Google To Launch New Tool

GOOGLE TO LAUNCH NEW TOOL

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
22.06.2009 17:26 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Google is currently performing internal testing
on a neat new tool called Flipper, which attempts to make the Google
News interface more like paging through a series of magazine clippings.

As reported over on TechCrunch, everyone’s favorite data warehouse
and advertising broker has revealed a screenshot of Flipper, a new
interface to Google News which is due for launch in the Labs. You can
not only browse by sections, but also by sources, keywords, and most
importantly by elements such as "most popular" and "recommended."

Armenian Branch Of VTB Awarded Diploma For Successful Brand Promotio

ARMENIAN BRANCH OF VTB AWARDED DIPLOMA FOR SUCCESSFUL BRAND PROMOTION

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
23.06.2009 15:25 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Bank VTB (Armenia) CJSC was awarded a Diploma by
the parent Bank VTB "For high awareness of the VTB brand in the local
market", press office of VTB reports.

Armenian branch of VTB bank was awarded in the POWER-Brand nomination
for considerable achievements over 2007-2008 in promotion of bank’s
brand. Diploma and souvenir were handed to representatives of the
bank on June 19, 2009.

Ahmadinejad re-elected: Israel and Obama’s Iran puzzle

Ahmadinejad re-elected: Israel and Obama’s Iran puzzle
By Ramzy Baroud
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Jun 22, 2009, 00:17

The election victory of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is
likely to complicate US President Barack Obama’s new approach to his
country’s conflict with Iran. The reason behind the foreseen obstacle
is neither the US nor Iran’s refusal to engage in future dialogue but
rather Israel’s insistence on a hard-line approach to the problem.
Iran’s presidential elections on June 12 were positioned to represent
another fight between Middle Eastern `moderates’ vs. `extremists.’
That depiction, which conveniently divided the Middle East —
according to the prevailing US foreign policy discourse — to
pro-American and anti-American camps was hardly as clear in the
Iranian case as it was in Palestine and most recently in Lebanon.
Ahmadinejad’s main rival, Mir Hussein Moussavi served as Iran’s prime
minister for eight years (between 1981-1989), during one of Iran’s
most challenging times, its war with Iraq. He was hardly seen as a
`moderate’ then. More, Moussavi was equally adamant in his country’s
right to produce atomic energy for peaceful means. As far as US
interests in the region are concerned, both Ahmadinejad and Moussavi
are interested in dialogue with the US, and are unlikely to alter
their country’s attitudes towards the occupation of Iraq, their
support of Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Palestine. Neither is
ready, willing or, frankly, capable of removing Iran from the regional
power play at work in the Middle East, considering that Iranian
policies are shaped by other internal forces beside the president of
the country.
This is not to suggest that both leaders are one and the same. For the
average Iranian, statements made by Ahmadinejad and Moussavi during
Iran’s lively election campaigns did indeed promise major changes in
their lives, daily struggles and future. But yet again, the two men
were caricatured to present two convenient personaliti
`wiping Israel off the map,’ and a soft-spoken, learned `moderate’
ready to `engage’ the West and redeem the sins of his predecessor.
Unfortunately for the Obama administration, the first negative image
— tainted as such by mainstream media, and years of image
manipulation by forces dedicated to the interest of Israel — won. The
election outcome in Iran presents the young Obama with a major
challenge: if he carries on with his diplomatic approach and soft
overtures towards Iran, ruled by a supposed Holocaust-denier, he will
certainly be seen as a failed president, who dared to perceive
Israel’s interests in the region as secondary; on the other hand,
Obama cannot depart from his country’s new approach towards Iran, a
key player in shaping the contending forces in the entire region.
In some way, Ahmadinejad’s victory was the best news for Israel. Now,
Tel Aviv will continue to pressure Obama to `act’ against Iran, for
the latter, under its current president is an `existential threat’ to
Israel, a claim that few in Washington question. `It is not like we
rooted for Ahmadinejad,’ an Israeli official told the New York Times
on the condition of anonymity a day after it was clear that
Ahmadinejad won another term in office.
But considering Israel’s immediate attempt to capitalize on the
outcome of the elections makes one wonder if the defeat of Iran’s
`moderate’ camp was not a best case scenario for Israel. Iran will
continue to be presented as the obstacle in future peace in the Middle
East, allowing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to avoid any
accountability as far as the `peace process’ is concerned. In fact,
with an `existential threat’ not too far away, few in Washington would
dare challenge Israel’s settlement policies in the occupied West Bank
and East Jerusalem, or its deadly siege on Gaza, or in fact its
confrontational approach to Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon, the latter
seen as an `Iranian-backed militia.’
Israeli Vice Prime Minister Silvan Sh
s in Israel to exploit the moment on June 13. The results of Iran’s
elections, he said, `blow up in the faces of those who thought Iran
was built for a genuine dialogue with the free world on stopping its
nuclear program.’ Ostensibly, Shalom’s message was directed at a small
audience in Tel Aviv, but his true target audience, was in fact Obama
himself.
Obama’s overtures towards Iran were not necessarily an indication of a
fundamental shift in US foreign policy, but a realistic recognition of
Iran’s growing influence in the region, and the US’ desperate and
failing fight in Iraq. It was Obama’s pragmatism, not a moral shift in
US foreign policy that compelled such statements as that made on June
2 in a BBC interview: `What I do believe is that Iran has legitimate
energy concerns, legitimate aspirations. On the other hand, the
international community has a very real interest in preventing a
nuclear arms race in the region.’
For Israel, however, Obama’s rhetoric is a deviation from the past US
hard-line approach towards Iran. What Israel wants to keep alive is a
discussion of war as a viable option to rein in Iran’s nuclear
ambitions and to eliminate a major military rival in the Middle East.
Senior fellow at the pro-Israeli American Enterprise Institute John
R. Bolton expressed the war-mongering mantra of the pro-Israel crowd
in a recent article in the Wall Street Journal entitled: `What if
Israel Strikes Iran?’: `Many argue that Israeli military action will
cause Iranians to rally in support of the mullahs’ regime and plunge
the region into political chaos. To the contrary, a strike accompanied
by effective public diplomacy could well turn Iran’s diverse
population against an oppressive regime.’
Ahmadinejad’s victory will serve as further proof that diplomacy with
Iran is not an option from the point of view of Israel and its
supporters in the US. Whether Obama will proceed with his positive
rhetoric towards Iran is to be seen. Failure to do so, however, will
further undermine s country’s interests in the Middle East, and will
prolong the cold war atmosphere of animosity, espoused by a clique of
neoconservative hard-liners throughout the Bush administration of past
years.Ramzy Baroudis an author and editor of
PalestineChronicle.com. His work has been published in many newspapers
and journals worldwide. His latest book is The Second Palestinian
Intifada: A Chronicle of a People’s Struggle (Pluto Press, London,)
and his forthcoming book is, `My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza
The Untold Story’ (Pluto Press, London).

Communications Play Important Role In Settling Differences

COMMUNICATIONS PLAY IMPORTANT ROLE IN SETTLING DIFFERENCES

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
22.06.2009 12:23 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ International conference "Armenia at the crossroads
of communications" launched in Armenia. The conference is attended
by experts and politicians from Russia, Turkey, Georgia. Iran’s
delegation does not participate in the conference due to a strained
internal political situation in the country.

"Communications play important role in our complex region, however
our region is attractive in respect to investments and cooperation,"
Shavarsh Kocharyan, RA deputy minister of foreign affairs said
opening the conference. According to him, energy projects are of main
priority. "Currently, attempts to isolate Armenia from such regional
projects are undertaken, but even in the case of isolation Armenia
is able to export electric energy to neighbor countries. All this
is possible thanks to cooperation with Russia and implementation of
projects with Iran," Mr. Kocharyan stressed.

Communications play an important role in ironing out the differences,
although they can also cause differences, Shavarsh Kocharyan said.

ANTELIAS: HH Aram I will address the G8 Summit 2009 in Rome

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

HIS HOLINESS ARAM I WILL ADDRESS THE G8 SUMMIT 2009,
DURING A PREPARATORY MEETING IN ROME

Italy will host the G8 Summit of the world’s major industrialized nations
consisting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and
the United States. The G8 was established in 1975 as an informal forum for
Heads of Governments to discuss mutual or global concerns. Some of the
topics discussed by ministers are: health, economic and social development,
environment, foreign affairs, and justice.

This Summit in Italy is crucial because of the challenges posed by the
global economic crisis. On this occasion, the Italian Government, in
cooperation with the Roman Catholic Church have invited a small group of
religious leaders representing the major world religions to address the
agenda of the Summit.

His Holiness Aram I will be the only religious leader from the Middle East
and will speak during the opening session. The topic of his presentation
will be "The Role of Religion in addressing the current economic crisis and
its repercussions on people and the earth."

##
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the history and
the mission of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of
the Catholicosate, The Cilician
Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is located in
Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org/
http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org

ANKARA: Caught Red-Handed

CAUGHT RED-HANDED
EKREM DUMANLI

Today’s Zaman
June 15 2009
Turkey

There is no need for hemming and hawing. This is simply a situation
of being caught red-handed. This is exactly what happened, when those
preparing the conspiracy of the era were at work, the lights turned
on and their shadowy plans came to the surface.

The Taraf daily reported a historic piece of news on Friday when
it published a document which contains the Turkish Armed Forces’
(TSK) plot to discredit the ruling Justice and Development Party
(AK Party) and the Gulen movement, inspired by respected Islamic
scholar Fethullah Gulen.

What did Taraf’s headline of the lead story say? It said exactly
the following: "The plot to finish off the AK Party and Gulen
movement." You cannot imagine what the document the Taraf daily
published contained! "Agents who were placed in the AK Party will
be mobilized, enabling the discovery of weapons, ammunition and
documents at addresses of Gulen’s followers as if they were members
of a terrorist organization." The Gulen movement will be presented
as having a link to the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and a
propaganda campaign will be launched to show Gulen followers as having
relations with institutions such as the CIA and Mossad. Officers who
are suspects in the ongoing trial into Ergenekon, a clandestine crime
network which has alleged links within the state, will be defended
and the media will be mobilized to this effect. News stories will be
prepared about Greece and Armenia that will create reactions among
the people and that will help expand the voter base of nationalist
parties. …"

This is unbelievable!

The sole explanation coming from the General Staff is a statement
released halfheartedly about the launch of an investigation into the
document. Unfortunately, the General Staff fails to meet the public’s
expectations for a full-fledged investigation on such issues. It does
not deal with the essence of the charges or unfortunately leads to
the formation of such an environment because it does not react to
the content of the documents as much as it gets angry over those who
leaked such documents. One should investigate those who leaked those
documents, but one should first investigate the charges. Who dares
prepare a document showing the TSK as a crime organization? First,
the General Staff should give an account of this (or investigate it)
so that everyone can understand the investigation of those leaking
these documents. Then people may naturally ask the General Staff
whether it is flawless regarding this issue.

The name of Col. Dursun Cicek is under the TSK’s "Action Plan to
Fight against Reactionaryism." As we learned from the media, Cicek is
commissioned in the Operations Command 3rd Support Unit, which replaced
the Psychological Warfare Department. This means this plot was prepared
in the center of the General Staff. Moreover, the document is dated
April 2009, meaning it is very new. It was possible for the General
Staff to deny the existence of this document at first. It is obvious
who prepared it and when it was prepared. But the short and ambiguous
explanations made by the General Staff raised suspicions further. The
fact that some media outlets immediately began to defend the General
Staff in the wake of the disclosure of the action plan does not cover
the scandalous picture.

A more terrible situation is in question than the situation regarding
the coup diaries of a former general, which showed the preparations
of some generals to stage a military coup in 2004. Chief of General
Staff Gen. İlker BaÅ~_bug dwelled on the importance of democracy
and supremacy of law in all the speeches he delivered, so he raised
the people’s expectations from the General Staff to respect these
values. What he does now with his staff that was caught red-handed will
set an example. Things such as whether he will remove the colonel in
question from his post "for the safety of the investigation" or whether
he had knowledge about the document are being debated and will continue
to be debated more. The General Staff failed to label the document
prepared two months ago as "fake." After this silence and hesitation,
the things it says no longer have any value. How unfortunate!

In every one of his speeches, the chief of General Staff talks about
democracy and the importance of remaining within the boundaries of
law. I wonder whether some busybodies understood "remaining within
the boundaries of law" as first inventing a crime, creating a criminal
and trying civilians through military courts. I wonder whether this is
the new way to fight against reactionaryism. There is no need to say
more; this is called creating a conspiracy, slander and has nothing
to do with remaining within the boundaries of law. With which reason,
conscience and mind can it be explained for those who keep in mind the
"presumption of innocence" when it comes to the Ergenekon suspects
who were caught with their weapons, maps, action plans and bombs to
invent crimes for innocent people and transfer them to military courts?

Did the police plant the document?

Those caught red-handed are not only wannabe coup plotters and
conspirers that have infiltrated our military. In this incident, some
media institutions have also been caught red-handed. Take newspapers
from June 13 and you’ll understand what I’m saying very clearly. A team
plotting a coup that infiltrated the military is conspiring against the
government and the nation, and only four newspapers are carrying this
to their headlines. Is this your understanding of democracy? Is this
your media responsibility? Is this your journalists’ reflex in action?

Worse, a military court tried to issue a ban on broadcasting
the accusations. If the General Staff had not issued a statement
announcing that it is starting an investigation, readers of some
newspapers would go on with their lives without any knowledge of
the conspiracy of the century. Particularly, two newspapers whose
names I will have to mention or else I will have done a wrong to
future researchers studying media history in Turkey, have acted
this way openly. One is Posta. It is OK for a newspaper to market
itself as "cheap," or "easy" or to even appear "cute" to some of its
readers. But such irresponsibility is detachment from journalism,
nothing else. Look at the headline they chose for the said news story:
"Investigation into and Broadcasting Ban on Plan to End Religious
Fundamentalism." This was the headline? As if there was a "plan to
end religious fundamentalism" and an investigation was started into
that. I don’t think this was worthy of Posta.

Even Haberturk, a daily which likes to challenge others by saying it
has more courage to publish certain news stories than others, chose
not to include any information about the Action Plan for Fighting
Religious Fundamentalism. Normally we would expect them to show the
courage and independence they have shown in energy issues. It is a
confounding situation!

The most perplexing situation, however, is, unfortunately, that of the
Vatan daily. Using the subheading "Strange things are transpiring,"
the daily took a whole new approach by completely twisting the
subject. So what is it? Fethullah Gulen said on April 8 that "they
will present Muslims as terrorists." And so what? What happens if
he said that? They try to appear as if they are implying something
using the curiousness inherent to journalism. If you are a journalist,
you first have to talk about the document at hand; only then can you
express things indirectly. Was it Mr. Gulen who told a colonel working
as the commander of the operations command to create such a ridiculous
document? Who and with what kind of audacity can put together such an
action plan? It is really not difficult to attach meaning to Gulen’s
words. For in the past few years some armed organizations have been
guising their units as "IÅ~_ık houses," keep Gulen’s books in those
houses and this situation has been most disturbing to both Gulen and
those who love him. This is not a secret. This has been written about
many times. It is also known that some organizations known to have
suspicious relationships have been attempting to appear close to the
Gulen movement, which is disturbed by these tactics. This being the
case, is it right for a journalist to blame the victim? Is it OK for
a human being to do that?

Yesterday’s Milliyet daily also slightly leaned toward Vatan’s tactics
and tried to raise question marks. What did it say? "It was trying
to raise suspicion of whether it could be the police that planted
the action plan in the suspect’s office." Luckily, yesterday’s issue
of Star wrote down the process of how the action plan was seized,
second by second, effectively refuting the argument that the police
might have planted this document. According to the story in Star,
the police and the lawyer of the Ergenekon suspect whose office was
being searched entered the office at the same time, and every second
of the search was recorded on video. This being the case, what is
resorting to the claim that "the police planted it" but trying to
water down the case? What’s more, it goes without saying that after
this point those who claim that the action plan was fake will have
to confront scientific methods to prove their claim.

Here is the gist of it: It is important not to hurt the reputation of
our military, no doubt about it. However, apparently, a group within
the TSK is still trying social engineering via illegal means. If
some people have stepped the boundaries of their legal duties and
attempted to conspire against the government, the average citizen
and even against television series, this means that everyone has a
duty. Politicians cannot get rid of this by staying silent. The TSK
cannot overcome this incident just by investigating the source of
the leak. The media cannot save themselves from being collaborators
of propaganda by only producing conspiracy theories. The judiciary
cannot simply overlook various crimes from "trying to overthrow
the government" to slander because there is an obvious crime out
there. What’s more, those who were caught red-handed are simply
standing there in front of our eyes.

"Gohar" Musical Ensemble To Give Concert In Aleppo’s Historical Cast

"GOHAR" MUSICAL ENSEMBLE TO GIVE CONCERT IN ALEPPO’S HISTORICAL CASTLE

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
15.06.2009 18:01 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On June 16 and 17, "Gohar" musical ensemble will
give a concert in the historical castle of Aleppo, Syria. The concert
will be take place in the amphitheatre of the castle.

"Gohar" consists of 150 performers and musicians, as well as 15 solo
singers and 12 female dancers.

The ensemble has released its first DVD which includes Armenian
language texts of the songs. There is also transcription in Latin
letters for those who are not familiar with Armenian scripts.

U.S. Embassy Appealed To The Prosecutor’s Office

U.S. EMBASSY APPEALED TO THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE

A1+
04:37 pm | June 15, 2009 | Politics

Although the Yerevan municipal election is already a past event and
Gagik Beglaryan has sworn in as Yerevan Mayor, people still protest
against the election results.

The Armenian National Congress (HAK) has appealed to the
Prosecutor-General’s Office, Sona Truzian, Spokesperson for the RoA
Prosecutor, informed A1+.

The Office has received complaints from the Congress, proxies and
observers.

Complaints refer to different phenomena – starting from vote stuffing
to the closed Territorial Election Commissions.

Actions have been brought on some complaints.

A1+ has been able to find out that written-complaints were submitted by
the U.S. Embassy and "Election is yours" Organization which conducted
an observation mission and registered cases of election fraud.

Turkey To Discuss Nagorno Karabakh Issue In UN

TURKEY TO DISCUSS NAGORNO KARABAKH ISSUE IN UN

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
15.06.2009 13:17 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkey advocates discussion of all urgent topics,
including Nagorno Karabakh at UN Security Council sitting in June,
Ahmet Davutoðlu , foreign minister of Turkey said.

"We would like Armenian-Azeri negotiations be fruitful. We work
towards this in the framework of Minsk Group of OSCE. During my visit
to Washington I discussed that topic with the US administration,
we came to the conclusion, that our joint task is to support in every
possible way the settlement of that conflict, Ahmet Davutoðlu stressed,
Trend News reports.

On June 18 Turkey’s foreign minister will take part in the sitting
of the UN Security Council.

Turkey has become non-permanent member of the UN Security Council
since spring this year for a two-year term.

Ukraine’s Dangerous Game; Yulia Tymoshenko talks with FP about West

Ukraine’s Dangerous Game

Yulia Tymoshenko talks with FP about engaging the West, placating
Russia, and trying to keep her country in one piece

Foreign Policy (Washington, DC)
Posted April 2009 / Web Exclusive

By Federico Fubini

As Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko rushes out of her Kiev
office to greet me, her tight handshake and tense smile make it clear
that she didn’t get to be the most powerful woman east of Berlin by
being a soft character.

This is a tough day for her and an important time for Ukraine. Later
she will speak before parliament to defend controversial new budget
measures demanded by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in exchange
for unblocking a badly needed financial rescue package. The amount at
stake is relatively small, a $1.8 billion second installment of a
$16.4 billion loan. But without the IMF, there is little hope Ukraine
will regain enough market confidence to roll over the $40 billion in
bank loans and bonds coming due this year. By mid-April, Tymoshenko
needs to push pension reform and higher gas tariffs through the
legislature – hardly a comfortable position for a leading candidate in
the presidential elections expected on Oct. 25.

The 2005 Orange Revolution made Tymoshenko an international media
icon. With her fiery rhetoric and political savvy – not to mention her
stunning looks and famously distinctive braids – she seemed destined
to be the face of the post-Soviet world’s new wave of democratic
revolution.

Four years later, it’s not so easy to be Yulia Tymoshenko. The adoring
crowds in Independence Square are a distant memory. She feels under
fire from all corners, most of all from her former Orange Revolution
ally, President Viktor Yushchenko. She was late for our coffee
conversation because she first needed to focus on this morning’s
attacks from the president, who accused her in parliament of running
the economy into the ground. She is careful to avoid any explicit
reference to him, but notes "I am not here to please everybody." In
attempting to manage Ukraine out of a crisis while attending to both
her country’s desire to rejoin Europe and its fear of an increasingly
expansionist Russia, it’s becoming more and more difficult to please
anybody.

The global recession is turning conventional wisdom upside-down as
even the IMF now calls for large deficit-spending policies (for
advanced economies, at least). One might think the conditions imposed
on Ukraine, where unemployment is rising fast and salary delays are
now widespread, are too strict and socially painful. The hardship in
turn could encourage political radicals and the pro-Russia Party of
Regions of former Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych.

But Tymoshenko isn’t complaining. "You are never popular when you ask
a sick person to undergo surgery," she says. "But what has to be done,
has to be done. Cooperating with the IMF requires a serious budget
policy for any country. It’s never easy. But it’s a guarantee of
stability."

The political challenges Tymoshenko faces as she struggles with
Ukraine’s financial crisis might be treacherous, but the subject
matter, at least, is familiar. She received a typical Soviet-era
education as an "economist-cyberneticist" — Soviet-speak for
management — in Dnepropetrovsk, the mostly Russian-speaking eastern
Ukrainian town where she was born in 1960. She started her career as
an "economy engineer" at a local machine-building plant during the
Gorbachev years. With the demise of the Soviet Union and national
independence, she was quick to seize the opportunities of the new
era. During the 1990s, she was a top manager at Ukrainian Petrol and
United Energy Systems of Ukraine and is understood to have made a
fortune at that time.

It was a tough, unsparing environment to prosper in, to say the
least. Tymoshenko has come a long way from then. It is especially
ironic that this businesswoman turned anti-Russian revolutionary is
now disparaged by Yushchenko as a thinly disguised Russian pawn.

Not that dealing with Russia has gotten any easier. Russian Prime
Minister Vladimir Putin did not like Tymoshenko’s recent deal with the
European Union on the modernization of Ukraine’s gas infrastructure,
and Moscow is holding up a $5 billion loan to Ukraine to mark its
dissatisfaction.

"All this crossfire shows what I really stand for is our own national
interest," she says. Then she is quick to add: "The Russians worry
that we are trying to privatize our pipelines by stealth, but that’s
not the case and would be illegal. We have to reassure them on that."

Tymoshenko returns frequently to the challenges presented by Ukraine’s
position between Russia and the European Union. "There is no doubt we
want to join the EU. At least 60 percent of our public opinion favors
this option, and we are now closer to this goal than, say, one year
ago. This policy must be the essence of all our actions," she
says. But, she warns, it cannot succeed by confronting Moscow or
ignoring its concerns.

This is balance-of-power politics of the post-Soviet, post-Georgia-war
variety. To her critics, it looks a bit like squaring the circle. To
her, it’s simply a matter of recognizing reality. "I try to defend our
interests so that we can find a balance in our relations both with the
EU and Russia," Tymoshenko explains, meaning she wants her country to
get into the EU without giving the impression of antagonizing Russia.

Could the same strategy apply to Ukraine’s relations with NATO? Here
the prime minister sighs for a split second: "There, it’s more
complex." It’s not so much that she is frightened by Georgia’s
experience, something she never mentions though it’s clearly on her
mind. While recognizing it would be "uncomfortable" for Ukraine to
remain "in a void, outside all existing security systems," she still
sees several "political barriers" between Kiev and NATO.

Although famous for her sharp tongue, Tymoshenko is treading carefully
these days. The first problem she sees is that barely 25 percent of
Ukrainians favor joining NATO. "Even the president accepts we need to
hold a referendum on this," she acknowledges.

The second "problem" is rather a carefully managed swipe at those
Europeans cozying up a bit too much to Russia — especially Germany
and Italy, one suspects. In Tymoshenko’s own words, "There is no
unanimity in the EU on Ukraine’s joining NATO as we have not yet
witnessed a favorable attitude in every country."

As Tymoshenko goes on, one cannot help but notice her trying to
contain her anger when she feels misunderstood in her actions and
purpose. She laughs softly at my attempts at humor, but when she finds
my questions misjudge her intentions, she bursts out: "It’s not fair
to say that!"

In the same spirit, she reserves her harshest criticism for the G-20’s
grandstanding on protectionism: "Everybody is pursuing some stronger
or weaker form of protectionism. Some people create hurdles for
foreign participation in tenders; others withdraw capital or create
tariff and nontariff obstacles to goods. All this proves damaging to
us all. But lofty declarations will not prevent it; we need effective
rules," she says.

At the moment, Tymoshenko narrowly trails Yanukovych in opinion polls
but remains far more popular than Yushchenko, whose support has fallen
to the single digits. Nonetheless, she remains a controversial
figure. In an identity-obsessed Ukraine that declared independence six
times over the last 90 years, even her family origins fuel much
debate. She grew up speaking Russian and perfected her Ukrainian only
after she moved to politics in her 30s. Through a spokeswoman, she
also "doesn’t comment" on rumors that part of her family comes from
Armenia. It’s hard to imagine her receiving the kind of voter
acceptance enjoyed by Barack Obama and Nicolas Sarkozy with their
foreign-born fathers.

Despite the sometimes harsh treatment from her constituents and the
media, Tymoshenko’s national pride and attention to the everyday lives
of Ukraine’s citizens remain intense. I experienced it myself when I
mentioned in a story that Kiev stores were having a serious shortage
of salt. Ukrainian TV had previously aired stories on locals hoarding
salt in anticipation of inflation and salary cuts. I was called soon
after by an angry Tymoshenko spokesperson: "It’s media speculation,
nothing true. Did you try to buy salt in Kiev? I did last night: I
found it. Immediately."

Why all this fuss over one anecdote in a foreign reporter’s story?
Tymoshenko has learned over the years that with countries — as with
their leaders — image is everything.

Federico Fubini is a journalist for Italy’s Corriere Della Sera
newspaper.

y/cms.php?story_id=4811

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/stor