Italians to export Armenian travertine to South America

Italians to export Armenian travertine to South America

news.am
April 14, 2012 | 05:18

Manana Stone Company invested $22 million for the expansion of its
stone processing plant, the owner of the enterprise Gurger Nikoghosyan
told Armenian News-NEWS.am.

Currently the factory employs several dozens of people but it intends
to reach the number of its workers to 500.

The resources base of the plant is the basalt deposit in Armenia’s
Syunik Region, the conglomerate deposit is in Tavush Region and the
travertine deposit is in Ararat Region, 20 km from the factory.

After reconstruction the factory will lower the production volume a
little but will increase efficiency and will broaden assortment.

The processed stone will be realized in the domestic markets and will
be exported as well. Mainly the stones will be exported to Germany,
Italy, Spain, Portugal and South America.

Turk students organized a demonstration against High-Ranking Officia

Turk students organized a demonstration against Turkish High-Ranking Officials

10:24, 14 April, 2012

YEREVAN, APRIL 14, ARMENPRESS.Turkish Uludag University students hold
a demonstration action against Prime Minister Recep Tayip Erdogan and
Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arenc, Armenpress reports citing ”
Hurriyet” daily.

Protesters came forth holding the photos where Arenc was depicted
crying; the organizers even sang ”you cry” song .They showed off
Erdogan’s photos which carried the statement ”In Middle East
democracy-in Turkey Sultan”. The participants had the poster with
Oscar statuettes which ran” the best second plan actor Bulent
Arenc”,” Let the award be yours”, ” And the Oscar goes to…”

The students waited until Arenc finished his speech in the University.

Armenian renowned poet Hamo Sahyan would have become 98 on April 14

Armenian renowned poet Hamo Sahyan would have become 98 on April 14

11:03, 14 April, 2012

YEREVAN, APRIL 14, ARMENPRESS. Armenian renowned poet Hamo Sahyan’s 98
birthday is marked on April 14. Though long time has passed, the
commandments voiced in his poems are still contemporary and have not
lost their breath of time.

Speaking to Armenpress, Chairman of Armenia’s Writers’ Union Levon
Ananyan said Hamo Sahyan was really the most original face of Armenian
classic literature. While saying Sahyan we imagine our nature, love
toward it. “Besides, we remember the propaganda-commandment not to
lose the harmony given by God and not to turn our life to chaos,”
Ananyan said.

The chairman of the union noted with regret that the whole world has
entered a whirlpool of mess and people are losing ties with nature,
with their roots, traditions. “We should refer to Sahyan more
frequently and his lesson and commandment must guide us,” he said.

Tribute will be paid to the great poet today at the Komitas park pantheon.

Shoah Found. Director Discusses Digitization of Armenian Survivor Te

Shoah Foundation Director Discusses Digitization of Armenian Survivor
Testimonies

asbarez
Friday, April 13th, 2012

by Ara Khachatourian

USC Shoah Foundation Executive Director Dr. Stephen Smith

The USC Institute of Armenian Studies’ Leadership Council will honor
the USC Shoah Foundation Institute, established by legendary filmmaker
Steven Spielberg, for championing the Armenian Genocide Digitization
Project, at a gala banquet to be held on Sunday, April 15 at the
Beverly Hilton Hotel.

The Shoah Foundation Institute, established by Steven Spielberg in
1994, has been part of the USC Dana and David Dornsife College of
Letters, Arts and Sciences since 2006. Its Visual History Archive
contains nearly 52,000 video testimonies of survivors and other
witnesses of the Holocaust; it is one of the largest archives of its
kind in the world.

The goal of the USC Institute of Armenian Studies’ Leadership Council
is to bring together digital copies of all of the collections of
interviews with Armenian Genocide survivors and eyewitnesses,
essentially creating what may become the largest archive of Genocide
eyewitness interviews. With the USC Shoah Foundation Institute’s
support of the Armenian Genocide Digitization Project, the interviews
will be indexed, preserved and made available to scholars, students
and researchers via the institute’s Visual History Archive. The J.
Michael Hagopian/Armenian Film Foundation archive of nearly 400 filmed
eyewitness testimonies will be the first collection in the Armenian
Genocide Digitization Project.

After touring the facility, Asbarez Editor Ara Khachatourian caught up
with the USC Shoah Foundation Institute’s Executive Director Dr.
Stephen D. Smith, who discussed the foundation and detailed the
partnership with the Armenian Film Foundation. We present the
interview below:

ARA KHACHATOURIAN: Tell us about the Shoah Foundation and how it came
into being?

STEPHEN SMITH: The USC Shoah Foundation came into being after the
filming of Schindler’s list when film director Spielberg realized that
many Holocaust survivors who wanted to tell their own personal life
histories. And he set out the project, to enable as many survivors as
wanted to tell their own stories. And 52,000 survivors and witnesses
to the Holocaust were interviewed in 56 countries in 32 languages,
creating a vast audio-visual archive.

A.K.: What is this archive going to be used for?

S.S.: The archive has several purposes. First of all it is about the
documentation of personal life histories. So that what we have is not
just the large scale of what Genocide looks like, but also the
individual stories that make that up. It is very important to document
that. Secondly, it’s about giving voice to the individual so they can
talk about their families, communities and the things that really
matter to them, because when Genocide takes place the intention is to
wipe those out. By these individuals talking about what happened to
them, they reinstate them in memory and in our lives. The third, and
most important, perhaps, is education. To give opportunity for people
around the world to have access to these vitally important life
histories and to understand what it means to them and their lives
today and to learn about their experiences.

A.K.: What about the partnership with the Armenian Film Foundation.
What is that entail and where are you in that process?

S.S.: The archive of the Shoah Foundation was donated to USC in 2006,
creating the USC Shoah Foundation Institute. What we have here is an
infrastructure by which the testimonies of Holocaust survivors have
been documented. But we have the infrastructure is about to digitize,
to preserve, to index, to catalogue and to disseminate audiovisual
life histories. We put together a partnership using the USC Shoah
Foundation as the basis in which the architecture and infrastructure
of the Shoah Foundation is going to be utilized to be able to
digitize, to preserve, to index, catalogue and disseminate the
testimonies of the Armenian Film Foundation.

A.K.: Where are you in that process?

S.S.: So, the collection of 400 histories that J. Michael Hagopian
filmed over 30 years is being compiled so it can be digitized. That
will be done this year. Once the digitization is done, we take each
interview and index it minute-by-minute. There are things that we have
to do, especially for this collection, and, indeed, for any other
Armenian collection we will work with. Because we have very different
geography, all the names of the places, the languages and terminology
need to be addressed. We are bringing in experts to help with that.,
to make sure that what we do has integrity – historical integrity – and
also the integrity of ensuring that we take great care over these
testimonies.

A.K.: One of the concerns that I’ve heard in the community is by
giving this archive to the USC Shoah Foundation it might be lost as an
asset of the community. With this and with future archive, how can the
community be able to access it and use it and how we can ensure that
it is not lost?

S.S.: The beauty of a partnership like this is that the Armenian Film
Foundation retains the ownership of the collection. What we do is we
license a copy of it – the digital copy. Then we have an arrangement
with our partner that we have permission to use that digital copy and
make it accessible to a wider public. What we are interested in, as a
research and an educational institute, is making sure that these
testimonies are given the greatest opportunity to reach the widest
public.

One of the things that we’re all interested in – within the Armenian
community, within the academic community and, indeed in the Jewish
world – is how do we who experienced these experiences, such as the
Armenian Genocide, tell the world what happened and give them a chance
to learn.

The great thing here is that through this partnership the testimonies
themselves will remain as part of the Armenian community’s legacy and
will remain within the Armenian community, but the power of those
testimonies will reach the world.

A.K.: How did you get involved in the Shoah Foundation?

S.S.: I was born in a mining village in middle of Nottinghamshire,
England. My father was a Christian minister in the Methodist Church
and my mother is a religion education teacher. I had no connection to
the Jewish world at all until I went to a family holiday to Israel. We
found a fascinating experience and I got very interested in the
Christian-Jewish relationship initially. With the more I learned about
anti-Semitism within the Christian world the more I realized that
Holocaust did not come out of nowhere and there are real issues to
address here. One of the big moments in my learning experience was
being in Yad Vashem, the Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem. So there I
was, a young guy in my early twenties, coming from Britain and a
Christian background in Israel learning about the Holocaust.

One of the things I learned in Yad Vashem was about a group of people
called `Righteous Among the Nations.’ These were people who rescued
Jews during the Holocaust -all of them rescued at least one Jewish
person except from one of them: his name was Armin T. Wegner. And, I
was very impressed by this individual, because, he had, in 1933, when
the Jews were first boycotted in Nazi Germany, written a letter to
Adolf Hitler saying `in my name, in the name of the German people
STOP, because what you are doing could result in the distraction of
the Jews and certainly would bring shame upon our country forever.’

What I was surprised to find out the same Armin Wegner that spoken out
on behalf of the Jews was the Armin Wegner that taken photographs
during the Armenian Genocide, documented it and then tried, in the
1920s, to be a part of the legal process to bring this to the
attention of the world. So he was a man that experienced the Armenian
Genocide, and was equipped to try to prevent the genocide happening in
the rest of the world. He failed in both counts. The Armenian Genocide
happened and the Holocaust happened. But he was the very same man that
sat with Michael Hagopian in 1967 and said `Michael you are filmmaker,
wouldn’t it be wonderful to use your art to collect the testimonies of
the Armenian Genocide survivors.’ So, this is a part of the legacy
that we all share. Armin Wegner has been a tremendous influence on my
life, because he was the guy that never stopped trying and gave us a
tremendous example of why we want to learn about these genocides.
Because, we want to prevent it in the future too.

A.K.: It’s ironic, because Israel has not recognized the Armenian
Genocide officially. In fact, a couple of months ago one of the
foreign ministry officials said there cannot be a comparison between
the Holocaust and Genocide, because Holocaust was a unique experience.
What are your thoughts on that?

S.S.: Human suffering cannot be compared. How can I say that what I
suffered is greater than what you suffered? It’s a travesty to do
that. However, the causes and the consequences absolutely must be
compared, if we as a human race are to be able to understand what we
are we capable of and to be able to prevent that? What we don’t need
is comparison. What we do need is compassion.

A.K.: The fact that Israel has not recognized…What do you attribute that to?

S.S.: I think this is a tragedy, that any countries took a long time
to recognize the Armenian Genocide for political reasons. This is not
about politics. This is about humanity. I think we all need to be
able, within ourselves as human beings – political entities or as
individuals – to get over those things which hinder us from recognizing
the suffering of others and to be able to just be clear about that. It
doesn’t matter where we are in the world.

A.K.: What of American anti-defamation groups, such as the ADL (The
Anti-Defamation League), which while not denying the Armenian
Genocide, is impeding efforts for international recognition of the
fact.

S.S.: What I can say, is that USC Shoah Foundation Institute is very
clear about this. What happened to the Armenian people was Genocide
and it needs to be recognized as such by the international community
and by organizations wherever they are, so that we can work together
as communities – Armenians, Jews, Christians – wherever we are on a very
vitally important work of education for the future. That’s our mission
here, and we intend to do that in very close cooperation with the
Armenian community.

A.K.: Another issue that has been talked about is the component of
funding for this project? I have been asked by several of our readers
and viewers that are the other groups that are being represented in
the Shoah Foundation collection being asked to raise funds for the
inclusion of their archives? Is there a component of fundraising that
goes on continuously in the Shoah Foundation?

S.S.: Basically, we have different collections – they are like different
projects. So for each of those projects we need to find the
appropriate people to support and fund them. And in fact whether we
talk to our Rwandan colleagues or Armenian colleagues we say let’s
think about what’s the best way to do this. If we have a story to
tell, let’s really take ownership for that. We take our responsibility
very seriouslsy also to think how can we best contribute in terms of
our time, and our effort and our energy to really make this work for
all of us and to share the burden of telling the story. That’s the
principle that we have here.

A.K.: When do you think the Armenian archive will be up and running?

S.S.: From the time, in which we manage to find the funding for the
archive, it’s about an 18 month-to-a year process. One of the things
that we take very seriously here at USC – we are a research
university – is making sure the quality of the work that goes into this
is done at the very highest level.

We’re already tackling enough as it is, in terms of denial and
obfuscation. So what we want to make sure is that we spend enough time
on the detail of the indexing and the clarity of that, so whether
people use it for research or for education, we know we’ve done our
work very thoroughly. If that means, that we take a little longer,
that’s time well spent in my view, because we want this to be right
for the benefit for those 400 people that gave testimonies and other
archives that we might indeed work with in the future on the same
subject matter.

A.K.: How do you safeguard those interviews from being taken and
bastardized by those who want to revise history?

S.S.: Whenever we put content into the public domain we always have
that risk that somebody will misuse it. We have to be very careful
about that and build policies around that. So, one of the policies is
that we release our content on a registration basis only. Maybe, we
want to put some testimonies and make them available to the wider
public and if somebody takes it and misuses it, we do run that risk.
The greater good being served here, and the number of people that get
a great deal out of it, so vastly overwhelms that small number that
are very marginal to our work. Putting work and testimonies in the
public domain has a very beneficial value.

A.K.: As generations are coming up, the distance between the reality
of the Holocaust or Genocide and the current existence is growing
wider. For the Armenian instance it’s almost 97 years. Survivors are
not there anymore. What is your message to the new generation that
might not have direct contact with the first-person account?

S.S.: Of course, you can’t replace a human being. There’s nothing more
wonderful than talking to another soul about their experience and
feeling that sense of connection. But, of course, there’s the reality
of time and we have to deal with it. Video does have a very profound
effect on the way in which this particular generation understands
history. We are experiencing with that now with the Holocaust
survivors testimonies. We weigh carefully how young people are using
them and they do develop a real strong sense of connection. With a
video testimony you see eyes, and the eyes are like the windows to the
soul… And you see the face, you really get a sense of who that person
is and it’s so interesting how often people – students – say `oh I met so
and so.’ And of course they never met them at all, but they saw them
on the screen but they get that sense of connection. So, I believe
that all is not lost and there is a lot to be gained from this.

One of things that bringing the Armenian film foundation collection in
is that in about 18 months from now we will have Holocaust survivors
testimonies, an Armenian survivors testimonies, Rwandan survivors
testimonies all will available to this generation. I can tell you,
from talking with teachers and students, they are really looking
forward to that, because they know that while they are not going to
compare them, they are going to understand human experience in a much
deeper way, to a point in which they can listen to many voices across
many generations.

Le procureur Eric de Montgolfier en visite au Complexe-Ecole Barsami

NICE
Le procureur Eric de Montgolfier en visite au Complexe-Ecole Barsamian

Arrivé à Nice il y a treize ans, le procureur de la République Eric de
Montgolfier a récemment quitté la Côte d’Azur pour Bourges, où il a
pris ses fonctions de procureur général de la Cours d’appel le 12
avril 2012. Toutefois, avant de gagner son nouveau poste, le magistrat
a fait l’honneur aux Français d’origine arménienne de la Côte d’Azur,
de venir visiter le Complexe-Ecole Barsamian de Nice le mardi 10 avril
dernier. En présence de nombreux responsables et membres
d’associations locales, ainsi que des quatre étudiantes de l’UFAR
venues faire leurs stages à Nice, Eric de Montgolfier a débuté sa
visite par la salle des fêtes du centre éducatif et culturel niçois.
Sur place, il s’est longuement entretenu avec ses hôtes sur des thèmes
aussi variés que l’identité, la richesse culturelle arménienne ou
encore l’attachement aux valeurs de la République. Sans tabous, chacun
a pu s’exprimer librement sur ces questions avec le procureur,
démontrant que la diversité des opinions n’était pas une contrainte
mais un atout. Cependant, tous les intervenants se sont accordé sur un
même point, celui qui veux que l’intégration au sein de la société
française, ne doit pas s’accompagner d’une perte de lien avec ses
racines.

Cette dure tche, les enseignantes de l’école Barsamian s’y attèlent
quotidiennement, comme a pu le constater Eric de Montgolfier. Dans la
classe du Cycle I, ce dernier s’est familiarisé avec les méthodes
éducatives destinées aux plus jeunes ; dans celle du Cycle II, il a pu
rencontrer des élèves studieux qui ont interprété une chanson à son
attention ; enfin, dans la classe du Cycle III, la procureur a assisté
à une saynète très réussie sur le thème de la justice, qui a enchanté
ses spectateurs. Par ailleurs, le magistrat fut également invité à
exposer aux élèves, ce que signifiait pour lui le terme d’intégrité. «
C’est lorsque l’on peux se regarder dans un miroir sans avoir honte
de soi » résumera t-t-il. Afin que ce dernier garde en mémoire son
passage à l’école Barsamian, les élèves lui remirent une magnifique
composition qu’il avaient réalisé.

Enfin, après s’être rendu dans la salle d’arménien, le procureur et
ses accompagnateurs investirent la terrasse du complexe Barsamian
située face à la cité arménienne. Là, c’est l’histoire des premiers
arrivants arméniens, les survivants du génocide de 1915, qui lui fut
détaillée. Avant que M. Eric de Montgolfier ne prenne congés, et après
que les élèves eurent interprétés les hymnes nationaux français et
arménien, c’est autour d’un rafraîchissement que les participants se
sont réunis afin de partager leurs émotions de la matinée. Le
président du Conseil Communautaire Arménien de la Côte d’Azur, Gaspard
Kayadjanian, profita alors de ces quelques instants pour remercier le
magistrat d’être venu, ainsi que pour toutes ces années de loyaux
services qu’il a consacré à la population niçoise. Visiblement
satisfait par sa visite, le procureur ne manqua pas de remercier et de
saluer un à un, tous ceux qui l’avait accueilli. Le plaisir étant
partagé par ses hôtes, nul doute que ces derniers n’oublieront pas de
sitôt leur rencontre avec l’un des plus grands représentants du
pouvoir judiciaire de notre pays.

samedi 14 avril 2012,
Ara ©armenews.com

De nouveaux accords militaires arméno-russes vont être signés

ARMENIE-RUSSIE
De nouveaux accords militaires arméno-russes vont être signés

L’Arménie et la Russie vont signer une série d’accords portant sur le
renforcement de la coopération militaire et le développement de la
technologie des armées. Annonce effectuée par Arthur Baghdassarian, le
Secrétaire national du Conseil de sécurité de l’Arménie après une
réunion d’experts militaires Arméniens et Russes. A. Baghdassarian a
affirmé que ces accords permettront à Erévan et Moscou une plus grande
efficacité dans les échanges militaires et une modernisation de
l’armée arménienne.

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 14 avril 2012,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

Is Turkey Losing Political War Against Armenians?

IS TURKEY LOSING POLITICAL WAR AGAINST ARMENIANS?
By Appo Jabarian

USA Armenian Life Magazine
April 13, 2012

During recent years Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s much
fanfared foreign policy of “Zero problems with neighbors” has turned
into “Zero neighbors without problems.”

After Turkey’s posturing as a mediator between Israel and Arabs has
backfired both in Tel Aviv and the Arab street, Turkish Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan has turned against his longtime ally President
Bashar Assad of Syria. Compounding the situation, The Economist
magazine reported that Mr Erdogan’s secular critics argued that
“his behaviour points to another troubling impulse: to lead an arc
of Sunni Muslim countries spanning Africa, Asia, the Balkans and the
Middle East. As evidence they point to Turkey’s coddling of Syria’s
Muslim Brotherhood.”

The Economist underlined: “These days, when Mr Erdogan attacks Kemal
Kilicdaroglu, the CHP leader, he draws attention to his membership of
the minority Alevi faith. He has even suggested that Mr Kilicdaroglu
opposes intervention in Syria out of a sense of kinship with Mr Assad,
who belongs to the Alawite sect, often seen as a close cousin to
Turkey’s 15m-20m Alevis. The Alevis practise a liberal form of Shia
Islam and have long faced discrimination. Although their rituals
differ from the Alawites in Syria, they feel some solidarity with
them. Mr Van Dam warns that any war against Syria could ‘further
polarise Sunnis and Alevis within Turkey.'”

Making matters worse for Mr. Erdogan, The Economist continued:
“The Syrian crisis has exposed another long-running Turkish sore:
its Kurdish minority. Selahattin Demirtas, leader of Turkey’s mainly
Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP), insists that Turkey is seeking
regime change in Syria ‘to ensure that the Syrian Kurds don’t get any
more rights than Turkey is prepared to grant its own Kurds, which is
hardly any at all.'”

It is against this backdrop of numerous explosive internal problems
with about 25-30 million Kurds, and 15-20 million Alevis; intensifying
problems with neighbors such as Iraq, and Syria; lingering problems
with Greece and Cyprus; Armenian advances in the international arena,
Turkey desperately seeks to find solace in Diasporan ‘soft’ Armenians.

Disheartened by its own failed efforts to derail Armenian quest for
justice; and by its fruitless attempts to make the facts of Armenian
Genocide debatable on the world stage, Turkey is becoming more and
more desperate in scoring a political victory against Armenians with
the help of ‘soft’ Armenians.

Harut Sassounian, Publisher of The California Courier has captured
the essence of the moment in his most recent article: “Realizing that
Turkey had to deal with the Diaspora, not just Armenia to resolve
genocide related issues, Davutoglu once again turned his attention
to Armenian communities worldwide. During a March 24, 2010 CNN-Turk
interview, he announced that Turkish authorities would initiate a
dialog with ‘sensible’ Diaspora Armenians. To pursue this stratagem,
in April 2010 Davutoglu met in Washington with Turkey’s ambassadors
to the United States and Canada, and Consul Generals in Chicago,
Houston, Los Angeles, and Toronto. He instructed them to contact
Armenians who are open to dialog, and to avoid ‘hard-line groups,’
according to the Turkish ‘Today’s Zaman’ newspaper.”

“Dissatisfied with the efforts of his diplomats, Davutoglu decided
to take matters into his own hands. Last month, he spent several
hours in Washington meeting privately with several Armenians and
non-Armenians from the Los Angeles area to discuss ‘Armenian-Turkish
reconciliation.’ The Turkish Foreign Minister also invited the
attendees to come to Ankara and bring along other ‘prominent’
Armenians. Since then, Davutoglu has held similar meetings elsewhere,”
Sassounian pointed out.

Jirair Tutunjian, a well-known Armenian activist ridiculed Turkey’s
attempts to woo ‘Soft’ Armenians: “As of this morning, I will wait
with bated breath for the postman to deliver the buff envelope with
the crescent-and-star insignia of the Turkish Embassy on the top
left corner. In it I expect to find an invitation for a two-week
familiarization trip to Turkey, featuring a whirlwind visit to Turkish
government archives which would prove there was no genocide, followed
by a visit to the Great Mustapha’s mausoleum to place a wreath. … To
wrap up the trip, I expect to be regaled …. I will return from the
junket with several kilograms of Turkish bumph about ‘Turkey: bridge
between East and West’, ‘Turkey: Model Muslim Democracy’, ‘Turks: the
Origin of the Human Race’, ‘Armenian Terrorists Allies of El-Qaida’,
‘1,000 Turks Who Changed the World.’ I would expect that the man
from Turkish foreign ministry insist that he pay the airline for
the extra weight. … Upon my return, I will tell every one I know
that Turks are our bosom cousins, that some Armenians were killed by
Kurdish and Circassian bandits in 1915, that some treacherous Armenian
revolutionaries had wanted to tear apart Turkey and eventually rule
it with Russian help, and mention the benefits of Armenia becoming
a Turkish vassal state…discount-price canned imam bayildi, ….I
think I just heard the postman ring the bell.”

Echoing the concerns expressed by Sassounian, Joseph wrote on
armenianweekly.com: “‘Reconciliation’ has nothing to do with
rapprochement with Armenians. Just like TARC, the Turkish state wants
to utilize ‘reconciliation’ to deflect genocide recognition full-stop.

That is the only purpose and it’s so disgusting but then again,
what more can you expect from them?”

Avery commented: “Why bother? What ‘dialogue’? There is nothing to
‘dialogue’ about. If and when the State of Turkey unconditionally
recognizes the Armenian Genocide, then we can ‘dialogue’ about the
depth and breadth of reparations. Other than that, there is nothing
to talk about with representatives of the Turkish State (private or
official). Just don’t open the door when FM Davutoglu knocks. Ignore
them and they’ll go away.”

Sella added: “I agree with Avery, that we have to keep our doors
closed when Mr. Dovlotoghlu and ‘his friends’ knock, but the problem
here is that if we close our doors they are going to enter from the
windows. So, Armenians, please keep your doors and windows shut. Never
forget that 75%, (if not more) of our people were killed by Turks.

And, that 7 million Armenian Diaspora is created by Turks. … Devil
did not do us as much harm as Turks did.”

Add to this mix, the positive political developments in France.

Whether a modified French law criminalizing the denial of Genocide
gets instituted next year or in coming years, it is secondary. What’s
important is the creation of a defacto political firewall around the
veracity of Armenian Genocide. The noble attempts to legislate that
law, by the French people and the parties in power and the opposition,
as well as the Executive and Legislative branches of French state
have further solidified the Armenian Cause. It doesn’t matter how
these political efforts are fueled!

Whether incumbent French President Nicolas Sarkozy is seeking votes to
get re-elected; or he is leading a pan-European movement to keep Turkey
– “The Sick Man of Europe” out of the European Union, is subordinate to
another factor – the reinforcement of the notion that the international
community is not debating the factuality of Armenian Genocide. And
that spells trouble for Turkey in the coming years and decades.

Turkish courageous Publisher and an outspoken critic of Ankara’s
denialist policy, Ragip Zarakolu’s April 10 release Turkish prison
undoudtedly will empower many more Turkish activists to come forward
with their public acknowledgement of the Genocide.

“Arab Spring” has engendered “Turkish Spring!” Hardly a day goes by
without the members of the Turkish Deep State seeing the world around
them collapse. An increasing number of Turkish youth refuses to be
duped by their denialist leaders into “buying” the Turkish state’s
false propaganda against Armenian genocide and Armenians.

As anti-genocide activitsts get further organized, and are joined by
an increasing number of righteous Turks, the noose around the Turkish
denialism will surely become tighter. The exodus from the Turkish
denialist is expected to intensify as Turkish righteous activists
become bolder.

And why is Turkey losing the political war against Armenians?

Undeniably, the latters are well-armed with truth, and have ablsolutely
no qualms about discharging their political guns at every step of
the way.

On The Campaign Trail: Ruling Party Believes In "change", Main Oppos

ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL: RULING PARTY BELIEVES IN “CHANGE”, MAIN OPPOSITION BLOC ALREADY SEES “CHANGE” IN COALITION RIFT
By Gayane Lazarian

ArmeniaNow
13.04.12 | 13:26

On Day 5 of the four-week parliamentary election campaign on Thursday
representatives of the political forces participating in the May 6 vote
continued to actively present their programs and criticize opponents.

The chairman of the ruling Republican Party, President Serzh Sargsyan,
met with residents of Yerevan’s southwestern Malatia-Sebastia
community to promise action to deal with social polarization and
“causes” of this injustice.

Enlarge Photo

Enlarge Photo “I believe in it, and I am here today to share this
belief with you.

It is impossible to live well without having a law-abiding state,”
Sargsyan said.

The incumbent president also stressed that one of the focuses of his
government’s economic policies will be the stimulation of small and
medium-sized enterprise.

“We will provide guarantees so that you set up your own businesses. A
new economic concept has already been adopted, tax administration will
be simplified and the tax burden will be shifted onto large taxpayers.

No anti-competitive practice will remain unpunished,” stressed
Sargsyan, also calling on the community’s residents to vote for Samvel
Alexanyan, an affluent entrepreneur seeking reelection in the local
single-mandate constituency.

Opposition Heritage party leader Raffi Hovannisian and his team
went to the Kotayk province where in the town of Hrazdan, about
45 kilometers to the northeast of capital Yerevan, he urged local
residents to believe only in themselves.

“And if anyone now expects free and fair elections, from this very
moment from Hrazdan to Yerevan, from north to south, they must
stop that enlistment, that false benevolence with which they want
to subjugate our ordinary citizens,” said Hovannsian, stressing that
what the government today presents as assistance to people is actually
its duty.

The Heritage leader said Armenia needed change and needed it now.

Meanwhile, changes are already noticeable for opposition Armenian
National Congress (ANC) leader Levon Ter-Petrosyan. He spoke about
that in the town of Yeghvard, which is some 20 kilometers from Yerevan,
noting that while until recently the ruling coalition was “one united
fist”, then today it has a rift in it. Ter-Petrosyan said that the
Prosperous Armenia Party (PAP) has ceased to be President Sargsyan’s
“adjunct”, which, according to him, will play a major role in the
formation of the future parliament.

“The Prosperous Armenia Party is trying to be independent in its
actions and has made some serious steps in this direction,” emphasized
Ter-Petrosyan, mentioning among such steps the PAP’s joining the
recent push of the broad-based opposition for an all-proportional
system of parliamentary representation and the latest initiative on
establishing a common vote monitoring body.

According to the opposition leader, the split in the coalition will
make it possible to turn the National Assembly into a political body
and a counterbalance to the executive power.

“We want to turn the parliament into a political body. We would agree
to the country’s being governed by Dashnaktsutyun, the Communists,
which are political parties, but not by thugs and bandits, which the
Republican Party is,” said Ter-Petrosyan.

In another town of the Kotayk province, Abovyan, the ANC presented to
citizens the four principles of its current election struggle: “Active
involvement in election monitoring and ensuring the lawfulness of the
elections; having the two main pillars of the Sargsyan government,
the Republican Party of Armenia and its appendix, Orinats Yerkir,
as the main targets of criticism; not campaigning against political
forces and in the event of competing against candidates of political
forces in the same constituencies being guided by the principle of
mutual respect.”

Belarusian Lawyer Nominated For Hrant Dink Award

BELARUSIAN LAWYER NOMINATED FOR HRANT DINK AWARD

PanARMENIAN.Net
April 13, 2012 – 13:59 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Amnesty International Germany stated the intention
to nominate Belarusian lawyer Pavel Sapelka for the International
Hrant Dink Award, presented to people who work for a world free
of discrimination, racism, and violence, take personal risks for
their ideals, use the language of peace and by doing so, inspire and
encourage others, charter97.org reported.

The expert group on Belarus believes that the nomination of Pavel
Sapelka is a good opportunity to call public attention to the difficult
situation of lawyers in Belarus, the report says.

In March 2011 the presidium of the Minsk City Bar yielded to
the pressure of the Ministry of Justice and expelled Mr. Sapelka
from the bar, thus depriving him of the opportunity to continue his
professional activity. At that time the lawyer was defending figurants
of the criminal case concerning the “mass riot” of 19 December 2010 –
Andrei Sannikau and Pavel Seviarynets, as well as Dzmitry Dashkevich
(arrested on charges of beating a passer-by on 18 December).

Hrant Dink, a well-known Armenian Turkish journalist of, editor of the
Agos weekly issued in Turkey, was killed in 2007 in Istanbul. Hrant
Dink Foundation has been presented to courageous civil activists or
journalists struggling for freedom of speech and human rights.

Traditionally, two prize holders are chosen each year – a citizen of
Turkey and a foreigner. The International Hrant Dink Award Committee
includes Dink’s widow Rakel Dink, members of the European Parliament,
writers and civil activists. The award ceremony takes place in
Istanbul.

Tbilisi-Based Armenian Community Seeks Erection Of Genocide Memorial

TBILISI-BASED ARMENIAN COMMUNITY SEEKS ERECTION OF GENOCIDE MEMORIAL

Tert.am
13.04.12

The Armenian Diaspora in Tbilisi has asked City Hall to erect a
memorial to their genocide at the hands of the Turks in the early
20th century.

Georgian officials have not yet responded to the demand, but it is
clear that if they build the monument it will cause a significant
amount of discontent among Georgia’s neighbours, Turkey and Azerbaijan,
The Messenger Online reports.

The proposed memorial would be erected near Avlabari Metro station,
according to a general agreement reached with City Hall two years ago.

Chair of a multinational Georgia NGO, Arnold Stepanyan, supports the
idea of a monument in Tbilisi. Yet the Armenian Diaspora is courting
controversy. Advocates of the memorial know that such a move will
create problems for Georgia in Turkey and Azerbaijan. Erecting
a memorial means indirectly recognizing the genocide, which is a
political act. This could also cause discontent in the ethnic Azeri
population in Georgia, and could strain relations between them and
ethnic Armenians. This could needlessly aggravate the situation in
Georgia. Giorgi Gigauri from Asaval-Dasavali draws certain parallels,
wondering what would happen if Georgians demanded that Armenia
erect in Yerevan a memorial to the Georgians who suffered under the
Russian occupation. It would be a provocative move and one Armenia
could not yield to, as it would be targeted against its strategic
partner, Russia.

However, only recently the Georgian Parliament officially recognized
the genocide of the Cherkez people by Russia in the 19th century –
so there is a precedent that the government, whatever their decision,
will have to work around.