U.S., Azerbaijan and Armenia step up efforts to advance TRIPP

KazInform
Nov 7, 2026

The United States, Azerbaijan and Armenia have launched trilateral technical planning groups to accelerate the implementation of the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP), according to a joint statement issued by the three governments on November 6 and published by the U.S. Department of State, Trend reports.

According to the statement, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Brendan Hanrahan, Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Vahan Kostanyan, and Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister Elnur Mammadov launched the work of technical groups to advance the project.

It is noted that this cooperation will contribute to ensuring long-term stability, economic vitality, regional connectivity, and commercial prosperity across the region. Furthermore, it is reported that this initiative underscores the landmark the landmark August 8, 2025, Peace Summit Declaration brokered by President Trump.

At the initial stage, the parties agreed to establish two technical planning groups, which will address issues related to transport and electricity transmission.

These groups will facilitate the resolution of complex technical issues and moving to the next phases of implementation, including connection with other regional infrastructures.

The parties reaffirmed their commitment to implementing all components of the TRIPP project as soon as possible.

Earlier, Qazinform reported, Armenia and Azerbaijan signed a historic peace deal at the White House.

—

Former Armenian ruling party MP elected president of Constitutional Court

OC Media
Nov 6, 2026

Vladimir Vardanyan, a former MP and member of the ruling Civil Contract party, was elected president of Armenia’s Constitutional Court on Friday, months after joining the court as a judge. All of the court’s judges have been appointed during Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s rule.

Vardanyan’s controversial appointments, first as a Constitutional Court judge and now as its president, add to broader concerns about the independence of Armenia’s judiciary.

Vardanyan and Constitutional Court Vice-President Edgar Shatiryan were the only candidates for the position.

Friday’s vote marked the second round of the election. The two candidates had previously faced off on 14 October, but neither secured the required number of votes in either round of the secret ballot.

Following the results of the vote, Shatiryan announced his resignation for the post of Vice-President of Armenia’s highest court, considering ‘it impossible to continue serving in the position’, but added that he will continue to serve as a judge in the same court.

Under the constitution, the Constitutional Court elects its president from among its judges for a six-year term. The previous president, Arman Dilanyan, completed his term on 12 October but will continue to serve as a judge of the court.

The election has prompted criticism over Vardanyan’s previous political affiliation and concerns about the court’s independence.

Advertisement

Discover more
Caucasus news updates
Website building service
Media advertising space

‘So how can we now turn to the Constitutional Court with any conviction or confidence?’, Artur Sakunts of the Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly Vanadzor Office wrote on Facebook.

Levon Barseghyan, chair of the board of the Journalists’ Club Asparez, described the election as ‘yet another disgrace’.

Vardanyan was elected as a Constitutional Court judge in a secret parliamentary vote in March 2026. Some media outlets had previously speculated that the authorities were also considering him for the court’s presidency.

Ex-member of Armenian ruling party elected to Constitutional Court amidst concerns of bias

Vardanyan had held various positions at the Constitutional Court since 2003, most recently serving as its head of staff from April 2018. In 2019, he was elected to parliament, initially representing the ruling My Step alliance before joining Civil Contract in 2021.

From 2019, Vardanyan chaired parliament’s Committee on State and Legal Affairs. Ahead of his appointment to the Constitutional Court, he terminated his membership in Civil Contract.

His appointment as a judge then drew criticism from civil society organisations over his previous affiliation with the ruling party.

Ahead of the March vote, 14 organisations issued a joint statement calling on parliament ‘to refrain from electing’ Vardanyan.

They argued that Armenia’s legislation and constitution prohibit Constitutional Court judges from being affiliated with political parties or engaging in political activity, and further underscored that Vardanyan’s decision to terminate his party membership was insufficient, pointing to his active involvement in politics for more than seven years.

They also drew parallels with the appointment of Hrayr Tovmasyan, a former member of the then-ruling Republican Party, who was elected to the Constitutional Court in 2018, during former President Serzh Sargsyan’s tenure.

The same political affiliation was criticised at the time by then-opposition MP Pashinyan.

—

Armenia assessed the economic consequences of leaving the EAEU

Oreanda, Russia
Nov 6, 2026
OREANDA-NEWS  Withdrawal from the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) will not lead to serious consequences for Armenia. This was stated by the Minister of Economy of the post-Soviet republic Gevorg Papoyan, quoted by Interfax.

In this scenario, Armenia’s GDP growth rate will slow down by 0.65 percentage points, he expects. This will happen if Armenia withdraws from the EAEU, and there will be no other negative factors, Papoyan stressed.

A possible increase in the price of natural gas supplied to Armenia from Russia could lead to much more serious consequences, he explained. Papoyan warned that if the terms of the current long-term agreement are renegotiated, the slowdown in the republic’s economic growth may amount to at least 5 percentage points (pp).

The increase in the price of imported gas was included by the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council in the list of potential risks that Armenia may face in the event of the republic’s withdrawal from the EAEU. Analysts also included a rapid drop in trade turnover with the countries of the association and the loss of a significant part of GDP in the list of possible threats.

Despite this, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan once again assured the EAEU of the immutability of its course towards rapprochement with Europe. The country’s authorities, he stressed, will continue to work on the diversification of foreign trade relations in order to reduce dependence on the Russian market. The leadership of the European Union (EU) promised to help him with this.

—

Galt & Taggart publishes new research on Armenia’s economy, expanding its reg

OC Media
Nov 6, 2026

Galt & Taggart has published an in-depth study of Armenia’s economy, titled Armenia: Turning Opportunities into Growth. The report marks another milestone in the development of the company’s regional research. Following its report on the Uzbekistan economy, Galt & Taggart is expanding its research coverage to another country in the region, offering investors independent, in-depth analysis of Armenia.

The report provides a detailed overview of Armenia’s macroeconomic environment and the key drivers of its economic growth. It is a valuable resource for current and prospective investors in Armenia, as well as for asset managers, financial institutions, and other capital market participants assessing the country’s economic potential and investment opportunities.

According to Galt & Taggart’s research, Armenia’s economy has been growing rapidly since 2022, with real GDP growth averaging 8.5% a year in 2022–2025 and reaching 7.1% in 2025. Relocation of companies and capital boosted consumer and investment spending and lifted the central bank’s international reserves to a record high. Between 2021 and 2025, nominal GDP more than doubled from $13.9 billion to $29.3 billion, and GDP per capita from $4,750 to $9,495.

Between 2016 and 2025, the share of agriculture in the economy declined, while the share of services increased: financial services rose from 4.9% to 10.8% of GDP and trade from 10.9% to 16.1%. IT exports grew nearly fivefold from 2021, reaching $1.8 billion in 2025.

Construction and real estate also supported growth, with apartment sales reaching a record in 2025. Challenges include Russia’s restrictions on imports of some Armenian products. At the same time, new opportunities are emerging: borders are gradually opening, a new transit route is planned, and the European Union has expanded its support for Armenia. A new gold mine has started production and is expected to generate $860–$900 million of export revenue a year, and Firebird’s AI data center has opened, with a total planned investment of $5 billion. Together, these developments should support growth in the coming years.

‘Galt & Taggart is already a trusted partner for investors in Georgia, and our goal is to become one across the wider region. To achieve this, it is important to provide investors with in-depth information on the economies of the region and to offer a full range of investment services. Our new research on Armenia is another step in this direction, strengthening our position in the investment markets of the Caucasus and Central Asia,’ says Giorgi Kuparashvili, CEO of Galt & Taggart.

‘We are consistently expanding our research coverage and producing high-quality, in-depth analysis of the region’s economies. The Armenia report continues this strategy. Our aim is to provide investors not merely with a general economic overview, but with detailed analysis that helps them better assess market dynamics, key trends, and investment opportunities,’ says Eva Bochorishvili, Head of Research at Galt & Taggart.

Galt & Taggart’s research and investment banking work has been recognised internationally. In 2026, Euromoney named Galt & Taggart the Best in Georgia for Research and Brokerage, while Global Finance named it Best Investment Bank in Georgia.


—

Azerbaijani Press: Who has stepped on Iran’s tail? Armenia could be the next

Today Press, Azerbaijan
Nov 7, 2026

Strong remarks by Ali Akbar Velayati, adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader on international affairs, directed at Armenia have heightened tensions in the region. Opposing the TRIPP project, Velayati issued stern threats against the United States and its allies. He accused Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan of moving closer to the West and described the project as contrary to Tehran’s security interests.

Velayati said Iran considers the security of the South Caucasus its responsibility and views the TRIPP project as a red line. Emphasising that he had warned the Armenian ambassador, he said: “If Trump and his allies try to cross this red line of Iran’s, we will break their legs”.

What is happening between Yerevan and Tehran? Given Armenia’s rapprochement with Türkiye and Azerbaijan, could Iran’s position be viewed as an indirect move against Azerbaijan?

Speaking to TodayPress TV , political analyst Shakir Aghayev said Velayati’s threats over the TRIPP project were a continuation of Iran’s longstanding position:

“This was an expected reaction from Iran. Tehran has opposed this route from the very beginning. Velayati’s statement also shows that Iran intends to prevent the project from being implemented. It has even been reported that a warning was issued to the Armenian embassy in advance”.

He believes the main targets of Iran’s threats are the companies that will take part in the project:

“Iran’s threat is aimed directly at intimidating those companies. They know that during the war between the United States, Israel and Iran, Tehran targeted areas hosting US and Israeli military bases and their facilities. Iran has already tested this approach. That is why it is trying to deter companies from joining the project, investing in it or taking part in its implementation. This is because an American company will play the leading role in carrying out the project”.

According to the analyst, Tehran is portraying the project as a threat both to its own security and to Armenia’s:

“Iran is firmly opposed to the implementation of the Zangezur Corridor, or the TRIPP project, and wants to prevent it by all possible means. This complicates the security situation. Iran’s message is also a warning to Armenia. If a war between the United States and Iran breaks out again, that part of Yerevan could also become a target, as the area may be regarded as an American economic zone”.

The political analyst, however, considers the possibility of Azerbaijan and Türkiye being directly threatened by Iran unlikely:

“Azerbaijan has already stated that Iran cannot threaten either Türkiye or Azerbaijan, because it is well aware of the strength of both states. The main responsibility here lies with the United States and Armenia. Azerbaijan has almost completed the work on its section of the Zangezur Corridor. The more than 40-kilometre stretch passing through Armenian territory, however, falls under Yerevan’s responsibility. Implementing the project and ensuring security in that area are Armenia’s obligations, because it was Armenia, not Azerbaijan, that signed the contracts with the companies”.

Jala Rovshan


—

The power that rules Armenia from Baku – why is the name Aliyev mentioned so

Global info, Azerbaijan
Nov 6, 2026

The power that rules Armenia from Baku – why is the name Aliyev mentioned so often there?

After the Second Karabakh War (27 September – 10 November 2020), the military-political situation in the South Caucasus changed significantly. A new phase began in terms of Azerbaijan’s position, territorial control, military potential and regional diplomatic capabilities.

This issue can be analysed in several dimensions: military power, economic capacity, political-diplomatic position, foreign allies and the comparative balance of forces with Armenia. Across these categories Azerbaijan is incomparably superior to Armenia.

Changes in Azerbaijan’s position

At the end of the Patriotic War that began in 2020, Azerbaijan restored control over part of its territories and the war was halted by the 10 November statement. The event caused jubilation in Azerbaijan; people poured into the squares and streets to celebrate the Victory. In Armenia, by contrast, an angry crowd stormed Nikol Pashinyan’s office, seeking to punish him. The Armenian public had understood that the 10 November agreement was a document of capitulation for Armenia. Having sung the “Great Armenia” chorus from a high podium for nearly 30 years, Armenians were shaken by the outcome of the first stage of the Second Karabakh War.

Azerbaijan then expanded state control over the territory and the military-political situation in Karabakh changed. After the anti-terror operation Azerbaijan conducted on 19-20 September 2023, the separatist entity in Karabakh ceased to function. Finally, in April 2024 the Russian peacekeeping contingent was withdrawn from Azerbaijan. As a result, Azerbaijan effectively secured state sovereignty over every part of its internationally recognised territory.

What changed in six years?

Thus, covering a great distance over the past six years, Azerbaijan not only strengthened its position in the region but became an actor with a say in the international arena. By ending the fact of occupation, President Ilham Aliyev carried Azerbaijan to far superior positions. One important point here is that the ironic attitude towards Azerbaijan in Armenia changed fundamentally. Before the war, the rhetoric of Armenian officials and politicians went like this: “We will drink tea in Baku”, “We will advance as far as Yevlakh”, “The Azerbaijani flag can fly in Stepanakert only if an embassy opens there”, “Karabakh is Armenia, full stop”, and so on. This rhetoric, and the attitude to the Azerbaijani factor as a whole, changed radically after the Victory. And not only in Armenia, but across the CIS area, the region and the South Caucasus.

After 2020 there was also a change in Azerbaijan’s diplomatic position. The restoration of sovereignty over Karabakh created a strategic alliance with Turkey, energy exports and international economic ties, a strategic geographic position in terms of the Caspian Sea and the Middle Corridor, and opportunities to take part in regional transport projects. This, in turn, increased the possibilities of Armenia, a landlocked country. It laid completely bare how much Armenia needs Azerbaijan and Turkey. Armenia understood that enmity with the two Turkic states and territorial claims against them do not make it bigger but, on the contrary, smaller, and limit its opportunities.

Armenia’s main difficulties

The difficulties are many. For example, its lack of access to the sea, the long closure of its borders with Turkey and Azerbaijan, economic and transport restrictions, and the need to rebuild its military security strategy after 2020 and 2023 have placed the country in an even more disadvantageous position.

The “Aliyev constitution”

Armenia has found itself in a situation where, on almost every issue from foreign policy to domestic processes, it is dependent on Azerbaijan. Baku did not create this situation by force, and there is no attempt to do so. Yerevan itself has found itself in this situation. Things have reached the point where, in Armenia, the decisive factor — from the election process to domestic social and political processes — is Azerbaijan and Ilham Aliyev. In political discussions and public debate in Armenia, the Azerbaijani President’s surname is heard and mentioned more often than the name of Armenia’s prime minister.

Armenia is preparing to adopt a new constitution. The opposition calls it the “Aliyev constitution”. That is, a view has taken hold that the new constitutional provisions are being dictated from Baku. Naturally, this is not the case. What does a conclusion born of the situation in Armenia have to do with us? But the reality is that Baku has repeatedly stated that the provision in the Armenian constitution reflecting territorial claims against Azerbaijan must be removed from the constitution, otherwise a peace agreement will not be signed.

Azerbaijan’s Karabakh Victory was also a liberation for Armenia. For years the fact of occupation kept it from escaping the deadlock. Small Armenia, stuck in the middle of the Turkic area, struggled as a hostage to “great” claims. Rotten ideas and senseless stubbornness prevented the country from joining gigantic geopolitical processes and the international economic chain.

After the 44-day war, the topic of the Zangezur corridor came to the fore. At first these discussions caused concern in Armenia. The Armenian public could not see the big picture. The project was presented as an occupation factor — as if Azerbaijan were going to attack Zangezur. This propaganda campaign had certain behind-the-scenes aspects. They wanted to have Azerbaijan recognised as an occupier country and to weaken its position.

On 8 August 2025, after the leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a Joint Declaration with the participation of the US president, the rhetoric changed. Armenia began speaking enthusiastically about the creation of the TRIPP transport project.

Six years ago these days, Ilham Aliyev, as President and Supreme Commander-in-Chief, did not only bring victory to his own country. He brought peace and calm to the South Caucasus. He uprooted separatism, ended the occupation and eliminated injustice. He saved the Armenian people from the slavery of the separatists and from the revanchist disease of the Kocharyan-Sargsyan tandem.

Azar Aykhan
Globalinfo.az

—

Divorce rates are rising in Armenia: divorced women and experts explain why

JAM News
Nov 6, 2026
  • Tigranuhi Martirosyan
  • Yerevan

For some, divorce means a painful separation; for others, it is a happy “liberation” from each other. Either way, former spouses remain part of each other’s lives, albeit in a different capacity.

For some, divorce marks the beginning of a new life. For others, it leads to a prolonged struggle, with endless disputes over issues such as property division and access to their children. Mutual accusations often accompany the process.

In Armenia, divorce can also spark heated public debate. This can be a real ordeal, particularly for women.

Women who have divorced told JAMnews why they decided to end their relationships. Experts offered their explanations for the rise in divorce rates in recent years.


  • Why are Armenian women marrying foreigners more often? Stories of three families
  • Demand for surrogacy on the rise in Armenia
  • More Armenian women embrace entrepreneurship: Which industries are they entering?

“When you realise nothing can be saved”

Juliette Babayan is 38. She separated from her husband after 15 years together and has been raising their two sons on her own for the past two years. She says divorce had always seemed like a last resort:

“When I got married, I could never have imagined that one day I would have to make such a decision. But when a relationship reaches a dead end, there is no other way out. My children were no longer very young at the time. When we divorced, one was 12 and the other 14. They had seen our arguments and the tension between us. Then one day I realised it was better for them to see us apart, living separately but happy, rather than together and miserable.”

She felt that people around her did not understand how difficult it was to decide to divorce:

“But that is not how it works. You do not decide to separate in a minute. You think about it for a long time and give each other another chance. But when you realise there is no other way out and nothing left to save, you eventually reach that decision. Everything good has a beginning and an end. Once you come to terms with that, separation becomes easier to bear.”

She explains that women face both practical and psychological challenges after divorce. She notes that many women in Armenia face hostility from their former husbands and their families, who accuse them of “breaking up the family”.

She is happy with her relationship with her ex-husband. He provides financial support, pays child maintenance and often spends time with their children.

“I believe both parents have equal rights, both during a relationship and after it ends. I respect my children’s father and stay in touch with him. It is very important to me that the children feel both parents are present in their lives and take part in them. I want to make sure they never feel they have no mother or no father, even if we no longer live together,” Juliette says.

“I got married for life”

Araksi Poghosyan is 40. She married at 23 and separated from her husband after 11 years of marriage. She says it is impossible to explain in a few words why they divorced. But after thinking for a moment, she adds: “We no longer loved each other.”

She insists that they tried to save their marriage and decided to divorce only when they realised there was no other way:

“People talk about divorce more than ever now, especially on social media. Many think it is easy to make such a decision. But it isn’t. I belong to a generation that married believing it was ‘for life, until death do us part’. It was very difficult for me to accept that reality had turned out differently and that I needed to get divorced. It took me around three years to reach that decision. I worked with a psychologist and tried to get back on my feet financially because I was leaving with my son, who was seven at the time. I had no idea what would happen next or how I would manage.”

She explains that women face both practical and psychological challenges after divorce. She notes that many women in Armenia face hostility from their former husbands and their families, who accuse them of “breaking up the family”.

She is happy with her relationship with her ex-husband. He provides financial support, pays child maintenance and often spends time with their children.

“I believe both parents have equal rights, both during a relationship and after it ends. I respect my children’s father and stay in touch with him. It is very important to me that the children feel both parents are present in their lives and take part in them. I want to make sure they never feel they have no mother or no father, even if we no longer live together,” Juliette says.

“I got married for life”

Araksi Poghosyan is 40. She married at 23 and separated from her husband after 11 years of marriage. She says it is impossible to explain in a few words why they divorced. But after thinking for a moment, she adds: “We no longer loved each other.”

She insists that they tried to save their marriage and decided to divorce only when they realised there was no other way:

“People talk about divorce more than ever now, especially on social media. Many think it is easy to make such a decision. But it isn’t. I belong to a generation that married believing it was ‘for life, until death do us part’. It was very difficult for me to accept that reality had turned out differently and that I needed to get divorced. It took me around three years to reach that decision. I worked with a psychologist and tried to get back on my feet financially because I was leaving with my son, who was seven at the time. I had no idea what would happen next or how I would manage.”

Statistics and reasons

According to official statistics, the number of marriages in Armenia has fallen in recent years, while the number of divorces has risen:

  • 2022 – 16,795 marriages and 4,525 divorces (26.9%)
  • 2023 – 16,330 marriages and 4,525 divorces (27.5%)
  • 2024 – 15,324 marriages and 4,689 divorces (30.5%)
  • 2025 – 13,821 marriages and 4,881 divorces (35.3%)

Domestic violence, infidelity, financial difficulties and everyday problems are commonly cited as reasons for divorce.

“In the past, couples who had been married for many years tended to divorce. Now, even those who have been married for just three or four years are splitting up. The main reasons for divorce are arguments, accounting for 50%; incompatibility, 14%; and going abroad for work, 8%,” says Tsovinar Harutyunyan, a development and demography expert who has held senior positions at the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).

However, some psychologists say these factors have taken a back seat in recent years.

Family psychologist Naira Kharatyan says most of her female clients cite their husbands’ indifference as the reason for seeking a divorce. She believes women marry for love, but men become less attentive as the years go by:

“Women mostly say they feel neglected and that their partners have become indifferent towards them. Marriage is not just about everyday life and money; it is also about emotions and psychological connection. Women want to feel heard and understood.

“The second reason I would highlight is unmet expectations. Women have certain expectations of marriage, and when these are not fulfilled, they become disappointed. Another factor is unspoken competition within the couple. When a woman earns more or holds a higher position, a man may feel jealous. As a result, they stop acting as a couple and become unspoken rivals, each waiting to see who will win.”

Arus, 37 (not her real name, at her request), says that nowadays women “do not marry for money”.

In her words, “women marry for love and divorce because it is no longer there”. This is what happened to her. Arus left her husband after 13 years of marriage, taking their two children with her.

“My husband subjected me to psychological abuse. He put pressure on me and humiliated me. In the last few years, he did not earn any money. I was the only one working. But he told me I was worthless and that nobody wanted me. He told the children I was a bad mother. He said I could not even cook a decent meal. He did not feel like a proper man and wanted to crush me and humiliate me too. When I stood up to him, he threatened to beat me and take the children away,” she says.

While preparing this article, we spoke to many women who had experienced physical and psychological abuse. But all of them, like Arus, refused to speak on camera. They explained that they feared their former husbands might start harassing them.

“It took everything I had to get away from my husband. I am finally living in peace. Now, if he sees me on screen talking about him, he will turn up again and demand answers,” Arus says.

She adds that her former husband provides no support. She does not need financial help from him and wants no further contact with him.

“On my way home from work, I would pick up the children from nursery and school, get home and make dinner. He would come home in the evening, throw his lunch in the bin or spit into it. He would say it was inedible and that I had never learned how to run a household,” Arus says through tears.

The mother-in-law factor

Psychologist Naira Kharatyan argues that mothers can also contribute to the breakdown of their sons’ marriages:

“When sons remain overly attached to their mothers from childhood, they struggle to build strong families of their own. They have wives, but they listen to their mothers and follow their advice. Mothers encourage this dynamic without realising that they are creating a problem. As a result, the woman and the man never truly become a couple. A mother should tell her son: you are married now, and you must make decisions together with your wife. But in many cases, we see men whose wives were chosen for them, whose marriages their families arranged, and whose mothers then interfered in raising their children. The man never grew up.”

She says the “mother-son-daughter-in-law triangle can lead to tragic consequences”. Even when young couples do not live with their parents, the bond can remain so strong that the man still struggles to establish an independent family life.

Psychologist Mariam Manukyan also believes that marriage is more than a union between two people. She notes that the institution of marriage has acquired new dimensions and meanings over the centuries:

“It is a relationship in which two different people’s habits and ideas about life come together. When people enter a relationship, they begin to go through different stages. At the first stage, for example, a couple learns to share everyday responsibilities. At the second stage, after the birth of a child, they become parents and learn how to raise a child. This can also trigger a crisis and become a challenge for young couples. Relationships go through many such stages and crises. When couples fail to resolve them and the problems deepen, they separate because divorce becomes the only possible solution.”

At the same time, divorce brings new problems for many people. Couples struggle to agree on the terms of separation, while disputes arise over child custody, maintenance payments and the division of property.

“I divorced four years ago, and in all that time I have probably spent just four hours having proper conversations with my children. After the divorce, their father decided that they should stay with him. He wanted to punish me, and he succeeded. The court awarded him custody. We spent four years fighting in court. Eventually, the guardianship authority, which decides which parent the children should live with, concluded that staying with their father was in their best interests.

“My former husband’s close relatives work on that council, and its head is one of his friends. They knew what kind of mother I was and how attentive I had always been to my children, but… For four years, I collected documents to prove that I was a good mother so that my children could live with me. But no one cared about the children’s interests. They cared about my former husband’s interests,” says Susanna (not her real name, at her request).

All the women we interviewed on this subject agree on one thing: divorce does not always end on the day two people decide to stop living together. They also say that society often judges divorced women without considering what led them to make that decision.

“It is easier to talk about the importance of keeping a family together than to consider what it takes to achieve that. A family is not simply people living under one roof. It is also an environment where a child learns what love means, how people treat each other, what women and men deserve, and whether it is possible to live without fear,” one divorced woman says.

—

Armenia takes a step closer to EU with launch of biometric passport system

JAM News
Nov 7, 2026
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Armenia launched a new system for issuing biometric passports on 1 November. The system fully complies with international standards. The Armenian authorities say its introduction marks the most significant reform under the country’s visa liberalisation process with the European Union.

Marta Kos, the European Commissioner for Enlargement, wrote on Facebook that the new passports would make border crossings easier for travellers. She also stressed that Armenian citizens had moved one step closer to visa-free travel to EU countries.

“Armenia is choosing closer ties with Europe, and we are working to make this choice benefit its citizens,” Kos said.

The private company HayPass will provide the new services. The relevant government agencies assure citizens that this partnership will deliver high-quality services and secure, reliable documents.

The new system has moved the entire document application process from paper to digital format. Applicants can submit their applications and complete preliminary registration online. They then receive a QR code by email and must visit a service centre at their appointed time to verify their documents and personal details.

At the centre, staff take photographs and fingerprints and record signature samples. Applicants can collect their biometric passports from the same centre 14 days later.

The biometric passport will remain valid for 10 years and cost 28,650 drams ($80). The government plans to introduce discounts for certain social groups, although it has yet to specify how much of the cost it will cover.

The authorities do not require citizens to replace their existing passports with biometric ones. People can continue using their current passports until they expire.


  • Preferential regime for Armenian exports to EU in response to Russian restrictions
  • Opinion: ‘Moscow’s main fear is that Armenia will choose European Union’
  • Armenia begins shift from Russia towards EU – but finish line remains distant

Which other documents will become biometric?

The Interior Ministry has announced that several other types of documents will also become biometric, in addition to passports:

  • Identity cards (IDs);
  • Diplomatic passports;
  • Residence permits;
  • Identity cards and passports for stateless persons;
  • Identity cards and travel documents issued to refugees under international conventions.

The risk of document forgery will be minimal

The Interior Ministry says the introduction of the biometric passport system will help address several issues at once. These include:

  • Ensuring reliable identity verification;
  • Reducing the risk of document forgery or the use of another person’s personal data.

Nelly Davtyan, head of the Migration and Citizenship Service, says the new system will minimise the risk of forgery at every stage, from data processing at service centres to the production of the actual document:

“The previous system depended entirely on human factors. As a result, during the preparatory stage, we identified numerous inaccuracies in the State Population Register.”

Davtyan believes a biometric passport is more than just an identity document. It also provides an important safeguard for a person’s legal rights:

“The particular value of the new system lies in the fact that international standards guarantee the establishment, identification and mutual recognition of a person’s legal status worldwide. This is not simply our assessment. We built the entire system in strict compliance with these standards.”

‘Historic moment’: EU hands Armenia visa liberalisation action plan

It is still unclear when the visa liberalisation process will be completed. Neither the Armenian authorities nor EU officials have set a specific timeline, but both emphasise that the process is moving at an accelerated pace.

Gold-number passports to go on sale at auction

Armenia also plans to introduce a scheme offering “special” passport numbers, known as “gold numbers”. Some of these will go on sale at auction.

“We will launch the programme next year using two approaches. Passports with repeating digits will cost more, while numbers with ‘special’ combinations will go on sale at auction,” Nelly Davtyan said.

Faster service at HayPass offices: 3–5 minutes instead of 25

HayPass received 7,700 applications within just a few days. Some 2,700 people have already visited the company’s offices and completed the first stage of the process by submitting their biometric data.

According to Nelly Davtyan, head of the Migration and Citizenship Service, the previous document application process took 25 minutes. The new system allows applicants to complete registration in just 3–5 minutes:

“For all 2,700 citizens who have already used the service, data processing took no more than five minutes.”

Staff from the Migration and Citizenship Service have also visited regional branches. They say these offices are operating normally and have no queues either.

“This does not mean that we are providing fewer services. It means that we can now handle a much higher volume of applications,” Davtyan stressed.

Company has already invested €20 million

Interior Minister Arpine Sargsyan said the private partner, HayPass, had already invested €20 million in the project and continued to invest in it. She also stressed that citizens pay the private company 28,650 drams for a biometric passport and 5,950 drams for the accompanying identity card. These payments cover the company’s services. The state, she said, makes no profit from them.

The minister also rejected claims that the company receives payments for its services from both the state budget and citizens.

“We do not pay HayPass any money. Nothing has been paid from the state budget,” she assured.

HayPass operates 14 offices across the country

On 1 November, the first day of biometric data collection, HayPass opened service centres in two Yerevan shopping malls: Yerevan Mall and Mega Mall. Twelve regional branches began operating the following day.

Interior Minister Arpine Sargsyan said the government plans to increase the number of service centres to 23 by March 2027.

“Overall, we will have two branches in each region,” the minister said.

—

Wars end, but nature’s wounds remain. Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of I

News.am, Armenia
Nov 7, 2026

NEWS.am presents the article By Khalil Shirgholami, Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Republic of Armenia on the occasion of the international day for preventing the exploitation of the environment in war and armed conflict – November 6

Wars do not only claim human lives. Forests go up in flames, city skies disappear beneath thick clouds of black smoke, coastlines become contaminated with oil, and ecosystems that have developed over thousands of years can be devastated in a matter of moments. Amid images of destruction and reports of casualties, nature is often overlooked—a silent victim whose wounds, unlike the sounds of gunfire, do not disappear when the fighting ends.

November 6, the International Day for Preventing the Exploitation of the Environment in War and Armed Conflict, provides an opportunity to draw attention to one of the less visible consequences of warfare: environmental destruction that knows no political boundaries and whose effects may persist for generations. For Iran, this is no longer a theoretical concern, but a reality experienced during the military aggression by the United States and the Israeli regime in the twelve-day war of 2025 and the forty-day war of 2026.

According to official estimates by Iran’s Department of Environment, nearly 16,000 hectares of natural landscapes and environmentally protected areas were damaged during these two wars—an area equivalent to more than 22,000 football fields. The environmental damage has been estimated at over 25 trillion tomans. Yet behind these figures lie burned forests, damaged habitats, and disrupted natural cycles that may take decades to recover.

One of the most disturbing images of the war was Tehran’s darkened sky following attacks on oil storage facilities. According to Iran’s Department of Environment, during the forty-day war, more than 360,000 cubic metres of petroleum products caught fire in storage tanks in Tehran, resulting in emissions of nearly one million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, along with thousands of tonnes of other pollutants. Such pollution does not remain confined to the sites of the explosions; its consequences can extend far beyond them, affecting both human health and the environment.

But the war did not only darken Iran’s skies. The waters of the Persian Gulf were also affected. According to Iran’s Department of Environment, approximately 240 kilometres of coastline in Hormozgan Province were contaminated with petroleum substances. Oil slicks reached the shores of the protected island of Shidvar, while published images showed wildlife covered in oil. Contamination was also recorded along the coasts of Qeshm and Hengam, areas that are home to some of the Persian Gulf’s most valuable marine and coastal ecosystems.

Forests and protected natural areas were not spared either. During the forty-day war alone, 13 areas managed by Iran’s Department of Environment across seven provinces sustained damage. Every hectare of forest or grassland lost represents more than the destruction of a natural landscape; it is a loss of the planet’s capacity to absorb carbon, protect soil, and sustain plant and animal life.

These losses raise a fundamental question for the international community: Who bears responsibility for the damage that war inflicts on nature and the future of generations to come? International humanitarian law and the principles adopted by the United Nations International Law Commission in 2022 provide frameworks for protecting the environment in relation to armed conflicts. However, the effective implementation of these rules, the documentation of environmental damage, and the pursuit of accountability and reparations continue to require greater attention from the international community.

The Islamic Republic of Iran emphasizes the need for independent, science-based assessments of the environmental consequences of military attacks, as well as stronger international mechanisms for accountability and compensation. Environmental protection must not become a secondary concern overshadowed by military and political calculations. Damage to the environment ultimately threatens human health, ecological security, and the shared future of humanity.

Wars may come to an end, cities may be rebuilt, and life may return to the streets. Yet a burned forest, a polluted sea, or a damaged ecosystem may bear the scars for decades.

True peace is not merely the silence of weapons; it also means safeguarding the conditions necessary for future generations to live and thrive.


—

Armenian National Committee Calls to Reject Turkey’s Candidate for UN Secretar

Aurora News
Nov 7, 2026
ANNA

07.11.2026 11:27

The Armenian National Committee has appealed to the members of the UN Security Council and the governments of member states, urging them not to support Turkey’s nomination of Feridun Sinirlioğlu for the position of UN Secretary-General.

The Committee expressed concern over Sinirlioğlu’s previous activities, accusing him of denying the Armenian Genocide and promoting Turkey’s political interests. The statement also referenced a letter he signed in 2020 as Turkey’s permanent representative to the UN, in which, according to the Armenian National Committee, he denied the Armenian Genocide and refuted reports regarding the involvement of foreign mercenaries during the Artsakh war.

The Committee has also questioned Sinirlioğlu’s political independence and impartiality, asserting that his actions do not align with the expectations for the UN Secretary-General position. The Armenian National Committee has called on UN member countries to reject his nomination and demanded that Sinirlioğlu publicly clarify his past stance on the Armenian Genocide.

—