Skip to main content

First meeting of the ‘3+? format’ held in Moscow

Panorama, Armenia
Dec 10 2021

The first meeting of the so-called 3+3 regional consultative mechanism in the South Caucasus took place in Moscow on December 10, attended by deputy foreign ministers of Azerbaijan, Armenia, Russia, Turkey as well as Director General of Iran's Foreign Ministry.  

According to the statement by the Russian foreign ministry, the representatives of Georgia who had been invited to the meeting, didn't attend it. Despite the absence of Georgian side, the Russian ministry called the format '3+3'. It is noted that the representatives of participating countries expressed interest in Georgia's joining the platform and stated 'the door remains open.'

Armenia was represented at the meeting by Deputy Foreign Minister Vahe Gevorgyan. The expediency of Armenia's participation in the format has been continuously questioned by many political analysts and expert who insisted that the format serves mostly the interests of Azerbaijan and Turkey and will not consider Armenia's vital concerns. 

The 3+3 regional consultative mechanism was proposed by the presidents of Turkey and Azerbaijan, comprising Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia plus Iran, Russia and Turkey. Georgia earlier rejected the idea and refused from participation, while official Yerevan stated that the proposed regional format can not replicate the existing ones and that issues of the Nagorno Karabakh settlement as well as demarcation and delimitation between Armenia and Azerbaijan cannot be discussed within the new format.

Armenia human rights activist: Number of Armenian POWs in Azerbaijan is 80 more than the confirmed one

News.am, Armenia
Dec 10 2021

Azerbaijan has concealed the number of Armenian prisoners of war. Before the incident that took place on Nov. 16, based on confirmed data, 40 prisoners of war are held in Azerbaijan, but this is not the real number. At least another 80 are in captivity, but Azerbaijan refuses to officially state that they are captives. There is no information about their destinies to date. They are either held in captivity or killed. This is what advocate for the Armenian prisoners of war in the European Court of Human Rights Siranush Sahakyan said during today’s discussion.

She expressed regret that the officially declared number is inaccurate and says she is surprised why inaccurate numbers have been announced. “Azerbaijan also hasn’t confirmed the number of those who were captured after the Nov. 16 incident, and representatives of the Red Cross haven’t visited them in Baku. “Based on the studies of human rights activists, 32-33 servicemen were captured,” Sahakyan said, adding that the Armenian side is in an unmatched position with Azerbaijan in the sense that it is paying analytical centers and lawyers to present the reality in favor of Baku.

“In the context of application of dual standards, the International Court of The Hague rejected Armenia’s request to release the Armenian POWs held in Azerbaijan immediately. This goes to show that Armenia needs to rely on itself. Nevertheless, it is necessary to positively assess the fact that The Hague obliged Azerbaijan to ensure equality before the law and refrain from using violence. This doesn’t mean that violence is ruled out in Azerbaijan. If Azerbaijan continues to use violence against the prisoners of war under international protection and if this is documented again, there will be more international pressure to hold Azerbaijani officials, soldiers or representatives of the army liable. These actions will be interpreted as not only actions against the Armenians, but also actions against the reputation of international courts,” Sahakyan concluded.

Alen Simonyan: Armenia is in one of the most crucial stages in its history, and opposition is demanding my resignation

News.am, Armenia
Dec 10 2021

At a time when major diplomatic processes are taking place around Armenia, when gunshots are being fired in the direction of Armenia’s borders and when Armenia is in one of the most crucial stages in its history, I have received [through the system of internal document circulation in the National Assembly] a draft that the opposition has put into circulation with the demand for the resignation of the Speaker of the National Assembly. This is what Speaker of the National Assembly of Armenia Alen Simonyan wrote on his Facebook page, adding the following:

“Your act means two things — your political frailty is at its peak, and I have done everything right on my part.”

RT: US may build facilities in Georgia and Armenia to support its ‘defense activities’

News.am, Armenia
Dec 10 2021

The United States does not rule out the possibility of allocating funds for the construction of new facilities in Georgia and Armenia to support its "defense activities". This is stated in preliminary documentation published by the US Army Corps of Engineers, RT reports.

As follows from the data given in the text, the American side intends to conclude two separate contracts with companies that would be ready to take part in the design and construction of new ones, as well as in the restoration and maintenance of old facilities in Georgia and Armenia “in support of the defense activities of the United States ". 

It is specified that each of the proposed contracts "will primarily relate to the construction, design, reconstruction of buildings, repair of roads, sidewalks" and others. 

According to preliminary data, the total cost of work under the relevant agreements may amount to $ 45 million. 

Azerbaijani press: Democracy summit or how U.S. divide world into "friends" and "aliens"

By Ayya Lmahamad

The U.S. hosts "the Summit for Democracy” on December 9-10, to which 109 countries have been invited.

By what criteria the list of invitees was made is still a topical issue. The list does not include, Azerbaijan, Turkey, and other Turkic-speaking countries, the vast majority of Muslim countries, as well as China and Russia.

The fact that the U.S. did not invite such countries is a clear example of double standards and is proof that Washington is using the democracy factor for its own political purposes.

U.S. dividing world into "friends" and "aliens"

Russian military expert Igor Korotchenko has told local media that the U.S. has clearly divided the world into "friends" and "aliens".

“‘Friends’ are mostly henchmen, those who are ready to carry out any instruction of Washington. Of course, in the light of everything that is going on, Armenia’s behavior is surprising, because it is a member-state of the CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization] and has allied relations with Russia. Against this background, Armenia is taking part in an anti-Russia event,” he said.

The expert underlined that the fact that Russia, China, Azerbaijan, and several other countries were not invited to the summit, shows that those states are headed by strong, self-sufficient leaders who do not allow foreign interference in the affairs of the countries they lead.

Korotchenko noted that the Washington-hosted so-called democracy summit is an anti-Russian event that is held under the auspices of the U.S.

The expert stated that the post-Soviet countries invited there were states where the norms of democracy are not only not respected, but also suppressed.

“The invitation of Armenia is a good example. As for democracy in Armenia a year ago we saw that a crowd of people in Yerevan dragged [former] Armenian Parliament Speaker Ararat Mirzoyan out of a car and beat him. Apparently, these standards of democracy today contribute to inviting Armenia and allowing it to participate in this summit,” he said.

Korotchenko also recalled the constant clashes among Armenian MPs, in which it is common practice to throw mineral water glass bottles or kick each other. He stressed the question of how can a country, where the prime minister was hiding from the crowd of people in an underground bunker under the Defence Ministry building, be invited to such a summit.

“But they are invited since Yerevan has the largest U.S. embassy, non-profit organizations sponsored by the State Department and numerous American foundations operate in Yerevan. [Prime Minister Nikol] Pashinyan and his team are Soros' representatives,” he said.

“Therefore, everything is obvious. This clearly demonstrates the cynicism of Washington, which diligently classifies a number of countries, while stubbornly ignoring the problems with democracy among its accomplices,” he added.

"Summit of Washington vassals"

Political scientist Anton Bredikhin said that the democracy summit is in fact a summit of vassals – Washington's vassals, which are either within the U.S. sphere of influence or interested in it.

He noted that Armenia, invited to the summit, seeks to pursue a Western-oriented policy.

“And of course, after the U.S. invited Yerevan to attend the summit, Pashinyan, seeing in this platform another opportunity to review the results of the Karabakh war, the decisions adopted in Moscow and Sochi, will seek to convey his position in the meeting, because he needs the U.S. and France to join the process, and for further decisions to be made solely in Armenia's interest,” he said.

Bredikhin stressed that the summit is not so much deliberative in nature. He considered it to be rather in the nature of the fulfillment of the U.S.wishes.

"The Americans will present a number of their requirements, which will have to be fulfilled by all the participants of the forum. Both the deadlines within which these requirements must be met and the areas in which they must be implemented by each of the parties will be presented,” he said.

The political scientist believes that Biden will make a number of statements that the new sanctions are needed against Russia and that each of the countries participating in this summit will be the party either proposing these sanctions or the party that will support these sanctions.

"So we are waiting for another batch of Western sanctions on Russia… Of course, at the end of the summit, Biden will announce that he can now rule the half-world. This half-world includes the invited countries, regardless of their regime or religious component, and now they will be obliged to fulfill all the wishes that will come from the White House," he said.

No credibility

Former US ambassador Matthew Bryza said that it is difficult for the U.S. to have credibility in claiming to be a global leader on democracy when they themselves have faced a serious challenge to their own democratic system. He added that it is not a good time for the U.S., in terms of its reputation, to hold a democracy summit.

“Because to do so, the U.S. government needs to decide which democracies are good ones and which are bad ones that don’t deserve to be invited,” he said.

Bryza stressed that given the threats facing democracy in the U.S., most notably, the insurrections, riots against the U.S. Capitol on January 8, it is not a time when the U.S. has great credibility as a leader of democracy.

“In fact, we still have one of the two major political parties in the U.S. falsely claiming that the last election was stolen from Donald Trump when it is absolutely clear that it is not the case,” he said.

 The selective choice of countries invited to the so-called democracy summit, clearly shows that it has been drawn up from the U.S. geopolitical interests and that America is fundamentally distorting the concept of democracy.

Azerbaijani press: US Summit for Democracy as example of ‘divide and rule’ policy

By Trend

The Summit for Democracy has kicked off in the US today.

Proceeding from the list of the countries invited and not invited to this summit, it is clear that this list was drawn up not in accordance with the criteria of democracy, but from the point of view of the US global, geopolitical interests.

Congo, Iraq and Armenia were invited to the summit. Turkey, Hungary and Azerbaijan did not participate in the event. In this case, the question arises. What criteria determine who has been invited?

US expert Peter Tase has commented on this issue.

“President Biden's Summit for Democracy is doomed to fail, US expert Peter Tase told Trend.

Tase added that double standards are the main pillar in the Biden Foreign Policy.

“The Summit for Democracy is simply a show off, empty rhetoric and will not bolster human rights, it will further weaken institutional democracy globally,” the expert said.

According to the expert, President Biden has stated that "Democracy doesn’t happen by accident. We have to defend it, fight for it, strengthen it, renew it".

“In the real world, the United States is defending the antithesis,” Tase said. “President Biden's Summit for Democracy is doomed to fail and will not strengthen the democratic standards within the countries that were invited to participate in this marginal event that is characterized by double standards and attended by ruthless autocrats and criminals.”

Tase said that refusing to talk, unwilling to officially invite, and hold discussions with the Republic of Turkey, Republic of Azerbaijan, People's Republic of Bangladesh, and other democratic governments; is a recipe to self isolationism that is definitely harmful to the United States national interests.

“I am disheartened and deeply disturbed by the list of statesmen invited by President Biden to attend this major event that favors autocracy over transparent governments, and will certainly result in a total failure,” the expert said.

In turn, Director of the Russian Institute for Political Studies, Russian analyst Sergei Markov also commented on this issue.

“The fact that Russia, Turkey, China, Hungary, Azerbaijan were not invited to the Summit for Democracy shows that these countries are sovereign and are ready to defend their interests, rather than obey Washington’s orders,” Markov said.

Markov added that the Summit for Democracy is an event in which the countries, recognizing that they are subordinate to the US and follow Washington's instructions, are taking part, rather than democratic countries.

The director of the Russian Institute for Political Studies also stressed that it is important for Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to participate in this summit because he wants to pass from Russia to the US.

While speaking about the Summit for Democracy, the Russian political analyst stressed that there is an obvious substitution of the principle of democracy for the principles of subordination to Washington.

“When this substitution occurs, the calls for democracy are destroyed,” the analyst said. “Nobody will believe the calls for democracy that are heard from the forum in which Armenia participates.”

“We can observe the substitution of good standards for bad ones,” Markov added. “Democracy is a good standard, while the idea that everybody must obey Washington’s orders is a bad standard.”

The Summit for Democracy is a great irony as its goal is simply to oust other countries, divide the world into different camps. This is a kind of ‘divide and rule’ policy.

Amid the process of inviting Armenia to the summit, which supports terrorism at the state level, Hungary, Azerbaijan and Turkey, which are pursuing an unquestioning policy, have not been invited, which gives a clear idea of the criteria by which the participants were selected.

Asbarez: Talks on Ankara-Proposed ‘3+3’ Scheme Held in Moscow

Armenia's Deputy Foreign Minister Vahe Gevorgyan

The deputy foreign ministers of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Turkey and Iran met in Moscow on Friday for the first round of talks around the dangerous Ankara-proposed “3+3” scheme, which is backed by Baku and envisions the creation of regional bloc. Georgia, whose participation was anticipated for the success of the scheme, has rejected the plan.

“Prospects for the development of multilateral regional cooperation were discussed during the meeting. An agreement was reached to focus the work of the platform on the practical issues that are of interest to all its participants,” Russia’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

“These include confidence-building measures, cooperation in the trade, economic, transport, cultural and humanitarian spheres, and response to common challenges and threats,” added the statement, which emphasized that the “representatives of the five countries expressed interest for Georgia to join the platform, for which the door remain open.”

Armenia was represented at the talks by Deputy Foreign Minister Vahe Gevorgyan, who, according to a press statement, reaffirmed Armenia’s position that the agenda of regional consultations should aim to form a mutually beneficial agenda for regional cooperation, and not replicate the activities of other international platforms, including those with conflict resolution mandates, such as the OSCE Minsk Group.

“An agreement was reached to continue the consultations based on the respect of the rights of all countries in the region,” Gevorgyan said.

On 30th Anniversary of Referendum Artsakh Calls for International Recognition of its Independence

Celebrating Artsakh's Independence

The referendum on independence is a solid legal basis for Artsakh’s statehood, created to save the people of Artsakh from the threat of complete annihilation, Artsakh’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement on the 30th Anniversary of the Referendum on Independence, which was held on December 10, 1991.

“Strengthening the state of Artsakh and achieving its international recognition are an absolute priority for the authorities and people of Artsakh, since having a national state with a status of an international legal subject is the key condition and means of preserving and developing the people,” the Ministry said.

“The struggle of the people of Artsakh for their independent statehood is a struggle for freedom, fundamental rights and peace, as well as a safe and dignified future,” added the Artsakh foreign ministry.

Below is the full text of the statement:

30 years ago, on December 10, 1991, a nationwide referendum on the political future of Artsakh was held in the Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno Karabakh Republic), as a result of which the overwhelming majority of the voters (99.89%) voted for independence. The referendum was held in full compliance with the then national legislation in force, democratic procedures and norms of international law. All the necessary conditions were created for holding a referendum on the entire territory of the Republic. Eighty two percent of the citizens eligible to vote took part in the voting.

The preparation and holding of the referendum took place against the backdrop of a purposefully pursued policy by Azerbaijan to escalate tensions, which became explosive and subsequently turned into a full-scale war against Artsakh and its people.

The referendum on independence in Artsakh was another attempt by the Artsakh side to prevent the impending war and to transfer the resolution of the Azerbaijan-Karabakh conflict to the legal and political field. However, Azerbaijan ignored the steps taken by Artsakh to resolve the conflict by peaceful and democratic means and on the election day subjected Stepanakert, the capital of the Republic, tօ massive artillery shelling, as a result of which dozens of civilians were killed and injured.

The people of Artsakh have repeatedly reaffirmed their determination to strengthen and develop the sovereign statehood at subsequent constitutional referenda. On December 10, 2006, the first Constitution of the country was adopted in Artsakh at a national referendum. On February 20, 2017, the people of Artsakh voted for the new Constitution at a regular referendum, thus confirming their previous decisions and will, to continue the path of building an independent state.

Unfortunately, the expressions of the will of the people of Artsakh and their democratic aspirations became a missed opportunity for the international community, which, if recognized, could have prevented the wars unleashed by Azerbaijan against our country and saved thousands of innocent lives.

Azerbaijan was the initiator of three wars unleashed with the aim of destroying Artsakh in 1991-94, 2016 and 2020. In the interwar years it deliberately and consistently undermined the peacekeeping efforts of international mediators by taking an extremely uncompromising and destructive position on all issues during the negotiations. The continuation of this aggressive policy has been Baku’s refusal to conduct substantive negotiations after the 44-day war in 2020 in order to exclude the possibility of achieving a comprehensive settlement of the conflict. The evolution of the proposals of the international mediators demonstrates their understanding of the impossibility of Artsakh’s being part of Azerbaijan and recognition of the key role of the people of Artsakh in determining their political status. In particular, by refusing to negotiate, Baku, contrary to the efforts and proposals of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, is trying to impose the results of the illegal use of force as a fait accompli.

We emphasize once again that recognition of the inalienable right to self-determination realized by the people of Artsakh is the only way to put an end to the Azerbaijan-Karabakh conflict and to create conditions for eliminating its consequences, including liberation of all the occupied territories, and finding a long-term, fair and sustainable solution to the problem of refugees and other remaining issues.

The referendum on independence is a solid legal basis for the statehood of Artsakh, created with the aim of saving the people of Artsakh from the threat of complete annihilation, which emanated and continues to emanate from the militant policy of Azerbaijan, where the hatred against Armenians and genocidal ideology are the basis of state-building.

Strengthening the state of Artsakh and achieving its international recognition are an absolute priority for the authorities and people of Artsakh, since having a national state with a status of an international legal subject is the key condition and means of preserving and developing the people. The struggle of the people of Artsakh for their independent statehood is a struggle for freedom, fundamental rights and peace, as well as a safe and dignified future.

Asbarez: Editorial: Artsakh’s Independence Must Not be Compromised and Must be Recognized

On December 10, 1991 a referendum cemented Artsakh's independence

December 10 marks the 30th anniversary of the referendum on Artsakh’s independence. In 1991, some three months after Artsakh declared independence from the Soviet Union, 99.89 percent of the population voted to make Artsakh an independent republic.

After seven decades under Soviet rule, this became one of the first expressions of the people’s will, defying Communist tenets and exercising their inalienable right to self-determination.

The concept of self-determination has been at the core of mediation efforts for the settlement of the Karabakh conflict and the latest push for the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs to become engaged in addressing Artsakh’s status hinges on this.

After last year’s aggressive attack on Artsakh, Azerbaijan and Turkey have been advancing the notion that Artsakh, as an independent republic, does not exist. The two countries are pouring millions of dollars on infrastructure improvements, building roads, tunnels, airports, while at the same time erasing Artsakh’s Armenian heritage and identity.

So, it was beyond egregious for Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to tell parliament on Wednesday that Artsakh’s final status may not include independence.

“The final status of Nagorno-Karabakh does not definitely imply its independence,” Pashinyan told lawmakers, saying that a referendum on Artsakh’s status was not discussed during post-war negotiations.

This is a dangerous statement coming from Armenia’s leader who is the one tasked with defending the interests of not only Armenia but also Artsakh in negotiations. Pashinyan can continue to point fingers in his ridiculous effort to shrug off blame for the humiliating defeat, but what he can’t—and must not be allowed to—do trample upon the will of the people so definitively expressed on December 10, 1991.

If Pashinyan and his government have given up on Artsakh’s independence, the people of Artsakh and the entire Armenian Nation must collectively fight to protect, at all costs, the will of the people of Artsakh.

The fact of the matter is that a referendum was already held on December 10, 1991 and the overwhelming majority of the people chose independence. This vote cannot be stolen from the people, especially since our sisters and brother spilled blood to defend it.

The November 9, 2020 agreement that ended the military actions in Artsakh and stipulated the surrender of territories to Azerbaijan cannot be viewed as an effort to override Artsakh’s independence. Hence, engaging in negotiations, such as the “3+3” scheme proposed by Ankara and hailed by Baku, pose direct threats to Artsakh’s independence.

The United States and Europe have signaled that the status of Karabakh remains unresolved, thus signaling the conflict has not ended, directly opposing the position taken by Baku and Ankara. Moscow, on the other hand, is tacitly pushing for the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen’s engagement in the process and, on many occasions, and has flip-flopped on the issue of status.

If the U.S. and Europe allow the status talks to veer from the concept of cementing people’s right to self-determination and independence, then they would be betraying their own commitments to upholding democracy and democratic norms and principles. This message should be sent loudly to lawmakers in the U.S. and across Europe and become a rallying call for all Armenians to demand international recognition of Artsakh.

Furthermore, based on Artsakh’s _expression_ for independence 30 years ago, any discussions on its status must ensure that Artsakh does not fall under Azerbaijani rule.

The independence of the Republic of Artsakh cannot be compromised. Any effort to that end will set a dangerous precedent that the will of the people can be trampled upon the whims of political actors seeking to expand their personal and other interests and agendas.

The way that Armenians rallied together last year during the war showed the Armenian Nation’s ability to stand together in defense of the homeland. Preserving and strengthening Artsakh’s independence and statehood must become a priority for all Armenians.

Armenpress: Ararat Mirzoyan, Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne sign “Armenian-French economic cooperation roadmap”

Ararat Mirzoyan, Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne sign “Armenian-French economic cooperation roadmap”

Save

Share

 20:18, 9 December, 2021

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 9, ARMENPRESS. The first joint sitting of the Armenian-French economic cooperation working group took place on December 9 in Paris. The Armenian delegation was headed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan, the French delegation was headed by the Secretary of State of Foreign Affairs of France Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne. The Armenian delegation also included the Deputy Ministers of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure, Economy, Finance, High-Tech Industry, Advisor to the Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and other officials.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the MFA Armenia, Minister Mirzoyan thanked Secretary of State Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne for the warm reception and contributing to the organization of the effective discussions, emphasizing that the session is the result of the nearly one year of mutual consistent work and the efforts and agreements at the top level of the two countries.

Ararat Mirzoyan stressed that it is necessary to carry out purposeful work to implement the agreements reached by the top leadership of the two countries aimed at the intensification of economic relations, which will correspond to the level of privileged relations between Armenia and France.

During the discussions, the sides highlighted the diversification of the Armenian-French trade and economic relations, the need to enrich the cooperation with new economic programs, and the activation of mutual investments. The interlocutors also noted the need to intensify contacts between the business circles of France and Armenia, in particular, through mutual visits of delegations and organization of economic events. The current activity of the French Development Agency in Armenia was emphasized, the implementation of new programs was highlighted.

Within the framework of the sitting, Foreign Minister of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan and the French Secretary of State Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne signed the "Armenian-French Economic Cooperation Roadmap for 2021-2026”. The main goal of the document is to create a strategy and framework for bilateral economic programs between Armenia and France for the next five years, which will include infrastructure, urban development, energy, agriculture, tourism, innovation, high technology, healthcare and other promising areas.