California Armenian Legislative Caucus Foundation announces Cottie Petrie-Norris as new member

Armenian, Czech FMs discuss regional security

Save

Share

 15:56,

YEREVAN, JULY 26, ARMENPRESS. The working visit of the Foreign Minister of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan to the Czech Republic commenced, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Vahan Hunanyan said in a statement on social media.

“Minister Mirzoyan had a tête-à-tête conversation with Foreign Minister of Czechia Jan Lipavský, followed by the meeting in an extended format. Issues related to Armenian-Czech, Armenia-EU relations and regional security were discussed”, the Spokesperson said.

US offers help to link Armenia, Azerbaijan

Washington (AFP) – Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Monday offered US assistance in building ties between Armenia and Azerbaijan, encouraging a permanent settlement between the adversaries two years after a Russian-brokered truce.

In separate calls with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Blinken said that the two nations have a "historic opportunity to achieve peace in the region."

Blinken "offered the United States' assistance in facilitating regional transportation and communication linkages," State Department spokesman Ned Price said.

Aliyev and Pashinyan met under EU mediation in May to discuss a future peace treaty. Their foreign ministers followed up with talks this month in neighboring Georgia.

Russia in 2020 brokered a truce that ended a six-week war that claimed more than 6,500 lives. Russia deployed some 2,000 peacekeepers, with Armenia agreeing to cede swathes of territory it had controlled for decades.

The United States, Russia and France — which all have strong Armenian diasporas — formed the so-called Minsk group that sought to broker a resolution amid the first war in the 1990s over Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian-populated region internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan.

The United States has drastically scaled back contact with Russia since its invasion of Ukraine in February, although Washington has maintained indirect contact with Moscow on some international issues such as Iran.

Price said the United States was ready to engage with "likeminded partners" to support peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Kuwaiti-Armenian philanthropist Geragos Kuyumjian launches Shop in Armenia campaign

Save

Share

 16:17,

YEREVAN, JULY 26, ARMENPRESS. Kuwaiti-Armenian philanthropist and businessman Geragos Kuyumjian is again visiting Armenia and is promoting his Shop in Armenia campaign, a project aimed at encouraging inbound travelers from the Diaspora to shop here. The project was launched in 2019 but the work was left unfinished due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The essence of this campaign is to encourage our compatriots to buy the products they need here in Armenia. Why does one need to bring products from abroad if there is everything here?” Kuyumjian said.

He believes this campaign would be economically beneficial for local businesses and producers if Diaspora-Armenians start doing most of their shopping in Armenia during every visit.

Kuyumjian says his initiative received positive reaction from government officials at the Office of the High Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs and Tourism Committee.

Apart from this campaign, Kuyumjian is actively working in the direction of promoting Armenia in the Arab media, and trying to stand by Armenia and Artsakh with various support programs.

The Kuwaiti-Armenian businessman said that there is a lack of information in Arab countries on the Armenian Genocide.

“In general, we’ve done a poor job in terms of presenting Armenian issues in the Arab world. We have been unable to present the issue to the Arab people as required. Many don’t have a complete understanding on the Armenian Genocide and other Armenian issues. And I decided to write articles and present the Armenian issues and counter the denialist positions,” he said.

Kuyumjian also founded the Nerses Shnorhali award to encourage students at the Aleppo and Kuwait colleges.

Blinken talks ‘historic opportunity’ for peace in call with Armenia, Azerbaijan leaders

THE HILL

Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Monday held separate calls with the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, offering U.S. support for what he called a “historic opportunity” to achieve peace in the region.

The calls followed face-to-face meetings between the foreign ministers of both countries in Georgia on July 16, the first bilateral talks since the 2020 war over the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, which lies within sovereign Azerbaijan but is controlled by ethnic Armenians.

That last round of fighting, between September and November 2020, saw at least 6,500 people killed. A Russian-brokered cease-fire had the Armenian-backed government in the territory cede land to Azerbaijan.

Blinken spoke separately with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev but expressed U.S. support and assistance to help Yerevan and Baku “find a long-term comprehensive peace,” State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement. 

Blinken called on Aliyev “to release all remaining Armenian detainees.” It’s unclear how many Armenians are detained in Azerbaijan, bu the Armenian National Committee of America estimates it at around 140.

Blinken, in his call with Pashinyan, “commended” the prime minister on “positive momentum and concrete agreements” toward normalizing relations between Armenia and Turkey.

The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan is a flashpoint of greater power conflicts between Russian-backed Yerevan and Turkish-backed Baku.

There is deep-seated mistrust between Armenia and Turkey over Yerevan’s charges that Ankara has failed to take responsibility and acknowledge the Ottoman Empire’s genocide against the Armenian people in the early 20th century.

The U.S. has strategic ties with both Armenia and Azerbaijan, but a strong Armenian diaspora in the U.S. consistently pushes Congress to impose limits on American military assistance to Baku and criticizes Turkey’s support of Azerbaijan. 

The U.S., Russia and France are co-chairs of the Minsk Group, the international body charged with achieving peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The two sides have fought brutal military conflicts in the 1990s and the 2000s.

Efforts to resolve differences between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the contested territory of Nagorno-Karabakh have gained new urgency since Russia invaded Ukraine in February.

Sanders says Democrats’ prescription drug reform bill is ‘weak’Warren, Padilla call on Buttigieg to crack down on airline industry

While Russia’s invasion has dramatically reshaped global security postures in general, it has likely caused greater insecurity in Armenia, which has relied on Russian “peacekeeping” forces to help maintain the November ceasefire achieved with Azerbaijan.

Russia’s poor military performance in Ukraine and its refusal to withdraw and cease its aggression keeps Moscow’s attention away from Yerevan, with which it holds a defense pact. Pressure by the U.S. and democratic allies to condemn and isolate Russia on the global stage further weakens its position as an ally of Armenia.

—Updated at 7:20 p.m.


Armenia plans to begin production of satellites



  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Satellite production in Armenia

The Armenian government plans to launch production of space satellites in Armenia, Minister of High-Tech Industry Robert Khachatryan states.

Two months ago, the Armenian authorities announced the launch of the first Armenian satellite into space. Now the minister has added that the government has other “ambitious goals”.


  • Armenia presents its information technology adavnces at Orion summit in Yerevan
  • ‘The Future Armenian’ – an action plan to rebuild the country
  • Electric cars in Armenia and 4 reasons to drive them

Work on production has reportedly already begun. At the moment, negotiations are underway with the major partner, Spanish firm Satlantis, but the government has said it is open to “new cooperation.”

At the end of May 2022, the first Armenian satellite was sent into space through the cooperation of the Armenian state-owned CJSC Geocosmos and Satlantis.

Satlantis was founded in the USA in 2013, a year after which the head office relocated to Spain.

Armenia’s first satellite in space: PM Pashinyan, that the launch, which took place on May 25 in Cape Canaveral (USA), had been kept in secret ‘due to certain considerations’

This statement was made by the Minister of High-Tech Industry, adding:

“It is a terrestrial remote-sensing satellite.”

According to Robert Khachatryan, at this stage the country is exploring further possibilities of development:

“During the Soviet era, there were certain opportunities in Armenia [for the development of the industry]. We can say things are still possible. We have both good ideas and specialists whose knowledge can be used very effectively.”

The Minister did not specify how much money would be required to complete the project. He said only that “various models are being discussed, including the possibility of cooperation between the public and private sectors.”

Russian IT specialists are convinced that their relocation can contribute to real economic growth. Stories of Russians who moved their business to Yerevan

While not divulging details, the minister maintained that other space-related projects are in the works. He did, however, say that a second satellite would be launched in the near future.

In addition, Robert Khachatryan said that work is underway on a control center and receiving station for the first satellite. Equipment supply and specialist training have already begun, and the project should be completed by the end of the year, he said.

On May 26, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced that the first Armenian satellite had been launched into space, and that the country was entering the “era of space activities”:

“Satellite photographs will be used for monitoring the national border, preventing emergencies, managing and protecting the environment, including monitoring climate change; as well as in urban planning, road construction, geology and other areas.”

The prime minister also said that by the end of 2023, a satellite control center and a receiving station would be established.


What is the US after from Azerbaijan and Armenia? – comments from Baku




  • JAMnews
  • Baku

In a telephone conversation with Ilham Aliyev, the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken focused on Azerbaijan‘s energy ties with the European Union, also noting the importance of opening communications in the region. The head of the State Department discussed with Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan the issue of normalizing Armenia‘s relations with Turkey and Azerbaijan. According to Azerbaijani political scientist Turan Rzayev, Blinken’s calls to Aliyev and Pashinyan on the same day have attracted some attention.


  • Bombshell interview with Azerbaijani expert: “The threat of war is clear.”
  • Work for the Karabakh war participants: Armenian government program
  • “We must give the territory to Moscow, or it will turn its back on Abkhazia” — Bzhaniya

United States Secretary of State Anthony Blinken held phone conversations with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

“Yes, there have been several such calls from Blinken over the past year, but his calls to the leaders of both countries on the same day is noteworthy,” Azerbaijani political scientist Turan Rzayev said.

Meeting of Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan in Tbilisi – Yerevan and Baku continue to discuss the meeting of Mirzoyan and Bayramov

“After the 44-day war, Washington’s attention to the South Caucasus, and more precisely to Azerbaijan and Armenia, has increased dramatically. This is a significant dimension of the ongoing occupation war of Russia in Ukraine,” the expert noted.

“Different US interests in Armenia and Azerbaijan were touched upon during Blinken’s conversations with Aliyev and Pashinyan,” he added.

“For example, according to information from Yerevan, in conversation between the US Secretary of State and the Prime Minister of Armenia, issues pertaining to the regulation the relations of Armenia with Azerbaijan and Turkey were discussed.

“And in conversation with Aliyev, Blinken talked about the importance of the energy memorandum signed between Azerbaijan and the European Commission.

Azerbaijan signed a memorandum on gas export with the European Union. According to the document, Baku will double the volume of natural gas exported to Europe

“Blinken also drew attention to the need to open up transport and communication links between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and expressed his readiness to provide technical assistance in resolving this issue,” Rzayev stressed.

According to the political scientist, the United States is currently interested in normalizing relations between Armenia and Turkey in the context of providing Europe with energy from Azerbaijan.

“Washington understands that Azerbaijan is Ankara’s red line,” he said. Now the US is trying to pull Armenia out of the Kremlin’s orbit and integrate it with the West. For this, the normalization of relations between Yerevan and Ankara is of utmost importance.”

“In principle, Yerevan agrees to the normalization of relations between Armenia and Turkey. As for Turkey, it puts the ball half-way in Azerbaijan’s court. For example, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan noted in his speech the day prior that Ankara is developing relations with Armenia, and coordinating all points with Azerbaijan.

“This essentialy a reprint” – former Azerbaijani FM discussed similarities and differences of Shusha and Moscow declarations

“From the very beginning, Azerbaijan was our red line. After the resolution of the Azerbaijani issue, we said that we were opening our doors. In the process of normalizing relations with Armenia, we are pursuing a serious and confident policy,” he said.

“As is evident, Turkey traditionally adheres to the interests of Azerbaijan in this matter. But what Erdogan said about opening the doors after the resolution of the Azerbaijani issue underlines Ankara’s interest in this process,” Rzayev commented.

Rzayev noted that two points in Blinken’s telephone conversation with Aliyev were salient:

“First, the United States expressed its readiness to provide technical assistance in the opening of transport and communications links between Armenia and Azerbaijan. I think that Washington’s assistance in this matter goes only as far as normalizing relations between the countries of the South Caucasus. For the States, it is important to end the tension in the region and normalize the situation. The details of these issues, for example the opening of the Zangezur corridor, are not in Washington’s purview.

The United States feigns its interest in this issue with the _expression_ “opening transport and communication links.” In other words, the White House wants to open ties, but whether it will be in the form of a corridor or not, it doesn’t care.

Secondly, during the conversation Blinken noted the importance of the energy memorandum between Azerbaijan and the European Union. It is clear that the US and the EU intend to get rid of Russian gas imports within the next five years. So contacts with alternative sources from other countries have increased. Azerbaijan is among those.”

According to the expert, in order to increase the export of Azerbaijani gas to Europe, Washington can provide material assistance to increase the volume of gas pipelines and invest in new energy projects.

Iran may open consulate in Armenia’s Syunik prov.

Mehr News Agency
Iran –

TEHRAN, Jul. 26 (MNA) – Gevorg Parsyan, Mayor of Kapan, capital of Armenia’s southern Syunik province, said that the Islamic Republic of Iran may open a consulate in this town in the current year.

Parsyan, along with Syunik Provincial Governor Robert Ghukasyan, met with the Iranian Ambassador to Armenia Abbas Badakhshan Zohouri in April in Armenia and discussed the possibility of opening a consulate in this province.

"We have offered several places to the ambassador and the consul. It now seems those issues are being clarified. We saw a practical willingness and clarity on their part to have a consulate in Kapan," Parsyan told Hetq. "Judging by their attitude, we are talking about this year."

Armenia and Iran have embassies in the other’s country but no consulates.

In the April meeting, the Iranian ambassador reaffirmed his country's position regarding the inviolability of the internationally recognized borders of Armenia and said that all countries should respect it.

"Talk about the corridors regarding transportation links are unacceptable for us. We believe Armenia should preserve its territorial integrity,” Zohouri said at the time.

Ghukasyan and Parsyan thanked the ambassador for Iran's official position regarding “corridors”.  

MA/PR

Datablog | What shapes attitudes toward the Soviet Union’s collapse in Georgia and Armenia?




 

Photo: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media.

The collapse of the Soviet Union led to fundamental economic and social transformations in both Georgia and Armenia. Opinion polling suggests that views of the collapse today may be associated with how one has fared in the post-Soviet period. 

The 2021 Caucasus Barometer surveys in Georgia and Armenia suggest that attitudes toward the collapse of the Soviet Union are correlated with perceptions about satisfaction with life.

Overall, Georgians look back on the USSR much less fondly than Armenians do. Two-thirds (67%) of Armenians view the dissolution of the Soviet Union as ‘a bad thing’. In contrast, just 38% report the same in Georgia. About half (47%) of respondents in Georgia said that the end of the USSR was ‘a good thing’, while only 23% said the same in Armenia.

Though Georgians look back less favourably on the Soviet past, in both countries, those who see the dissolution of the USSR negatively are also more likely to have negative perceptions of life now. 

Georgian respondents who reported being less satisfied with their life were more likely to see the collapse of the Soviet Union negatively. Controlling for social and demographic variables, Georgian respondents who reported being very satisfied with their lives were 34 percentage points more likely to consider the collapse of the Soviet Union to be a good thing, compared to those who reported a very low level of satisfaction with their lives. A regression model suggests that the higher the respondent’s satisfaction with their life, the more likely they are to consider the dissolution of the Soviet Union to be a good thing.

However, this trend was not as pronounced in Armenia, where those who were more satisfied with their lives were only 10 percentage points more likely to consider the dissolution of the Soviet Union to be a good thing, compared to those who reported a lower level of satisfaction with their lives.

When asked the reasons for holding positive or negative perceptions of the Soviet Union’s dissolution, Georgians and Armenians gave the same primary explanations. 

The deterioration in people’s economic situation was mentioned by 69% of Armenian respondents and 65% of Georgian respondents who saw the end of the USSR negatively.

Among those who saw the dissolution positively, 79% of Georgians and 88% of Armenians said this was due to their countries gaining independence. 

There were no meaningful differences between those who were satisfied and dissatisfied with their jobs or who considered themselves to have relatively “poor” or “good” economic conditions in terms of whether or not they perceived the collapse of the Soviet Union to be a good thing.

Overall, the data suggests that the happier respondents are with their lives now, 30 years following the end of the Soviet Union, the more likely they are to see the collapse positively. This correlation is substantially stronger in Georgia than in Armenia. 

Note: The data in this article is available here. Analyses that do not link directly to CRRC Georgia’s online data analysis tool were conducted using logistic regression. The logistic regression included age group (18-34, 35-54, 55+), sex (male or female), education (completed secondary/lower, technical or incomplete higher education/higher), wealth (an additive index of ownership of 10 durable goods, a proxy variable), settlement type (Tbilisi, other urban areas, or rural areas), employment type (employed or not working), and level of satisfaction with life as controls. Whether or not the respondent thought the dissolution of the Soviet Union was a good or bad thing was the outcome.

The views presented in the article are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of CRRC Georgia or any related entity.