Armenian Embassy announces launch of direct flights between Kuwait and Armenia

June 11 2023

By Majd Othman

KUWAIT: Armenian Ambassador Sarmen Baghdasaryan announced at a press conference on Sunday the launch of direct flights between Armenia and Kuwait from June 22, with two weekly flights by Armenian national carrier Fly Arna. He also announced exempting Kuwaiti citizens from visas and e-visas (or visa on arrival) for foreigners residing in Kuwait (depending on their nationality).

The launch of the direct flights coincides with the Eid al-Adha holiday. Baghdasaryan pointed out this is another example of the developing relationship between Armenia and Kuwait, which are built on mutual trust and respect. He added the direct flights will enhance existing relations and enrich them, especially when it comes to economic ties and people-to-people contacts. “Armenia has many advantages to offer to holiday travelers. It is a nearby destination, with a 2-hour flight.

It is a family-friendly destination with activities suitable for all the members of the family, especially children. The capital Yerevan is considered one of the top 20 safest and secure cities in the world,” he said. “Armenia has also turned into a destination for foodies, given the sensational tastes and variety of cuisines and fusions offered. Young people can also enjoy adventure tourism like mountain climbing, diving, surfing and skiing,” Baghdasaryan added.

The ambassador also mentioned the social values and culture are very similar between Arabs and Armenians, saying Armenia is looking forward to welcoming Kuwaitis to the country. He added the number of foreign tourists who visited Armenia between January to April 2023 increased by more than 700,000 compared to the same period in 2019. Baghdasaryan concluded by pointing out that the number of visitors from the UAE to Armenia is around 10,000, with 36 daily flights between GCC countries and Armenia.

https://www.kuwaittimes.com/armenian-embassy-announces-launch-of-direct-flights-between-kuwait-and-armenia/

Karabakh photographs capture the devastation of war

 eureporter 
June 12 2023

After 30 years of occupation by Armenia, most of Karabakh was liberated by Azerbaijan in 2020. Much of the territory was devastated by war and restoration work, notably mine clearance, continues. The French photographer Gregory Herpe travelled to Karabakh after the liberation and an exhibition of his work has been held in the European Parliament in Brussels, writes Political Editor Nick Powell.

Gregory Herpe’s Karabakh photographs have drama in their bleakness, even beauty. Indeed, he told the large gathering drawn to the opening of the exhibition of his photographs in the European Parliament that even when his subject is the devastation of war, “it is important to take beautiful pictures that grab the attention of the audience”.

Azerbaijan’s Ambassador to the European Union, Vaqif Sadiqov, said of the French photographer that “driven by a spirit of global citizenship, he went to heavily mined areas”. The resulting pictures were now being exhibited in the home of European democracy. The Ambassador added that what was depicted was not the best part of Azerbaijan’s life as a nation but “we don’t throw away pages from our history book”.

He recalled how Azeris had once been 20% of the population of Armenia but were ethnically cleansed, as were the Azeris in the occupied territories. Azerbaijan remained a country with over 20 minorities and three religions. But now what he called “a subtle, important negotiation process” was underway to normalise relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

The exhibition’s opening was hosted by the Latvian MEP Andris Ameriks. He said he had visited Karabakh last year and seen with his own eyes the destroyed buildings and the minefields but also “the people rebuilding” after returning home following the liberation. The photographs, he added, will remain after the reconstruction is complete “as an historical reminder for future generations of the consequences of war”.

*Photographs are copyright Gregory Herpe.

https://www.eureporter.co/world/karabakh/2023/06/12/karabakh-photographs-capture-the-devastation-of-war/


By

 Nick Powell



Karabakh Armenians celebrate life occasions as uncertain future looms

June 12 2023

Lilit Shahverdyan Jun 12, 2023

A wedding at Stepanakert's Holy Mother of God Cathedral on June 10 (photo by David Ghahramanyan)

"We changed our wedding plans the day before, after realizing that the blockade would not be lifted anytime soon," says Aspram Abrahamyan, 19. 

"We were among the first to have the courage to celebrate a major occasion during the blockade, and we served as an example for others not to cancel their plans," she adds.

Images from her wedding on December 22, 2022, circulated widely on social media.

It was just 10 days after Azerbaijani government-backed activists set up camp on the road in the Lachin corridor, blocking the sole land route connecting the region to Armenia and the outside world. 

The blockade changed everything in Karabakh. The import of supplies was limited and implemented mainly through Russian peacekeepers deployed in the region after the 2020 war. Gas and electricity supplies were cut by Azerbaijan, and the population of roughly 120,000 Armenians found themselves locked inside their small enclave.

The Abramayans' wedding was planned long before the blockade and with the exuberance of typical Armenian nuptials: numerous guests, richly laid tables, and decorations. But a sense of responsibility amid the emergency, as well as the unexpected shortages, led them to scale back their sumptuous plans. 

"The restaurants could not provide all the necessary dishes we ordered, and many guests from Armenia and abroad couldn't arrive… so we decided to cut the number of guests and gather only with our closest family members. Restaurant staff brought food from their homes so the ceremony could keep up its flow," says Abrahamyan.

Another young couple, Snezhana and Sergey Safaryan, got married recently in Stepanakert, the de facto capital of Nagorno Karabakh. Their celebration was also modest, though they did try to honor tradition and maintain the "taste and smell" of an Armenian wedding, says Sergey, the groom. 

"I couldn't see a valid reason to cancel or postpone the event. If the opponent [Azerbaijan] is trying to terrorize us psychologically, we must respond by creating new families," he tells Eurasianet. 

"No matter how much they blockade our freedom of movement, limit our supplies or deprive us of electricity and gas. It only strengthens our determination to live here," Safaryan adds.

Weddings and engagements are among the social occasions that provide an escape from the dire reality they found themselves in after the blockade. 

The Azerbaijani self-styled activists concluded their protest in late April, but only after the installation of a border checkpoint introduced a different kind of restriction on movement between Armenia and Karabakh. Those traveling back and forth now have to present their passports to Azerbaijani border guards to travel between Armenia and Karabakh. Few have done so thus far, and most of those that have have been accompanied by Russian peacekeepers or the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).  

Dancing in the rain

In May, a video of two teenagers dancing in the rain in Stepanakert on the day of their high school graduation became an emblem of Armenians continuing to live in the region amid fears of imminent ethnic cleansing and talks over their future status.

"I realized that these few moments were enough to describe the unbending will and love of us, the young generation of Artsakh, for our restless Artsakh land," Karen Galstyan, one of the dancers, said in an interview with RFE/RL, using an alternate Armenian name for Karabakh.

The cinematic images of the high schoolers' dance were interpreted differently by the thousands of Armenians viewing and sharing it on social media. For some, it was an indicator of dedication to the land where Armenians have lived for centuries, while others heard the ominous ring of the "final last bell" in Karabakh (Armenians call high school graduation the "last bell").  

At another school, students held banners with photos of fallen soldiers and teachers from their school and wore sashes with the inscription "survivors." 

The fate of the Karabakh Armenians hangs in the balance as Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan recently explicitly stated his readiness to recognize the region within the sovereign borders of Azerbaijan. His announcement was criticized and denounced by Karabakh's high-ranking officials, as well as the Armenian Church,  and Armenian organizations around the world. 

Yerevan conditions its recognition offer on Baku offering security guarantees to the Armenian population of Karabakh but the Azerbaijani leadership has vehemently refused to do so

Locals fear that Armenia's recognition of Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan would give Baku the green light to subject them to "ethnic cleansing." 

However, as politicians continue to discuss their fate in the US, Brussels, and Moscow, Armenians in Karabakh reject "defeatist" attitudes and seek to maintain an ordinary rhythm of life.

"We created all the living conditions for our new family. We are very connected to our families and land, and we never even considered leaving," says Abrahamyan. She is currently expecting her first child and believes that major or minor celebrations should still be part of their routine.

"I welcome all the events people celebrate. We shouldn't let feelings of defeat take root in our society. We do not feel the pressure to accept being part of Azerbaijan. We created our family with the thought that it's our home, and we will continue creating and prospering here," she adds.

If the Yerevan-Baku talks maintain their current pace, a peace deal could be signed by the end of 2023, Armenian Security Council Secretary Armen Grigoryan told RFE/RL on June 5.

The signing of a peace agreement would seem to present Karabakh Armenians with a choice: either accept Azerbaijani rule or leave.

But many Karabakh Armenians regard both of these options as unimaginable: Co-existence because of the continuous violations of Armenian civilians' rights by Azerbaijan during and after the 2020 war and fleeing because Karabakh is the only home they ever knew.

"If I leave my home now, it will be the same as if a mother left her newborn child to cry. Our homeland survives because people are living here. We have to stay here so those [Azerbaijanis] who think that our population will easily give up realize they are wrong," says Sergey Safaryan.

Lilit Shahverdyan is a journalist based in Stepanakert. 

Armenia considers nuclear options

June 12 2023
12 June 2023



Print Email

Among the options for a new NPP in Armenia, the project for a Russian unit of 1,000-1,200 MWe is the best developed, according to Karen Sargsyan, Advisor at the Ministry of Territorial Administration & Infrastructure (MTAI). He was speaking at a panel discussion on the prospects for nuclear energy in Armenia organised by Rosatom and the Ministry. Sargsyan recalled that at the beginning of this year, a pre-feasibility study (preliminary feasibility study) was prepared for Armenia for the construction of a plant with a VVER-1200 reactor. Armenia and Russia signed an interstate agreement to build a 1,000-1,200 MWe plant and in May, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Rosatom Director General Alexey Likhachev held talks in Yerevan on the possible construction of a new NPP.

We are talking about a new modification of this type of station – a generation 3+ design with four levels of protection against emergencies and accidents, he specified. There is very little time to make a decision, he noted, because the construction of the station will take at least 10 years, and a lot of work needs to be done meanwhile to further extend the life of the existing station. The first stage of the extension made it possible to extend the life of the NPP from 2016 to 2026. Another 10-year extension until 2036 is now being considered.

The currently operating Armenian NPP (ANPP) at Metsamor was built in the 1970s with two Soviet-supplied VVER-440-V230 units, but was closed following a devastating earthquake in 1988. However, unit 2 was recommissioned with Russian help in 1995 following severe energy shortages. In March 2014, the Armenian government decided to extend the plant’s service life to 2026. Most of the overhaul (until 2019) was funded by an interstate loan from Russia. Construction of a new nuclear plant has long been part of Armenia’s overall plan, although finance has proved to be an obstacle. Likhachev confirmed Rosatom’s continued support for co-operation and extension of the operating life of the NPP was viewed as a priority.

Before the start of any construction, significant design work will be needed. "I think that a decision may be made in the near future. Moreover, the pre-feasibility study is already ready from the Russian side, I have not seen anything from other parties yet," Sargsyan said. However, other projects are being considered in parallel. A working group has been set up under the Ministry, which is discussing the advantages and disadvantages of French, South Korean, American and other possible technologies, he specified.

ANPP Director Movses Vardanyan said Armenia should begin considering the construction of a new power plant today. “In this regard Armenia is a specific country and has several demands,” he said. “First of all, the issues related to safety and seismic resistance are important to us, we also consider financial and logistic issues and many other aspects. As you know, in February 2023 our partners at the Rosatom Energy Projects submitted the preliminary technical-economic substantiation of building two 1200 MW reactors in Armenia. They take into consideration all our demands and issues, and we already have that project on hand. We are also working with our South Korean partners who have offered 1,000 and 1,400 MWe reactors, as well as small modular reactors (SMRs). We are also studying a French variant as well as American SMRs. I once again emphasise that we will prioritise safety, financial expediency and logistics.”

MTAI has set up a working group “for the purpose of discussing the matters related to the expediency of deploying small modular reactors, as well as to carry out analyses and define the sequence of further steps in order to select the necessary technologies”. According to Minister Gnel Sanosyan, there is a lot of work to be done: “About two years is needed for preparatory work, from 8 to 10 years for construction.” He added that it is necessary to understand what capacity the new NPP should have, and this must be decided by taking into account many factors – not for a short period, but for the next 100 years.

“For example, we must calculate how much electricity we will supply to Iran, whether we will supply it or not, whether we will supply electricity to Georgia. We need to understand what the relations between Armenia and Turkey will be like, whether Turkey will buy electricity from Armenia, because now the eastern regions of Turkey need it,” he added. Sanosyan said it is also necessary to calculate volumes of local consumption to assess the scale of dependence on the NPP. While the Russia project is well advanced, the USA is now proposing the construction of SMRs. The Minister said this proposal has not yet been studied from a technical point of view, it may take several months. However, he gave assurances that by the end of the year the Armenian government would “decide on the issue of capacity”.

Suren Bznuni, a specialist in nuclear and radiation safety, considers the existence of an “economic justification” and safety issues to be the most important consideration. He said it is necessary to build a safe and economically profitable reactor, regardless of whether it is Russian or American. A nuclear power plant with a capacity of 1,000 MWe, in his opinion, could be problematic for Armenia in terms of grid stability, given that the current NPP is only 400 MWe.

ANPP Board member Vahram Petrosyan believes Armenia would do better with two smaller plants each with a capacity of 500-600 MWe. He noted that Armenia’s total electricity demand does not exceed 1,200 MWe and that hydro, solar and thermal plants can easily make up the difference. “A high-capacity nuclear power plant can become a headache for the country. We must consider all options and send the right order to the government," Petrosayn told Hetq.

However, UN National Expert on Energy Ara Marjanyan has said that building a new nuclear reactor at Metsamor is essential to enable Armenia to constantly generate nuclear power and that a new 1,000-1,200 MWe reactor would be required by 2036. He stressed that the new reactor must be completed before decommissioning the existing one. He noted that under the agreement concluded with Russia a roadmap is to be developed and a final decision is to be made on the type and other technical parameters of the reactor. The construction work will commence by the end of 2024 or early 2025 and the cost is estimated at $3-5bn. “I think this is a reasonable expenditure, and it is imperative for Armenia to have constant nuclear generation on its territory. I think the construction will take 10-12 years,” he said.

Russia Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin said recently that Russia is ready to discuss the financial issues and parameters of building NPPs in the territories of Eurasian Economic Union members, including Armenia. He was addressing the Eurasia Is My Home exhibition which was also attended by Prime Minister Pashinyan. The attendees were briefed on Rosatom’s two-unit VVER-1200 project in Belarus. The first unit is already operational while the second is undergoing tests. Mishustin told Pashinyan that Belarusian companies financed just over 40% of the costs. Pashinyan reportedly noted that Rosatom was not offering reactors with capacity lower than 1,200MWe. In response, Rosatom Director General Likhachev told Pashinyan that Rosatom can build reactors with capacities of 1,000, 600 or 400 MWe, but it would be more expensive.


 

Image: Metsamor nuclear power plant (courtesy of ANPP)



Car with Armenian flag vandalized with references to Pride and racial slur in Glendale

June 12 2023
ABC 7 Los Angeles
Story by KABC • 1h ago

Ahateful act of vandalism was discovered last Friday, just days after a violent confrontation between LGBTQ activists and a group of conservative protesters outside a Glendale school board meeting.

Police say someone scratched messages referencing Pride into a car displaying the Armenian flag.

It was parked on East Lomita Avenue near Granada Street.

The markings included a racial slur on the hood.

Police are investigating the incident as a hate crime.

Detectives say the car is undergoing forensic testing.

Anyone with information should call Glendale Police.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/car-with-armenian-flag-vandalized-with-references-to-pride-and-racial-slur-in-glendale/ar-AA1cs54M

“Azerbaijan is better seen and heard in Brussels” – Armenian political scientist

June 12 2023
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Armenia and the EU

“Azerbaijan and Georgia are much more visible, they are better seen and heard in Brussels than Armenia,” the head of the Regional Center for Democracy and Security, political scientist Tigran Grigoryan, said on returning from Brussels. According to him, Armenia is absent from many important EU projects, and the country is mentioned mainly in the context of the conflict with Azerbaijan and to some extent in the context of promoting the reform process.

The political scientist dwelled in detail on the approaches of various EU actors and structures to the Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations, the problems that he noticed in the position of the European Union, in Armenia-EU relations.

From June 4 to 8 a small group of Armenian experts visited Brussels with the support of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation. During the visit meetings were held in various structures of the European Union, including with members of the European Parliament. There was also a closed discussion with European experts.


  • Why were the Armenian-Azerbaijani talks postponed? Opinions
  • Video from Baku with interviews of Armenian prisoners
  • “Armenia is not Russia’s ally in the war with Ukraine” – Pashinyan interview with CNN

The political scientist came to the conclusion that the EU does not intend to take responsibility for the settlement of the conflict. Grigoryan stated that among high-ranking actors and in general in EU structures there is an understanding of the realities in the context of Armenia-Azerbaijan relations and awareness of the seriousness and complexity of the existing problems:

“Perhaps this is one of the reasons why it has been constantly emphasized that the EU is not a mediator of negotiations, but their facilitator. More active involvement in negotiations will also mean greater responsibility for the possible negative consequences that may arise as a result of this process.”

The head of the EU monitoring mission announced his intention to open three new points for monitoring the border with Azerbaijan. Commentary by an Armenian political scientist

The analyst believes that Yerevan made many “painful concessions” but received nothing in return:

“And all this in the conditions of the policy of creeping military aggression pursued by Azerbaijan.”

He argues that the policy of the Armenian authorities over the past year, the purpose of which was to ensure international consolidation around Armenia, has obviously failed. As a justification for his opinion, Grigoryan said that in various EU structures, the responsibility for all the failures in the negotiation process is laid on the Armenian side:

“We are also talking about the problems that have recently arisen within the framework of the format operating through the mediation of the head of the European Council, Charles Michel, and the failure to comply with previously reached agreements regarding the unblocking of regional communications.”

According to the political scientist, there is no such question even at the level of “theoretical discussions”.

Grigoryan says that the approach of various EU structures in relations with Azerbaijan is mostly too pragmatic, despite the fact that behind closed doors many speak negatively about Baku’s policy and the situation in this country as a whole.

A regular meeting between the President of Azerbaijan and the Prime Minister of Armenia took place in Chisinau. In the end, only the date of the next negotiation was reported

According to Grigoryan, at least two of the officials who are to some extent involved in the Armenia-Azerbaijan negotiations and who have relevant information share this opinion.

The political scientist emphasizes that this assessment of the realities differs significantly from the optimistic statements that have been heard recently from high-ranking mediators:

“There is an awareness in Brussels that it will be an extremely difficult task to reach agreements on the most important issues in a short period of time.”

The analyst says that various EU structures and officials focus on the issue of protecting the rights of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh, but find it difficult to talk about specific mechanisms:

“In particular, there are no substantive ideas in Brussels, no substantive vision regarding a possible new format of negotiations between Baku and Stepanakert.”

According to Grigoryan’s view, the officials involved in the process are sure that without active international participation, it is pointless to talk about the security of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh. At the same time, in a conversation with Armenian experts, they admitted:

  • “Baku is unlikely to agree to serious international interference in issues related to Nagorno-Karabakh.”
  • “The EU does not have serious levers of influence on Azerbaijan.”

What is known about the upcoming talks in Chisinau between the Prime Minister of Armenia and the President of Azerbaijan, the expectations of Western mediators, as well as the opinion of a political scientist

High-ranking European officials were unable to give a clear answer to this question.

“Only one of them suggested that in the event of such a scenario, the EU mediation mission would most likely end,” Grigoryan said.

EU officials have no serious concerns about the possible export of Russian gas to Europe through Azerbaijan. The opinions expressed by them on this issue differed from each other, but Grigoryan classifies them in this way:

  • “This statement is not true.”
  • “Even if some amount of Russian gas is exported to the EU through Azerbaijani infrastructure, its share is small. In this sense, the possibility of exporting Russian gas to the EU through Turkey is more worrying.”
  • “There are no sanctions against Russian gas, even the EU continues to buy Russian gas.”

https://jam-news.net/armenia-and-the-eu/

Pashinyan to testify before parliamentary commission probing 2020 war

Panorama
Armenia – June 12 2023

Nikol Pashinyan is set to testify before the parliamentary commission tasked with investigating the 2020 Artsakh war.

The commission has sent a formal invitation to the Armenian premier to attend its meeting on June 20, the National Assembly Standing Committee on Defense and Security said in a statement on Monday.

Pashinyan has agreed to answer questions of the commission, it added.

Opposition MP criticizes Armenian government’s reservists call-up plan

Panorama
Armenia – June 12 2023

Opposition MP Tigran Abrahamyan has called out the Armenian government for its poor military call-up plan.

The Armenian Defense Ministry announced the start of a three-month call-up of more than 2,700 army reservists for training and exercises on May 1.

In a social media post on Monday, Abrahamyan, secretary of the opposition Pativ Unem faction, highlighted the trainings for reserve forces, but claimed their main goals were pushed into the background.

He deplored the call-up of those reservists who completed their military service 3-4 years ago and took part in the 2020 war, stating they “are in good shape and need no further trainings.”

“If the main objective is to boost the combat readiness of reservists, the trainings should involve first of all those who served in the army 7-8 years ago or more,” the deputy wrote.

“The Defense Ministry’s call-up of a war participant before he could receive his university diploma indicates that the government does not seek to meet the priorities set by the law, but to execute a plan,” Abrahamyan added.

Today is legendary commander Monte Melkonian’s memorial day

Panorama
Armenia – June 12 2023

12 June marks the 30th death anniversary of legendary Armenian commander, philosopher and warrior Monte Melkonian.

Monte Melkonian was born in 1957 at Visalia Municipal Hospital in Visalia, California to Charles and Zabel Melkonian. He was the third of four children born to a self-employed cabinetmaker and an elementary-school teacher. By all accounts, Melkonian was described as an all-American child who joined the Boy Scouts and was a pitcher in Little League baseball. Melkonian's parents rarely talked about their Armenian heritage with their children, often referring to the place of their ancestors as the "Old Country."

In the spring of that year, the family also traveled across Turkey to visit the town of Merzifon, where Melkonian's maternal grandparents were from. Merzifon's population at the time was 23,475 but was almost completely devoid of its once 17,000-strong Armenian population that was wiped out during the Armenian Genocide in 1915. They did find one Armenian family of the three that was living in the town, however, Melkonian soon learned that the only reason this was so, was because the head of the family in 1915 had exchanged the safety of his family in return for identifying all the Armenians in the town to Turkish authorities during the genocide. Monte would later confide to his wife that "he was never the same after that visit….He saw the place that had been lost."

Upon his return to California Monte returned to his education. In high school, he was exceeding all standards and having a hard time finding new academic challenges. Instead of graduating high school early, as was suggested by his principal, Monte found an alternative thanks to his father: a study abroad program in East Asia. At the age of 15 Monte traveled to Japan for a new chapter in his young life. While there he began making money teaching English which helped finance his travels through several Southeast Asian countries. This introduced him to several new cultures, new philosophies, new languages, and in several cases, like his travels through Vietnam, new skills that would become immensely valuable in his later life as a soldier. Returning to the United States, he graduated from high school and entered the University of California, Berkeley, majoring in ancient Asian history and Archeology. In 1978 he helped to organize an exhibition of Armenian cultural artifacts at one of the university’s libraries. The section of the exhibit dealing with the 1915-23 genocide was removed by university authorities, at the request of the Turkish consul general in San Francisco. The display that was removed was eventually reinstalled following a campus protest movement. Monte eventually completed his undergrad work in under three years. Upon graduating, he was accepted into the archeology graduate program at the University of Oxford. However, Monte chose to forgo this opportunity, and instead chose to begin his lifelong struggle for the Armenian Cause.

On October 6, 1990, Monte arrived in what was then still Soviet Armenia. During the first 8 months in Armenia, Melkonian worked in the Armenian Academy of Sciences, where he prepared an archaeological research monograph on Urartian cave tombs, which was posthumously published. Seta and Monte were married at the monastery of Geghart in August 1991.

Finding himself on Armenian soil after many years, he wrote in a letter that he found a lot of confusion among his compatriots. Armenia faced enormous economic, political and environmental problems at every turn, problems that had festered for decades. New political forces bent on dismantling the Soviet Union were taking Armenia in a direction that Monte believed was bound to exacerbate the crisis and produce more problems.

Under these circumstances, it quickly became clear to Monte that, for better or for worse, the Soviet Union had no future and the coming years would be perilous ones for the Armenian people. He then focused his energy on Nagorno-Karabakh. “If we lose Karabakh,” the bulletin of the Karabakh Defense Forces quoted him as saying, "we turn the final page of the Armenian history." He believed that, if Azeri forces succeeded in deporting Armenians from Karabakh, they would advance on Zangezur and other regions of Armenia. Thus, he saw the fate of Karabakh as crucial for the long-term security of the entire Armenian nation.

On September 12 (or 14) 1991 Monte travelled to the Shahumian region (north of Nagorno-Karabakh), where he fought for three months in the fall of 1991. There he participated in the capture of Erkej, Manashid and Buzlukh villages.

On February 4, 1992 Melkonian arrived in Martuni as the regional commander. Upon his arrival the changes were immediately felt: civilians started feeling more secure and at peace as Azeri armies were pushed back and were finding it increasingly difficult to shell Martuni's residential areas with GRAD missiles.

In April 1993, Melkonian was one of the chief military strategists who planned and led the operation to fight Azeri fighters and capture the region of Kalbajar of Azerbaijan which lies between the Republic of Armenia and former NKAO. Armenian forces captured the region in four days of heavy fighting, sustaining far fewer fatalities than the enemy.

Monte was killed in the abandoned Azerbaijani village of Merzili in the early afternoon of June 12, 1993 during the Battle of Aghdam. According to Markar Melkonian, Monte's older brother and author of his biography, Monte died in the waning hours of the evening by enemy fire during an unexpected skirmish that broke out with several Azerbaijani soldiers who had gotten lost. Monte died in the arms of his closest and most trusted comrades.

He was buried with military honors at the Yerablur Military Pantheon in Yerevan on June 19.