Cooperation with focus on economy

AZG Armenian Daily #101, 03/06/2005

Visit

COOPERATION WITH FOCUS ON ECONOMY

Traditions of Armenian-Georgian Relations Returning

“We want not only to preserve but also to cement all good traditions,
especially those traditions that CIS states enjoyed before gaining
independence. Every state is treating its political issues as Armenia and
Georgia do. Part of the CIS states is heading for European integration. We
think that we have many things in common to join Europe. I think that each
meeting is a step forward”, Armenian Prime Minister Andranik Margarian
evaluated the meeting of heads of CIS governments in Tbilisi.

Andranik Margarian met yesterday Georgian Prime Minister Zurab Nugayideli
and parliament speaker Nino Burjanadze. The joint meeting of CIS government
leaders will take place today. Dozens of economic and political issues that
needed a closer look were discussed during the meetings with Georgia’s
leadership. Parliament speaker of Georgia was particularly happy with the
agreement of prime ministers on reformulating Georgia’s debt to Armenia.
Nino Burjanadze dwelt on as she said “the painful spot of Armenia: reopening
the Abkhaz railroad”. “There are many uncertainties, but we have changed our
approach. We used to think of settling the Abkhaz conflict first and then
consider reopening of the railway. Now we want simultaneously to reopen the
railway and to find solution to the Abkhaz conflict”.

The speaker was just back from Javakhk and named socio-economic problems of
the region with new enthusiasm. The first issue demanding urgent solution is
the issue of road network. Burjanadze also mentioned the absence of water
supply system in the region and said that they will try to solve the issue
at least in some areas of the region. Burjanadze emphasized that everything
that they will do for Javakhk is not in view of relations with Armenia but
because “Javakhk is our country and our homeland and we have to think of
social condition of the locals”.

The speaker thinks that the hubbub over Armenian cultural monuments is
puffed up saying that “despite separate sad facts, that is likely to be a
provocation of forces that are displeased with Georgian-Armenian peaceful
relations”. Nino Burjanadze did not say what “forces” she meant, saying that
she leaves it for journalists’ analysis.

The important achievement of Armenian Prime Minister’s visit is that the
sides agreed on building Armenia-Georgia high-voltage electric power line
that requires $10 million. Thanks to it Georgia will get 1.5 times more
electricity. Georgian minister of energetics will head a delegation to
Armenia in near future to discuss the matter. The electric power line is
scheduled to be exploited by the end of the current year.

Georgia shows signs of being interested in construction of Armenia-Iran gas
pipeline. But its unlikely that Georgia can join the project at the moment
as the first stage is set to satisfy Armenia’s inner demand. “Today it’s not
economically beneficent for us to build a pipeline with a greater diameter.
This line is supposed to serve ‘Nairit’ and chemical plant of Vanadzor. But
we do not exclude that the second line may be built in future”, Armenian PM
answered to Georgian expectations.

As a result of Georgian visit, a special group will discuss the new
socio-economic project for Javakhk. Armenia will take part not only in
implementation but also preparation phase of the project. “This can be
considered a huge progress. Georgian side always talked about it but never
took practical steps. We’ll try to advance this year”. Andranik Margarian
promised.

The joint Armenian-Georgian group will work in Javakhk in July and August.

By Karine Danielian

ANKARA: Turkey is making the right moves on Armenia

Turkey is making the right moves on Armenia
By Senem Caglayan

The New Anatolian / Ankara
3 June 2005

The Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA) supports Turkey’s
recent conduct towards the Armenians, said Vural Cengiz, chairman of
the ATAA, late on Tuesday.

At a press conference Cengiz said that the Armenian diaspora, with its
90-year claim of “genocide,” is not only damaging Turkey but Armenia as
well. “By bringing the controversial Armenian problem to the agenda
of the European Union as a precondition for Turkey’s membership,
Armenia is losing the chance to become an EU neighbor,” Cengiz charged.

“We support the new undertakings taken by the Turkish ruling and
opposition parties because the fight against the controversial Armenian
problem needs a comprehensive government strategy,” he asserted.

He maintained that any recognition of the Armenian “genocide” by the
U.S. Congress is bound to two conditions, saying, “The first one is
the weakening of bilateral relations between Turkey and the U.S.,
and the second is for the U.S. to start to believe Turkey is no longer
important to them.”

He described the Armenian pressure for recognition of their claims
as a political issue rather than a historical one, and called on the
Armenians to open their archives, as Turkey has.

He highlighted that the ATAA is the largest Turkish lobby in the
U.S., and said that if the Armenians don’t respond positively to the
constructive, confidence-building activities of the Turks, then they
will organize similar activities themselves and call on the Armenians
to account for the killings of Turkish diplomats, the invasion of
Azerbaijani territory, and killings in the Balkans.

Asked about the postponement of last week’s Armenian conference,
Cengiz said the ATAA is concerned because the conference was planned to
discuss the views of just one side and might have endangered Turkey’s
national security. “If Christian and Muslim lives have equal value
then both sides of the issue should discussed at the same time,”
he concluded.

ANKARA: If you refuse to kill in Russia, you will go to prison

If you refuse to kill in Russia, you will go to prison

Kavkaz-Center
Fri, 06 3 2005

In his interview to “Real Azerbaijan”, Alexander Litvinenko responded
to the statement of the Russian Embassy in Armenia

– Mr. Litvinenko, what is your comment on the statement of the Russian
Embassy in Armenia concerning your announcement about connection of
the GRU to the shooting of Armenian parliament that is the consequence
of Boris Berezovsky’s political order and insinuations against the
Russian-Armenian relations?

– Russian Embassy in Armenia is trying to wash away the crimes of
Russian Special Services by all means. I declare once more that
shooting of the Armenian parliament was organized by the GRU.

Boris Berezovsky is a political figure. And the fact of recognition
of his status by the Russian Embassy indicates that all former
statements of the official Kremlin about Berezovsky are deprived of
any grounds. Berezovsky has never mentioned that he is interested
in weakening of Russia ‘s role in the region and in deterioration of
relations between Russia and the states of the Southern Caucasus .

Moreover, as Executive Secretary for the CIS in the past, Berezovsky
has done a great deal for the development of Russian-Armenian
relations. The Russian diplomats in Armenia present the desirable for
the actual when they note that I speak for Berezovsky and implement his
will. At present I am a veteran of military service, lieutenant colonel
transferred to the reserve. Even when the judge advocate brought in
an action against me to reduce to the ranks (as it is known, hearing
of the case was held in my absence), the court rejected his suggestion.

I was dismissed from the FSB on the basis of the edict issued by
Vladimir Putin, and it was related with the “organizational” measures.

The embassy is casting aspersions on me.

– Some Russian media, close to the Kremlin have reported that you
are abusing your once high position in the leadership of FSB and
misinform the public.

– But then I am asking – Why have not they brought action against
me? My books were on sale in Moscow for a long time. Then they banned
my books. As to my second book, it was sold even in the building
of State Duma. No one has ever brought an action against me. No
one, neither Putin nor the FSB insisted on refutation. Each of my
statement was confirmed with the corresponding documents of special
services. Anywhere, in Norway, Denmark, Bulgaria, etc., in any country,
the representatives of Russian embassies said that it was insinuation
and nothing else. I produce the documents, name the witnesses, and
give detailed interviews. But they respond to all that with one word –
insinuation! And there is no one to say anything.

As to the statement concerning Russian Embassy in Armenia, I repeat,
they are trying to wash away terrorism and dirt from their special
services. Russian Special Services is a terrorist organization.

– Taking the opportunity, I would like to ask you if you have any
information regarding the relatives of Aslan Maskhadov and field
commander Doku Umarov, captured by the Russian Special Services.

– I also read Doku Umarov’s interview published by the Chechen sites,
in which he says that his relatives were taken hostages by Russian
special services. As to the whereabouts of Maskhadov’s relatives,
nothing is known to me. The Chechens suppose they are killed. Let
the Russian ambassador in Armenia answer this question – Where are
Aslan Maskhadov’s relatives? According to the Russian legislature,
they are considered the citizens of Russia, aren’t they? What has
become of them ? Where are they today?…

If you refuse to kill in Russia, you will go to prison.

Interview with Mr. Litvinenko was conducted by Elnur Eminogly,
“Real Azerbaijan”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Massis Weekly Online – Vol. 25 – No. 21

Massis Weekly Online
Http://
Vol. 25 – No. 21 – Saturday, June 4, 2005

– Uncontested Armenian Candidates In Beirut Re-Elected.
– Council Of Europe Slams Kocharian’s Constitutional Reform
– Opposition Urges ‘No’ Vote On Armenian Constitution
– Ill-Treatment of Demonstrators And Excessive Use Of Force
– Uncontested Armenian Candidates In Beirut Re-Elected.

BEIRUT – On Sunday May 29, the first round of Lebanese parliamentary
elections took place in the capital Beirut. Nineteen candidates were
elected in the three districts of Beirut. All nineteen are part of the
late Prime Minister Raffik Hariri’s Future Movement Block, which
encompasses the Social Democrat Hunchakian Party as well as the Ramgavar
party. Included in the nineteen are the four Armenian opposition members
of parliament who were reelected without contest after the withdrawal of
the pro-government Tashnak party member candidates.

Given the likelihood of any candidate contesting and winning against
Armenian opposition members of parliament who had a continued
relationship with the late Prime Minister slim to none, analysts were
not surprised of the Tashnag party withdrawal from the first round of
Lebanon’s parliamentary elections. Analysts also were not surprised by
the decrease in turnout of the Armenian constituency, irregardless of
Tashnag party’s call to boycott the election. The reelected Armenian
parliament members are; Dr. Yeghia Djeredjian (Armenian Orthodox and
member of Social Democrat Hunchakian party Central Committee), Mr. Hagop
Kassarjian (Armenian Orthodox and member of the Ramgavar party Central
Committee), Mr. Serge Tursarkisian (Armenian Catholic), Mr. Jean
Oghasabian (Armenian Orthodox).

Arab media outlets also reported illegal activities had been conducted
against Armenians in support of the so called Tashnag boycott. Examples
of which include but are not limited to; confiscation of identity
papers, and harassment of Armenian voters on their way to polling
places. These actions prompted Hunchak youth to contact the authorities,
confront the assailants, and escort Armenians to their respective
polling places. Once the authorities arrived four Armenian youth were
arrested, as a result of such activities.

Commenting on the illegal activities, reelected MP Dr. Yeghia
Djeredjian stated “It is acceptable to protest lawfully, it is also
acceptable to state ones opinion on matters, but we will not tolerate
the use of unlawful activities to get ones point across.”

The Armenian community of Lebanon enjoys six seats in the Lebanese
parliament. Analysts believe elections for the remaining two Armenian
parliament seats, one in Metn and another in Bekkaa Valley currently
held by members of the Tashnag party will be intensely contested.

– Council Of Europe Slams Kocharian’s Constitutional Reform

YEREVAN — The Venice Commission, a key Council of Europe body, which
monitors legislative reform in the human rights organization’s member
states, expressed on Friday its “deep dissatisfaction” with the latest
version of the draft amendments to Armenia’s constitution.

It warned that the Armenian authorities should put more significant
curbs on Kocharian’s sweeping powers if they want to forge closer links
with Europe.

“The members of the Venice Commission’s Working Group on constitutional
reform in Armenia expressed their deep dissatisfaction with this text,
as most of the Commission’s comments have not been taken into
consideration,” the commission said in a statement.

The statement quoted one of the members of the group, Kaarlo Tuori, as
saying: “The draft constitutional amendments need to be drastically
revised before they undergo the second reading.”

The constitutional package was approved by the Armenian parliament,
dominated by Kocharian’s loyalists, in the first reading on May 11. It
is a slightly revised version of the draft amendments that were unveiled
by Kocharian and his three-party governing coalition last November.

In a report last December, Venice Commission experts said “more
significant amendments” are needed for putting in place an effective
system of checks and balances between the government
branches in Armenia.

Their recommendations would in particular give more powers to the
National Assembly, seriously limit the president’s controversial
authority to appoint and sack virtually all judges and make
the mayor of Yerevan an elected official. The Armenian authorities have
so far been
reluctant to embrace such changes.

The Venice Commission warned that if their recommendations are not
“fully” accepted by the authorities “the whole constitutional reform
process would fail to bring Armenia closer to European values and attain
the aim of further European integration.”

Constitutional reform was one of the conditions for Armenia’s hard-won
accession to the Council of Europe in January 2001. In a resolution
adopted last September, the organization’s Parliamentary
Assembly (PACE) gave Yerevan until June to hold the repeatedly delayed
constitutional referendum. Armenian officials reportedly told PACE
leaders in April that the vote will likely take place in late July or
early August.

– Opposition Urges ‘No’ Vote On Armenian Constitution

YEREVAN — Armenia’s two main opposition groups urged their supporters
on Tuesday to vote against draft constitutional amendments which Robert
Kocharian is expected to put to a referendum
later this year.

In a joint statement, the Artarutyun (Justice) alliance and the
National Unity Party said the changes proposed by Kocharian and his
governing coalition envisage only a symbolic reduction of sweeping
powers vested in the Armenian presidency. “The draft amendments adopted
by the National Assembly in the first reading on May 11 reject changes
needed for the country’s democratization and aim to preserve the
country’s autocratic system,” they said.

“Real democratic constitutional reforms have no alternative and will be
carried out after the establishment of a legitimate government,” the
statement added. The statement followed a strong
criticism of Kocharian’s constitutional package that was voiced by the
Venice Commission of the Council of Europe.

The commission said on Friday that most of its key recommendations made
last December have been ignored by the Armenian authorities. Both
Artarutyun and the AMK indicated earlier this year that they will
endorse Kocharian’s constitutional reform if these proposals are
included in the package.

The proposed deal was effectively turned down by the parliament’s
pro-presidential majority, however.

A senior member of Artarutyun, Shavarsh Kocharian, told RFE/RL that the
opposition offer is still on the table. “If all of what we are proposing
is accepted why should be say ‘no’?” he said. “For us constitutional
reform is not a pretext to oust the regime. There are many other reasons
to oust the regime.”

However, other Artarutyun leaders have already pledged to turn the
planned constitutional vote into a “referendum of confidence” in
Kocharian. They admit that the opposition will try to use the
referendum as a rallying cry for another push for regime change.

– Amnesty International Annual Report On Armenia
Ill-Treatment Of Demonstrators And Excessive Use Of Force

NEW YORK — Scores of people were injured and forcibly detained when
special police units reportedly armed with truncheons used water cannons
and stun grenades to break up a peaceful opposition demonstration in the
capital Yerevan in the early hours of 13 April. Four journalists
who were covering the demonstration were reportedly severely beaten by
police officers. Dozens more opposition activists and supporters,
including women, were reportedly beaten and illtreated
during unsanctioned armed police raids on the head offices of the main
opposition parties launched that same night.

According to reports most of the activists present on the opposition
party premises were forcibly detained and kept in police cells for up to
48 hours. According to human rights groups and opposition
parties, beatings and ill-treatment of both those detained at the
opposition demonstration and the party offices continued in detention:
detainees, including women, allegedly complained about police officers
slapping them in the face, as well as kicking, kneeing and punching them
while shouting and swearing at them.

On 26 May Edgar Arakelian, a 24-year-old opposition activist from a
small town outside Yerevan, was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment for
“attacking a state official performing their duties”
during the 13 April demonstration. He had admitted to hitting a police
officer with a plastic water bottle during the demonstration but claimed
he had acted in self-defense after the police officer had hit him,
breaking his front teeth. He alleged in court that he had been tortured
in pre-trial detention in order to force him to admit that the violence
had been instigated by the political opposition. On 30 June the Appeals
Court upheld his sentence.

Opposition demonstrations in April were part of a two-month campaign of
mass public protests launched by opposition political parties demanding
the resignation of President Robert Kocharian.

The authorities described the opposition campaign as a coup attempt and
opened a criminal investigation into the activities of the opposition
Artarutyun (Justice) alliance.

The opposition rejected charges that they were calling for the violent
overthrow of the constitutional order. During their campaign hundreds of
opposition supporters, including prominent opposition
party members, were reportedly arbitrarily detained throughout the
country and dozens were sentenced to 15 days’ administrative detention
after trials that were said to have fallen far short of international
fair trial standards. Vagharshak Harutiunian, for example, a prominent
member of the opposition (Republic) party and a former Defense Minister,
was held in pre-trial detention for two months on charges of calling for
the “violent overthrow of the constitutional order” and for “publicly
insulting senior government officials”. He was released following
international pressure; however, the charges against him were not dropped.

On 28 April the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE)
held an emergency debate on the situation in Armenia and issued a
strongly worded resolution, condemning the use of force by police during
the opposition protests as “against the letter and spirit of its values”
and calling on the authorities to investigate any alleged human rights
violations and to release those opposition members still in detention.

PACE warned the government that it could withdraw the credentials of the
Armenian delegation to PACE if no progress was made by the authorities
by September. In an address
to PACE on 23 June President Kocharian defended the use of force by
police against opposition activists during the 13 April demonstration.

He was quoted as saying: “The organizers of the action were
demonstratively calling for civil disobedience. The police had no
alternative.”

Other assaults on activists

At an opposition rally on 5 April police reportedly refused to
intervene when around two dozen men, described as athletically-built
with shaven heads, tried to disrupt the peaceful protest meeting and
physically attacked journalists covering the event, kicking and beating
them and breaking their equipment. In June a Yerevan court ordered two
men to pay a small fine for their participation in
the beating of the journalists. Three men of a similar description
allegedly physically assaulted and critically injured opposition
politician Ashot Manucharian in Yerevan on 22 April. In June police
reportedly announced that they had suspended their investigation into
the assault because they had failed to identify the perpetrators.

Previously human rights activist Mikael Danielyan and opposition deputy
Victor Dallakian had also been physically assaulted by unknown
assailants. In an affidavit Mikael Danielyan described how
he was badly beaten by four unknown men who attacked him in the street
outside his home in Yerevan in the morning of 30 March when he returned
from walking his dog. He was reportedly repeatedly punched in the head
and kicked after he fell to the ground and needed hospital
treatment. He believed that the attack was related to his human rights
work and was meant to intimidate him and prevent him from monitoring the
authorities’ policing of the opposition campaign. President Kocharian
reportedly personally ordered an investigation into the attack on Mikael
Danielyan but during the period under review no one had been charged
with assaulting the human rights activist.

——————-

MassisWeekly.com – Massis Weekly Online – Organ Of the Social Democrat
Hunchak Party – Western USA – All rights reserved. Republication and
redistribution of Massis Weekly Online content is expressly prohibited
without the prior written consent of Massis Weekly Online. Massis Weekly
Online shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or
for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Http://www.MassisWeekly.com
www.MassisWeekly.com

Kazakhstan, OSCE mull project to scrap arms, ammo surplus

Kazakhstan, OSCE mull project to scrap arms, ammo surplus
By Oleg Antonov

ITAR-TASS News Agency
June 2, 2005 Thursday 7:43 AM Eastern Time

ALMATY, June 2 — Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Defence and the Organisation
for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) mull a joint project
to eliminate the surpluses of small arms and obsolete ammunition kept
at the republic’s military depots.

Vladimir Nosonovsky, chief of the Kazakh Armed Forces’ main directorate
for arsenals, bases, depots of ammunition and armaments, told Itar-Tass
on Thursday that arms surpluses amount to 30,000 weapons and about
2,5 million rounds of ammunition.

Nosonovsky said the arms had been at one time taken out by the Soviet
Army from Afghanistan, East Germany, and Armenia. They are out of
use by Kazakhstan’s Army or are damaged and are hazardous if further
stored. These are, in particular, tank projectiles of 100-mm caliber
as well as ammunition with a storage term of 40 years, Nosonovsky
said. “Other ammunition will not be eliminated,” he emphasised.

The Kazakh Defence Ministry has already eliminated 160,000 rounds of
ammunition but “the republic lacks capacities for this kind of work,”
Nosonovsky pointed out.

“The scope of assistance in this respect will be determined after
experts of the OSCE Conflicts Prevention Centre inspect the main
small arms storages in Kazakhstan,” Nosonovsky said. The experts are
expected to arrive in Kazakhstan on June 6.

Critics find fault with updated rule of law

Critics find fault with updated rule of law
by Nicholas Birch in Istanbul

South China Morning Post
June 2, 2005

Turkey’s first new criminal code in nearly 80 years went into effect
yesterday in what Ankara hopes will be a major step towards opening
accession proceedings with the European Union in October.

Legal experts see the document as an improvement on its 1926
predecessor, which was heavily indebted to 19th century Italian laws.

Turkish women’s rights activists have expressed overall satisfaction
with new articles criminalising sexual harassment, virginity tests
and rape within marriage.

The code also drops articles prescribing shorter sentences for
so-called honour killings. Every year, scores, if not hundreds,
of Turkish women are murdered by their families for transgressing
traditional codes of behaviour.

In line with their new policy of zero tolerance, MPs have also
increased the maximum penalty for torture from eight to 12 years.

But as Amnesty International points out, time limits on torture cases,
though extended, still stand. Facilitated by a notoriously inefficient
judicial system, the deliberate delaying of trials until they are
dropped is a common tactic.

The new criminal code has been dogged by controversy since last autumn,
when plans to criminalise adultery were dropped amid an international
outcry.

In recent days, government efforts to reduce penalties for illegal
religious courses have sparked a furious debate in Turkey, fiercely
attached to its secular identity.

The controversy has served only to mask far more serious shortcomings
in articles dealing with freedom of expression.

Though plans envisaging higher sentences for “crimes” committed
through the press were dropped last week, journalists still face
prison sentences for reporting on anything from ongoing criminal
investigations to “insult”.

Not only has a notorious article from the former code criminalising
acts that “belittle” state institutions been transferred almost
verbatim into today’s version, critics say, entirely new restrictions
have been added.

Foremost is article 305, which prescribes up to 10 years’ prison for
Turks or foreigners acting “against the fundamental national interest”,
a vague term that could include advocating the withdrawal of Turkish
troops from Cyprus or describing 1915 Armenian massacres as “genocide”.

Laws like this, says lawyer Yusuf Caglayan, “open the door to decisions
that prove not the citizen’s guilt, but the impossibility of proving
his innocence”.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

US Academics to Observe Karabagh Elections

RESS RELEASE
Armenian National Committee
Eastern United States
P.O. Box 1066
New York, NY 10040
Contact: Doug Geogerian
Tel: 917-428-1918
Fax: 718-651-3637
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

June 2, 2005

US Academics to Observe Karabagh Elections

NEW YORK – The Armenian National Committee reports that an independent
delegation of US academics will visit Nagorno-Karabagh this month to
serve as observers in the upcoming NKR parliamentary elections.

The delegation consists of Professors Dan Shartin and Leontina Hormel,
both of Worcester State College (WSC). Prof. Shartin is a past chair
of WSC’s Philosophy Department, while Prof. Hormel is a sociologist
specializing in the study of Ukraine’s shadow economy. Both are noted
scholars with long records of human rights activism. The delegation
will likely include additional members representing human rights
groups.

The delegation will arrive in Karabagh just prior to the June
19 elections, and will be meeting with members of the NKR Central
Electoral Commission, journalists, human rights activists, political
party representatives, as well as candidates and the electorate. They
will serve as observers on June 19 and will remain in Karabagh until
the vote tally concludes the following day.

“We are delighted that such prominent activists have agreed to join
the effort to ensure transparency in Karabagh’s elections,” stated
Doug Geogerian, ANC-ER Executive Director. “We are hopeful that
Karabagh’s leadership and people, once again, will demonstrate the
maturity to hold free and fair elections, in a region of the world
where democracy’s hold is often still tenuous.”

The delegation’s logistical arrangements are being coordinated with
the NKR’s Public Affairs Office, based in Washington, DC.

###

http://www.anca.org/

Top ten non-native species in Scotland

TOP TEN NON-NATIVE SPECIES IN SCOTLAND

The Express, UK
June 2, 2005

1 Rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum). Introduced from Armenia and
Turkey in mid-1700s as ornamental plant. Has now reached pest status.

2 Giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). Introduced from South
West Asia in late 1800s. Contact with skin can cause severe irritation.

3 Spanish bluebell (Hyacinthoides hispanica). Threatens our native
bluebell species.

4 Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica). An indestructible weed
introduced in the mid-19th century. It is the most pernicious weed
in Britain.

5 Few-flowered leek (Allium paradoxum). From the Caucasus region.
Invasive woodland plant is spreading rapidly, especially in southern
Scotland.

6 Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera). Often found along
riverbanks.

It can outgrow other species, stopping native plants from thriving.

7 False-acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia). From North America. Its
suckering can become a serious problem.

8 Parrot’s-feather (Myriophyllum aquaticum). This South American
plant is mostly found in shallow ponds.

9 Water fern (Azolla filiculoides). From North and South America,
it is able to survive harsh British winters and can rapidly exclude
all competitors.

10 Australian swamp stonecrop (Crassula helmsii). Also known as New
Zealand pygmyweed, introduced in the early 20th century. Grows rapidly
in water, threatening native aquatic plants.

Iran, Turkmenistan to build hydrogen power plant

IRAN, TURKMENISTAN TO BUILD HYDROGEN POWER PLANT

IPR Strategic Business Information Database
June 2, 2005

According to “Tehran Times”, Iran and Turkmenistan are determined
to construct a 1,000-megawatt hydrogen-fuelled power station, an
Iranian official said. Ramezan Vahidi, director for research center of
renewable energies, told reporters no private financier has dared to
get involved in the project “because of big expenses”. The first phase
of investment requires 2,000 euros per kilowatt, he said, adding the
costs would fall in the next stages. Iran has also cooperated with
Armenia in construction of windmill to generate electricity.