the
new generation want to remain in history not as people who used to
be just leaders for a certain time, but as historic personalities who
accomplished a great mission. The rules of dialectics are penetrating
diplomacy, too. Double standards are forcing the countries suffering
from international discrimination to take specific steps. The countries
that have consecutively faced discrimination and insistent distortion
of facts concerning them are responding to these approaches with
counter-measures. The number of biased approaches that have been
elevated to the level of international impudence is being felt in
their quality, and at this point, the rule of negating the negative
comes into effect.

The world’s super powers also have to play by the new rules. The
USA openly revises and criticizes the role of a gendarme Russia
wants to play in the former Soviet area, while Russia reminds the
USA specifically of what it committed in Iraq and Kosovo and stresses
that the democracy it exports is a combination designed for situations
that are of benefit to the White House. Even the powers like Russia
and the USA realize that the old diplomacy has already failed. The
system of new diplomatic relations is open, short and strict and rests
on athletic capabilities and frankness rather than techniques. The
Azerbaijani president was also frank at that moment.

Armenia should gradually quit negotiation process,NK politicians con

ARMENIA SHOULD GRADUALLY QUIT NEGOTIATION PROCESS, KARABAKH POLITICIANS CONSIDER

PanArmenian News
Dec 20 2004

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ “The principal part of the conflict remained beyond
the negotiation process. Besides all, we were the belligerent”,
member of the commission for foreign policy of the NKR parliament,
AFR Dashnaktsutyun representative Maxim Mirzoyan considers.
Non-participation of the Karabakh party in the negotiations is not
justified, he said in his interview with Azg Armenian newspaper.
Editor-in-chief of “Demo” newspaper Gegham Baghdsarian says there are
issues “Armenia is not empowered to negotiate on, for example, the
issue of the liberated territories”. Developing the topic, Mirzoian
says that Armenia should categorically state that she will not take
part in the talks without Nagorno Karabakh. Moreover, Armenia should
gradually quit the negotiation process, leaving Stepanakert and
Baku at the bargaining table”. Karabakh political scientist Murad
Petrosian is of the same opinion: “Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan
Oskanian’s statement that if Baku brings forward the discussion of
the issue in the UN Armenia will quit the negotiation process should
have been made still in 1994”, he says.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

“If Turkey were European we would know it”: leader of former Frenchr

“IF TURKEY WERE EUROPEAN WE WOULD KNOW IT” LEADER OF FORMER FRENCH
RULING PARTY CONSIDERS

PanArmenian News
Dec 20 2004

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Supporters of the Northern League Party in Italy
took to the streets to protest at the decision. According to media
reports, they unfurled banners saying, “yes to Christian roots”.
Nicolas Sarkozy, former Finance Minister and “rising star of French
politics”, renewed his call for a “privileged partnership” with Turkey,
rather than full membership. Mr Sarkozy, who hopes to take over from
Jacques Chirac as French President in 2007, said, “If Turkey were
European, we would know it. I’m for a privileged partnership but I’m
reserved about membership, like a large number of notable voices”,
Richard Carter, EU Observer reporter, writes in his article dedicated
to the reaction to EU’s decision in some European countries. Austrian
Chancellor Wolfgang Schussel announced that his country would join
France in holding a referendum on Turkey’s accession, adding another
potential obstacle in Ankara’s path. This decision was criticized by
Dutch Foreign Minister Bernard Bot who said, “we have never said to
the Turks, neither in 1999 nor in 2002, that a referendum would lie at
the end of the process. We have to be fair”. And Swedish daily Dagens
Nyheter reports that the Kurdish minority in Turkey are disappointed
because their hopes to have their language recognized were not raised
as a issue. Of the 70 million people in Turkey, 20 million are Kurds.

Christmas Message of Archbishop Khajag Barsamian

PRESS OFFICE
Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern)
630 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Contact: Jake Goshert, Coordinator of Information Services
Tel: (212) 686-0710 Ext. 60; Fax: (212) 779-3558
E-mail: [email protected]
Website:

December 20, 2004
___________________

Following is the Christmas message from Archbishop Khajag Barsamian,
Primate of the Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern).
Attached is the same message, in both English and Armenian.

* * *

TIDINGS OF JOY TO ALL PEOPLE

And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field,
keeping watch over their flock by night. And, lo, the angel of the Lord
came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and
they were sore afraid. And the angel said unto them, “Fear not: for,
behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all
people.” (Luke 2:8-10)

The angel promised that his “good tidings of great joy” would one day be
known by all people. But the announcement itself, on that glorious
night 2,000 years ago, was made to only a few, humble shepherds, in
fields removed from any city or village. To reach the ears of the
entire world, the announcement would have to be repeated, from person to
person, from heart to heart, from generation to generation.

And yet through all those numberless repetitions, down to the present
day, these “good tidings” have never lost their freshness. They have
never lost their ability to inspire wonder and love. They are eternally
young, and yet contain the wisdom of the ages.

It is a paradox exemplified by the church itself. Though very old by
human standards, the church at its best has never lost the ability to
inspire, delight, and awaken souls of every age with the wonderful,
surprising, “good tidings” of God’s miraculous gift to mankind. The
gift of Jesus Christ has inspired the Armenian people to the heights of
creativity and heroism, and has sustained us through every trial. At
every critical juncture of our history, we have been able to refresh
ourselves in the knowledge that our destiny lies with Him — through
whom death is vanquished, sacrifice redeemed, and despair transfigured
into winged hope.

Perhaps that ability to refresh — to renew — explains why the idea of
the youthful heart and spirit figures so prominently at Christmas. Not
“youthful” in the superficial sense of immature age, but in a broader
sense suggesting energetic vigor, unspoiled innocence, optimistic
wonder, and openness to the vast horizon of possibility. Certainly,
those are the characteristics of youth we associate with the Christmas
season. But they need not be limited to a single time of year — nor
even to the merely young in age.

This is the message our Diocese will explore in the coming year, whose
theme will be “The Year of the Youth: Passing the Torch.” While our
main objective will be to reach out to our younger generation —
inspiring and preparing them to be leaders of our church — we also want
to remind all our people, of every age, of Christ’s power to refresh the
heart and renew the spirit, to make us all worthy to accept and carry
His torch for our generation.

What is that torch? For Armenian Christians, it is the flickering flame
of our heritage and tradition, fueled by generations of creativity,
sacrifice, and simple faith. Its luminescence is the light of Christ:
the light that guided the wise men to Bethlehem; the light that shined
on our homeland 1,703 years ago; the light that illuminates, warms, and
nourishes us to this day. Always new. Ever-youthful. Unquenchable.

That is the torch we have been given: the torch we must ultimately pass
on to others, when our own day is done. In the meantime, it is ours to
tend and care for; to respect, cherish, and replenish with the energy of
our own faithful labor. Above all, the torch is meant to inspire us, to
guide our steps, to help us press on in the dark of night; to comfort
our hearts with those “good tidings of great joy” — first announced
2,000 years ago, but as fresh, new and youthful as tomorrow.

In this holy season, let us rejoice again in those good tidings, as we
proclaim:
Krisdos dzunav yev haydnetzav! Orhnyal eh haydnootiunun Krisdosee!
Christ is born and revealed! Blessed is the revelation of Christ!

With prayers,
Archbishop Khajag Barsamian
Primate
January 2005

www.armenianchurch.org

some 40 refugees from 2 camps visit Moravian Karst

SOME 40 REFUGEES FROM TWO CAMPS VISIT MORAVIAN KARST

Czech News Agency (CTK)
December 19, 2004

BLANSKO, South Moravia, Dec 19 ; (MS) — Some 40 refugees from the
Zbysov and Zastavka facilities in south Moravia visited sights in
the Moravian Karst today, Martina Vodickova from the Nesehnuti civic
association has told CTK adding they were very much pleased with
the trip.

Vodickova said that refugees, many of whom are families with children,
do not have enough opportunities and money to spend their leisure time
in an attractive way while waiting for their asylum applications to
be processed.

This can result in pathological phenomena, such as loss of interest
in developments around them, alcoholism and tension in the group they
live in, Svatava Zajdakova from Nesehnuti said.

Vodickova said that the untraditional tourists were refugees from
the Islamic regime in Iran, the Chechnya conflict, desperate social
conditions in Armenia as well human rights violations in Vietnam.

“We want to show that the refugees are people like us, who are not
coming to threaten us or to take work from us, but they only seek
safety in the Czech Republic,” Vodickova said.

The Moravian Karst administration did not collect entry fees from
the refugees.

Nesehnuti plans further actions for the refugees, including trips,
cultural actions, sports activities, as well as a theatre performance
for children.

Turkey faces bitter divide on EU entry

Turkey faces bitter divide on EU entry
by Gareth Jenkins in Istanbul and Matthew Campbell in Paris

Sunday Times (London)
December 19, 2004, Sunday

FIXING a date for starting accession talks with the European Union
next year was hard enough but the toughest task for Turkey has yet
to come. Pressure was growing yesterday on the government of Recep
Tayyip Erdogan, not just to win hearts and minds in Europe, but to
convince his own people that he has struck a good deal.

He returned to Ankara yesterday to a hero’s welcome from 2,000
supporters waving Turkish and EU flags.

Yet the agreement reached in Brussels on Friday after hours of
ill-tempered wrangling fell short of Erdogan’s hopes and fuelled
unrest among nationalists and hardline Islamists in his Justice and
Development party.

One newspaper yesterday said Erdogan had “dishonoured” the country
with what EU diplomats saw as his tacit agreement to recognise the
divided island of Cyprus, which joined the EU in May.

Mehmet Agar, leader of the opposition True Path party, said: “The
government does not have the right to give away at the negotiating
table what the Turkish people won by sacrificing their lives.”

Erdogan, whose government has bent over backwards to accommodate
Brussels’ conditions, said the country would not sit back now the date
for the start of accession talks had been fixed as October 3, 2005.

“This result will not spoil us, will not relax us,” he told the crowd
at the airport. “We will work harder until October 3.” It still might
not be enough.

Some member states strongly oppose the idea of predominantly Muslim
Turkey entering the European fold: effectively, each EU country can
scupper Turkish membership by voting “no” in a referendum. The French
and Austrian leaders have promised their electorates a chance to do
so and others may follow suit.

President Jacques Chirac appeared to shift the goalposts after
Friday’s agreement by announcing that Ankara would have to recognise
massacres of Armenians in the early 20th century if it wanted French
support. “The French people will have the last word,” he said.

That spells a problem for Turkey. So does Austria, where a heated
public debate about letting in the Turks has included allusions to
the Ottoman siege of Vienna in 1683.

The British, meanwhile, were not alone in expressing anxiety about
an influx of migrants competing for jobs. There are also concerns
across the EU about the cost of Turkish accession.

Turkish nationalists say the government has already made too many
concessions.

Erdogan’s promise to expand Turkey’s customs union agreement to include
Cyprus and nine other EU members, although not constituting a legal
commitment, could prove the last straw for disenchanted supporters.

Erdogan’s entourage includes figures fervently opposed to recognition
of the Greek-Cypriot government and they were growing restless even
before the Brussels summit.

They were exasperated at Erdogan’s failure to reform the secular
tradition established by Mustafa Kemal, or Ataturk, the founder of
modern Turkey.

Some had been privately discussing jumping ship to the True Path
party in frustration at delays in implementing reforms that would
ease restrictions on Islamic schools and lift a ban on women wearing
headscarves in public institutions.

But tinkering with the secular code runs the risk of triggering a
reaction from the Turkish military, which forced the previous Islamic
government out of office in 1997 to safeguard Ataturk’s vision.

Just as troublesome will be the question of the Kurds. The scheduling
of accession talks marks the beginning of a process of intense EU
scrutiny.

Erdogan’s statement that Turkey was committed to EU values coincided
with one by his police chief at a press conference in Ankara: an
investigation had been launched into a group of Kurdish intellectuals
whose “crime” was to place an advert in a newspaper asking for
more rights.

Since Britain will hold the EU presidency in the second half of next
year, Tony Blair will chair the first talks. The prime minister has
championed Turkey’s efforts to join the EU and hailed the agreement as
“an immensely significant day”.

The agreement had almost fallen through as Erdogan haggled. On
top of being pressured on Cyprus, he was forced to accept that the
negotiations did not guarantee that Turkey would win full membership.

And even if Turkey joins the EU, it must accept restrictions on
migration of its citizens to other member states.

It will be hard for Erdogan to convince some Turks that this is not
an offer of membership in an EU “second division”, a formula favoured
by French politicians.

He may feel like a mountaineer: he has climbed one summit, only to
see a new range of peaks rising before him.

Additional reporting:

Nicola Smith, Brussels

Beastly reasons to welcome Turks, Rod Liddle, page 14

France will put all issues to Turkey, including ‘Armenian genocide’

France will put all issues to Turkey, including ‘Armenian genocide’: FM

Agence France Presse — English
December 20, 2004 Monday 9:00 AM GMT

PARIS Dec 20 — France will put all issues to Turkey during
negotiations over it joining the European Union, “including that of the
Armenian genocide,” French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier said Monday.

“What has to be done now is start membership negotiations which are
going to be very long, very difficult, during which we will put all
issues on the table, including that of the Armenian genocide, with
the hope of obtaining a response from Turkey before membership,”
he told French radio station RTL.

The 1915-1917 massacre of Armenians during the end of the Ottoman
Empire has been a sensitive subject for Turkey, which has railed
against other countries accepting the Armenians’ account of the
bloodshed as a “genocide”.

Although the French parliament passed a 2001 law applying the word
“genocide” to the killings, the French government avoided using
the term until December 14 — just three days before Turkey and the
European Union agreed to start membership talks. Barnier talked of the
“Armenian genocide” in parliament.

French President Jacques Chirac supports Turkey joining the European
Union, but he faces deep opposition from his own ruling party and
the majority of voters.

To add the Armenian issue to a list of others — most notably Ankara’s
recognition of the Greek Cypriot government — is seen as a bargaining
chip in the membership negotiations that are to begin in October next
year, and a way of showing the French public that Turkey is being
made to heed Paris’s voice.

Barnier said that Chirac, in supporting Turkey, “is expressing a
vision, expressing where the interest of our country, our continent,
lies for him.”

The French president has promised that the final decision on whether
Turkey gets to join the European Union or not, as far as French
voters are concerned, will come in a referendum at the end of the
negotiations.

The art of slow nurturing; Maro Gorky

Los Angeles Times
December 20, 2004 Monday
Home Edition

The art of slow nurturing;
Maro Gorky, daughter of an influential painter, found a muse for her
own work in her Tuscany garden.

by Hunter Drohojowska-Philp, Special to The Times

When you keep a guest room available for director Bernardo
Bertolucci, you are bound to see yourself in his films sooner or
later. So it was that Maro Gorky and Matthew Spender saw their
artistic lives in Tuscany used as fictional backdrop for the 1996
romantic coming-of-age film “Stealing Beauty.”

“It wasn’t even our house,” protests Gorky, who is seated on the
damask sofa of Silva Bezdikian, an art dealer who is showing Gorky’s
paintings at her Beverly Hills home. Gorky’s jewel- toned views of
the Tuscan landscape are mounted on easels in the living room.
Opening a book called “Tuscan Interiors,” she turns to an 18th
century stone hunting lodge that really is their home. “See? Our
house is much prettier. I think the house is my installation. Matthew
has a beautiful barn — his cathedral to the arts. Also, we are much
tidier than the people in the film.”

The film portrays a middle-aged couple thriving in idyllic
surroundings with fresh, delicious food, diverting company and
dedicated creative enterprise. It is an idealized view, of course,
but still based on the truth of their remarkable lives. “In the
morning, I do my gardening and in the afternoon, I paint and cook and
make supper,” says Gorky, 62. “Weekends or holidays, we have company.
Otherwise, it is a lonely life in the most beautiful part of the
world.”

Gorky and Spender moved to Avane, as their Tuscan home is called, in
1968. They were members of the counterculture that fled London for a
more rural existence. Just as important, they are children of famous
parents, and they sought both geographical and emotional distance
from their past.

Abstract painter Arshile Gorky committed suicide in 1948 when his
daughter Maro was just 5. Her memories of him are slim but potent and
drove her commitment to become a painter, leading her to study with
Frank Auerbach at the prestigious Slade School of Art in London,
where she graduated in 1965.

Her husband of 42 years, Matthew, is the son of the late English poet
Stephen Spender. After reading history at Cambridge, Matthew pursued
poetry but disliked living in the shadow of his legendary father so
instead became a writer and sculptor. His carved-wood and stone
figures populate the land around their Tuscan villa and were featured
in the film.

“Because we had complicated parents, our aim in life is a simple and
quiet life in the country,” Gorky says. Her round eyes and prominent
features make her look as though she stepped out of one of her
father’s canvases. While living their rural lives, the couple had two
daughters, Cosima and Saskia. As teenagers, those daughters decided
country life was a bit too quiet. Cosima married Valerio Bonelli, who
is now working as a production assistant on a film being made in Los
Angeles. (Saskia married writer Carter Coleman.) Because Cosima and
her young daughter were going to be spending many months in Los
Angeles, Gorky saw this as an ideal time to show her abstract
landscapes with Bezdikian.

Bezdikian is Lebanese Armenian. Gorky, who usually exhibits at Long &
Ryle gallery in London, finds it ironic to be sought out at least in
part because of her Armenian roots. After moving to America in 1920,
her father denied his origins, falsely claiming to be Russian and a
nephew of the writer Maxim Gorky. Still, she was drawn to art by her
heritage. “It was my father who made me a painter. Not by compulsion,
of course, but by example,” she says.

A show of Arshile Gorky’s works on paper and paintings is at Jack
Rutberg Fine Arts on La Brea Avenue through Friday. The drawings were
in the estate of Hans Burkhardt, an artist represented by the
gallery. Spender, who wrote a book on Arshile Gorky, says: “The
drawings have the sense of Gorky as a teacher. He taught Hans
Burckhardt but also Mark Rothko. He was authoritarian …. This is an
opportunity to see how helpful he was as a teacher.”

Maro Gorky adds: “My father’s spirit is strong. His ghost makes
itself felt. It is a privilege up to a point but also invidious
comparison. People will look at what you do and say, ‘Ah, but her
father was so much better.’ ”

Gorky finds her inspiration in the natural world. Of the 32 acres
that they own, she cultivates a dozen. She is an avid gardener who
dedicates each morning to pruning and caring for trees, vines and
olives, not to mention the kitchen garden. Pulling her red shawl
around her, she talks about the influence of such lush surroundings.

“It is very important because you learn about the pruning of trees,
and that affects the structure in the painting.” Discussing her 2003
painting “The Drive,” she explains, “You can see a well-pruned
mulberry and a climbing pink clematis. A pruned honeysuckle, cypress
trees, lime trees and industrial vineyards around a blue drive. They
are almost like aboriginal paintings, maps of what I see in front of
me. I see things next to one another in spatial relationships.” ”

*

Maro Gorky

Paintings by Gorky may be seen by appointment at SB Fine Art in
Beverly Hills. Contact: (310) 276-7766 or

“Arshile Gorky: The Early Years” is

on view at Jack Rutberg Fine Arts, 357 N. La Brea Ave., through
Friday. Contact: (323) 938-5222 or www .jackrutbergfinearts.com

www.sbfineartgallery.com

ARKA News Agency – 12/20/2004

ARKA News Agency
Dec 20 2004

Presentation of guide of South Caucasus writers’ works takes place in
Stepanakert

RA Minister of Defense Serge Sargsian and the Head of OSCE Mission to
Yerevan Vladimir Pryakhin discuss perspectives of development of
Syunik region of Armenia

Exhibition of schoolchildren paintings from Armenian marzes to be
held on Dec 20-30 in Yerevan

Chairman of board of Bank Turanalem Yerzhan Tatishev perished
tragically on sunday morning

RA Prime Minister congratulates participants of the international
chess internet- tournament

RA President signs a decree on convocation of RA NA special session
on Dec 24, 2004

*********************************************************************

PRESENTATION OF GUIDE OF SOUTH CAUCASUS WRITERS’ WORKS TAKES PLACE IN
STEPANAKERT

STEPANAKERT, December 20. /ARKA/. Presentation of guide of South
Caucasus writers’ works took place in Stepanakert. The guide
represents small works – novels and stories – of 18 authors from
South Caucasus. Nagorno Karabakh is represented with the story of
Vardges Ovian “I Love You Life”.
The guide was presented by coordinators of the project Alvard
Barkhudarian and Geham Baghdasarian.
Guide of South Caucasus writers’ works “Time to Live” was edited in
support of Forum of NGOs and Fund of Hienrich Bell (Germany). The
guide was printed in Maikop (Russia) in 5800 examples. L.D. –0–

*********************************************************************

RA MINISTER OF DEFENSE SERGE SARGSIAN AND THE HEAD OF OSCE MISSION TO
YEREVAN VLADIMIR PRYAKHIN DISCUSS PERSPECTIVES OF DEVELOPMENT OF
SYUNIK REGION OF ARMENIA

YEREVAN, December 20. /ARKA/. RA Minister of Defense Serge Sargsian
and the Head of OSCE Mission to Yerevan, the Ambassador Vladimir
Pryakhin discussed perspectives of development of Syunik region of
Armenia, Press Secretary of RA Ministry of Defense Seiran
Shakhsuvarian told ARKA. Pryakin represented the Minister the program
of socio-economic development of the region that was discussed by the
citizens and the administration of the region and was highly
estimated. L.D. –0–

*********************************************************************

EXHIBITION OF SCHOOLCHILDREN PAINTINGS FROM ARMENIAN MARZES TO BE
HELD ON DEC 20-30 IN YEREVAN

YEREVAN, December 20. /ARKA/. Exhibition of schoolchildren paintings
from Armenian marzes will be held on Dec 20-30 in Yerevan in the
frames of REDAM (Regional Development in Armenia) program. As REDAM
Press Service told ARKA, the exhibition will present paintings of all
participants of the REDAM competition held among schoolchildren of
Ararat and Vayots Dzor marzes of Armenia.
REDAM (Regional Development in Armenia) is EU-TACIS technical
assistance program. In involves Ararat and Vayots Dzor marzes of
Armenia. T.M. –0–

*********************************************************************

CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF BANK TURANALEM YERZHAN TATISHEV PERISHED
TRAGICALLY ON SUNDAY MORNING

YEREVAN, December 20. /ARKA/. On Sunday morning 38 years old Chairman
of Board of Directors of JSC Bank TuranAlem Yerzhan Tatishev perished
tragically as a result of accident on hunting, as the Press Bank
Service reports. The extraordinary meeting of the Board of Director
of the bank was elected Deputy Chairman of Board of Directors
Mameshtegi Saduakas Khalyksovetully. “Bank TuranAlem officially
states on preservation of its stable activity in accordance to
earlier stated strategy and will continue the activity of all
representations, affiliates and cash departments in previous regime”,
the statement of the bank says.
As Chairman of the central bank of Armenia Tigran Sargsyan stated
Kazakh Bank TuranAlem was planning to acquire 100% of shares of one
of the Armenian banks. Relevant negotiations are already being held
and Armenian and Kazakh bank signed preliminary agreement.
JSC Bank TuranAlem was established in 1997, in October 1998 it was
reorganized to OJSC Bank TuranAlem. It has 23 affiliates in
Kazakhstan, as well as three representations in Russia, Ukraine and
China. The shareholders of the Bank are EBRD, Raiffeisen Zentralbank,
International Financial Corporation, DEG (Investments Company of the
German Government), Dutch Development Bank (FMO).
The assets of the Bank as per international standards as of Nov 12004
made around USD 4b (the sixth place among CIS private banks).
Currently the Bank’s banking network include Slavinvestbank,
Transbank (Ukraine), Astana-Eximbank (Belarus), Omskbank. Recently
Bank TuranAlem stated on its plans around opening affiliates in
Azerbaijan and Armenia and on purchasing of a bank in Tatarstan
(Russia). TuranAlem has representations in Moscow, Ekaterinburg,
Minsk, Kiev and Bishkek. The Bank is planning to open representations
in Yerevan, Baku, Kazan, St. Petersburg and Saransk. T.M. –0–

*********************************************************************

RA PRIME MINISTER CONGRATULATES PARTICIPANTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL
CHESS INTERNET- TOURNAMENT

YEREVAN, December 20. /ARKA/. RA Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan
congratulates participants of the international chess internet-
tournament devoted to the 75th anniversary of the Chess World
Champion Tigran Petrosyan. As he said, this is the first such
tournament, in which leading teams and chess players participate. “We
understand that the sequence of tournaments devoted to the 75th
anniversary of Petrosyan, a legendary World Champion, will continue”,
he said. According to Margaryan, holding a tournament with the use of
modern technologies is a logical progress of the game of millions
toward new and rapidly developing virtual world.
Margaryan greeted the teams of Armenia, Russia, China and France that
will fight for the championship, as well as the initiators and the
main organizers: RA Chess Federation and RA Academy of Chess. A.H. —
0–

*********************************************************************

RA PRESIDENT SIGNS A DECREE ON CONVOCATION OF RA NA SPECIAL SESSION
ON DEC 24, 2004

YEREVAN, December 20. /ARKA/. RA President Robert Kocharyan signed a
decree on convocation of RA NA special session on Dec 24, 2004.
According to RA President’s Press Service Department, the agenda of
the session includes about 20 issues, in particular, the issue of
discussion of the draft law on the RA state budget-2005, as well as
amendments and additions to tax, customs and judicial-executive
legislations, and the laws on administrative violations and pensions.
A.H.—0–

*********************************************************************

–Boundary_(ID_9OZSMqXoBkQCzrDcfkj4Rg)–