Rita Vorperian, Veteran ARS Leader and Academician, Passes Away

Rita Vorperian

Dr. Rita Vorperian, a veteran leader of the Armenian Relief Society Western U.S., an academician and prolific writer, passed away on Tuesday in Los Angeles. She was 88.

For more than two decades, Vorperian served as the Executive Director of the ARS Western U.S., administrating the organization’s vital activities, as it expanded not only its social services in the community, but also its relief efforts in Armenia and elsewhere in the Diaspora.

Born in Aleppo, Syria, Vorperian graduated from the local Karen Yeppe Armenian High School. She continued her studies at the St. Joseph University in Beirut, earning a degree in Armenian Studies. After moving to the United States, Vorperian enrolled in UCLA, from where she earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Near Eastern Studies, a Master’s degree in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, and a Ph.D. Armenian literature and literary criticism.

Vorperian was a teaching fellow and lecturer in Western Armenian at UCLA.

She was a contributor to Asbarez, where her articles on language, culture and politics were featured not only in the publication’s Year End and April 24 special issues, but were a regular part of the newspaper’s varied commentary and op-ed pages.

At the request of Asbarez, Vorperian was awarded the Mestrob Mashdots Medal by His Holiness Aram I, Catholicos of the Great House of Cilicia. That award was presented at a special event by then Western Prelate Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian.

Vorperian was also one of the founding members of the Hamazkayin Armenian Cultural and Educational Association of Western U.S.

On behalf of the management, editorial board and staff of Asbarez, we offer our condolences to Vorperian’s son, Harry, himself a collaborator and contributor to the publication, her relatives, friends and colleagues.

Asbarez will feature tributes to Vorperian in its upcoming editions.

—

Houri Berberian and Talinn Grigor Reappointed as Co-Editors of the ‘Journal of

Houri Berberian (l) and Talinn Grigor

“Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies” Editors-in-Chief Houri Berberian (Chancellor’s Professor of History and Meghrouni Family Presidential Chair in Armenian Studies at UC Irvine) and Talinn Grigor (Professor of Art and Architectural History at UC Davis), along with Book Review Editor Tsolin Nalbantian (Associate Professor of Modern Middle East History at Leiden University), have been reappointed by the Society for Armenian Studies for an additional two-year term, 2027 to 2028, to continue their collaborative efforts with ongoing excellence, dedication, and rigor.

“The JSAS was founded in 1984 and is the premier academic journal in the field of Armenian Studies,” said SAS President Barlow Der Mugrdechian. “Under the leadership of co-editors Berberian and Grigor, the JSAS will continue to flourish.”

The “Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies” will publish its second special issue commemorating SAS’s 50th anniversary (Vol. 31, 2026) in November, in collaboration with the University of Nebraska Press. UNP has served as the publisher for several prominent scholarly journals for over twenty years, covering disciplines such as Native American studies, women’s studies, literature, regional studies, and additional fields.

JSAS publishes peer-reviewed scholarship from all disciplinary and comparative perspectives relating to Armenians and the field of Armenian Studies. Committed to making the field relevant to a broad interdisciplinary audience, it aims to foster new directions in the field, encouraging global, cross-cultural, and multidisciplinary submissions that align with cutting-edge scholarly research across periods and research areas.

JSAS, accessible electronically via Project MUSE, will continue publishing research articles, book reviews, and review essays. Each issue will feature a cover design derived from one of its articles. Beginning in 2027, JSAS will additionally include forums dedicated to critical discussions on selected topics within Armenian Studies. 

The Society for Armenian Studies is an international body that brings together scholars and students to conduct research, teach, and share the richness of Armenian history, language, literature, and culture. It is dedicated to the development of Armenian Studies as an academic discipline. Visit the website for more information on SAS.

—

Armenia’s Constitutional Court Was Unable to Elect a President

Armenia’s Constitutional Court

Armenia’s Constitutional Court was unable to elect a new president—chief justice–during its session on Wednesday on neither the first nor the second round of voting.

According to the Constitutional Court said that former Civil Contract lawmaker Vladimir Vartanyan and current court vice-president, Edgar Shatiryan, who is currently the acting president, were nominated, Azatutyun.am reported.

A candidate from among the members of the Constitutional Court can be elected President if they receive the votes of six Constitutional Court judges; if only one candidate is nominated, they are elected with five votes.

During the session, which lasted approximately five hours, no candidate received either six or five votes. The Constitutional Court has not specified how many votes each candidate received in the secret ballot.

According to the rules of procedure, if a President of the Constitutional Court is not elected, new elections are to be held within 10 days or no later than 30 days after the vote in the second round of the election.

The six-year term of the previous Constitutional Court President, Arman Dilanyan, expired on October 12. He will continue to serve as a judge for another four years but can no longer seek the position of Constitutional Court President.

Dilanyan was at a center of controversy following the June 7 parliamentary elections, when he was accused of siding with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and opting to not entertain challenges to election results put forth by opposition groups. The court finally ruled to uphold the results as announced by the Central Electoral Commission. Based on those results, the Prosperous Armenia Party, which had secured 3.99 percent of the votes, was barred from entering parliament, granting Pashinyan a majority.

—

The Sound that Remains: Remembering Hachig Kazarian

Hachig Kazarian. Photo by: Ara Topouzian

BY ARA TOPOUZIAN
From The Armenian Weekly

As a dance would start, I would hear the wailing sound of the solo clarinet, unmistakably signifying the beginning of a “Haleh” (a traditional Western Armenian circle folk dance) and that we should gather with our friends to begin the dance.

The tempo of the song would begin slowly, arms would clench — the bonding of only close brothers and friends. A circle of men would build and embrace the dance floor — a wall of dancers — as you could see the feet slowly shuffle. As the music progressed, his clarinet playing grew more intense.

This was the sound of Hachig Kazarian.

On Sept. 26, his clarinet went silent as we lost a true legend within the Armenian music world. He was 85 years old.

Hachig was an icon, a titan and an innovator. His sound influenced generations of Armenian clarinetists, many of whom tried to imitate or emulate what he did. But the unmistakable tone, phrasing and style of Hachig’s playing belonged to him. It was his voice.

is playing influenced my desire to play music. Watching him on stage, taking command and leadership while performing, captivated my attention each and every time. Those of us who might have been called “band groupies” always stood near the stage in order to watch his magic unfold for the evening. 

That stage presence was a result of a lifetime devoted to music.

Born and raised in Detroit, Hachig began playing clarinet as a boy and was introduced to Armenian music at a young age by Haig “Zurnaji Haig” Krikorian, an old-country Armenian musician and family friend who taught him to play village songs and dances by ear.

Hachig went on to study at the Juilliard School in New York from 1960 to 1966, earning bachelor’s and master’s degrees in clarinet performance. While in New York, he became immersed in a remarkable period of Armenian American and Middle Eastern music, performing alongside musicians such as John Berberian, Charles “Chick” Ganimian and other artists that would become some of the most important names of that generation.

Over the decades, Hachig performed and recorded extensively, including as a member of the legendary “Kef Time” ensemble alongside one of his best friends and musical colleague, oudist Richard Hagopian. His professional life also included another important role: educator. He spent decades teaching instrumental music in the public school system while continuing to perform, record and preserve Armenian music.

In 2015, I produced a documentary (“Guardians of Armenian Music”) paying tribute to the Armenian musicians in Detroit who helped preserve traditional music and bring it to our community. Hachig was an integral part of that documentary. In many ways, his experiences, knowledge and perspective helped shape the tone and structure for the entire documentary.

As a young man who traveled for “kef” (party), I attended and participated in many events where he played. Almost every time I audio recorded those live appearances. I did not simply run to the stage, put down a cassette recorder and walk away. I always asked him for permission because I felt he deserved that type of respect. And if he had said no, I would have honored it.

Not only did he influence my love of music, he taught me to tune my very first kanun over 35 years ago. 

But what I learned from Hachig went well beyond the instrument and songs.

Before I became a musician, I had the opportunity several times to work with him in an event-organizing capacity. Usually this meant hiring Hachig for an Armenian Youth Federation dance and letting him choose the other artists with whom he wanted to perform. I learned from him the importance of creating ensembles that would sound musically pleasing.

Directly and indirectly, I also learned from him the business of being a musician — how to create a contract, how to book a performance, how to present myself on stage and so much more.

What was different about Hachig was that he was not just a musical titan to us musicians. He was also a father and uncle figure to a bunch of us boys who grew up with his children.

That made the relationship different. There was the musician we admired from the dance floor and watched from in front of the stage, but there was also the man we knew away from the stage.

As I got older, that relationship evolved. The admiration I had for his musicianship never went away, but our conversations increasingly went beyond music — to family, life, being a good husband and being a good father.

And yet, music was never very far away.

In recent years, Hachig slowed down his public performances, but he never stopped performing or practicing music. Some of my greatest recent memories were playing music with him at family parties, graduations and other special gatherings.

Through it all, he never stopped teaching, either.

In fact, he offered to show me alternative approaches to learning and memorizing the makams (a system of modal scales). In 2024, he asked me to perform with him in a small ensemble so that we could play Armenian village dances from his ancestral homeland of Van. We performed the songs for the Houshamadyan organization for the purpose of archiving these Armenian dances.

Not only was it an honor to be asked to play with him, but we performed those songs on the very same stage where Hachig had performed as a boy, at one of the original Armenian community centers in the City of Detroit.

There was something particularly meaningful about that experience because decades later, Hachig was still doing what he had done throughout his life — passing the music from one generation to another.

But for Hachig, passing along the music was about more than teaching someone how to play it. It was about making sure it would never be forgotten. Preserving this music was incredibly important to him.

His catalog of Armenian village dances was part of that work. He understood that this music was more than entertainment. It carried history. It carried culture. It carried the memory of people and places that were no longer here.

In 2024, he published his book “Western Armenian Music: From Asia Minor to the United States,” which became the capstone of his career. While his book took several years to envision and write, it has now become an essential document and teaching resource for anyone interested in understanding Western Armenian music and what it took to preserve it in the United States. 

Hachig was a Juilliard graduate, an extraordinary accomplishment and one that certainly added to his musical credentials. Yet when it came to Armenian music, he would often tell you that you did not need to be a Juilliard graduate to play it.

The music needed to be in your heart and soul.

But if you were going to play it, you needed to play it well.

Playing the music well went beyond simply playing notes. It meant understanding the lyrical origins of each song. One of my own regrets as a musician is that I don’t speak the Armenian language. Hachig felt (and rightly so) that was truly unfortunate for anyone playing our music, since much of it is connected to lyrics. He would ask: How could you really feel the song if you don’t know what the song is about?

That was Hachig. There was always something deeper behind the music.

His generation had the opportunity to experience many of the musicians we now consider masters of Armenian, Greek and Middle Eastern music. I always marveled at the stories he would tell about musicians he had seen perform and those he had the opportunity to perform alongside such as oudists Hrant Kenkulian and Agapios Tomboulis.

Through those stories, he gave us a glimpse into a generation of music that, as he would often remind us, “we missed out on seeing.”

He was right.

We did miss out on that generation.

But what Hachig may not have said was that our generation had its masters, too.

He was one of them.

Over the past few weeks, many people have approached me personally to offer their condolences on Hachig’s passing. At first, I found it a little strange. Why were people offering me condolences?

Then someone said something that put it all into perspective: “You’re all part of a musical brotherhood.”

And I realized they were right. Somehow, that understanding made the loss feel even heavier.

For so many of us, Hachig wasn’t simply a musician we admired. He was our mentor and our inspiration. He helped shape how we understood this music and, for many of us, how we became musicians ourselves.

So his loss feels personal to all of us.

I have many memories of Hachig and feel fortunate to have known him — not simply as the musician I watched from the side of the stage when I was young, but eventually as someone I could perform alongside, learn from, laugh with and call Baron (a term of respect).

My generation and the generations that follow now have a monumental task. We have an obligation not to allow this music to disappear. To do so would mean losing a piece of Armenian culture and history.

Hachig spent much of his life making sure that wouldn’t happen.

And perhaps that is the greatest tribute we can give him: to keep playing it, teaching it, documenting it and passing it along.

The clarinet may have gone silent.

But the sound of Hachig Kazarian has not.

Below is Kazarian’s Selected Discography:

  • “Harem Dance / Pretty Girl” — Armenian Jazz Sextet (Kapp Records, 45 rpm; uncredited performance), 1957
  • “Armenian Echoes” — Hye Tones, c. 1960
  • “Passport East” — Hye Tones, 1962
  • “Armenia, Armenia: Armenian Songs and Dances” — Hachig Kazarian and His Ensemble (originally released as “The Exciting Sounds of Hachig Kazarian”; Monitor Records/Smithsonian Folkways), 1964-65
  • “Music of the Middle East” — John Berberian (Roulette Records), 1966
  • “Impressions of the Middle East” — Herbie Mann (Atlantic Records), 1967
  • “The Wailing Dervishes” — Herbie Mann (Atlantic Records), 1967-68
  • “Kef Time Las Vegas” (Saha Records), 1968
  • “Kef Time Fresno” (Saha Records), 1969
  • “Kef Time Detroit” (Saha Records), 1971
  • “Kef Time Hartford” (Saha Records), 1975
  • “Tom Bozigian Presents Songs and Dances of the Armenian People,” 1979
  • “Harry Minassian” (CK125), c. 1980
  • “Changing Directions: Music for Intermediate Folk Dance” (Vols.1-5), 1985 (High/Scope Press)
  • “More Exciting Sounds of Hachig Kazarian” (Kross), 1993
  • “Mediterranean Montage” — The Levendes (American Recording Productions), 1997

Author’s note: The discography is not exhaustive. Throughout his career, Hachig Kazarian contributed his talents to numerous recordings as a guest artist, sometimes appearing on only one or two tracks. Additional recordings and collaborations may not be represented in this list.

Ara Topouzian is an Armenian-American musician whose proficiency at the Kanun (Middle Eastern harp) has made him a nationally-recognized artist.




—

Ari Balouzian Nominated for Critics Choice Documentary Award

The documentary “You Can See Everything” received five Critics Choice Documentary Awards nominations on Wednesday, including Best Documentary Feature and Best Director for Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, as well as Best Original Score by Ari Balouzian.

“You Can See Everything” follows notorious Silicon Valley founder Elizabeth Holmes, who invites a skeptical film crew to document her life just 34 days before she is sent to prison. A24 is campaigning the film across several awards categories, including Best Original Score for Balouzian.

Balouzian is also the composer of Lance Oppenheim’s “Primtetime,” starring Robert Pattinson, which is currently in theaters.

The composer, who is a classically trained Armenian-American musician, is also a member of the soul group “Gabriels.” His previous film work includes “Some Kind of Heaven,” “Spermworld” and “Ren Faire”. He was previously nominated for a Critics Choice Documentary Award for his work on “Feels Good Man” in 2020.

“You Can See Everything” opens in theaters on October 16.

The winners of the Critics Choice Documentary Awards will be announced on Sunday, November 8, at the Edison Ballroom in New York City.

—

Asbarez: Placido Domingo to Perform in Yerevan

World renowned tenor Placido Domingo will be among guests at a gala concert celebrating the 75th birthday anniversary of the late opera singer Gegham Grigoryan.

The event be held at the Alexander Spendiaryan National Academic Theater of Opera and Ballet in Yerevan, the Culture Ministry announced. 

Gegham Grigoryan’s daughter Hasmik Grigoryan, among the most famous contemporary opera singers, will perform with Domingo.

The musical director and conductor of the evening will be Gegham Grigoryan’s eldest son, Vardan Grigoryan. A press conference was held on Wednesday October 14 at the Opera House, during which Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports of Armenia Zhanna Andreasyan emphasized the importance of celebrating the anniversaries of great artists. 

Placido Domingo noted his fond memories of Gegham Grigoryan, such as Grigoryan’s performances at the Metropolitan Opera, La Scala, and elsewhere. He remarked on Grigoryan’s superb voice.

Gegham Grigoryan’s daughter, Hasmik Grigoryan, welcomed the audience and thanked the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports of Armenia and the Opera House for the organizing the event. Gegham Grigoryan’s son, the concert’s musical director and conductor Vardan Grigoryan, also expressed sincere gratitude in his remarks. 

Karen Durgaryan, Director of the National Academic Theater of Opera and Ballet, presented commemorative medals to Placido Domingo and Hasmik Grigoryan in honor of their exceptional presence on the 75th birth anniversary of Gegham Grigoryan. 

Durgaryan noted the necessity of creating an international competition or festival in Gegham Grigoryan’s name. The gala concert will take place at the National Academic Theater of Opera and Ballet on Friday October 16, at 7pm. 

The show will join Gegham Grigoryan’s family, students, and prominent international opera artists, in celebration of Grigoryan’s creative legacy and memory.

—

168: The points of the Treaty of Alexandropol, which is the basis of the actual vilayetization of Armenia

October 14, 2026

Eduard Sharmazanov, former Speaker of the National Assembly, member of the General Assembly of the RPA, writes: “I present to your court the points of the Alexandropol Treaty, which was the confirmation of the actual vilayetization of Armenia.

On the night of December 2-3, 1920, the disastrous Armenian-Turkish Alexandropol Treaty was signed.
It was signed by Turkish army commander Kyazim Karabekir on the Turkish side, and Alexander Khatisyan on the Armenian side. It consists of 18 articles. The Treaty of Alexandropol was made up of two copies, one in French and one in Turkish.

According to the agreement, Kars marz and Surmalu province were transferred to Turkey, and Nakhichevan, Sharur, Shahtakhti regions were declared temporarily under Turkish patronage, whose future fate was to be decided through a referendum. Armenia was deprived of the right to maintain an army on the basis of defeat, the size of the Armenian army was fixed at 1500 soldiers, 8 cannons and 20 machine guns.

What was that contract?

According to Article 1, the war between Turkey and Armenia was declared over.

Article 2 determined the borders between the Republic of Armenia and Turkey. Kars region and Surmalu province (more than 20.7 km²) passed to Turkey, and Nakhichevan, Sharur and Shahtakhti regions were declared temporarily under the patronage of Turkey, where a special administration would later be established through a referendum.

The Armenian government was deprived of interfering in the activities of that department, regardless of what form that department would take.

The Republic of Armenia had the right to request a referendum in Kars Marz and Surmalu Province, which was passed to Turkey, but in the same article 3 it was also stated that these territories “have an indisputable historical, ethnic and legal connection with Turkey”, which actually ruled out the need for a referendum in advance.

Article 4 Armenia was also deprived of the right to enter general disarmament and maintain an army, it could have only 1500 soldiers, 8 cannons and 20 machine guns. He could build fortifications and place the necessary heavy artillery in them, provided that there were no 15 cm caliber and long-range cannons.
According to Article 5, the political representative or envoy of Turkey, who was supposed to arrive in Yerevan after the conclusion of peace, was given the right to conduct an inspection and investigation at his discretion in connection with the fulfillment of the above-mentioned conditions. Instead, Turkey undertook to provide armed assistance to Armenia, both in case of external and internal danger, if the Armenian government addressed it with such a request. The Yerevan government renounced the Treaty of Sèvres (1920), undertook to recall its delegates from Europe and the USA “to remove from the state administration all those persons who incite and pursue imperialist problems…”. Also, he recognized as invalid all those agreements that were signed to the detriment of Turkey or affected its interests.

Turkey got the right to control the railways and communication roads of Armenia, to take military measures in the territory of Armenia.

Regions recognized as part of Armenia by the treaty, but occupied by Turkey (Alexandrapoli province) were to be released after Armenia fulfilled all the points of the treaty.

This clause gave Turkey the opportunity to continue the long-term occupation of the province, because the treaty was drawn up in such a way that one could always cling to the incomplete or incorrect fulfillment of one or another of its conditions.

Other articles of the agreement were related to free transit trade, the return of refugees to their places of residence, and the rights of the Islamic population of Armenia. All these conditions violated the rights of Armenia and prohibited the return of Armenian emigrants to their homeland.

According to Article 7, “The Turkish government waives compensation for the expenses related to the present war… the two contracting parties also waive all claims for compensation for the losses suffered during the world war.”

With that, Turkey was freed from compensation for the property of both exterminated and deported Armenians.

According to the Paris Peace Assembly, that amount was around 19 billion francs.

—

Sustainable economic development is not possible by taking on foreign debt all the time

October 14, 2026

It is not possible to ensure sustainable economic development by constantly taking external debt. Gagik Tsarukyan wrote about this, referring to the RA economy.

“Although the last major Russian-American economic deal is not directly related to Armenia, it is a good opportunity and obligation for us to draw conclusions.

First of all, one should never appear in the center of the conflict of interests of major powers. For small states, it always ends in losses, and sometimes in tragedy. This is what my team and I have been warning about for the past few years.

The presidents of the USA and Russia protect the economic interests of their states, therefore, the interests of their peoples, the well-being of their citizens.

The economy is not pro-Western or pro-Russian. I have said this many times in the last year, when I saw that problems are artificially created for our economy.

Today, our agriculture, exporters are facing a serious problem. many will not endure, they will simply go bankrupt. And that’s because of a problem that shouldn’t have happened. Instead of pleasant and unrealistic promises, we faced a serious problem that concerns the well-being of hundreds of thousands of our citizens. Why, what made us get into that artificial problem?

I know very well how difficult it is to find markets and stay in those markets. It requires years of hard and persistent work. But the market can be lost because of one mistake, in one day.

It is another fallacy when they say that as soon as the problem with Russia is solved, we will immediately resume the export of our products, agricultural products. I assure you. when that day comes, many will find that their place has already been taken by others, with the products of other states. I also know, you also know, which country in particular. Economic life never stops, and others always take advantage of other people’s mistakes. The longer this situation lasts, the greater the volume of losses we will record.

Economies develop due to sound economic policies. It is not possible to ensure sustainable economic development by constantly borrowing foreign debt.

The economy develops by building, creating, investing. The economy does not develop by trying to take it away, closing the working institutions, bankrupting them, leaving thousands of families without work and without a means of livelihood. By the way, it’s not just about the enterprises owned by me, at all. When the wrong rules of the game enter the economy, it can affect everyone.

Our small Armenia has good opportunities for economic development thanks to its working, creative people. We have good opportunities for mutually beneficial cooperation with Russia, USA, Europe, China, neighbors and many others. But we can also put ourselves in a difficult situation,” he wrote.

—

There was no question of maintaining the concession. Belozyorov for negotiations with Armenia

October 14, 2026

There was no question of maintaining the concession of “South Caucasus Railway” CJSC. General Director of “Russian Railways” OJSC, Chairman of the Management Board Oleg Belozyorov said this in a conversation with Sputnik Armenia.

According to the press release of “Russian Railways” OJSC, “Russian Railways” is open to a dialogue with the Armenian government and a joint assessment of the effectiveness of the concession contract.

“Russia and Armenia have agreed to create a working group to assess the potential of transit communications using Armenia’s railway network.

“Russian Railways” intends to strictly observe the terms of the concession agreement of the Armenian Railways,” the message says.

—

Azerbaijan does not have any territory in Armenia. Pashinyan once again surpassed today

October 14, 2026

On his Facebook page, Nikol Pashinyan referred to the peace process, detailing what peace should look like after the signing and ratification of the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace agreement.

“Armenia should have an area of ​​29,743 square kilometers. The delimitation and demarcation of the borders based on the Alma Ata declaration should take place according to this logic. The issue of enclaves and exclaves should be resolved by the following formula: there should be no enclaves and exclaves on either side of the border, that is, the two countries, Armenia and Azerbaijan, should exchange territories of corresponding exact sizes. All roads and channels of communication should be open within the framework of the TRIPP project and not only,” today, October 14, on his Facebook live broadcast. said Nikol Pashinyan.

What territories does Azerbaijan have in Armenia that Nikol Pashinyan is going to exchange with Azerbaijan, was this statement largely related to Tigranashen?

international scholar, Menua Soghomonyan, a member of the “HayaVote” national-civic association reacting to Pashinyan’s statement, he first noted that Azerbaijan does not have any territory in the Republic of Armenia, the so-called “enclaves” are not enclaves, they are not territories belonging to Azerbaijan.

Read also

  • “We are aware of the open letter of scientists”. “We will address this topic tomorrow.” The government and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology about the letter from the scientists
  • Give it to the Prosecutor’s Office, the Investigative Committee. Rest assured they will find those multi-million abuses. Economist
  • They say to me, “Aren’t you afraid?” no, I’m not afraid, you robber, where is the money, where are the billions? systemic corruption is Mesrop Manukyan

“We have repeatedly made statements and commented on all this. Even if we take as a basis the period of the collapse of the Soviet Union and if we take as a basis that the Republic of Armenia is in the territories of Soviet Armenia, and Azerbaijan is in the Soviet Azerbaijan, then Soviet Armenia has never transferred any territory, be it Tigranashen, Verin Voskepar, or the territories adjacent to Azatamut village, to Armenia by any act in accordance with the laws of the USSR. There is no legal basis for the so-called “enclave map”. 168.amMenua Soghomonyan mentioned in a conversation with

According to him, if in the past there was a kolkhoz under the administrative management of any Azerbaijani region or regional center, this does not mean belonging to Soviet Azerbaijan. Therefore, with today’s announcement, Nikol Pashinyan once again exceeded his authority, ascribing to himself the exclusive authority of the Armenian people in terms of making some changes related to the territory of Armenia.

Menua Soghomonyan answered the question: if Tigranashen really surrenders tomorrow, what will both the collective opposition and the people have to do?

“It’s very clear: action is one thing, ability is another. What needs to be done is to remove Pashinyan from power, he is illegitimate. As a result of these elections, the number of mandates received by the CP was obtained illegally, therefore, the decisions made by it are not legitimate. He rules the country de facto, not de jure, and he does it by violence, using the power bodies, as well as the support of some external actors, first of all, Azerbaijan and Turkey. In this regard, of course, the opposition, the Armenian people and everyone in general have work to do, the ability is another issue, which is related to both the international situation and the ability to form political leadership.”

As for how realistic and possible all this is at the moment, the international expert answered: unfortunately, there are no grounds for optimism at the moment, but the situation can change and develop dramatically.

“Nothing is excluded, we just need to fix the need for all political forces who do not agree with all of this, who understand that this is a catastrophic situation and that the sovereign territories of Armenia are being donated to Azerbaijan, to remove themselves from all agendas and have a series of consultations, so that they are ready to implement the change of power without shocks in the appropriate situation,” Menua Soghomonyan emphasized.

Let’s remind that Nikol Pashinyan touched on the issue of Tigranashen several times. Still on August 21, during a briefing in the Government, Nikol Pashinyan specifically regarding Tigranashen had said.

“We, Armenia and Azerbaijan, established peace on the basis of the 1991 Almaty Declaration. At the time of the adoption of the Almaty Declaration, there are maps showing the territories of Armenia and Azerbaijan, and it was with those maps that we carried out the demarcation in the Kirants region. The understanding is that we should continue the demarcation process with those maps. Now, according to those maps, Artsvashen is the territory of Armenia, and Kyarki, Barkhudarlu and Askipara are not the territory of Armenia. This is a fact that we have to deal with. What is our perception now? should this issue be resolved or not?

Yes, this issue should be resolved. Is there a way to resolve these issues militarily? no, there is no such option.

Solving issues by military means is a thing of the past and a closed page. 1991 Almaty Declaration. The territory of Armenia is 29,743 square kilometers. In those 29,743 square kilometers, Artsvashen is included, naturally, as our exclave. Azerbaijani enclaves located in our territory are not included, therefore, these areas are outside the calculation of 29,743 square kilometers, but as a result of demarcation processes, the territory of Armenia should be 29,743 square kilometers.

—