Day of Armenia to be held in Japan in Summer 2005

DAY OF ARMENIA TO BE HELD IN JAPAN IN SUMMER 2005

PanArmenian News
Feb 19 2005

19.02.2005 15:01

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ June 7 this year within the framework of an
international exhibition a Day of Armenia will be held in Japan, head
of the Department of Foreign Economic Policy of the Ministry of Trade
and Economic Development of Armenia Garegin Melkonian stated. In
his words, Armenia will be presented with an individual stand at
the exposition. At present talks on accession of the country to the
International Exhibitions Organization are being held and Armenia may
become the organization member by the yearend. In Melkonian’s words,
over 30 exhibitions are planned to be held Armenia in 2005. These
will be organized by Logos Expo Center, Expo Media, Commercial and
Industrial Chamber, Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, the
Armenian Development Agency. The expositions will be held under the
aegis of the Ministry of Trade and Economic Development.

Giving the gift of music

GIVING THE GIFT OF MUSIC
By Glenn Lovell

San Jose Mercury News
Feb 19 2005

Mercury News

Nahum Guzik leafed through a stack of e-mail printouts, looking for
the one about the Armenian baby and the 1989 earthquake.

“It’s tear-jerking story, but it’s true,” he said. “The hospital in
ruins . . . the baby frozen, dead. . . . But then, when they bring
her home, she begins to cry.”

Now, thanks to the 70-year-old Russian emigre — founder of Guzik
Technical Enterprises in Mountain View and possibly Silicon Valley’s
least-known arts benefactor — that earthquake survivor is studying
piano in Vienna. She is one of hundreds of young Russian and Armenian
musicians whose training and, in some cases, international tours
have been made possible by more than $500,000 in gifts from Guzik’s
foundation.

“No, I don’t meet all the winners,” said Guzik, a small, wiry man with
a deliciously droll sense of humor. “But that’s fine, I don’t need to
be remembered. I just give the scholarship winners a start. If they
are successful, if I draw them out of obscurity, I am grateful. My
job is done.”

Last year’s seven Guzik Foundation artists, ranging in age from 13 to
22, will perform Wednesday at the Herbst Theatre in San Francisco,
and Thursday and Friday at the Florence Gould Theater at the Palace
of the Legion of Honor. Wednesday’s and Friday’s programs also will
feature the Moscow Chamber Orchestra. Winners Alexandre Bouzlov,
a cellist, and Haik Kazazyan, a violinist, will then make their
Carnegie Hall debuts in a Feb. 28 concert underwritten (for $90,000)
by the foundation.

“Haik has just signed with a big-concert agency, and Alexandre is
on his way to a major concert career,” said Constantine Orbelian,
the music director of the Moscow Chamber Orchestra, who, with Guzik’s
pianist cousin Svetlana Gorzhevskaya, oversees the open auditions in
Moscow and St. Petersburg in Russia, and in Erevan, Armenia.

Gifts big and small

Since it was established in 2001, the foundation has awarded
scholarships to 350 young musicians. Recipients receive anywhere from
a $100-a-month stipend to study at local conservatories to a $50,000
career grant for major concerts. Next year, the foundation plans to
mount a music festival at the Louvre Museum in Paris.

“Why do I give money? Because I think it’s a good thing to do, and I
love music,” explained Guzak, who still puts in a 50-hour work week
at Guzik Technical Enterprises, which makes test equipment for the
hard-disc-drive industry, including Hitachi GST. The Mountain View
plant reflects Guzik’s notoriously spare lifestyle — bare walls,
concrete floors, discount furniture. “I’m a slob,” he apologized,
laughing. “But the walls are clean.”

Road to Bay Area

Guzik (“button” in Polish) was born in Odessa in Ukraine but during
World War II fled with his family to the Urals, then Moscow. In 1972,
he emigrated to Israel. Ten months later, he arrived in the Bay Area.
He founded Guzik Technical Enterprises in 1982 and, in the years
since, has donated millions to cancer and stem-cell research. In 1996,
he received the Ellis Island Medal of Honor for his philanthropic
endeavors. He is not married and has a grown daughter at college.

While he has yet to return to Russia or his native Ukraine — “I
have some bad memories, but mostly good ones” — he has many Russian
friends in the Bay Area and an affinity for Russian culture. His
favorite composer: Dmitri Shostakovich.

“I know Russia, and I know the country is not in great economical
shape, so young talent is neglected, schools in disrepair,” he said.
“Russia used to produce a lot of great musicians, and doesn’t now.
So I try to participate to help.”

`I was never musical’

Asked whether Guzik’s largess stems from some unrealized childhood
dream to play great music, Orbelian said his boss is a brilliant
inventor-businessman with “an internal need for music.”

“Sure, my mother wanted me to play piano — I’m a Jewish kid,” Guzik
said, laughing. “I escaped it. I never was musical.”

Which is why he defers to Orbelian and cousin Gorzhevskaya’s
scholarship choices.

“I like the music: It fills up the vacuum emotionally. But I cannot
tell what’s good or bad, or judge their musical abilities. At same
time I am not bad judge of human qualities. You cannot run a small
company without that.”

Though he has no plans to retire, and appears healthy enough, Guzik
describes himself as a workaholic diabetic who started smoking again
10 years ago. “When I croak,” he said matter-of-factly, “whatever
I own will go to the foundation. What people will do with it, God
knows. But I hope they will follow what I started.”

Child Protection audit in US Catholic Exarchate

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB)
Office of Child & Youth Protection | 3211 4th Street, N.E., Washington DC
20017-1194 | (202) 541-3000 [email protected]

2004 Diocesan and Eparchial Compliance Audits of the Implementation of the
Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People

2004 Audit Executive Summary: Apostolic Exarchate of Armenian Catholics

Exarch Manual Batakian Previous Audit- incomplete 2003

The information found herein represents conditions as they were found to
exist during the period from August 24 to 26, 2004.

Findings

To Promote Healing and Reconciliation (Articles 1, 2 and 3)

The Exarchate does have a policy on the prevention of sexual abuse of minors
by clergy. This program is based on the agreement of five of the six
dioceses, in which the Exarchate’s clergy conduct their ministry, to support
the Exarchate in its implementation of the Charter. The Exarchate does not
have its own outreach program to provide outreach designed to offer pastoral
care to victims/survivors and their families as it is not anticipated that
diocesan clergy will provide this service within the Exarchate. The Bishop
or his representative has not met with, or offered to meet with all
victims/survivors who have reported allegations of abuse since the last
compliance audit since there are no known victims/survivors as of the time
of the audit. The Bishop or his delegate has not directed outreach to all
faith communities in which the sexual abuse occurred because there are no
known victims/survivors. The Exarchate does have a mechanism in place to
respond promptly to any allegation where there is reason to believe that
sexual abuse of a minor occurred. A Required Action was issued regarding the
absence of an Outreach Program (see Required Action # 1)
The Exarchate does not have its own victim assistance coordinator as it
relies on the support of the victim assistance coordinators in five of the
Roman dioceses in which the Exarchate’s clergy reside. Negotiations continue
to secure similar support from the sixth and final diocese in which the
Exarchate conducts ministry (see required Action # 5). This arrangement also
applies to the establishment and constitution of a Review Board.
The procedures for making a complaint of abuse are not readily available in
printed form and have not been the subject of periodic public announcements.
Required Action #6 was issued The Exarchate relies on the Roman dioceses to
provide those needed services. The Exarchate has not entered into
confidentiality agreement during the audit period.

To Guarantee Effective Response to Allegations of Abuse of a Minor (Articles
4, 5, 6 and 7)

The Exarchate has never had any allegations of sexual abuse of a minor. With
regard to the Exarchate’s compliance with these Articles of the Charter, the
Exarchate complies in that it has arranged for five of the six dioceses in
which its clergy serve to support it in its implementation of the Charter.
Although dialogue continues with the sixth and final diocese, agreement has
not been reached as of the time of this audit and a Required Action (# 5)
was issued. The Exarchate has relied on its supporting dioceses to establish
effective liaison with civil authorities, ensuring that an open dialogue
regarding sexual abuse allegations will occur through its arrangement with
the dioceses in which its clergy serve. The Exarchate also relies on the
cooperation of its supporting dioceses with public authorities about
reporting in cases when the person is no longer a minor. To date, the
Exarchate has not had to advise victims/survivors of their right to report
allegations of abuse by a member of the clergy to civil authorities as there
have been no victims.
The Exarchate relies upon its supporting dioceses to conduct a preliminary
investigation in harmony with canon law. If a preliminary investigation so
indicated, the Exarchate will notify the Congregation for the Doctrine of
Faith and apply the precautionary measures mentioned in CIC, canon 1722, or
CCEO, canon 1473. When accusations against a priest or a deacon are proved
to be unfounded, the Exarchate will take steps to restore the good name of
the priest or deacon.
When sexual abuse of a minor by a priest or a deacon is admitted or
established after an appropriate process in accord with canon law, the
Exarchial policies provide that the offending priest or deacon be
permanently removed from ministry. The Exarchate will offer professional
assistance to offending priests or deacons as per its policy.
In every case involving canonical penalties, the Exarchial processes
provided for in canon law will be observed as per its policy. Accused clergy
will similarly be encouraged to retain the assistance of civil and canonical
counsel. When necessary, the Exarchate will also supply canonical counsel to
a priest or deacon.
If the penalty of dismissal from the clerical state has not been applied,
the Exarchate has committed to direct the offender to lead a life of prayer
and penance. The Exarchate’s policy does not allow the offender to celebrate
Mass publicly, to administer the sacraments, or to present himself publicly
as a priest.
The Exarchate has established clear and well-publicized standards of
ministerial behavior for priests and deacons. A communications policy is not
in effect which reflects the Bishop’s pledge to be open and transparent on
issues regarding the sexual abuse of children (see Required Action # 2). The
Exarchate has not had an occasion to date to assist and support all parish
communities directly affected by ministerial misconduct involving minors as
there has never been a reported incident of sexual abuse.

To Protect the Faithful in the Future (Articles 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17)

The Exarchate has not implemented a “safe environment” education program
(see required Action # 3). The Exarchate has clear standards of conduct for
persons in positions of trust with regard to sexual abuse which will be
publicized. The Exarchate has not conducted background evaluations for any
Exarchial and parish personnel who have regular contact with minors, using
appropriate law enforcement resources where permissible (see Required Action
# 4). The Exarchate does employ adequate screening and evaluative techniques
in deciding the fitness of candidates for ordination.
The Exarchate has not transferred any priest or deacon who has had a
credible allegation of sexual abuse made against him to another ministerial
assignment since the last audit. The Exarchate has not transferred any
priest or deacon who has had a credible allegation of sexual abuse made
against him to another diocese/Exarchate for residence since the last audit
period. There have been no instances of sexual abuse of a minor.
The Bishop, or his designee, has not fully coordinated with each bishop or
major superior of men in each of dioceses the Exarchate’s clergy conduct
their ministry concerning addressing the issue of allegations of sexual
abuse of minors by clergy (see Required Action # 5). The Exarchate has not
had the opportunity to participate in research with other institutions in
the area of sexual abuse. The Exarchate’s systematic ongoing formation
program in keeping with the Basic Plan for the Ongoing Formation of Priests
is conducted by its seminaries which are not located in the United States.

Compliance with the Provisions of the Charter

At the conclusion of this compliance audit, the Exarchate was found to be
compliant with all articles of the Charter for the Protection of Children
and Young People with the exception of Articles 1, 2, 7, 12, 13 and 15. The
following Required Actions were issued:
REQUIRED ACTION # 1 (Article # 1) – Healing, Outreach and Reconciliation
The Exarchate will create and implement its own written Outreach Program to
provide for the healing, outreach and reconciliation of victims/survivors
and their families. Pastoral care should be provided for in this program and
it should also provide for periodic public announcements to encourage
victims/survivors and the families to come forward. This Outreach Program
should provide for counseling, spiritual assistance, support groups and
other social services as agreed upon by the victim/survivor and the
Exarchate.
REQUIRED ACTION # 2 (Article 7) – Communication Policy
The Exarchate will establish a written communications policy to demonstrate
its commitment to openness and transparency. This policy should fully avail
itself of already established forms of communication (ex. letters from the
Exarch, the Exarchate’s Publication entitled “The Flame”, parish bulletins
and parish sermons) to advise parishioners of its Outreach Program, to
invite participation in its Safe Environment Program, to publicize
initiatives taken to fulfill the mandates of the CHARTER as well as any
additional reason deemed appropriate by the Exarchate. This policy will also
pertain to the publication by clergy to parishioners of at least the
following documents: victim/survivor complaint forms, the Exarchate’s Code
of Conduct, the Exarchate’s Policy on the Sexual Abuse of Minors by Clergy
and church personnel and both the Exarchate’s Safe Environment and
Background Investigation programs. Communication of these initiatives will
be made as soon as possible and will also be subject of periodic
re-announcements.
REQUIRED ACTION # 3 (Article 12) – Safe Environment
That the Exarchate establish and implement a written “safe environment”
program which will provide training to ensure that children, youth, parents,
ministers, educators and other appropriate per: The Exarchate will establish
a written program to provide for the background investigation for all
Exarchial and parish personnel who have regular contact with minors. The
Exarchate will implement this program immediately upon its creation.
REQUIRED ACTION # 4 (Article 13) – Background Investigation
The Exarchate will establish a written program to provide for the background
investigation for all Exarchial and parish personnel who have regular
contact with minors. The Exarchate will implement this program immediately
upon its creation.
REQUIRED ACTION # 5 (Article 15) – Periodic meetings with diocesan bishops
The Exarch will meet with the cardinal who has not agreed to support the
Exarchate to discuss his request to receive the support of this diocese in
facilitating the implementation of the CHARTER on behalf of the Exarchate’s
clergy. In the event that such agreement is not reached, the Exarchate will
devise its own program to implement the CHARTER for its clergy in that
particular diocese.
REQUIRED ACTION #6 (Article 2) – Response and Reporting
Insure that procedures are established for making a complaint of abuse, that
they are available in printed form, and that they are the subject of
periodic public announcement.

Compliance with the Charter as of December 31, 2004
As of December 31, 2004, the Armenian Eparchy of Brooklyn was compliant with
all articles of the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People
except Articles 1, 2, 7, 12, and 13. The Eparchy completed the required
action outline in #5, (Article 15) above.

http://www.usccb.org/ocyp/dioceses04/2004auditpreface.shtml

Phillip Morris to boost production in Russia

Phillip Morris to boost production in Russia

RosBusinessConsulting Database
February 18, 2005 Friday 2:54 am, EST

The Leningrad Oblast’s Phillip Morris plant wants to become the
largest tobacco factory in Russia by increasing production by 40
percent in 2005, up from the 50bn cigarettes output last year, the
St. Petersburg Times said citing the company’s report. The total
cost of expanding existing facilities, which is a necessary step to
boost production, is estimated at $240m, Guy Guffers, Phillip Morris’
production director, was quoted as saying. Initially the Phillip
Morris Izhora (PMI) factory was built in the Leningrad region with
an investment of $360m. The factory is a fully-owned subsidiary of
Phillip Morris and produces the Marlboro, Parliament, Virginia Slims,
L&M, Chesterfield and Bond Street brands.

Phillip Morris operates two factories in Russia and exports production
to Ukraine, Belarus, Armenia, Moldova and Kazakhastan.

Gul: Turkish-Armenian Border Will Never Open

GUL: TURKISH-ARMENIAN BORDER WILL NEVER OPEN

Azg/arm
15 Feb 05

Abdullah Gul, Turkish foreign minister, met with Elmar Mamediarov,
his Azeri counterpart, within the framework of the official visit to
Turkey, on February 10. In response to the question put by a journalist
on the opening of the Turkish-Armenian border in the course of the
press conference held by the end of the meeting, Gul said: “Let the
Azeris be calm. Unless the Nagorno Karabakh issue is solved within
the framework of Azerbaijanâ~@~Ys territorial integrity, Turkey will
not open its border with Armenia and will not improve its relations
with Armenia.”

Turkish Public TV informed about this on February 11. According to
the February 11 issue of Hyurriet, Gul gave an extremely profound
sign to Mamediarov, emphasizing the following: “Azerbaijan is the
friend and the fraternal country for both Turks of Turkey and those
living in Cyprus. The step we take will serve as a good example for
other countries.”

Reminding of the international isolation of the Turkish republic
of Northern Cyprus, Gul told Mamediarov to call for the Azeris to
display their fraternal feeling and attitude towards the Turks of
Cyprus and added: “We are looking forward to the step you take.” In
other words, Gul demanded the recognition of the Republic of Northern
Cyprus from the Azeris against their decision to keep blocked the
Armenian-Turkish border.

By Hakob Chakrian

–Boundary_(ID_0AFeOFydaAWOgwumLte2zg)–

Lebanon: A Cedar Revolution to Counter Russian Missiles For Damascus

Lebanon: A Cedar Revolution to Counter Russian Missiles For Damascus
By K Gajendra Singh

Al-Jazeera.Info, USA
Feb 18 2005

Al-Jazeerah, February 18, 2005

The US attempt to organize a franchised ‘Cedar’ revolution in Lebanon
, like the Orange revolution in Ukraine and the Rose revolution in
Georgia , is to counter Moscow’s return into Middle East . Russia
would be soon delivering short range missiles to Damascus , to ease
US pressure in Ukraine , Georgia and elsewhere . The sale of missiles
to Syria was finalized during Syrian President Basher Assad’s recent
visit to Moscow. But it could ignite the most inflammable tinderbox
in the region , Lebanon ,which saw its polity and economy stabilised
and rebuilt over the last 15 years following a 15 years of civil war
from 1976 .The consequences would be horrendous . The mayhem of the
civil war had added ‘Lebanonisation’ to the lexicon
Following the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Shafiq
Hariri in Beirut on 14 February , almost spontaneous demonstrations ,
outcries followed by quick US actions like recall of its Ambassador
from Damascus , which has been blamed for the bomb blasts killing
Harari , by innuendo , implication and even directly by some US
lawmakers, as usual cheer led by US led corporate media , looks too
familiar , coming as it does when Russia is to transfer low range
missiles to Damascus .

The organized spontaneity and the cacophony of opposition noises in
Lebanon look like other recent franchised revolutions , in Georgia
and in Ukraine , apart from overthrow of Milosevic in Serbia. While
Europe Union openly sided with USA in the orange revolution in
Ukraine , which will adversely affect its relations with Russia ,this
time France , a former colonial power in Syria and Lebanon joined
Washington,
“If Syria was involved, the move would represent an act of
uncharacteristically brazen recklessness on the part of a regime
instinctively cautious in matters involving its own survival.”, said
Time magazine .Having spent decades in the region the author knows
the Syrians to be sophisticated operators .By having a hand in the
killing of Hariri Syria would not like to commit Harakiri , now under
daily pressure from US and Israel , the latter intrudes into its
sovereign air space and occupies its Golan Heights since 1967
war.,President Assad condemned Hariri’s killing as a “horrible
terrorist act,” but that did not dim the ire of Lebanese opposition
groups and the Bush administration.Syrian forces first arrived in
Beirut in 1976, eventually enforcing a fragile peace between rival
Lebanese factions and armed Palestinian refugees, and running the
country as Syria’s backyard ever since. It now keeps about 15,000
troops in the Beka’a valley. Fresh Lebanese elections are scheduled
for May, and Hariri was under mounting pressure to take the lead in
an opposition campaign to rally a vote for ousting Syrian troops.
Attempts are being made to unite all anti-Syrian factions which
fought a devastating civil war between 1975 and 1990. Christians,
Druze, and Shia and Sunni Muslims were in the funeral procession
numbering in over a hundred thousand . The US assistant secretary of
state, William Burns, who attended the funeral, said Hariri’s death
must give renewed impetus to achieving a free, independent and
sovereign Lebanon, and “what that means is the complete and immediate
withdrawal by Syria of all of its forces in Lebanon”.
The US, with the backing of France, pushed through UN Security
Council resolution 1559 in September, calling on Syria to withdraw
its troops. Jacques Chirac, the French president, a personal friend
of Hariri, flew to Beirut to offer his condolences. He praised Hariri
for his fight for democracy and independence. Lebanon government has
resisted pressure for an international investigation on the murder,
but has invited Swiss explosives experts to help.
Resolution 1559 has been strenuously resisted not only by Syria, but
also by the pro-Damascus Lebanese authorities, particularly President
Emile Lahoud. The White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, said that
Hariri’s murder was “an attempt to stifle these efforts to build an
independent, sovereign Lebanon, free of foreign domination.” Eyes are
now turned to the Security Council to see if a new resolution is
passed, perhaps imposing more sanctions on Syria.. Russia is angry
with US and will not cooperate nor would perhaps China.

President Assad’s extension of Lahoud’s mandate last September –
triggered the confrontation between Syria and the opposition – is
seen as a sign of firmness in facing up to American and French
pressures. Lebanese government officials and Syrian allies have
accused the opposition of being in the pocket of the United States
and Israel.

It appears that Hariri was leaning toward formally joining the
opposition, which he had hesitated to do. Apart from having in the
most prominent Lebanese Sunni, widening the opposition front’s
multi-sectarian base; it would also have brought Hariri’s ample purse
to support opposition in the elections next spring. “Hariri was the
natural cornerstone of a post-Syrian-withdrawal shadow
government.”BBC re-telecast a “Hard Talk” interview after 11
September, 2001 in which Hariri refused to declare Hizbullah a
terrorist organization and instead declared Israel an enemy.Syria has
cultivated politicians from all ends of the sectarian divide, and
controlling Lebanon’s own intelligence and security services. More
than visions of historic “Greater Syria” concept” there are certainly
economic benefits for Syria to maintain control over its economically
dynamic neighbor whose progress and integration into the world
economy puts Syria’s own decrepit economy to shame. But Lebanon’s
primary importance to Damascus is its value as a strategic trump
card. The organizing principle of Syrian foreign policy over the past
four decades has been to find ways of pressuring Israel to return the
Golan Heights, occupied by Israel since the war of 1967. Syria’s
presence in Lebanon, and particularly its support for the Iran-backed
Hezbollah militia, became its key strategic bargaining chips with
Israel, its Lebanese proxies have posed a constant security on
Israel’s northern border for the past quarter century. Losing Lebanon
would strip a regime already dangerously isolated within the Arab
world of the last of its leverage in dealing with Israel. “said Time
magazine.The U.N. Security Council approved a statement urging the
Lebanese government to “bring to justice the perpetrators, organizers
and sponsors of this heinous terrorist act.” Lebanon’s interior
minister suggested a suicide bomber aided by “international parties”
may have been behind it.
Apart from a rogue Syrian intelligence operatives, even factions
among Lebanon’s myriad religious groups have been accused . Lebanese
authorities have described responsibility claims by previously
unknown Islamic militants as not credible.
In Washington for meetings with Vice President Dick Cheney and Ms
Rice, the Egyptian foreign minister, Ahmed About Gheit, said “it is
still premature to reach conclusions” about Hariri’s assassination.
Speaking at the Brookings Institution thinktank, Gheit said he hoped
it would not touch off a cycle of killings and push Lebanon into
civil war.
Real reason –Russian Misssiles for Syria ;On 16 February , Moscow
confirmed that it will sell a new air defence missile system to
Syria, overlooking Israeli concern followed by US objections. It said
it was only for close-range use and would not upset the balance of
military forces in the Middle East. The system would be mounted on
vehicles and could not be stripped down for man-portable
shoulder-launch use. “This type of system is not mobile, these are
not man-portable anti-aircraft systems, and without special means of
transport their use is impossible,” a Russian official said. He also
repeated Moscow’s recent denials of any plans to sell longer-range
tactical Iskander missiles to Syria, which could reach any target in
Israel , including its nuclear reactor Dimona.
“Negotiations are now taking place on delivery to Damascus of the
Strelets close-range anti-air system,” Interfax news agency quoted an
unnamed senior defence ministry official.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said at a news conference on 16
February in Jerusalem that Israel was informed by Russia that a sale
of weapons to Syria would go ahead despite Israeli objections. “We
worry about that and we don’t think that that should have happened,”
he added .
Russian President Vladimir Putin said last month that the sale would
not upset the balance of power in the Middle East and that it
involved equipment that could solely be used for defensive purposes.
He said in an interview with daily the Jerusalem Post that “we won’t
bring to the region weapons that can be used by terrorists or that
can be transferred to terrorists without controls.”
Another country , Afghanistan also had foreign soldiers , which the
US led West and conservative Muslim regimes went to oust in 1979 and
to establish democracy .That country lies destroyed and shattered ,
even though the Soviet Russian troops left in 1989 .In came Talebans
and Al Qaida which stunned USA on September 11 , 2001 .Elections were
recently held in Afghanistan , over which US President George W, Bush
crowed , without “convincing” many except his media brain washed
supporters in USA .These could be conducted only with help from
democrat Gen Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan , where the opposition is
up in arms against his keeping on the military uniform . Gen
Musharraf persuaded the Mujahddins , Talebans and war lords to let
elections be held . He was promptly rewarded by USA in hundreds of
US$ millions of aid.
US Reaction to Hariris’s Death;
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asked US allies to join in
pressurising Syria to end its presence in Lebanon and its support of
terrorism. She told the US Congress, if other countries “send Syria a
message” that its conduct is unacceptable, “then perhaps the Syrians
will start to worry more about their isolation . . . politically and
economically.” Rice said that the message sent by recalling the US
ambassador was “an important one, and we’ll see how they respond.”
She added that other measures were possible, saying, “We continue to
review what else we might do.” She did acknowledge that it was not
clear who was behind Hariri’s killing, but US administration argued
that Syria’s presence in Lebanon was responsible for such attacks.

The Syrians came in Damascus after an accord in 1976, while USA
invaded Syria’s neighbour Iraq against the wishes of the UN .It has
not given much convincing explanations for mayhem carried out in that
country . On Iraq , USA remains isolated , has shown little
accountability under Geneva conventions and the man who advised
ignoring the conventions will become like minister of interior in
other countries .
Ms Rice did admit that no other country imposed economic and trade
sanctions against Damascus, which the U.S. Congress did two years
ago. US threatened to impose more sanctions .But “there’s no doubt
that Syria is a big problem,” she told members of the Senate Foreign
Affairs Committee for 2006 budget discussions. Both Republicans and
Democrats on the committee told Rice that the United States should be
forceful in its dealings with Damascus. “I urge you not to let Syria
off the hook,” said Sen. George Allen

But Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who grilled Rice during hearings ,
even questioning her integrity added a realty check .She said
Americans were told before the war on Iraq that U.S. allies would
help cover the cost of the mission, now estimated to total about $250
billion. In giving new aid to the coalition partners, including
Poland and Ukraine, “in essence, we’re paying them for what they
did,” Boxer said. “We were told there would be financial burden
sharing; and at the end of the day, there isn’t.”

Even the U.S. House of Representatives joined in condemning Syria (
as yet without any proof) , paid tribute to Rafik Hariri, and called
for Syria to withdraw troops from Lebanon. US troops are staying in
Iraq for stability not Syria’s in Lebanon.A resolution is under
consideration to honor Hariri but the session was devoted to
criticism of Syria’s continuing occupation of Lebanon. Another
Congressman recalled the demonstrations by Lebanese calling for
Syria’s withdrawal from Lebanon as the key issue for Lebanon. “There
is no proof that Syria was directly responsible for this
assassination,” he said. “But there is no doubt that Syria has
remained in Lebanon far longer either than their mandate, or than in
the agreements under the Taif Accords of 1989.”Congressman Eliot
Engel, who wrote the Syria Accountability Act Congress approved last
year imposing sanctions on Damascus, has urged the Bush
administration to ensure that the Syria Accountability Act is fully
implemented. That law calls on Syria, among other things, to halt
support for terrorism, end its occupation of Lebanon, and stop
development of any weapons of mass destruction and ballistic
missiles. “It is clear to me, although the evidence is being
gathered, but I suspect that this assassination has some ties to
Damascus, to the regime in Damascus,” he noted. “The Syrians have
allowed Lebanon to destablize, and this is part and parcel of the
result.During her safari the Europeans listened and clapped politely
to Ms Rice , but were hardly overwhelmed with the marketing of the
same US agenda , only less stridently than the boss. She might be
considered eloquent but hardly convincing .
Iran – Syria United Front ;
Iran and Syria threatened daily by the Bush administration and the
Israel government, on 16 February formed a mutual self-defence pact
to confront the “threats” facing them. This was announced after a
meeting in Tehran between the Iranian vice-president, Mohammed Reza
Aref, and the Syrian prime minister, Naji al-Otari.” At this
sensitive point, the two countries require a united front due to
numerous challenges,” said Otari. Aref added: “We are ready to help
Syria on all grounds to confront threats.” Syria and Iran have been
together in the past too .
Of course while US leaders make conflicting statements on Iran’s
nuclear program ,Israeli Foreign Minister, Silvan Shalom, speaking in
London predicted that Tehran would have the knowledge to produce a
nuclear weapon within six months. He said that Iran was preparing
nuclear weapons that would be able to target “London, Paris and
Madrid” by the end of the decade. “We believe the Iranians will never
abandon their dreams” of nuclear weapons, Shalom said. “It is not
Israel’s problem any more, it is the world’s problem.” It is a
strange statement coming from Israel , which reportedly has over 100
nuclear bombs.Historical Background;

When the armies of Islam erupted from the Arabian desert and carved
an empire from the Atlantic to China in the 7th Century , Lebanon
with its mountains provided refuge for persecuted Christian and
Muslim sects alike. After Ottomans annexed the caliphate and
guardianship of Mecca and Medina in 16th century, the region became a
peaceful backwater until World War I. During Ottoman era Lebanon
evolved a social and political system of its own. Ottoman Aleppo or
Tripoli governed the north, Damascus the centre, and Sidon the south.
Coastal Lebanon and al-Biqah valley were usually ruled more directly
by Istanbul, while Mt. Lebanon enjoyed semiautonomous status.

But when Turkey sided with Germany in the First World War , Britain,
to protect its Indian possessions and the Suez Canal lifeline,
encouraged Arabs under Hashemite ruler Sharif Hussein of Hijaj to
revolt against the caliph in Istanbul (and deputed spy T E Lawrence
to help out). The war’s end did not bring freedom to the Arabs as
promised; because , at the same time, by secret Sykes-Picot
agreement, the British and French arbitrarily divided the sultan’s
Arab domains and their warring populations of Shi’ites, Sunnis,
Alawite Muslims, Druse, and Christians. The French took most of
greater Syria, dividing it into Syria and Christian-dominated
Lebanon. The British kept Palestine, Iraq and the rest of Arabia.

When Sharif Hussein’s son Emir Feisel arrived to claim Damascus,
Syria, the French chased him out. So the British installed him on the
Iraqi throne. When the other son, Emir Abdullah, turned up in Amman,
British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, dining in a Jerusalem
hotel, reportedly drew on a napkin the borders of a new Emirate of
Trans-Jordan, encompassing wasteland vaguely claimed by Syrians,
Saudis and Iraqis.

By the 1917 Balfour Declaration Britain had also promised a homeland
for Jews in Palestine. European Jews began emigrating to Palestine,
and the trickle became a flood with the rise of anti-Semitic policies
in Nazi Germany and elsewhere in Europe. After World War II, the
state of Israel, carved out of British Palestine, was not recognized
by the Arabs. The 1948 Arab-Israeli war allowed Israel to expand its
area, while Jordan annexed the West Bank and Egypt took over Gaza. In
the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel captured the West bank and Gaza and
Syria’s Golan heights. Thus were laid the foundations for most of the
problems of the region.

The contemporary state of Lebanon came into being in 1920 when
France, administered it as a League of Nations mandate. The
Maronites, strongly pro-French by tradition, welcomed this, and
during the next 20 years, while France held the mandate, the
Maronites were favoured. The expansion of prewar Lebanon into Greater
Lebanon, however, changed the balance of the population. Although the
Maronites were the largest single element, they no longer formed a
majority. The population was more or less equally divided between
Christians and Muslims, and a large section of it wanted neither to
be ruled by France nor to be part of an independent Lebanon, but
rather to join Syrian or an Arab state

Lebanon became a republic in 1926 and achieved independence in 1943.
Its rugged, mountainous terrain served throughout history as an
asylum for diverse religious and ethnic groups and for political
dissidents. The majority of Lebanese now are Muslims ,( with Shiite
the most numerous ) followed by Christians with Maronites the largest
group, Greek Orthodox and Greek Catholics , and Druzes and Armenians
and, even a very small minority of Jews. Lebanon is one of the most
densely populated countries in the Mediterranean area. It has one of
the highest rates of literacy.

Lebanon is a republic with a parliamentary system of government. Its
constitution, promulgated in 1926 during the French mandate was
modified by several subsequent amendments. According to the 1989 Taif
agreement, parliamentary seats are apportioned equally between
Christian and Muslim sects, thereby replacing an earlier ratio that
had favoured Christians. This sectarian distribution is also observed
in appointments to public office and jobs.

The head of state is the president, who is elected by a two-thirds
majority of the National Assembly for a term of six years and is
eligible for reelection only after the lapse of an additional six
years. By an unwritten convention, the president must be a Maronite
Christian, the premier a Sunnite Muslim, and the speaker of the
National Assembly a Shiite. The Cabinet members’ portfolios are
organized to reflect the sectarian balance and holds more executive
power than the president. It requires a vote of confidence from the
assembly. A Cabinet usually falls because of internal dissension,
societal strife, or pressure exerted by foreign states. The control
of the official central government is at best precarious; sectarian
militias and foreign countries exert great influence .

Lebanon has to grapple with internal problems of social and economic
organization, and also to struggle to define its position in relation
to Israel, to its Arab neighbours, and to Palestinian refugees living
in Lebanon. The Lebanese pluralistic communal structure eventually
collapsed under the pressures of this struggle. Communal rivalries
over political power became so exacerbated by the complex issues that
arose from the Palestinian question that a breakdown of the
governmental system resulted from an extremely damaging civil war
that began in 1975.

The civil war was a catastrophe for the Lebanese, whose country lay
in ruins. There seemed to be no compromise acceptable to the Muslims,
who numbered more than half the population, and to the Christians,
who were determined to keep their control of key government
institutions. Foreign intervention merely restrained open, full scale
warfare. Economic destruction was massive, but this was overcome to a
certain extent by increased remittances from Lebanese working abroad
during the boom years in the oil-producing countries.

Then Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 to eliminate Palestine Libration
Organisation (PLO) , a law into itself ., which had been expelled
from Jordan in early 1970s .PLO Chief Yasser Arafat had to leave
Beirut, but under the command and neglect of Defence Minister ,
thousands of helpless Palestinians , mostly women, children and old
men were butchered by Christian militia, Israel’s allies .
A year after the Israeli withdrawal in 1982 from southern Lebanon,
Hezbollah—Lebanon’s main resistance force in the region—refused to
consider that the country had regained its full sovereignty, since
Israel still controlled the Sheba farms enclave and had not released
all Lebanese prisoners of war, and Israeli warplanes patrolled
Lebanese skies at will.
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks in the U.S., Lebanon
tried to walk a tightrope. Lebanese officials were at pains to stress
their condemnation of the attacks against civilians, while at the
same time, they emphasized the distinction between terrorism and the
struggle for liberation. Bush’s statement for a Palestinian state was
welcomed by Lebanese officials, who were under international pressure
to naturalize about 330,000 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon . They
were uneasy, about Washington targeting Hezbollah for attack as a
terrorist organization.

In 1980s , the West had supported Iraq’s long war against Ayatollah
Khomeini’s Iran, and the US had granted loans to Baghdad worth
billions of dollars. For strategic reasons Syria sided with Iran .But
in 1990-91 Gulf War , Syria along with most of the Arab world and
Turkey joined Papa Bush coalition for various reasons , Iraq’s
invasion of Kuwait, money , cutting Saddam Hussein down to size ,
when Iraq at great human and money cost had stopped Khomeini’s
Shiite revolution from expanding in the Arab world .Ironically ,
Shiite of Iraq have now become a major force after 30 January
elections in Iraq . In both US led wars against Iraq, Israel and
unwittingly Iran have gained .
This article was submitted by the author for publication at
Al-Jazeerah on Feb 17, 2005. It was also published by Saag.com.

–Boundary_(ID_a5ZhVvPiBhgOl119smjdhA)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Catholic dioceses pass check for abuse

Catholic dioceses pass check for abuse
By Cheryl Wetzstein
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Washington Times
Feb 18 2005

More than 95 percent of Roman Catholic dioceses in the United States
passed an audit last year on how they are working to protect children
from clergy sexual abuse, about an 8 percent improvement over 2003, a
new report by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) says.
Auditing teams, often comprising former FBI agents, found that
187 of 194 dioceses met the standards established in 2002, including
the Diocese of Arlington, the only local diocese to fail the first
audit conducted in 2003. Eighteen other dioceses failed the first
audit.

But, “the crisis is not over,” church officials said yesterday at
a D.C. news conference, as 1,092 new sex-abuse accusations, including
22 from minors, were lodged against 756 Catholic priests and deacons
in 2004.
While more than half of the accused clergy already are dead and
had been named in other complaints, “over 300 of the reports received
in 2004 identified alleged abusers not previously known,” said
Kathleen McChesney, executive director of the Office of Child and
Youth Protection in the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB).
What is over, said Miss McChesney, “is the denial that this
problem exists” and “the reluctance of the church to deal openly with
the public about the nature and extent of the problem.”
Clergy sex-abuse victims yesterday said they were not relieved by
the report because it doesn’t measure effectiveness in reducing abuse
and it leaves too much power with the bishops.
Before the sex-abuse scandal broke in 2002, “each bishop was in
charge of handling sex abuse in his diocese. Today, each bishop
essentially still is,” said David Clohessy, Barbara Blaine and other
leaders of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP).
“How can anyone really believe things have changed much” when the
upper ranks of the church remain essentially intact, they said.
USCCB President Bishop William Skylstad thanked “those who have
come forward after suffering such abuse.”
“We will never fully understand your suffering, but you have
helped us to confront this most serious problem and take the
necessary steps to rid the church of it,” he said.
The 2004 audit, conducted by the Gavin Group of Boston, reviewed
194 Catholic dioceses to assess their compliance with a “charter for
the protection of children and young people.” The charter was created
nearly three years ago by church leaders in the wake of
clergy-sex-abuse cases in Boston.
Some 4,392 priests have been accused of molesting minors in
10,667 cases between 1950 and 2002. Earlier this month, defrocked
priest Paul Shanley was sentenced to 12 to 15 years in prison for
raping a boy in the 1980s.
The bishops have already authorized a third national audit.
The Catholic Church last year paid $157.8 million in settlements,
legal fees and victim and offender therapy, and another $20.2 million
for child protection efforts, Miss McChesney said.
Highlights of the report are:
•The bulk of the new 1,092 abuseaccusations began or occurred in
the 1960s and 1970s; fewer than 20 occurred since 2000.
•Seventy-eight percent of the victims were male. Most were
between the age of 10 and 14 when the abuse began.
•Of the offenders, 550, or 72 percent, were either dead,
defrocked or removed from public ministry before the newest
accusations were received.
The seven dioceses that failed to pass all the standards in 2004
were those in Burlington, Vt.; Fresno, Calif.; Wheeling-Charleston,
W.Va.; and Youngstown, Ohio; as well as the Apostolic Exarchate for
Armenian Catholics in New York, Eparchy of St. Thomas the Apostle in
El Cajon, Calif.; and Eparchy of Newton, Mass., Melkite-Greek
Catholic.
The Diocese of Lincoln, Neb., was not included in the list
because the bishop did not participate in the process.

–Boundary_(ID_OKWy40uZNCZlYe/WDL361A)–

Glendale: Understanding Lebanese Armenians

Understanding Lebanese Armenians
By ANI AMIRKHANIAN

Glendale News Press
Feb 19 2005

Third in a three-part series.

In the past weeks I have been looking at the relationships between
Armenian sub-groups. Now, I want to turn my attention to the Lebanese
Armenians, the last sub-group I will be discussing in this series.
Like the other two Armenian sub-groups, the Lebanese Armenian community
is isolated in its own enclave and members tend to group with their
“own kind.”

Perhaps the most distinguishing characteristic, in my opinion, about
Lebanese Armenians or “Arevmedahyes,” as they are known, is their
very distinctive dialect. Although the other groups speak in their
own dialects, the Lebanese Armenian dialect varies the most from the
other two.

I cannot remember a time when the three groups ever came together for
a mutual goal. There has always been a divide among the sub-groups
regarding their actions and understanding.

Lebanese-Armenians have always seemed to me to be the more “patriotic”
and most proud Armenians of their culture. That is not to say
that the other two groups are not proud of their heritage, but the
Lebanese-Armenian community has always been involved with activism
and progressive politics.

I recently spoke with a Lebanese Armenian college friend of mine
named Natalie who shared with me some of her observations about the
sub-groups and their relationship to each other.

“I always thought that Arevmedahyes and Barskahyes [Iranian-Armenians]
which are both Spurkahyes [Diaspora Armenians] got along but were
both doing their own thing to benefit the Armenians acculturating as
opposed to assimilating in the U.S.,” Natalie said.

She said “own thing” referring to both groups working separately but
for the same cause. Natalie also said that the different dialects and
cultural differences of the two groups has fueled these Armenians to
go about upholding the Armenian culture in their own way — separately.

Historically, Barskahyes and Lebanese-Armenians have had a positive
relationship even though they have gone about their own ways —
knowing they were striving to succeed for a common cause.

I do agree with Natalie’s thoughts about these sub-groups, but what
strikes me the most is that they still remain apart and have yet to
establish long-term relationships outside of community and cultural
activism. What keeps them apart in particular is their language or
dialectical disparity.

The dialects of the Barskahye and Arevmedahye sub-groups are on two
separate ends of the spectrum. I also asked Natalie what she thinks
about the relationship between Lebanese-Armenians and Hayastansis.
She said it is one where they intermingle and get along, but what
sets them apart from Lebanese-Armenians and even Barskahyes is their
mind-set.

The former groups are “more westernized in their train of thought,
since they did not grow up under the controlled government of
communism, as Hayastansis did,” Natalie said.

Another Lebanese-Armenian I spoke with, my cousin-in-law Hrant,
also agreed that the sub-groups are more cooperative and have just
got used to each other. Hrant said he had difficulty in the past
understanding the Barskahye dialect.

“I remember when I first came to the U.S. my only real problem was
understanding my sister’s Barskahye friends,” Hrant said. “But then
I mostly figured out their dialect.”

He also said that as a Lebanese-Armenian, he has noticed that the
sub-groups intermarry a lot more. For example, more Barskahye women
are marrying Lebanese-Armenian men.

Despite greater interaction between all three sub-groups, there is
yet still a divide when it comes to “intimate socializing,” he said.

“Most people still prefer to be with their own group,” said Hrant.
“Language, happens to be a prominent reason why Armenians in general
stick with their ‘own kind.'”

There is no denying that to coexist, language plays an important
role with the Armenian sub-groups. The only time when language is
not an issue is when Armenians of any sub-group speak in English,
which in turn the subject of disparity among the sub-groups fades out.

It seems unusual that when Armenian sub-groups speak another language
other than their own, they all become “Armenian” as one group. The
disparity becomes irrelevant.

So then does belonging to a sub-group give people a sense of a more
focused identity?

According to Hrant, “Time still tends to blend everything together
… ”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: NATO Special Envoy to Visit Armenia

NATO Special Envoy to Visit Armenia

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Feb 19 2005

AssA-Irada 19/02/2005 13:33

Robert Simons, NATO Secretary General’s special envoy on South
Caucasus and Central Asia, is scheduled to visit Armenia on February
23-24. While in Yerevan, Simons will represent the NATO liason officer
Romuldas Razhooks.

The two NATO representatives visited Georgia and Azerbaijan early
in February. Simons said in Baku said that “NATO is studying the
situation around Nagorno Karabakh, but “the alliance does not intend
to act as an intermediary in this process”.

BAKU: Azeri, Armenian Foreign Ministers to Continue ‘Prague Talks’ i

Azeri, Armenian Foreign Ministers to Continue ‘Prague Talks’ in March

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Feb 19 2005

AssA-Irada 19/02/2005 12:17

The next meeting of the Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign ministers
Elmar Mammadyarov and Vardan Oskanian will be held in Prague on March
2, Oskanian said in a meeting with his Russian counterpart Sergey
Lavrov on Thursday.

The Armenian diplomat noted that the Prague talks have raised
optimism of the conflicting sides for solving the Nagorno Karabakh
problem.

Lavrov, in turn, expressed a hope that the Prague meetings of the
Armenian and Azerbaijani ministers would help both sides reach common
agreement. The Russian official called the OSCE Minsk Group “the most
optimal and continuous format” in the conflict settlement.