Saakashvili Pledges Jobs to Locals in Akhalkalaki after Base Pullout

Civil Georgia
April 28 2005

Saakashvili Pledges Jobs to Locals in Akhalkalaki after Base Pullout

28/04/2005 20:36

Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili said on April 28 while meeting
with visiting Chairman of the Armenian Parliament Artur Bagdasarian
that Tbilisi plans to implement new social rehabilitation program for
those ethnic Armenians, who face unemployment after the pullout of
Russian military base from Akhalkalaki, a town in Georgia’s
south-western region of Samtskhe-Javakheti.

`We do not intend to open a new military unit there [instead of
Russian military base]; though those [residents of Akhalkalaki, who
are currently employed in the Russian military base] who wish can be
employed at other Georgian military bases. For others, who do not
wish to stay in the army, we will develop a separate employment
programs, business-oriented projects,’ Saakashvili said.

In March, residents of Akhalkalaki, which is predominately populated
by ethnic Armenians, held a protest rally twice and spoke against
withdrawal of Russian military base stationed there.

Turkey’s wilful forgetting

Age, Australia
April 28 2005

Turkey’s wilful forgetting
April 29, 2005

If Turkey wants to be part of the EU it must be prepared to face up
to its history.

‘Who remembers today the Armenians?” Adolf Hitler is reputed to have
said as he prepared to invade Poland. Ninety years after the killing
of up to 1.5 million Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World War I
many people do still remember – most of all the descendants of those
who were murdered. In April 1915 Turkish soldiers arrested hundreds
of Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople,
then tortured and executed them. The Ottoman authorities then ordered
the mass expulsion of Armenians from eastern Anatolia, where they
were suspected of working with Russia to create a separate state. The
slaughter of Armenians continued over the next several years.
Terrible atrocities were carried out, even against children. This has
become known as the first genocide of the 20th century. What has kept
bitterness alive is Turkey’s insistence that no genocide ever took
place, although it admits many thousands of people died as a result
of “civil strife”.

Advertisement
AdvertisementNow the Armenians are seeking international recognition
that their people were victims of a deliberate campaign of
extermination. One thing gives hope they might achieve this: Turkey’s
desire to become part of the European Union. France, which is one of
15 countries to recognise the Armenian genocide, has called on Turkey
to set the record straight before it can join the EU. The Turkish
Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has recently proposed a joint
Turkish and Armenian commission to investigate the genocide claims.
The proposal is welcome, even though its critics say most of the
incriminating evidence has been expunged from the Turkish archives.

Turkey has been guilty of wilful amnesia. Germany has managed to
reinstate itself as a responsible international citizen because of
its recognition of, and contrition for, its Nazi past. Japan is
belatedly realising the importance of properly apologising for its
wartime atrocities. Turkey wants to be seen as moderate and
progressive, fit to be part of Europe, and to that end it has
instituted significant social and human rights reforms. But if it is
to be permitted to join the EU it must be prepared to own up to its
past. As history shows, victims do not forget, and forgiveness is not
possible before an acknowledgement of the wrongs committed.

ANKARA: Council of Europe Calls Armenia to Accept Turkish Call

Journal of Turkish Weekly
April 28 2005

Council of Europe Calls Armenia to Accept Turkish Call

JTW – Members of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE)
are expressing support for Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan’s recent suggestion to Armenian President Robert Kocharian
that the two sides establish a joint commission to study the
historical disputes between Turkey and Armenia.
Speaking to Turkish news channel NTV on Tuesday, European Council
General Secretary Terry Davis described Tayyip Erdogan’s overture as
“a very good idea.”

Calling the joint investigation by Turkish and Armenian historians a
“reasonable undertaking,” Davis said that Erdogan had made a
“positive gesture.” “I see Erdogan’s suggestion as a positive gesture
towards understanding these historical events in order to attain to a
common perspective, and I support it,” he added.

PACE calls on Kocharian to accept Erdogan’s overture

News of the Council of Europe’s support for Erdogan’s joint
commission came earlier this week from the institution’s
Parliamentary Assembly.

Some 80 assembly members signed on Monday a written statement during
a general assembly meeting in Strasbourg that called on Kocharian to
accept Erdogan’s proposition.
PACE had named Armenia as aggressive and occupier country in the
Caucasus. Armenian forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijani
territories for more than a decade and Armenia rejects all calls to
withdraw.

KOCHARIAN SUGGESTS INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMISSION

Armenian President Ropert Kocharian replied last week to Erdogan’s
letter by putting forth a very different option. “The political
atmosphere should be prepared for dialogue,” Kocharian said. He
proposed the formation of an intergovernmental commission to study
all the problems between the two countries. However Turkish side
found the Armenian reply `tricky’. According to Ankara, Kocharian
tries to manipulate the Turkish call. Turkey and Armenia has no
diplomatic relations. Ankara asks Armenia to withdraw its armies from
Azerbaijan and recognize Turkey’s national borders.

Compiled by Jan SOYKOK,

ANKARA: Politics Defeated By History

Turkish Press
April 28 2005

Politics Defeated By History

Can Dundar, a columnist in Milliyet daily comments on the recent
developments between Turkey and Armenia regarding the Armenian claims
of genocide in his article titled ”Politics Defeated by History.”

Dundar writes in his article that Turkey has recently changed its
policy on Turkish-Armenian dispute and comments that ”at last Turkey
has realized that it can’t stay deaf to the Armenian genocide claims
voiced in the world, anymore.”

”Turkey has launched a counter attack against those claims, started
to re-scan all of its archives and publish many documents on the
issue,” Dundar says, approving those initiatives of Turkey.

Referring to the reply of Armenian President Kocharian to Prime
Minister Erdogan’s letter, Dundar says ”in his reply to Erdogan’s
proposal (of forming a joint commission) Kocharian said this would be
leaving the responsibility of bilateral relations to historians; and
instead, he proposed first of all to have normal diplomatic relations
between the two countries. Erdogan replied to that, saying ‘we should
first sort out the historical problems’, urging Armenia to open all
of its archives.”

Dundar comments in his article that ”these remarks of the two
leaders show that Turkey and Armenia changed their earlier positions.
Armenians, who had earlier urged Turkey to recognize the so-called
genocide first to normalize diplomatic relations, now wants to have
diplomatic relations with Turkey first and deal with the genocide
issue later. Turkey argues the contrary now.”

Dundar says this new policy (or counter attack) of Turkey has some
problems, too. ”Turkey’s thesis of denying the genocide allegations
by investigating and publishing historical documents doesn’t stop
various countries’ parliaments from adopting ‘so-called genocide
resolutions’ one after another. However Ankara still try to comfort
itself saying that President Bush hasn’t mentioned the word
‘genocide,’ but just used the word ‘massacre’ in his speech on April
24th. Turkey, which is far more behind Armenians in lobbying, can’t
be successful in this new policy.”

”What is more important is that Ankara which has the chance of
eliminating or at least decreasing the influence of Armenian diaspora
by having direct relations with Yerevan, turns down this chance and
pushes Yerevan to assume the same stance as the Diaspora,” Dundar
says.

”Challenge can sometimes be a good tactic in foreign policy, but a
permanent method that can yield fruitful results is to take brave
steps and prevent the past from being an obstacle for the future.
Starting diplomatic relations and opening border gates will both
start dialogue between the two peoples, and it will also decrease the
pressure of the world on Turkey. We need politicians who can take the
risk of a new start,” Dundar summarizes his views in the last
paragraph of his article.

Chess legend Kasparov to ‘Post’: Double-check Putin!

Jerusalem Post, Israel
April 28 2005

Chess legend Kasparov to ‘Post’: Double-check Putin!
By SAM SER

As Russian President Vladimir Putin spent his first full day here on
Thursday, legendary chess champion Garry Kasparov had a message for
Israel: Don’t trust him!

In a telephone interview with The Jerusalem Post from Russia,
Kasparov, who has retired from chess and is now a political rival of
the president’s, complained that Putin’s regime is trampling on
democratic principles and poses a serious threat to the rest of the
world. He also said that Putin’s reliance on support from
ultranationalist forces could spell trouble for Russia’s Jews, and he
skewered Putin for strategic shortcomings that, he said, could
imperil Israel.

Russian sales of missiles to Syria and nuclear technology to Iran,
for example, were misguided steps that should worry not only Israel,
Kasparov said. Actually, he continued, they were proof that Putin and
his regime “just want a short-term profit” and that they “don’t think
strategically, they can’t think long-term.”

The Russian president had undermined democratic reforms installed by
his predecessors, Kasparov added, citing strict controls on
independent media and suggestions that Putin might force an
alteration to the constitution that would allow him to remain in
office for a third term.

Kasparov also claimed that Putin was not only doing too little to
combat the rising ant-Semitism in Russia, but charged that the former
KGB officer’s government even encouraged and instigated
ultranationalist sentiment, with the security apparatus propping up
far-right groups.

“The only way to win support from the West is to make sure that
everyone is scared of the threat of ultranationalist forces… so
Putin presents himself as the only one who can stop them,”

Kasparov said. Parties such as Nashi, a pro-Putin “version of the
brown-shirts,” he said, create provocations that give the Russian
president “a legal chance to use military forces in Russian streets.”

Attacking Putin is part of Kasparov’s first foray into politics, as a
leader of the liberal opposition group Committee 2008: Free Choice,
since giving up professional chess in March. The 42-year-old is
widely considered the game’s best player ever.

For years, though, Kasparov – originally named Gari Weinstein after
his Jewish father, he took on a Russian version of his Armenian
mother’s maiden name as a teen after his father died – has been an
outspoken supporter of Israel in the international arena. He has
visited the country several times, especially to strengthen the Tel
Aviv chess club established in his name.

Kasparov told The Post he believed that Israel’s Russian immigrant
population should speak out to draw the West’s attention to the
dangers that Putin’s regime poses.

“Western leaders don’t care at all about Putin and [his record on]
democracy as long as he can provide them with some sort of stability
in Russia,” he said, “but Putin is not providing stability at all.
The Chechen war is spreading, with Islamists joining what was once a
nationalist separatist fight, and increasing terrorism
dramatically… so Russia is actually less safe today than it was
before” Putin took office.

He also criticized the economic performance of Putin’s government,
saying that the economy was precariously dependent on high oil prices
and was growing too slowly, and that the government “has proven it is
incapable of using oil profits to solve social problems.”

“They are simply postponing all the key problems that Russia is
facing today, because they don’t know how to deal with them,”
Kasparov said.
Further, Kasparov said, the targeting of wealthy businessmen, such as
former Yukos magnate Mikhail Khodorkovsky, is an attempt by Putin and
his associates to control the country’s capital.

“The attack on Yukos is an attack against free business in Russia,”
he said. “Khodorkovsky is in jail not because he didn’t pay taxes,
but because he was ready to pay taxes… because he was paying his
money to the Treasury, and not to Kremlin bosses. Unwillingness to
cooperate with KGB rule is the key reason behind the [legal] attack.”

“Even the czarist regimes were more legitimate and more productive
for the interests of Russia” than Putin’s regime, he said.

Leveling such sharp criticism at Putin from within Russia could be
dangerous. Indeed, several Yukos partners who have fled to Israel
claim that they were targeted for prosecution by Putin because of
their vocal political opposition to the government.

Being half-Jewish, Kasparov would be eligible to make aliya should he
find himself under similar or even worse threats.

“I don’t even want to discuss a situation in which I would be forced
to leave my native country,” he said. “I doubt I would ever have to
leave… but I would consider all possibilities.”

Turkey removes barrier to Swiss arms imports

Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Switzerland
April 28 2005

Turkey removes barrier to Swiss arms imports

Switzerland is expected to begin selling arms to Turkey again for the
first time since it introduced tight restrictions on exports to the
country in 1992.

The Turkish government on Thursday ended its boycott of Swiss arms,
one month after Switzerland lifted its embargo.

The Swiss government introduced the restrictions in 1992 at the
height of the Turkish-Kurdish conflict. Since then, the authorities
have only approved exports of handguns and rifles designed for
self-defence or sport.

When it lifted the restrictions last month, the Swiss authorities
said the situation in Turkey had improved significantly, particularly
at the institutional level, and that the move was in line with the
European Union’s policy towards Ankara.

The foreign ministry welcomed Turkey’s announcement on Thursday,
which paves the way for Switzerland to bid for lucrative defence
contracts with the Turkish army.

EU states have already begun selling arms to Turkey again, approving
?780 million of weapons exports to Turkey in 2003.

Divergent opinions
In praise of Turkey’s decision, the Swiss foreign ministry said
Ankara was showing “an open spirit and great tolerance for the
divergent opinions of other states”.

A visit to Turkey at the end of March by the foreign minister,
Micheline Calmy-Rey, was also key to improving bilateral ties.

Calmy-Rey discussed economic relations, human rights and the Armenian
question with Turkish leaders.

Relations soured two years ago when the parliament in the Swiss
canton of Vaud voted to recognise the massacre of Armenians in 1915
as genocide.

According to Turkey’s Hurriyet newspaper, Austria and Sweden were
also removed from the Turkish government’s “red list”.

The newspaper said it was a necessary step for Turkey since it has
opened talks with Brussels on EU membership.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Armenia Gives Cautious Reply to Turkish Offer for Study

Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
April 28 2005

Armenia Gives Cautious Reply to Turkish Offer for Study of Historical
Claims

Jan SOYKOK – Armenia says it could take part in a commission with
Turkey to study decades-old Armenian allegations.

Armenian President Robert Kocharian said the proposal would only work
if the two countries improve bilateral relations. The neighbors share
a border, but have no diplomatic ties. Armenian does not recognise
Turkey’s national borders and Armenia continue to occupy 20 percent
of Azerbaijan territories.

Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul earlier this month said Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan made the offer in a letter to the
Armenian president.

Turkey has refused to establish diplomatic ties with Armenia because
of Armenian occupation and Armenian irredentist declarations against
Turkey and Azerbaijain. Moreover the Armenian campaign to gain
international recognition of the World War One killings as genocide
damages Turkish-Armenian relations. Hundred thousands of Turkish and
Armenians were killed during the First World War. The armed Armenian
groups killed about 523,000 Turkish and Kurdish and many Armenians
died at the same period. Armenians call the 1915 events genocide
while Turks accuse the Armenians of comming massacres against the
Muslims.

Armenian Ottomans in the eastern provinces rioted against Istanbul in
order to establish a separate Armenia, but they failed.

Baby jumbo to stay put

Deccan Herald, India
April 28 2005

Baby jumbo to stay put

DH News Service Bangalore:

India’s gift to Armenia, a four-year-old elephant, will not be
delivered, thanks to sustained agitation by animal rights activists
and the timely intervention of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on
Wednesday.

But perhaps the happiest are the caretakers of Veda, the female
elephant, at Bannerghatta Biological Park on Thursday. The
announcement that Veda will be sent to the Yerevan Zoo to mate with a
sole male elephant housed there had created an uproar in December
2004. Animal rights activists, globally, protested against the move,
as they feared that Veda’s life will be put in danger due to sub-zero
temperatures prevailing there.

`Veda is not going anywhere. We received official confirmation from
New Delhi through a fax on Thursday. As these agreements were
happening in diplomatic levels, we had very little say. But now we
are happy that Veda will continue to live in the familiar environs of
the Park,’ said Deputy Conservator of Forests, BBP, Mr Markandaiah.

ANKARA: Baykal okayed Erdogan’s proposal to Kocharian

Turkish Press
April 28 2005

Baykal Okayed Erdogan’s Proposal To Kocharian

ANTALYA – Deniz Baykal, the leader of the main opposition Republican
People’s Party (CHP), qualified the proposal made by Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to Armenian President Robert Kocharian
(to form a joint committee comprised of historians of the two
countries to examine the archives) as positive.

Baykal told A.A correspondent, ”this proposal is the common proposal
of CHP and the government. And, I think some developments may occur
in coming days.”

”We are ready to open our archives, and we are not evading from the
realities of the past. We want this topic be researched,” said
Baykal.

Baykal added that Turkish citizens living in Europe should be
informed, and take action against the initiatives in these countries
aiming at recognizing the so-called Armenian genocide allegations.

ANKARA: Prof. Ozdemir: We Want To Discuss Events Of 1915 With Our…

Turkish Press
April 28 2005

Prof. Dr. Ozdemir: We Want To Discuss Events Of 1915 With Our

ANKARA – Turkish Institute of History (TTK) Armenian Studies Chairman
Prof. Dr. Hikmet Ozdemir said on Thursday that they wanted to discuss
the events of 1915 with their interlocutors.

Speaking at a conference on ”the Past, Today and Future of
Turkish-Armenian Conflict” at the Anadolu Agency (A.A), Ozdemir
said, ”the Relocation Law and ensuing developments are not enough to
explain the conflict between Turks and Armenians. The atmosphere in
which the law was approved, international developments and conditions
of the Ottoman Empire should be well-known to this end. Some
documents revealed that a map prepared by Britain, France and Russia
in 1914 had envisaged separation of the Empire before the World War
I.”

”Britons had made many propaganda together with media and scientists
to gain support of the United States during the World War I. Some
special news reports had been made up to incite the Christian world.
We should clean such propaganda of Britain in order to enlighten the
events of 1915. We want to discuss those events with our
interlocutors. We have already accepted the risk of results of such a
study,” he said.

Ozdemir stressed that it was impossible to understand parliaments of
some countries which accepted resolutions without conducting a
detailed research.

”The Relocation Law was nothing but a measure taken by the Ottoman
Empire to prevent an uprising. As a result of Armenian uprisings,
hundreds of thousands of Armenians and security forces had been
killed. Those Armenians had been militants of Tashnak and Hinchakian
committees. Due to ongoing wars, the Ottoman Empire had to protect
the roads of military supply. The military officials in the eastern
region had requested the government to transfer the armed Armenians
to another place for the security of those routes,” he said.

”According to the first scenario, transfer of Armenians to Caucasus
had been envisaged. However, the Ottoman government had decided to
send them to Syria (which was then Ottoman territory). If they had
been sent to Caucasus, it would have been an exile. The decision had
conformed to the Constitution and the law. If the Ottoman Empire had
targeted to make the population in Anatolia Turk, it would have sent
Armenians to Caucasus. On the other hand, Turks had also suffered
during the World War I. Turks in Caucasus had been exiled from
Caucasus to Anatolia. It had been nothing, but crisis management,”
he said.

Noting that the Ottoman Empire had put into force a series of
instructions to meet requirements of migrants, Ozdemir said,
”however, no one can say that those instructions had been fully
applied under war conditions. During those days, hundreds of
thousands of people died because of epidemics in Anatolia. Turks have
never been cherished revenge against anyone.”

Stressing that Armenians who had been forced to migrate in 1915,
returned later under a decision of the government, Ozdemir said,
”however, they returned as officers in the French Army, and
massacred their neighbors in Adana, Antep and Maras.”

Referring to arguments over Armenian population, Ozdemir said, ”the
notebook which was claimed to have belonged to Talat Pasha does not
tell the truth. According to the notebook claiming that 924 thousand
Armenians had been relocated, Armenians in Aleppo had also been
forced to migrate. In fact, Armenians had been sent to Aleppo. The
Turkish General Staff archives put the number of the relocated
Armenians as nearly 500 thousand. Experts should sit and discuss
everything in detail.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress