Armenia and Azerbaijan talk peace, but in a border forest, the wounds of war a

Malay Mail
Oct 30, 2026

SRASHEN, Oct 30 — From a hillside above Armenia’s Shikahogh nature reserve, local official Marat Harutyunyan pointed to forests cleared for Azerbaijan’s military, construction Yerevan says threatens rare wildlife and the livelihoods of local villagers.

The battle over the fate of the forest exposes the deep, lingering tensions between the two countries as they seek to broker a lasting peace after three decades of hostility and multiple wars.

In advances in 2021-2022, Azerbaijan captured parts of the reserve that lies along the countries’ shared border.

The conflict culminated in 2023 when it retook Karabakh from Armenian separatists, prompting the entire Armenian population — some 100,000 people — to flee.

The two countries have since tried to broker a permanent peace deal and last year initialled an agreement in Washington, seen as a major step towards ratification.

But while the capitals talk of detente, in the rural southern Armenian region of Syunik, residents are still on edge.

Nearby Azerbaijani military positions and landmines cause them to fear for their safety.

“All the land is directly in the enemy’s sights,” said Harut Aghatelyan, a 35-year-old biologist who has worked at the reserve for the past 15 years.

He has repeatedly found dead animals with missing legs — blown up in landmine blasts that echo through the woods.

‘Cut down everything’ 

After seizing part of the area, Azerbaijan’s military is now building wide forest paths to improve access and supply lines.

Above Srashen village, pale roads snake through the autumn woodland, and a police checkpoint blocks the old route towards the reserve.

Hilltop Armenian and Azerbaijani flags mark competing positions, sometimes only a few hundred metres apart.

Azerbaijan’s advances have left a nearby village, Nerkin-Hand, surrounded on three sides, as its troops “occupy more than 2,700 hectares of the reserve and several hundred hectares of agricultural land”, Harutyunyan, the Armenia official, said.

“They cut down everything, without checking whether a species is in the Red Book or not,” he added, referring to Armenia’s register of endangered species.

Armenia has highlighted the issue as it hosts the UN’s COP17 biodiversity summit in Yerevan, where states gather to review global efforts to protect species and their habitats.

‘Large-scale ecocide’ 

Azerbaijan has rejected accusations of occupying Armenian territory, saying that the border in the area has not been formally demarcated.

Established in 1958, Shikahogh covers roughly 12,400 hectares of oak and beech forests, plane tree groves and yew — an endangered species.

It also shelters Caucasian leopards, brown bears and bezoar goats.

Harutyunyan fears tree felling and engineering work could trigger landslides, mudflows and rockfalls.

But the military presence and landmines have made assessing the consequences on the ground impossible, residents and specialists say.

“Nobody knows the true extent of the damage,” said forest expert Ayser Ghazaryan.

His analysis of satellite images indicates earthworks across about 90 hectares, including some 60 hectares of forest, and the felling of an estimated 14,000 to 16,000 cubic metres of timber.

It is not clear whether a full recovery from what he called “large-scale ecocide” is even possible.

Muraz Arzumanyan rides on a car in the vicinity of the village of Srashen in Armenia’s Shikahogh nature reserve October 22, 2026. — AFP pic

‘No security’

The loss of farmland and grazing is also threatening locals’ livelihoods.

Muraz Arzumanyan, 26, is unemployed and lives with his parents. Trained as a metallurgist, he previously served as a soldier with the Armenian army.

“How can I start a family and have children when there is no security?” he said.

“I cannot imagine my child growing up here, going into the yard to play and run around, constantly in someone’s sights.”

The school in Shikahogh has just one pupil.

Elderly residents say they can no longer visit relatives’ graves.

The municipality runs free buses and hopes those who left will one day return.

Aghatelyan, the biologist, meanwhile is determined to stay.

He raises rabbits and refuses to leave the village where his family has lived for generations.

“I was born and grew up surrounded by forests. I love these forests,” he said.

“My child is 18 months old, and I want him to grow up here.” — AFP

—

Abkhazians outraged by remarks about them in Russian-published encyclopaedia o

JAM News
Oct 30, 2026
  • Sukhum

Authorities in Abkhazia are calling for the authors of the Armenians of the Black Sea Region encyclopaedia to face criminal charges. The local Armenian community funded the publication in Russia. Abkhazia’s Prosecutor General’s Office has launched a preliminary inquiry after finding material in the book that contains offensive remarks about the Abkhaz and Abaza peoples.

The controversy centres on a short entry in the encyclopaedia about the term “Abaza”. In Turkey, people use this word to refer to Abkhazians and Abazins. Many members of these communities moved to the Ottoman Empire in the second half of the 19th century as a result of the Caucasian War.

The entry says that Hamshen Armenians, who moved from Turkey to the Black Sea coast of the Caucasus following the genocide, used the term “Abaza” as a euphemism for “masturbating”.

Part of Abkhazia’s opposition urges Armenians to vote against Nikol Pashinyan in parliamentary elections

Other opposition figures criticised the appeal, describing it as interference in Armenia’s internal affairs.

“The publication in the Armenians of the Black Sea Region encyclopaedia is neither an academic debate nor an accidental mistake. All indications suggest that it was intended as an outright provocation,” the influential Abkhaz veterans’ organisation Aruaa said in a statement.

The organisation called for tough measures against the authors and others involved in publishing the book. These could range from declaring them persona non grata to opening criminal cases against them.

Several other political and civic organisations in the republic, including pro-government groups, backed the demand.

“There is an urgent need for a clear and principled legal assessment of the contents of the Armenians of the Black Sea Region book, as well as the actions of its authors, publishers and others involved in preparing and distributing it. Several statements in the book raise legitimate concerns and harm inter-ethnic relations,” their joint appeal said.

Pashinyan’s statement expressing support for Georgia’s unity has stirred outrage in Abkhazia

Pashinyan stirred anger in Abkhazia, home to many ethnic Armenians, by expressing support for Georgia’s territorial integrity

The Union of Armenians of Russia responded to the outrage in Abkhazia. Its representative, Agasi Arabyan, said that almost the entire print run of the encyclopaedia had been withdrawn and immediately returned to the printing house for corrections, despite the significant additional costs. The author resumed promoting the book only after the disputed passage had been removed.

However, the publishers could not locate and retrieve several copies that they had distributed immediately after receiving them from the printing house. They therefore announced that they would buy back the remaining copies and destroy them. They managed to find some, but not all.

Armenians are the second-largest ethnic group in Abkhazia.

In the latest presidential election, held in March 2025, most local Armenians supported incumbent President Badra Gunba. In all previous elections, however, their votes had been distributed fairly evenly among the main presidential candidates.

Support from the Armenian community proved to be one of the decisive factors in Gunba’s victory, but it also triggered several inter-ethnic conflicts.

—

Will Turkey open its border with Armenia amid tensions with Baku? Views from Y

JAM News
Oct 30, 2026
  • Armine Martirosyan
  • Yerevan

Discussions about the possible opening of the Armenian-Turkish border have intensified in Armenia in recent weeks. Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan has not ruled out the possibility that the border could open before the two sides agree on candidates for new special envoys to oversee the normalisation process.

“The border remains closed, but I believe the process has reached a fairly advanced stage. It is entirely possible that we will wake up tomorrow morning and see a headline in the news: ‘The border between Armenia and Turkey is open’,” he said.

Armenian analysts say opening the border would clearly benefit Armenia, but would also serve Turkey’s interests. Some suggest that Turkey wants to open the border because this could:

  • expand its trade and transport opportunities;
  • provide an alternative to existing routes through Georgia;
  • strengthen its role in regional connectivity.

However, not everyone shares this view. Political analyst Alexander Iskandaryan is sceptical about the prospects for an early border opening.

In an interview with JAMnews, he also discussed the recent cooling of relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan. Some in Armenia see this as a factor that could accelerate the normalisation process. Some experts suggest that, under these circumstances, Turkey could open the border without taking Baku’s position into account. Azerbaijan insists that Turkey should not move ahead before the two countries settle their relations with Armenia.

However, Alexander Iskandaryan believes that disagreements between Ankara and Baku do not mean Turkey will change its policy towards Armenia. He argues that relations with Azerbaijan remain strategically important to Turkey, and that “economic factors alone are unlikely to outweigh political calculations”.


  • ‘Hint of discontent’: Armenia’s foreign minister skips Antalya diplomatic forum
  • Armenian and Turkish business leaders call for borders to reopen. Is it likely to happen?
  • ‘We mutually closed page of enmity’: Armenian Parliament Speaker on relations with Turkey

What matters is not brotherhood but rational political calculation

“Azerbaijan is extremely wary of the prospect of the Armenian-Turkish border opening. It sees the border closure as a means of putting pressure on Armenia. This has been the case since the conflict began, including during ‘football diplomacy’, when the two sides discussed opening the border without preconditions. However, Turkey eventually tied the process to a resolution of the Karabakh conflict, largely under pressure from the Azerbaijani lobby.

The process of normalising relations between Armenia and Turkey, known as ‘football diplomacy’, began in 2008. Serzh Sargsyan, who was Armenia’s president at the time, initiated it.

At his invitation, Turkish President Abdullah Gül first visited Armenia. The two presidents watched a football match between their national teams. In 2009, Sargsyan travelled to Turkey, where the two national teams again played a match.

‘Football diplomacy’ resulted in the so-called Zurich Protocols, which the two countries’ foreign ministers signed in 2009. The documents set out plans to establish diplomatic relations and the principles governing bilateral ties. However, neither side ratified the protocols.

Despite the changes in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the border remains closed. Turkey and Azerbaijan continue to set conditions, including the signing of a peace treaty. This shows that no clear ‘red line’ exists beyond which the pressure would stop. The demands keep changing, and there is no guarantee that meeting them would change the situation. From Azerbaijan’s perspective, keeping these levers of pressure makes perfect sense.

The current debate in Armenia and Azerbaijan stems primarily from the disagreements between Baku and Ankara that have recently come into the open. The Armenian government apparently hopes these differences could weaken Azerbaijan’s influence over Turkey’s position and prompt Ankara to open the Armenian-Turkish border despite Baku’s objections.

However, I do not think the border is likely to open in the near future. On the contrary, the chances are quite low.

Disagreements between Azerbaijan and Turkey have always existed. They simply attracted less public attention in the past and remained largely unnoticed by wider audiences.

For example, the two countries take different approaches to relations with Israel. Azerbaijan maintains fairly close ties with Israel, while Turkey’s relations with the country have deteriorated over time, at times leading to serious disputes. Another example is the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Ankara has openly urged Baku to recognise it, but Azerbaijan has not done so.

The recent surge in attention to disagreements between the two countries, including the dispute over the hijab ban in Azerbaijani schools, is merely the visible part of long-standing tensions. However, I would not expect these differences to make Baku and Ankara stop listening to each other. Disagreements between Azerbaijan and Turkey certainly exist, but that does not mean they will lead either country to rethink the relationship.

When it comes to Armenia, Turkey consistently supports Azerbaijan. It would be methodologically wrong to explain this policy solely through cultural affinity, the idea of ‘one nation, two states’ or feelings of brotherhood. This is not about sentiment but about rational political calculation, which underpins relations between the two countries.”

Opinion: Yerevan should not be drawn into Baku and Ankara’s ‘virtual reality’

Political analyst says Azerbaijan and Turkey project an image of “peace-loving states,”urging Armenia’s authorities to assess the situation soberly.

Political obstacles outweigh potential economic benefits

“Claims that opening the border with Armenia would bring Turkey significant economic benefits seem misleading or, at the very least, poorly informed. Armenia is not a large enough market for Turkey for the economic gains from opening the border to outweigh the political obstacles, which are far more significant.

The experience of ‘football diplomacy’ shows that Ankara was then seeking political gains in its relations with the West rather than closer economic ties with Armenia. At the time, the Armenian issue formed part of Turkey’s agenda in its relations with Europe and the European Union, and Ankara hoped to secure certain political benefits from it. There is no comparable rapprochement with the EU today. Azerbaijan, meanwhile, is already a reliable partner, and Turkey has a strong interest in maintaining its relations with Baku.

Never say ‘never’. But, in my view, hopes for an early border opening stem either from bias or from a failure to understand the situation. Even agreements that the two sides have reached do not always translate into action. For example, they have been discussing the restoration of the historic Ani Bridge for three years, while the completion of the tender process is presented as a major achievement. That is why I consider a border opening in the near future unlikely.”

Why does Turkey need another route?

“The argument that opening the Armenian-Turkish border would give Turkey an additional gateway to Central Asian markets is unconvincing. A railway route through Georgia already exists: the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars line, which remains underused. If Turkey had a serious interest in increasing freight traffic in this direction, it could make better use of the existing route. It is also unclear what additional freight volumes would require a new route through Armenia.”

Opening the border does not guarantee normalisation

“Opening the border with Turkey could bring Armenia economic and political benefits. Above all, it would make transport links with Europe easier and reduce transport costs. Turkey has a large economy and could become an important market for Armenian businesses, although the Turkish regions bordering Armenia rank among the least developed in the country. Nevertheless, Armenian entrepreneurs could find opportunities there to export goods and services.

Opening the border could therefore create new economic opportunities for Armenia. However, it would not, in itself, mean a full normalisation of Armenian-Turkish relations.”

—

Armenia calls for investigation into alleged abuses by Russian company running

JAM News
Oct 30, 2026
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Aram Sargsyan, leader of the Republic Party, has called on Armenia’s prosecutor general to investigate the activities of South Caucasus Railway. If the investigation uncovers any abuses, the politician insists that prosecutors open a criminal case.

Armenia’s railways operate under a concession agreement with South Caucasus Railway. The company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Russian Railways. Armenia signed a 30-year concession agreement in 2008, handing the management of Armenian Railways CJSC to Russian Railways. However, freight traffic has since halved, some routes have stopped operating, and the company has yet to fulfil its mandatory investment commitments.

Sargsyan says the authorities need to examine:

  • the efficiency of the company’s operations;
  • its compliance with its contractual management obligations;
  • the protection of the state’s property interests.

“I ask you to accept this statement and consider it a report of a suspected criminal offence under the procedure established by the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia,” he said.

The politician’s appeal to the prosecutor general comes amid talks between Armenia and Russia over the railway concession.

Yerevan has long called for changes to the concession arrangement. It argues that a new format would make Armenia’s railway more competitive. In particular, the Armenian authorities have proposed transferring the concession to a third party. Moscow, however, has yet to accept the proposal.

Two weeks ago, Russian Railways CEO Oleg Belozyorov visited Yerevan. Following their meeting, Armenia’s prime minister announced that the two sides had agreed to set up a joint working group. According to Nikol Pashinyan, the group has three months to examine specific questions from the Armenian government and provide answers. The key issue is whether Russia is prepared to invest in the railway. Yerevan will decide on its next steps after receiving the group’s findings.

The Prosecutor General’s Office issued a brief statement, offering no further comment. It said that it had accepted Aram Sargsyan’s application for consideration.


  • Armenia launches independent restoration of railway to Turkish and Azerbaijani borders
  • ‘We are not discussing Trump Route project with Russia’ – Armenia’s deputy foreign minister
  • Opinion: Armenia would benefit from returning its railways to state control

From dismantling infrastructure to declining freight volumes

In his appeal, the leader of the Republic Party recalled an interview that Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan gave to the Russian newspaper Kommersant on 10 September 2018. Discussing South Caucasus Railway, Pashinyan said the company’s alleged abuses amounted to approximately $60 million. He also said law enforcement agencies were investigating the matter and that the public would soon learn the findings.

“I believe it is necessary to clarify how the investigation conducted at the time concluded, what results it produced and whether the state received compensation for any damage it may have suffered,” Sargsyan wrote.

Following Pashinyan’s statement in 2018, the authorities launched criminal proceedings. However, they discontinued the case in March 2021. No further developments have emerged since then. Nor has anyone reported whether the company compensated the state for the alleged damage.

The politician identified five issues in his appeal to the prosecutor general:

1. Dismantling railway infrastructure

“It is necessary to establish the circumstances surrounding the dismantling of railway infrastructure along the Meghri–Kapan section, which stretches for approximately 40km. The investigation should also establish the legal grounds for the work, determine what happened to the dismantled assets, assess whether the company lawfully disposed of the property and examine how it used the proceeds from any sale.”

2. The Ijevan–Aghstafa railway line

“It is necessary to examine the circumstances surrounding the dismantling or deterioration of railway infrastructure along a section of approximately 17km within Armenia. The investigation should assess whether the decisions taken in this regard were lawful and determine whether they caused damage to the state.”

3. Declining freight volumes

“According to published data, railway freight volumes fell significantly during South Caucasus Railway’s management of the network. It is necessary to compare the figures for 2008 with those from subsequent years, identify the reasons for the decline and establish whether poor management, failure to meet contractual obligations or other violations caused it.”

4. Reduction in the workforce

“It is necessary to examine the reasons behind the significant reduction in the number of employees, assess whether the company fulfilled its commitments and identify any possible violations during this process.”

5. Implementation of the concession agreement

“It is necessary to analyse the concession agreement signed in 2008, including its investment and other obligations, assess how the company has fulfilled them in practice, examine the effectiveness of state oversight and determine whether the company has lawfully maintained and used railway assets owned by Armenia.”

Aram Sargsyan stressed that the competent authorities must conduct a comprehensive and impartial investigation.

Russia seeks to retain Armenian railway concession as Yerevan avoids confrontation

Political analyst Samvel Meliksetyan believes Armenia has softened its stance to avoid “tough measures” from Russia. A joint working group will seek ways to resolve the dispute.

“The potential damage was inflicted on Armenia and, consequently, its citizens”

The politician believes the issue he has raised with law enforcement agencies is of critical importance. He says the authorities must first and foremost protect state property. He also stresses that the matter concerns Armenia’s economic security, the restoration of railway links and the country’s ability to realise its transit potential.

“The potential damage was inflicted on Armenia and, consequently, its citizens,” Sargsyan argues.

He has therefore asked the authorities to verify the facts that the prime minister presented in 2018 and report the findings of the investigation conducted at the time. He also expects law enforcement agencies to assess the five issues he has raised. If they uncover evidence of a criminal offence, he demands that they open a new criminal case.

Sargsyan says the authorities must establish the scale of the financial damage the state may have suffered and identify those responsible.

“If the authorities establish that a crime took place and caused damage to the state, they must take the measures required by law to secure compensation, recover property that was unlawfully disposed of or reclaim its value,” Sargsyan stressed.

He expects the prosecutor’s office to provide a written response outlining the investigation’s findings and the decisions it has taken.

—

Iranian ambassador to Armenia: We have serious concerns about TRIPP project

News.am, Armenia
Oct 30, 2026

Iranian ambassador to Armenia: We have serious concerns about TRIPP project

We have openly and clearly expressed our concerns regarding possible scenarios of the TRIPP project. At the same time, we are confident that we will be able to jointly manage any challenges in this regard in a constructive atmosphere. The Iranian ambassador to Armenia, Khalil Shirgholami, told this to reporters on Friday.

“It is important for us [i.e. Iran] that during the discussion of the TRIPP project or any other matter, the territorial integrity and national sovereignty of Armenia are respected. It is also important that no third party can create a challenge for the strategic relations between Armenia and Iran.

We will remain committed to this approach during the discussions and further work between the two countries. I am confident that as a result of constant contacts, we will be able to resolve any issue,” Shirgholami noted. He added that Iran wants a format to be created within the framework of which it will be possible to hold discussions with Armenia. According to the Iranian diplomat, this will help to resolve any problem very quickly as soon as it arises.

“We [i.e. Iran] do not have a biased approach, we have serious concerns. We expect assurances from Armenia that there will be no foreign forces on the border of Iran and Armenia, and no one will be able to create a threat to Iran in the border and adjacent territories.

Armenia’s officials have repeatedly assured at the highest level that there will be no such precedents. In this regard, we perceive mutual trust as a guarantee that this project will not deviate from its course and will not create a threat to Iran,” the Iranian diplomat emphasized.

He noted that the technical issues of the TRIPP project are under discussion, and it is important what mechanisms will be used during its implementation, since it is on the basis of these mechanisms that guarantees are formed that the principle of territorial integrity and national sovereignty of Armenia will be preserved within the framework of the project.

“These mechanisms should be a guarantee that no corridor will be created that is outside the jurisdiction of the country. Guarantees that there will be no foreign forces within the framework of this project are also important.

We [i.e. Iran] hope that the [Armenian] government will demonstrate a vigilant and cautious approach in developing these mechanisms, for the benefit of Armenia,” concluded the Iranian ambassador to Armenia.

—

India, Armenia Hold 12th Foreign Office Consultations, Review Bilateral Ties

Business World, India
Oct 30, 2026
The consultations covered high-level exchanges, institutional mechanisms and cooperation in trade and investment, science and technology, AI, education, counter-terrorism, culture and people-to-people ties

India and Armenia held the 12th round of Foreign Office Consultations (FOC) in New Delhi on 29 October, reviewing the entire spectrum of bilateral relations and discussing cooperation in areas including trade, investment, artificial intelligence (AI), science and technology, and counter-terrorism.

The Indian delegation was led by Secretary (West) in the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Ambassador Sibi George, while the Armenian side was headed by Deputy Foreign Minister Mnatsakan Safaryan, according to an MEA statement.

The consultations covered high-level exchanges, institutional mechanisms and cooperation in trade and investment, science and technology, AI, education, counter-terrorism, culture and people-to-people ties.

Both sides also exchanged views on regional and global developments of mutual interest, including cooperation in multilateral forums.

India and Armenia share friendly bilateral relations, marked by regular political and official-level exchanges. The two countries will mark the 35th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations in 2027.

The previous round of Foreign Office Consultations was held in Armenia on 7 November 2025.

During the latest meeting, both sides agreed to hold the next round of consultations in Armenia on a mutually convenient date.

—

Erasing Armenian Presence in Nagorno-Karabakh

The International Affairs Review
Oct 30, 2026

On August 8, 2025, Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders met at the White House and signed a joint declaration committing to peace after decades of conflict. Yet more than a year later, Armenian heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh remains under threat. Findings released in October 2026 documented four additional cases of destruction, four episodes of damage, and five newly threatened sites. Diplomatic progress has not yet translated into effective protection for the heritage left behind by displaced Armenians.

These losses deepen the consequences of their displacement. In September 2023, more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians were forcibly displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh following months of an Azerbaijani military offensive and blockade. Since their expulsion, Armenian cultural institutions have either been destroyed or presented as belonging to a different historical tradition. The removal of a community and the erasure of its heritage are distinct acts, but their consequences reinforce each other. One separates people from their homeland. The other threatens the evidence of their existence there. 

The destruction of religious and cultural sites deepens that displacement. Kanach Zham, a nineteenth-century Armenian church in Shushi, was still standing in December 2023. By April 2024, it was demolished. The historic Ghazanchetsots cemetery was intact at the beginning of the offensive and destroyed by April 2024, months after the fighting ended and the area was under Azerbaijani control.Four additional cases of destruction and  damage and five newly threatened sites were documented in findings released this October. Independent access is needed before more sites disappear, not merely afterward to establish what was lost. These sites are more than historic landmarks. Churches preserve memories of worship and community life. Cemeteries connect families to their ancestors. Their destruction eradicates connections to home, even while living elsewhere.

But a building does not have to be demolished for its history to be erased. Gandzasar monastery illustrates another danger. Its Cathedral of St. John the Baptist was built and consecrated in the early 13th century under Prince Hasan-Jalal Dawla. Medieval Armenian inscriptions record its patronage and construction. Yet during a government-organized diplomatic visit in September 2026, Azerbaijani officials presented Gandzasar and Dadivank as Caucasian Albanian heritage, accusing Armenians of conducting “unauthorized alterations” during the early years of the conflict.

Nakhichevan offers another warning. From 1997 to 2011, 108 of 110 Armenian monasteries, churches, and cemeteries were destroyed. Before their destruction, some of these churches were officially listed as “Albanian temples.” Relabeling did not protect them; it denied their Armenian origins before their eventual eradication.  Nagorno-Karabakh needs independent scrutiny before further losses make preservation impossible. Preserving its walls while rewriting its history would leave the building visible but erase its Armenian past. The displacement of people and the removal of their historical presence must therefore be addressed together.

 Having helped broker the August 2025 Washington declaration between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the United States should make heritage protection part of its diplomatic strategy in the region. UNESCO proposed an independent heritage mission after the 2020 ceasefire, but reported that December that it could not proceed because Azerbaijan did not provide the agreement needed for access. Washington should press Azerbaijan to allow independent experts access, support continued documentation, and seek safeguards for churches, cemeteries, khachkars, and inscriptions. UNESCO should lead the assessment and develop conservation recommendations. Displaced Armenians must also have a voice in decisions affecting these places. Their connection to their heritage did not end when they fled, and their absence should not exclude them from its future.

The U.S. government should support efforts to achieve meaningful peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan, while recognizing that diplomatic progress alone cannot resolve the consequences of ethnic cleansing. Meaningful peace would not only protect the rights and safety of displaced Armenians but also safeguard their cultural and religious heritage. These are essential conditions of a credible settlement. Nagorno-Karabakh’s Armenians have already lost access to their homes. They should not also lose their voice in shaping their future or the places that preserve their history.

Staff Editor: Leah Hollar

Managing Editor: Aidan Fernandes

U.S. Foreign PolicyDiplomacyArmeniaCultural Heritage
Aram Melkumyan, Staff Writer

Aram Melkumyan is a graduate student in the Master of International Policy and Practice program at George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs. He began his career in auditing and later held roles in financial consulting, central bank budgeting, and anti-money laundering compliance before pursuing graduate studies in international policy. He holds a Bachelor’s in Finance and a Master of Business Administration from the Armenian State University of Economics. You can find Aram’s LinkedIn here.

—

Education minister warns of fake account using her name and photo

Armenia13:59, 28 October 2026
Read the article in: Հայերեն

Armenia’s Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sport Zhanna Andreasyan has warned about a fake social media account using her name and photo to spread false information about the ministry’s activities.

In a Facebook post, Andreasyan urged citizens to be cautious and not respond to messages from the account.

Earlier, Armenian Parliament Speaker Ruben Rubinyan also warned about a fake account using his name and photo.

Read the article in: Հայերեն

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Fake WhatsApp and Telegram accounts opened in name of Armenian environment min

Armenia16:32, 28 October 2026
Read the article in: ՀայերենРусский

Fake WhatsApp and Telegram accounts have been created using the name of Environment Minister Hambardzum Matevosyan, the ministry’s spokesperson Ani Hakobyan has warned.

She urged people to remain vigilant, avoid responding to suspicious messages, sharing personal or official information, or making transfers, and to block and report the accounts.

Earlier, Armenian Parliament Speaker Ruben Rubinyan and Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sport Zhanna Andreasyan had also warned about fake social media accounts using their names and photos.

Published by Armenpress, original at

—

Armenia parliament ratifies US-backed TRIPP transit agreement

Intellinews
Oct 29, 2026

By IntelliNews October 28, 2026

Armenia’s parliament on October 28 ratified a framework agreement with the United States to develop the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP), a transit project intended to reopen regional connections and strengthen the South Caucasus country’s role in east-west trade.

The agreement, discussed by lawmakers on October 27, provides for the creation of a joint development company in which the United States will hold a 74% stake and Armenia 26% for an initial 49 years. If the partnership is extended for another 50 years, Armenia’s share will rise to 49% without additional investment, while the U.S. stake will fall to 51%, Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan told parliament.

Mirzoyan said the infrastructure would operate entirely under Armenian sovereignty, territorial integrity and jurisdiction, addressing concerns that the arrangement could compromise the country’s control over its territory.

The project would enable Armenia to connect with markets through Azerbaijan and its infrastructure, while allowing Azerbaijan to reach its Nakhichevan exclave through Armenian territory. It could also facilitate transit between third countries to the east and west.

The initiative forms part of Armenia’s broader “Crossroads of Peace” plan to restore regional transport links after decades of conflict and closed borders.

“Our goal is to turn Armenia from a wedge into a bridge,” ruling Civil Contract party lawmaker Arman Yeghoyan said during the debate.

Foreign Relations Committee chairman Sargis Khandanyan described the agreement as a historic opportunity, saying: “This is a historic project, taking into account the fact that for the first time since Armenia’s independence, the connection between Armenia and the world is opening, and Armenia is becoming a transit country.”

Opposition lawmakers challenged the agreement’s economic and security implications, with some arguing that implementation should wait until Armenia and Azerbaijan sign a peace treaty. The Armenia faction said it would vote against ratification, while representatives of Strong Armenia also opposed proceeding before a peace deal.

Parliament Speaker Ruben Rubinyan argued that the transit project need not depend on the signing and ratification of a peace treaty. He also stressed that TRIPP was an infrastructure business project, not a separate territory or extraterritorial zone.

The agreement comes amid efforts to normalise relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan following their decades-long conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh. Reopening transport routes could reshape regional trade and connectivity, while raising questions over border controls, security and the balance of influence between regional powers.

Armenian officials say the project offers economic and strategic benefits, while critics remain concerned about its implementation before a comprehensive peace settlement.

https://www.intellinews.com/armenia-parliament-ratifies-us-backed-tripp-transit-agreement-479799/?source=armenia

—