Asbarez: Azerbaijan Continues its State Policy of Aggression, Says Yerevan

A house belonging to an Armenian family pillaged by Azeris in Sumgait in 1988

Armenia’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement on the 34th anniversary of the massacres of Armenians in Sumgait, stressing that Azerbaijan continues its state policy of aggression and Armenophobia to this day.

Below is the text of the statement.

34 years ago, from February 27 to 29, with the organization of the Soviet Azerbaijani authorities and the connivance of law enforcement, the massacres of the Armenian population in the city of Sumgait were carried out, resulting in the killing of hundreds of Armenians, including women, children, elderly, and forcible displacement of thousands.

Mass killings and tortures against the Armenians, that were aimed at forcibly suppressing the democratic _expression_ of will of the Armenian of Artsakh and the exercise of their inalienable right to self-determination on the basis of existing legal mechanisms, later continued in Baku, Kirovabad, and other settlements of Azerbaijan with Armenian population. Azerbaijan responded to the _expression_ of the will of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh to free and secure life in their homeland by carrying out a policy of collective punishment against Armenians, which later turned into full-scale war unleashed against the people of Nagorno-Karabakh.

The massacres of Armenians in Sumgait received a wide international response. A relevant condemnation resolution was adopted by the European Parliament.

In continuation of the same policy, the Azerbaijani armed forces carried out a complete ethnic cleansing of all Armenian settlements that fell under their control during the aggression against Artsakh on September 27, 2020, taking cruel revenge on many detained civilians, prisoners of war, destroying, vandalizing Armenian cultural and religious monuments and sanctuaries.The decision of the UN International Court of Justice on the application of provisional measures within the framework of the “International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination” issued on December 7, 2021, demonstrated the fact that more than three decades after the Sumgait atrocities Azerbaijan continues its policy of racial hatred towards Armenians and the destruction of the Armenian cultural heritage.Today, we pay tribute to the memory of the innocent victims of the mass atrocities in Sumgait and other settlements, and emphasize that Armenophobia and the threat of use of force remain Azerbaijan’s state policy, which clearly contradicts the regional and international efforts aimed at a peaceful, developing and sustainable region.

AW: Creative residency in Brussels opens to artists from Armenia

Creative Armenia and the Boghossian Foundation are pleased to announce the 2022 edition of the East-West Residency, a one-month creative residency at the cultural haven of the Villa Empain in Brussels. 

In August 2022, three cutting-edge artists from Armenia will head to the Villa to meet their European counterparts, explore and create in Brussels, bring Armenian culture to the European art scene, and return to Armenia to pursue their new creations.

“We are proud of Armenia’s extraordinary artists,” said Garin Hovannisian, founding director of Creative Armenia. “And we are delighted to be encouraging a new season of their creation and collaboration in Europe.”

Already in its fourth year, East-West Residency is the first-ever residency for Armenian artists in Europe. Previous residents include art director and calligrapher Ruben Malayan, art historian and curator Vigen Galstyan, filmmaker and producer Ophelia Harutyunyan, dancer and choreographer Rima Pipoyan, and writer and lecturer Tigran Amiryan.

“The Villa is once again pleased to open its doors to Armenia,” said Louma Salamé, general director of the Boghossian Foundation. “We look forward to welcoming the 2022 East-West Residents in Brussels very soon.”

The applications for the 2022 East-West Residency are now open for all artists and creators residing in Armenia. Applications are due by April 15, 2022.

The East-West Residency is a collaboration of Creative Armenia and the Boghossian Foundation, which entered into a partnership in 2018. Creative Armenia is a global arts foundation for the Armenian people that discovers, develops, and champions innovative talents across the arts. The Boghossian Foundation was created in 1992 by Robert Boghossian and his two sons, Jean and Albert, jewelers of Armenian origin, with the primary objective of contributing to development and education.




Detroit’s Friends of Artsakh, ACAA Artsakh Fund renovate home of Artsakh fallen hero

The family of Goruyn Soghomonyan

The renovation of martyred commander Goruyn Soghomonyan’s house was completed earlier this year with the financial contributions from Detroit’s Friends of Artsakh in collaboration with the ACAA Artsakh Fund

Friends of Artsakh was created during the 2020 Artsakh War in Detroit, Michigan to raise funds to help and contribute to projects supporting Artsakh and its people.

The renovation of Soghomonyan’s home was initiated when Friends of Artsakh was made aware of the family’s living conditions. During the war, a bomb exploded in their backyard, causing structural damage. The house, already in need of renovations, was in an unlivable condition. Soghomonyan’s dream was to raise his three daughters in their ancestral home in the village of Dzaghgashad in Artsakh, where they all lived with his mother Elmira. The house has been in their family for more than 100 years. Friends of Artsakh of Detroit decided to embark on the project with the help of the ACAA Artsakh Fund, who planned and arranged the construction work.

In September 2021, Friends of Artsakh and ACAA Artsakh Fund representatives went to the village of Dzaghgashad in Artsakh to evaluate the situation and plan the renovation of the house. It was evident that the structure was unsafe for the family to live in and was in need of immediate repairs. Construction began immediately and was completed by January 2022. This project was made possible because of the generous donations from the Detroit community, including Soghomonyan’s sisters who reside in Michigan. 

Soghomonyan was respected and loved by his soldiers. He was a brave and just commander, loyal to his fellow soldiers until the last day of his life. 

Goruyn Soghomonyan

He was born and raised in his ancestral village of Dzaghgashad in the Askeran region of Artsakh. After graduating Mesrop Mashtots University in Stepanakert, he joined the Artsakh Armed Forces. On April 2, 2016, he was assigned as a commander over a special unit of 10 men in Ghurband, Aghdam. With his sniper skills, they disbanded three enemy commanders and attacked a large number of Azeri troops. The enemy fled in panic, unable to break through the defense line. Soghomonyan was awarded the Baghramyan medal for heroism for his bravery during the April 2016 war in Artsakh.

When the 2020 war started on September 27, Soghomonyan was on the front line ready to defend his homeland once again. As the commander of the Rapid Reaction Squad, with the rank of captain, he led his special unit to break through the enemy’s line, seized two enemy positions and caused heavy losses to the enemy’s manpower. Soghomonyan confiscated ammunition and important documents, mined the whole area and returned without any casualties. On October 31, 2020, he was nominated for the rank of major. He was supposed to return to the positions the same day after receiving another combat mission, but unfortunately, he was killed that night. Soghomonyan was awarded the Order of Courage.

Goruyn Soghomonyan’s medals displayed at his house

Dzovinar Hatsakordzian (Hamakorzian) is a regular contributor to the Armenian Weekly.


Artsakh officials fight cultural erasure

The damage caused to the Holy Savior Ghazanchetsots Cathedral following the two strikes on October 8, 2020 (Office of the Human Rights Defender of Artsakh)

On February 3, Minister of Culture of Azerbaijan Anar Karimov told local media that they intended to establish a working group of specialists who “know the history, culture and writing  of Caucasian Albania.” The group would remove the physical traces of Armenian heritage from religious sites in Artsakh/Nagorno Karabakh and thus implement the history falsification policy of the Azerbaijani authorities, which concocts an “Albanian” origin of Armenian churches. Earlier this year, during a visit to the Hadrut region of Artsakh, currently under Azerbaijani control, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev stated at Surb Astvatsatsin Church in the village of Tsakuri (Tsaghkavank), “Armenians have desecrated our mosques as well as the old Albanian temples. But we will restore them. All of these Armenian inscriptions are fake and were added later.” 

Commenting on the manifestations of Azerbaijani vandalism, National Assembly of the Artsakh Republic member and Doctor of Historical Sciences Vahram Balayan noted, “Azerbaijan’s ambitions of conquest towards the Armenian territories are not new. Back in the early 20th century, when Musavat Azerbaijan was founded, these ambitions not only grew but also became systemic and continued during the Soviet period.”

In the 1970s, another state program of Albanization of Armenian cultural heritage was launched in Azerbaijan, when an attempt was made to present the historical and cultural monuments of the Nagorno Karabakh Oblast and adjacent Armenian territories as Albanian. 

“It should be noted that not only Armenian but also several foreign scholars addressed this issue. Back in ancient times, Greek and Roman historians stated in their works that the right  bank of the Kura River was Armenian and therefore Azerbaijan’s claims about the elimination of Albanian traces by Armenians have little to do with the objective reality. The preserved source materials also contain the genealogy of the descendants of the Armenian monastic patriarchs for centuries. All these actions of the Azerbaijani authorities aim to appropriate the Armenian historical and cultural heritage, and it is our obligation to fight against it with all our might,” Balayan said. 

According to official data, after the war of 2020, at least 1,456 significant Armenian monuments went under Azerbaijani occupation, including 161 monasteries and churches; 591 khachkars; 345 tombstones, tombs and cemeteries; 208 sanctuaries; and 10 state and 2 private museums.

Adviser to the President of the Artsakh Republic Lusine Gharakhanyan, who held the post of Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports during and after the war, noted, ”Azerbaijan is fighting against the historical and cultural heritage of Artsakh at the highest state level, destroying Christian monuments of Armenian origin on the one hand, and misappropriating them. They attribute them to the Caucasian Albanian culture, and thus to the Azerbaijani one. In other words, as Hamlet Petrosyan [an Armenian historian, archaeologist and anthropologist] says, this is mediated embezzlement. The implementation of such a policy at the state level is a cultural genocide, a far-reaching expansion, ignoring all international laws that stipulate the preservation of the universal historical and cultural heritage. We have called on the relevant international organizations to take practical steps in order to prevent the cultural genocide, perpetrated at the level of the President of Azerbaijan, with renewed vigor in the occupied part of our homeland. Nevertheless, it is a fact is that today the Holy Saviour Ghazanchetsots Cathedral in Shushi is vandalized and defaced.”

The damage caused to the Holy Savior Ghazanchetsots Cathedral following the two strikes on October 8, 2020 (Office of the Human Rights Defender of Artsakh)

A few days after the November 9 trilateral ceasefire statement, the Kanach Zham Church in Shushi was found in a state of disrepair, particularly its dome and bell tower. According to the Fact Investigation Platform (FIP) the source of this information is a publication by an Azerbaijani Facebook user named Sevinc Asadullayeva. 

Since the ceasefire was established, the Holy Mother of God Church in Mekhakavan and the khachkar in the village of Arakel in Hadrut have been completely destroyed. “This is an ethnocide, a dangerous process. We can say that the war is going on, since to eradicate culture means to completely eradicate all the attributes of identity, national self-consciousness, values, because we have emotional, behavioral and connection with all these monuments,” added Gharakhanyan.

It should be noted that on December 7, the UN International Court of Justice obliged Azerbaijan to “take all the necessary measures to prevent the incitement and promotion of racial hatred and discrimination against ethnic Armenians, including by Azerbaijani officials and state institutions” and to “prevent and punish acts of vandalism and desecration against Armenian cultural heritage, including churches and other places of worship, monuments, landmarks, cemeteries and artifacts.”

Nevertheless, Gharakhanyan does not have much faith in the relevant international structures. “As an academic and as a state official, I am deeply disappointed with the fact that UNESCO voted for Azerbaijan in the midst of the war. This creates an atmosphere of distrust in the organization, which has a mission to preserve the universal cultural heritage,” she said.

Artsakh Human Rights Defender Gegham Stepanyan is not optimistic either. Over the past year, Armenian authorities have used various tools to counter Azerbaijani actions. Reports and letters have been sent to international organizations. Public statements have regularly been made on the issue. A few months after the end of the war, the staff of the Human Rights Defender of the Artsakh Republic published a report on the cases of vandalism of Armenian cultural heritage in Artsakh by Azerbaijan. As Stepanyan said, “The purpose of our report was to alarm the international community about the threat to Armenian cultural heritage in the territories occupied by Azerbaijan. Unfortunately, the international community has not taken any clear steps so far, and this is one of the main reasons why the Azerbaijani side freely continues its policy of desecrating our monuments and distorting their history. The statement of the Minister of Culture of Azerbaijan that a working group is being formed in Azerbaijan to remove the Armenian inscriptions from the churches shows that Azerbaijan, with its cynical behavior, dares to oppose the decision of the International Court of Justice. The Court will be informed about such a step by Azerbaijan, and we will demand from the Court to use all its tools to implement its own decision. At the same time, we will continue to work on monitoring the situation of cultural monuments and will consistently alert about all the ongoing crimes.”

Kanach Zham after the destruction (Office of the Human Rights Defender of Artsakh)

President of the European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy Kaspar Karampetian, who for years raised the issues of protection of the rights of the people of Artsakh with the representatives of various European structures, also commented: 

“The preservation of the Armenian cultural heritage in Artsakh, in particular after the war in 2020 has constantly been in the focus of our attention. During all our recent meetings with dozens of decision-makers in Brussels, both on the EU level and on the national level, we have been emphasizing the Azerbaijani policy of erasure of the Armenian cultural heritage in the occupied territories of Artsakh as well as the necessity to actively fight against it. We intend to undertake concrete steps in this direction in the near future and also mobilize our committees across Europe. The EU and relevant international organizations have the moral obligation to put effective pressure on the authoritarian regime of Azerbaijan to immediately end its destructive policies, including cultural genocide and history falsification.”

 

Siranush Sargsyan is a historian and political scientist. She’s earned her degrees from Artsakh State University and the Public Administration Academy of the Republic of Armenia. Her master thesis focused on the issues surrounding the development of the party system in Nagorno-Karabakh. She’s taught history in a village in Martuni and has served as the chief specialist of the Republic of Artsakh National Assembly in the Standing Committee on Science, Education, Culture, Youth and Sports. Siranush takes great interest in conflict resolution, gender equality and education.


Reflection on the “Armenia-Iran: Historical Past and Present” International Conference

Weekly columnist Yeghia Tashjian pictured with Iranian diplomats, conference organizers and participants at the Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Yerevan

The Iranian Studies Department of the Oriental Studies of the Armenian National Academy of Sciences, together with the Iranian Cultural Center of the Embassy of Islamic Republic of Iran at Yerevan and Yerevan State University, organized a two-day international conference from February 9-10, 2022 titled “Armenia-Iran Historical Past and Present” dedicated to the establishment of diplomatic relations between both countries. There were more than 20 speakers, diplomats and scholars (Armenians and Iranians), and I was one of them. Iranian-Armenian MPs Robert Beglarian and Ara Shaverdian were also in attendance.

The conference aimed to highlight the history of Armenian-Iranian relations, ranging from political and cultural to economic relations and came up with recommendations to push this relation to different levels. The Iranian Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Armenia H.E., Mr. Abbas Badakhshan Zohouri in his opening speech for the conference highlighted the geostrategic importance of the Iran-Armenia border; the decision of the Iranian government to open a consulate in Kaban, Syunik; the geopolitical significance of the North-South Transport Corridor; and increasing the trade turnover between both countries to $1 billion.

Weekly columnist Yeghia Tashjian with the Iranian Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Armenia H.E. Mr. Abbas Badakhshan Zohouri

The following topics were addressed:

Armenian scholars pointed to the civilizational relations between both states, the importance of preserving the current border, the Pan-Turkic threats and Iran’s passive diplomacy during the 2020 Artsakh war. They also expressed concerns regarding the threat of the “Zangezur Corridor” and Azerbaijan’s territorial claims on Armenia.

Iranian scholars pointed out that the 2020 war on Artsakh was not just a war against Armenia, but also Iran. They hinted that by establishing a “Zangezur Corridor,” Turkey-Azerbaijan-Israel are trying to cut Iran’s alternative routes to Europe and Russia. They stressed the importance of the North-South Corridor for both countries, the increase of trade turnover to more than $1 billion and negotiations regarding the free economic zone in Meghri.

Interestingly, none touched on possible military cooperation between both countries.

My Recommendations for the Strengthening of Armenia-Iran Relations

In my concluding speech during the conference, I came up with the following recommendations:

If in the future, Iran joins the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), it would have better access to Eurasian, Russian and European markets. This accession would also provide EAEU member states with increased access to the Persian Gulf and increase trade and give stronger impetus and incentive for both sides (Iran and other EAEU members) to pursue common interests in third-party states like in the Levant. So Russia and Iran would have stronger cooperation in the Levant and other regions. Hence, they will work to protect their shared economic interests. Therefore, with the unblocking of regional trade routes, in the long run, Armenia would have access to the Levantine markets and reach the Eastern Mediterranean by rail. Iran should facilitate this project so that Armenia would have access to the seas through Iran and not Turkey.

Both Armenia and Iran could launch rapid joint cooperation through joint venture plans and also through Iran’s investments in Armenia’s highways, especially from the Norduz border crossing to Yerevan in order to widen the capacity of the North-South Corridor. From the Iranian perspective, this would widen not only Armenian-Iranian and regional trade, but also promote Iran’s geo-economic interests in Armenia. Such steps may further attract Indian, Chinese and European investments, which would empower Armenia’s security and stability.

Both Armenia and Iran can also have military cooperation for the sake of regional stability and to ensure that geopolitical borders of regional countries will remain stable and unharmed, especially in Armenia, and to ensure that states like Israel and the US will not try to make a scapegoat of Armenia and weaken Armenia for the sake of their plans in the Caucasus. For this reason, an intelligence cooperation center should be created both in Armenia and Iran where both sides can share, analyze and assess regional threats and terror activities that may expose a threat to both countries and regional securities. To facilitate this process, direct communication channels must be established between the security service institutions of both countries. The target of this initiative should be pan-Turkic and Jihadi terrorist groups,

Opening an Iranian consulate in Syunik is the right step; however, a military coordinator/attaché is needed to analyze the military developments on the border and directly report to Tehran. The opening of the consulate will pave the way for other states to take similar steps and preserve Armenia’s sovereignty with international backing on Syunik.

Communication needs to be enhanced between Armenia and the Diaspora communities in Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon in order to compare and assess Iranian intentions and policies in the Middle East and South Caucasus. These communities can act as secondary embassies to facilitate communication and information sharing between different Iranian and pro-Iranian organizations and the Republic of Armenia. For these reasons, having strong communities in Lebanon and Syria is in the interest of both Armenia and Iran. 

After our conference, the Iranian ambassador invited us for a reception at his embassy hall. During a three-hour meeting, in a positive atmosphere, we discussed with the Iranian ambassador and the diplomats about the current challenges and the future of bilateral ties between both countries, geopolitical concerns and threats, and provided suggestions.

Conclusion and Reflection 

From this conference and meeting with Iranian diplomats and scholars, I have come to the following conclusion. 

  • Armenia cannot expect more from Iran. Iran has done its share and now expects Yerevan to positively respond. Iran will never militarily intervene in any possible future border crisis between Armenia and Azerbaijan. What Iran can do is to use some hard power to send messages (military exercises, redeployment of forces in the north). Iran cannot alienate and antagonize its large Iranian-Azeri community which is fully integrated into the Iranian society.
  • Iran is satisfied with the current status quo (even though it acknowledges that it has so many gaps), as long Russia doesn’t lose its sphere of influence in the Caucasus. For the time being, Iran cannot alone compete with the rising Turkish influence. 
  • Iran supports peace and economic growth in the region. The Iranian economy needs markets to export its products and modernize its industry. The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan was, to some extent, an obstacle to push for trade activities in the region. Now that both sides are engaging in “dialogue” through Russia, Iran is pushing its geo-economic ambitions forward. 
  • The North-South Transport Corridor is crucial for Iran. Iran proposed many ideas for Armenia, but is still waiting for a response from Armenian authorities. 
  • Armenia, with its Christian cultural heritage, is seen as a successful model for the Iranians to provide a civilizational dialogue and Christian-Islamic harmony and a role model that Iran can engage in similar models with other Christian countries in the world, namely the West.
  • Armenia and Iran have done so little to strengthen their cultural, trade, and political ties. 
  • For now, military-technological (arms industry) cooperation is out of the question. 
Yeghia Tashjian is a regional analyst and researcher. He has graduated from the American University of Beirut in Public Policy and International Affairs. He pursued his BA at Haigazian University in political science in 2013. In 2010, he founded the New Eastern Politics forum/blog. He was a research assistant at the Armenian Diaspora Research Center at Haigazian University. Currently, he is the regional officer of Women in War, a gender-based think tank. He has participated in international conferences in Frankfurt, Vienna, Uppsala, New Delhi and Yerevan. He has presented various topics from minority rights to regional security issues. His thesis topic was on China’s geopolitical and energy security interests in Iran and the Persian Gulf. He is a contributor to various local and regional newspapers and a presenter of the “Turkey Today” program for Radio Voice of Van. Recently he has been appointed as associate fellow at the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs at the American University of Beirut and Middle East-South Caucasus expert in the European Geopolitical Forum.


AW: Russia–Azerbaijan Declaration on Allied Interaction: Implications for Armenia

Declaration on “Allied Interaction between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Russian Federation” signed in Moscow, February 22, 2022

Since February 24, 2022, the world’s attention has been focused on the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and the US and European Union (EU) sanctions imposed on Russia. Politicians, experts and academicians are seeking to understand how and when the war will stop and what will be the short and midterm implications of Western sanctions on Russia and beyond. Armenia is not an exclusion, and debate is underway on the war’s potential political and economic implications on Armenia. However, the Russia-Ukraine war is not the only issue hotly debated in Armenia.

On February 22, just a day after the recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics’ independence and two days before the launch of the Russian special military operation, Russia and Azerbaijan signed a declaration on allied interaction in Moscow. Given the existence of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, the deployment of Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno Karabakh after the 2020 Karabakh war and the alliance between Russia and Armenia, the declaration on Russia-Azerbaijan allied interaction raised questions and concerns in Armenia. Article one of the declaration states that the Russian Federation and the Republic of Azerbaijan build their relations on the basis of allied interaction, mutual respect for independence, state sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of the state borders of the two countries. The critical question raised by Armenian experts touches upon the implications of this wording on the future of Nagorno Karabakh.

Meanwhile, to better understand what was signed by the two presidents and what implications it may have on South Caucasus regional geopolitics, it is worthy to briefly analyze the bilateral Russia-Azerbaijan relations after the collapse of the Soviet Union. While the first president of independent Azerbaijan Ayaz Mutalibov sought to maintain good relations with Russia, the second president Abulfaz Elchibey, who came to power in the summer of 1992, pursued an overt anti-Russian and pro-Turkish foreign policy based on the ideology of pan-Turkism. Elchibey’s foreign policy was a source of concern for Russia and Iran. 

After the military coup ousted Elchibey in June 1993, the longtime leader of Soviet Azerbaijan, Heydar Aliyev, returned to power. He sought to normalize relations with Russia, hoping to get Kremlin support in the war against the Nagorno Karabakh Republic. Azerbaijan joined the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in 1993; however, it did not help Azerbaijan gain significant successes during its December 1993 major offensive in Karabakh. After the May 1994 ceasefire agreement, President Aliyev pursued balanced foreign policy. He deepened Azerbaijan’s connections with Western energy giants by signing a “Contract of the Century” in September 1994. However, Aliyev was smart enough to include Russian Lukoil in these deals. 

In 1997, Azerbaijan joined Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova to establish GUAM, which was perceived as an organization to balance Russian influence in the post-Soviet space. As another manifestation of its balanced foreign policy, Azerbaijan signed a treaty of friendship, partnership and mutual security with Russia in the same year. The treaty’s first article declared that countries would base their relations on the principles of respect of territorial integrity and inviolability of borders, almost identical to the wording used in the February 2022 declaration. In 1999, Azerbaijan did not renew its participation in the Collective Security Treaty with Russia and some other post-Soviet states. 

Azerbaijan-Russia relations entered a new phase after the election of Vladimir Putin in 2000. In January 2001, Russia and Azerbaijan signed a Baku declaration during President Putin’s visit to Azerbaijan. They declared their intention to raise bilateral relations to the level of strategic partnership. The declaration mentioned the two states’ intention to develop long-term military and military-technical cooperation and again emphasized that Russia and Azerbaijan will base their relations on the principles of territorial integrity and inviolability of borders. Another essential step in bilateral relations was the January 2002 statement of presidents. Speaking about the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, Russia and Azerbaijan emphasized that regional conflicts should be solved based on the principles of international law and, first of all, on the principles of territorial integrity and inviolability of the internationally recognized borders of states.

President Ilham Aliyev sought to continue the balanced foreign policy of Azerbaijan. The launch of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum pipelines provided a solid base for rapid economic growth for Azerbaijan. In the early 2010s, Azerbaijan rejected signing an Association Agreement with the EU or joining the Eurasian Economic Union. Baku used its oil money to buy weapons from Russia, while the crackdown on Azerbaijani civil society in 2013-2014 negatively impacted Azerbaijan-West relations. The growing assertiveness of Russia in the post-Soviet space, the results of the 2008 Russia-Georgia war, 2014 events in Ukraine, the shift of US focus to the Asia Pacific, and the changes in Russia-Turkey relations since 2016 towards more cooperation and less competition have created an impression in Azerbaijan that Russian influence will increase in the region and that Baku should adapt to that reality. The 2020 Karabakh war was another demonstration that regional players such as Russia and Turkey would play a growing role in defining the parameters of the regional security architecture, while the US, NATO and EU influence will continue to decrease. 

The February 2022 declaration of allied interaction is another element of Azerbaijan’s strategy of adaptation to this reality. As we can see, the wording about territorial integrity, inviolability of borders and military and military-technical cooperation has been in bilateral relations since 1997. The only novelty of the declaration, besides symbolically raising the bilateral relations from strategic partnership to alliance level, perhaps is the provision stating that parties will deepen interaction between the armed forces, including holding joint operational and combat training activities and developing other areas of bilateral military cooperation. Another significant issue is the provision, according to which Russia and Azerbaijan may consider the possibility of providing each other with military assistance based on the UN Charter, separate international treaties, and taking into account the existing international legal obligations of each of the parties.

How may this declaration impact Nagorno Karabakh and Armenia? Azerbaijan and Russia made a tacit deal: Russia recognizes Nagorno Karabakh de jure as part of Azerbaijan, while Azerbaijan accepts de facto control of Russia over the small portion of Karabakh not invaded by Azerbaijan during the 2020 war. This declaration sends a clear signal that, most probably, Azerbaijan will not demand the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers from Karabakh in 2025. Does this mean that Russia will never recognize Karabakh independence? No. The situation in and around Karabakh resembles the situation in Abkhazia and South Ossetia from the mid-1990s until 2008, or the situation in Donetsk and Lugansk between February 2015-February 2022. In both cases, Russia de jure recognized these territories as part of Georgia and Ukraine while de facto controlling them. However, this does not prevent Russia from recognizing these entities’ independence due to the changing geopolitical environment. Thus, the task of Armenia and Armenians as a nation remains the same. Armenia should do its best to secure foreign military deployment in Nagorno Karabakh for at least the next 10 to 15 years. Another significant task is to increase the number of Armenians living there by at least 25 to 30 percent for the same period and modernize the Armenian economy and armed forces to protect Nagorno Karabakh without foreign forces if such a scenario becomes a reality.

Dr. Benyamin Poghosyan is the founder and chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies. He was the former vice president for research – head of the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense Research University in Armenia. In March 2009, he joined the Institute for National Strategic Studies as a research Fellow and was appointed as INSS Deputy Director for research in November 2010. Dr. Poghosyan has prepared and managed the elaboration of more than 100 policy papers which were presented to the political-military leadership of Armenia, including the president, the prime minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs. Dr. Poghosyan has participated in more than 50 international conferences and workshops on regional and international security dynamics. His research focuses on the geopolitics of the South Caucasus and the Middle East, US – Russian relations and their implications for the region, as well as the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. He is the author of more than 200 academic papers and articles in different leading Armenian and international journals. In 2013, Dr. Poghosyan was a Distinguished Research Fellow at the US National Defense University College of International Security Affairs. He is a graduate from the US State Department Study of the US Institutes for Scholars 2012 Program on US National Security Policy Making. He holds a PhD in history and is a graduate from the 2006 Tavitian Program on International Relations at Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.


The California Courier Online, March 3, 2022

1-        Russia-Ukraine War: This is What Happens
            When Compromise is not Achieved
            By Harut Sassounian
            Publisher, The California Courier
            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

2-        Artsakh Welcomes Putin’s Recognition of Parts of Ukraine as
Independent States

3-     Armenian journalist Aprikyan becomes national primetime news anchor in US

4-     Letters to the Editor

5-      Armenia Continues Fight Against COVID-19

************************************************************************************************************************************************

1-         Russia-Ukraine War: This is What Happens

            When Compromise is not Achieved

            By Harut Sassounian

            Publisher, The California Courier

            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

What is happening right now in Ukraine is the worst possible scenario
for both sides, in fact all sides.

First of all, this is an enormous tragedy for the people of Ukraine
who have fallen victim to the Russian invasion which should have been
avoided at all costs. No one can justify the destruction of a country
and the killing of innocent people. We should support peace, common
sense and safety of all human beings.

Let us ignore the unrelenting propaganda, misinformation,
disinformation and hypocrisy which have inundated the media before and
during the war. No need to play politics or partisanship with people’s
lives.

Let us now move from emotional statements to the real world which can
only be ignored at our own peril. Since the beginning of the world,
the powerful has always imposed his will on the weak. There is no
escape from this. It has always been this way and will continue to be
this way. All those who believe in truth and justice are sadly
mistaken. They live in a make-believe world.

Russia, as a powerful country, felt that it was being threatened by
Western powers encroaching on its sphere of influence and wanted to
protect its national interests. Whether we agree or disagree with the
Russian view is immaterial. This is how the Russians perceive the
situation. And when you are a powerful country, right or wrong, you
try to impose your will on others, one way or another. The precedent
for this situation is the Russian invasion of the Republic of Georgia
in 2008 when the latter flirted with the idea of joining NATO. Russia
occupies large parts of Georgia to this day.

Those in the West who have been making sanctimonious statements about
big bad Russia attacking an innocent country are conveniently
forgetting how the western countries themselves behaved for decades,
even centuries. The imperial powers of the United Kingdom, France,
Spain, Germany, and Italy went around the world conquering dozens of
smaller, poorer and weaker countries, subjugated them, plundered their
natural resources, killed and wounded hundreds of thousands of
natives, until they rose up and tossed the aggressors out.

The United States, the self-declared paragon of democracy and human
rights, has attacked and occupied several countries in the past
imposing its will around the world. The U.S. government has overthrown
many leaders who have refused to toe its line and submit to America’s
wishes. There are dozens of such examples, the latest of which is
Iraq. Who can forget the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, when the Soviet
Union deployed nuclear missiles in Cuba, just 90 miles away from the
United States? The two countries came to the brink of nuclear war on
that occasion. There is also the long-standing U.S. policy of the
Monroe Doctrine which states that any intervention in the political
affairs of the Americas by foreign powers is considered a hostile act
against the United States. How is this different from Putin’s
interpretation of Russia’s sphere of influence in Eastern Europe,
including Ukraine? Finally, Pres. Biden’s actions against Russia are
partially prompted by his intent to raise his record low rating of
37%. The latest Washington Post/ABC News poll showed that only 33% of
Americans approve Biden’s handling of the Russia-Ukraine crisis, while
47% disapprove.

It would have been preferable to engage in direct negotiations between
Russia and Ukraine to find a peaceful solution to the crisis. As it is
often said, “war is diplomacy by other means.” The more outside powers
such as the United States, France and the United Kingdom meddled in
this dispute, the worst it got, since each of these countries,
pretending to defend Ukraine, were in fact pursuing their own
interests. The crux of the issue is the disagreement between Russia
and the West about an alleged pledge made by the West after the
collapse of the Soviet Union that NATO will not expand to Eastern
Europe, threatening Russia’s security. Nevertheless, NATO did expand
to several Eastern European countries, which Russia viewed as a
hostile act.

Russia decided to impose its will on Ukraine, fearing that if it did
not act promptly, Ukraine would join NATO, after which it would be
impossible to neutralize the perceived danger, due to the NATO policy
of “attack on one member country is deemed an attack on all.”

There should have been a compromise found on both sides to avoid war.
Most people thought that there would be no war and that Russia was
amassing troops on Ukraine’s border to pressure it to reach a
compromise solution. Regrettably, the Russian attempt to influence
Ukraine ended in a full scale invasion destroying large parts of the
country’s infrastructure and causing untold casualties. It could be
that Ukraine refused to compromise relying on Western assurances that
it would come to its aid militarily and economically, if it resisted
Russian demands not to join NATO. In addition to providing military
hardware and economic assistance, Western countries tried to block
Russia’s actions by issuing a series of draconian sanctions, which
failed to alter its decision. The hopeful news is that Russian and
Ukrainian delegations held their first direct talks on Monday and
agreed to meet again.

Turning to the effects on Armenia of the war and sanctions on Russia,
Armenia is caught in the middle of its alliance with and reliance on
Russia and its standing with the rest of the world. As they say, when
two elephants jostle, the ant gets stomped on, regardless of which
elephant wins.

The biggest problem that Armenia has is the absence of a competent
leader who would be able to come up with a skillful solution to
extricate itself from this extremely complicated situation. Since the
start of the war, Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has not
made an official declaration. Nevertheless, on three separate
occasions, Armenia has taken sides and made statements regarding this
conflict.

The most problematic action Armenia took was last Friday when the
Council of Europe voted to suspend Russia’s membership in the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the Committee of
Ministers. Armenia was the only country that voted with Russia against
the measure. Forty two countries voted yes. Turkey shrewdly abstained
and Azerbaijan did not vote at all. Western countries will not look
too kindly at Armenia’s support for Russia. Likewise, Russia will not
look too kindly at Azerbaijan’s and Turkey’s votes. The war in Ukraine
is sure to limit Turkey’s ability to walk on a tightrope between NATO
and Russia. Azerbaijan’s similar tightrope walk will also be curtailed
by not voting with Russia in the Council of Europe, thus undermining
the declaration of “allied cooperation” signed on Feb. 22 by Russia
and Azerbaijan.

Secondly, when Armenia’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Vahan Hunanyan,
was asked if Armenia will join Russia in recognizing the
“independence” of the Ukrainian regions of Donesk and Lugnask, he
replied: “There is no such issue on [Armenia’s] agenda.” Putin will
not be pleased with that answer. He has many ways to pressure
Pashinyan to toe the Russian line in this crisis.

Finally, speaking at a meeting of the Eurasian Intergovernmental
Council in Kazakhstan on February 25, Pashinyan suggested that prompt
measures be taken “to minimize or circumvent” the anti-Russia
sanctions approved by the West following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The anti-Russia sanctions are sure to have a major impact on Armenia’s
frail economy as Russia is Armenia’s largest trading partner. As they
say, when Russia sneezes, Armenia catches a cold. The $861 million
remitted in 2021 by Armenian workers in Russia to their families in
Armenia will be sharply curtailed due to the collapsing ruble and
increased unemployment.

There is also a long-standing controversy between Armenia and Ukraine.
Both sides accuse each other of betraying their trust and siding with
their enemies.  In 2014, Armenia, along with nine other countries,
voted with Russia against a UN General Assembly resolution which
declared the pro-Russian Crimean referendum invalid. Armenians respond
by recalling that Ukraine voted in the General Assembly in 2008, for a
resolution demanding the withdrawal of “Armenian forces” from Nagorno
Karabagh. President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine announced during the
2020 Artsakh war: “We support Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and
sovereignty just as Azerbaijan always supports our territorial
integrity and sovereignty.” Furthermore, Ukraine sold lethal weapons
to Azerbaijan prior to the 2020 war.

One should not forget that there are around 500,000 Armenians who live
in Ukraine. When other countries shut down their embassies in Ukraine
and withdrew their nationals, the Armenian Embassy continued
functioning and Armenian nationals remained in Ukraine risking their
lives.

With each passing day, more innocent civilians are being killed in
Ukraine, more sanctions are being imposed on Russia and more ominous
threats are being issued. Common sense should prevail before the world
reaches a doomsday scenario.

The only solution is reaching a compromise through peaceful
negotiations. Eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth will leave everyone
blind and toothless.
************************************************************************************************************************************************
2-         Artsakh Welcomes Putin’s Recognition of Parts of Ukraine as
Independent States

President Arayik Harutyunyan of Artsakh welcomed Russia’s recognition
of the self-proclaimed republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, hailing it as
an imperative for people’s right to self-determination. Artsakh’s
parliament speaker also issued a similarly-worded statement.

During a televised address, President Vladimir Putin of Russia
announced his intention to recognize the independence of the two areas
in the Donbass region of Ukraine, whose leaders have enjoyed Russia’s
backing.

Western leaders, however, were angered by Putin’s move and asserted
that the recognition gave the Russian leader more reason to fulfill
his plan of invading Ukraine.

“The right of nations to self-determination and building one’s own
state is inalienable for every people and is a fundamental principle
of the international law,” President Harutyuyan said in a statement.

“The establishment of an independent state and its international
recognition becomes an imperative especially in the face of
existential dangers, as it is the most effective and civilized means
of preventing bloodshed and humanitarian disaster,” he added.
Harutyunyan pointed out hat the Republic of Artsakh has been fighting
for its freedom, security and state-building for decades, and has been
exposed to many trials and genocidal actions.

“Thus, we hope that the Republic of Artsakh, which has relevant
indisputable historical, political, legal and moral bases, has earned
the international recognition of its sovereign state,” he said.

Yet, having declared its independence more than 30 year ago and over
the years functioning as an independent state, the recognition of
Artsakh was never brought up by Moscow, even during the 44-Day war in
2020.

Artsakh has relations with two other unrecognized states—Abkhazia and
South Ossetia—which declared their independence following Russia’s
military conflict with Georgia.

“We congratulate the people of Donbass on the legal-political
recognition of the self-determination of the two republics,”
Tovmasyan, the Artsakh parliament speaker, said in a statement
Tuesday, February 23.

The European Union, NATO, France and Great Britain reacted to Putin’s
recognition with harsh words, calling it a breach of international law
and an effort to undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty.
************************************************************************************************************************************************

3-         Armenian journalist Aprikyan becomes national primetime
news anchor in US

ATLANTA—Tatevik Aprikyan has been named the new host of “The
Why”—Newsy’s primetime news program.

“The Why,” which premiered earlier this month on the nation’s only
free 24/7 broadcast news network, goes beyond the headlines with
hyper-visual explanatory journalism and compelling guest interviews.
Aprikyan has been at the helm of an hour-long deep dive into relevant
social, cultural and political topics.

“This will be unique programming for primetime viewers,” said Eric
Ludgood, head of Newsy. “Tatevik is an experienced journalist with
great storytelling skills and a knack for engaging audiences.”

Aprikyan has been an award-winning broadcast journalist in Seattle
since 2015. Prior to that, she was an anchor and/or reporter in
Providence, Rhode Island; Idaho Falls, Idaho; Seattle and Bellevue,
Washington.

She has been an anchor or reporter for ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC affiliate
stations. Aprikyan has covered some of the country’s biggest stories,
including the trial of the Boston Marathon bomber, the Ebola outbreak,
Affordable Care Act, US-Russia and Middle East relations and health
care (autism, scientific research and children’s health).

Originally from Yerevan, Armenia, her family moved to Seattle when she
was five years old. Aprikyan speaks Armenian, Russian and French. She
is an advocate for children’s health, serving on the board of
directors for non-profits providing humanitarian relief to orphaned
children around the world.

Born in Armenia and raised in Eastlake and Kenmore, Tatevik Aprikyan
started “playing journalist” years before she became one.

Aprikyan remembers her father buying a camcorder as one of his first
American purchases.

“I would grab anything I could — a hairbrush, the blocks we were
playing with — and just go to work,” she recalled in a recent
interview with The Seattle Times. She would narrate whatever was in
view: an airplane in the sky, a bus driving past on the street.
Aprikyan spoke little English but she learned to emulate reporters
when her parents watched local newscasts.

“This is a special opportunity at Newsy,” Aprikyan said. “We are going
to provide viewers with the kind of information that offers insight
into the complex issues of the day. It’s the kind of work that
journalists live for. It’s a chance to make a difference for our
audience.”

Hank Mendheim is the executive producer of “The Why.” An Emmy
Award-winning television executive, Mendheim most recently served as
executive producer of WLS Television’s “Windy City LIVE” in Chicago.
His television producing career spans nearly three decades creating
news and entertainment programming for A&E, Bravo, Discovery Channel,
Nat Geo, Lifetime, Animal Planet, Sundance, Hallmark Channel, Oxygen,
MSNBC and The Weather Channel.

Viewers can watch Newsy over the air using their TVs’ built-in tuners
or digital antennas, on Newsy.com, as well as on streaming devices or
services, including Apple TV, Fire TV, Pluto TV, Roku, Samsung, Sling,
Vizio and Xumo. Newsy is owned by The E.W. Scripps Company, a
diversified media company focused on creating a better-informed world.
Scripps serves communities with quality, objective local journalism
and operates a portfolio of 61 stations in 41 markets.
**********************************************************************************************************************************************

4-         Letters to the Editor

Dear Editor:

Lori Yeghiayan Friedman’s op-ed article truly resonated with me. Like
her, both my parents were Armenian, and my grandma even came from the
same place, Aintab, as her medzmama. (“Finding in Little Armenia the
roots my parents tried to bury,” The California Courier, February 17)

For children of immigrants who are born in the United States,
attending public schools, socializing and marrying non-immigrant
Americans, while always having that cultural, religious and even moral
tie to our ancestry can be confusing.

As we grow older, we’re more comfortable about how our heritage fits
into our daily lives. We want to learn about it and visit our
homelands.

The ties that bind us to “our people” are very tight; they are a
permanent facet of our identities. But there should be no amot (shame)
to our evolution into our present-day culture.

Gloria Sefton,

Trabuco Canyon, Calif.

Dear Editor:

Friedman sends a very healthy message, not just to us Armenian
Americans, but to all ethnic Americans, especially children of
immigrants — that we each realize and preserve our ethnicities in
different ways and to different degrees, and that’s OK.

Shenorhagalutyoon (thanks), Ms. Friedman.

Susan Injejikian Henry,

Glendale, Calif.

***********************************************************************************************************************************************

5-         Armenia Continues Fight Against COVID-19
Armenia continues the fight against COVID-19, as the country continues
promoting the vaccination phase. Last week, some 100,620 doses of the
Pfizer vaccine for COVID-19 were imported to Armenia in accordance
with a contract signed between the Armenian Ministry of Health and the
Pfizer pharmaceutical company.

The Pfizer vaccine will be distributed to all primary health care
clinics and mobile vaccination sites, the Armenian Ministry of Health
said.

Armenia’s Ministry of Health announced on January 11 new restrictions
to curb the fast spreading of the Covid-19 pandemic in the country.
From January 22, people above 18 must present either a vaccination
certificate or a negative recent test result prior to entering
restaurants, hotels, cinemas and other similar venues.

As of January 30, 842,212 people have been fully inoculated against
COVID-19, or approximately 28-percent of the population. About
64-percent of the population, or 1,883,413 people, has received at
least one dose of the vaccine. The highest rate of inoculation is
among people between the ages of 35-60. Only 18 to 19-percent of
citizens over the age of 65 have received two doses of the vaccine.
The vaccination mandate for employees might be responsible for the age
disparity in vaccination rates.

Since October, employees have been required to provide proof of
vaccination or a negative PCR test every 14 days to their employer.
Employees who choose not to get inoculated against the coronavirus
must take tests at their own expense. A PCR test in Armenia costs
roughly 10,000 drams (about $20).

The MoH also instituted a coronavirus “green pass” in January to enter
cultural and entertainment venues. As of January 22, people can only
enter restaurants, hotels, gyms, libraries, museums, theaters, cinemas
and other cultural sites if they present proof of vaccination, a
negative PCR test from the previous 72 hours or an antibody test from
the previous 24 hours. The mandate, which was announced on January 9,
excludes children under the age of 18, pregnant women, people who
cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons and people who have been
previously infected with the coronavirus.

The Armenian government last month made changes in the COVID-19
response measures, shortening the recommended self-isolation time from
14 days to 7 days for vaccinated people and 10 days for unvaccinated
people starting the day of an administered PCR test. The
self-isolation period for the unvaccinated can be shortened down to 7
days in case of producing a negative PCR test result.

The Armenian government cited the policies of the United States CDC
and a number of European countries. The government changed airport
regulations, allowing visitors to enter the arrival hall by
maintaining safety guidelines. The decision took effect February 1.
Armenian health authorities recorded a peak number of positive
COVID-19 cases on February 2.

The U.S. State Department since July 26, 2021 issued a Level 3 Travel
Health Notice and has warned American citizens to reconsider travel to
Armenia due to the increase in cases of the Covid-19. The State
Department also urged U.S. citizens not to travel to the
Nagorno-Karabakh region due to armed conflict.

Coronavirus cases have been steadily increasing in Armenia since mid-January.

There were 9,694 active COVID-19 cases in Armenia as of March 3.
Armenia has recorded 419,382 coronavirus cases and 9,694 deaths;
401,677 have recovered.

************************************************************************************************************************************************

************************************************************************************************************************************************

California Courier Online provides readers of the Armenian News News Service
with a few of the articles in this week’s issue of The California
Courier. Letters to the editor are encouraged through our e-mail
address, . Letters are published with
the author’s name and location; authors are required to disclose their
identity to the editorial staff (name, address, and/or telephone
numbers for verification purposes).
California Courier subscribers can change or modify mailing addresses
by emailing .

Karabakh probing Azerbaijan’s opening fire on civilians

Feb 28 2022

PanARMENIAN.Net – The Investigative Committee of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) opened a criminal case to investigate an incident which involved Azerbaijani servicemen opening fire on three Armenian civilians.

According to the press service of the Investigative Committee, the incident occurred on February 5 near the village of Khramort. The three employees of the Future Generations Fund hid from gunfire, so that not to be killed.

After the end of the 44-day war in Artsakh, the residents of of the country being periodically subjected to shelling by the Azerbaijani Armed Forces. Both civilians and servicemen have been killed.

The Azerbaijani military has also been threatening the residents of Khramort for several days now, using loudspeakers to demand that they leave their homes and surrender the settlement to Azerbaijan. According to journalist Tsovinar Barkhudaryan, a voice speaking in Armenian claims that if the villagers fail to leave the area voluntarily, the Azeris “will have to use force.”

The authorities of Artsakh have said that Russian peacekeepers deployed in the region have been notified, and that negotiations have been launched.

Two Armenian captives face 20 years in jail in Azerbaijan

Feb 28 2022

PanARMENIAN.Net – Prosecutors in Azerbaijan are seeking up to 20-year jail terms for two Armenian servicemen who were captured in May 2021 – the same month Azerbaijan’s troops first violated the borders of the country.

Azerbaijani forces violated Armenia’s border in several sections in the provinces of Syunik and Gegharkunik on May 12 and 13, 2021 and are still refusing to withdraw their troops from the area. On November 16 of that same year the Azerbaijani side launched a fresh offensive in the province of Syunik, during which Armenian soldiers were killed and taken captive. Furthermore, several Armenian soldiers were killed in Azerbaijan’s latest provocation on January 11.

Ishkhan Sargsyan and Vladimir Rafayelyan are now facing 20 and 19 years in prison, respectively, after authorities in Baku accused them of “illegally crossing the border and planting mines on roads”. According to local media reports, Sargsyan has also allegedly admitted to receiving orders to blow up the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline.

The next court hearing is scheduled for March 7.

Armenian community members joining Ukraine defense

Feb 28 2022

PanARMENIAN.Net – The Armenian community of Ukraine has condemned Russia’s military aggression, maintaining that Armenians have been living in Ukraine since the 10th century and describing the country as their homeland.

“Innocent people who have become victims of Russia’s aggression are dying today. Many of our fellow nationals have taken up arms and are standing with their Ukrainian counterparts in defense of their cities and villages. Every day the Armenians fill up the ranks of defense,” the community said in a statement on Monday, February 28.

“We, the Armenians of Ukraine, oppose the military aggression of the Russian Federation against our country and condemn the ongoing occupation. Now, side by side with the Ukrainian people, we are defending our cities, homes and loved ones.”

In the statement, the Armenians also appealed to the international community with a request to use all mechanisms to stop the aggression against Ukraine.