The Armenian Diaspora in the 21st Century: Communities, Institutions, Individu

Mediamax, Armenia
July 9 2026

The Armenian Diaspora in the 21st Century: Communities, Institutions, Individuals

The Diasporan Perspectives (DP) think tank is launching a call for research proposals.

 

DP commissions, publishes and disseminates new research in the social sciences focusing on the Armenian Diaspora and Armenia. Founded in 2025 by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, it also serves as a convening space for leaders, policymakers and experts. DP brings a unique diasporan perspective to Armenian national issues. Its mission is to foster cutting-edge social science research, analysis and strategic thinking that is transformative, open to the world and Armenian focused.

Society | 2025-12-06 09:00:08

Diasporan Perspectives: Opening the “treasure” and rethinking Armenia

The aim of this call for research proposals is to publish an original anthology on the contemporary Armenian Diaspora. There has been a substantial body of academic research on the topic in the last three decades, in large part due to the efforts of a handful of experts and initiatives, including case studies, historical analysis and thematic approaches.

 

Below is the announcement of the Diasporan Perspectives think tank:

 

In this call, we are interested in learning where the state of research currently stands, to generate new research, and hear as many diverse voices as possible, from different disciplinary and theoretical perspectives. The focus is on contemporary issues in and relating to the Armenian Diaspora. Disciplinary and theoretical approaches are wide open. The overarching question the initiative is seeking to answer is: where is the Armenian Diaspora heading in the 21st century?

 

The commissioned research papers, after passing peer review, will be published in an edited book or in a multivolume format.

 

We are interested in learning how research is dealing with Armenian diasporan communities and institutions, and the challenges they are facing in a rapidly changing and unstable world. While important historic Armenian communities in the Middle East are emptying because of wars and instability, migration is not only creating new challenges, but also leading to new opportunities.

 

Such changes can be studied in more detail by looking at the evolution of institutions in the Diaspora such as the church, political parties, schools, mass media, foundations, sports clubs, charity organisations, cultural associations, academic centres, etc., as well as newly emerged initiatives including professional associations, single issue mobilisation efforts and fundraising forums. Studies about individuals who make important contributions to, and have significant impact on, the Armenian Diaspora are also part of this research initiative.

 

The relationship of the Diaspora with the Armenian nation-state is another major aspect to be analysed. How did the emergence of independent Armenia influence the Diaspora? While there are several important studies on the political aspects of this relationship, other approaches such as sociological and anthropological perspectives are scarce. How did the emergence of independent Armenia, and Yerevan becoming a new “diasporan” hub, influence inter- and intra-diasporic contacts, communications and movements? How did the Diaspora’s focus on Armenia impact its resource mobilisation vis-à-vis national and local issues or needs? Did Armenian diasporan identity change due to the emergence of a sovereign nation-state?

Photo: REUTERS

The other side of the Diaspora-Armenia relationship is the policies and approaches in Yerevan pertaining to the Diaspora. How did these change, if they indeed changed? What are the views and actions of state and non-state actors in Armenia in relation to the Diaspora? How did out-migration from Armenia influence cultural production in the Diaspora, for example by the outflow of professionals, including scientists, cultural workers and athletes?

 

The topic of Armenian Diaspora and philanthropy is of particular interest to us. In the absence of a state, Armenian cultural life in the Diaspora (as well as in the homeland) has traditionally been supported by philanthropic initiatives. In the past, wealthy individuals from Persia and India pioneered such giving. Subsequently, the wealthy amiras and industrialists of Istanbul, Cairo, Baku and Tbilisi stepped up to the plate. From Mantashyan to the Melkonian brothers, from Calouste Gulbenkian to Alec Manoogian, Hrair Hovnanian, Kirk Krikorian and the Manoukian brothers funded educational, cultural and political initiatives. How are the wealthy Armenians of the Diaspora, be it in Switzerland or the Silicon Valley, engaging with Armenian (or non-Armenian) issues today? How is philanthropy changing? Are there “disrupters” in the traditional domain of community support?

 

Finally, the outmigration from the Middle East, Armenia and other former Soviet Republics is creating new diasporan communities. What is known about them? Are new types of institutions taking shape in such communities? What dynamics are at play in comparison to earlier experiences of diaspora-building? What is the relationship between the “new” and “established” communities where they coexist?

 

The current research project is provisionally planned to be built around the following structure and themes:

 

Part I: Armenian Diasporan Communities Today

 

•    Changes due to out-migration, for example in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Georgia, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Palestine/Israel, Greece, Egypt, etc.

•    Current developments in recently formed communities, including Russia, Poland, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Scandinavian countries, Spain, Portugal, etc.

•    Proposals may focus on specific regions or cities such as California, Rhone Valley, Tabriz, Aleppo, Beirut, Moscow, Nor Nakhichevan/Rostov-on-Don, Tbilisi, Istanbul, etc.

 

Part II: Armenian Diasporan Institutions and Organisations

 

•    Specific institutions, such as the churches, the three political parties and their satellite organisations, major foundations, organisations or initiatives – be they established or relatively new. Studies on youth and social movements, with particular emphasis on current dynamics.

•    Philanthropy and the Diaspora, especially after 1988.

•    Diasporan political activism.

•    Diasporan sub-groups: issue-based mobilisation, professional associations, specific community initiatives.

Photo: REUTERS

Part III: Armenian Diasporan Individuals and their Biographies/Activities

•    In addition to institutions, there are people of different backgrounds who invest their time, energy and funds in Armenian issues, be it at the local or pan-national levels: philanthropists, community leaders, connectors, activists, intellectuals, artists, etc. What can be learned from their experiences – be they individuals, families or small informal groups?

•    Individuals as agents of change and innovation. What impact have their activities or approaches had in the Diaspora or in Armenia?

 

Part IV: Armenian Diaspora and its Relations with External Actors

 

•    Diaspora’s relations with host-country institutions and activities (political, social, cultural, economic), including with non-Armenian diasporan communities.

•    Diaspora’s relations with countries of origin (where born, the land of ancestors, the Republic of Armenia, or an abstract notion of homeland).

•    Expectations from Armenia and its government.

•    Migration from the Diaspora to Armenia.

•    Diaspora’s relations with regional bodies, for example with inter-state institutions such as the UN, the EU and others, as well as how such institutions relate to Armenian diasporic communities.

Photo: REUTERS

Part V: Cross-Cutting Themes and Issues in the Armenian Diaspora

 

•    Women and power relations in diasporan settings.

•    In addition to specific studies on gender-related issues, we strongly encourage to incorporate gender analysis throughout the various research areas mentioned above.

•    Educational institutions and language preservation/revitalisation.

•    The political economy of the Diaspora: how is its infrastructure funded? The nature and causes of inequalities. Regional differences in economic priorities.

•    Digital spaces, social media, other communication tools and their impact on mobilisation and identity.

•    Cultural production and the arts.

•    Social issues and changing habits.

 

Society | 2020-09-07 09:17:22

The Armenian Diaspora Survey and the “components” of Armenian identity

We encourage researchers to consult the Armenian Diaspora Survey (ADS) in their research: Concurrent to this call for proposals, the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, through its Diasporan Perspectives initiative, will make the data of ADS available to the public by the end of 2026.

 

Application Process

 

The deadline for abstracts is 1 September 2026. Abstracts must be sent to [email protected]. The subject line should say: “DP diaspora research project proposal.” The application package must include:

 

•    An abstract of the proposed research, maximum 400 words,

•    A brief cover note,

•    CV,

•    List of publications and/or previous research projects (if not in CV).

 

Additional Submission Requirements

 

•    Applications must be submitted in English or French.

•    Both individual and joint applications are accepted.

•    Applicants may submit one application only.

•    All application materials must be submitted in PDF format.

 

Questions and further information: [email protected].

 

The selection committee will be composed of Diasporan Perspectives staff, a Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation representative, and two external experts.

 

Authors whose academic papers are accepted will receive an honorarium of 2.000 EUR. The amount for policy papers is to be determined.

Photo: REUTERS

Key dates

 

•    Deadline for abstracts: 1 September 2026.

•    Decisions will be communicated to applicants by 15 November 2026.

•    First draft of papers to be submitted by 31 March 2027.

•    Workshop (in person and/or online) to discuss draft papers in May 2027.

•    Papers to be peer reviewed during the summer of 2027.

•    Final papers to be submitted by 31 July 2027.

•    Accepted papers will be submitted to a publisher in 2028.

—

Erdoğan meets Italian PM Meloni on sidelines of NATO summit

Türkiye18:17, 8 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan met Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on the sidelines of the 36th NATO Summit.

The information was reported by the Anadolu news agency.

The meeting took place at the Presidential Complex in Ankara and was held behind closed doors.

The Turkish delegation included Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, National Defence Minister Yaşar Güler, Justice and Development Party (AK Party) Deputy Chair and Spokesperson Ömer Çelik, Head of the Presidential Communications Directorate Burhanettin Duran, Chief Presidential Adviser on Foreign Policy and Security Akif Çağatay Kılıç, and Deputy Chair of the Presidential Security and Foreign Policies Council Çağrı Erhan.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Erdoğan meets German Chancellor Merz on sidelines of NATO summit

Türkiye19:24, 8 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan met German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on the sidelines of the 36th NATO Summit.

The information was reported by the Anadolu news agency.

The meeting took place at the Presidential Complex in Ankara and was held behind closed doors.

The Turkish delegation included Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, National Defence Minister Yaşar Güler, Justice and Development Party (AK Party) Deputy Chair and Spokesperson Ömer Çelik, Head of the Presidential Communications Directorate Burhanettin Duran, and Chief Presidential Adviser on Foreign Policy and Security Akif Çağatay Kılıç.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Next NATO summit to be held in Albania

World19:28, 8 July 2026
Read the article in: Français Armenian:

The next NATO summit will be held in Albania, although the exact date has not yet been determined, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has said.

Speaking at a press conference following the Alliance’s summit in Ankara, Rutte said: “The next summit will certainly take place in Albania, but the date has yet to be decided.”

Earlier, Bloomberg reported that NATO leaders were considering postponing the summit in Albania, originally scheduled for 2027, in an effort to avoid possible new disagreements with the United States.

Read the article in: Français Armenian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

NATO to provide Ukraine with at least €70 billion in military aid next year,

World21:07, 8 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

NATO member states have pledged to provide Ukraine with at least €70 billion in military equipment, assistance and training support next year.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte made the announcement at the closing ceremony of the Alliance leaders’ summit.

He said NATO would continue supporting Ukraine while also pursuing efforts to achieve peace.

“NATO will continue its efforts to achieve peace. As Ukraine shows initiative on the battlefield, our support must also continue,” the secretary general said.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Trump says U.S. to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missile systems

U. S.21:07, 8 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

The United States will grant Ukraine a license to manufacture Patriot missile systems.

As reported by Reuters, U.S. President Donald Trump made the announcement during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Ankara.

“We will give you a license to produce Patriots. That way, you won’t complain that we’re not providing enough Patriots,” Trump said.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Iran reports one serviceman killed in U.S. strikes on several provinces

Iran16:46, 8 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Iran said one serviceman was killed after U.S. military strikes targeted coastal bases and civilian facilities in several parts of the country overnight on July 8.

The information was announced by the Iranian Armed Forces.

According to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), one soldier was killed by shrapnel in the southeastern city of Bandar Mahshahr.

The Fars news agency reported that two facilities in the southwestern province of Bushehr were struck by U.S. forces.

Strikes were also reported in the port city of Sirik, as well as on Kharg and Qeshm islands.

According to the U.S. Central Command, precision strikes targeted more than 80 Iranian sites in response to Iran’s targeting of three vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran, in turn, said it had struck 85 U.S. military facilities in Bahrain and Kuwait and had also shot down a U.S. MQ-9 drone.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Trump threatens Iran with more “powerful strikes” later today

Iran18:15, 8 July 2026
Read the article in: ArabicՀայերենRussian

U.S. President Donald Trump threatened Iran with further military action later on July 8 while speaking to reporters alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Ankara.

The remarks were reported by the BBC.

“We hit them very hard last night, very, very hard,” Trump said.

He added that the United States would most likely launch another round of powerful strikes against Iran later in the evening.

“I gave them a little warning: we’re going to hit them hard again tonight,” Trump said.

U.S. forces overnight on July 8 struck around 80 targets in Iran in response to the recent targeting of three vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran, in turn, launched retaliatory strikes targeting 85 U.S. military facilities across the region. The United States also cancelled plans to ease oil-related sanctions on Iran.

Against the backdrop of the latest escalation, Trump said the ceasefire with Iran was no longer in effect and that Washington no longer intended to hold negotiations with Tehran.

Read the article in: ArabicՀայերենRussian

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Iran suspends negotiations with U.S. on final settlement – TASS

Iran20:14, 8 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Tehran has suspended negotiations with Washington on reaching a final settlement, citing threats from the United States, a senior Iranian source told TASS.

“Due to direct threats made by U.S. President Donald Trump against the Iranian people and Washington’s repeated violations of its commitments, Iran has suspended negotiations with the United States on concluding a final agreement,” the source said.

According to the source, any U.S. military aggression against Iran would be met with a broader and more decisive response than before.

“While continuing to violate its obligations, the United States launched attacks on Iran’s southern islands. In response to this aggression, which constitutes a gross violation of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding, Iran carried out large-scale retaliatory strikes against U.S. positions in the region. Iran has issued a firm warning that any further U.S. military action will be met with a more decisive, broader and harsher response than previously,” the source said.

Earlier on July 8, U.S. President Donald Trump threatened Iran while speaking to reporters alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Ankara.

“We hit them very hard last night, very, very hard,” Trump said.

He added that the United States would most likely launch another round of powerful strikes against Iran later in the evening.

“I gave them a little warning: we’re going to hit them hard again tonight,” Trump said.

U.S. forces overnight on July 8 struck around 80 targets in Iran in response to the recent targeting of three vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran, in turn, launched retaliatory strikes targeting 85 U.S. military facilities across the region. The United States also cancelled plans to ease oil-related sanctions on Iran.

Against the backdrop of the latest escalation, Trump said the ceasefire with Iran was no longer in effect and that Washington no longer intended to hold negotiations with Tehran.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Israel strongly opposes US sale of F-35 fighter jets to Türkiye, Netanyahu say

Türkiye13:26, 8 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Israel is strongly opposed to the sale of U.S.-made fifth-generation F-35 fighter jets to Türkiye, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an interview with CNN on July 7.

“Türkiye has aggressive ambitions… This is not a force for peace and stability… I wouldn’t do it,” Netanyahu said.

The Israeli prime minister again warned that supplying F-35 fighter jets to Türkiye would “destroy the balance of power in the Middle East,” according to CNN.

Netanyahu also cautioned that selling Washington’s most advanced fighter aircraft to Türkiye would not make Ankara a friend of the United States.

“He is not an exemplary ally of the United States. He threatens to destroy my country, the only Jewish state,” Netanyahu said.

Days earlier, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said in an interview with CNN Türk that Israel had “become a burden humanity can no longer bear.”

Netanyahu also said he and U.S. President Donald Trump agree on almost all issues, although some differences remain.

“He is the president of the United States. He does what is good for the United States. I am the prime minister of Israel, I do what is important for Israel, and most of the time those things overlap,” Netanyahu said.

During a meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Ankara on July 7, Trump said he planned to lift restrictive measures against Ankara and did not rule out the sale of U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets to Türkiye.

Washington imposed sanctions on Türkiye and removed it from the F-35 program after Ankara purchased Russia’s S-400 air defense system in 2019. The U.S. Congress also passed legislation barring any F-35 sale to Türkiye as long as Ankara retains the S-400 system, saying the Russian system poses a security risk to U.S.-made combat aircraft.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—