Category: News

Violations, use of administrative resources, targeting of the opposition. similar records were made not only by the opposition circles, but also by various representatives of the observation missions monitoring the elections in Armenia.

On June 14, the Central Electoral Commission will publish the final results of the elections, and before that, we were informed that the PAP, “Wings of Unity” and “Armenia” bloc applied to the CEC for a recount.

After June 14, a five-day period for appeals has already been planned, and on June 19, political forces can apply to the Constitutional Court. After the absence of an appeal or the approval of the Constitutional Court, the process of allocating mandates will begin, ahead of the first session of the Parliament.

Human rights defender, lawyer Hovhannes Khudoyan recorded obvious violations in the pre-election and electoral process. 168:․am-in the conversation with, he specifically mentioned:

“The elections were not fair, objective, obviously, because even before the pre-election campaign, double standards were used, the government constantly gave charities outside of budget planning, forbade others to do so, they eavesdropped on everyone, many people were arrested on frivolous charges. There was a total abuse of administrative resources and in the background of all this, these results that we see also suggest that.

And the CEC turned a blind eye to the shortcomings. During the examination of Aram Sargsyan’s application, we learned that, for example, similar applications were also submitted by the “Strong Armenia” party, but they were not examined urgently and even today they have not been examined, but other complaints were examined as a matter of urgency.”

In any case, according to Hovhannes Khudoyan, the opposition, regardless of any emotional reactions, should not give up those tools that may be suitable for further struggle.

“It’s another question, how efficiently can the tools be used,” added the human rights defender, noting, “If, for example, the PAP also passes, then the CP does not get a constitutional majority.”

According to Hovhannes Khudoyan, this is perhaps not the desired result, but it is necessary in the perspective of somehow resisting the actions against Armenia.

Will the records of international observation missions be able to change the situation and, for example, create an objective picture of the level of democracy in Armenia in their own countries – we asked the human rights defender.

In response, he recorded: “There was interference in the elections of Armenia from all possible sides, but what is the problem? those countries intervene for the interests of their countries, based on their policies, and the government is constrained by that help, because they fix these violations, but then every time they will turn those violations against the government in order to extract something from Armenia.

In other words, by committing these criminal acts, this government makes itself vulnerable. Those countries fix it, but they don’t fix it for the sake of democracy and human rights, but they fix it as a club on the head of these authorities in order to make extortions for their interests in the future.

—

Doctor of political science, professor, energy security expert Vahe Davtyan writes. “Political forces continue to practice law instead of politics.

They continue to measure reality by legal norms, persistently ignoring political principles and laws.

This is the reason why the opinion that the political struggle is practically absent in Armenia is hardening among the public.

Perhaps it was also absent during the pre-election phase, when the opposition was trying to compete with the political predator with white gloves.

There was competition. There was no struggle.

And so all the announcements about elections of existential, civilizational significance were nonsense. At the conversational level, I set a frame that you didn’t fit.

Today, at this moment, the streets and squares of Yerevan and other cities should have been flooded with people. A wave of widespread defiance should have been raised. I assure you, it wouldn’t hurt your law practice. On the contrary, it would strengthen your own position at the institutional level.

But you prefer not to take off your white gloves.

Regardless of the results of the recalculation, regardless of possible rearrangements, nothing will change in the relative sense. Because you will continue to practice law, and the political predator will continue to practice his direct business, politics.”

—

“Many questions were expected to be answered from the main five-year election campaign in Armenia. Will Nikol Pashinyan retain power or will he give in under the pressure of several opposition wings, who are united in their desire to break the monopoly of the “Civil Contract”? Will Yerevan follow the path of European integration or will it follow the usual Eurasian path? Will the “historic elections” bring peace with Azerbaijan and the settlement of relations with Turkey closer?

However, after the elections, we only got a new dose of questions. As it turned out, approaching the political horizon line only made it even more uncertain and unattainable,” writes Russian analyst Sergey Markedonov in the article titled “Beyond the Horizon” in the Kommersant Russian periodical.

According to him, at first glance, the success of the ruling party and Nikol Pashinyan himself does not raise doubts.

“Even if we put aside for a moment the use of administrative resources unprecedented for post-Soviet Armenia and pressures on the opposition, we must admit that regardless of the personal attitude towards the image of the Armenian Prime Minister, he has a certain amount of support and popularity, especially in villages and small towns.

“Civil Agreement”, like five years ago, will be able to form a government on its own, without forming a coalition with anyone. However, compared to 2021, the ruling party will get ten seats less, which means that the cherished constitutional majority will not be secured.

Therefore, problems will arise when making changes to the Mother Law, although Armenia is potentially faced with the prospect of holding two referendums (on amending the Constitution and choosing the integration vector). Complications for the government? Not only. The government gets a field to maneuver both within the country and in the dialogue and negotiations with Moscow, Ankara and Baku,” Markedonov makes such a comment.

He also believes that everything is not clear even in the opposition field. According to the Russian analyst, during all eight years of being in power, Pashinyan built his own legitimacy by opposing those whom he called “formers”.

But, according to the analyst, Samvel Karapetyan, the leader of the “Strong Armenia” bloc, actually fulfilled the public demand of the “third force” by implementing the “restart” of the Armenian opposition and becoming its main pillar, instead of the Kocharian “Armenia” bloc.

“It is not necessary that the “third force” will retain its influence in Armenian politics in the future, but a serious bid for that role has already been submitted,” Markedonov notes. In his opinion, the parliamentary elections not only did not eliminate, but on the contrary, they further emphasized the fundamental problems of the Armenian national-state concept, the idea of ​​”Unification” no longer works, and the concept of “Real Armenia”, which is based on the rejection of heroism and sacrifice and consumerism, does not unite the country, but polarizes it more. “The Armenian society and the political class remain divided. their various parts do not seek compromises. Their conception of the country’s future and its place in the world is extremely different. The elections are over, but the struggle for “our own Armenia” continues, and everyone has their own Armenia,” Markedonov writes.

—

After the change of power in 2018, on May 12, when Nikol Pashinyan told the staff of the Ministry of Defense and the senior officers of the Armed Forces represented at that time, the newly appointed Minister of Defense Davit Tonoyani, in particular, announced.

“The next problem that we intend to solve in the near future, and we considered that the candidacy of Davit Tonoyan is the most suitable for this, refers to the depoliticization of the army. I have already had the opportunity to express my special thanks to the representatives of our army and armed forces in the Republic of Artsakh during the last internal political crisis, the Armed Forces managed not to become part of the political process, which is provided for by the Constitution.

This testifies to the high level of institutionalization of our armed forces.

We must continue this process. During political processes, including during elections, the army should not be involved as a party to the electoral process, our task is to ensure the freedom of choice of every citizen of the Republic of Armenia, and in that sense, even more so, every citizen who is an employee of the Armed Forces should be free in his choice, because that is what is provided by the Constitution and laws, and this applies to everyone, from private to general. Nikol Pashinyan noted, adding that The RA Armed Forces should not be pro-government, oppositional and should not consider themselves a political factor.”

Let’s remind that on April 23, 2018, a group of servicemen of the Peacekeeping Brigade of the RA Armed Forces, in uniforms, suddenly joined the protest action of the “My Step” initiative against Serzh Sargsyan’s prime ministership in Yerevan, we are talking about 209 servicemen.

Of course, you can say that at that time the Acting Minister of Defense was Vigen Sargsyan, but at that time the commander of the Peacekeeping Brigade was Vaghinak Sargsyan, who was appointed as the commander of the NSS border guard troops on June 11, 2018.

And after this there were many cases when they were violated by the military political neutrality and wearing a military uniform the requirement which we have addressed in detail, moreover, we have sent written requests to RA Defense Minister Suren Papikyan.

Now let’s return to the context of the elections:

On December 9, 2018, extraordinary NA elections were scheduled.

The next day was famous became that on December 9, the day of the extraordinary elections of the National Assembly, from 08:00 to 20:00, the hotline of the Ministry of Defense received 55 calls, which mainly related to the issues of organization of elections, transfer of servicemen from military units, voting of conscripts on leave. And about 35% of the calls were questions beyond the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense, and citizens were directed to other departments.

How? were informed There were alerts from the Ministry of Defense that servicemen enter the polling station in line, but the on-the-spot studies revealed that such an idea was formed by misunderstanding and it refers to the organization of the process of entering the polling station one by one and in groups.

In addition, the issue of organizing the voting of mandatory conscripts on leave was raised, and it was clarified that there are some legal gaps in this regard, so the proposal was taken into account and will be discussed with the competent structures in order to find systemic solutions.

In other words, at that time, the Ministry of Defense at least addressed and informed the media about some problems, in those days there were no embarrassing pictures on the Internet related to the army, when there was still the Defense Ministry. We cannot say how many of the servicemen voted in the extraordinary elections of December 2018, and to what extent there was guidance, here we are talking about obvious shameful violations.

Let’s remind that as a result of the extraordinary parliamentary elections held on December 9, three forces passed the National Assembly: “My Step” bloc (88 seats), PAP (26 seats) and “Enlightened Armenia” party (18 seats). And how Nikol Pashinyan was հայտարարել՝  “It is the first time that their results will not be challenged in the Constitutional Court.”

Already on June 20, 2021 again during the NA extraordinary elections be recorded was a case when soldiers vote with ready-made envelopes. At that time, the Minister of Defense of the Republic of Armenia was Vagharshak Harutyunyan, he was not a member of the CP, moreover, there were various reports that it was also at that time of the Armed Forces of Armenia Arshak Karapetyan, the first deputy chief of the general staff, “also had a mixed finger”.

By the way, there was also information that the contract workers whose relatives had blocked their way during the 44-day period so that they would not go to Artsakh to participate in combat operations also “worked” for Pashinyan, and it was in Tavush that such cases occurred.

And during the National Assembly elections held on June 7, 2026, such cases related to the army received a more shameful image, including cases of voting after 8:00 p.m., moreover, there were cases when soldiers entered the precinct after 8:00 p.m., and we are talking about several dozen soldiers. “Akanets” observation mission reported that about 480 servicemen were allowed to vote after 20:00.

Of course, as it was expected, the authorities justified it without giving each other a turn, if not to say that they did not see a problem with the law.

First, CEC Chairman Vahagn Hovakimyan, referring to the information spread on the Internet that after the end of the elections, after 20:00, military personnel were brought to the polling stations for the purpose of voting, stated that this was due to the slow organization of work at the polling stations.

“Before 20:00 in the evening, the soldiers were in front of the door of the polling station, waiting for their turn, and here a problem arose: either close the door of the polling station for the military and not let them in, so that they could exercise their right to vote, or let them in,” he elaborated, stressing that those soldiers had been waiting in front of the polling stations for a long time and could not simply enter due to the queues at the polling station, and that such a problem was in only 2 polling stations.

Then the head of the General Staff of the RA Armed Forces spoke to journalists insist that the soldiers voted within the law. In other words, according to the requirements of the Electoral Code, “it doesn’t matter if he is a soldier or an ordinary citizen, he is in the territory of the electoral district, he is allowed to continue his constitutional duty.”

“Our servicemen were in the territory of the polling station at the appointed time, that is, no serviceman came to the polling station late,” Asryan emphasized.

In response to the objection that there is a precinct that the soldiers entered after 8:00 p.m., the head of the General Election Commission urged that the remaining questions should be addressed to the Central Election Commission and other related bodies.

It is clear, isn’t it, that the interest of the soldiers to fulfill this civic duty was not in favor of the opposition forces, and it was very painful to see the scenes and footage of the disrespectful attitude towards the army and the soldier, the confused soldiers. The supporters of the current government will say that during the previous government there were cases of targeting soldiers, we do not rule it out, nor do we justify it. We simply record that we have “improvement” of such cases in a negative sense, and this is during the rule of the force whose leader promised in 2018: “during political processes, including elections, the army should not be involved as a party to the electoral process.”

The current political and military leadership may still claim that they have not broken their revolutionary promise, but the facts speak of the opposite, and they know it well. And the army, really, should be kept away from political preferences and games, even under the previous authorities, I always said that the Ministry of Defense should not be partisan, maybe my position is subjective, especially when there can be a non-partisan head of the General Staff, who will quote or refer to Nikol Pashinyan more than the party Minister of Defense.

In this context, we cannot ignore the information circulated that immediately after the war of 2020, the head of the General Staff of the RA Armed Forces, Onik Gasparyan, was faced with the problem of involving the army in political processes, but he did not give in to it in favor of the government. At the same time, we must remind that 2020 on October 27 after that, when same day Vazgen Manukyan had demanded The resignation of Nikol Pashinyan’s government, saying that all power should be handed over to the army, the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Armenia and the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Armenia with a joint statement came forward, stressing that they will unconditionally fulfill the orders and decisions of the Supreme Commander of the Republic of Armenia.

“Especially in the conditions of martial law The Armed Forces of Armenia adhere to the hierarchy provided by law and will continue to unconditionally fulfill the orders and decisions of the Supreme Commander of the RA, the Government and the Minister of Defense.

RA Ministry of Defense and the General Staff of the Armed Forces political and semi-political circles are called upon to refrain from divisive statements and actions“, stated in the statement of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Defense.

Of course, we have reservations as to whether the General Assembly should have made such a statement, whether making such a statement during the war did not interfere with the political processes in some sense.

And already on February 25, 2021, when the RA armed forces demanded the resignation of Nikol Pashinyan and the government, Onik Gasparyan was accused by Nikol Pashinyan of meddling in political processes and attempting a military coup, although here it was about the security problems facing the homeland. Of course, it might have been right for Onik Gasparyan to write an application for release and leave, making the same statement on his own behalf, especially when he claimed that the statement of the General Staff was not dictated by anyone, and that it was only necessary to warn about future security challenges, and that the cup of patience of the Armed Forces was full, even though the signatories of the statement until today they are in the armed forces and even received official promotion.

—

Once upon a time undivided considered Baku and: Ankara more and more are disagreement of Armenia and: Israel with their external political connections around: For decades, the slogan “one nation, two states” has characterized Turkish-Azerbaijani relations, closely related to ethnic brotherhood, energy interdependence and military alliance.

Most recently, all this was “raised on the shield, during the Nagorno-Karabakh war in 2020, and Turkey provided unwavering support to the official Baku not only in words, but also in deeds. And? now Pan-Turkist of rhetoric following appears are of Armenia with of relations regulation, «israeli» and: «iranian» the questions:

What is it about? in Ankara Azerbaijan the ambassador recently to announce was, that turkish–Armenian the border will open In Armenia June from elections after, h:personal in the law changes to perform about referendum with results, which completely flatten is Mountainous Karabakh about any mention: June 7-in: in the elections prime minister Nicole: Pashinyan and: «Civil: contract» party of success case like the prospect the most than real is seems:

Remarkable is, that foreign the ambassador publicly to announce is Turkey sovereign marginal policy implementation deadlines and conditions: This demand illustrates a trend noted by Gönul Toll of the Washington-based Near East Institute. Over the past year, Turkish diplomats have increasingly complained about how “complicated” the situation in Azerbaijan has become, especially as Baku tries to dictate terms to Ankara.

The ambassador’s public statement brings the situation to a new level.   Former diplomat Fatih Ceylan says: “At a time when official Ankara carefully avoids statements against Baku due to Azerbaijan’s strategic and military ties with Israel, the Azerbaijani ambassador’s comment on the normalization of relations between Turkey and Armenia is at least unsuccessful. More precisely, this is a case of not knowing one’s place,” Ceylan said, adding that he expects “an imminent harsh condemnation from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.”

A sharp condemnation never happened, but the contacts are real. This a reminder is 2009 the date, when Turkey and: Armenia: signed Zurich the records of relations regulation regarding, sbut Azerbaijan political and: diplomatic pressure implemented` forcing Unspeakable back off: Baku mass media–the and: some experts to criticize are In Armenia of Ankara ambassador Serdar To Kilic it thing for, that he to dare is to say, or «himself felt՝ how at home» recently Yerevan done visit time: For power analyst Farhad Mamedov to criticize is to him as if «Baku red the lines to ignore» for:

But 2026 the date 2009 the date not: Today Ankara Baku to yield more little reasons has: «Karabakh the question» closed is, Azerbaijan her territorial goals reached is Turkey with the help of: of Ankara own strategic calculations to change are. of Armenia with of relations discharge able is reduce russian effect South In the Caucasus (օրինակ՝ Er:and:doing can are raise From Gyumri 102-th base withdrawal the question)՝ opening straight to:and:gave way to: Central Asia and: strengthening Rejep Erdogan of the government authority Do?and:at the entrance.

Turkic allies between more and more deep split are cause also Israel attitude and: Near in the east his driven by policy regarding disagreements. Ilham Aliyev once said that Azerbaijani-Israeli relations are like an iceberg, 9/10 of which is hidden under water, and that is not just a nice expression. It is no secret that Baku and West Jerusalem, without attracting too much noise, have formed one of the strongest military-intelligence partnerships in the post-Soviet space.

Israeli drone flying the devices and: barrier ammunition crucial role are played 2020 in the year Armenian protection breakthrough in action. Today israeli to the weapon department is falling Azerbaijan modern of armaments of import almost 70 percent: Փոխարենը՝ Baku “sionist mode» supply is raw of oil approx 40 percent, which vital resource is don’t country for, which this or it degree intensity permanent war is thrust almost her neighbors with:

But here Baku for there is don’t important problem. Israel and: his supporters in Washington more and more often are Turkey ներկայացնում՝ as «new Iran»:  Opposition leader Naftali Bennett has warned about the “emerging Turkish threat”. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Turkish President Recep Erdogan of oppressing the Kurds, violating Ankara’s “red lines”.

Years continuously Azerbaijan and: Turkey the presidents with success overcome are that cultural and: political the gap` concentrating general turkish of identity, safety and: economic of interdependence on: But 2020 year Mountainous Karabakh of war success conceit is to give birth In Baku. Aliyev anymore himself no տեսնում՝ as younger partner, thatn “senior brother’s» by what?–that sponsorship need has: More and more confident getting involved regional hegemon role inna, as if, obviously expect is appropriate understanding in Ankara: Similar attitude annoying is turkish officials, which ones remembermakes are, or how are provide drone flying devices:, military advisors and: diplomatic cover, which possible made the victory in Karabakh:

Iran against Israel the war email more revealed turkish ambitious allies views the discrepancy։ If: let’s believe CNN to the TV channel՝ «Israel last of war during actions is implemented Iran against` using In Azerbaijan forces deployment»: Israel’s special military and intelligence units (including Special Forces fighters, a search and rescue helicopter unit and Mossad operatives) allegedly operated in several areas along the border with Iran, including just 96 km from Tabriz.

Preparations for the operation began several weeks before the start of the war. The Israelis planted eavesdropping devices and intelligence equipment, setting the stage for further action. While in Azerbaijan, the Netanyahu regime gathered intelligence on Iranian movements and military facilities, including to provide early warning data on Iranian missile launches.

From Azerbaijan Israel by implemented main from actions one of war first per week IRPC exploratory agency boss Rahman Moghadami the murder was. Thus, Tehran suspects Baku of secretly helping Israel, even using the Caspian country’s airspace to strike Iran in June 2025. When Iranian drones landed in Nakhijevan in March 2026, hitting the airport and injuring four civilians, Aliyev called it “terrorism” and vowed revenge. However, the incident was quickly covered up, and Baku even sent humanitarian aid to Iran for Navruz.

According to Altai Geyushov of the Baku Research Institute, this turn of events was, at least in part, the result of Turkey’s non-public pressure on Aliyev to de-escalate. It case, when Azerbaijan strategic benefit is see Iran azerbaijani regions her positions reinforcement in, Turkey for Iran ethnic based on to divide any program unacceptable is, how many that he fear has, that like the adventure will promote also turkish of unity for strictly dangerous Kurdish separatism:

Her in turn, Israel Azerbaijan to maneuver diplomatic area is providing, that seems` valuable connections of Washington with: This especially valuable is, how many that Baku aspiration is finally eliminate 1992 year of freedom of support about of the law 907-th correction, which prohibition is Azerbaijan directly american military support get:

Probably so much email a lot grounds there are none to assume, that Turkey and: Azerbaijan between of trust the dialog visible in perspective will resume: Baku and: of Ankara between the contradictions multiplying are and: early or late of water face out will come to the crowd and «to the friendly ones» to entertain for:

Yuri Mavashev

vpoanalytics.com

Translation by Zhanna Avetisyan

—

In the “Pressing” program Satik Seyranyan the guest is political scientist, constitutionalist Vardan Poghosyan is.

The main theses of the interview are below.

• These elections were accompanied by shameful violations and frauds, were held in an atmosphere of unprecedented repression, abuse of administrative resources, hatred and threats by the ruling power, and if we had a normal Constitutional Court, it would have found that the elections were held in an unconstitutional manner and would have annulled the elections. At that time, we could also say in a legal sense that there was a usurpation of power by the CP, with corresponding criminal legal consequences. And in the political sense, yes, what happened is usurpation of power by the CP.

• If they do not take the mandates, from a legal point of view, our “Electoral Code” considers the boycott acceptable, and the respective mandates remain vacant. Let’s imagine that a party completely renounces the mandates of the National Assembly. If all 3 opposition forces that passed the National Assembly give up their mandates, and the parliamentary candidates on their list also express a notarized challenge, then the National Assembly will consist only of the ruling “Civil Contract” (CP) party, which will have 60 mandates. It is a legally debatable issue whether that Parliament has the right to act. If the opposition refuses of the mandates, the KP will go for the amendment of the Electoral Code, they will achieve that the forces that participated in the elections and are the forces supporting the KP will hold a National Assembly. I’m sure that in such a scenario, Arman Tatoyan, who got the next most votes, will not go for a deal, but KP proxies will gladly go for that deal. Only from that point of view, the call to give up mandates to the opposition is very controversial. Even if the CP does not go for it, it does not have a management problem. If the government pours its proxy forces into the Parliament, then the amendment of the new Constitution will not cause a problem for Pashinyan. In my prediction: The boycott of the opposition to give up mandates will lead to the fact that the National Assembly will be completely filled with governmental and pro-governmental forces.:

• If the opposition forces do not give up their mandates and agree to enter the Parliament, then two important problems can be solved. If the PAP succeeds in entering the Parliament, it turns out that the CP will have 60 mandates, the opposition parties – 45. In that case, Pashinyan does not have the necessary 3/5 or 2/3 power ratio, he will not be able to change constitutional laws. All this commotion and persecution related to PAP is done to take 5 mandates and have 3/5. Having a 3/5 is really important. There are many senior positions that cannot be appointed by the CP without that number of votes.

• Throughout the pre-election campaign, the CP talked about the fact that they would have a constitutional majority, and on the night of the vote, their faces showed that they were far from having that number. 

To remind, during the entire campaign, Nikol Pashinyan considered it very realistic to have a Constitutional majority as a result of the elections.

• The National Assembly has the right to put the draft of the new Constitution to a referendum if 2/3 of the total number of deputies approve the draft. If the opposition puts the mandates, the government after filling the Parliament with its proxy forces can have a 5/5 majority to change the Constitution. That’s why I think that mandates should be taken:

• Let’s suppose that the opposition forces refused and put down the mandates, generated a street fight… then?.. How will that fight end if it does not have legal consequences in the Parliament? Article 115 of the Constitution says that the Prime Minister can be changed after one year with the votes of a simple majority of the members of the National Assembly. If the struggle in the street boils over, it is possible to change the Prime Minister by solving the issue of votes of 7-8 MPs, but if the mandates are dropped, it will not be possible to do that.

• Territorial demands, a demand to change the Constitution, a demand to make the territory of Armenia a Corridor, and without having opposition parties in the Parliament, it will not be possible to prevent them.

• All 3 opposition forces entering the Parliament must make a joint statement that they will not cooperate with the ruling power under any circumstances, and their only goal in going to the National Assembly is the change of power. This is, of course, a moral obligation. 

• Regardless of everything, the Parliament will consist of 105 deputies. 50% 1 of 105 is 53. With the votes of that number of deputies, it is possible to carry out a process of expressing no confidence in the Prime Minister. If “Prosperous Armenia” enters the Parliament, then 8 mandates from the CP will be needed in order to change the balance of power in the Parliament.

• The dictatorial regime of KP will do everything to remove the political forces fighting against this regime and even ordinary citizens and public-politicians from the game. But after these announced results, we have nothing to lose as a nation and a state. we have to fight.

• The opposition forces that did not pass the parliament received respectable votes. They have a mission to work with voters. During the last debate of the public television company, the opposition forces showed how deeply they professionally know the issues and should cooperate with each other. The united external pressures of the opposition forces represented in the National Assembly and the opposition forces that did not enter the parliament, including those that did not participate in the elections, should be combined, and in this regard, the emotional appeals to the opposition forces that they should not take the mandates are really incomprehensible to me. From the point of view of political struggle, it is unacceptable to give up the most powerful lever: I understand everyone’s emotions, but we should not be guided by emotions…

• According to the law of the Republic of Armenia, no enclave exists in Armenia, and if any official calls that the issue of enclaves should be resolved, it is a criminal offense because it is an encroachment on the territory of Armenia.

Details in the video.

—